DOCSLIB.ORG

How Reading Difficulty Influences Mind-Wandering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Reading Difficulty Influences Mind-Wandering View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Waterloo's Institutional Repository How Reading Difficulty Influences Mind-Wandering: The Theoretical Importance of Measuring Interest by Noah Forrin A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2016 © Noah Forrin 2016 i Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering; see Smallwood & Schooler, 2006, for a review). However, Feng, D’Mello, and Graesser (2013) recently reported a discrepant finding in the context of reading. They showed that increasing the objective reading difficulty of passages (by decreasing word frequency and complicating sentence structure) actually increased mind-wandering. The primary goal of this work was to gain insight into the mechanism that drives this positive relation between objective reading difficulty and mind-wandering. This effect is investigated over three chapters. Chapter 1 demonstrates that the effect of objective difficulty on mind-wandering is confounded by differences in passage section-length between easy and hard passages when they are presented one sentence at a time. Chapter 2 more broadly explores the possibility that distinctive processing influences subjective impressions of passage difficulty and interest (which may consequently influence mind-wandering). And Chapter 3 shows that mind-wandering increases over time spent reading, which may be related to decreasing subjective interest. This research builds to the conclusion that subjective interest is of central theoretical importance to research on difficulty and mind-wandering: A manipulation designed to influence the difficulty of a task may also influence participants’ subjective interest in the task, which may in turn influence their tendency to mind-wander. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisors, Daniel Smilek and Colin MacLeod for their continued guidance; Evan Risko for his valued feedback; and my talented team of RAs (Safa Bajwa, Zeynep Ermis, Grace Lin, Tasha McFarland, Amanda Nova, Mona Qutub, Brandon Stolz, Jane Szeto, and Julian Wang) for their help in collecting data. I am also grateful for the unwavering love and support of my parents, Adrian and Bert Forrin, and my partner, Emily Cyr. iv Table of Contents List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………............ vii List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………… ix Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 Experiment 1……………………………………………………………………….. ……. 8 Method…………………………………………………………………....... ……. 9 Results……………………………………………………………………........... 12 Discussion………………………………………………………………………. 18 Experiment 2……………………………………………………………………………. 20 Method………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Results……………………………………………………………………........... 22 Discussion……………………………………………………………………..... 24 Experiment 3……………………………………………………………………………. 26 Method………………………………………………………………………….. 27 Results……………………………………………………………………........... 28 Discussion………………………………………………………………………. 34 Experiment 4…………………………………………………………………………..... 35 Method………………………………………………………………………...... 36 Results…………………………………………………………………………... 37 Discussion…………………………………………………………………......... 41 Experiment 5……………………………………………………………………………. 43 Method………………………………………………………………………...... 44 Results……………………………………………………………………........... 44 Discussion……………………………………………………………………..... 50 Experiment 6…………………………………………………………………………..... 52 Method………………………………………………………………………...... 52 Results ……………………………………………………………………........... 53 Discussion………………………………………………………………………. 57 General Discussion……………………………………………………………………... 58 v Chapter 2………………………………………………………………………………………... 64 Experiment 7……………………………………………………………………………. 67 Method………………………………………………………………………….. 68 Results…………………………………………………………………………... 68 Discussion………………………………………………………………………. 76 Chapter 3……………………………………………………………………………………....... 80 Results…………………………………………………………………………………... 84 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………. 99 Concluding Remarks…………………………………………………………………………... 103 References………………………………………………………………………………........... 106 Appendix A…………………………………………………………………………………..... 115 Appendix B……………………………………………………………………………………. 120 Appendix C……………………………………………………………………………………. 123 Appendix D……………………………………………………………………………………. 125 Appendix E……………………………………………………………………………………. 129 Appendix F…………………………………………………………………………………….. 130 vi List of Tables Table 1. Passage attributes………………………………………………………….......... 10 Table 2. Mean mind-wandering rates in Experiments 1-4……………………………...... 13 Table 3. Mean correctly answered comprehension questions in Experiments 1-4...... …... 14 Table 4. Mean subjective ratings in Experiments 1-2……………………………............. 15 Table 5. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 1 (mean difference scores)……………. 17 Table 6. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 2 (mean difference scores)…………..... 23 Table 7. Mean subjective ratings in Experiments 3-4……………………………………. 30 Table 8. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 3 (mean difference scores)……………. 33 Table 9. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 4 (mean difference scores)……………. 40 Table 10. Mean mind-wandering rates in Experiments 5-6……………………………….. 45 Table 11. Mean correctly answered comprehension questions in Experiments 5-6………. 46 Table 12. Mean subjective ratings in Experiments 5-6……………………………………. 47 Table 13. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 5 (mean difference scores)……………. 48 Table 14. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 6 (mean difference scores)……………. 56 Table 15. Mean mind-wandering rates in Experiment 7…………………………………... 69 Table 16. Mean correctly answered comprehension questions in Experiment 7…............. 70 Table 17. Mean subjective ratings in Experiment 7……………………………...........….. 72 Table 18. Correlation coefficients in Experiment 7 (mean difference scores)……………. 73 Table 19. Mean mind-wandering rates over blocks………………….……………………. 88 Table 20. Mean correctly answered comprehension questions over blocks in Experiments 1 and 3…………………………………………………………...... 89 Table 21. Mean writing interest ratings over blocks in Experiments 1 and 3……………... 90 Table 22. Mean topic interest ratings over blocks in Experiments 1 and 3……………...... 91 vii Table 23. Mean writing difficulty ratings over blocks in Experiments 1 and 3…………... 92 Table 24. Mean topic difficulty ratings over blocks in Experiments 1 and 3……………... 93 Table 25. Mean reading times over blocks in Experiments 1 and 3………………............. 94 Table 26. Correlation coefficients between simple slopes in Experiments 1 and 3……….. 97 Table F1. Mean mind-wandering rates for the first and second halves of passages in Experiments 1 and 3…………………………………………………………… 132 viii List of Figures Figure D1. Mean mind-wandering rates over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)………………………………………. 125 Figure D2. Mean proportion of correctly answered comprehension questions over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)………. 125 Figure D3. Mean writing interest ratings over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)……………………………………..... 126 Figure D4. Mean topic interest ratings over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)………………………………………. 126 Figure D5. Mean writing difficulty ratings over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)………………………………………. 127 Figure D6. Mean topic difficulty ratings over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)………………………………………. 127 Figure D7. Mean reading times over passage block for the pooled sentence presentation data (Experiments 1 and 3)…………………………………………………….. 128 ix Chapter 1 Does objective difficulty affect mind-wandering? Students are all too familiar with the realization that their thoughts have come untethered from their coursework and drifted elsewhere. Such instances of mind-wandering have been found to impair reading comprehension (Franklin, Smallwood, & Schooler, 2011; Feng, D’Mello, & Graesser, 2013; Reichle, Reineberg, & Schooler, 2010; Schooler, Reichle, & Halpern, 2004; Smallwood, Fishman, & Schooler, 2007; Smallwood, McSpadden, & Schooler, 2008; Unsworth & McMillan, 2013). Given that reading comprehension is integral to learning throughout one’s education, it is important for research to elucidate factors that influence mind- wandering while reading. This present work focused on two such factors: difficulty and interest. Reading comprehension is but one of many domains in which mind-wandering is costly (see Mooneyham & Schooler, 2013, for a review). In the laboratory, mind-wandering impairs attention (e.g., Manly, Robertson, Galloway, & Hawkins, 1999; McVay & Kane, 2009; McVay & Kane, 2012a; Seli, Cheyne, & Smilek, 2013; Smallwood, Beach, Schooler, & Handy, 2008; Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, & Yiend, 1997), oddball detection (Barron, Riby, Greer, & Smallwood, 2011), visual search (Thomson, Seli, Besner, Smilek, 2014), and random number generation (Teasdale et al., 1995). Mind-wandering also impairs lecture comprehension (e.g., Risko, Anderson, Sarwal, Engelhardt, &
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Dusty, Normal Galaxy in the Epoch of Reionization
    A dusty, normal galaxy in the epoch of reionization Darach Watson1, Lise Christensen1, Kirsten Kraiberg Knudsen2, Johan Richard3, Anna Gallazzi4,1, and Michał Jerzy Michałowski5 Candidates for the modest galaxies that formed most of the stars in the early universe, at redshifts z > 7, have been found in large numbers with extremely deep restframe-UV imaging1. But it has proved difficult for existing spectrographs to characterise them in the UV2,3,4. The detailed properties of these galaxies could be measured from dust and cool gas emission at far-infrared wavelengths if the galaxies have become sufficiently enriched in dust and metals. So far, however, the most distant UV-selected galaxy detected in dust emission is only at z = 3.25, and recent results have cast doubt on whether dust and molecules can be found in typical galaxies at this early epoch6,7,8. Here we report thermal dust emission from an archetypal early universe star-forming galaxy, A1689-zD1. We detect its stellar continuum in spectroscopy and determine its redshift to be z = 7.5±0.2 from a spectroscopic detection of the Lyα break. A1689-zD1 is representative of the star-forming population during reionisation9, with a total star- –1 formation rate of about 12 M yr . The galaxy is highly evolved: it has a large stellar mass, and is heavily enriched in dust, with a dust-to-gas ratio close to that of the Milky Way. Dusty, evolved galaxies are thus present among the fainter star-forming population at z > 7, in spite of the very short time since they first appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ecclesiastical Cosmology
    GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 101 GSJ: Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2018, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com DEMOLITION HUBBLE'S LAW, BIG BANG THE BASIS OF "MODERN" AND ECCLESIASTICAL COSMOLOGY Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia Pусскй Croatian „If two objects are represented by ball bearings and space-time by the stretching of a rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by the rolling of ball bearings over the rubber sheet in order to achieve a particular motion. A cosmological red shift occurs when ball bearings get stuck on the sheet, which is stretched.“ Wikipedia OK, let's check that on our local group of galaxies (the table from my article „Where did the blue spectral shift inside the universe come from?“) galaxies, local groups Redshift km/s Blueshift km/s Sextans B (4.44 ± 0.23 Mly) 300 ± 0 Sextans A 324 ± 2 NGC 3109 403 ± 1 Tucana Dwarf 130 ± ? Leo I 285 ± 2 NGC 6822 -57 ± 2 Andromeda Galaxy -301 ± 1 Leo II (about 690,000 ly) 79 ± 1 Phoenix Dwarf 60 ± 30 SagDIG -79 ± 1 Aquarius Dwarf -141 ± 2 Wolf–Lundmark–Melotte -122 ± 2 Pisces Dwarf -287 ± 0 Antlia Dwarf 362 ± 0 Leo A 0.000067 (z) Pegasus Dwarf Spheroidal -354 ± 3 IC 10 -348 ± 1 NGC 185 -202 ± 3 Canes Venatici I ~ 31 GSJ© 2018 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 102 Andromeda III -351 ± 9 Andromeda II -188 ± 3 Triangulum Galaxy -179 ± 3 Messier 110 -241 ± 3 NGC 147 (2.53 ± 0.11 Mly) -193 ± 3 Small Magellanic Cloud 0.000527 Large Magellanic Cloud - - M32 -200 ± 6 NGC 205 -241 ± 3 IC 1613 -234 ± 1 Carina Dwarf 230 ± 60 Sextans Dwarf 224 ± 2 Ursa Minor Dwarf (200 ± 30 kly) -247 ± 1 Draco Dwarf -292 ± 21 Cassiopeia Dwarf -307 ± 2 Ursa Major II Dwarf - 116 Leo IV 130 Leo V ( 585 kly) 173 Leo T -60 Bootes II -120 Pegasus Dwarf -183 ± 0 Sculptor Dwarf 110 ± 1 Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Universe Transcript
    The Early Universe Transcript Date: Wednesday, 4 February 2015 - 1:00PM Location: Museum of London 04 February 2015 The Early Universe Professor Carolin Crawford In my previous lectures I have discussed both the earliest glimpse of the Universe available to us, the cosmic microwave background, and the wide variety of astronomical sources that we observe all around us in the present day. Today’s talk is an attempt to join the dots between these two extremes: how do we move from an almost completely smooth distribution of matter when Universe was only 380,000 years old, to the complexity of stars, planets, gas clouds, galaxies and even larger scale structure? Galaxies don’t just simply appear shortly after the Big Bang, but they take tens of millions of years (at least) to form; and then they continue to change and evolve. Today’s topic is observational cosmology – the study of the most remote parts of the cosmos. This is a major growth area in astrophysics, where huge advances in our understanding have been made over the last 15-20 years, primarily due to cutting-edge advances in the design of the telescopes and their adaptive optics. What was this very early Universe like? What happened after the release of the cosmic microwave background light? What did the very first stars and the first galaxies look like? And what do they tell us about the history of galaxies like our own? Recombination Immediately after the Big Bang, the Universe was extremely hot and dense. After 380,000 years, it had expanded and cooled sufficiently for the elementary particles to join together and form the very first atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2009.10092V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 3 Dec 2020
    DRAFT VERSION DECEMBER 4, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Texas Spectroscopic Search for Lyα Emission at the End of Reionization. III. the Lyα Equivalent-width Distribution and Ionized Structures at z > 7 INTAE JUNG,1, 2, 3, 4 STEVEN L. FINKELSTEIN,4 MARK DICKINSON,5 TAYLOR A. HUTCHISON,6, 7 REBECCA L. LARSON,4 CASEY PAPOVICH,6, 7 LAURA PENTERICCI,8 AMBER N. STRAUGHN,1 YICHENG GUO,9 SANGEETA MALHOTRA,1, 10 JAMES RHOADS,1, 10 MIMI SONG,11 VITHAL TILVI,10 AND ISAK WOLD1 1Astrophysics Science Division, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 2Department of Physics, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA 3Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science and Technology, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771 4Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA 5NSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4242 USA 7George P. and Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4242 USA 8INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, 00078, Monteporzio Catone, Italy 9Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA 10School of Earth & Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA 11Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002, USA (Published 2020 November 27 in ApJ) ABSTRACT Lyα emission from galaxies can be utilized to characterize the ionization state in the intergalactic medium (IGM). We report our search for Lyα emission at z > 7 using a comprehensive Keck/MOSFIRE near-infrared spectroscopic dataset, as part of the Texas Spectroscopic Search for Lyα Emission at the End of Reionization Survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Rotation Arund the Axis on the Stars, Galaxy and Rotation of Universe* Weitter Duckss1
    Effects of Rotation Arund the Axis on the Stars, Galaxy and Rotation of Universe* Weitter Duckss1 1Independent Researcher, Zadar, Croatia *Project: https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html; (https://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/) Abstract: The article analyzes the blueshift of the objects, through realized measurements of galaxies, mergers and collisions of galaxies and clusters of galaxies and measurements of different galactic speeds, where the closer galaxies move faster than the significantly more distant ones. The clusters of galaxies are analyzed through their non-zero value rotations and gravitational connection of objects inside a cluster, supercluster or a group of galaxies. The constant growth of objects and systems is visible through the constant influx of space material to Earth and other objects inside our system, through percussive craters, scattered around the system, collisions and mergers of objects, galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Atom and its formation, joining into pairs, growth and disintegration are analyzed through atoms of the same values of structure, different aggregate states and contiguous atoms of different aggregate states. The disintegration of complex atoms is followed with the temperature increase above the boiling point of atoms and compounds. The effects of rotation around an axis are analyzed from the small objects through stars, galaxies, superclusters and to the rotation of Universe. The objects' speeds of rotation and their effects are analyzed through the formation and appearance of a system (the formation of orbits, the asteroid belt, gas disk, the appearance of galaxies), its influence on temperature, surface gravity, the force of a magnetic field, the size of a radius.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the Spitzer/IRAC Colours of 7 ≤ Z ≤ 9 Galaxies: Distinguishing Between Line Emission and Starlight Using ALMA
    MNRAS 497, 3440–3450 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2085 Advance Access publication 2020 July 16 Interpreting the Spitzer/IRAC colours of 7 ≤ z ≤ 9 galaxies: distinguishing between line emission and starlight using ALMA G. W. Roberts-Borsani ,1,2‹ R. S. Ellis2 and N. Laporte3,4,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, 430 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK 3Kavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 4 Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 19 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/497/3/3440/5872501 by UCL, London user on 09 December 2020 Accepted 2020 July 13. Received 2020 June 30; in original form 2020 January 7 ABSTRACT Prior to the launch of JWST, Spitzer/IRAC photometry offers the only means of studying the rest-frame optical properties of z >7 galaxies. Many such high-redshift galaxies display a red [3.6]−[4.5] micron colour, often referred to as the ‘IRAC excess’, which has conventionally been interpreted as arising from intense [O III]+H β emission within the [4.5] micron bandpass. An appealing aspect of this interpretation is similarly intense line emission seen in star-forming galaxies at lower redshift as well as the redshift-dependent behaviour of the IRAC colours beyond z ∼ 7 modelled as the various nebular lines move through the two bandpasses. In this paper, we demonstrate that, given the photometric uncertainties, established stellar populations with Balmer (4000 Å rest frame) breaks, such as those inferred at z>9 where line emission does not contaminate the IRAC bands, can equally well explain the redshift-dependent behaviour of the IRAC colours in 7 z 9 galaxies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Illustration by JE Mullat the BIG BANG and the BIG CRUNCH
    Cover Illustration by J. E. Mullat THE BIG BANG AND THE BIG CRUNCH From Public Domain: designed by Luke Mastin OBSERVATIONS THAT SEEM TO CONTRADICT THE BIG BANG MODEL WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SUPPORT AN ALTERNATIVE COSMOLOGY Forrest W. Noble, Timothy M. Cooper The Pantheory Research Organization Cerritos, California 90703 USA HUBBLE-INDEPENDENT PROCEDURE CALCULATING DISTANCES TO COSMOLOGICAL OBJECTS Joseph E. Mullat Project and Technical Editor: J. E. Mullat, Copenhagen 2019 ISBN‐13 978‐8740‐40‐411‐1 Private Publishing Platform Byvej 269 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark [email protected] The Postulate COSMOLOGY THAT CONTRADICTS THE BIG BANG THEORY The Standard and The Alternative Cosmological Models, Distances Calculation to Galaxies without Hubble Constant For the alternative cosmological models discussed in the book, distances are calculated for galaxies without using the Hubble constant. This proc‐ ess is mentioned in the second narrative and is described in detail in the third narrative. According to the third narrative, when the energy den‐ sity of space in the universe decreases, and the universe expands, a new space is created by a gravitational transition from dark energy. Although the Universe develops on the basis of this postulate about the appear‐ ance of a new space, it is assumed that matter arises as a result of such a gravitational transition into both new dark space and visible / baryonic matter. It is somewhat unimportant how we describe dark energy, call‐ ing it ether, gravitons, or vice versa, turning ether into dark energy. It should be clear to everyone that this renaming does not change the es‐ sence of this gravitational transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    The Processes of Violent Disintegration and Natural Creation of Matter in the Universe Weitter Duckss Independent Researcher, Zadar, Croatia [email protected] Abstract: This article completes the circle of presenting the process of the constant growth of objects and systems and the topics to complete it consist of the visible matter violent disintegration and its re-creation inside the Universe. A constant process of the visible matter disintegration is presented as the end of the process, the proportions of which are gigantic, and the creation of the visible matter as the beginning of it. The disintegration of particles disturbs the balance of the Universe's wholeness; despite the enormous loss of the visible matter, the Universe is constantly growing. After having postponed it for a while, this article discusses the age of objects and the Universe as a consequence of the process of the constant matter growth. The acquired results are completely different from those, offered by the renowned experts of the time. Keywords: disintegration of matter; particle formation; the age of the Universe I. Introduction The goal of the article is to unite the total processes of the constant matter growth inside the Universe, based on the independent research, the use of databases of generally accepted, easily verifiable evidence for the broadest community of readers. This article is a summary of the materials inside the process of the constant matter gathering, with the articles (Yukawa, 1935), (Duckss, 2019), (Duckss, 2018), and (Duckss, 2018) due to gravity or the law of universal gravitation. The disintegration of matter is a process of turning the visible matter into the invisible matter and energy and it exists in the whole of the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Constraints on UV Attenuation, Dust- Obscured Star Formation, and Dust Mass of Z=6.5-7.5 Galaxies
    Direct constraints on UV attenuation, dust- obscured star formation, and dust mass of z=6.5-7.5 galaxies! Daniel Schaerer (Geneva Observatory, CNRS)! Fréderic Boone (IRAP, Toulouse)! Other collaborators: M. Zamojski, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky, J. Staguhn, S. Finkelstein, F. Combes! ! • Introduction, motivation! • New constraints on z>6 star-forming galaxies! • Conclusions! Schaerer et al. 2014, A&A in press; arXiv:1407.5793! de Barros, Schaerer, Stark, 2014, A&A 563, A81! Schaerer & de Barros 2014, in prep! from the ratio of FIR to observed (uncorrected) FUV luminosity densities (Figure 8) as a function of redshift, using FUVLFs from Cucciati et al. (2012) and Herschel FIRLFs from Gruppioni et al. (2013). At z<2, these estimates agree reasonably well with the measure- ments inferred from the UV slope or from SED fitting. At z>2, the FIR/FUV estimates have large uncertainties owing to the similarly large uncertainties required to extrapolate the observed FIRLF to a total luminosity density. The values are larger than those for the UV-selected surveys, particularly when compared with the UV values extrapolated to very faint luminosities. Although galaxies with lower SFRs may have reduced extinction, purely UV-selected samples at high redshift may also be biased against dusty star-forming galaxies. As we noted above, a robust census for star-forminggalaxiesatz ! 2selected on the basis of dust emission alone does not exist, owing to thesensitivitylimitsofpast and present FIR and submillimeter observatories. Accordingly, the total amount of star formation that is missed from UV surveys at such high redshifts remains uncertain. Introduction! Cosmic star formation rate history! ! review of Madau & Dickinson (2014)! Figure 9: The history of cosmic star formation from (top right panel) FUV, (bottom right panel) IR, Majorand (left unknowns panel) FUV+IR rest-frame: ! measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Galaxy Formation and Its Large-Scale Effects
    Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects Pratika Dayal1 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Landleven 12, Groningen, 9717 AD, The Netherlands Andrea Ferrara2 Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, Pisa, 56126, Italy Abstract Galaxy formation is at the heart of our understanding of cosmic evolution. Although there is a consensus that galaxies emerged from the expanding matter background by gravitational instability of primordial fluctuations, a number of additional physical processes must be understood and implemented in theoretical models before these can be reliably used to interpret observations. In parallel, the astonishing recent progresses made in detecting galaxies that formed only a few hundreds of million years after the Big Bang is pushing the quest for more sophisticated and detailed studies of early structures. In this review, we combine the information gleaned from different theoretical models/studies to build a coherent picture of the Universe in its early stages which includes the physics of galaxy formation along with the impact that early structures had on large-scale processes as cosmic reionization and metal enrichment of the intergalactic medium. Keywords: High-redshift - intergalactic medium - galaxy formation - first stars - reionization - cosmology:theory Contents 1 Galaxy formation: a brief historical perspective 6 2 Cosmic evolution in a nutshell 12 3 The cosmic scaffolding: dark matter halos 16 arXiv:1809.09136v2 [astro-ph.GA] 23 Nov 2018 3.1 The standard cosmological model . 16 3.2 The start: linear perturbation theory . 19 3.3 Nonlinear collapse and hierarchical assembly of dark matter halos . 20 4 Basic physics of galaxy formation 26 4.1 Physical ingredients .
    [Show full text]
  • New Constraints on Dust Emission and UV Attenuation of Z = 6.5–7.5 Galaxies from Millimeter Observations
    A&A 574, A19 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424649 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics New constraints on dust emission and UV attenuation of z = 6.5–7.5 galaxies from millimeter observations D. Schaerer1,2, F. Boone2, M. Zamojski1, J. Staguhn3,4, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky1 , S. Finkelstein5,andF.Combes6 1 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] 2 CNRS, IRAP, 14 avenue É. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 3 The Henry A. Rowland Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, MD 21218, Baltimore, USA 4 Observational Cosmology Lab., Code 665, NASA at Goddard Space Flight Center, MD 20771, Greenbelt, USA 5 The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA 6 Observatoire de Paris, LERMA, 61 Av. de l’Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France Received 21 July 2014 / Accepted 3 November 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Determining the dust properties and UV attenuation of distant star-forming galaxies is of great interest for our understanding of galaxy formation and cosmic star formation in the early Universe. However, few direct measurements exist so far. Aims. To shed new light on these questions, we have targeted two recently discovered Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) at z ≈ 6.8and z = 7.508 to search for dust continuum and [C ii] λ158 μm line emission. Methods. The strongly lensed z ≈ 6.8 LBG A1703-zD1 behind the galaxy cluster Abell 1703 and the spectroscopically confirmed z = 7.508 LBG z8-GND-5296 in the GOODS-N field were observed with the Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI) at 1.2 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Système Solaire Au Delà Du Système Solaire
    LeLe SystèmeSystème solairesolaire Le système solaire (Naissance, vie et mort des étoiles, Soleil, planètes, astéroïdes, planètes naines, ceinture de Kuiper, comètes, nuage d’Oort) Au delà du système solaire (Voie Lactée, exoplanètes, galaxies, groupes de galaxies, trous noirs, Big Bang, Univers) GAP 47 • Olivier Sabbagh • Janvier 2015 Le Système solaire, la Galaxie, l’Univers I Introduction AVERTISSEMENT AUX LECTEURS : Ce document étudie tous les aspects du système solaire et, bien au-delà, replace cet ensemble dans notre Galaxie, celle-ci dans les groupes de galaxies, puis le tout dans l’univers. Nous évoquerons aussi quelques notions sur les trous noirs et le « Big Bang ». Par contre les informations concernant les planètes seront évoquées assez sommairement dans la mesure où sont déjà rédigés des textes spécifiques sur chacune des planètes : Mercure, Vénus la Terre, Mars, Jupiter, Saturne, Uranus, Neptune, les planètes naines, ainsi que les Instruments de l’Astronomie et la Conquête spatiale. A) Naissance d’une étoile – Présence d’une nébuleuse La naissance des étoiles ou formation stellaire, voire stellogénèse ou stellogonie, est un domaine de recherche en astrophysique qui consiste en l'étude des modes de formation des étoiles et des systèmes planétaires. Les étoiles en formation sont fréquemment appelées "étoiles jeunes". En cosmologie, la formation des étoiles n’a lieu que durant la période de l’univers nommée « ère stellifère ». Selon le scénario actuellement admis, confirmé par l'observation, les étoiles se forment en groupe à partir de la contraction gravitationnelle d'une nébuleuse, un nuage de gaz et de poussière, qui se fragmente en plusieurs cœurs protostellaires.
    [Show full text]