DOCSLIB.ORG

RULES BOOK Civil War and the Gilded

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RULES BOOK Civil War and the Gilded FoundingCivil War and Fathersthe Gilded Age by Rick Heli Rules Book Version 1.1 – May 2019 Introduction 1 The Treasury 7 Activating the Expansion 2 The Election 7 General Setup 3 The People 9 Card Changes 4 Variable Outcomes Optional Rule 10 Player Notes 6 Scenarios 10 Rules Changes 7 Design Notes 14 The Issues 7 Appendix 15 INTRODUCTION Founding Fathers: Civil War and the Gilded Age expands the original game to the era 1861-1917, including the American Civil War and continuing up to the American entry into the Great War. Play as a continuation of the original game, use Scenario D to begin in the Civil War era or try Scenario F for the Gilded Age. New features include a new way of electing the President, new Statesman abilities and, of course, a whole new host of Issues, Statesmen and Actions. In addition, there are new Generation II and III Statesmen you can also add to the original game as well as Variable Outcome optional cards. Important Note: This is an expansion kit for the Founding Fathers board game, which you need to use this product. It is fully compatible with the Founding Fathers: Offices & Statesman and Founding Fathers: Ladies & Orators expansions. COMPONENTS Each game includes the following: ✔ 1 18x18" mounted board ✔ 10 Congress houses ✔ 30 player disks (5 each in six colors) ✔ 10 large Popularity cubes ✔ 3 5x10" mounted player mats (President's Agenda on reverse) ✔ this Rules Booklet ✔ 198 game cards*: ✗ 75 Issues: 4 Era B, 5 Era C, 8 Era D, 19 Era E, 13 Era F, 15 Era G, 11 Era H ✗ 102 Actions: 1 Generation II Statesman, 16 Generation III (15 Statesmen), 26 Generation IV (11 Statesmen), 27 Generation V (15 Statesmen), 22 Generation VI (14 Statesmen), 10 Generation VII (9 Statesmen) ✗ 11 Variable Outcomes and 10 Presidential (1 Original State, 5 Admitted States, 2 Offices, 2 Initiatives) * The symbol that appears on all this expansion's cards distinguishes them from the cards of the base game and prior expansions. Important Note If you plan to start with a base game scenario and continue into the expansion eras, before starting the base game, be sure to add the Generation II and III Action Cards and the Era B Issue Card from this expansion to the appropriate decks. You can use these even if you are playing only the first three eras, but they are especially important to include if you plan to play into Era D and beyond. In addition, replace the base game New England State card with the one from this set. – 1 – Activating the expansion You can bring the expansion to the table either as a Generation III: continuation of the base game (except the Historical ● 1 Dred Scott Decision Factions variant) or standalone, although all of these ● 1 Jessie Benton (but only if not in play) approaches need some cards and markers from the base ● 1 New York City Draft Riots game: ● 1 Raid on Harpers Ferry ● Your playing of the base game sees Tension reach After Era C, read references to Liberal as Civil War. Republican and Conservative as Democratic on ● You exhaust the Issues deck in Era C. such cards. ● To play either of the expansion scenarios from 8. Re-shuffle the Action Deck. scratch. 9. In clockwise order, beginning with the President If playing an expansion scenario, see the General Setup and player, each player draws a replacement Action for specific scenario setup information below. each card lost in (7) 10. (optional) To save space you can pick up the map cards and place them in the Resolved Issues box. Continuing the Base Game You no longer need them to resolve Elections. 11. Decide whether to play to the end of Era E or through Era H. Set up a transition from the base game as follows: 12. In case of Civil War. If Tension reaches Civil War, 1. Record Victory Points for all players and the value the next Issue is automatically Initiating Civil War of the Tension Track marker. (D) (even if the triggering Action was the Hartford 2. Remove all decks and discard piles from the board Convention). The Issues deck consists of only the to a nearby place. Era D Issue Cards. Shuffle any Issues remaining 3. Remove all Tax, Tariff and Emergency Bond cards from Eras A-C into the Era E deck. and the base game player aides from play. 13. No Civil War. If you ended Era C without 4. Return all board markers to the supply. triggering Civil War, shuffle any remaining Issue Cards together with the Era D Issue Cards – omit 5. Replace the base game board with the expansion Initiating Civil War – and continue play. If board. Tension later reaches Civil War, retrieve Initiating 6. Place player disks on the VPs track and a yellow Civil War and make it the current Issue. cube on the Tension Track to reflect the values To complete setup continue with General Setup. recorded in (1). 7. Remove from play all Action Cards of earlier Generations you find in the deck and players' hands – repeat when you enter Generations II, III and IV – except: Generation I: ● 5 Coalition Building ● 5 Make an Important Speech Generation II: ● 1 Secession ● 1 Theory of Nullification Applied ● 1 Ugly Words (from the Founding Fathers: Roscoe Conkling plays at a puzzle with candidates including Offices & Statesman expansion) Grant, Sherman, Tilden, and Blaine (whose head is in his hand). – 2 – GENERAL SETUP Follow these instructions both when transitioning from the base game or when playing an expansion scenario. 1. In the Situations section of the Election Table on the board, place a purple cube on each false in the Incumbent column If the value of any of these changes to true, simply slide the cube over. 2. Place five yellow cubes near the Candidates section of the 7 8 Election Table on the board for future use. 3. Place a yellow cube in the status box for each of the following: ● Civil War?: Place a marker on active if you have triggered the Civil War and not yet resolved it. 6 ● South Separated: true if you achieved a South Separated result. ● Gold Standard: true if you resolved this Issue. ● South Wins: true if you achieved a South Wins result. 4. Place an orange cube on the 0 box of the Great War track. 5. Place the Issue, Resolved Issue, Action, and Action discard decks in the corresponding board spaces. 1 6. For each player, add to their Victory Points number their Popularity points on cards and record this number with player disks on the Potential VPs track. Update this track just before each Card Drafting phase and use it to determine the drafting order. 7. Total up each player's votes in Congress and use two of their disks to record it on the Votes in Congress track. Update these counts at any time, but especially before each Election. 8. Count Party Votes. Count the votes in Congress of each in-play Statesman in the Democratic Party and mark this on the Votes in Congress track with a blue cube. Do the same for 4 the Republicans, marking the total with an orange cube. (See Appendix to discover the Parties of the older politicians.) Track changes to these totals as new Statesmen enter and leave play as well as gain or lose Congressional Support. You need these totals to resolve the Election. 9. Party Leaders. Assign the orange Party Leader pawn to the Republican Statesman with the most Popularity and the blue Party Leader pawn to the most popular Democratic Statesman. As usual, break ties in favor of the older Statesman. 10. Place the house markers, the Initiative cards and the Special Envoy Office card in some prominent place, such as the logo. 11. Distribute the play aides. 12. If playing Scenario F, ignore the Tension Track. 13. Read Card Changes and Rules Changes to understand how play changes in Eras D-H. – 3 – Card Changes Eras and generations This expansion includes Issue Cards for Eras D-H. As in the base game, when exhausting the Issues deck, shuffle any pending Issues with the next lettered deck. Similarly, this expansion includes Statesmen and Action Cards for Generations IV-VI. As in the base game, when exhausting the Action deck, shuffle the Action with the next numbered deck. 5 Parties Rather than Liberal and Conservative, beginning with Era D, Statesmen belong to the Democratic or Republican Parties. Republicans are red, Democrats blue. Many older Statesmen show a blue D to indicate a Democrat or an R to indicate a 2 Republican. For those that lack Party designations, discover the Party in the Appendix and indicate the it by placing a blue cube on each Democrat and an orange cube on each Republican. Offices Admiral The revelation of the first Issue Card to name this Office creates it, automatically. You can only assign it to a Statesman having Military Ability and, unlike other Offices, only when the President makes it a Responsible Officer for an active Issue that 3 5 requires it. Like the General, you can change the Admiral when the new appointee has higher Ability or the holder is not of the President's Party. If no Statesman qualifies for the Office, all Statesmen other than the President and Vice President are eligible until one does qualify. If all such Statesmen are already holding an Office, the President decides which of them must take this Office instead. In the unusual event that at the start of The Issues a Statesman is 5 5 serving as both Admiral and General, they must resign one of these Offices at that time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SHERMAN (WILLIAM T.) LETTERS (Mss
    SHERMAN (WILLIAM T.) LETTERS (Mss. 1688) Inventory Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Valley Collections Special Collections, Hill Memorial Library Louisiana State University Libraries Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Reformatted 2003 Revised 2011 SHERMAN (WILLIAM T.) LETTERS Mss. 1688 1863-1905 LSU Libraries Special Collections CONTENTS OF INVENTORY SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL NOTE ...................................................................................... 4 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ................................................................................................... 4 CROSS REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 5 CONTAINER LIST ........................................................................................................................ 6 Use of manuscript materials. If you wish to examine items in the manuscript group, please fill out a call slip specifying the materials you wish to see. Consult the Container List for location information needed on the call slip. Photocopying. If you wish to request photocopies, please consult a staff member. The existing order and arrangement of unbound materials must be maintained. Publication. Readers assume full responsibility for compliance with laws regarding copyright, literary property rights, and libel. Permission to examine archival
    [Show full text]
  • Election Division Presidential Electors Faqs and Roster of Electors, 1816
    Election Division Presidential Electors FAQ Q1: How many presidential electors does Indiana have? What determines this number? Indiana currently has 11 presidential electors. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that each state shall appoint a number of electors equal to the number of Senators or Representatives to which the state is entitled in Congress. Since Indiana has currently has 9 U.S. Representatives and 2 U.S. Senators, the state is entitled to 11 electors. Q2: What are the requirements to serve as a presidential elector in Indiana? The requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 provides that "no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment also states that "No person shall be... elector of President or Vice-President... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Congress may be a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." These requirements are included in state law at Indiana Code 3-8-1-6(b). Q3: How does a person become a candidate to be chosen as a presidential elector in Indiana? Three political parties (Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican) have their presidential and vice- presidential candidates placed on Indiana ballots after their party's national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Comes East: a Novel of the Civil War
    Civil War Book Review Winter 2005 Article 41 Grant Comes East: A Novel of the Civil War Thomas Hill Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Hill, Thomas (2005) "Grant Comes East: A Novel of the Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol7/iss1/41 Hill: Grant Comes East: A Novel of the Civil War Review Hill, Thomas Winter 2005 Gingrich, Newt and Forstchen, William R. Grant Comes East: A Novel of the Civil War. Thomas Dunne Books, $24.95 ISBN 312309376 Alternative account Authors produce their second what-if story What if the South had won the Battle of Gettysburg? This is the question addressed in Newt Gingrich and William R. Forstchen's Grant Comes East, the follow-up to their imaginatively entitled Gettysburg, in which Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia did indeed outmaneuver and defeat the Army of the Potomac at their critical clash in July of 1863. The backgrounds of both authors render them well-suited to speculating as to the military strategy and political wrangling that may have followed such a turn of events. In addition to being a former Speaker of the House, Gingrich holds a Ph.D. in history, is a visiting professor at the National Defense University, and serves as a member of Donald Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board. Forstchen, the more experienced author with over 30 previous books, is an associate professor of history at Montreat College. The novel opens with Ulysses S.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Company of Philadelphia Mca 5792.F CIVIL WAR LEADERS
    Library Company of Philadelphia McA 5792.F CIVIL WAR LEADERS EPHEMERA COLLECTION 1860‐1865 1.88 linear feet, 2 boxes Series I. Small Ephemera, 1860‐1865 Series II. Oversize Material, 1860s March 2006 McA MSS 004 2 Descriptive Summary Repository Library Company of Philadelphia 1314 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107‐5698 Call Number McA 5792.F Creator McAllister, John A. (John Allister), 1822‐1896. Title Civil War Leaders Ephemera Collection Inclusive Dates 1860‐1865 Quantity 1.88 linear feet (2 boxes) Language of Materials Materials are in English. Abstract The Civil War Leaders Ephemera Collection holds ephemera and visual materials related to a group of prominent American politicians and military heroes active in the middle of the nineteenth century: Robert Anderson, William G. Brownlow, Jefferson Davis, Abraham Lincoln, George B. McClellan, and Winfield Scott. Administrative Information Restrictions to Access The collection is open to researchers. Acquisition Information Gift of John A. McAllister; forms part of the McAllister Collection. Processing Information The Civil War Leaders Ephemera Collection was formerly housed in four folio albums that had been created after the McAllister Collection arrived at the Library Company. The material was removed from the albums, arranged, and described in 2006, under grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the William Penn Foundation. The collection was processed by Sandra Markham. Any views, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this finding aid do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities. Preferred Citation This collection should be cited as: [indicate specific item or series here], Civil War Leaders Ephemera Collection (McA 5792.F), McAllister Collection, The Library Company of Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • “Mcconnell Majorities” in Supreme Court Decision-Making
    PRESIDENT-SHOPPING FOR A NEW SCALIA: THE ILLEGITIMACY OF “MCCONNELL MAJORITIES” IN SUPREME COURT DECISION-MAKING J. Stephen Clark* WASHINGTON, June 29—By the slimmest of margins, the Supreme Court today ended its decades of protecting abortion rights and overruled Roe v. Wade,1 the 1973 decision that established abortion as a constitutional right.2 The breaking news one day in June 2019 is the demise of Roe v. Wade. By a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court has overruled the precedent and left the protection of abortion rights to the sole discretion of lawmakers. There had been no majority for such a decision until President Trump had the chance to make two appointments to the Court. One of those appointees wrote the majority opinion. Perhaps fittingly, the author of the opinion was the successor to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who strove for this goal more vigorously than any member of the Court since 1973. Of course, every supporter of abortion rights realizes that the Trump appointee now sits on the High Court only because President Obama’s nominee for the same seat was ignored by the Senate for eleven months. The overruling of Roe is directly traceable to that stonewalling and its mastermind—the majority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. Why should supporters of abortion rights accept the legitimacy of a Court decision handed down by a bare majority that owes its fifth vote to Mitch McConnell’s Supreme Court Justice? The answer is that they would not, nor should they. Contrary to McConnell’s repeated claims, his posture of determined inaction * Professor of Law, Albany Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Starry Banner: a Novel of the Civil War
    Civil War Book Review Summer 2004 Article 14 Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War John Benson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Benson, John (2004) "Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 6 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol6/iss3/14 Benson: Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War Review Benson, John Summer 2004 Carter, Alden R. Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War. Soho Press, Inc., $27.00 ISBN 1569473552 Way out west Battle of Stone's River retold Civil War history and fiction are rarely combined with any success. Alden R. Carter, attempts to venture where few have triumphed in Bright and Starry Banner and meets the same fate as countless other authors. Set in the shadows of the Stones River Campaign, Carter takes the reader into the minds of the Union and Confederate leaders who fought for victory in the west. Carter's principle character is Lieutenant Colonel Julius Garesche, the 41 year old chief of staff of the Union Army of the Cumberland, who begins the story with reluctant hopes as he begins service on the staff of Major General William S. Rosecrans, the army's newly appointed leader. Gradually we follow Garesche as he bears witness to a seesaw battle that develops into a stalemate, and with it, the continuing struggle. The Battle of Stones River, was fought around the Widow Smith House in Murfreesboro Tennessee from December 31, 1862 to January 2, 1863.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • (July-November 1863) Lincoln's Popularit
    Chapter Thirty-one “The Signs Look Better”: Victory at the Polls and in the Field (July-November 1863) Lincoln’s popularity soared after the victories at Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Port Hudson. His old friend from Illinois, Jesse W. Fell, reflected the changed public mood. In August, Fell told Lyman Trumbull that during the early stages of the war, “I did not like some things that were done, and many things that were not done, by the present Administration.” Along with most “earnest, loyal men, I too was a grumbler, because, as we thought, the Gov't. moved too slow.” But looking back, Fell acknowledged that “we are not now disposed to be sensorious [sic] to the ‘powers that be,’ even among ourselves.” To the contrary, “it is now pretty generally conceded, that, all things considered, Mr. Lincoln's Administration has done well.” Such “is the general sentiment out of Copperhead Circles.” Lincoln had been tried, and it was clear “that he is both honest and patriotic; that if he don't go forward as fast as some of us like, he never goes backwards.”1 To a friend in Europe, George D. Morgan explained that the president “is very popular and good men of all sides seem to regard him as the man for the place, for they see what one cannot see abroad, how difficult the position he has to fill, to keep 1 Fell to Lyman Trumbull, Cincinnati, 11 August 1863, Trumbull Papers, Library of Congress. 3378 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 31 the border States quiet, to keep peace with the different generals, and give any satisfaction to the radicals.”2 One of those Radicals, Franklin B.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War 150 Reader 4
    CIVIL WAR 150 • READER #4 Contents From SLAVERY to FREEDOM Introduction by Thavolia Glymph . 3 Introduction by Thavolia Glymph Benjamin F. Butler to Winfield Scott, May 24 , 1861 . 6 Abraham Lincoln to Orville H. Browning, September 22 , 1861 . 9 Let My People Go, December 21 , 1861 . 12 Frederick Douglass: What Shall be Done with the Slaves If Emancipated? January 1862 . 16 John Boston to Elizabeth Boston, January 12 , 1862 . 21 George E. Stephens to the Weekly Anglo-African, March 2, 1862 . 23 Garland H. White to Edwin M. Stanton, May 7, 1862 . 28 Memorial of a Committee of Citizens of Liberty County, Georgia, August 5, 1862 . 30 Harriet Jacobs to William Lloyd Garrison, September 5, 1862 . 36 Abraham Lincoln: Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, CIVIL WAR 372: Exploring the War and Its September 22 , 1862 . 45 Meaning Through the Words of Those Who Lived It Debate in the Confederate Senate on Retaliation for is a national public programing initiative designed to encourage the Emancipation Proclamation, September 29 , October 1, 1862 . 49 public exploration of the transformative impact and contested meanings of the Civil War through primary documents and firsthand accounts. Samuel Sawyer, Pearl P. Ingalls, and Jacob G. Forman to Samuel R. Curtis, December 29 , 1862 . 54 Abraham Lincoln: Final Emancipation Proclamation, The project is presented by January 1, 1863 . 56 The Library of America Biographical Notes . 59 Chronology . 64 in partnership with Questions for Discussion . 67 and is supported by a grant from Introduction Introduction, headnotes, and back matter copyright © 2012 by Literary Classics of the United States, Inc., New York, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Oooo: DEDICATED to ALL BARRICKMAN-BARRACKMANS WHO HAVE TAKEN SUCH PRIDE in the PART THEIR FAMILY HAS PLAYED in AMERICAN HISTORY
    • JUL * 1^)2 INDEXED G. 3M THE BARRACKMAN-BARRICKMAN FAMILIES OF WEST VIRGINIA COMPILED BY: JUHB Bo BAREKMAN 3302 IV. DIVERSE* CHICAGO 47, ILL. BR 8-8486 GENEALOGICAL SOOSTY OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SANTS R5288 DATE MICROFICHED US/MM / PROJECT and G. S. FlCHE # CALL# 26 frt 7-/0J •4 ioit oooo: DEDICATED TO ALL BARRICKMAN-BARRACKMANS WHO HAVE TAKEN SUCH PRIDE IN THE PART THEIR FAMILY HAS PLAYED IN AMERICAN HISTORY. NOT ONLY THIS FAMILY IN WEST VIRGINIA, BUT IN EARLY VIRGINIA,, MARYLAND, PENNSYL* VANIA, AND EVERY OUTPOST OF CIVILIZATION IN THE AMERICAN COLONIES. THEY WERE HARD WORKING—DEEPLY RELIGIOUS—JUST AND PAIR. THEY WERE TILLERS OF THE SOIL, MEN WHO FOUGHT IN ALL OP OUR WARS TO AID IN FREEDOM. TODAY BARRICKMAN-BARRACKMANS SERVE THROUGH­ OUT THE WORLD AS MINISTERS, COMMANDING OFFICERS IN THE VARIOUS SERVICES, DOCTORS, LAWYERS, EDUCATORS, AND HOMEMAKERS. MANY STILL ARE FARMERS. ALL INTER* ESTED IN ONE COMMON CAUSE—FREEDOM,, IN EVERY MEANING OF THE WORD. MAY THIS GREAT FAMILY GROW AND PROSPERo >CG2 Credits Given *% To Ruth Barekman of Bloomington^ Illinois® who not only diligently typed most of the following records,, but helped In filling In family groups o To Mary T« Rafterye who helped me assemble material© handled some of my correspondence^, and also faithfully typed on the West Virginia llne0 To Marian Collore who supplied all paper materials and ditto mater­ ial sP and ran off one-hundred eoples of the West Virginia booko To DeCota Barrlekman VarnadoP who worked so hard and long on her branch of the West Virginia Barrlokmanso Mrso Varnado spent untold hours of research and letter writing, not to mention long distance oallso Mrso Varnado Is given full credit as the oompllor of the John So Barrlekman familyo To Earl Lo Core.
    [Show full text]