DOCSLIB.ORG

Ngā Ūranga Ki Pito-One Shared Path Project: Shared Path Demand and Design Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ngā Ūranga Ki Pito-One Shared Path Project: Shared Path Demand and Design Assessment TR2 SHARED PATH DEMAND ASSESSMENT DEMAND ASSESSMENT SHARED PATH AND DESIGN AND DESIGN REVIEW REVIEW Quality Assurance Prepared by Simon Kennett, Principal Multi-modal Advisor, Safe and Sustainable Technical Services, Transport Services, Waka Kotahi Revision History: Revision Author Reviewer Approved for Issue Name Signature Name Signature Date June Simon Tim Gerry 25/09/2020 2020 Kennett Hughes Dance Quality Information Document Title: Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One Shared Path Project: Shared path demand and design assessment Version: Final Date: 25 September 2020 Prepared by: Simon Kennett Reviewed by: Tim Hughes Approved by: Gerry Dance File Name: Disclaimer This report has been prepared with reference to the best guidelines and information available in mid-2020. NGĀ ŪRANGA KI PITO-ONE SHARED PATH PROJECT: SHARED PATH DEMAND ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW 1 Executive summary The purpose of this assessment is to assess the likely demand for the Ngā Ūranga ki Pito-One Shared Path Project (Project), once constructed, and in light of that demand, review the proposed Project design. The Project has been developed by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) and involves the construction of a shared path from the Ngā Ūranga Interchange to just south of the Pito-One Railway Station in the north.1 The Project is described in detail in section 4 of this report but, at a high level, involves the following: a) A rail overbridge (the shared path bridge) across the Hutt Valley Railway Line, connecting the shared path from Ngā Ūranga to the coastal edge; b) A path with a 5m surface width on existing and newly created land and coastal structures, on the seaward side of the Hutt Valley Railway Line; c) A varied coastal edge which incorporates ūranga (landings), a rocky revetment and the intermittent use of strategically placed seawalls along the path edge. The coastal edge treatment provides resilence, reflects the natural landscape, avoids sensitive habitat areas, provides for cultural expression and enhances amenity; d) Construction of new offshore habitat for coastal avifauna; e) Connections to the Pito-One to Melling (P2M) path and The Esplanade; f) Construction of a new Integrated Clubs Building at the eastern end of the Reserve and an associated car parking area; and g) A two-stage development of new cultural facilities at the Reserve, including: i. Construction of three temporary Tāwharau Pods, consisting of three small building pods designed to accommodate a range of cultural or community uses, at the eastern end of the Reserve; and ii. Post-construction, the construction of a whare to the west of Korokoro Stream, and permanent relocation of the Tāwharau Pods to a site adjacent to the Project at the western end of the Reserve. The Project will deliver a critical link in the existing walking and cycling network by providing a high quality and safe shared path between Ngā Ūranga and Pito-One. The existing facilities in this area are substandard and unsafe. Once constructed, the Project will connect with other paths and future projects at the northern and southern ends, and provide a key link in the network. Together with other projects, the Project forms part of Te Ara Tupua programme of works. The Project also aligns directly with Government Policy Statement objectives. Demand for the Project, once constructed, has been estimated with reference to a previous estimate but updated to reflect more accurate and recent information about shared path use. The estimate has also had reference to existing background growth in active modes in the region, population growth and urban development, comparison with similar projects and demand estimates and other anticipated developments in the network. This assessment has found that: • Within 12 months of completion of the Project, path use will grow to an average of 1,812 visits (total of both directions) per weekday, with 75% of users being people on bikes. AM peak hour use is expected to be 320 people. • A similar number of visits are expected on an average weekend day, although with a significantly higher proportion of users being on foot. • Between 2025 and 2035, path use is expected to double. 1 This report uses the preferred Te Reo spelling of Ngā Ūranga and Pito-One even where the official name may instead use Ngauranga or Petone. Sensitivity: General The proposed design for the Project has been assessed with reference to the above assessment. In general terms, the proposed design is adequate. A key consideration is path width. The proposed path width for this Project is appropriate as it will cater well for immediate and future demand. In particular, the 5m width proposed for the majority of the Project route is necessary to future-proof the Project should demand grow to such a level that separation of cyclists and pedestrians is required in the future. Matters that will require careful consideration in the detailed design phase include: • The path's design through Honiana Te Puni Reserve; • Markings along the Project route to manage potential conflicts between users; • The gradient and frequency of landings on the shared path bridge; • Path surfaces; and • Lighting design. In conclusion, the Project will deliver a high-quality facility between Ngā Ūranga and Pito-One and provide a critical link in the overall cycling and walking network. The proposed Project design is appropriate for the anticipated level of demand, and in particular, the proposed path width of 5m along the majority of the Project route is appropriate and necessary. This report has been prepared in support of the notices of requirement and applications for resource consent for the Project made by Waka Kotahi under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 (COVID-19 Recovery Act). In particular, this report supports the assessment of the Project's effects on the environment as required by the COVID-19 Recovery Act. The requirements of the COVID-19 Recovery Act and an overall assessment of the effects of the Project on the environment are set out in the Assessment of Effects on the Environment. 2 Purpose of assessment The purpose of this assessment is to: • Consider the existing environment for cyclists and pedestrians travelling between Ngā Ūranga and Pito-One; • Assess the likely demand for the proposed shared path once completed; • Assess and review the proposed design of the shared path against its anticipated demand; and • Make recommendations for any changes required to the design and/or operation of the shared path to ensure it is fit for purpose and its positive benefits are maximised as much as possible within site constraints. 3 Qualifications and experience Simon Kennett of Waka Kotahi’s Safe and Sustainable Transport Team, Transport Services, has been engaged to undertake this assessment. I have the following qualifications and experience: • I hold a Bachelor of Science degree (geography), Victoria University, 2001. • I hold a Diploma in Environmental Management, Auckland University, 1999. • I am currently a Principal Multi-modal Advisor in the Safe and Sustainable Transport Team, Transport Services at Waka Kotahi, having been with Waka Kotahi since 2015. Key roles include managing Waka Kotahi's cycling network and design guidance, managing development of research into best practice shared path design and regulation, co-delivering courses on cycle safety and cycleway design, and reviewing major cycleway designs from around the country. • I was a member of the New Zealand Cycling Safety Panel in 2013-14. NGĀ ŪRANGA KI PITO-ONE SHARED PATH PROJECT // 3 Sensitivity: General • I was previously an Active Transport and Road Safety Coordinator at Greater Wellington Regional Council (2009-2015). Key roles included chairing the Regional Active Transport Forum, managing development of the regional walking and cycling journey planner, development of the 2015 regional strategic walking and cycling network maps, and review of walking and cycling policies in the Wellington region. • I was previously a Partner at Kennett Brothers Ltd (cycling writers, publishers, event organisers, consultants, trail designers and builders) (1994-2009). My role included co- writing ‘RIDE – the story of cycling in New Zealand’, work on several council cycling strategies, and coordinating the development of the national cycling advocates network (for Waka Kotahi). I confirm that I have read the Code of Conduct for expert witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014. This assessment has been prepared in compliance with that Code. In particular, unless I state otherwise, this assessment is within my area of expertise and I have not omitted to consider material facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions I express. I have made my employer (Waka Kotahi) aware of my obligation to give independent expert advice when giving evidence under this Code of Conduct. 4 Project description The Project is part of Te Ara Tupua programme of works, which involves the development of pedestrian and cyclist facilities between Wellington CBD, Pito-One and Melling. The Project involves the construction of a shared path from the Ngā Ūranga Interchange to just south of the Pito-One Railway Station in the north and associated works as shown in Figure 1. The Project will cater for active transport modes including cycling and walking, and will provide an alternative to the existing State Highway 2 (SH2) cycle path located between the Hutt Valley Railway Line and the southbound SH2 carriageway. Works at Honiana Te Puni Reserve (the Reserve) provide for the removal and replacement of the existing Wellington Rowing Association and Wellington Water Ski Club facilities at, and adjacent to, the Reserve and the introduction of new cultural facilities into the Reserve. The primary objective of the Project and wider Te Ara Tupua programme is to provide safe walking and cycling infrastructure between Wellington and the Hutt Valley which will act as a catalyst for increased use of active transport modes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wellington Network Upgrade
    WELLINGTON NETWORK UPGRADE Better rail services for the region. Around 500,000 Wellingtonians and visitors take over 14 million passenger journeys each year on our Metro Rail Network. KiwiRail, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Metlink are working together to modernise the rail, thanks to investment of almost $300 million from the Government to enable: Train services to be more reliable. More people and freight travelling on rail in the future. The Wellington Metro Upgrade Programme is being delivered on a busy, well-maintained but ageing network where trains run 18 hours a day. The focus of our work is: Renewing existing network infrastructure to improve rail services. Renewing traction power overhead line system and signals power supply, and improving the track across the network including inside the four major tunnels. Adding capacity to the network so more people can travel on trains in the future while still allowing for freight services. This includes: Double tracking between Trentham and Upper Hutt. Improvements to Wellington station approaches. Changes at Plimmerton. More information www.kiwirail.co.nz (Wellington Metro Upgrade) HUTT LINE DOUBLE TRACKING More frequent, reliable trains. The 2.7 kilometres of rail line between Trentham and Upper Hutt is being double tracked so trains can travel in both directions at the same time. This will allow more frequent and reliable services along this section of the busy line from Wellington to Upper Hutt and Wairarapa. Stations are being upgraded and we are making it safer around our tracks. Wairarapa Existing Upper Hutt Future Connecting new second track to the network Level crossing upgrade at Blenheim Street Wallaceville Closing pedestrian crossing just North of Wallaceville New platform with shelters will be built in the style of Ava’s (pictured).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1 Wellington Regional Rail Strategic Direction 2020.Pdf
    WELLINGTON REGIONAL RAIL STRATEGIC DIRECTION 2020 Where we’ve come from Rail has been a key component of the Wellington Region’s transport network for more than 150 years. The first rail line was built in the 1870s between Wellington and Wairarapa. What is now known as the North Island Main Trunk followed in the 1880s, providing a more direct route to Manawatū and the north. Two branch lines were later added. The region has grown around the rail network, as villages have turned into towns and cities. Much of it was actively built around rail as transit-oriented development. Rail has become an increasingly important way for people to move about, particularly to Wellington’s CBD, and services and infrastructure have been continuously expanded and improved to serve an ever-growing population. The region is a leader in per capita use of public transport. Wellington Region Rail Timeline 1874 1927 1954 1982 2010 2021 First section of railway between Hutt line deviation opened as a branch Hutt line deviation to Manor EM class electric FP ‘Matangi’ class Expected Wellington and Petone between Petone and Waterloo Park, creating Melling line multiple units electric multiple completion 1955 introduced units introduced of Hutt line 1876 1935 Hutt line duplication to Trentham duplication, Hutt line to Upper Hutt Kāpiti line deviation to Tawa, creating 1983 and electrification to Upper Hutt 2011 Trentham to 1880 Johnsonville line Kāpiti line Rimutaka Tunnel and deviation Upper Hutt 1 Wairarapa line to Masterton 1 electrification Kāpiti line 2 1938 replace
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Hutt Valley Line
    2. Hutt Valley Line TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 4 SUMMARY OF HUTT VALLEY LINE TRAIN REPLACEMENT SERVICES OUTBOUND FROM WELLINGTON: When two buses depart for one service: • Bus 1: (Waterloo Loop) Depart Wellington to Ngauranga, drop of Woburn and connect to all stopper at Waterloo • Bus 2: Depart Wellington express to Petone, all stops to Waterloo, connect with Waterloo Loop and all stops to Upper Hutt • Manor Park is serviced by a shuttle operating between Manor Park and Silverstream INBOUND FROM UPPER-HUTT: When two buses are operating one service: • Bus 1: (Waterloo Loop) Departs Waterloo and then all stops to Wellington • Bus 2: Depart Upper Hutt all stops to Waterloo then express to Wellington • Manor Park is serviced by a shuttle operating between Manor Park and Silverstream HVL LINE HVL TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 5 TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 6 HUTT VALLEY LINE BUSES REPLACING TRAIN STOPS Ngauranga Inbound: On Hutt Road, after the underbridge Outbound: On Hutt Road, after the intersection HVL LINEHVL Petone Inbound: On Hutt Road, opposite the station Outbound: Bus stop B on Hutt Road, on the East side of the station TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 7 Ava Inbound: On Wakefield Street near the pedestrian over bridge access Outbound: On Wakefield Street, just before Cuba Street HVL LINE HVL Woburn Inbound: On Cambridge Terrace, opposite the station car park Outbound: The Cambridge Terrace bus shelter in front of the station car park TDW | Transdev Train Replacement Booklet 8 Waterloo
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington City Public Transport Network Transport Public City Wellington KARORI
    Wellington City Public Transport Network Key High frequency bus routes 10-15 minutes daytime 1 2 3 7 21 22 15-60 evenings & weekends Standard bus routes 30-60 minutes all day increased frequency at peak times Peak only bus routes Rail services 34 12e HVL Hutt Valley Line Interchanges MEL Melling Line JVL Johnsonville Line TO TAWA Wellington Harbour Ferry KPL Kapiti¯ Line KENEPURU H WRL Wairarapa Line PORIRUA 60 60e GRENADA 1 VILLAGE 1 Woodridge Glenside 52 19 TO EASTBOURNE, CHURTON PARK 57 LOWER HUTT, aparangi UPPER HUTT & P 58 19e WAIRARAPA Baylands 52 HVL 1 56 NEWLANDS 85x MEL est 84 WRL W JOHNSONVILLE KPL ville 81 n 83 1 Johnso Raroa JVL 24 22 Ngauranga 25 Broadmeadows 24 26 52 illage KhandallahV 83 KHANDALLAH Box Hill 19e N 58 Simla Crescent NGAIO 57 Hutt Rd warua Street A 56 Ngaio 85x ton Downs 25 f Matiu / Somes Island 22 Cro 84 Otari Wilton’s Bush 81 Wilton Mairangi WADESTOWN 14 14 Sky Stadium ty 13 rsi Victorianive U Karori West Thorndon 34 Pipitea WELLINGTON STATION To Days Bay Parliament (Eastbourne) Karori MallNORTHLAND WHF 2 2 18e 37 LAMBTON QY Queens WELLINGTON KARORI Wharf 33 Botanic HARBOUR KARORI TUNNEL KARORI Gardens 18e 21 37 car Cable Willis Street Karori South 22 Te Papa Museum Manners Street Wrights Hill Zealandia Eco-sanctuary 7 27 KELBURNVictoria 14 24 21 Oriental Bay UniversityKelburn COURTENAY PL Victoria 20 Mt Crawford St 25 18e Mt Victoria Taranaki St Lookout 12e Roseneath 24 Miramar Highbury Massey Basin 35 North University 12 Reserve Evans Bay 36 31x 1 23 MIRAMAR 17 3 35 Aro Valley 2 Scorching Bay 32x 29 39 30x Hutchison Maupuia 18e Road 18e HATAITAI HOSPITAL H 20 14 27 NEWTOWN Constable 12e BROOKLYN St 12 18e 12 18e KILBIRNIE 17 Vogeltown SHOPS MIRAMAR 32x 23 30x Kingston 91 Strathmore Kowhai Park Rongotai Park Shops 39 7 Melrose 3 2 SEATOUN o Berhampore Wellingtono 3 Z 29 29 AIRPORT Island Bay 12e Shops39 Happy Valley 36 12 28 30x Southgate STRATHMORE 3 PARK Hill Moa Beacon Point Owhiro Bay 23 29 32x LYALL BAY 1 HOUGHTON BAY ISLAND BAY.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand National Climate Summary 2010: Settled and Warm Annual Mean Sea Level Pressures Were Above Average Over the New Zealand Region in 2010
    NIWA MEDIA RELEASE: 12 JANUARY 2011 New Zealand national climate summary 2010: Settled and warm Annual mean sea level pressures were above average over the New Zealand region in 2010. The increased prevalence of anticyclones (‘highs’) near New Zealand produced a relatively settled climate for the year overall, with average or above average annual temperatures in all regions, normal or above normal sunshine hours in most districts, and drought at either end of the year. The large-scale climate setting changed from a moderate El Niño at the start of the year, to a La Niña by July. The La Niña climate pattern intensified to moderate-to-strong by September, and prevailed through the end of 2010. The Southern Annular Mode (SAM), a climate pattern affecting the westerly wind strength and location over and to the south of the country, was strongly positive overall in 2010. This contributed to the prevalence of anticyclones experienced near New Zealand. Mean annual temperatures were above average (between 0.5°C and 1.2°C above the long-term average) in the northeast of the North Island, and in Nelson, Marlborough, parts of Canterbury, Fiordland and parts of Westland, the southern Lakes District and central Otago. Mean annual temperatures were near average elsewhere (within 0.5°C of the long-term average). The national average temperature for 2010 based on a 7-station series was 13.1 °C, 0.5 °C above the 1971–2000 annual average. 2010 was the 5th warmest year since 1900, based on this 7-station series. The four warmer years were 1971 (+0.6 °C), 1998 (+0.9 °C), 1999 (+0.8 °C), and 2005 (+0.6 °C).
    [Show full text]
  • Buses Replace Trains Temporary Hutt Valley Line Closure
    Buses replace trains Temporary Hutt Valley Line Closure Wellington Anniversary Weekend: Saturday 23 - Monday 25 January 2021 Manor Park Shuttle service Wellington Ngauranga Petone Ava Woburn Waterloo Epuni Naenae Wingate Taitā Pomare Silverstream Heretaunga Trentham Wallaceville Upper Hutt Bus Replacement Timetable Buses replace trains SATURDAY 23, SUNDAY 24 & MONDAY 25 JANUARY 2021 TO WELLINGTON At these minutes past Sat Sat Sat Sat Only Only the hour 8am Only Only until 7pm AM PM AM Upper Hutt Station 5:00 6:00 7:00 7:30 00 30 7:00 7:30 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:01 Wallaceville Station 5:03 6:03 7:03 7:33 03 33 7:03 7:33 8:03 9:03 10:03 11:03 12:04 Trentham Station 5:06 6:06 7:06 7:36 06 36 7:06 7:36 8:06 9:06 10:06 11:06 12:07 Heretaunga Station 5:08 6:08 7:08 7:38 08 38 7:08 7:38 8:08 9:08 10:08 11:08 12:09 Buses replacing trains Silverstream Station 5:12 6:12 7:12 7:42 12 42 7:12 7:42 8:12 9:12 10:12 11:12 12:13 Trentham Station is closed to trains for Manor Park Station shuttle to 5:00 6:00 7:00 7:30 00 30 7:00 7:30 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:01 Silverstream Station platform works but will still be serviced Pomare Station 5:19 6:19 7:19 7:49 19 49 7:19 7:49 8:19 9:19 10:19 11:19 12:20 by planned bus replacements Taitā Station 5:21 6:21 7:21 7:51 21 51 7:21 7:51 8:21 9:21 10:21 11:21 12:22 Wingate Station 5:23 6:23 7:23 7:53 23 53 7:23 7:53 8:23 9:23 10:23 11:23 12:24 Naenae Station 5:26 6:26 7:26 7:56 26 56 7:26 7:56 8:26 9:26 10:26 11:26 12:27 Epuni Station 5:29 6:29 7:29 7:59 29 59 7:29 7:59 8:29 9:29 10:29 11:29 12:30 Waterloo Station
    [Show full text]
  • March 2010 Climate Summary
    NATIONAL CLIMATE CENTRE Thursday 1 April 2010 National Climate Summary – March 2010: Very dry in the northeast, Otago, Canterbury • Rainfall: Extremely dry in the north and east of the North Island, and parts of Canterbury and Otago. A record dry March for Auckland. Wet in Fiordland and parts of Southland. • Soil moisture: Severe soil moisture deficits continue in Northland, Auckland, South Canterbury and Otago. Dry soils have also developed in Waikato, Coromandel, Bay of Plenty, Taupo, and parts of Gisborne and Hawke’s Bay. • Temperature: A much warmer than average March for Nelson, Otago, South Canterbury, and the Lakes District. A cooler than usual March for the West Coast, and from Raglan to Waiouru. Near average temperatures elsewhere. • Sunshine: Extremely sunny for the east coast of the North Island, Wellington, and parts of the Central Plateau and Bay of Plenty regions. More frequent anticyclones (‘highs’) were located in the Tasman Sea during March, producing enhanced southwesterly winds over New Zealand, consistent with the El Niño which has been present since November 2009. This resulted in an extremely dry March for the north and east of the North Island, and South Canterbury and Otago. Severe soil moisture deficits continue in Northland and Auckland, South Canterbury and Otago. Significant soil moisture deficits have also developed in Waikato, Bay of Plenty, Coromandel, Taupo and parts of Gisborne and Hawke’s Bay. Well below normal March rainfall (less than 50 percent of normal) occurred in eastern Northland, Auckland, Coromandel, Waikato, Bay of Plenty, Taupo, Gisborne, Hawkes Bay, parts of South Canterbury and Otago. It was also rather dry over the remainder of the North Island and Nelson, with rainfall totals between 50 and 75 percent of normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland/Wellington Public Transport Comparison
    Board Meeting | 29 April 2014 Agenda item no. 11i Closed Session Auckland/Wellington Public Transport Comparison Recommendation That the board: i. Receives the report. Executive summary A comparison of Auckland and Wellington rail services indicates that Auckland is more expensive than Wellington on a per passenger and per kilometre basis. Many of these key differences will be mitigated when Auckland introduces a new electric fleet of trains. Some are due to the mature nature of Wellington’s public transport usage and to topographical differences. Background The following analysis is not a comprehensive evaluation; it is a comparison of some key statistics at a point in time, based on publically available information. The time for a comprehensive comparison will be after new bus contracts are in place in both cities, having adopted the PTOM contracting model, and after Auckland’s electric trains are in service. Only then will more meaningful like with like comparisons be achievable. Nevertheless, the following quick snap-shot provides some useful insights. While the focus of this memo is on rail, the rail network does not exist in isolation from other public transport. For example, Auckland has a Northern Bus-way and makes extensive use of ferries. Comparison of the wider and integrated public transport system is also considered briefly. The greatest difference between the two cities relates to rail. Wellington has a relatively new electric train fleet servicing a long-established clientele; Auckland is about to change an old diesel service
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand North Island Railways
    NEW ZEALAND (NORTH ISLAND) RAILWAYS - SL 116 09.02.20 page 1 of 8 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Based on Government Rlys Public TTs 1894 (z), 1913 (a), 1924 (b), 1941 (c), 1957 (d), 1976 (e) and 1993 (f). Also 1910 (n), Ideal TT 1917 (p), 1930 (q), 1934 (r), 1950 (s), 1965 (t) & 1984 (u), Working TTs (w), 1925 (w1), 1947 (w2) & 1953 (w3) and Quail Atlas (#). $: stops for school chidren only; $$: railway staff only; y-f = yzabcdef etc. f*: changes since 1993 Former names: [ ] Distances in Miles; Gauge 3’ 6” unless noted; (date)t / (date)w: other public (t) & working (w) TTs op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass? passenger service?; All points served by passenger trains unless shown ( ) or noted. There were a large number of “bush” railways/tramways built primarily for transportation of timber (see Quail Atlas). At least one, Taupo Timber Co., see 12, had a public passenger service and there may have been others. 1. AUCKLAND - OPUA 39.3 Mount Rex z-d + Newmarket cl. 2008>2010 with temporary station at 41.0 Punganui cd [Pukanui zab ] Newmarket West 42.3 Kaukapakapa z(tm)abcd ++ closed 2003, except for excursions, and from 2015 also 45.0 Kanohi abcd used by services to Wellington 48.0 Makarau abcd 51.3 Tahekeroa abcd [Tahakeroa #] 0.5 Auckland Britomart (op.2003) f* 56.0 Ahuroa abcd 0.5 Auckland (2nd) zab 58.5 Woodcocks abcd 0.5 Auckland (1st) (cl.1885) 61.5 Kaipara Flats abcd 0.0 Auckland Strand f* ++ 64.0 Hoteo abcd [Tauhoa # ] [Auckland (3rd) cdef ] 67.7 Wayby abcd 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transport Committee 7 August 2019, Order Paper - Front Page
    Sustainable Transport Committee 7 August 2019, Order Paper - Front Page If calling please ask for: Democratic Services 2 August 2019 Sustainable Transport Committee Order Paper for the meeting of the Sustainable Transport Committee to be held in the Council Chamber, Greater Wellington Regional Council, Level 2, 15 Walter Street, Te Aro, Wellington Wednesday, 7 August 2019 at 9.30am Membership Cr Donaldson (Chair) Cr Ponter (Deputy Chair) Cr Blakeley Cr Brash Cr Gaylor Cr Kedgley Cr Laban Cr Laidlaw Cr Lamason Cr McKinnon Cr Ogden Cr Staples Cr Swain Marama Tuuta Recommendations in reports are not to be construed as Council policy until adopted by Council 1 Sustainable Transport Committee 7 August 2019, Order Paper - Agenda Sustainable Transport Committee Order Paper for the meeting to be held on Wednesday, 7 August 2019 in the Council Chamber, Greater Wellington Regional Council, Level 2, 15 Walter Street, Te Aro, Wellington at 9.30am Public Business Page No. 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of conflict of interest 3. Public participation 4. Confirmation of the Public minutes of 19 June 2019 Report 19.278 3 5. Action items from previous meetings Report 19.290 8 6. Public Transport - operational performance Report 19.293 11 7. Metlink service activities Report 19.294 26 8. Post Implementation Review - next steps Report 19.295 40 programme 9. Notice of motion: Cr Daran Ponter Report 19.325 50 10. General Managers' report to the Sustainable Report 19.299 56 Transport Committee meeting on 7 August 2019 11. Exclusion of the public Report 19.326 67 Public Excluded Business 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Tranz Metro Communications
    Tranz Metro Communications Customer Communications review for the Johnsonville Line 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is 2. Background “-Services on the JVL are experiencing delays of approximately 10 minutes due to slippery track conditions. Updates to follow.” This is an all too familiar text to Johnsonville Line passengers over the past year and a half. 1 M:\National Passenger\Planning and Performance\... • During a slip disruption, RTI boards said shuttle between Ngaio and Johnsonville and buses between Ngaio and Wellington. The word shuttle is confusing. Also, RTI boards not clear on whether or not buses or trains are running. Below are some of the suggestions we have received from passengers about how we can communicate to them better and more efficiently. • It could be grateful if you could run an audit to ensure that all delays are going into the system. • Many of the delays were put on the Tranz Metro text system as "operational reasons", but when he asked train staff why they were late, the answer was slippery tracks. In our view, the information given to passengers needs to be as accurate and consistent as possible. • Surely if the system temporarily cannot show the correct information it would be better switched off. • It would be better if you said "train" instead of "shuttle", because it is not clear whether a "shuttle" means a bus or a train, In fact, everybody went to wait at the bus stop and we only made it because the driver saw us and happened to pick us up. 4. Proposal To try and minimise the effect that delays have on the on time performance of the Johnsonville Line, KiwiRail and Greater Wellington Regional Council trialled a new morning and afternoon peak timetable last October that proved successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Wellington Regional Council Wellington Metropolitan Rail 2017/2018 Annual Report June 2018
    Greater Wellington Regional Council Wellington Metropolitan Rail 2017/2018 Annual Report June 2018 WELLINGTON REGION MAP Waikanae Masterton Upper Hutt Johnsonville Wellington 1 CONTENTS Chairperson’s Report 4 1 Introduction 15 2 Purpose 17 3 Background 19 Governance 19 Wellington Metropolitan Rail Network 20 4 Service Outcomes 23 4.1 Overview 23 4.2 Achievements 23 4.3 Performance Measurement 24 Punctuality 24 Reliability 25 Safety 25 Customer Satisfaction 27 Patronage 28 4.4 Outlook for 2018/19 29 5 Asset Management: rolling stock 31 5.1 Overview 31 5.2 Achievements 31 5.3 Performance Measurement 33 Fleet Reliability 33 Fleet Availability 34 Fleet Maintainability 35 5.4 Outlook for 2018/19 36 6 Asset Management: 37 6.1 Overview 37 6.2 Achievements 38 6.3 Average Condition Grading by Line 39 6.4 OUTLOOK FOR 2018/19 39 2 7 Strategic Management 41 7.1 Framework for the strategic management of metro rail 41 7.2 Performance Measurement 41 Metro Rail Operating Model 41 Wellington Regional Land Transport Strategy 42 Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan 43 Regional Rail Plan 44 Greater Wellington Regional Council Long Term Plan 46 7.3 Outlook for 2018/19 48 Glossary 49 3 CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT British Lions Tour One of the highlights on the region’s rail system was how well it coped with the influx of tourists for the British Lions tour. On the day of the game, we saw an additional 20,000 people travel on our rails. This massive increase in patronage was able to be well-planned for, and our rail operator, Transdev Wellington, was able to provide special services to ensure people were able to travel to and from the game without incident.
    [Show full text]