DOCSLIB.ORG

BLR 2020 2 Komplet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SEMI-ANNUAL SCHOLARLY LEGAL JOURNAL OF COMENIUS UNIVERSITY IN BRATISLAVA FACULTY OF LAW ISSN (print): 2585-7088 ISSN (online): 2644-6359 EV: 5519/17 DOI: 10.46282/blr.2020.4.2 EDITOR IN CHIEF Ondrej Blažo / Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia EDITORIAL BOARD Ondrej Hamuľák / Palacký University in Olomouc, Czechia secretary of editorial board Rainer Arnold / University of Regensburg, Germany Gábor Hamza / Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest, Hungary Matej Horvat / Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Philip M. Genty / Columbia Law School, USA Peter Lysina / Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Joseph Marko / University of Graz, Austria Katrin Nyman-Metcalf / Talinn University of Technology, Estonia Matthias Niedobitek / Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany Wojciech Piątek /Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland Václav Stehlík /Palacký University in Olomouc, Czechia Tomáš Strémy /Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia Márton Várju /Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary Laurent Waelkens / KU Leuven, Belgium EDITORIAL OFFICE CONTACT executive editor: Comenius University in Bratislava Olexij M. Meteňkanyč Faculty of Law Šafárikovo nám. 6 junior executive editors: 811 00 Bratislava Adam Köszeghy Slovakia Adam Máčaj [email protected] Terézia Švedová Published twice a year by Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law print and online: https://blr.flaw.uniba.sk https://doi.org/10.46282/blr Volume 4 Issue 2 was published 31 December 2020 Texts © Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Law and authors, 2020 Cover and Layout © Štefan Blažo, 2020 The readers may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of all of the Article of the Journal and use them for any other lawful purpose under specified Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). ABOUT THE JOURNAL Bratislava Law Review is an international legal journal published by the Faculty of Law of Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia (till the end of 2019 it was published by Wolters Kluwer in cooperation with the Faculty of Law of the Comenius University in Bratislava). It seeks to support legal discourse and research and promote critical legal thinking in a global extent. The journal offers a platform for fruitful scholarly discussions via various channels – be it lengthy scholarly papers, discussion papers, book reviews, annotations or conference reports. Bratislava Law Review focuses on publishing papers not only from the area of legal theory and legal philosophy but also other topics with international aspects (international law, EU law, regulation of the global business). Comparative papers and papers devoted to interesting trends and issues in national law that reflect various global challenges and could inspire legal knowledge and its application in other countries are also welcomed. The Bratislava Law Review has adopted multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary, but also cross-disciplinary coverage. This is also the reason why members of the Bratislava Law Review Editorial Board are experts both in legal sciences and legal practice as well as in related disciplines – to ensure cross-cutting knowledge throughout all legal sciences, branches and fields of law. The Editorial Board consisting of foreign scholars-experts in the above fields, as well as a double-blind external peer review, provide a guarantee of the high standard of the contributions published. In this way, the Bratislava Law Review hopes to provide space for presenting a diversity of opinions and approaches to up-to- date legal issues and problems, aiming in this way to contribute to an overall rise in standards of legal science in the CEE region. SECTION POLICIES Studies and articles Studies and articles are peer-reviewed papers bringing deep and comprehensive analyses of international law, European law, legal theory, legal philosophy, legal history or comparative law. If covering national jurisdiction, they shall have solid comparative importance. Discussion papers and commentaries Discussion papers usually cover one jurisdiction or particular legal regulation with relevant comparative impact or particular legal problem. Commentaries shall provide insight and evaluation of selected legislation or case law relevant to CEE legal environment and legal tradition. Both discussion papers and commentaries are peer- reviewed. Special sections Special sections contain peer-reviewed studies and articles. Topic of special section and selection of papers is suggested by guest editors who also recommend authors and their papers, and it is usually outcome of particular research group or research task. Obviously, special section status does not relieve papers from standard review procedures and the criteria are the same as the criteria for studies and articles. Reviews and reports Reviews and reports shall bring notices and information on scientific publications and scientific events. They are not subject to peer-review. INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS Publishing with the scientific journal Bratislava Law Review means publishing with the Faculty of Law of Comenius University in Bratislava, the oldest and leading law school in Slovakia. The Journal seeks to publish original research papers that make a significant contribution to all fields of law, in particular European, comparative and international law. To achieve the aim of the journal, we encourage authors to submit significant articles from all other branches of law and legal scholarship that can help shape the everchanging legal knowledge in the area of Central and Eastern Europe and in particular the V4 countries and Danube region. Book reviews, annotations and various legal and scholarly reports are also accepted for publication. Bratislava Law Review is committed to support the growth of new generation of researchers and scholars in all fields of legal studies and the journal therefore accepts also junior researchers´ papers (particularly students enrolled in Ph.D., JSD and equal study programmes). The papers shall be submitted directly via journal‘s webpage which enables authors to follow editorial process All papers are subject to an anti-plagiarism check via iThenticate. The paper shall be written and submitted in the standard editable format of text editor (e.g. doc, docx, rtf). The authors are expected to deliver the proposed articles in correct English (British standard). Each study and scientific article shall contain an abstract which summarizes the research aims of the paper, the structure of the paper as well as outlines conclusions. Keywords shall enable enhancing searchability of the papers and grouping papers of similar topics, so we suggest choosing, on the one hand, keywords general enough, on the other hand, precise enough in order to characterize the paper properly. Jurisdiction and area of law shall be included in key words. We kindly ask potential authors to respect quotation standards of Author-Date System (APA Style). References should cover solely the items referred to or cited in the text, no papers cited from a secondary source should be included in the references. In each reference item, the author must include its assigned DOI (if applicable). Detailed guidelines for authors can be found on the journal’s webpage. Submissions are free of charge. Authors, reviewers and editorial team shall follow the Editorial Ethics and the Code of Conduct published on the journal’s webpage. Forthcoming issues: 2021, volume 5, issue 1 Deadline for submission of papers: 15th March 2021 Review procedure and editing process: March-June 2021 Foreseen date of publication: June 2021 2021, volume 5, issue 2 Deadline for submission of papers: 15th September 2021 Review procedure and editing process: September-November 2021 Foreseen date of publication: December 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS: ARTICLES International Trade Law and Emerging Technologies – A Conceptual Framework Balázs Horváthy _____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 Paying Taxes in the Digital Age Matej Kačaljak _____________________________________________________________________________________ 21 About Non-Positivist Perspective on Legal Values in International Law Mario Krešić _______________________________________________________________________________________ 31 Interpreting Law through International Judicial Dialogue by Polish Courts Magdalena Matusiak-Frącczak ____________________________________________________________________ 49 Guilty of Not Doing That! Marco Mazzocca __________________________________________________________________________________ 71 Apply or Not To Apply? A Comparative View on Territorial Application of CCPA and GDPR Matúš Mesarčík ___________________________________________________________________________________ 81 Do the New Peace Agreements between Israel and the Gulf States Set a 'Honey Trap' for Israel? Nellie Munin _______________________________________________________________________________________ 95 Schrems II: Will It Really Increase the Level of Privacy Protection against Mass Surveillance? Lusine Vardanyan, Václav Stehlík __________________________________________________________________ 111 Scandinavian Legal Realism and the Challenge of Recognizing Emergency Medical Service as a Legal Norm Jenna Uusitalo ___________________________________________________________________________________ 129 Private Antitrust Enforcement in Digital Market Dominik Wolski ___________________________________________________________________________________
Recommended publications
  • Dossier: Realismo Jurídico Contemporáneo

    Dossier: Realismo Jurídico Contemporáneo

    º , . Dossier: º , . Realismo jurídico contemporáneo Iuris Dictio Director editorial Diego Falconí Trávez Coordinador editorial Efraín Caravantes Comité científico Catalina Botero (Universidad de los Andes, Colombia), Paolo Carozza (Notre Dame University, Estados Unidos), Larry Catá Backer (Penn State Law, Estados Unidos), Fabián Corral Burbano de Lara (Academia Ecuatoriana de la Lengua, Ecuador), Alejandro Guzmán (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Chile), András Jakab (Instituto de Estudios Jurídicos de la Academia Húngara de las Ciencias, Hungría), Esther Torrellas (Universidad de Salamanca, España), Peter Van den Bossche (Maastricht University, Holanda), Virginia Zambrano (Universidad de Salerno, Italia). Comité editorial Marena Briones, Eddy de la Guerra, Johanna Fröhlich, Andrés Felipe López Latorre, Andrés Martínez, Álvaro Paúl, José Gustavo Prieto, Daniela Salazar. Asistentes editoriales Analía Andrade, Aura Chiriboga, José Gabriel Cornejo, Sebastián Correa, Josselyn Espinosa, María Paula Marroquín. Diseñadora Mayra Overney-Falconí Webmaster Jaime Páez Maquetador Krushenka Bayas Traductora Megan Edwards Revisores pares Sebastián Agüero, Pablo Alarcón, Toalí Bayancela, Andrés Botero, Juan Cevallos, Eddy de la Guerra, Diego Falconí, Johanna Fröhlich, Juan Francisco González, Pau Luque, Luca Malagoli, Marco Morales, Diego Moreno Cruz, Mareva Orozco, Giuseppa Ottimofiore, Lina Parra, Pier Paolo Pigozzi, Juan Carlos Prado, Julieta Rábanos, Pablo Rapetti, Sebastián Reyes, Catherine Ricaurte, Marco Segatti, Farith Simon, Vicente Solano, Rafael Vásquez, Jaime Vintimilla, Matija Zgur Licencia legal: Reconocimiento- NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. LC: KHK 10 .I97 CDD: 340.05 Iuris Dictio [Publicación Periódica] / Revista del Colegio de Jurisprudencia de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Año 1, No 1 (ene 2000), Quito: Universidad San Francisco de Quito, 2000-v. Semestral –junio-diciembre ISSN: 1390-6402 e-ISSN: 2528-7834 1.
  • Deutscher Bundestag Gesetzentwurf

    Deutscher Bundestag Gesetzentwurf

    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 14/533 14. Wahlperiode 16. 03. 99 Gesetzentwurf der Abgeordneten Dr. Peter Struck, Otto Schily, Wilhelm Schmidt (Salzgitter), Kerstin Müller (Köln), Rezzo Schlauch, Kristin Heyne, Dr. Wolfgang Gerhardt, Dr. Guido Westerwelle, Jörg van Essen, Dieter Wiefelspütz, Ludwig Stiegler, Marieluise Beck (Bremen), Cem Özdemir, Rainer Brüderle Brigitte Adler, Gerd Andres, Rainer Arnold, Hermann Bachmaier, Ernst Bahr, Doris Barnett, Dr. Hans Peter Bartels, Ingrid Becker-Inglau, Wolfgang Behrendt, Dr. Axel Berg, Hans-Werner Bertl, Friedhelm Julius Beucher, Petra Bierwirth, Rudolf Bindig, Lothar Binding (Heidelberg), Klaus Brandner, Willi Brase, Dr. Eberhard Brecht, Rainer Brinkmann (Detmold), Bernhard Brinkmann (Hildesheim), Hans-Günter Bruckmann, Hans Büttner (Ingolstadt), Dr. Michael Bürsch, Ursula Burchardt, Hans Martin Bury, Marion Caspers-Merk, Wolf-Michael Catenhusen, Dr. Herta Däubler-Gmelin, Dr. Peter Wilhelm Danckert, Christel Deichmann, Rudolf Dreßler, Detlef Dzembritzki, Dieter Dzewas, Sebastian Edathy, Marga Elser, Peter Enders, Gernot Erler, Petra Ernstberger, Annette Faße, Lothar Fischer (Homburg), Gabriele Fograscher, Iris Follak, Norbert Formanski, Rainer Fornahl, Dagmar Freitag, Peter Friedrich (Altenburg), Lilo Friedrich (Mettmann), Harald Friese, Anke Fuchs (Köln), Arne Fuhrmann, Iris Gleicke, Günter Gloser, Uwe Göllner, Renate Gradistanac, Günter Graf (Friesoythe), Dieter Grasedieck,Wolfgang Grotthaus, Karl-Hermann Haack (Extertal), Hans-Joachim Hacker, Klaus Hagemann, Manfred Hampel, Alfred Hartenbach,
  • Expulsion of Aliens

    Expulsion of Aliens

    United Nations A/CN.4/565 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 July 2006 Original: English International Law Commission Fifty-eighth session Geneva, 1 May-9 June and 3 July-11 August 2006 Expulsion of aliens Memorandum by the Secretariat Summary The present study was prepared to assist the International Law Commission in the consideration of the topic of the expulsion of aliens. The study endeavours to provide a comprehensive analysis of the possible issues which may require consideration in the context of the present topic. It further provides an analytical summary of the relevant legal materials contained in treaty law, international jurisprudence, other international documents, national legislation and national jurisprudence. It surveys relevant materials adopted at the international level, the regional level as well as the national level. It also reproduces the relevant extracts of the various legal materials for ease of reference. The study is based on the premise that every State has the right to expel aliens. However, this right is subject to general limitations as well as specific substantive and procedural requirements. Traditionally, the right of expulsion was subject to general limitations such as the prohibition of abuse of rights, the principle of good faith, the prohibition of arbitrariness and standards relating to the treatment of aliens. Contemporary international human rights law has had a significant impact on the law relating to the expulsion of aliens in terms of the development of more specific substantive and procedural requirements. Recent trends in national law and practice with respect to the expulsion of aliens suspected of involvement in international terrorism may raise issues with respect to compliance with these requirements.
  • Fraktion Intern Nr. 3/2017

    Fraktion Intern Nr. 3/2017

    fraktion intern* INFORMATIONSDIENST DER SPD-BUNDESTAGSFRAKTION www.spdfraktion.de nr. 03 . 12.07.2017 *Inhalt ................................................................................................................................................................................ 02 Völlige Gleichstellung: Ehe für alle gilt! 10 Mehr Transparenz über Sponsoring 03 Editorial bei Parteien 03 Bund investiert in Schulsanierung 11 Kinderehen werden verboten 04 Betriebsrente für mehr Beschäftigte 11 Paragraph 103 „Majestätsbeleidigung“ 05 Ab 2025: Gleiche Renten in Ost und West wird abgeschafft 05 Krankheit oder Unfall sollen nicht 12 Damit auch Mieter etwas von der arm machen Energiewende haben 06 Neuordnung der 12 Kosten der Energiewende Bund-Länder-Finanzbeziehungen gerechter verteilen 07 Privatisierung der Autobahnen verhindert 13 Pflegeausbildung wird reformiert 08 Einbruchdiebstahl 13 Bessere Pflege in Krankenhäusern soll effektiver bekämpft werden 14 24. Betriebs- und Personalrätekonferenz 08 Rechtssicherheit für WLAN-Hotspots 14 Afrika braucht nachhaltige Entwicklung 09 Rechtsdurchsetzung 15 33 SPD-Abgeordnete in sozialen Netzwerken wird verbessert verabschieden sich aus dem Bundestag 10 Keine staatliche Finanzierung 16 Verschiedenes für verfassungsfeindliche Parteien Mehr Informationen gibt es hier: www.spdfraktion.de www.spdfraktion.de/facebook www.spdfraktion.de/googleplus www.spdfraktion.de/twitter www.spdfraktion.de/youtube www.spdfraktion.de/flickr fraktion intern nr. 03 · 12.07.17 · rechtspolitik Völlige Gleichstellung: Ehe
  • The European Parliament Following the 2009 Elections New Tasks in Light of the Lisbon Treaty

    The European Parliament Following the 2009 Elections New Tasks in Light of the Lisbon Treaty

    Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Representation in Poland The Independent Institute of International and European Law demosEUROPA – the Center for European Strategy Department of International Law and EU Law, Leon Kozmiński University The European Parliament following the 2009 elections New tasks in light of the Lisbon Treaty Edited by Jan Barcz and Barbara Janusz-Pawletta Warszawa 2009 1 Translated by: Karolina Podstawa and Philip Earl Steele Edited by: Philip Earl Steele 2 Contents: About our authors and editors………………………………………………………. 4 List of abbreviations ………………………………………………………………… 5 Foreword ……………………………………………………………………………. 7 Introduction: Peter Hengstenberg ………………………………………………………… 9 Part One: Political aspects of the elections to the European Parliament and the political challenges arising from the Lisbon Treaty concerning the European Parliament and national parliaments • After the elections to the European Parliament, June 9, 2009: Mikołaj Dowgielewicz ………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 • Time for a multilevel parliamentary system: for the sake of a citizen-friendly Europe: MichaelRoth,,AlexandraBrzezinski……………………………………………….. 18 • The new challenges before national parliaments: Edmund Wittbrodt .……… 33 • A few remarks from a political scientist in regard to the outcomes of the elections to the European Parliament in 2009: Robert Smoleń…………………………………. 38 Part Two: The Legal and Political Strengthening of the Status of the European Parliament in light of Lisbon Treaty provisions • National Parliaments in the Lisbon Treaty: Rainer Arnold……………………
  • Defence and Security Committee

    Defence and Security Committee

    DEFENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE MEETING SUNDAY 27 MAY 2018 Sejm Plenary Hall DSC 244 DSC 17 E Original: English NATO Parliamentary Assembly SUMMARY of the meeting of the Defence and Security Committee Plenary Hall, Senate, The Parliament (Senate and Chamber of Deputies) of Romania Bucharest, Romania Saturday 7 and Sunday 8 October 2017 www.nato-pa.int October 2017 244 DSC 17 E ATTENDANCE LIST Committee Chairperson Raymond KNOPS (Netherlands) General Rapporteur Joseph A. DAY (Canada) Special Rapporteur Wolfgang HELLMICH (Germany) President of the NATO PA Paolo ALLI (Italy) Secretary General of the NATO PA David HOBBS Member delegations Albania Mimi KODHELI Perparim SPAHIU Xhemal QEFALIA Belgium Peter BUYSROGGE Karolien GROSEMANS Sébastian PIRLOT Karl VANLOUWE Veli YÜKSEL Bulgaria Hristo GADZHEV Simeon SIMEONOV Canada Leona ALLESLEV Pierre-Hugues BOISVENU Michael COOPER Pierre PAUL-HUS Croatia Miro KOVAC Czech Republic Patrik KUNCAR Martin SEDLAR Denmark Peter Juel JENSEN Estonia Hannes HANSO Marko MIHKELSON France Sonia KRIMI Jean-Charles LARSONNEUR Joachim SON-FORGET Germany Rainer ARNOLD Lorenz CAFFIER Karin EVERS-MEYER Wolfgang HELLMICH Anita SCHÄFER Greece Andreas LOVERDOS Ioannis PLAKIOTAKIS Hungary Matyas FIRTL Italy Lorenzo BATTISTA Luciano URAS Vito VATTUONE Latvia Artis RASMANIS Lithuania Juozas OLEKAS Montenegro Obrad Miso STANISIC Netherlands Bastiaan van APELDOORN Franklin van KAPPEN Raymond de ROON Herman SCHAPER i 244 DSC 17 E Norway Sverre MYRLI Poland Waldemar ANDZEL Przemyslaw CZARNECKI Jan DOBRZYNSKI Stanislaw PIETA Portugal Joao REBELO Romania Nicu FALCOI Mihai Valentin POPA Slovakia Anton HRNKO Slovenia Matjaz NEMEC Spain Eugenio Jesus GONZALVEZ Gabino PUCHE Luis RODRIGUEZ-COMENDADOR Turkey Ziya PIR Sirin UNAL United Kingdom Lord CAMPBELL OF PITTENWEEM Kevan JONES Madeleine MOON Alec SHELBROOKE Bob STEWART United States Paul COOK Thomas MARINO Michael R.
  • Legal Thinking Revised

    Legal Thinking Revised

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1959 Legal Thinking Revised Max Rheinstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Max Rheinstein, "Legal Thinking Revised," 33 Tulane Law Review 728 (1959). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVIEWS LEGAL THINKING REVISED. By A. Vilhelm Lundstedt. Stock- holm: Almqvist and Wiksell. 1956. Pp. 420. What are the right mental processes by which issues of law are to be determined? This question of the "right" legal method has prominently occupied the minds of legal thinkers, especially of the earlier decades of the twentieth century. Mental processes which had been applied during the nineteenth century and had come to be regarded as being self-evident and as the only possible ones, came to be questioned and attacked, and different approaches came to be advocated as more appropriate for the solution of the legal prob- lems of the new century. The country in which the methodological question was raised earliest was Germany, where the traditional method of the nineteenth century Pandectists was attacked in the 1860s by von Buelow and somewhat later, more violently and with greater efficacy, by von Jhering. Around the turn of the century the question de la mfthode was raised in France by G~ny, Saleilles and Duguit.
  • Israeli-German Relations in the Years 2000-2006: a Special Relationship Revisited

    Israeli-German Relations in the Years 2000-2006: a Special Relationship Revisited

    Israeli-German Relations in the Years 2000-2006: A Special Relationship Revisited Helene Bartos St. Antony’s College Trinity Term 2007 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Modern Middle Eastern Studies Faculty of Oriental Studies University of Oxford To my mother and Joe Acknowledgements I would like to use the opportunity to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Emanuele Ottolenghi, who generously agreed to oversee my thesis from afar having taken up his post as the Executive Director of the Transatlantic Institute in Brussels in September 2006. Without his full-hearted support and his enduring commitment my research would not have materialised. I am further deeply indebted to Dr. Michael Willis who dedicated his precious time to discuss with me issues pertaining to my research. Special thanks also goes to Dr. Philip Robins, Senior Tutor at St. Antony’s College, for having supported my field work in Germany in the summer vacation of 2006 with a grant from the Carr and Stahl Funds, and to the Hebrew and Jewish Studies Committee and Near and Middle Eastern Studies Committee for having awarded me two research grants to finance my field work in Israel in the winter of 2006. Without listing everyone personally, I would like to thank all my interview partners as well as colleagues and friends who shared with me their thoughts on the nature of the Israeli-German relationship. Having said all this, it is only due to my mother and my boyfriend Joe who have supported me throughout six not always easy years that I have been able to study at Oxford.
  • Plenarprotokoll 18/199

    Plenarprotokoll 18/199

    Plenarprotokoll 18/199 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 199. Sitzung Berlin, Donnerstag, den 10. November 2016 Inhalt: Glückwünsche zum Geburtstag der Abge- Kommerz, für soziale und Genderge- ordneten Manfred Behrens und Hubert rechtigkeit und kulturelle Vielfalt Hüppe .............................. 19757 A Drucksachen 18/8073, 18/10218 ....... 19760 A Begrüßung des neuen Abgeordneten Rainer Marco Wanderwitz (CDU/CSU) .......... 19760 B Hajek .............................. 19757 A Harald Petzold (Havelland) (DIE LINKE) .. 19762 A Wahl der Abgeordneten Elisabeth Burkhard Blienert (SPD) ................ 19763 B Motschmann und Franz Thönnes als Mit- glieder des Stiftungsrates der Stiftung Zen- Tabea Rößner (BÜNDNIS 90/ trum für Osteuropa- und internationale DIE GRÜNEN) ..................... 19765 C Studien ............................. 19757 B Dr. Astrid Freudenstein (CDU/CSU) ...... 19767 B Erweiterung und Abwicklung der Tagesord- Sigrid Hupach (DIE LINKE) ............ 19768 B nung. 19757 B Matthias Ilgen (SPD) .................. 19769 A Absetzung der Tagesordnungspunkte 5, 20, 31 und 41 a ............................. 19758 D Johannes Selle (CDU/CSU) ............. 19769 C Nachträgliche Ausschussüberweisungen ... 19759 A Gedenken an den Volksaufstand in Un- Zusatztagesordnungspunkt 1: garn 1956 ........................... 19759 C Antrag der Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und SPD: Klimakonferenz von Marrakesch – Pariser Klimaabkommen auf allen Ebenen Tagesordnungspunkt 4: vorantreiben Drucksache 18/10238 .................. 19771 C a)
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    PUBLISHED BY BRATISLAVA THE FACULTY OF LAW, COMENIUS UNIVERSITY IN BRATISLAVA LAW ISSN (print): 2585-7088 REVIEW ISSN (electronic): 2644-6359 SCANDINAVIAN LEGAL REALISM AND THE CHALLENGE OF RECOGNIZING EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE AS A LEGAL NORM / Jenna Uusitalo Jenna Uusitalo, M.A. in Law; Abstract: Emergency medical service (EMS) forms a sub-category PhD. student, Faculty of Law, of the internationally recognized right to health. However, despite University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, the codification of the right to health in various human rights 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; conventions which have been implemented in national legislation, [email protected]; EMS still seems to be regarded as an economic expense or a ORCID: 0000-0002-7799-7289. political decision rather than a legal norm or a human right. This paper evaluates the causes for such a misunderstanding, primarily through Scandinavian Legal Realism which emphasizes the social contextualization of law. Supplementary scholarly views, as well as a history of human rights, are also applied to support the main arguments. Essentially, the paper claims that the challenge of recognizing EMS as a legal norm is associated with the relatively abstract and impersonalized nature of emergency care. Key words: Emergency Medical Service; Human Rights; Legal Philosophy; Scandinavian Legal Realism Suggested citation: Uusitalo, J. (2020). Scandinavian Legal Realism and the Challenge Submitted: 06 July 2020 of Recognizing Emergency Medical Service as a Legal Norm. Accepted: 07 September
  • The Concept of Scandinavian Realism

    The Concept of Scandinavian Realism

    THE CONCEPT OF SCANDINAVIAN REALISM SAEESH NAIK FY. LLM JURISPRUDENCE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SR NO. CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 BASIC FEATURES OF 5 REALIST SCHOOL 3 THE SCANDINAVIAN 6 REALISTS 4 PHILOSOPHICAL 7 BACKGROUND 5 AXEL HAGERSTORM 9 6 KARL OLIVECRONA 12 7 ALF ROSS 17 8 ANDERS VILHELM 19 LUNDSTEDT 9 LAW AS FACT 21 10 CRITICISM AGAINST 24 REALISM 11 REALISM IN THE INDIAN 25 CONTEXT 12 CONCLUSION 29 13 BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 2 INTRODUCTION In the nineteenth and in the early years of the twentieth century, laissez-faire1 was the dominant creed in America. This creed was associated, in the intellectual sphere, with a certain attachment to what has been called “formalism” in philosophy and the social sciences. This was marked by the reverence for the role of logic and mathematics and ‘a priori’2 reasoning as applied to philosophy, economics and jurisprudence, with but little urge to link these empirically to the facts of life. Yet empirical science and technology were increasingly dominating American society and with this development arose an intellectual movement in favour of treating philosophy and the social sciences, and even logic itself, as empirical studies not rooted in abstract formalism. In America this movement was associated with such figures as William James and Dewey in philosophy and logic, Veblen ion economics, Beard and Robinson in historical studies, and Mr. Justice Holmes in jurisprudence. It is important to note that this movement was especially hostile to the so-called British empirical school derived from Hume, and to which Bentham, Austin and Mill adhered.
  • Teil A: Lobbyismus: Ein Überblick Aus Verschiedenen Perspektiven 1 Lobbyismus Im Medialen Diskurs – Ein Streifzug Durch Die Vergangenen Zehn Jahre

    Teil A: Lobbyismus: Ein Überblick Aus Verschiedenen Perspektiven 1 Lobbyismus Im Medialen Diskurs – Ein Streifzug Durch Die Vergangenen Zehn Jahre

    Otto Brenner Stiftung OBS-Arbeitsheft 70 – Marktordnung für Lobbyisten – ONLINETEIL Andreas Kolbe, Herbert Hönigsberger, Sven Osterberg Teil A: Lobbyismus: Ein Überblick aus verschiedenen Perspektiven 1 Lobbyismus im medialen Diskurs – Ein Streifzug durch die vergangenen zehn Jahre Ein Vorschlag der Otto Brenner Stiftung Frankfurt/Main 2011 TEIL A: LOBBYISMUS: EIN ÜBERBLICK AUS VERSCHIEDENEN PERSPEKTIVEN Teil A: Lobbyismus: Ein Überblick aus verschiedenen Perspektiven 1 Lobbyismus im medialen Diskurs – Ein Streifzug durch die vergangenen zehn Jahre1 Vor dem Regierungsumzug von Bonn nach Ber- gistrierten Verbände und deren Vertreter“ aus lin ist „Lobbyismus“ in der Presseberichterstat- dem Jahr 1972 als Beleg dafür gewertet, dass es tung kaum ein Thema, jedenfalls nicht in der eine Art Registrierungspflicht für Lobbyisten negativen Konnotation, die gegenwärtig domi- bereits gäbe.3 Ansonsten konzentriert sich die niert. Ab 1999 werden die meisten Lobbyismus- Berichterstattung bis Ende des Jahres 2000 Artikel zunächst mit einer Erklärung eingelei- eher deskriptiv auf Verbände und Unterneh- tet, was Lobbyismus ist, woher das Wort stammt mensrepräsentanzen, die nach Berlin gezogen und was es bedeutet. Der Fokus liegt auf der sind. Die Aufmerksamkeit gilt den millionen- Berichterstattung über Lobbyismus in Brüssel. schweren Kontaktvermittlungen von Agnes Das erste Fallbeispiel von „Lobbyeinfluss“ und Hürland-Büning und dem Gebaren des Rüs- „Lobbymacht“ in Deutschland ist die BSE-Krise tungslobbyisten Karlheinz Schreiber. Hin und und die Rolle des Bauernverbandes.2 Dieser wieder wird auch die Rolle von Abgeordneten „Skandal“ zieht eine strukturelle Veränderung in Aufsichtsräten hinterfragt. in der Organisation der Ministerien nach sich. Durch diverse Korruptionsskandale im Jahr Der Ruf nach einem Bundesministerium für Ver- 2001 rückt der „Lobbyismus“ in die Schmier- braucherschutz wird lauter, und Rot-Grün geld- bzw.