DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent Academic Repository Full Text Document (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kent Academic Repository Full Text Document (Pdf) Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Pendry, Richard (2011) Sub-contracting newsgathering in Iraq. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics, 8 (3/4). pp. 14-20. ISSN 1742-0105. DOI Link to record in KAR http://kar.kent.ac.uk/63466/ Document Version Publisher pdf Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html ethical space The International Journal of Communication Ethics Vol.8 Nos.3/4 2011 ISSN 1742-0105 PAPERS t Jackie Newton: The knock at the door: Considering bereaved families’ varying responses to news media intrusion t Richard Pendry: Sub-contracting newsgathering in Iraq t Justin Schlosberg: Covering the cover-up: The Hutton report in UK television news t Peter Simmons: Competent, dependable and respectful: Football refereeing as a model for communicating fairness t Margalit Toledano and Levarna Fay Wolland: Ethics 2.0: Social media implications for professional communicators PLUS Views and reviews Publishing Office Aims and scope Abramis Academic, ASK House, Northgate Avenue, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP32 Communication ethics is a discipline that supports communication practitioners by 6BB, UK offering tools and analyses for the understanding of ethical issues. Moreover, the Tel: +44 (0)1284 700321 speed of change in the dynamic information environment presents new challenges, Fax: +44 (0)1284 717889 especially for communication practitioners. Email: [email protected] Web: www.abramis.co.uk Ethics used to be a specialist subject situated within schools of philosophy. Today it Copyright is viewed as a language and systematic thought process available to everyone. It All rights reserved. No part of encompasses issues of care and trust, social responsibility and environmental concern this publication may be repro- and identifies the values necessary to balance the demands of performance today duced in any material form with responsibilities tomorrow. (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means, and whether For busy professionals, CE is a powerful learning and teaching approach that encour- or not transiently or inciden- ages analysis and engagement with many constituencies, enhancing relationships tally to some other use of this through open-thinking. It can be used to improve organization performance as well publication) without the writ- as to protect individual well-being. ten permission of the copy- right owner, except in accor- dance with the provisions of Submissions the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under Papers should be submitted to the Editor via email. Full details on submission – along terms of a licence issued by with detailed notes for authors – are available online in PDF format: the Copyright Licensing www.communication-ethics.net Agency Ltd, 33-34, Alfred Place, London WC1E 7DP, UK. Applications for the copyright Subscription Information owner’s permission to repro- duce part of this publication Each volume contains 4 issues, issued quarterly. Enquiries regarding subscriptions should be addressed to the and orders both in the UK and overseas should be sent to: Publishers. Back issues Journals Fulfilment Department Back issues are available from Abramis Academic, ASK House, Northgate Avenue, Bury St. Edmunds, the Publishers at the above Suffolk IP32 6BB, UK. editorial address. Tel: +44 (0)1284 700321, Fax: +44 (0)1284 717889 © 2011 Institute of Email: [email protected] Communication Ethics & Abramis Academic Your usual suscription agency will also be able to take a subscription to Ethical Space. ISSN 1742-0105 Annual Subscription ISBN 978-1-84549-517-6 Membership of the Institute of Communication Ethics includes a subscription to the Printed in the UK. journal. Please see the application form on the last page of this issue. For non-members: Institutional subscription £200.00 Personal subscription £55.00 Delivery by surface mail. Airmail prices available on request or at the journal’s web site. www.communication-ethics.net Contents Editorial Page 2 Views Barry Turner on the ethical issues surrounding the representation of Osama bin Laden – both dead and alive Page 4 Jane Chapman and Nick Nuttall argue that contemporary ethical controversies cannot be understood without placing them in their historical context Page 5 Papers Jackie Newton: The knock at the door: Considering bereaved families’ varying responses to news media intrusion Page 7 Richard Pendry: Sub-contracting newsgathering in Iraq Page 14 Justin Schlosberg: Covering the cover-up: The Hutton report in UK television news Page 21 Peter Simmons: Competent, dependable and respectful: Football refereeing as a model for communicating fairness Page 33 Margalit Toledano and Levarna Fay Wolland: Ethics 2.0: Social media implications for professional communicators Page 43 Reviews Clifford Christians on Tom W. Cooper’s Fast media, media fast Page 53 Barnie Choudhury on Sheila Gunn’s So you want to be a political journalist? Page 55 Editorial Board Joint Editors Paul Jackson Manchester Business School Richard Lance Keeble University of Lincoln Mike Jempson Director, MediaWise Trust Donald Matheson University of Canterbury, New Zealand Cheris Kramarae University of Oregon; Centre for Shannon Bowen Syracuse University the Study of Women in Society Takeshi Maezawa Former Yomiuri ombudsman, Reviews Editors scholar/writer Mary Griffiths University of Adelaide John Mair Coventry University John Tulloch University of Lincoln Ian Mayes Former Guardian Readers’ Editor Tessa Mayes Investigative Journalist Editorial board members Jolyon Mitchell University of Edinburgh Klaus-Dieter Altmeppen Catholic University Fuad Nahdi Publisher Q-news; Producer Channel 4 Eichstaett-Ingolstadt Sarah Niblock Brunel University Raphael Alvira University of Navarra Kaarle Nordenstreng Tampere University Dusan Babic Media plan, Sarajevo Manuel Parez i Maicas Universitat Autonoma Porfiro Barroso Computense University of Madrid & de Barcelona Pontifical University of Salamanca, Madrid Ian Richards University of South Australia, Adelaide Jay Black Editor, Journal of Mass Media Ethics Simon Rogerson De Montfort University Antonio Castillo University of Western Sydney Lorna Roth Concordia University, Montreal Contact: ICE Administrator, Ruth Chadwick Lancaster University Karen Sanders San Pablo University, Madrid Katherine Hill, Faculty of Media, Business and Saviour Chircop University of Malta John Strain Unversity of Surrey Marketing, Leeds Trinity Clifford Christians University of Illinois-Urbana, USA Miklos Sukosd Central European University, Budapest and All Saints, Brownberrie Raphael Cohen–Almagor University of Hull Barbara Thomass Ruhruniversität Bochum Lane, Horsforth, Leeds, LS18 Tom Cooper Emerson College, Boston, MA Terry Threadgold Centre for Journalism Studies, 5HD, UK Deni Elliott University of Montana Cardiff University Published by: The Institute Chris Frost Liverpool John Moores University Stephen J. Ward University of British Columbia of Communication Ethics (www.communication-ethics.net) Ted Glasser Stanford University Brian Winston University of Lincoln and Abramis Academic Anne Gregory Leeds Metropolitan University James Winter University of Windsor, Canada (www.abramis.co.uk) Cees Hamelink University of Amsterdam EDITORIAL BOARD & CONTENTS Copyright 2011-3/4. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. All rights reserved. Vol 8, No 3/4 2011 1 EDITORIAL ‘Press self regulation in the UK is as dead in the water as a wooden duck in an MP’s pond’ Picture the scene. One of the main streets of a tropical paradise – Guyana. An Old Colonial Club. Mid morning. I am riveted to my laptop and a live feed of an old man and a young buck testifying to a British parliamentary select committee. Why? Because today, 19 July 2011, 82-year-old Rupert Murdoch, the most powerful media magnate of our time, and his 39-year-old son and presumed heir James Murdoch are giving evidence to the House of Commons select committee on culture, media and sport hearing on phone hacking. The whole world is watching – even in Guyana. Rupert is playing the old man who cannot comprehend and is full of remorse (but with a young wife and several consigliere behind to support) whilst James (‘Mr USA MBA’) is playing the know-it-all and interpreter for the old codger. This is unmissable wall-to-wall viewing even in the tropical heat. ‘Hackgate’ or the phone hacking scandal pulled the Murdoch empire apart at the seams this summer. It could yet lead to its demise. What started as a small fire – News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman and his private investigator Glenn Mulcaire being detained at Her Majesty’s pleasure in 2007 for hacking into the phones of the Royal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Caught in the Net
    Caught in the Net An analysis of the Guardian’s first venture into online journalism Simen Hunding Strømme Master Thesis in Modern International and Transnational History Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Spring 2020 Caught in the Net An analysis of the Guardian’s first venture into online journalism i © 2020 Simen Hunding Strømme Caught in the Net An analysis of the Guardian’s first venture into online journalism Simen Hunding Strømme www.duo.uio.no ii Abstract This thesis examines the early period of internet journalism in Britain between 1993 and 2001. By undertaking a qualitative case study of London based newspaper, the Guardian, the thesis explores how newspapers started to consider online journalism as not only a new way of doing business, but as a completely new genre of journalism. In 1998, the Guardian was ranked the ninth biggest among twelve national daily newspapers in terms of circulation, but by 2001 its website was the most popular newspaper website in the country. The Guardian’s venture into online journalism began in 1995, when a team of developer known as the New Media Lab was tasked to develop a strategy for online publishing. Over the next few years, several web projects were launched, with varying level of success before pinnacling in a network of websites, Guardian Unlimited in 1999. The increasingly larger focus on the internet as both a tool and platform for publishing, which did not unfold without discontent and critique from advocates of traditional news making, changed the way the Guardian and other newspapers saw their media product and themselves as a company.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hazlitt Review
    THE HAZLITT REVIEW The Hazlitt Review is an annual peer-reviewed journal, the first internationally to be devoted to Hazlitt studies. The Review aims to promote and maintain Hazlitt’s standing, both in the academy and to a wider readership, by providing a forum for new writing on Hazlitt, by established scholars as well as more recent entrants in the field. Editor Uttara Natarajan Assistant Editors James Whitehead, Philipp Hunnekuhl Editorial Board Geoffrey Bindman Tim Milnes David Bromwich James Mulvihill Jon Cook Seamus Perry Gregory Dart Michael Simpson A.C. Grayling Fiona Stafford Paul Hamilton John Whale Ian Mayes Duncan Wu We invite essays of 4,000 to 9,000 words in length on any aspect of William Hazlitt’s work and life; articles relating Hazlitt to wider Romantic circles, topics, or discourses are also expressly welcome, as are reviews of books pertaining to such matters. Contributions should follow the MHRA style and should be sent by email to James Whitehead ([email protected]) or Philipp Hunnekuhl ([email protected]). Submissions will be considered year- round, but must be received by 1 April to be considered for publication in the same year’s Review. We regret that we cannot publish material already published or submitted elsewhere. Contributors who require their articles to be open access (under the RCUK policy effective from 1 April 2013) should indicate this, and they will be made freely available on the Hazlitt Society’s website on publication. Subscriptions, including annual membership of the Hazlitt Society, are £10 (individual) or £15 (corporate or institution) per annum.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism Studies Key Con Journalism 26/4/05 1:14 Pm Page Ii
    BOB FRANKLIN, MARTIN HAMER, MARK HANNA, MARIE KINSEY & JOHN E. RICHARDSON concepts key Key Concepts in Journalism SAGE Studies Key Con Journalism 26/4/05 1:14 pm Page i Key Concepts in Journalism Studies Key Con Journalism 26/4/05 1:14 pm Page ii Recent volumes include: Key Concepts in Social Research Geoff Payne and Judy Payne Fifty Key Concepts in Gender Studies Jane Pilcher and Imelda Whelehan Key Concepts in Medical Sociology Jonathan Gabe, Mike Bury and Mary Ann Elston Key Concepts in Leisure Studies David Harris Key Concepts in Critical Social Theory Nick Crossley Key Concepts in Urban Studies Mark Gottdiener and Leslie Budd Key Concepts in Mental Health David Pilgrim The SAGE Key Concepts series provides students with accessible and authoritative knowledge of the essential topics in a variety of ii disciplines. Cross-referenced throughout, the format encourages critical evaluation through understanding. Written by experienced and respected academics, the books are indispensable study aids and guides to comprehension. Key Con Journalism 26/4/05 1:14 pm Page iii BOB FRANKLIN, MARTIN HAMER, MARK HANNA, MARIE KINSEY AND JOHN E. RICHARDSON Key Concepts in Journalism Studies SAGE Publications London G Thousand Oaks G New Delhi Key Con Journalism 26/4/05 1:14 pm Page iv © Bob Franklin, Martin Hamer, Mark Hanna, Marie Kinsey and John E. Richardson 2005 First published 2005 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form, or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue
    ethical space The International Journal of Communication Ethics Vol.15 Nos.3/4 2018 ISSN 1742-0105 Special Issue: The ethics of the journalistic memoir: Radical departures Edited by Sue Joseph PAPERS • Lara Pawson’s genre-bending memoir – gravitas and the celebration of unique cultural spaces – by Richard Lance Keeble • When journalism isn’t enough: ‘Horror surrealism’ in Behrouz Boochani’s testimonial prison narrative – by Willa McDonald • On being unfair: The ethics of the memoir-journalism hybrid – by Lisa A. Phillips • Stan Grant and cultural memory: Embodying a national race narrative through memoir – by Sue Joseph PLUS • Liberal mass media and the ‘Israel lobby’ theory – by T. J. Coles • Media trust and use among urban news consumers in Brazil – by Flávia Milhorance and Jane Singer • Balancing instrumental rationality and value rationality in communicating information: A study of the ‘Nobel Older Brother’ case – by Lili Ning www.abramis.co.uk abramis • Dumbs gone to Iceland: (Re)presentations of English national identity during Euro 2016 and the EU referendum – by Roger Domeneghetti • ‘An eye in the eye of the hurricane’: Fire and fury, immersion and ethics in political literary journalism – by Kerrie Davies abramis academic • The science communication challenge: Truth and disagreement www.abramis.co.uk in democratic knowledge societies – by Gitte Meyer Publishing Office Aims and scope Abramis Academic ASK House Communication ethics is a discipline that supports communication Northgate Avenue practitioners by offering tools and analyses for the understanding of Bury St. Edmunds ethical issues. Moreover, the speed of change in the dynamic information Suffolk environment presents new challenges, especially for communication IP32 6BB practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking News
    BREAKING NEWS First published in Great Britain in 2018 by Canongate Books Ltd, 14 High Street, Edinburgh EH1 1TE canongate.co.uk This digital edition first published in 2018 by Canongate Books Copyright © Alan Rusbridger, 2018 The moral right of the author has been asserted British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available on request from the British Library ISBN 978 1 78689 093 1 Export ISBN 978 1 78689 094 8 eISBN 978 1 78689 095 5 To Lindsay and Georgina who, between them, shared most of this journey Contents Introduction 1. Not Bowling Alone 2. More Than a Business 3. The New World 4. Editor 5. Shedding Power 6. Guardian . Unlimited 7. The Conversation 8. Global 9. Format Wars 10. Dog, Meet Dog 11. The Future Is Mutual 12. The Money Question 13. Bee Information 14. Creaking at the Seams 15. Crash 16. Phone Hacking 17. Let Us Pay? 18. Open and Shut 19. The Gatekeepers 20. Members? 21. The Trophy Newspaper 22. Do You Love Your Country? 23. Whirlwinds of Change Epilogue Timeline Bibliography Acknowledgements Also by Alan Rusbridger Notes Index Introduction By early 2017 the world had woken up to a problem that, with a mixture of impotence, incomprehension and dread, journalists had seen coming for some time. News – the thing that helped people understand their world; that oiled the wheels of society; that pollinated communities; that kept the powerful honest – news was broken. The problem had many different names and diagnoses. Some thought we were drowning in too much news; others feared we were in danger of becoming newsless.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changes We Face
    Introduction The changes we face We encourage our writers to use the word strongly supported across the business as a whole. “unprecedented” sparingly because it can so easily However, as this change represents the most signifi- be devalued. But we feel it is an appropriate cant editorial development of the past 30 years, the description of the past year in the life of Guardian Guardian editor’s strong preference for the mid-size Newspapers Limited (GNL) and the media industry was a critical element in the final decision. in general. Alongside the format change there will also be a We were faced with two major events: the close examination of the paper’s journalism, with the decision by two of our competitors to change to a purpose of reinforcing and expressing more clearly tabloid format; and the repercussions of the Hutton and reliably the mission of the Scott Trust to publish report, which investigated a BBC journalist’s claim quality newspapers, free from party affiliation, that the government had sexed up its dossier on Iraq remaining faithful to liberal tradition. before the war. This examination has been spurred on by contro- In our response to both situations, the core values versy on both sides of the Atlantic. The Hutton that were embedded in our organisation many report and the Mirror’s use of fake pictures of British decades ago have shown themselves to be troops abusing Iraqi prisoners has caused soul enduring and crucial, not only to our editorial searching about journalistic standards in this credibility, but also to our commercial success.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy and Media Intrusion
    House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Privacy and media intrusion Fifth Report of Session 2002–03 Volume I HC 458-I House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Privacy and media intrusion Fifth Report of Session 2002-03 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 May 2003 HC 458-I Published on 16 June 2003 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Gerald Kaufman MP (Labour, Manchester Gorton) (Chairman) Mr Chris Bryant MP (Labour, Rhondda) Mr Frank Doran MP (Labour, Aberdeen) Michael Fabricant MP (Conservative, Lichfield) Mr Adrian Flook MP (Conservative, Taunton) Alan Keen MP (Labour, Feltham and Heston) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) Ms Debra Shipley (Labour, Stourbridge) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Derek Wyatt MP (Labour, Sittingbourne and Sheppey) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/culture__media_and_sport.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Alternative Journalism, 2003-2016 by Tony Harcup
    Extending our gaze beyond the mainstream: studies of alternative journalism, 2003-2016 By Tony Harcup A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Publication Department of Journalism Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Sheffield Submitted: October 2016 [Tony Harcup PhD by Publication: Extending our gaze beyond the mainstream] Extending our gaze beyond the mainstream: studies of alternative journalism, 2003-2016 SUMMARY The thesis comprises a series of nine studies that were all published in peer- reviewed journals or books between 2003 and 2016, accompanied and contextualised by a commentary setting out the coherence and significance of the research when viewed as a whole. This work is concerned with exploration of alternative media in general, and alternative journalism in particular. The submitted publications comprise separate studies that are linked thematically and point to the following conclusions: alternative journalism is not necessarily a failed project just because audiences tend to be small and the lifetime of any particular project tends to be short; there can be said to be a continuum of journalistic practice involving both mainstream and alternative media; and the reporting practices and ethical commitment found within alternative journalism can be seen as an expression of active citizenship. Taken together, the studies gathered in the submission make an original contribution to scholarship in the fields of alternative media and alternative journalism; in the process, they have much to say about journalism as a whole. As an original contribution to scholarship over a sustained period of enquiry, the thesis represents a substantial addition to our knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changes We Face
    Introduction The changes we face We encourage our writers to use the word strongly supported across the business as a whole. “unprecedented” sparingly because it can so easily However, as this change represents the most signifi- be devalued. But we feel it is an appropriate cant editorial development of the past 30 years, the description of the past year in the life of Guardian Guardian editor’s strong preference for the mid-size Newspapers Limited (GNL) and the media industry was a critical element in the final decision. in general. Alongside the format change there will also be a We were faced with two major events: the close examination of the paper’s journalism, with the decision by two of our competitors to change to a purpose of reinforcing and expressing more clearly tabloid format; and the repercussions of the Hutton and reliably the mission of the Scott Trust to publish report, which investigated a BBC journalist’s claim quality newspapers, free from party affiliation, that the government had sexed up its dossier on Iraq remaining faithful to liberal tradition. before the war. This examination has been spurred on by contro- In our response to both situations, the core values versy on both sides of the Atlantic. The Hutton that were embedded in our organisation many report and the Mirror’s use of fake pictures of British decades ago have shown themselves to be troops abusing Iraqi prisoners has caused soul enduring and crucial, not only to our editorial searching about journalistic standards in this credibility, but also to our commercial success.
    [Show full text]
  • Guardians of Power the Myth of the Liberal Media
    Guardians of Power The Myth of the Liberal Media David Edwards and David Cromwell Pluto P Press LONDON • ANN ARBOR, MI Edwards 00 pre iii 27/10/05 16:09:34 First published 2006 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA and 839 Greene Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 www.plutobooks.com Copyright © David Edwards and David Cromwell 2006 Foreword copyright © John Pilger 2006 The right of David Edwards and David Cromwell to be identifi ed as the authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. John Pilger hereby asserts his moral right as author of the Foreword British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 7453 2483 5 hardback ISBN 0 7453 2482 7 paperback Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data applied for 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Designed and produced for Pluto Press by Chase Publishing Services Ltd, Fortescue, Sidmouth, EX10 9QG, England Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England Printed and bound in the European Union by Antony Rowe Ltd, Chippenham and Eastbourne, England Edwards 00 pre iv 27/10/05 16:09:35 Contents Acknowledgments viii Foreword by John Pilger ix 1 The Mass Media – Neutral, Honest, Psychopathic 1 Pulling The Other One – The Corporate ‘Free Press’ 1 Outlawing Social Responsibility 2 Of Big Brother and ‘Auntie Beeb’ – The Propaganda Model 4 The Convenient Rise of Professional Journalism 9 A Note About the Structure of this Book 12 2 Iraq – The Sanctions of
    [Show full text]
  • The Hazlitt Review
    THE HAZLITT REVIEW The Hazlitt Review is an annual peer-reviewed journal, the first internationally to be devoted to Hazlitt studies. The Review aims to promote and maintain Hazlitt’s standing, both in the academy and to a wider readership, by providing a forum for new writing on Hazlitt by established scholars as well as more recent entrants in the field. Editor Uttara Natarajan Assistant Editors Helen Hodgson, Michael McNay Editorial Board Geoffrey Bindman James Mulvihill David Bromwich Tom Paulin Jon Cook Seamus Perry Gregory Dart Michael Simpson Philip Davis Fiona Stafford A.C. Grayling Graeme Stones Paul Hamilton John Whale Ian Mayes Duncan Wu Tim Milnes Scholarly essays (4000–7000 words) and reviews should follow the MHRA style. The Board is also happy to consider more informal submissions from Hazlitt’s lay readership. Email [email protected] or post to Uttara Natarajan, c/o Department of English & Comparative Literature, Goldsmiths College, New Cross, London SE14 6NW. We regret that we cannot publish material already published or submitted elsewhere. Subscriptions, including membership of the Hazlitt Society: £10 (individual); £15 (corporate). Overseas subscriptions: $24 (individual) or $35 (corporate). Cheques/postal orders, made payable to the Hazlitt Society, to be sent to Helen Hodgson, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9AG). Enquiries to [email protected] or by post to Helen Hodgson. www.williamhazlitt.org ISSN 1757-8299 Published 2009 by The Hazlitt Society c/o Dept of English & Comparative
    [Show full text]
  • Hazlitt Society: £10 (Individual); £15 (Corporate)
    THE HAZLITT REVIEW The Hazlitt Review is an annual peer-reviewed journal, the first internationally to be devoted to Hazlitt studies. The Review aims to promote and maintain Hazlitt’s standing, both in the academy and to a wider readership, by providing a forum for new writing on Hazlitt, by established scholars as well as more recent entrants in the field. Editor Uttara Natarajan Assistant Editors Helen Hodgson, Michael McNay Editorial Board Geoffrey Bindman James Mulvihill David Bromwich Tom Paulin Jon Cook Seamus Perry Gregory Dart Michael Simpson Philip Davis Fiona Stafford A.C. Grayling Graeme Stones Paul Hamilton John Whale Ian Mayes Duncan Wu Tim Milnes Scholarly essays (4000–7000 words) and reviews should follow the MHRA style. The Board is also happy to consider more informal submissions from Hazlitt’s lay readership. Email [email protected] or post to Uttara Natarajan, c/o Department of English & Comparative Literature, Goldsmiths College, New Cross, London SE14 6NW. We regret that we cannot publish material already published or submitted elsewhere. Subscriptions, including membership of the Hazlitt Society: £10 (individual); £15 (corporate). Overseas subscriptions: $24 (individual) or $35 (corporate). Cheques/postal orders, made payable to the Hazlitt Society, to be sent to Helen Hodgson, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU Enquiries to [email protected] or by post to Helen Hodgson. www.williamhazlitt.org ISSN 1757-8299 Published 2011 by The Hazlitt Society c/o Dept of English & Comparative
    [Show full text]