DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Erie Connector Project Environmental Assessment Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Erie Connector Project Environmental Assessment Draft Lake Erie Connector Project Draft Environmental Assessment Volume 1 – Main Document U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability Washington DC June 2016 Cover Photo Credits http://www.itclakeerieconnector.com/ DRAFT LAKE ERIE CONNECTOR PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Volume 1—Main Document DOE/EA-2019 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY COOPERATING AGENCY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS This Page Intentionally Left Blank Lake Erie Connector Project Draft Environmental Assessment COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability COOPERATING AGENCIES U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Pittsburgh District TITLE ITC Lake Erie Connector Project LOCATION Erie County, Pennsylvania CONTACTS For additional information on this Draft EA contact: Mr. Brian Mills National Environmental Policy Act Document Manager Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, OE-20 U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Telephone: (202) 586-8267 [email protected] ABSTRACT: ITC Lake Erie Connector, LLC (ITC Lake Erie) applied to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a Presidential permit to construct, operate and maintain an approximate 72-mile long, 1,000-megawatt (MW), +/-320-kilovolt (kV), high-voltage direct current (HVDC) electric power transmission system that originates in Haldimand County, Ontario, Canada and terminates in Erie County, Pennsylvania, United States. The United States’ portion of the proposed ITC Lake Erie (LEC) Project is approximately 42.8 miles in length. This Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed transmission line (Preferred Alternative) and the No Action Alternative. The proposed transmission cable would include both aquatic (underwater) and terrestrial (primarily underground) segments in Pennsylvania. The underwater portions of the proposed transmission cable would be buried in the bed of Lake Erie, and the terrestrial portions would be buried, principally in roadway right-of-way (ROW). The proposed LEC Project would cross the United States- Canadian border in Lake Erie as a submerged cable (approximately 35 miles underwater in Lake Erie within the United States) and would emerge onshore on private property, west of Erie Bluffs State Park. The proposed LEC Project would then track approximately 7 miles underground to a proposed +/- 320- kV new direct current (DC) to 345-kV alternating current (AC) HVDC converter station (new Erie Converter Station) in Conneaut Township, Erie County, Pennsylvania. Approximately 2,153 feet of 345-kV AC underground transmission cables would run between the new proposed Erie Converter Station and the nearby Penelec Erie West Substation. The proposed LEC Project would terminate at the existing Penelec Erie West Substation and interconnect with the transmission system operated by PJM Interconnection, LLC, (PJM), a Regional Transmission Operator (RTO). PUBLIC COMMENTS: Comments on this Draft EA are accepted through July 5, 2016. U.S. Department of Energy June 2016 i Lake Erie Connector Project Draft Environmental Assessment This Page Intentionally Left Blank U.S. Department of Energy June 2016 ii Lake Erie Connector Project Draft Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER SHEET................................................................................................................................. i ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. iii LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... v TABLE OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... vi TABLE OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... vi 1 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE ACTION ............................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 DOE’s Purpose of and Need for Agency Action ................................................................. 1-2 1.3 DOE’s Proposed Action ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 ITC Lake Erie’s Objectives ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.5 Public Participation and Interagency Coordination ............................................................. 1-3 1.6 Interagency Coordination ................................................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Organization of this Draft EA ............................................................................................ 1-5 2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 Proposed Lake Erie Connector Project Overview ............................................................... 2-1 2.4 Proposed Project Location, Design, and Construction Methods .......................................... 2-3 2.4.1 Description of Proposed Route Segments ................................................................ 2-3 2.4.2 Aquatic Direct Current Transmission Cable ............................................................. 2-4 2.4.3 Terrestrial Transmission Cable ................................................................................ 2-7 2.4.4 Proposed New Erie Converter Station Description ................................................. 2-10 2.4.5 Construction and Schedule .................................................................................... 2-15 2.5 Decommissioning ............................................................................................................ 2-20 2.6 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated From Further Detailed Analysis .......................... 2-21 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Lake Erie Segment............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.1 Land Use ................................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.2 Transportation and Traffic ....................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Water Resources and Quality................................................................................... 3-3 3.1.4 Aquatic Habitats and Species................................................................................... 3-7 3.1.5 Protected and Sensitive Aquatic Species ................................................................ 3-11 3.1.6 Terrestrial Habitats and Species ............................................................................. 3-12 3.1.7 Terrestrial Protected and Sensitive Species ............................................................ 3-13 3.1.8 Terrestrial Wetlands .............................................................................................. 3-15 3.1.9 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................. 3-16 3.1.10 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 3-17 3.1.11 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................... 3-19 3.1.12 Recreation ............................................................................................................. 3-20 3.1.13 Visual Resources ................................................................................................... 3-21 3.1.14 Public Health and Safety ....................................................................................... 3-22 3.1.15 Noise .................................................................................................................... 3-23 3.1.16 Hazardous Materials and Wastes ........................................................................... 3-24 3.1.17 Air Quality ............................................................................................................ 3-25 3.1.18 Socioeconomics .................................................................................................... 3-30 U.S. Department of Energy June 2016 iii Lake Erie Connector Project Draft Environmental Assessment 3.1.19 Environmental Justice............................................................................................ 3-34 3.2 Overland Segment............................................................................................................ 3-35 3.2.1 Land Use ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas in New York
    R L NS Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas in New York State Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin MLRA Explorer Custom Report L - Lake State Fruit, Truck Crop, and Dairy Region 101 - Ontario-Erie Plain and Finger Lakes Region M - Central Feed Grains and Livestock Region 111E - Indiana and Ohio Till Plain, Eastern Part 111B - Indiana and Ohio Till Plain, Northeastern Part R - Northeastern Forage and Forest Region 144B - New England and Eastern New York Upland, Northern Part 144A - New England and Eastern New York Upland, Southern Part 143 - Northeastern Mountains 142 - St. Lawrence-Champlain Plain 141 - Tughill Plateau 140 - Glaciated Allegheny Plateau and Catskill Mountains 139 - Lake Erie Glaciated Plateau Major Land Resource Regions Custom Report Page 1 Data Source: USDA Agriculture Handbook 296 (2006) 03/26/08 http://soils.usda.gov/MLRAExplorer L - Lake State Fruit, Truck Crop, and Dairy Region Figure L-1: Location of Land Resource Region L LRR Overview This region (shown in fig. L-1) is in Michigan (59 percent), New York (22 percent), Ohio (10 percent), Indiana (8 percent), and Illinois (1 percent). A very small part is in Pennsylvania. The region makes up 45,715 square miles (118,460 square kilometers). Typically, the land surface is a nearly level to gently sloping glaciated plain (fig. L-2). The average annual precipitation is typically 30 to 41 inches (760 to 1,040 millimeters), but it is 61 inches (1,550 millimeters) in the part of the region east of Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Natural History
    CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY CHAPTER 1. NATURAL HISTORY —THE WILDERNESS THAT GREETED THE FIRST SETTLERS The land one sees today traveling through northern Ohio took gone. Thus, some 14,000 years ago as the last glacier receded millions of years to form. We can see evidence of tropical sea into the Lake Erie basin, the first Native Americans arrived and reefs on the Lake Erie Islands and deep ocean sediments here in began to utilize the natural resources that these natural processes the cliffs of the Black River. Ohio was just south of the equator had produced. at that time, some 350 million years ago, and over the millennia The natural history of Sheffield encompasses all those natural has migrated northward to its present position. Mountain features and processes of the environment that greeted the Native building to the east eventually raised the sea floor from under Americans, and later the pioneers, when they first arrived in the waves and erosion by streams, and later glacial ice, began Sheffield. To be sure, the landscape was a magnificent wilderness to sculpture the land. At the same time plants and animals were to the settlers, but it needed to be “tamed” in order to support evolving and began to populate the new land once the ice was the newcomers. Ice formation on the shale bluff of the Black River north of Garfield Bridge (2005). 1 BICENTENNIAL HISTORY OF SHEFFIELD TOPOGRAPHY Regional Physiography The topography of an area is the configuration of the land Physiography refers to the physical features or landforms of surface, including its relief [vertical differences in elevation of a region.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems
    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1996 Background Paper THE LAND BY THE LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Holland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. October 1997 ISBN 0-662-26033-3 EPA 905-R-97-015c Cat. No. En40-11/35-3-1997E ii The Land by the Lakes—SOLEC 96 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................. v 1. Overview of the Land by the Lakes .................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure ......................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................. 2 1.4 Key Observations ........................................................ 3 1.5 Moving Forward ......................................................... 5 2. The Ecoregional Context .......................................................... 6 2.1 Why Consider Ecoregional Context? .......................................... 6 2.2 Classification Systems for Great Lakes Ecoregions ............................... 7 3. Where Land and Water Meet ....................................................... 9 3.1 Changing Shapes and Structures ............................................. 9 3.1.1 Crustal Tilting ................................................. 10 3.1.2 Climate ....................................................... 10 3.1.3 Erosion ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Niagara Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE NIAGARA QUADRANGLE. By E. M. Kindle and F. B. Taylor.a INTRODUCTION. different altitudes, but as a whole it is distinctly higher than by broad valleys opening northwestward. Across northwestern GENERAL RELATIONS. the surrounding areas and is in general bounded by well-marked Pennsylvania and southwestern New York it is abrupt and escarpments. i nearly straight and its crest is about 1000 feet higher than, and The Niagara quadrangle lies between parallels 43° and 43° In the region of the lower Great Lakes the Glaciated Plains 4 or 5 miles back from the narrow plain bordering Lake Erie. 30' and meridians 78° 30' and 79° and includes the Wilson, province is divided into the Erie, Huron, and Ontario plains From Cattaraugus Creek eastward the scarp is rather less Olcott, Tonawanda, and Lockport 15-minute quadrangles. It and the Laurentian Plateau. (See fig. 2.) The Erie plain abrupt, though higher, and is broken by deep, narrow valleys thus covers one-fourth of a square degree of the earth's sur­ extending well back into the plateau, so that it appears as a line face, an area, in that latitude, of 870.9 square miles, of which of northward-facing steep-sided promontories jutting out into approximately the northern third, or about 293 square miles, the Erie plain. East of Auburn it merges into the Onondaga lies in Lake Ontario. The map of the Niagara quadrangle shows escarpment. also along its west side a strip from 3 to 6 miles wide comprising The Erie plain extends along the base of the Portage escarp­ Niagara River and a small area in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • American Woodcock Conservation Plan a Summary of and Recommendations for Woodcock Conservation in North America
    American Woodcock Conservation Plan A Summary of and Recommendations for Woodcock Conservation in North America A Wildlife Management Institute Publication February 2008 American Woodcock Conservation Plan A Summary of and Recommendations for Woodcock Conservation in North America Edited by: James Kelley Scot Williamson Thomas R. Cooper Compiled by the: Woodcock Task Force Migratory Shore and Upland Game Bird Working Group Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies © February 2008 A Wildlife Management Institute Publication Technical edit and publication design by Jennifer Rahm, consultant Front Matter Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Bird Conservation Region Action Plans 11 Prairie Potholes 17 James Kelley 12 Boreal Hardwood Transition 25 Dan Dessecker 13 Lower Great Lakes/St. Lawrence Plain 32 Tim Post 14 Atlantic Northern Forest 45 Dan McAuley 21 Oaks and Prairies 59 David Haukos, James Kelley 22 Eastern Tallgrass Prairie 67 James Kelley 23 Prairie Hardwood Transition 75 James Kelley 24 Central Hardwoods 83 David Krementz, Nick Myatt 25 West Gulf Coastal Plain/Ouachita 92 David Krementz, Nick Myatt 26 Mississippi Alluvial Valley 99 David Krementz, Nick Myatt 27 Southeastern Coastal Plain 108 Scot Williamson 28 Appalachian Mountains 116 Mark Banker 29 Piedmont 128 William Palmer 30 New England/Mid-Atlantic Coast 138 Scot Williamson 31 Peninsular Florida 148 Scot Williamson 37 Gulf Coastal Prairie 151 James Kelley Appendix I 155 Appendix II 157 Bibliography 159 iii American Woodcock Conservation Plan Executive Summary The American woodcock (Scolopax minor) is a popular game bird throughout eastern North America and is managed on the basis of two populations: eastern and central. Both populations have experienced significant declines since surveys were first implemented in the mid-1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euclid Heights Allotment: a Palimpsest of the Nineteenth Century Search for Real Estate Value in Cleveland's East End
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU ETD Archive 1997 The Euclid Heights Allotment: a Palimpsest of the Nineteenth Century Search for Real Estate Value in Cleveland's East End William C. Barrow Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive Part of the History Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Barrow, William C., "The Euclid Heights Allotment: a Palimpsest of the Nineteenth Century Search for Real Estate Value in Cleveland's East End" (1997). ETD Archive. 807. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/etdarchive/807 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in ETD Archive by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EUCLID HEIGHTS ALLOTMENT: A PALIMPSEST OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY SEARCH FOR REAL ESTATE V ALUE IN CLEVELAND'S EAST END WILLIAM C. BARROW Bachelor of Arts in History Cleveland State University June, 1992 submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS OF HISTORY at the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY August, 1997 ©Copyright by William Clyde Barrow 1997 All Rights Reserved This thesis has been approved for the Department of HISTORY and the College of Graduate Studies by Thesis Committee Chairper n 1M &i2~ 19'17 Departm ntlDate I:. ~ .J • 1"'- f • /Jl~" ~J 1111 ~---D-e-p-artk~-en-t-ID-a-t-e--~ DepartmentlDate This thesis has been approved for the Department of HISTORY and the College of Graduate Studies by DepartmentlDate DepartmentlDate Department/Date To my mother Phrone Keysar Barrow who waited so long for this ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge and thank those people who contributed to this thesis: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION. the Detroit District, As Will Be Shown Later, Occupies a Sort a Thick Mantle of Drift, It Becomes a Broad, Gentle Slope That GENERAL RELATIONS
    By W. H. Sherzer.J INTRODUCTION. The Detroit district, as will be shown later, occupies a sort a thick mantle of drift, it becomes a broad, gentle slope that GENERAL RELATIONS. of focal position in the region geologically, geographically, rises 300 to 400 feet in 20 miles. and commercially. This advantage of position, a favorable Relief. The altitude of Lake Erie is 573 feet and that of The area mapped and described in this folio and here called climate, and abundant natural resources of several sorts in the Lakes Huron and Michigan 582 feet above sea level, and the the Detroit district lies between parallels 42° and 42° 30' and immediate neighborhood have combined to cause the rapid land surface of the region ranges in altitude from that of the extends westward from Lake St. Clair, Detroit River, and development of the city as a commercial and manufacturing lake shores to 1,700 feet in the Northern Upland and on Lake Erie to meridian 83° 30'. It comprises the "Wayne, center. the Allegheny Plateau. Lake Erie is nowhere more than 150 Detroit, Grosse Pointe, Romulus, and Wyandotte quadrangles feet deep, but the greatest depth of Lake Huron is more than and includes a land area of 772 square miles. It is in south­ 700 feet and that of Lake Michigan nearly 900 feet, so that eastern Michigan and includes the greater part of Wayne parts of the bottoms of both those lakes are below sea level County and small parts of Macornb, Monroe, and Oakland and the total relief of the region is 2,000 feet or more.
    [Show full text]
  • NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN (Phase I)
    NIAGARA RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN (Phase I) Chapter 2: Watershed Characterization The Niagara River Watershed is located along the western most portion of New York State and drains into the Niagara River, the channel that connects two Great Lakes - Erie and Ontario – and divides the U.S. from Canada. New York State has a total of 17 major drainage basins. The Niagara River Watershed is included within the larger Lake Erie/Niagara River Drainage Basin. Lake Erie and the two principal rivers of the watershed, Buffalo and Niagara, receive waters from over 19 smaller tributaries within the watershed. In total, the watershed encompasses 903,305 Aerial of the Niagara River (NASA) acres of land, 3,193 miles of watercourses, and several small lakes and ponds within the Counties of Erie, Niagara, Genesee, Orleans and Wyoming. Watershed Boundary & Sub-watersheds Within New York State, the Niagara River Watershed is largely made up of eleven smaller sub- watersheds (See Niagara River Watershed Map on following page), each of which has defined boundaries based upon a 10-digit Hydrological Unit Code (HUC). The U.S. Geological Survey established the hydrological unit system as a basis for watershed planning on science-based hydrologic principles, rather than favoring administrative boundaries or a particular agency. The codes are structured in a hierarchy system to identify smaller sub-watersheds nested within larger watersheds. Table 2.1 below lists the eleven sub-watersheds that are part of the Niagara River Watershed, their 10-digit HUC, and
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 38. Geological Series 32 OIL and GAS FIELDS of MICHIGAN
    STATE OF MICHIGAN CHAPTER IV. Historical Geology ................................37 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Difficulties in tracing the evolution of the synclinal George E. Hogarth, Director basin.............................................................................37 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION Paleozoic Era ...............................................................37 R. A. Smith, State Geologist Cambrian Period.................................................... 37 Lake Superior Time....................................................37 Publication 38. Geological Series 32 Ordovician Period .................................................. 37 OIL AND GAS FIELDS OF MICHIGAN Ozarkian Time............................................................37 Canadian Time...........................................................37 A DISCUSSION OF DEPOSITIONAL AND STRUCTURAL St. Peter Time ............................................................37 FEATURES OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN Trenton-Black River Time ..........................................38 Decorah Time.............................................................38 BY ROBERT B. NEWCOMBE Cincinnatian Time ......................................................38 Silurian Period ....................................................... 38 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE Cataract Time.............................................................38 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF Niagaran Time............................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Ann Arbor Quadrangle
    DESCRIPTION OF THE ANN ARBOR QUADRANGLE. By I. C. Russell and Frank Leverett." GEOGRAPHY. kames, eskers, outwash aprons, basins, till plains, moraine to the first well-defined moraine south­ draining a large part of Wayne County, also drains gravel plains are noted and described in the dis­ east of it. In addition to the features mentioned, a narrow area along the eastern border of the north­ CIVIC RELATIONS. cussion of the glacial geology, and therefore atten­ this district is traversed by several lines of glacial ern half of the Ann Arbor quadrangle. The Ann Arbor quadrangle, embracing an area tion is here directed only to certain strongly marked drainage that lead northwestward into the interlo­ Lakes. Within the limits of the quadrangle of 884.85 square miles, is in the southeastern part topographic belts. These belts, named in order bate belt. These are much broader than the depres­ there are nearly 150 small bodies of standing of the Southern Peninsula of Michigan, the city of from east to west, are (1) the lake plain; (2) the sions just noted, being in some places more than a water which occupy basins of sufficient depth to Ann Arbor being near its geographic center. It morainic system on the western border of the mile wide, and are filled with flat-surfaced deposits be debarred from ready drainage. Some of these is bounded by parallels 42° and 42° 30' north lati­ lake plain; (3) the interrnorainic strips with nearly of sand and gravel left by the streams that formed bodies are without outlet; others discharge to tude and meridians 83° 30' and 84° west longitude, plane surfaces; (4) the interlobate moraine, with its them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologically Rich Areas
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................... Page 1.1 Selected Reference Materials ............................................................. Page 1.4 Indiana Map of Indiana Ecologically Rich Areas Northwest Indiana ..................................................................... Page 1.5 Central Indiana ....................................................................... Page 1.14 Southeast Indiana .................................................................... Page 1.17 Southwest Indiana .................................................................... Page 1.19 Northeast Indiana .................................................................... Page 1.21 Appendix A - Northwest Indiana Protected Natural Areas ..................... Page 1.12 Appendix B - Northwest Indiana Agencies, Organizations, Universities and Corporations ..................................... Page 1.13 Ohio Map of Ohio Ecologically Rich Areas Central Ohio ......................................................................... Page 1.23 East Central Ohio ..................................................................... Page 1.25 West Central Ohio ..................................................................... Page 1.27 South Ohio .......................................................................... Page 1.30 Northeast Ohio ....................................................................... Page 1.32 Northwest Ohio .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo and Niagara River Habitat Inventory and Assessment
    Buffalo and Niagara Rivers Habitat Assessment and Conservation Framework Prepared for: Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper 1250 Niagara Street Buffalo, New York 14213 www.bnriverkeeper.org Prepared by: Margaret Wooster: Project Director and Writer: Lisa Matthies: GIS Specialist: November 2008 Technical Advisory Group Barry Boyer, Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper Valerie Cromie, Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority/Niagara River RAP Mark Filipski, NYS Dept.of Environmental Conservation, Niagara River RAP Patti Fischer, Tuscarora Environmental Program Paul Fuhrmann, riparian restoration specialist Chuck Godfrey, Erie County Federation of Sportsmen Michael Hamilton, Buffalo Ornithological Society Evelyn Hicks, West Seneca Commission for Conservation of the Environment Bill Hudson, Buffalo Audubon Society Kim Irvine, Buffalo State, Department of Geography and Planning Jill Jedlicka, Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Buffalo River RAP Coordinator Paul McKeown, NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, fisheries biologist Michael Wilkinson, NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, fisheries biologist Neil Patterson, Jr., Tuscarora Environmental Program Mary Perrelli, Buffalo State, Department of Geography and Planning Chris Renschler, State University of NY at Buffalo, Dept. of Geography/GIS Rene Rickard, Tuscarora Environmental Program Ken Roblee, NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, wildlife biologist Byron Rupp, US Army Corps of Engineers Lynda Schneekloth, Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper David Spiering, Tifft Nature Preserve Patricia Szarpa, Western New
    [Show full text]