Human Sperm Cryopreservation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human Sperm Cryopreservation 21 Human Sperm Cryopreservation Alex C Varghese, Parag Nandi, Reda Mahfouz, Kelly S Athayde, Ashok Agarwal ABSTRACT Human sperm cryopreservation has become widely accepted in our society. It has been proven to be a very successful method to keep the hope of a family alive for many men. In early 1940s cattle breeders started cryopreserving bull semen. The cryopreservation of human semen started in 1950s with more refined techniques designed for human sperm. Since then continuous ongoing research has developed more sophisticated techniques for human semen cryopreservation. This chapter is an introduction to the human sperm cryopreservation, the latest techniques of the sperm cryopreservation and its significance in assisted reproductive techniques. SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION: HISTORY Efforts to maintain the fertilizing capacity of mammalian spermatozoa for extended times have been made for at least 135 years. Having observed survival of human spermatozoa that had been cooled to –150°C in 1866, an Italian physician P. Mantegazza proposed the concept of a human sperm bank to store semen specimens.1 Since the birth of Louise Brown, the first test tube baby in the world on 25th July, 1978 by the pioneering work of Dr Robert Edwards and Dr Patrick Steptoe, it has been reported that three million babies have been born by assisted reproductive technology (ART). Human sperm cryopreservation has become a routine procedure since then in any assisted reproductive technology laboratories. SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION: SIGNIFICANCE Cryopreservation is widely used in many assisted reproductive programs to preserve male fertility, for example, before cytotoxic chemotherapy,2 radiotherapy, or certain surgical treatments that may lead to testicular HUMAN SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION 339 failure or ejaculatory dysfunction. Freezing of sperm before initiation of treatment provides patients “fertility insurance” and may allow them to father their own children through the use of intrauterine Insemination or in vitro Fertilization techniques such as intra cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cryopreservation of sperm is mandatory in donor-insemination programs. The use of frozen semen allows screening of donors for infectious diseases such as HIV and hepatitis B before release for insemination.3-6 Cryopreservation is also widely used for storage of sperm retrieved from azoospermic patients who have undergone testicular sperm extraction or percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), avoiding the need of repeated biopsies or aspiration. SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION: PURPOSE At present, the most commonly used cryofreezing procedures are in propylene straws/vials of different sizes and volumes and it has been documented by several researchers.7-9 Several studies have aimed to find correlations between different parameters of frozen-thawed semen and fertility in several species including stallions. Unfortunately, so far, no single in vitro parameter has been identified to predict fertility. Sperm motility is the most commonly used criterion for evaluating quality of cryopreserved semen. It has been found that Computer Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) is sufficient for clinical use in crucial individual motility patterns.10-12 Nevertheless it may be inadequate for determining an individual’s fertility as only motility evaluation does not predict the fertility potential of the sperm cells. Different probes have been used to measure sperm viability and acrosome reaction in different species.13-15 It has been argued that such patients undergoing procedures that may lead to testicular failure or ejaculatory dysfunction should be offered cryopreservation of semen.16 Although in 1980 Braken and Smith reported that only 4% of patients had semen of suitable quality for a fertility program,17 the advent of ICSI overcame these limitations, it allows even low quality samples to be used successfully.18 Regarding the safety of the cryopreservation techniques, questions about the possibility of cross contamination through the liquid nitrogen could be raised. Hepatitis C virus has a low rate of sexual and intra-familial transmission,19 and till date there is not a single case report where it has been found to be transmitted by stored bone marrow or semen. Some studies of semen, saliva, and vaginal secretions in HCV-positive patients have failed to find HCV RNA.20,21 It is believed that semen samples may have very small viral load that would not survive even the liquefaction time. HCV is 340 ANDROLOGY LABORATORY MANUAL a RNA virus and only have RNA dependent RNA polymerase to reverse transcript to RNA strand only, which are not at all stable and can not be integrated to host DNA. A case of DNA virus hepatitis B acquired from stored bone marrow was recently described22 and hence awareness is required for all potentially transmissible agents. With isolated storage facilities now provided, all patients who are positive for antibody to hepatitis C virus should be able to preserve their long term fertility. Within the many reasons for sperm cryopreservation, this technique could assist the male partner in an IVF couple in the following situations: concern about the stress of the collection of semen on demand, any history of poor specimens collected for IVF, traveling husband (not available at the particular time of the insemination) or in case of oligozoospermic samples, when collection of more than one ejaculate are pooled for IUI/ IVF. Spermatozoa cryopre-servation is also of interest for maintaining genetic diversity in endangered species, especially those in zoological parks which are candidate species for captive breeding programs.23 CRYOPROTECTANTS: INDICATIONS In 1938, the survival of human spermatozoa stored at the temperature of solid carbon dioxide was reported. Despite this finding, it was not possible to start using cryopreserved semen in breeding programs until a considerable observation taken up by Parkes in 1945.24 The single most important development came with the significant discovery by Polge, Smith, and Parkes in 194925 that glycerol could act as a cryoprotectant for spermatozoa. The initial experiments with glycerol were performed using fowl spermatozoa but were quickly followed by the successful preservation of bull spermatozoa26 with the first calf from Artificial Insemination using frozen/thawed spermatozoa reported in 195l.27 The use of glycerol had allowed bull spermatozoa to survive at the comparatively slow freezing rates obtained using methanol cooled with solid CO2, and with semen contained in large glass-freezing ampoules. Effective cryoprotectants are preferentially excluded from proteins; thereby it is more stabilized and avoids unfolding or denaturation.28 Such cryoprotectants are hydrophobic enough to pass cell membranes easily and would be hydrophilic enough to readily mix with water. If the cryoprotectants are toxic then it may act more by hydrogen-bonding with water than by colligative interference with ice formation. It implies that understanding the molecular mechanisms of the toxicity of cryoprotective agents would be an important advance step toward finding means of reducing toxicity. Cryoprotectant toxicity and destabilization of polypeptides in cell membranes have been documented.29 HUMAN SPERM CRYOPRESERVATION 341 In general, cryoprotectant toxicities are lower at lower temperature, and may even become negligible if the cryoprotectants can be introduced at a low enough temperature. The challenges that cells have to overcome to survive after freeze-thaw are not their ability to endure storage at low temperature; rather, it is the lethality of an intermediate zone of temperature (– 15 to – 60°C) that cells must pass through during cooling as well as during warming.30 As the cells approach the freezing temperature, the water outside the cell freezes first, removing liquid solvent from the extracellular broth and resulting in increased intracellular osmolarity. There are two groups of cryoprotectants used in routine cryogenic work. One is cell membrane permeable and another one is membrane non- permeable. Cell membrane permeable cryoprotectants viz. glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and membrane non-permeable cryoprotectants viz. polyhydroxyethyl starch, glycine are being used randomly. At the present time different sugar molecules like glucose, sucrose, raffinose, etc. have also been frequently used as cryoprotectant in routine work.31 Most of these cryoprotectants are used at a concentration of 5 to 10%.32 Among these, glycerol is the most commonly used cryoprotectant for mammalian as well as human spermatozoa.33, 34 Conversely, Jeyendran35 showed that spermatozoa might become dependent on glycerol so that once it is removed, motility rapidly decreases. For the better recovery of the motile cells along with the cryoprotectants several other natural extenders viz. egg yolk, or synthetic extenders viz. Zwitterion buffers containing TRIS [hydroxy-methylaminomethane], TES [N-TRIS (hydroxymethyl) methyleaminoethanesulfonic acid], or combination of these are generally being used routinely.36, 37 Sodium citrate, another substance added to extending buffers, may give better result.38, 39 Nowadays HSPM (Human Sperm Preservation Medium) has become very popular in many laboratories.40, 41 It has been reported that TYB over HSPM gives better result in motility recovery both containing 7% (v/v) glycerol.42 But in a comparative study, TYB in contrast with HSPM can be recommended as a first choice cryoprotectant for semen preservation in order to avoid extra
Recommended publications
  • Cryopreservation of Equine Semen with a Mechanical Control Rate Freezer
    CRYOPRESERVATION OF EQUINE SEMEN WITH A MECHANICAL CONTROL RATE FREEZER By Sossi Marianne Iacovides, B.S. A THESIS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE ApProved Dr. Samuel Prien CHairPerson Dr. Samuel Jackson Dr. Leslie Thompson Dr. Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School December, 2014 Copyright 2014, Sossi Marianne Iacovides, B.S. Texas TecH University, Sossi M. Iacovides, December 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ‘It’s hard to soar with eagles, if you won’t jump off the cliff.’ At the beginning of my graduate school process, I had the choice to start somewhere fresh and new. While it may have been the right move for some, it was not for me; I knew that I wasn’t finished with here. The Department of Animal & Food Sciences has become home, from the abundance of moral, ethical and personal support; it has been a blessing and privilege to spend the past 4 years here. Dr. Glenn Blodgett, you believed in my research, and that means the world to me. Without the access to the 6666 Ranch, and your indisPensible personnel, this project would have never gained flight. Mallory Canaday, the true “Swimmie Specialist,” you were an indispensable resource for me and I have learned more from you then I could have ever imagined. The lab personnel: my countless questions never went unanswered. I hope that you’ll walk the hallways and hear my snaughles forever more. The minions, my fellow graduate students, from the countless nights of studying, to the late night research – I could not have hoped for a better group to have survived these last two years with! Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Sperm Vitrification: the State of the Art Yong Tao*, Erika Sanger, Arpornrad Saewu and Marie-Claude Leveille
    Tao et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (2020) 18:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00580-5 REVIEW Open Access Human sperm vitrification: the state of the art Yong Tao*, Erika Sanger, Arpornrad Saewu and Marie-Claude Leveille Abstract Sperm cryopreservation has been widely used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and has resulted in millions of live births. Two principal approaches have been adopted: conventional (slow) freezing and vitrification. As a traditional technique, slow freezing has been successfully employed and widely used at ART clinics whereas the latter, a process to solidify liquid into an amorphous or glassy state, may become a faster alternative method of sperm cryopreservation with significant benefits in regard to simple equipment and applicability to fertility centers. Sperm vitrification has its own limitations. Firstly, small volume of load is usually plunged to liquid nitrogen to achieve high cooling rate, which makes large volume sample cryopreservation less feasible. Secondly, direct contact with liquid nitrogen increases the potential risk of contamination. Recently, new carriers have been developed to facilitate improved control over the volume and speed, and new strategies have been implemented to minimize the contamination risk. In summary, although sperm vitrification has not yet been applied in routine sperm cryopreservation, its potential as a standard procedure is growing. Keywords: Cryopreservation, Vitrification, Contamination, Liquid nitrogen, Spermatozoa, Semen Background births from frozen sperm after 4 decades storage in LN2 Over 8 decades ago, in 1938, Luyet and Hoddap per- had been reported [6]. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa formed the first vitrification of frog sperm in liquid air has been the most valuable and used way to preserve the [1].
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Bioethical Qualifiers in the Donation of Human Sperm
    Intersect, Vol 14, No 2 (2021) Creating Boundaries in the Sperm Donation Industry: A Study of Bioethical Qualifiers in the Donation of Human Sperm Tanvee Sinha1 1 The University of Alabama at Birmingham While sperm donation has become a common and effective practice amongst many who suffer from the inability to conceive naturally, the practice's bioethical implications may reveal a necessity to place qualifying constrictions on the practice. Some examples of related ethical issues range from psychological impacts on offspring as a result of partial genetic dissociation from parents, and discriminatory practices, such as “shopping” for traits or narrow descriptions of optimal sperm donors. Regulations for eligible donors vary in different regions, while keeping some sort of uniformity through criteria, including height, weight, education, and lifestyle choices. This piece highlights some of the major cultural differences between China and the USA in regard to the regulation of sperm donation. Recently in China, after the “one- child only” policy was lifted, there is an increasing demand for sperm donors now than ever, but with new policies, it is even more difficult to donate and purchase sperm. Due to donors not being able to qualify for the “amount of patriotism” needed, there is an increased use of underground operations, such as the black market. These operations are often unsafe and have no regulation, encouraged by donors and middlemen solely seeking monetary value. Sinha, Boundaries in Sperm Donation Background In the twentieth century, there has been a rapid advancement in technology, causing numerous innovative ways for one to now have a child.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Guide
    MEMBER GUIDE Understanding Your Progyny Benefit 2019 PLAN YEAR YOUR GUIDE TO PROGYNY’S FERTILITY AND FAMILY BUILDING BENEFIT At Progyny, we know the road to parenthood can be challenging — we were founded by people who’ve faced obstacles to fertility first-hand. That’s why we partner with the nation’s leading fertility specialists to bring you a smarter approach with better care and more successful outcomes. Our benefit is designed so that more options are available to anyone who wants to have a child, no matter their path to parenthood. The Progyny benefit is designed to assist covered employees and their partners who want to have a child, including LGBTQ+ individuals and couples, and single parents by choice. Your benefit also provides coverage for fertility preservation (egg or sperm freezing), which allows you to build a family when you’re ready. We created this guide to provide you with all the information you’ll need to get the most out of your benefit. We understand the journey to become a parent can be physically, emotionally, and financially challenging. With this in mind, we’ve designed your benefit to include comprehensive treatment coverage, access to the highest level of care, and personalized emotional support. We’re here to ensure you have a healthy, timely, and supported family building journey. Personalized Guidance Unlimited guidance and dedicated support from Comprehensive Coverage a patient care advocate throughout your fertility Bundled fertility treatment coverage journey. for every unique path to parenthood. Premier Specialists Convenient access to the largest national network of fertility experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Egg Donation: a Comparative Analysis of Reproductive Technologies in the United States and United Kingdom
    FOUR REGULATING EGG DONATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE UNITED STATES AND UNITED KINGDOM Michelle Sargent While rapid scientific development of egg donation technology has made it possible to elude infertility and to expand options for means of procreation, it has also thrust policy makers advanced societies in the midst of a raging debate that involves several ethical concerns. This paper describes and contrasts the respective regulatory approaches of the United States and the United Kingdom towards egg donation, and explores their potential implications for policy making in both countries. Michelle Sargent is currently pursuing her masters at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan, with a concentration in energy, climate change, and environmental policy. Prior to returning to school to pursue her masters, Ms. Sargent worked at an environmental consulting firm on several different projects, including a new business model to reduce chemical usage and hazardous waste in chemical manufacturing firms, and a philanthropic collaborative to promote sustainable food systems in California. She also coordinated grant administration to small Latino nonprofits with a foundation affinity group. Ms. Sargent was named a Morris K. Udall scholar in environment in 2000 and received her Bachelor of Arts from Vassar College. Michigan Journal of Public Affairs – Volume 4, Spring 2007 The Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy – The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor www.mjpa.umich.edu Regulating Egg Donation: A Comparative Analysis 2 INTRODUCTION Procreation is a fundamental human drive. The image of happy parents holding a healthy baby pervades our society, from Gerber commercials to TV sitcoms.
    [Show full text]
  • 13D. OBGYN and Fertility Care for LGBTQIA+ Persons
    Reproductive Care and Obstetrics for LGBTQIA+ Individuals Rebekah P. Viloria MD, FACOG Fenway Health Obstetrics & Gynecology Advancing Excellence in Sexual and Gender Minority Health Conference March 22,2020 DIsclosures ▪ I have no financial disclosures Objective Incorporate reproductive counseling into routine care Understand the potential effects of Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy on fertility Counsel on reproductive choices for family building Clinical Case #1 ▪ 35 y.o. lesbian desiring pregnancy ▪ PMH: Anxiety, BMI 26 ▪ PGynH: No abnormal pap or STI; monogamous with cis female ▪ FH: No birth defects or intellectual disabilities ▪ SH: No alcohol, tobacco, drugs. No recent travel; employed; married Pregnancy ▪ Reciprocal IVF ▪ -partner’s egg + anonymous donor sperm ▪ Aneuploidy testing of embryo ▪ Pan ethnic testing for both patient and partner Antepartum ▪ Immunizations up to date ▪ EPDS=5 ▪ Low risk aneuploidy testing ▪ Normal fetal survey ▪ Normal testing for gestational diabetes ▪ Working with doula ▪ Attended childbirth classes ▪ Created birthing preference plan Delivery ▪ Gestational hypertension at 40 wks ▪ Intrapartum severe hypertension ▪ Cesarean delivery for 2nd stage arrest ▪ Female bodied baby, 8# 2 oz, Apgars 8,9 ▪ Clear drapes ▪ Partner, Skin to skin in OR ▪ Postpartum breastfeeding Family Equality Council (2019) LGBTQ Family Building Survey. https://www.f amilyequality.o rg/fbs Reproductive Wish ▪ Survey of 50 transmen after GRS ▪ 22% participants already had children ▪ 8 had partners conceived with donor sperm ▪ 3 conceived prior to GRS ▪ 54% were interested in having children at time of study ▪ 37.5% would have considered fertility preservation if available ▪ Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Pennings G, Elaut E, Dedecker D, Van de Peer F, et al. Reproductive wish in transsexual men.
    [Show full text]
  • What Women Want in Their Sperm Donor: a Study of More Than 1000
    Economics and Human Biology 23 (2016) 1–9 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Economics and Human Biology journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ehb What women want in their sperm donor: A study of more than 1000 women’s sperm donor selections a, b c Stephen Whyte *, Benno Torgler , Keith L. Harrison a School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia b School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia; and CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Switzerland c Queensland Fertility Group (QFG), Australia A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Received 28 March 2016 Reproductive medicine and commercial sperm banking have facilitated an evolutionary shift in how Received in revised form 24 May 2016 women are able to choose who fathers their offspring, by notionally expanding women’s opportunity set Accepted 12 June 2016 beyond former constraints. This study analyses 1546 individual reservations of semen by women from a Available online 16 June 2016 private Australian assisted reproductive health facility across a ten year period from 2006 to 2015. Using the time that each sample was available at the facility until reservation, we explore women’s preference JEL classification: for particular male characteristics. We find that younger donors, and those who hold a higher formal J13 education compared to those with no academic qualifications are more quickly selected for reservation D10 by women.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Your Family at Northwestern Medicine Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Northwestern Medicine Building Your Family
    Building Your Family at Northwestern Medicine Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Northwestern Medicine Building Your Family Building your family Northwestern Medicine Fertility and Reproductive Medicine takes pride in helping all individuals and couples build their families. Procreation is a natural desire for many individuals and our faculty and staff provide an inclusive and supportive environment to all of our patients undergoing fertility treatment. We understand that family building can be an emotional and sometimes stressful process and we will be there to help guide you on your path to parenthood. We are a successful fertility program offering comprehensive services in downtown Chicago. Our There are many paths to parenthood for same-sex physicians, and other members of our team, are sensitive couples. We offer a full array of family-building strategies, to patient’s goals and needs, and steadfast in our support including artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, egg of all of our patients. We will help you fulfill your family and sperm donation, and gestational surrogacy. building dreams. Visit womenshealthcommunity.nm.org to share your stories and ask a fertility question from one of our medical experts. 2 Northwestern Medicine Building Your Family Reproductive options Options for lesbian women/couples partner’s eggs to create embryos to be fertilized with Lesbian women/couples may undergo treatment with donor sperm and then transferred into the other partner’s artificial insemination (Intrauterine Insemination; IUI), uterus. using sperm from a known donor or from a sperm donor identified through a sperm bank. IUI is a relatively simple Options for gay men/couples and painless treatment that is either performed with or Gay men/couples may choose to work with a gestational without the patient taking hormone medications.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Half-Siblings? Sperm Donation Creates Superfamilies by Madeleine White
    September 6, 2011 150 half-siblings? Sperm donation creates superfamilies By Madeleine White Critics say sperm banks need to be regulated to prevent accidental incest and a shrinking gene pool Imagine telling a child that she is the product of a sperm donor. Now imagine telling her that, also, she has up to 150 siblings. A piece in The New York Times [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/health/06donor.html? _r=1&pagewanted=all&src=ismr_ap_lo_mst_fb] examines the growing trend of half-siblings across the United States as sperm banks dole out copious amounts of samples from the same, popular donors. Not only does this cause concerns for scientists – who worry about a shrinking gene pool and the possibility of unnatural propagation of rare genetic disorders – but also for parents who suddenly realize that their family has grown exponentially. One unforeseen consequence is that accidental incest is a real possibility. One mother has informed her daughter of her donor's number in case the girl ever decides to become intimate with another sperm-donor child. "She's been in school with numerous kids who were born through donors. She's had crushes on boys who are donor children. It's become part of [her]sex education," the unnamed California mom said. Critics [http://feministing.com/2011/09/06/should-artificial-insemination-be-regulated] see this as one of many reasons why sperm banks need to be regulated legally. (In Canada there is some regulation [http://www.ahrc-pac.gc.ca/v2/index-eng.php], including a national registry of personal health information
    [Show full text]
  • Should the U.S. Approve Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy?
    SHOULD THE U.S. APPROVE MITOCHONDRIAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY? An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By: ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Daniela Barbery Emily Caron Daniel Eckler IQP-43-DSA-6594 IQP-43-DSA-7057 IQP-43-DSA-5020 ____________________ ____________________ Benjamin Grondin Maureen Hester IQP-43-DSA-5487 IQP-43-DSA-2887 August 27, 2015 APPROVED: _________________________ Prof. David S. Adams, PhD WPI Project Advisor 1 ABSTRACT The overall goal of this project was to document and evaluate the new technology of mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), and to assess its technical, ethical, and legal problems to help determine whether MRT should be approved in the U.S. We performed a review of the current research literature and conducted interviews with academic researchers, in vitro fertility experts, and bioethicists. Based on the research performed for this project, our team’s overall recommendation is that the FDA approve MRT initially for a small number of patients, and follow their offspring’s progress closely for a few years before allowing the procedure to be done on a large scale. We recommend the FDA approve MRT only for treating mitochondrial disease, and recommend assigning parental rights only to the two nuclear donors. In medical research, animal models are useful but imperfect, and in vitro cell studies cannot provide information on long-term side-effects, so sometimes we just need to move forward with closely monitored human experiments. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page ……………………………….……………………………………..……. 01 Abstract …………………………………………………………………..…………. 02 Table of Contents ………………………………………………………………..… 03 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………..…….
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Donors and Donor Siblings: a Comparison of the Perceptions of Donor-Conceived Offspring in Lesbian- Parent and Heterosexual-Parent Families
    Making Sense of Donors and Donor Siblings: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Donor-Conceived Offspring in Lesbian- Parent and Heterosexual-Parent Families Submitted to Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, Volume 13, Theme: “Visions of the 21st Century Family: Transforming Structures and Identities.” Eds. S. L. Blair and P. N. Claster Emerald Group Publishing Limited (in press, 2013) Margaret K. Nelson Department of Sociology and Anthropology Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 U.S.A. [email protected] Rosanna Hertz Wellesley College Department of Sociology Wellesley, MA 02481 U.S.A. [email protected] Wendy Kramer Donor Sibling Registry Box 1571 Nederland, CO 80466 U.S.A. [email protected] NOTICE: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. Please contact the authors for the final version. 1 MAKING SENSE OF DONORS AND DONOR SIBLINGS: A COMPARISON OF THE PERCEPTIONS OF DONOR-CONCEIVED OFFSPRING IN LESBIAN-PARENT AND HETEROSEXUAL-PARENT FAMILIES Margaret K. Nelson, Rosanna Hertz, and Wendy Kramer1 For most heterosexual families baby making has been an easy and often accidental occurrence. Yet, this is not the case for all heterosexual families; nor, of course is it the case for new forms of family headed by single mothers by choice, lesbians and gay men (Sullivan, 2004; Hertz, 2006, Gamson, 2011). Across the spectrum of family types, individuals – both alone and as members of couples – have turned to many different approaches to having a child.
    [Show full text]
  • Sperm Donor Catalog Fall 2014 – Winter 2015 Table of Contents This Catalog Provides Basic Information and Characteristics for Our Qualified Donors
    Sperm Donor Catalog Fall 2014 – Winter 2015 Table of Contents This catalog provides basic information and characteristics for our qualified donors. Please consider it a general guide rather than a list of available vials, as donors are regularly added to and retired from our roster. Additional information including regularly updated vial availability can be found at europeanspermbankusa.com » Getting Started 4 Donor Information & Availability Open ID Donors Specimen Types 5 » Access Pass » Quality at ESB-USA 6 IUI (motile cells) & ICI (motile cells) & cost » Shipping Comparison 7 12 » What is CMV? Why is this important regarding pregnancy? 8 » Profiles to Pregnancy: Your Guide to Purchasing Vials How does this affect my donor sperm choice? Find and Purchase Information on Your Favorite Donors What type of CMV testing do sperm donors go through? Fill Out Related Paperwork | Place Your Order for Donor Sperm . Specializing in Open Identity Donors Vial Exchange & Buy Back Program 14 » 9 » What is an Open ID Donor? Donor Sperm Definitions, Preparation Methods and Vial Types What does this mean for your child? Consult Your Physician | Demystifying Methods of Insemination What does this mean for your donor? 10 » Insemination Methods–Explained » Donor Process Home Insemination | IVF 16 » Donor Screening 18 Initially our donors are selected based on parameters 35 » More Ways to Save 36 » Accreditations & Licenses » Tell Us Your News 38 Reporting your pregnancy 39 » Testimonials What is CMV? Why is this important regarding pregnancy? How does this affect my donor sperm choice? What type of CMV testing do sperm donors go through? Specializing in Open Identity Donors What is an Open ID Donor? What does this mean for your child? What does this mean for your donor? Donor Process Donor Screening Initially our donors are selected based on parameters More Ways to Save Accreditations & Licenses Tell Us Your News Reporting your pregnancy Testimonials Getting Started Donor Information Open ID Donors European Sperm Bank USA offers extensive information on our donors.
    [Show full text]