Vehicle for Success

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vehicle for Success RESEARCHJanuaryREPORT 6, 2020 JanuaryVehicle 6, 2020 for Success Stock Rating BUY Price Target $14.28 Current Price $12.11 Bear Price Bull Case Target Case $10.83 $14.28 $15.71 Ticker APR.UN Automotive Properties REIT Market Cap (MM) $456.5 Vehicle for Success P/FFO 2019E 13.0x Dividend Yield 6.6% As was mentioned earlier in the year, one aspect of the FIG team’s strategy is to acquire greater exposure to cash flow driven 52 Week Performance investments instead of those based solely on share price appreciation. This same vein of thought led the FIG team to examine Automotive Properties REIT (“APR REIT”, “APR”, “the REIT”). APR REIT 125 was first examined in 2017. However, QUIC never invested in the name. Due to its high yield and strong underlying market drivers, the 115 FIG team has decided to revisit APR and determine if it is now more attractive than it once was. 105 To guide the analyses, the FIG team revisited the three theses posed in the original pitch: 95 I. Thesis I: First Mover Advantage Within Fragmented Market 28-Feb-19 18-Jul-19 5-Dec-19 II. Thesis II: Strategic Partnership With Dilawri Group APR.UN S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index III. Thesis III: Low Risk, High Growth REIT With Attractive Yield Finally, the valuation was considered in three ways. First, a dividend discount model was employed and yielded an implied share price of Financial Institutions $15..14. Then, a standard NAV model was used to evaluate the underlying assets. This resulted in an implied share price of $10.83. Linna Li Finally, the price to book value was graphed over time so that the [email protected] valuation of the REIT relative to itself could be evaluated. Henry Yu [email protected] Karan Goyal [email protected] The information in this document is for EDUCATIONAL and NON-COMMERCIAL use only and is not intended to Max Bernardi constitute specific legal, accounting, financial or tax advice for any individual. In no event will QUIC, its members or directors, or Queen’s University be liable to you or anyone else for any loss or damages whatsoever (including [email protected] direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential, exemplary or punitive damages) resulting from the use of this document, or reliance on the information or content found within this document. The information may not be reproduced or republished in any part without the prior written consent of QUIC and Queen’s University. QUIC is not in the business of advising or holding themselves out as being in the business of advising. Many factors may affect the applicability of any statement or comment that appear in our documents to an individual's particular circumstances. ` © Queen’s University 2020 January 6, 2020 Vehicle for Success Table of Contents Automotive Dealership Industry Overview 3 Automotive Properties REIT Overview 5 Thesis I Revisited: First Mover Advantage Within Fragmented Market 6 Thesis II Revisited: Strategic Partnership with Dilawri Group 7 Thesis III Revisited: High Growth REIT with Attractive Yield 9 Valuation 10 Key Risk Explored 11 2 January 6, 2020 Vehicle for Success Automotive Dealership Industry Overview Over the past two decades, the Canadian automotive EXHIBIT III industry has seen significant growth as well as changes to the competitive landscape. In 2017, ~58% of all Average Age of Vehicles on Roads in Canada new-vehicle sales in Canada were controlled by large auto dealership groups, compared to only 9% in 2000. 15 12.0 These auto dealership groups own dozens of locations 8.7 9.2 and sell various brands of vehicles, representing 10 7.3 consolidation in the industry as more single-store 5 owners exit the business. The number of ownership 0 groups with at least five stores has increased at a 1990 2000 2010 2020E CAGR of 9.2% from 27 in 2000 to 121 in 2017. There are currently ~3,600 automotive dealerships Source(s): AIA Canada throughout Canada, typically located in close proximity to large urban centres and customer bases. According to the Canadian Auto Dealers Association (CADA), ~35.0% of all auto dealerships are located in EXHIBIT I or within close proximity to Canada’s six largest markets: Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Toronto, Publicly Disclosed Dealership Transactions in North Ottawa, and Montreal (VECTOM). Changes in America (C$MM) consumer preferences towards purchasing new cars have fueled dealership sales and location growth over $2,175 2,400 the past few years, but the market remains in the early 1,800 $1,329 stages of consolidation. Over the past few years, $963 $1,110 $1,050 1,200 $899 changes in demographics, technology, and consumer 600 $179 preference have influenced the performance of various 0 dealerships. Trends such as electric vehicle ownership, 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Q2 which is expected to reach 120 million vehicles 2019 globally by 2030, as well as the ability to purchase cars online or through alternative means has been creating Source(s): MNP Corporate Finance challenges and opportunities for auto dealerships. EXHIBIT II There are a number of structural barriers that limit entry into the Canadian auto dealership real estate market. Dealerships are typically operated under Retail Automotive Sales in Canada (C$B) franchise agreements with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). These manufacturers are 200 brands such as General Motors, with high exclusivity 150 rights creating barriers to becoming a licensed auto 100 dealer. OEMs prefer to give franchise contracts to existing operators, as there are extensive capital 50 requirements necessary to enter the auto space. This is 0 the main reason why the REIT structure is suitable for '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 this industry, as auto dealers can grow their dealership base while deploying less capital. Source(s): APR Investor Presentation 3 January 6, 2020 Vehicle for Success Automotive Properties REIT Overview As was the case back when the legacy Cash Yield team EXHIBIT IV pitched it back in 2017, Automotive Properties REIT (TSX:APR.UN) continues to be the only public vehicle Annualized Minimum Rent By City focused solely on consolidating automotive dealership real estate in Canada. The business model that APR employs involves buying the underlying real estate 13% from car dealerships where the owner requires liquidity either for succession planning, retirement, or 32% 9% expansion of the business. Because of the difficulty involved in finding a new tenant or moving a dealership to a new property, a symbiotic relationship is formed between the landlord and the tenant. This 10% results in APR holding one of Canada’s longest weighted-average lease terms of 13.5 years and leases that are structured as triple net leases, reducing costs for APR. As of Q3 of 2019, the REIT manages 2.3 11% 13% million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) 13% spread across 61 properties. Automotive Properties REIT has seen aggressive growth over the past five Toronto Ottawa Calgary years since its IPO, increasing its number of properties Vancouver Montreal Edmonton by 32. Other This expansion has led to not only greater geographic diversification, but also greater diversification of brand exposure. Source(s): RBC Equity Research EXHIBIT V Automotive Properties REIT Exposure by Brand Type 20% 17.4% 15% 13.2% 13.5% 11.1% 10.4% 9.2% 10% 6.1% 4.4% 5% 3.8% 3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 0% BMW Honda VW Toyota Audi Acura GM Nissan Porsche Mazda Chrylser Other Source(s): Investor Presentation 4 January 6, 2020 Vehicle for Success Automotive Properties REIT Overview It is also important to note that this growth has not continues to hold a significant 26.2% effective interest been dilutive to APR’s performance. Since inception, in the REIT. What has changed in this relationship is AFFO per unit on a diluted basis has remained steady that today, only 63% of APR’s properties consist of at ~$0.90. Dilawri dealerships and only 59% of APR’s cash NOI is now derived from the Dilawri group. This A defining feature of Automotive Properties REIT is its diversification is a strong signal, as the tenant close relationship with the Dilawri Group (“Dilawri”, concentration and potential conflicts of interest were “the Group”). The Dilawri Group is Canada’s largest key risks in QUIC’s original 2017 pitch. auto dealership developer, and its relationship with Automotive Properties REIT dates back to its IPO. In summary, APR continues to be a first-mover in the Because Dilawri required a strategic partner, APR REIT Canadian auto dealership space and operates was created. For that reason, at its IPO, 100% of APR favorable leases as it steadily becomes a more REIT’s properties were leased by Dilawri dealerships. diversified REIT. This relationship with Dilawri is ongoing, as Dilawri EXHIBIT VII EXHIBIT VI Growth in Number of Properties FFO, AFFO, and Payout Ratio 75 $40 100% 61 60 $32 90% 54 $24 80% 45 39 32 $16 70% 29 Value ($MM) Value 30 Payout Ratio (%) Ratio Payout $8 60% 15 $0 50% 2016 2017 2018 0 FFO (LHS) AFFO (LHS) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Q3 FFO (RHS) AFFO (RHS) Number of Properties Source(s): APR Investor Presentation Source(s): APR Filings 5 January 6, 2020 Vehicle for Success Thesis I Revisited: First Mover Advantage Within Fragmented Market When Automotive Properties REIT was first pitched, one dealership, 35% of companies own five or more it demonstrated an ability to consolidate the dealerships and 15% of companies own 2-4 fragmented auto dealership property industry. As dealerships. mentioned, APR is still the only REIT that is focused on consolidating properties in the auto industry.
Recommended publications
  • Miami-Dade Stretches to Accommodate American Dream Miami, North America's Largest Mall American Dream Miami Wouldn't
    Miami-Dade stretches to accommodate American Dream Miami, North America’s largest mall Brian Bandell, Senior Reporter, South Florida Business Journal American Dream Miami wouldn’t just be the largest mall in North America; it would be unlike almost any attraction in the world for its scope of activities and potential economic impact. That vision for this mega mall, slated to open in northwest Miami-Dade County in 2020, has inspired both anticipation and trepidation. It’s sure to create thousands of jobs, lure more tourists and generate major tax revenue - an estimated $48.5 million locally and $93.6 million for the state. But the project could exacerbate an already difficult traffic problem, and the majority of its jobs would pay less than $25,000 a year. Triple Five Group, the owner of the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota, plans to build the 6.2 million-square-foot retail and entertainment complex with 2,000 hotel rooms at the southwest corner of Florida’s Turnpike and Interstate 75. The $3.2 billion project is under county review for a comprehensive development plan amendment, along with the Graham Cos.’s proposal on a neighboring 309-acre site for 2,000 multifamily rental units, 1 million square feet of retail and a 3 million-square-foot business park. The first county commission vote in May is expected to trigger a state review. Coming together quickly Plans for American Dream Miami first came to light in March, and have been moving at a rapid pace with the strong backing of Miami-Dade Mayor Carlos Gimenez.
    [Show full text]
  • G:\Home\Journals\Tablerecords
    MOTIONS FOR RETURNS (2000) 1 MR NO. MOTION FOR RETURN (MR) ASKED FOR BY DATE ACCEPTED, RETURN TABLED BY, AMENDED, DATE TABLED, AND REJECTED, SESSIONAL PAPER NO. WITHDRAWN MR1 A copy of the October 19, 1993 document from a third party to the Executive Council/Office of Mr. Sapers Rejected Not applicable the Premier relating to the refinancing of the West Edmonton Mall. March 15, 2000 MR2 A copy of the December 3, 1993 letter from one MLA (Member of the Legislative Assembly) to Mr. Sapers Rejected Not applicable a second MLA, in the possession of the Executive Council/Office of the Premier relating to the March 15, 2000 refinancing of the West Edmonton Mall. MR3 A copy of the December 3, 1993 memo from one MLA (Member of the Legislative Assembly) Mr. Sapers Rejected Not applicable to another MLA, in the possession of the Executive Council/Office of the Premier relating to the March 15, 2000 refinancing of the West Edmonton Mall. MR4 A copy of the February 18, 1993 letter from a third party to the Executive Council/Office of the Mr. Sapers Rejected Not applicable Premier relating to the refinancing of the West Edmonton Mall. March 15, 2000 MR5 Copies of all studies and reports prepared by, or for, the Department of Resource Development Mr. White Accepted Hon. Dr. West between May 25, 1999 and February 17, 2000 providing the yearly projection of upside interest March 8, 2000 March 9, 2000 accruing to the Province from the operations of the Lloydminster Bi-provincial Upgrader for the SP 224/2000 period 2000-2014 as specified under the Upside Interest Agreement of February 7, 1995 between the Government and CIC (Crown Investment Corporation) Industrial Interests Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrative List of Past and Present Urbanics Clients
    ILLUSTRATIVE LIST OF PAST AND PRESENT URBANICS CLIENTS Urbanics has assisted businesses and governments create special places across a wide range of geographies, project types, and land uses. The following selection illustrates the breadth and depth of our experience. Developers and Investors Municipal and Regional Governments First Nations Consulting Firms Economic Development Organizations Federal Government Departments and Agencies Overseas Clients Provincial Government Departments and Agencies Retailers Other Clients Developers and Investors • Amacon Construction • Anthem Properties • Aquilini Development • Arlington Group • Armco Capital Inc. • Auguston Town Developments • Beaverbrook Communities • Bentall Kennedy • Best Western Hotels & Resorts • Bill’s Development Group • Blackwood Partners • British Pacific Properties • Cadillac Fairview • Cairn Homes • Cameron Development Corp. • Campeau Construction • Cancorp Property Group • Concord Pacific • Canderel Inc. • Century Group • C.N. Hotels • Creson Corporation • Crystal Properties • Daon Development • Emaar Properties (Canada) Ltd. • Equitable Real Estate Investment Corp. • Evervan Enterprises Group • First Capital REIT • Focus Equities • FSJ Aurora Development • Genstar Development • GWL Realty Advisors • Holborn Group • Hudson Pacific Properties • Ignition Holdings • Integrated Building and Design Corp. • Intrawest Properties • Keycorp Developments • Kingswood Capital Corporation • Kumagai Gumi Co. • Laing Properties • Lansdowne Equity Ventures • Larco Investments • Loblaw Properties
    [Show full text]
  • The American Dream
    The American Dream America's latest shopping & leisure experience in New Jersey Many years ago so-called "XXL shopping malls" the urban shopping experience in concentrated form spread as a major trend from America to Europe and the rest of the world. The West Edmonton Mall, which opened in Canada in 1981 and was considered the world's largest shopping centre until 2004, set standards for modern shopping facilities early on combined with a wealth of entertainment offerings. The Mall of America in Bloomington/Minnesota (USA, opened in 1992) can also boast superlatives: with more than 40 million visitors annually, it is the world's most visited shopping mall. All these projects have a connection to the Edmonton/Alberta-based project developer Triple Five Group, a company founded by the Ghermezian family in the mid-Sixties and still owned by them. The West Edmonton Mall and the Mall of America were developed and continue to be operated by the Canadian company. The most recent projects of the Triple Five conglomerate include the new American Dream shopping and entertainment centre in the US state of New Jersey, the first section of which was officially opened on 25 October 2019 (see EAP News of 25 October 2019). In 2011 the Triple Five Group took over the retail project in East Rutherford, originally planned under the name "Meadowlands Xanadu", which had been under construction since 2004. The complex is now to be completed in four phases and will subsequently contain hundreds of retail, catering, entertainment and fashion offerings on an area of approximately 279,000 square meters.
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting of the Azle City Council
    AZLE MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 613 S.E. PARKWAY AZLE, TEXAS 76020 TUESDAY February 11, 2014 AGENDA President Ray Ivey Jack Stevens Vice President Kevin Ingle Justin Berg Secretary Joe McCormick Council Member Paul Crabtree Council Member William Chambers REGULAR SESSION 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER PRESENTATION 1. Presentation of the MDD’s Quarterly Investment Report for Quarter ended December 31, 2013 Executive Director Craig Lemin ACTION ITEMS 2. Consider approving the Minutes of the January 14, 2014 Azle MDD regular meeting Secretary Joe McCormick 3. Discuss upcoming economic development conferences and consider any action on amending the FY2013-2014 budget to allocate funds for travel and training expenses President Ray Ivey DISCUSSION ITEMS 4. Discuss setting goals and priorities of the Strategic Plan for the Azle MDD President Ray Ivey 5. Discussion regarding Azle Municipal Development District plans/procedures/policies President Ray Ivey ADJOURNMENT I, the undersigned authority, do hereby certify the above Agenda was posted at City Hall on February 7, 2014 at the City’s official bulletin board and is readily accessible to the public at all times in accordance with V.T.C.A. Chapter 551, Texas Government Code. ______________________________ Susie Hiles, Assistant to the City Manager Date Agenda Removed from Posting This facility is wheelchair accessible and handicapped parking spaces are available. Auxiliary aids and services are available to a person when necessary to afford an equal opportunity to participate in city functions and activities. Auxiliary aids and services or accommodations should be requested forty-eight hours prior to the scheduled starting time by calling the City Secretary’s Office at 817-444-7101.
    [Show full text]
  • Registrar's Periodical, August 15, 2018
    Service Alberta ____________________ Corporate Registry ____________________ Registrar’s Periodical REGISTRAR’S PERIODICAL, AUGUST 15, 2018 SERVICE ALBERTA Corporate Registrations, Incorporations, and Continuations (Business Corporations Act, Cemetery Companies Act, Companies Act, Cooperatives Act, Credit Union Act, Loan and Trust Corporations Act, Religious Societies’ Land Act, Rural Utilities Act, Societies Act, Partnership Act) 0943590 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps 1137561 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 JUL 06 Registered Address: 2800 - 801 Registered 2018 JUL 04 Registered Address: 801-9624 6TH AVENUE SW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T2P4A3. 105 ST NW, EDMONTON ALBERTA, T5K0Z8. No: No: 2121295618. 2121291609. 101063792 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other 114 WEST CONSULTING LTD. Named Alberta Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 JUL 13 Registered Corporation Incorporated 2018 JUL 11 Registered Address: 19 TARALAKE MEWS NE, CALGARY Address: 19 CEDARBROOK PL SW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T3J 0H9. No: 2121311373. ALBERTA, T2W 4T4. No: 2021307091. 101297854 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other 1159035 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 JUL 06 Registered Registered 2018 JUL 06 Registered Address: 833 Address: 4852 50 AVE NE, #2, CALGARY ALBERTA, TERRACE OFFICE TOWER 4445 CALGARY TRAIL T3J 4L8. No: 2121297408. NW, EDMONTON ALBERTA, T6H5R7. No: 2121298638. 102054526 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 JUL 03 Registered 1167823 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Address: 18 COLONIALE WAY, BEAUMONT Registered 2018 JUL 03 Registered Address: 9 ROYAL ALBERTA, T4X 1L4. No: 2121286385. BIRCH HEIGHTS NW, CALGARY ALBERTA, T3G5R1. No: 2121288191. 102054641 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Registered 2018 JUL 03 Registered 1169810 B.C. LTD. Other Prov/Territory Corps Address: 5009 - 47 STREET PO BOX 20 STN MAIN Registered 2018 JUL 09 Registered Address: 510- 33 (27274-1 TRK), LLOYDMINSTER ARBOUR GROVE CLOSE NW, CALGARY SASKATCHEWAN, S9V 0X9.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocanada Q4 2018
    2018 Management Discussion & Analysis MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the year ended December 31, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Reader advisories 2 11. Outstanding shares 34 2. Executive summary 3 12. Dividends 35 3. Outlook 6 13. Free cash flow 35 4. Market 7 14. Critical accounting estimates and accounting 38 policy developments 5. Selected annual financial information 11 15. Disclosure controls and internal controls over 38 financial reporting 6. Selected quarterly financial information 13 16. Risk factors 39 7. Results of operations 15 17. Forward-looking statements 39 8. Same store results 24 18. Non-GAAP measures 39 9. Acquisitions, relocations and real estate 28 10. Liquidity and capital resources 31 1. READER ADVISORIES results of the Company for the three month period and This Management’s Discussion & Analysis (“MD&A”) year ended December 31, 2017. was prepared as of March 14, 2019, to assist readers in understanding AutoCanada Inc.’s (the “Company” or This MD&A contains forward-looking statements. “AutoCanada”) consolidated financial performance for Please see the section “FORWARD-LOOKING the year ended December 31, 2018, and significant STATEMENTS” for a discussion of the risks, trends that may affect AutoCanada’s future uncertainties and assumptions used to develop our performance. The following discussion and analysis forward-looking information. This MD&A also makes should be read in conjunction with the audited annual reference to certain non-GAAP measures to assist consolidated financial statements and accompanying users in assessing AutoCanada’s performance. Non- notes (the “Consolidated Financial Statements”) of GAAP measures do not have any standard meaning AutoCanada as at and for the year ended prescribed by GAAP and are therefore unlikely to be December 31, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Investing in Canada Four Examples of Impact Investing in Canada Today
    STATE OF THE NATION IMPACT INVESTING IN CANADA FOUR EXAMPLES OF IMPACT INVESTING IN CANADA TODAY 1 2 FIRA FONDs d’INVESTISSEMENT SOLAR SHARE COMMUNITY BOND POUR LA RELÈVE AGRICOLE Created in 2010 by TREC Renewable Energy In 2010, the FONDS de solidarité FTQ, the Government Co-op. Solar Share is a non-profit co-op- of Québec and Desjardins Capital joined to create The erative with a mission to develop commu- Fonds d’investissemnet pour la relève agricole (FIRA), nity-based solar electricity generation in a $75-million private fund established to support Ontario by engaging residents and investors sustainable agriculture and encourage the next gen- in projects that offer tangible financial, so- eration of farmers in Quebec. The program provides cial and environmental returns. Solar Share patient capital in the form of subordinated loans or bonds are backed by 20-year government lease agreements of farmland, allowing young farm- agreements under Ontario’s Feed-in Tariff ers time to establish their agricultural business in program and are secured by mortgages on the early years. Property acquisition by FIRA allows title. Ontario residents who become Solar for 15-year leases with exclusive right of redemption Share Co-op members can purchase the through entire lease. bonds on a five-year term. Learn more: www.lefira.ca Learn more: www.solarbonds.ca 3 4 RENEWAL3 RBC GENERATOR FUND Renewal3 is part of Renewal Funds; it was started by The RBC Generator Fund was established Carol Newell and Joel Solomon, who met through a in 2012, as a $10-million pool of capital to network of individuals using wealth for good.
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
    Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Citation: West Edmonton Mall Property Inc v Proctor, 2020 ABQB 161 Date: 20200302 Docket: 1903 23107 Registry: Edmonton Between: West Edmonton Mall Property Inc and David Ghermezian Plaintiffs - and - Dana Proctor a.k.a. Debbie Dana Marie Proctor a.k.a. Dana Cole a.k.a. Dana Cole Proctor a.k.a. Dana Graham a.k.a. Jane Doe Defendant _______________________________________________________ Reasons for Judgment of the Honourable Mr. Justice Douglas R. Mah _______________________________________________________ A. Background [1] The Defendant, Dana Proctor, says that she speaks truth to power and nothing more. Her medium of expression is the internet, by way of her own Youtube channel and various social media platforms. [2] The Plaintiffs, West Edmonton Mall and its principal, David Ghermezian, say that Ms. Proctor is a dangerous internet troll who traffics in racist and defamatory screed. They have commenced a defamation action and say she must be stopped once and for all. [3] In this application, WEM and David seek by procedural means to nullify Ms. Proctor’s defence of their action and her counterclaim, and thereby put themselves in a position to obtain a permanent injunction as a final remedy. They do so by applying for this hierarchy of procedural remedies (in order of preference): Page: 2 striking of Ms. Proctor’s pleadings (both statement of defence and counterclaim) under Rule 3.68; summary disposition with regard to both the claim and the counterclaim under Rule 7.3; dealing with Ms. Proctor’s pleadings (both statement of defence and counterclaim) under Civil Practice Note 7 pertaining to vexatious proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (.PDF)
    INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Hockey’s Stars and the Mega Mall .................. 1-2 THE Snapshot.................................................................2 Legislative Session ................................................3 Member Profiles ...................................................4 Connection MSCA President’s Letter ......................................5 Minnesota Marketplace ................................... 6-7 Rising Star: Alchemy ...........................................7 Click on STARRSM Awards Recap ................................ 8-12 article title to Year End Ceremonies .........................................13 link direct to MSCA Leadership ..............................................14 that page! Calendar of Events & Corp. Sponsors .............15 JANUARY 2017 FEATURE ARTICLE Hockey’s Stars and the Mega Mall by Johnny Reimann, MID-AMERICA REAL ESTATE – MINNESOTA, LLC IT WAS 1992, AND PRE-OBITUARIES WERE BEING WRITTEN ABOUT THE NEW in 2012 and Saks Fifth Avenue Almost 25 MALL OF AMERICA (MOA) OPENING LATE SUMMER THAT YEAR. THE couldn’t last downtown, opting to years later, the re-open as Off Fifth. The Twin Cities Stars – still in GHERMEZIAN FAMILY’S PROJECT WAS TOO AMBITIOUS THEY SAID – A MEGA is an affluent market compared to MALL OF ALMOST 4 MILLION SQUARE FEET IN BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA? the average, but a conservative base Dallas – won where people generally don’t flaunt a Stanley Cup, Meanwhile, Minnesota North Stars and the mall is one of the most their wealth. I believe tourism will and the mall is owner Norm Green was preparing iconic shopping destinations in the have to sustain additional luxury one of the most to relocate the team. Urban legend country. Space was delivered late retail at MOA. Of the 40 million + iconic shopping abounds as to why Green moved the last year for a 750,000 square foot annual visitors, 40% are tourists. destinations in team from hockey-rich Minnesota “phase II” near the ground in north MOA offers travel packages from to Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocanada Inc
    2018 Annual Information Form Dated: March 14, 2019 Annual Information Form Table of Contents GENERAL DISCLOSURE MATTERS 1 CAPITAL STRUCTURE 35 Certain References and Glossary 1 AutoCanada Inc. 35 Date of Information 1 CREDIT RATINGS 36 Forward Looking Information 1 DIVIDENDS/DISTRIBUTIONS 37 Non-GAAP Measures 3 Dividend Policy 37 CORPORATE STRUCTURE 4 Historical Distributions 37 Intercorporate Relationships 4 MARKET FOR SECURITIES 38 OVERVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT OF 5 OUR BUSINESS Trading Price and Volume 38 Overview 5 Prior Sales 38 History 6 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 39 Significant Acquisitions 8 Corporate Cease Trade Orders or Bankruptcies 40 Our Operations 9 Personal Bankruptcies 40 Sources of Revenue and Gross Profit 9 Conflicts of Interest 40 Locations 14 Charter of the Audit Committee 40 Acquisitions, Divestitures, Investments and Relocations 15 Composition of the Audit Committee 40 Competition 17 Relevant Education and Experience 40 Our Competitive Strengths 17 External Auditor Service Fees (by category) 42 Inventories 18 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND Automobile Dealership Franchise Agreements 19 REGULATORY ACTIONS 42 Financing 21 INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND Marketing 23 OTHERS IN MATERIAL Management Information Systems 24 TRANSACTIONS 42 Employees 24 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 42 Our Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights 25 Regulatory Matters and Policies 25 MATERIAL CONTRACTS 43 RISK FACTORS 26 INTEREST OF EXPERTS 43 Risks Related to Our Business and the Industry in ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 43 Which We Operate 26 SCHEDULE A — GLOSSARY OF TERMS 44 SCHEDULE B — AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER 46 General Disclosure Matters Certain References and management’s expected usage of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures; Glossary expectations of reduced supply of off- lease vehicles in the future; In this Annual Information Form (“AIF”), unless the context otherwise requires, references to expectations that an extended “AutoCanada”, “ACI”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, manufacturer’s warranty will increase our “our” or similar terms refer to AutoCanada Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Canada's Largest Credit Unions
    2016 50 Analysis of Canada’s Table of Contents Largest Credit Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2Unions Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Economic Growth in Canada Remained Steady……………………………………………………………….…………………..6 Lending Activity – Residential Mortgages………………………………………………………………………..……………… 8 Housing Market in Canada………………… ……………………………………………………………………..……………………10 Lending Activity - Consumer Credit…………………………………………..………………………………..………………..….15 Canadian Credit Union System……………………………………………………………………………………..……..….…….… . 19 Membership…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….19 For the period ending Consolidation of Credit Unions………………………………………………………………………………………………….……..23 Branch Network…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………….24December 31, 2016 Assets……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….25 Deposits and Savingss……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….27 Loans………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. .29 Overview of Credit Union System: Canada vs. United States…………………………………………………………… ..30 Credit Unions’ participation in the Brokerage Industry………………………………………………………………………….35 Prepared by: On-Line Deposit Taking Institutions……………………………………………………………………………………..……………....53 Canada's Top 100 Employers…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………58Bob Leshchyshen, MBA, CFA Comparison of Domestic Banks vs Largest Credit Unions in Canada………………………………………………………65 Assets under
    [Show full text]