A RELIQUARY CROSS from NORTHWEST ANATOLIA: Reflections on Mortuary Practice, Literacy, and Spelling Variants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A RELIQUARY CROSS from NORTHWEST ANATOLIA: Reflections on Mortuary Practice, Literacy, and Spelling Variants Anatolica XLII, 2016 A RELIQUARY CROSS FROM NORTHWEST ANATOLIA: Reflections on Mortuary Practice, Literacy, and Spelling Variants Tasha Vorderstrasse* Abstract This paper will examine a Middle Byzantine reliquary cross found in a cemetery at Barcın in the western Marmara region and try to examine the significance of reliquary crosses in their archaeological and linguistic contexts. Byzantine reliquary crosses represent an important aspect of the material culture of the medieval period, not simply in the Byzantine world, but also in the lands beyond its borders, where such reliquary crosses were viewed as a desirable luxury object. Despite their clear importance within and without Byzantine culture, however, reliquary crosses have received less attention than one might expect. Further, they are generally not analyzed except as objects denoting the spread of Byzantine culture amongst its neighbors or as signs of a Christian population in an archaeological record otherwise devoid of such signs of religious affiliation. Introduction The reliquary cross under discussion here is made from bronze and reliquary crosses of this type have been discussed thoroughly by Pitarakis (2006a). Her study, although com- prehensive, is not exhaustive and there are various aspects of reliquary crosses that she does not discuss. In particular, she does not address the issue of the inscriptions on the crosses, except to note when they are particularly “retrograde.” Therefore, the significance of the small inscriptions on this and other crosses for Byzantine literacy and spelling variants has not been addressed. She is not alone in her lack of treatment of these short inscriptions, however. Byz- antine literacy remains an understudied topic in general and the significance of short inscrip- tions on objects such as reliquary crosses for the study of literacy has remained unexplored. This article argues that further study of short inscriptions such as these can provide us with insights into the use of these objects in funerary contexts and the literacy of the low level elites in Asia Minor. The reliquary cross from Barcın is not a unique small find, rather it is a good representative of crosses found throughout Anatolia and therefore can be said to be typical of certain types of inscribed jewelry which were used amongst the Middle Byzantine population. This article will begin by discussing the site of Barcın in the Middle Byzantine pe- riod and examining its cemetery, which has one particularly interesting feature, a skull pit. * The author would like to thank J.J. Roodenberg for granting permission to publish the cross from Barcın. This paper was presented to the Late Antique and Byzantine Studies Workshop at the University of Chicago and thanks are also due to the members of the audience and their feedback on the ideas outlined here, as well as to Brian Muhs, Lynn Welton, and Kristine Larison with whom certain aspects of this paper were discussed. I would also like to thank Sophie Moore for providing me with a copy of the Korsvoll Honors Thesis. 172 Tasha Vorderstrasse Although the reliquary cross was found next to an inhumation grave and not the skull pit itself, determining how the cemetery functioned remains problematic and has interesting im- plications for Byzantine mortuary practice. The reliquary cross will then be discussed with its short inscription before turning to a discussion of Byzantine literacy and spelling variants. It concludes with several suggestions for future research on burial practices and the use of short texts to provide us with information about literacy. Middle Byzantine Barcın The site of Barcın is located in northwest Anatolia in the Marmara region in what is now Turkey (Fig. 1). The major cities in this region during the Byzantine period were Nicom- edia (Izmit/Kocaeli), Prusa (Bursa), Nicaea (Iznik), and the Byzantine capital Constantinople, which were located on the trade routes between Europe, Asia Minor, and the Levant. Other urban centers were also present, as well as villages that cannot now be located (Lefort 1995; Foss 1996: 1, 13; Bondoux 2003: 380-408; Lefort 2003; Beker-Nielsen 2008: 18-19; Korsvoll 2008: 6; Belke 2010: 48-52, 59; Belke 2013: 87-95; Grünbart 2013. For the region in the Roman period and the inscriptions, see Guinea Díaz 1997: 57-130). In the Byzantine period, this region was part of Bithynia, which was part of the Opsikion theme (province), which was the largest and most important of the early themes, thanks in part to its close proximity to Constantinople. The capital of the theme was originally Ancyra (modern Ankara) but after being the base of many revolts, the theme was broken up into three separate themes in the 8th century to prevent it from being the center of further revolt against the empire. The capital was subsequently moved to Nicaea, which was clearly the largest center of the region and a center of administration and trade, but the revolts continued. Its great rival was the city of Nicomedia which was the capital of the Optimatoi theme. The importance of the Marmara area as an im- portant Middle Byzantine monastic center is indicated by the fact that the records of over 60 monasteries have survived, some of which were founded by Constantinopolitan nobility (Janin 1921: 180-182; Mango and Ševčenko 1973; Lefort 1966: 367-369; Auzepy 2003; Belke 2013: 95-96. For the region in general see Janin 1921: 169-173, 178-179; Belke 2013: 84-85), archaeolog- ical sites have been iden- tified (Auzepy et al. 2005; Auzepy 2006; Auzepy et al. 2007, 2008, 2009) and fortifications have been documented in the region (Giros 2003). Some Mid- dle Byzantine graffiti have been located on the coast in the region and a possible Fig. 1. Part of Ancient Bithynia with Byzantine Middle Byzantine bounda- cemetery sites of Barcın and Ilıpınar. Anatolica XLII, 2016 173 ry stone on the northern shores of Lake Ascania (now Lake Iznik) (Kiortzian 2003: 60, 63). The main geographical feature of the region was the lake, where a Byzantine church was recent- ly located under water (Powell 2014). Protected by a series of fortresses (Giros 2003: 215-218), the lake was renowned for its fish and the hinterland of Nicaea for its vineyards, gardens, and other agricultural riches (Lefort 1996: 366-367; Foss 1996: 31-35). Despite all this prosperity, however, the region was not so peaceful in the 10th and 11th centuries. At that time, Nicaea was fought over in a number of revolts and it then became the capital of the Seljuk Turks possessions in Asia Minor in 1081. It was retaken in 1097 by the Byzantines with the aid of the First Crusade, whose travails in Asia Minor were described viv- idly in the sources. In order to reach Nicaea, the Crusaders had to also capture other towns and fortresses so that they should not be surrounded by enemy territory as they marched forward. Further, they happily killed the populations they met along way, both the local Christians as well as the Turks, destroying churches, and committing various atrocities. The Turks were equally unpleasant in the way that they treated both the Crusaders as well as the local popula- tion, apparently marauding the countryside when it was under their control. As the Crusaders besieged the city of Nicaea, the Crusaders found themselves encamped in the countryside for seven weeks, which caused them difficulties in obtaining supplies and inflicted suffering on the population in the countryside. Most notoriously, however, in order to demoralize the Turks holding Nicaea, the Crusaders cut the heads off of the dead Turkish soldiers and threw them into the city (Foss 1996: 17-49; Cheynet 2003: 320-321, 324-330; Albu 2005: 5; Frankopan 2012: 122-123, 139-145; Grünbart 2013: 117; Harris 2014: 64; Peacock 2015. For trans- lations of Middle Byzantine sources for this period see Kravari 2003: 73-82). All the armies and violence doubtless had a deleterious effect on the countryside although the exact impact remains unclear archaeologically. Material remains of Barcın and its Byzantine cemetery While there have been a number of architectural surveys in the region that have doc- umented different types of building remains and inscriptions, the amount of archaeological work on Byzantine sites in the countryside outside of Nicaea, which has been the subject of many excavations, remains small. The work of the Netherlands Institute for the Near East (NINO) and the Netherlands Institute in Turkey (NIT) has uncovered Byzantine remains at the sites of Ilıpınar and Barcın. This lack of study is not surprising given the generally small number of Byzantine sites excavated outside of major urban centers such as Ephesus and Sard- is. Understanding of the Byzantine countryside still remains problematic although there have been attempts to understand the regions better (see, for instance, Vorderstrasse and Rooden- berg 2009). The site of Barcın is located near the town of Yenişehir. Despite the commonly held assumption that Yenişehir was an Ottoman foundation, it seems more likely that was oc- cupied at least by the Byzantine period. This has been suggested because of the large number of Byzantine settlements (Lindner 2007: 103, no. 1) and a Christian inscription (Pargoire 1906: 217) found in the area. Thanks to architectural surveys, however, Byzantine remains had already been known at Barcın prior to its excavation. Ötüken reported that embedded in the ground next to the 174 Tasha Vorderstrasse fountain of the mosque was a fragment of a decorated part of a chancel which he seems to date to the Middle Byzantine period on the basis of its width (Ötüken 1996: 57, 69-71, Taf. 5,3) although it has been suggested by Pralong that it dates to the Early Byzantine period on the basis of a parallel with Salamis in Cyprus.
Recommended publications
  • Atlas of American Orthodox Christian Monasteries
    Atlas of American Orthodox Christian Monasteries Atlas of Whether used as a scholarly introduction into Eastern Christian monasticism or researcher’s directory or a travel guide, Alexei Krindatch brings together a fascinating collection of articles, facts, and statistics to comprehensively describe Orthodox Christian Monasteries in the United States. The careful examina- Atlas of American Orthodox tion of the key features of Orthodox monasteries provides solid academic frame for this book. With enticing verbal and photographic renderings, twenty-three Orthodox monastic communities scattered throughout the United States are brought to life for the reader. This is an essential book for anyone seeking to sample, explore or just better understand Orthodox Christian monastic life. Christian Monasteries Scott Thumma, Ph.D. Director Hartford Institute for Religion Research A truly delightful insight into Orthodox monasticism in the United States. The chapters on the history and tradition of Orthodox monasticism are carefully written to provide the reader with a solid theological understanding. They are then followed by a very human and personal description of the individual US Orthodox monasteries. A good resource for scholars, but also an excellent ‘tour guide’ for those seeking a more personal and intimate experience of monasticism. Thomas Gaunt, S.J., Ph.D. Executive Director Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate (CARA) This is a fascinating and comprehensive guide to a small but important sector of American religious life. Whether you want to know about the history and theology of Orthodox monasticism or you just want to know what to expect if you visit, the stories, maps, and directories here are invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The
    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses X Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey Edited by Ergün Laflı Izmir 2020 Last update: 04/05/2020. 1 Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. Papers presented at the international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity, May 14-15, 2020 / Izmir, Turkey, Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea – Acta congressus communis omnium gentium Smyrnae. Copyright © 2020 Ergün Laflı (editor) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the editor. ISBN: 978-605-031-211-9. Page setting: Ergün Laflı (Izmir). Text corrections and revisions: Hugo Thoen (Deinze / Ghent). Papers, presented at the international video conference, entitled “Cappadocia and Cappadocians in the Hellenistic, Roman and Early Byzantine periods. An international video conference on the southeastern part of central Anatolia in classical antiquity” in May 14–15, 2020 in Izmir, Turkey. 36 papers with 61 pages and numerous colourful figures. All papers and key words are in English. 21 x 29,7 cm; paperback; 40 gr. quality paper. Frontispiece. A Roman stele with two portraits in the Museum of Kırşehir; accession nos. A.5.1.95a-b (photograph by E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Instrumental Cross and the Use of the Gospel Book Troyes, Bibliothèque Municipale MS 960
    The Instrumental Cross and the Use of the Gospel Book Troyes, Bibliothèque Municipale MS 960 Beatrice Kitzinger In approximately 909, a Breton named Matian together with his wife Digrenet donated a gospel manuscript to a church called Rosbeith. They intended it should remain there on pain of anathema, never to be taken from the church by force but provided with a dispensation for removal by students for the express purpose of writing or reading. With the exception of the date, which is recorded elsewhere in the manuscript, these specifications all appear in a short text written in distinctive, highlighted script at the close of Luke’s chapter list (f. 71): These little letters recount how Matian, and his wife Digrenet, gave these four books of the gospel as a gift to the church of Rosbeith for their souls. And whosoever should remove this evangelium from that church by force, may he be anathema—excepting a student [in order] to write or to read.1 The location of Rosbeith is unknown, but we may surmise that it was a church attached to a larger abbey in Brittany, according to Breton nomenclature.2 Apart from their Breton origins and evident appreciation for scholarship, the identities of Matian and Digrenet are similarly murky. The particularizing nature of the note extends only to a statement of Matian and Digrenet’s motive for the gift—“for their souls”—and a designation of the contents: “these four books of the gospel.” We know, however, that the couple was anxious Kitzinger – Instrumental Cross about the fate of their souls at judgment, and we know that they thought the gospel manuscript at hand might help.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Objects and Western Desires: Relics and Reliquaries Between Byzantium and the West
    Eastern Objects and Western Desires: Relics and Reliquaries between Byzantium and the West Holger A. Klein Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Vol. 58. (2004), pp. 283-314. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0070-7546%282004%2958%3C283%3AEOAWDR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U Dumbarton Oaks Papers is currently published by Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/doaks.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Procession Guide
    Central Lutheran Church Winona, Minnesota Acolytes are ministers in worship. Acolytes help set the mood for worship by lighting of candles, leading processions, and gathering offerings. Other ministers and the entire congregation rely on Acolytes to carry out their ministry with confidence. Typical Duties: LIGHT & EXTINGUISH CANDLES LEAD THE PROCESSIONS HOLD THE PRESIDER BOOK COLLECT OFFERINGS AS THEY ARE PRESENTED ASSIST WITH COMMUNION CLC Acolyte Guide p. 1 3 The Church: One Body, Many Parts 4 Be Reverent 5 Be Responsible 7 Acolyte Words A-Z 11 Order of Worship 12 The Church Year 13 Other Random Stuff to Know 15 Pledge: I Will Serve God With Gladness CLC Acolyte Guide p. 2 The apostle Paul said that the church is like our own bodies. Our bodies each have many parts. We have eyes to see and ears to hear. We have mouths to speak and noses to smell. We have legs to walk, knees to bend, arms to reach, hands to hold. We have brains to think and hearts to love. The church is Christ’s body, made up of many parts. Christ is the head and we are the members. Worship is something that the whole body of Christ does— head and members together. We do some things all together: like sitting, standing, bowing, singing, walking in procession. And different parts of the body do different things so that the whole body can celebrate. One person reads while all listen. Some people play musical instruments while all sing. All of these things are done so that the whole body of Christ can give God thanks and praise.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of St Anna's Cult in Byzantium
    ASPECTS OF ST ANNA’S CULT IN BYZANTIUM by EIRINI PANOU A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 Acknowledgments It is said that a PhD is a lonely work. However, this thesis, like any other one, would not have become reality without the contribution of a number of individuals and institutions. First of all of my academical mother, Leslie Brubaker, whose constant support, guidance and encouragement accompanied me through all the years of research. Of the National Scholarship Foundation of Greece ( I.K.Y.) with its financial help for the greatest part of my postgraduate studies. Of my father George, my mother Angeliki and my bother Nick for their psychological and financial support, and of my friends in Greece (Lily Athanatou, Maria Sourlatzi, Kanela Oikonomaki, Maria Lemoni) for being by my side in all my years of absence. Special thanks should also be addressed to Mary Cunningham for her comments on an early draft of this thesis and for providing me with unpublished material of her work. I would like also to express my gratitude to Marka Tomic Djuric who allowed me to use unpublished photographic material from her doctoral thesis. Special thanks should also be addressed to Kanela Oikonomaki whose expertise in Medieval Greek smoothened the translation of a number of texts, my brother Nick Panou for polishing my English, and to my colleagues (Polyvios Konis, Frouke Schrijver and Vera Andriopoulou) and my friends in Birmingham (especially Jane Myhre Trejo and Ola Pawlik) for the wonderful time we have had all these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Iconography in Byzantine Cappadocia
    RESEARCH ARTICLE European Journal of Theology and Philosophy www.ej-theology.org Aspects of Iconography in Byzantine Cappadocia E. Ene D-Vasilescu ABSTRACT The main novelty my article brings concerns a particular iconographic motif: that known as the ‘trial by the water of reproach’. In the few cases Published Online: August 17, 2021 where this is rendered, usually only Mary is presented as undergoing this ISSN: 2736-5514 test, but in Cappadocian art Joseph is also subjected to it. DOI :10.24018/theology.2021.1.4.35 Additionally, to this visual topic, another one that is rarely depicted will be introduced and commented upon: that known as ‘Christ’s first bath’. E. Ene D-Vasilescu* I will provide a particular example: the fresco which constitutes part of (e-mail: elena.ene-yahoo.co.uk) the decoration that embellishes the walls of Karabaş Kilise/ ‘The Big Church’ in Soğanlı Valley, southern Cappadocia. *Corresponding Author A few images – one of them never published before – have been included within this publication. Keywords: Byzantium, Byzantine frescoes, Cappadocia, Constantine VII Porphyrogenetus. Karabaş church in the Soğanlı Valley, Phocas family, the Old and New Tokalı churches in Göreme. Cappadocians occupied a region from Mount Taurus (Fig. 1) I. INTRODUCTION to the vicinity of the Pontus Euxine (the Black Sea) [1]. The current piece is concerned with two rare visual motifs Therefore, the province was bordered in the south by the that can be found among other images which decorate Taurus Mountains that separate it from Cilicia to the east by churches established in Cappadocia under Byzantine rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbols of the Bishop
    SYMBOLS OF THE BISHOP THE BISHOP'S CHAIR The cathedral houses the bishop's throne, or cathedra, (which is the Latin word for "seat" or "chair"). In the ancient world, the chair was not only the symbol of a teacher but also of a magistrate. Thus, the cathedra symbolizes the bishop’s role as teacher and as the governing authority of the diocese. CROSIER The crosier is a pastoral staff that is conferred on bishops (and abbots). The top of the staff is curved to remind the bishop of the shepherd’s crook and of his pastoral care of the people entrusted to him. It symbolizes the bishop’s duty to keep watch over his whole flock, sustaining the weak and wavering, solidifying the faith, and leading those gone astray back into the true fold. ZUCCHETTO The zucchetto is a skullcap worn as part of the liturgical and choir dress of the pope, cardinals, bishops, abbots and priests. During the 13th century, it was developed to cover the tonsure (portion of hair that is shaved when a man entered into the clerical state.) The pope wears a white zucchetto; cardinals, a red zucchetto; and bishops, a purple zucchetto. Black is reserved for all others. PECTORAL CROSS The pectoral cross is worn by the pope, cardinals, bishops and abbots. Tradition holds that reliquaries of the True Cross were worn over the heart; hence, the modern day custom of it being worn over the breast (pectus). The pectoral cross reflects the dignity of the office of bishop or abbot. The cross is either worn suspended from a ceremonial cord at liturgical services or on a chain with his clerical suit.
    [Show full text]
  • Practicing Love of God in Medieval Jerusalem, Gaul and Saxony
    he collection of essays presented in “Devotional Cross-Roads: Practicing Love of God in Medieval Gaul, Jerusalem, and Saxony” investigates test case witnesses of TChristian devotion and patronage from Late Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages, set in and between the Eastern and Western Mediterranean, as well as Gaul and the regions north of the Alps. Devotional practice and love of God refer to people – mostly from the lay and religious elite –, ideas, copies of texts, images, and material objects, such as relics and reliquaries. The wide geographic borders and time span are used here to illustrate a broad picture composed around questions of worship, identity, reli- gious affiliation and gender. Among the diversity of cases, the studies presented in this volume exemplify recurring themes, which occupied the Christian believer, such as the veneration of the Cross, translation of architecture, pilgrimage and patronage, emergence of iconography and devotional patterns. These essays are representing the research results of the project “Practicing Love of God: Comparing Women’s and Men’s Practice in Medieval Saxony” guided by the art historian Galit Noga-Banai, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the histori- an Hedwig Röckelein, Georg-August-University Göttingen. This project was running from 2013 to 2018 within the Niedersachsen-Israeli Program and financed by the State of Lower Saxony. Devotional Cross-Roads Practicing Love of God in Medieval Jerusalem, Gaul and Saxony Edited by Hedwig Röckelein, Galit Noga-Banai, and Lotem Pinchover Röckelein/Noga-Banai/Pinchover Devotional Cross-Roads ISBN 978-3-86395-372-0 Universitätsverlag Göttingen Universitätsverlag Göttingen Hedwig Röckelein, Galit Noga-Banai, and Lotem Pinchover (Eds.) Devotional Cross-Roads This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • (PART I) Pantelis CHARALAMPAKIS* This Paper1 Is the Outcome
    2016 2 / 2 (1-17) 12 SHORT NOTES ON THE PROSOPOGRAPHY OF THE BYZANTINE THEME OF KOLONEIA (PART I) * Pantelis CHARALAMPAKIS *Research Fellow, Centre for This paper1 is the outcome of a preliminary study re- Advanced Study, Sofia. lated to the TAKTIKON database developed at the [email protected] 2 Academy of Athens, Greece. The history and proso- pography of the Byzantine theme of Koloneia in the Pontos area have been so far discussed in a very few – yet important – works only, and this is not because of lack of interest, but because of the limited infor- mation provided by literary sources and the small number of seals discovered. The main objective is to publish two so far unknown lead seals issued by officials who served in the theme of Koloneia, as well as to provide the reader with up- dated prosopographical lists of the thematic offi- cials. Needless to say, the prosopographical lists pre- sented in this paper are incomplete, because there are more unpublished collections of seals – some of them hard to access – that have to be examined. In a future second part of this study we shall present the remaining offices, together with discussion on some -------------------------------------------------------- 1 I would like to thank Dr. Osman Emir for encouraging me to write for KAREN Studies and also for his warm hospitality in Trabzon in May 2016. Moreover, I am indebted to Dr. Harald Schulze (Archäologische Staatssammlung München) and Dr. Vassa Kontouma (IFEB), for granting me permission to publish the seals, and, of course, to Prof. Jean-Claude Cheynet, who shared information and provided me with photos of the IFEB and BnF specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia and the Pontus
    A r me n ia an d t he p on t u s BY E I R AM ARC D . S The Stat e of A rm e nia that is to be crea ted by th e Peace Co nference wi ll nat ura lly i nclude wi t hi nit s co n fi nes th e dis nd— l A t riet of Trebiz o the B lack Sea litt ora of rmenia . Ther e d in n n l i s t o be foun this regio a co siderab e Greek populat ion . V n l n . d l M r e iz e os , in the mem ora um on the t erri toria claims w S u d of Greece , hich he bmit te t o the Peace Conferenc e , advoca t ed that said district be incl uded in the pr opose d A — A n S tat e of Armenia . Greek rmenian com mi ssi o which held it s sessio ns in Pa ris has already agre ed upon a p lan which will insure the Greeks of Trebi zond full cu lt ural n \V e t n n and aut o om y . rej oice tha Arme ia Gre ek l eaders have thus laid t he foundation of an Arme no - Greek rap roch ement ld n and n p , which shou devel op i t o a clos e e during n friendshi p between the two ki dr ed races . Thi s paper has two purposes " (a ) To examine and det er t h e n and mine geographical , e th ographical , his torical eco nomic st atus of Po ntus and (b ) t o show tha t Pontus is an A n i nt egral part of rme ia .
    [Show full text]