Byram -Cum- Sutton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Byram -Cum- Sutton Byram -cum- Sutton Village Design Statement Supplementary Planning Document February 2012 Contents VDS O bjectives Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1 To Provide a record of local distinctiveness by The Byram Village Design Statement 1 describing the unique qualities and character of the Introducing the village 2 village. M ap 4 Character summary 5 To identify the key features and characteristics of Character A rea 1: O ld Byram 6 the local natural and built environment to be Character A rea 2: Suburban Estates 8 respected and protected from the impact of inappropriate development. Appendices A : W hat is a Village Design Statement 9 To provide design guidance for new development so and how do I use it? that change is managed and development is in B: G eneral advice for prospective 11 harmony w ith its setting. developers To achieve a higher standard of sustainable design and w here possible to enhance the local environment. To increase the involvement and influence of the local community in the planning system. Location M ap N ot to scale Reproduced from the O rdnance Survey w ith the permission of the controller of H er M ajesty’s Stationary O ffice. © Crow n Copyright. U nauthorised reproduction infringes crow n copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Selby District Council 100018656 Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1.0 O ur villages all occupy a unique position in application process, as the design context is the surrounding countryside, and have evolved clearly set out from the beginning. W here over hundreds of years to suit the needs and design is not respectful to the village, the VDS circumstances of the people w ho lived there can be used as evidence to justify the refusal of through the ages. A s a result of this, w e are planning permission. It can also be used to naturally draw n to the elements that make our demonstrate that a proposed development is in ow n village different from others, and those character and may therefore support a things that make it unique. planning application. 1.1 M ore recently, volume house building and 1.5 Therefore the Local Planning A uthority standardisation has failed to reflect both the w elcomes early discussion w ith anyone subtle and obvious elements that create this considering undertaking any w ork so that a local distinctiveness. Coupled w ith this, political consensus can be achieved, and local character ideology, personal tastes and cultural changes can be maintained. have all played their part in the design of buildings. It is now recognised that local The B yram V D S distinctiveness is vital in helping to integrate new 1.6 Byram village is a commuter settlement on development and in creating sustainable the top of a ridge overlooking the flat plain of communities. This can be achieved through an the River A ire. A line of attractive individual understanding of local character, and ensuring mansions has over the years been flanked by that this understanding is shared w ith anyone several volume estates, built in varying degrees considering development. around a garden village style. 1.2 A Village Design Statement (VDS) is such a method. It is intended to explain the context or character of the village so that anyone w ho is considering any form of development in the village - no matter how large or small - can do it sympathetically. The VDS covers relatively straightforw ard w ork such as replacing doors and w indow s as w ell as more significant w ork such as building extensions and complete new buildings. It sets out the elements that make up character in order to improve the quality of design in any new development. 1.3 The description of local character in this VDS is not intended to be prescriptive - new development should not be designed to “look old”. Instead the VDS should be used as inspiration to design new modern development that is respectful to its surroundings. In this context, that means using the appropriate building materials and architectural styles, and respecting the importance of spaces, building orientation, juxtaposition and size. O verall, new development should look new , and should not slavishly copy the old buildings. H ow ever, new development should “fit in” w ith the context of the village. 1.4 The VDS is w ritten so that all developers can avoid lengthy discussion in the planning 1 Introducing the village 2.0 Byram cum Sutton village is located in south 2.3 The camp w as sold off in the 1950s to the w est corner of Selby District, astride the old G reat O sgoldcross Rural District Council w ho housed N orth Road, some 10 miles south w est of Selby, residents of derelict houses from Brotherton, new and 3 miles north of Pontefract. homes w ere provided w hen the w ooden huts used by the M O D w ere demolished. Byram 2.1 Brotherton and Byram villages w ould became a parish in the 1970's to form part of the normally be just one if it w ere not for the former new Selby District Council. A 1 dual carriagew ay that bisects them. The road has now been declassified due to the new A 1(M ) 2.4 Byram settlement w as originally intended to motorw ay built some 1 mile to the w est. provide housing to replace the deteriorating H ow ever, the physical scar of the sunken road limestone cottages in Brotherton – a plan only remains, still separating the villages. partially implemented. The plan included a range of family housing w ith amenities including a school and leisure facilities, but only the houses w ere eventually constructed. M ost of the council housing is now privately ow ned. A handful of local services such as Post O ffice/general store, chip shop, new sagents/general store and doctors’ surgery have also developed. 2.2 Byram village is built on land at the top of the hill above Brotherton on the eastern side of the former A 1. It is essentially a single street of large villa type properties built into the hillside to maximise the view s southw ard. The hamlet of Sutton extends this street and comprises Sutton 2.5 The villages are know n for nearby Foxcliff H all and associated outbuildings w hich have Q uarry (also know n as Brotherton Q uarry) that been converted to domestic dw ellings, around appears on the 1861 census. The quarry measures half a kilometre to the east. H ow ever in the some 42 hectares and w as a major source of 1950s, Byram w as developed, sw amping the villas M agnesian Limestone, a common building w ith suburban type housing built on land that material on the w estern side of Selby District and once formed part of the Byram H all Estate. in W est Yorkshire. There are other similar Sir John Ramsden w as the local baronet. Byram quarries in nearby W omersley, and Smeaton H all Estate encompassed land from Burton Lime w orks. Salmon, H illam, dow n to Birkin right over to the river A ire. The estate w as sold to the M O D in the 1930's and used as a barracks, and a Prisoner of W ar camp holding G erman and Italian prisoners w ho w orked the land. 2 Introducing the village 2.6 The famous A rchitect John Carr w ho came to 2.9 The houses in Sutton Lane w ere built by w ealthy be regarded as the leading architect in the N orth people w ho employed architects to replicate other of England w as born in 1723 in the area. H e w as large houses found around the U K, and the later the eldest of the nine children of Rose Lascelles suburban areas w ere built in a time w here heritage and Robert Carr, a stonemason and quarry and traditional buildings w ere not in favour. A s a ow ner in H orbury. O n leaving school John joined result, Byram is not a typical picture postcard N orth the family business learning construction and Yorkshire village. N evertheless, there is a character to draughtmanship w hile he w orked at Bretton H all the tw o areas formed from an understanding of the and Chevet Park. These skills stood him in good values of those w ho built the village, rather than in stead w hen he began his architectural practice an architectural theme. around 1748. H e designed, extended and altered many country houses for the nobility and gentry, as w ell as a number of public buildings many of w hich are in Yorkshire. These include Byram H all and farm that w as remodelled in 1770. 2.7 Byram lies on the eastern side of the former A 1 that dissects the tw o villages. The view from the village across the fields to the south is spectacular because of the elevated position that gives a w ide panoramic view across to the hills of Pontefract across the River A ire floodplain. The presence of the pow er station, motorw ay and other industry has changed this view , but it remains impressive in its far-reaching view s. 2.8 A side from a small area of farming and commercial use, the village is split in to tw o main character areas: the original large houses, and the later post-w ar suburban style extensions.
Recommended publications
  • North Yorkshire County Council Business and Environmental Services Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee 21 January 2020 P
    North Yorkshire County Council Business and Environmental Services Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee 21 January 2020 PLANNING APPLICATION ACCOMPANIED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE VARIATION OF CONDITION NO’S 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 26, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 & 62 OF PLANNING PERMISSION REF. NO. C8/2013/0677/CPO ‘THE RELOCATION OF COLLIERY ACTIVITIES AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENERGY CENTRE TO RECOVER ENERGY FROM WASTE WITH ANCILLARY DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING OFFICES AND UTILITY USES (E.G. WORKSHOPS AND ELECTRICAL ROOMS); PARKING; A NEW ACCESS POINT AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING ACCESS; INTERNAL ROADS; RAILWAY SIDINGS; A WEIGHBRIDGE AND GATEHOUSE; A SUBSTATION AND TRANSFORMER COMPOUND; A NATIONAL GRID CONNECTION; PRIVATE WIRE CONNECTION TO THE COLLIERY; SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS; LIGHTING; CCTV; LANDSCAPING AND FENCING ON LAND AT KELLINGLEY COLLIERY, TURVER’S LANE, KNOTTINGLEY, WEST YORKSHIRE, WF11 8DT.’ THE PROPOSED VARIATIONS RELATE TO:- INCREASING THE CONSENTED ANNUAL THROUGHPUT OF WASTE AT THE ENERGY CENTRE, INCREASING THE TWO WAY HGV MOVEMENTS, INCREASING THE TWO WAY HGV MOVEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENERGY CENTRE, CHANGES TO ASPECTS OF THE CONSENTED DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE PLANT SELECTION INCLUDING CHANGES TO THE TURBINE HALL, BOILER HALL, FGT PLANT AND ACC UNIT, AND CHANGES TO THE CONSENTED CONSTRUCTION PHASING TO INCLUDE THE USE OF THE FORMER KELLINGLEY COLLIERY ACCESS ON LAND AT LAND AT THE FORMER KELLINGLEY COLLIERY, TURVERS LANE, KELLINGLEY, SELBY, WF11 8DT ON BEHALF OF PEEL ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED (SELBY DISTRICT) (OSGOLDCROSS, MID SELBY, SOUTH SELBY ELECTORAL DIVISION) Report of the Corporate Director – Business and Environmental Services 1.0 Purpose of the report 1.1 To determine a planning application accompanied by an Environmental Statement for the purposes of the variation of condition no’s 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 26, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 & 62 of planning permission ref.
    [Show full text]
  • (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1997 No. 624 HOUSING, ENGLAND AND WALES The Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 Made - - - - 5th March 1997 Laid before Parliament 7th March 1997 Coming into force - - 1st April 1997 The Secretary of State for the Environment, as respects England, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 17 of the Housing Act 1996(1) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order— Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st April 1997. Designated rural areas 2. The following areas shall be designated rural areas for the purposes of section 17 of the Housing Act 1996 (the right to acquire) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (additional right to enfranchise)— (a) the parishes in the districts of the East Riding of Yorkshire, Hartlepool, Middlesborough, North East Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees specified in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of Schedule 1 to this Order and in the counties of Durham, Northumberland, North Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear and West Yorkshire specified in Parts VIII, IX, X, XI,
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Previous Minutes Were Agreed
    Ferrybridge Community Liaison Group Meeting ‘Ian Marchant’ Pavilion, Date: 17th January 2018 Location: Ferrybridge ‘C’ Power Station Date issued: Recorded by: Jade Fearon Attendees: Jade Fearon, SSE (JF) Lyndon Sutliffe, ETEX (LS) Apologies: Stephanie Gilbert, AIRE/ Brotherton PC Nick Hinde, SSE (NH) (SG) Alex Shenton, HZI (AS) Michael Wainwright, SINIAT (MW) Richard Lowe, Aecom (RL) David York, Ballast Phoenix (DY) Andrew Cable, Osgoldcross (AC) Matt Knight, FM2 (MN) Ian Foster, Environment Agency (IF) Justin Mayes, HZI (JM) David Davies, Bryam cum Sutton PC (DD) Chris Gaughan, Environment Agency (CG) Roy Wilson, representing Nigel Adams MP (RW) Harry Ellis, WMDC (HE) Jackie Dennis, Oakhill Park RA (JD) Miles Beckett, SSE (MB) Jennifer Mitchell, Byram Cum Sutton PC (JM) Keith Shenton, Pollards Fields resident (KS) Rita Stephenson, Fairburn PC (RS) Glenn Burton, Knottingley (GB) Colin Drew, MEL (CD) Glenn Burton, Knottingley (GB) Steve Davis, FM2 (SD) Don Simpson, AIRE/ Brotherton PC (DS) Graham Stokes, WMDC (GS) Ray Newton, Monk Fryston and Hillam Community Association (RN) Joanna Holland, Ballast Phoenix (JH) David Nicklin, Byram cum Sutton PC (DN) Graham Stokes, WMDC (GS) Alison Drake, Friends of Fryston Wood AD Page 1 of 4 Contact Details Jade Fearon (Community Liaison Manager) 01724 788236/ 07854 313526 (Monday to Thursday 08:30 – 17:00) Purpose of Meeting To inform the group of the status of the Ferrybridge C power station, of the Siniat gypsum facility, the operations of the Ferrybridge Multifuel 1 plant and the construction of the Multifuel 2 power station. This committee satisfies the requirement of Condition 58 of the S.36 consent for the development of the Multifuel power station.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSION STATEMENT to Improve the Quality Of
    MISSION STATEMENT To Improve the Quality of Life For Those Who Live and Work in the District Please ask for: Glenn Shelley Direct Dial No: 01757 292007 Fax No: 01757 292020 E-mail [email protected] 21 February 2011 Dear Councillor You are hereby summoned to a meeting of the Selby District Council to be held in the Civic Suite, Civic Centre, Portholme Road, Selby on Tuesday 1 March 2011 commencing at 6.00 pm. Yours sincerely Jonathan Lund Deputy Chief Executive Opening Prayers will be offered. 1 AGENDA 1. Apologies for Absence To receive apologies for absence. 2. Disclosure of Interest To receive any disclosures of interest in matters to be considered at the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Section 117 of the Local Government Act 1972, and Sections 50, 52 and 81 of the Local Government Act 2000 and the Members’ Code of Conduct adopted by the Council. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of Council held on 21 December 2010 (pages 6 to 12 attached) and the Extraordinary Council meeting on 15 February 2011 (TO FOLLOW). 4. Communications (pages 13 to 16 attached). 5. Public Questions To consider questions, if any, notice of which has been given in accordance with rule 5.20 of the Constitution. 6. Councillors’ Questions To consider questions, if any, notice of which has been given in accordance with rule 5.21 of the Constitution. 7. Committee and Board Minutes Planning Committee Green Minutes 438 to 455 15 December 2010 Pages 17 to 28 Planning Committee Minutes 484 to 493 12
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 1 Ith January 1990
    500 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 1 ITH JANUARY 1990 BRIGHTON. No. of Matter—25 of 1979. Last Day for Receiving MARMOT, Barry Alec of Higher Tor, Poundsgate, Ashburton, Proofs—Tuesday, 25th January 1990. Name of Trustee and Devon, Designer, formerly employed as an Architect (described in Address—Eckley, Neville Richard, 332 Brighton Road, South the Receiving Order as Barry Marmot). Court—TORQUAY. No. Croydon, Surrey CR2 6AJ. of Matter—15 of 1978. Last Day for Receiving Proofs—26th January 1990. Name of Trustee and Address—Gibbs, Walter B., 94 Rosebarn Lane, Pennsylvania, Exeter, Devon EX4 5DG. WILSON, Stephen Hamilton, Salesman, of 25 Pulborough Way, Middleton-on-Sea, in the county of West Sussex, and WOODRIFFE, Malcolm Robert, Salesman, of 9 Livingstone GUPTA, Dr. Kaushal Kumar, residing at 185 Hugh Street, Road, Hove, in the county of East Sussex, lately trading in Castleford, West Yorshire, formerly residing at The Bungalow, partnership under the name or style of "West Sussex Woodcraft", Marsh Lane, Byram-cum-Sutton, Knottingley, West Yorkshire at Fitzalan Road, Arundel, in the county of West Sussex. WF11 9NG carrying on business as a General Medical Formerly Company Directors. (Separate Estate of Stephen Practitioner at The Surgery, The Community Centre, St. Edwards Hamilton Wilson). Court BRIGHTON. No. of Matter—108 of Close, Byram, North Yorkshire WF11 9NT. Court— 1983. Last Day for Receiving Proofs—Wednesday, 25th January WAKEFIELD. No. of Matter—54 of 1986. Last Day for 1990. Name of Trustee and Address—Eckley, Neville, 3 Silver Receiving Proofs—31st January 1990. Trustees Name and Street, Wiveliscombe, Taunton, Somerset TA4 2PA.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for North Yorkshire County Council
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for North Yorkshire County Council Report to The Electoral Commission October 2004 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. Report no: 385 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 23 2 Current electoral arrangements 27 3 Draft recommendation 37 4 Responses to consultation 39 5 Analysis and final recommendations 41 6 What happens next? 81 Appendix A Final recommendations for North Yorkshire: Detailed mapping 83 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI No. 3962). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government's Proposals for New Assisted Areas
    68 1 2 . NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. b- L. REPORT To: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Subject: THE GOVERNMENT’S COMMITTEE PROPOSALS FOR NEW ASSISTED AREAS From: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT Date: 26 JULY 1999 I Ref: TCREP596.doc 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To inform the Committee of the outcome of the Government’s review of -4ssisted Area status and eligibility for Government Regional Policy assistance. 2 Background 2.1 The main form of assistance given by the UK Government within Assisted Areas is ‘Regional Selective Assistance’ (RSA) which provides discretionary grants to firms in support of projects which will create or safeguard jobs, increase competitiveness and generate benefits for the wider regional economy. 2.2 On 30 July 1998, the Government produced a consultation document which sought views on deriving a common methodology for reviewing Assisted Areas. Following discussions with colleagues at South Lanarkshire Council and the Lanarkshire Development Agency, North Lanarkshire Council submitted a response through this committee on 8 October 1998. 2.3 On 6 July 1999, the UK Government released its proposed Assisted Area Map to be operative from 1 January 2000 pending the approval of the European Commission. 3 The Government’s Proposals-Geographic Selection and Indicators Used 3.1 The Government considered a variety of possible geographical units. While recognising that larger units such as Local Authority boundaries have a wider range of statistical information available and that these numbers are more robust, the Government considered that they could lead to an inefficient targeting of regional aid. It was considered that the use of larger geographic units might lead to the exclusion of many deserving localities simply on the grounds that they were part of a larger unit which did not demonstrate its eligibility across its whole area.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2009
    UK Data Archive Study Number 6255 -International Passenger Survey, 2009 Airline code Airline name Code /Au1 /Australia - dump code 50099 /Au2 /Austria - dump code 21099 /Ba /Barbados - dump code 70599 /Be1 /Belgium - dump code 05099 /Be2 /Benin - dump code 45099 /Br /Brazil - dump code 76199 /Ca /Canada - dump code 80099 /Ch /Chile - dump code 76499 /Co /Costa Rica - dump code 77199 /De /Denmark - dump code 12099 /Ei /Ei EIRE dump code 02190 /Fi /Finland - dump code 17099 /Fr /France - dump code 07099 /Ge /Germany - dump code 08099 /Gr /Greece - dump code 22099 /Gu /Guatemala - dump code 77399 /Ho /Honduras - dump code 77499 /Ic /Iceland - dump code 02099 /In /India - dump code 61099 /Ir /Irish Rep - dump code 02199 /Is /Israel - dump code 57099 /It /Italy - dump code 10099 /Ja /Japan - dump code 62099 /Ka /Kampuchea - dump code 65499 /Ke /Kenya - dump code 41099 /La /Latvia - dump code 31799 /Le /Lebanon - dump code 57499 /Lu /Luxembourg - dump code 06099 /Ma /Macedonia - dump code 27399 /Me /Mexico - dump code 76299 /Mo /Montenegro - dump code 27499 /NA /Nauru (Dump) 54099 /Ne1 /Netherlands - dump code 11099 /Ne2 /New Guinea - dump code 53099 /Ne3 /New Zealand - dump code 51099 /Ni /Nigeria - dump code 40299 /No /Norway - dump code 18099 /Pa /Pakistan - dump code 65099 /Pe /Peru - dump code 76899 /Po /Portugal - dump code 23099 /Ro /Romania - dump code 30199 /Ru /Russia - dump code 30999 /Sa /Saudi Arabia - dump code 57599 /Se /Serbia - dump code 27599 /Sl /Slovenia - dump code 27699 /So1 /Somalia - dump code 48199 /So2 /South Africa
    [Show full text]
  • WEST YORKSHIRE POST OFFICES Compiled by Ken Smith (Updated 11/2/2020)
    WEST YORKSHIRE POST OFFICES compiled by Ken Smith (updated 11/2/2020) Aberford by 1793: TADCASTER. PP.WETHERBY 1834. UDC 1842: TADCASTER. 27-5-1853 MILFORD JUNCTION. M.O.by 1855. S.B.10-3-1862. 1-7-1861 SOUTH MILFORD RSO. T.O.1870(AAU). 1-10-1878 LEEDS. Closed 16-6-2004. Ackworth 1843: UDC: PONTEFRACT. M.O.1-4-1862. S.B.2-3-1863. T.O.1870(ABJ). Closed 17-11-2008. Ackworth Moor Top 1-5-1899: MO-SB: PONTEFRACT. T.O.10-1-1934(AXT). Closed 29-5-1973. Addingham by 1823. UDC 1832: BRADFORD. By 1844 OTLEY(&1855). No.600 allocated 1844. By 5/1856 LEEDS. M.O.2-6-1856. S.B.10-3-1862. T.O.Nov.1881(ABP). 8-10-1908 ILKLEY (relocated 31-3-2015, PO Local) Adel --see TSO of LEEDS-- Airedale (TSO) May 1924: CASTLEFORD. MO-SB 6-8-1930. Rural (&1941). TSO by 1946 >Main 30-4-2013. Allerton Bywater 1882: NORMANTON. MO-SB 1-7-1882. 1-12-1891 CASTLEFORD. 1-5-1902 NORMANTON. 17-5-1904 CASTLEFORD. T.O.18-6-1912(AYR). 29-9-1941 LEEDS. 3-8-1954 CASTLEFORD. Allerton 1845: UDC: BRADFORD. MO-SB 1-10-1883. T.O.31-7-1888(ALN). >Main 27-8-2014. --Bell Dean, Allerton 1970: BRADFORD (relocated 15-5-2015, PO Local). --Sandy Lane,Allerton: 1893: rubber: BRADFORD. Closed 30-10-2004. Almondbury (TSO) 1844: UDC: HUDDERSFIELD. M.O.1-7-1868. S.B.1-10-1868. T.O.1870(ACV). Rural>TSO 1-7-1893(new tel.code HAB) >Main 22-8-2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee
    Meeting: PLANNING COMMITTEE Date: 8 JUNE 2011 Time: 4.00PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 2 To: Councillors J Cattanach, I Chilvers, J Crawford, J Deans (Chair), Mrs D Davies, D Mackay, J McCartney, Mrs E Metcalfe, C Pearson (Vice Chair), D Peart, Mrs S Ryder and S Shaw-Wright. Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Disclosures of Interest Members of the Planning Committee should disclose personal or prejudicial interest(s) in any item on this agenda. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 6 April 2011 (pages 3 to 15 attached). 4. Chair’s Address to the Planning Committee 5. Planning Applications Received Reports of Business Manager – Dylan Jones 5.1 2010/0386/COU - Lowfield Road, Hillam, Leeds (page 17) 5.2 2011/0222/FUL - Swandam Wood, Sutton Lane, Byram (page 41) 5.3 2011/0303/HPA - Coldhill Farm, Coldhill Lane, Saxton, LS25 3EE (page 51) 5.4 2011/0286/HPA - Rose Villa, Castle Hill Lane, Drax, YO8 8NP (page 62) 5.5 2010/1179/FUL - 1 Chapel Lane, Riccall (page 73) 5.6 2011/0253/FUL - Selby War Memorial Hospital (page 88) 5.7 2011/0404/FUL - Selby War Memorial Hospital (page 97) Planning Committee 8 June 2011 1 6 Consultation response to North Yorkshire County Council Report of Business Manager – Dylan Jones 2010/1315/CPO – Darrington Quarries, Stubbs Lane, Criddling Stubbs (page 106) 7 Planning Appeals Decisions Reports of Business Manager – Dylan Jones (page 157) Reports for Information 1. List of Planning Applications Determined Under Delegated Powers Applications which have been determined by officers under the scheme of delegation.
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan
    Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan Adoption Version 22 October 2013 Copies of the accompanying evidence base including the Sustainability Appraisal Report and Background Papers can also be viewed on our website You may get further help from the Policy Team at: Selby District Council, Doncaster Road, Selby YO8 9FT [email protected] 01757 292034 01757 292229 If you require any further help or advice or if you need this document in a different format, for example large print, audio, Braille or in another language, please contact the Policy Team on (01757) 292034 or email [email protected] The Status of Regional Strategy (RS) and the Implications of the Localism Act 2011 At the time of ‘Publication’ of the Submission Draft Core Strategy (SDCS), the Development Plan for Selby District comprised the Regional Spatial Strategy (the Yorkshire and Humber Plan or RS), and ‘Saved’ Local Plan policies, namely Selby District Local Plan, North Yorkshire Minerals Local Plan and North Yorkshire Waste Local Plan. The Core Strategy is the first development plan document prepared by the Council as part of its new Local Development Framework (Local Plan). On adoption it replaces a number of the ‘Saved’ Selby District Local Plan policies1. On 6 July 2010 the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced the revocation of RS with immediate effect. As a result of the Secretary of State’s revocation decision, the Council reviewed the Core Strategy and the evidence base on which it is founded, and came to the conclusion that while the policies and context provided by RS were no longer applicable, the RS evidence base remains robust and relevant, particularly since the RS evidence had been subject to a process of consultation and Examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014
    Selby District DRAFT Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 Selby District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 Selby District DRAFT Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Key Infrastructure Areas 3 Transport 3 Energy 6 Water and Drainage 7 Waste Management 9 Education 9 Adult and Community Services 10 Health 11 Emergency Services 12 Leisure 12 Community Facilities 13 Green Infrastructure 13 3. Phasing of Development 14 4. Settlement Summaries 16 5. Conclusion 19 Appendix 1 20 Planned and Proposed Infrastructure Projects Other potential un-costed infrastructure projects Selby District DRAFT Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 1. Introduction 1.1 This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) provides a resource which outlines the presence of and planned delivery of infrastructure which is relevant to the area covered by the Local Plan for Selby District. The Local Plan is not a single document but comprises the adopted Core Strategy and the emerging Sites and Policies Local Plan (when adopted). It brings together in one document the investment plans of many different organisations, in both the public and private sector. This document gives the position as of September 2014. The IDP is an evolving document and will be updated as appropriate to present the most up-to-date picture. 1.2 The IDP was initially developed to form part of the evidence base which underpins the Core Strategy. As it is a living document it is now being updated to support the emerging Sites and Policies Local Plan (or SAPP or ‘PLAN Selby’) The initial work already undertaken with IDP consultation partners will also help to inform the PLAN Selby initial consultation and help identify the required infrastructure needs to deliver the plan.
    [Show full text]