DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced Energy Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advanced Energy Presentation Electric Transportation 101 Land of Sky Overview Meeting August 16, 2010 Agenda • History of Electric Transportation • Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) – Definitions > Models > Benefits • Neighborhood Electric Vehicles > Models – Features • Infrastructure – Charging Levels – Charging Station Components – Charging Station Models – Charging Locations Electric Vehicle History 1834: First electric car 1908: Henry Ford introduces Model T 1904 Baker EV 1920’s: Electric cars are no longer a viable consumer product 1968-1978: Congress passes safety and emissions regulatory statues 1996 - 1999: GM EV-1 2010-12: Launch of Plug-in Electric Vehicles Electric Drive Vehicles Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) Hybrid (HEV) PHEV All Electric Parallel Series (EREV) Primary Fuel Gasoline Electricity Electricity Electricity Secondary Fuel N/A Gasoline Gasoline N/A Wheels Driven by Gas Engine with Gas Engine and Electric Motor Electric Motor electric motor electric motor assist Range (miles) Electric: Minimal Electric: ~40 Electric: ~40 Electric: ~100+ Gas: 300+ Gas: 300+ Gas: 300+ Parallel PHEV Series (EREV) Generator Electric Motor Transmission Battery Pack Engine Many makes and models PHEV or EREV ALL ELECTRIC ? ? Nissan Leaf Mitsubishi iMIEV GM PHEV Chevrolet Volt Toyota Prius Smart ED ? Production Cadillac Converj BYD 3DFM Fisker Karma Ford Focus Ford Transit Tesla Connect VW Golf Ford Escape PHEV BMW Concept Chrysler/Fiat EV TwinDrive Mini-E Subaru R1e Demo/Concept Hyundai Blue-Will Volvo C30 Kia Ray Mercedes BlueCell Tesla Model S Toyota FT-EV For additional vehicle information visit: http://www.pluginamerica.org/plug-in-vehicle-tracker.html Benefits of PEVs Lower Cost Fewer Emissions Domestic Fuel Better Performance Neighborhood Electric Vehicles Low-Speed: maximum speed of 25 mph Short Range: typical range below 50 miles All-electric : NEVs do not use gasoline Charging: 120V or 240V Charging Stations Charging Station Levels • 120 VAC, 16 A 1 • 8 to 10 hour daily charge* • 208/240 VAC, 80 A maximum • Most common: 208/240 VAC, 30A (6.6 KW) 2 • 2 to 4 hour daily charge* • Over 240 VAC • 480 VDC - Fast Charge • Currently no SAE • TEPCO-based? 3 activity on Level 3 DC • 80% in under 30 min* * Estimated charge times are based on a vehicle utilizing 40 miles of electric only driving between charges. Charging Components Level 1 •Separate Cord Set •Standardized Connector at Vehicle End •Standard three-prong plug connects with grounded receptacle Level 2 •Cord set is part of charging station •Standardized Connector at Vehicle End •Hard-wired connection at charging station •GFI included •Multiple Communication Options Variety of Options Electric Transportation 101 [email protected] Advanced Energy Cyrus Dastur 909 Capability Drive, Suite 2100 Raleigh, NC 27606 [email protected] 919-857-9000 919-857-9000 ext. 9005 AdvancedEnergy.org Copyright © 2010 North Carolina Advanced Energy Corporation. All rights reserved. No part of this presentation may be reproduced, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by use of any information storage and retrieval system, without the written consent of North Carolina Advanced Energy Corporation. Community Planning for Plug-In Electric Vehicles Land of Sky Overview Meeting August 16, 2010 Presentation Overview How do we define “community” with respect to PEV planning? Why should we plan for PEVs at that community level? What is our current planning model? The PEV Planning Community Municipal Governments Businesses . PEV Ownership . PEV Ownership . Regulation . Electric Utilities . Infrastructure . Fleet Operators . Education . PEV Industry Citizens . PEV Ownership . Formal & Informal Networks Why Plan at the Community Level? Positive owner experience fosters adoption . Incentives beyond the vehicle benefits . Level-2 charging as a de facto baseline (convenience) . Charging options (range) . Regional consistency (scale up) Electric utility involvement . Need to serve customers . Long range planning A Model for Community Planning Origins with Rocky Mountain Institute’s PGR .High-level Goals .National Forum .Kickoff Partnership Local Development of Detailed Model Starting a Community Plan Getting Ready: Governments and Businesses .Stakeholders .Resources .Official Approval .Workgroups .Implementation Starting a Community Plan Getting Ready: Specific Steps .Overview meeting for stakeholders .Prepare for permitting & inspection .Set municipal goals and workgroups .Technical forum (inspectors, installers) .Chamber of Commerce meeting? .Community forum? Homebuilders forum? Starting a Community Plan Getting Ready: Governments and Businesses .Stakeholders Stakeholders . Sustainability .Resources . Fleet/Transportation/Parking .Official Approval . Facilities/Engineering . Purchasing .Work Structure . Executive Management .Implementation . Public Relations/HR . Planning/Land Use . Permitting/Inspections Starting a Community Plan Getting Ready: Governments and Businesses .Stakeholders Work Structure . Steering Committee .Resources . Standards .Official Approval . Siting and Installation . Vehicles .Work Structure . Incentives .Implementation . Education & Outreach Working Group Lessons Flexibility is mandatory! Variations in resources, strengths, interests, demo- graphics, etc. require variations in working groups: .Size & Composition .Goals .Timing/Staging .Regional Coordination Working Group Lessons Document current policies and procedures Take a holistic, long-term approach Remain technology-neutral Focus on good communication Implementing a Community Plan Steering Committee Sites & Education & Standards Incentives Installation Vehicles Outreach Standards Working Group Create appropriate policies and procedures Permitting, installation and inspections Consultation with electric utility and trades Equipment policies: technology-neutral Zoning requirements and compliance .Infrastructure requirements and ratios .Public/private parking, lots/decks, residential Siting & Installation Working Group Define criteria & plans for charging stations .Functionality .Cost Efficiency .Accessibility .Visibility .Safety Siting & Installation Working Group Least Amount of Charging Positive Message Public Fleet Vehicles Employee Vehicles Customer Vehicles Business Most Common Charging Location & Greatest Amount of Charging Greatest Need for Residential Infrastructure (Long Term) Siting & Installation Working Group SitingCriteria - Municipal Siting - Business ..ParkingFunctionality Lots/Decks . Offices ..SchoolsCost Efficiency . Shopping Centers ..LibrariesAccessibility . Colleges/Universities ..ServiceVisibility Yards . Hospitals ..OfficesSafety . Entertainment Venues . Fire & Police Stations Siting – Residential . Cultural Venues . Garage/Driveway . Parks . Multi-family/Street Siting & Installation Working Group Utility coordination for equipment sizing Connections to transit Maintenance, cost recovery, enforcement Plug-In Ready versus Plug-In Wired .Savings opportunities during construction .Parking, new homes Siting and Installation Working Group Siting & Installation Working Group Vehicles Working Group Selection, purchase, operation and maintenance Will vehicles be purchased? No: Blend with Education & Outreach? Yes: Fleet/transportation manager, purchasing manager, department heads, sustainability manager Understand application and life-cycle cost Interface with vendors and dealers Incentives Working Group Identify & implement incentives for ownership or operation Federal rebates . Vehicles: up to $7,500 for PEVs, up to $2,000 for NEVs . Stations: 50% up to $2,000 residential, up to $50,000 commercial State Options . Vehicle rebates: none in NC currently; up to $5,000 in CA and WA . Reductions in sales taxes and/or registration fees Local options . Reduced permit fees for charging stations . Free/preferential parking . Free public charging Incentives Working Group Employers . Free employee/customer charging . Vehicle purchase stipends for employees Department of Transportation . Reductions in state/local toll road charges . Access to HOV lanes Lenders . Preferential financing on vehicle loans Education & Outreach Working Group Disseminating knowledge from the other workgroups Vehicle features & benefits, justification for purchase Appropriate uses Charging station details Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Incentives Training: first responders, installers, mechanics, etc. Implementing a Community Plan Steering Committee Sites & Education & Standards Incentives Installation Vehicles Outreach Getting Ready - Resources Web-based tools Web Sites . General information . electricdrive.org . Resource sharing . evworld.com . pluginamerica.org . Conversation forums . projectgetready.org Guidebook development . Charging Station Technology Review . Community Planning Guidebook . Charging Station Installation Guidebook (code) Getting Ready - Resources EVSE Installation Process Customer Interested in Purchasing EVSE Single-Family Home H Customer just Charging station process Outlet uses a cord Level 1 or Installation set and Lvl 1 Level 2? Phase 1: 3-5 Days Needed? standard H H outlet H Lvl 2 (single-family residences) Contractor is Contacted Yes (Customer, Utility, Dealership, Other) Contractor Assesses and Prepares Preliminary Understand steps Estimate and Layout C No Is a service Home Owner Sets Up Yes upgrade needed? Meeting with Utility Planner . Responsibility H C No This will lead the Contractor Prepares Utility
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area the Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013
    E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area The Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013 The prepara on of this document was funded by a grant awarded by the Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MUAPCD), as part of the AB2766 program. Project Staff Alan Romero, Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MBUAPCD) AMBAG Dawn Mathes, Monterey County Resource Management Agency (RMA) Paul Hierling, Planner Carl P. Holm, Monterey County RMA Cody Meyer, Planner Craig Spencer, Monterey County RMA Anais Schenk, Planner Mario Salazar, Monterey County RMA Jason Adelaars, GIS Michael Ricker, City of Salinas Ecology Ac on Veronica Lezama, San Benito Council of Piet Canin, Vice President, Transporta on Governments Group Tegan Speiser, Santa Cruz County RTC Emily Glanville, Program Specialist Michael Zeller, TAMC Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air James Wasserman, Zero Motorcycles, Plug- Pollu on Control District In America Alan Romero, Air Quality Planner III Megan Tolbert, CSU Monterey Bay EV Communi es Alliance Piet Canin, Ecology Ac on Richard Corcoran, PEV Owner Richard Schorske, CEO Teresa Buika, UC Santa Cruz Previous staff contributors Richard Schorske, EV Communi es Alliance John Doughty Randy Deshazo, Principal Planner Linda Meckel, Planner, Project Manager MBEVA Plug-In Electric Vehicle Coordina ng Council Sharon Sarris, Green Fuse Energy Kris Markey, Offi ce of Monterey County Supervisor Parker Andy Hartmann, Interna onal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Cheryl Schmi , City of Santa Cruz For more informa on regarding this study, contact Anais Schenk at [email protected] 2 E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area Execu ve Summary..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • [En]=> (LV-CAN200)
    [en]=> (LV-CAN200) year program № from Rear right door Total CNG use CNG level (in kilograms) Ignition Engine is working on CNG Front left door Front right door Rear left door Trunk cover Engine cover (Hood) Charging cable connected Charging the battery Electric engine working Oil pressure / level Washer fluid level indicator turned Low AdBlue level Total mileage of the vehicle (dashboard) Vehicle mileage - (counted) Total fuel consumption Total fuel consumption - (counted) Fuel level (in percent) Fuel level (in liters) Engine speed (RPM) Engine temperature Vehicle speed Acceleration pedal position Total CNG consumption - (counted) CNG level (in percent) 1 ABARTH 124 SPIDER 2016 → 12259 2020-06-30 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 ABARTH 595 2016 → 12687 2019-05-30 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 ABARTH 695 2017 → 12687 2019-05-30 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 ACURA RDX 2010 → 11113 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 5 ACURA RDX 2007 → 11113 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 6 ACURA TL 2004 → 11167 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + 7 ACURA TLX 2015 → 12363 2019-05-19 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 8 ACURA TSX 2009 → 12578 2019-01-16 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 9 ACURA TSX 2004 → 11167 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + 10 ALFA ROMEO 159 2005 → 11128 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 11 ALFA ROMEO BRERA 2008 → 11128 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 12 ALFA ROMEO GIULIA 2017 → 12242 2019-05-22 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 13 ALFA ROMEO GIULIETTA 2013 → 11127 2019-04-10 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 14 ALFA ROMEO
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid and Electric Vehicles the ELECTRIC DRIVE PLUGS IN
    Hybrid and Electric Vehicles THE ELECTRIC DRIVE PLUGS IN June 2011 www.ieahev.org International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement for co-operation on Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Technologies and Programmes Hybrid and Electric Vehicles The Electric Drive Plugs In June 2011 The IA-HEV, also known as the Implementing Agreement for co-operation on Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Technologies and Programmes, functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IA-HEV do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of all its individual member countries. Cover Photo: 2011 Nissan Leaf SL 4dr Hatchback The electric drive plugs in. Cover designer: Kizita Awuakye, New West Technologies, LLC ii www.ieahev.org International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement for co-operation on Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Technologies and Programmes Annual report of the Executive Committee and Task 1 over the year 2010 Hybrid and Electric Vehicles The Electric Drive Plugs In Concept and editing: Kristin Abkemeier (Operating Agent Task 1, New West Technologies, LLC) Co-editing: Alison Mize (New West Technologies, LLC), Richard Todaro (New West Technologies), and Martijn van Walwijk (IA-HEV secretary-general) Design and layout: Kizita Awuakye (New West Technologies, LLC) Contributing authors: Kristin Abkemeier New West Technologies, LLC USA Dick Appels Agentschap NL The Netherlands James Barnes DOE USA David Beeton Urban Foresight United Kingdom Carol Burelle NRCan Canada Mario Conte ENEA Italy Isobel Davidson NRC Canada Jørgen Horstmann Consultant Denmark Christina Ianniciello BC Ministry of Energy and Mines Canada Ulf Jonson Swedish Energy Agency Sweden Sigrid Kleindienst Solarcenter Muntwyler AG Switzerland B.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Resetting Responsibilities Rethinking the Meaning of Responsibility
    Kia Motors Sustainability Magazine 2012 Special Feature Resetting Responsibilities Rethinking the meaning of responsibility Review: Challenges & Opportunities Discovering new opportunities and responsibilities amidst global challenges Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Renovating for Energy Minimizing use, maximizing reuse Efficiency Technological advances for enhanced efficiency Reshaping the Future Reinventing Ourselves Automotive evolution toward zero Casting new light on possibilities and emissions competencies Contents Sustainability Overview 02 Kia around the World Contact Us 04 CEO Message 18 Special Feature Review: Challenges & Opportunities Special Feature Supervisory Board of the Sustainability Economy Society 06 06 Resetting Responsibilities Gui-Hyun Choi Min-Su Park Suk-Jin Choi In 2012 MOVE, Kia Motors’Director, Management2011 activities Strategy Group and Manager, Management Strategy Team Assistant Manager, Human Resources Administration Team Goan-Soo Shin Dae-Jung Kim Dong-Woo Shin achievements are organizedGeneral Manager, by key CSR global Environmental chal Management- Team Deputy General Manager, Management Strategy Team Assistant Manager, Procurement Planning & Strategy Team lenges and issues. ‘Review:Chang-Muk Challenges Choi & Op- Seok-Kee Baik Hyun-Seok Chae General Manager, CSR Environmental Management Team General Manager, Global Planning Team Deputy General Manager, HRD Planning Team 14 Coordination & Regulation portunities’ outlines ourKeuk-Jin commitment Bang to corpo- Jong-Lyoul Jang Nam-Kyu Kim rate citizenship and ourDeputy
    [Show full text]
  • [En]=> (LV-CAN200)
    [en]=> (LV-CAN200) year program № from Engine is working on CNG Front left door Front right door Rear right door Trunk cover Oil pressure / level Total mileage of the vehicle (dashboard) Total fuel consumption Fuel level (in percent) Fuel level (in liters) Engine temperature Vehicle speed Acceleration pedal position Total CNG consumption - (counted) CNG level (in percent) CNG level (in kilograms) Rear left door Engine cover (Hood) Vehicle mileage - (counted) Total fuel consumption - (counted) Engine speed (RPM) Total CNG use 1 ABARTH 124 SPIDER 2016 → 12259 2020-06-30 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 ABARTH 595 2016 → 12687 2019-05-30 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 ABARTH 695 2017 → 12687 2019-05-30 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 ACURA RDX 2010 → 11113 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 5 ACURA RDX 2007 → 11113 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 6 ACURA TL 2004 → 11167 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + 7 ACURA TLX 2015 → 12363 2019-05-19 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 8 ACURA TSX 2009 → 12578 2019-01-16 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 9 ACURA TSX 2004 → 11167 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + 10 ALFA ROMEO 159 2005 → 11128 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 11 ALFA ROMEO BRERA 2008 → 11128 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 12 ALFA ROMEO GIULIA 2017 → 12242 2019-05-22 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 13 ALFA ROMEO GIULIETTA 2013 → 11127 2019-04-10 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 14 ALFA ROMEO GIULIETTA 2010 → 11127 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 15 ALFA ROMEO GT 2005 → 11128 2017-09-01 + + + + + + + + + + + 16 ALFA ROMEO MITO 2014 → 11127 2017-09-01
    [Show full text]
  • Resetting Responsibilities Rethinking the Meaning of Responsibility
    Kia Motors Sustainability Magazine 2012 Special Feature Resetting Responsibilities Rethinking the meaning of responsibility Review: Challenges & Opportunities Discovering new opportunities and responsibilities amidst global challenges Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Renovating for Energy Minimizing use, maximizing reuse Efficiency Technological advances for enhanced efficiency Reshaping the Future Reinventing Ourselves Automotive evolution toward zero Casting new light on possibilities and emissions competencies Contents Sustainability Overview 02 Kia around the World Contact Us 04 CEO Message 18 Special Feature Review: Challenges & Opportunities Special Feature Supervisory Board of the Sustainability Economy Society 06 06 Resetting Responsibilities Gui-Hyun Choi Min-Su Park Suk-Jin Choi In 2012 MOVE, Kia Motors’Director, Management2011 activities Strategy Group and Manager, Management Strategy Team Assistant Manager, Human Resources Administration Team Goan-Soo Shin Dae-Jung Kim Dong-Woo Shin achievements are organizedGeneral Manager, by key CSR global Environmental chal Management- Team Deputy General Manager, Management Strategy Team Assistant Manager, Procurement Planning & Strategy Team lenges and issues. ‘Review:Chang-Muk Challenges Choi & Op- Seok-Kee Baik Hyun-Seok Chae General Manager, CSR Environmental Management Team General Manager, Global Planning Team Deputy General Manager, HRD Planning Team 14 Coordination & Regulation portunities’ outlines ourKeuk-Jin commitment Bang to corpo- Jong-Lyoul Jang Nam-Kyu Kim rate citizenship and ourDeputy
    [Show full text]
  • E-Mobility Index Q3 2015
    STUDY E-Mobility Index Q3 2015 Roland Berger – Automotive Competence Center & Forschungsgesellschaft Kraftfahrwesen mbH Aachen September 2015 E-MOBILITY INDEX Q3 2015 1 Key takeaways from the E-Mobility Index for Q3 2015 > While the competitive situation in respect of industry remains largely unchanged, France has taken the lead in terms of technology. With regard to the market, Japan has dropped from second to fourth place, and growth in the USA has also slowed significantly. France has increased its lead still further, while Germany has moved into third place on the back of strong growth. However, the average market share of xEVs in the seven leading automotive nations is stagnating at below 1%. > The lack of coherent sales concepts is partly responsible for the weak sales figures. OEMs are not doing enough to win customers over to BEVs and PHEVs. Strategies are lacking for creating lasting incentives for dealers to sell low-emission vehicles. > xEVs are still underperforming on key customer criteria, especially range. Besides developing a new generation of cells with higher energy density, considerable savings are possible by reducing the energy consumption of auxiliary electric devices, especially in the area of climate control. 2 Summary comparison of the competitive positions of the world's seven leading automotive nations In terms of technology, France has overtaken Japan and is now in pole position. Behind this improvement lies a shift in the model mix of French OEMs in favor of smaller BEVs that offer good value for money. Japan is losing out by comparison because its OEM product portfolios exhibit only marginal technical development in the medium term.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT ZHOU, XIAOHU. Design and Control of Bi-Directional Grid
    ABSTRACT ZHOU, XIAOHU. Design and Control of Bi-Directional Grid-Interactive Converter for Plug- in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Applications. (Under the direction of Dr. Alex Q. Huang). The plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) is a promising technology which provides a sustainable approach to transportation that is easily accessible to a large portion of the population that already relies on gasoline-fueled cars. Although the larger scale adoption of plug-in hybrid vehicles is still years away, politicians, electric utilities, and auto companies are eagerly awaiting the opportunities that will arise from reduced emissions, reduced gasoline consumption, new electric utility services, increased revenues, and new markets that will lead to the creation of new jobs. In addition, the electrification of the transportation system would lead to the creation of new avenues for researchers. In the case of power electronics researchers, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles would provide a new candidate for energy storage. Because energy storage is a component of so called “smart grids,” a topic of growing interest to the power engineering research community, PHEVs could be incorporated as a vital part of such a system. However, to enable this functionality, a power electronics interface between the vehicle and grid is required. The motivation of this dissertation is to design a grid-interactive smart charger to enable PHEV as distributed energy storage device which will play an important role in smart grid applications. For grid-connection applications of the proposed converter, adaptive virtual resistor control is proposed to achieve high power quality for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles integration with various grid conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Program in Korea
    Electric Vehicle Program in Korea Dr. Chung Youl, Lee 1. Introduction Why supply of electric vehicle is needed? Rise of oil Price, Limited resource : Oil by 40 & Gas by 58 years (World Resource Institute) Greenhouse gases emissions : Transport accounted for 17 % (78.2 % as Road transport) (Greenhouse Gas Information Center) Carcinogenicity of diesel emission : change in dangerous Index (2A → 1st, 06. 2012) ( WHO IARC) *1st : Sufficient material that can lead to cancer 1 1. Introduction However, is it dissatisfied with supply of eco friendly cars? • Because of eco friendly cars, is it OK even expensive? * Size like as small car, but price as much expensive as mid or full size car. When Eco-friendly c ars will be supplied more cheaper? • Because of eco friendly cars, is it OK even uncomfortable? * When we do not worried about concerning such as anxiety about technology, lack of infrast ructure and recharging? • When the timely development of eco friendly cars? Now or after preparing for development and economics? * Do you think that environment will be improved though few eco-friendly cars are supplied? So, It is important that the leading role and support of government for supply of eco friendly cars 2 2. Status of Korea’s Vehicle Market Under continuous growth, but it still requires support! • Continuous growth in domestic automobile • The major eco-friendly vehicle is Hybrid market * account for 3 % in total sales of vehicle (2012) * 12 (1970) ⇒ 53 (1980) ⇒ 339 (1990) ⇒ 1,205 • Launch electric vehicle and fuel cell vehicle recently (2000) ⇒ 1,887 (2012) (Unit : 10 thousand) ~2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Hybrid CNG EV 1970 1980 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2012 (단위 :［ 대Registration) status of eco-friendly vehicle］ ［Sales status of eco-friendly vehicle］ 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Quattro Freni Qf40d00006
    QUATTRO FRENI QF40D00006 ПОДШИПНИК ПЕРЕДНЕЙ СТУПИЦЫ КОМПЛЕКТ CROSS-REFERENCE: 5172002000, 517201C000, 5172025000, 5172029100, 5172029150, 5172029400, 5172029300 Характеристики: Применяемость HYUNDAI ACCENT I (X-3) 1.5 i 16V 12.1995 - 01.2000 HYUNDAI ACCENT I (X-3) 1.5 i 12V 10.1994 - 01.2000 HYUNDAI ACCENT I (X-3) 1.5 16V 10.1994 - 01.2000 HYUNDAI ACCENT I (X-3) 1.3 i 12V 10.1994 - 01.2000 HYUNDAI ACCENT I (X-3) 1.3 10.1994 - 01.2000 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.6 12.2002 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.6 01.2000 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.5 CRDi 04.2002 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.5 09.1999 - 10.2002 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.5 09.2000 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.5 01.2000 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.5 01.2000 - 10.2002 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.3 08.2002 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II (LC) 1.3 01.2000 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.6 12.2002 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.5 LPG 01.2000 - 12.2006 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.5 CRDi 01.2002 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.5 01.2000 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.5 09.1999 - 10.2002 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.5 01.2000 - 12.2006 HYUNDAI ACCENT II седан (LC) 1.3 01.2000 - 11.2005 HYUNDAI ACCENT III (MC) 1.6 GLS 11.2005 - 11.2010 HYUNDAI ACCENT III (MC) 1.5 CRDi GLS 11.2005 - 11.2010 HYUNDAI ACCENT III (MC) 1.4 GL 11.2005 - 11.2010 HYUNDAI ACCENT III седан (MC) 1.6 GLS 11.2005 - 11.2010 HYUNDAI ACCENT III седан (MC) 1.5 CRDi GLS 11.2005 - 11.2010 HYUNDAI ACCENT III седан (MC) 1.4 GL 11.2005 - 11.2010 HYUNDAI ACCENT седан
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility 2025 and Beyond
    eMobility in Europe: Status and outlook 1. Fachtagung "e-mobil in niederösterreich" S. Pölten, March 4, 2015 Contents A. Drivers for Powertrain Electrification 3 B. Status eMobility (eMobility Index Q3/14) 9 C. Trends 2020..2025 19 This document shall be treated as confidential. It has been compiled for the exclusive, internal use by our client and is not complete without the underlying detail analyses and the oral presentation. It may not be passed on and/or may not be made available to third parties without prior written consent from Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. RBSC does not assume any responsibility for the completeness and accuracy of the statements made in this document. © Roland Berger Strategy Consultants Status-eMobility-2015-03-04.pptx 2 A. Drivers for powertrain electrification Status-eMobility-2015-03-04.pptx 3 A Drivers for Powertrain Electrification eMobility is driven by customer "Pull" and regulatory "Push" Importance of xEVs 2020 and 2025 high Driven by Customer pull Need for xEVs Regulatory push low ~2020 ~2025 Source: Roland Berger Status-eMobility-2015-03-04.pptx 4 5 A Drivers for Powertrain Electrification Europe will drive the global powertrain electrification – Long term cost competitiveness of xEVs generates additional market pull Regional powertrain trends (illustrative) 2015 2020 2025 Importance 75 g/km (73 94 g/km (58 PHEV platforms mpg) mpg) Flexible powertrain Next gen. Li-Ion Cost architectures 48V batteries competitive next xEV Importance 17 km/l (40 20 km/l (48 mpg) mpg) 2025 standards Cost innovation xEV not yet defined xEV city driving Cost competitive xEV Importance 41 mpg 54 mpg Cost competitive xEV Importance 13 th 5-Year-Plan High efficient ICE xEV Customer pull Technology innovation Milestones framework Page 5 Source: Roland Berger Status-eMobility-2015-03-04.pptx 5 A Drivers for Powertrain Electrification Regulatory requirements push improvements in most regions – In Europe, NA and Japan, there is also a strong customer pull Assessment CO2 emission/fuel consumption regulation and customer pull 2) 4) .
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid/Electric Drive Vehicles
    Hybrid/Electric Drive Vehicles Fairfax, Virginia March 23, 2011 This workshop made possible through support from the U.S. Department of Energy and partners. Materials for the Clean Transportation Education Project were developed by the NC Solar Center/NC State University and partners with funding from the U.S. Dept of Energy Clean Cities program. The U.S. Government does not assume any legal liability, responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information provided, nor endorse any particular product through this support. Topics to be covered today • Review of hybrid technology • Plug in and EV technology overview • Charging technology • Range anxiety • New models coming to market • Heavy duty hybrids Technology Transportation is becoming a mix of technologies taking us toward sustainability through fuel economy (efficiency), advanced power-trains and idle reduction 3 The Future of Transportation Hybrids & Electric Vehicles!! 4 What is a Hybrid Electric Vehicle? • A hybrid is a vehicle powered by two or more power- sources of differing technologies, drawing on the key benefits of each power-source to maximize efficiency - Typically an internal combustion engine (ICE) and one or more electric motors - The ICE can be powered by gasoline or diesel or alternative fuels - A fuel cell can be used in place of the ICE • Hybrids also carry two or more sources of energy- liquid fuel for the ICE and battery pack for electrical storage 5 2000 Honda Insight • First hybrid vehicle available to consumers in the United States • The InsightPhoto Courtesy Carquest carried an EPA rating of 70 MPG hwy. 61 city Courtesy of Honda Motor Sales, U.S.A 6 Hybrid Terminology-Components Full Hybrid = These have two Motor/Generators, Battery Pack, DC/DC Converter, Inverter, Converter & Control Electronics • Battery acts as a storage medium for electricity.
    [Show full text]