The Government's Proposals for New Assisted Areas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Government's Proposals for New Assisted Areas 68 1 2 . NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. b- L. REPORT To: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Subject: THE GOVERNMENT’S COMMITTEE PROPOSALS FOR NEW ASSISTED AREAS From: DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT Date: 26 JULY 1999 I Ref: TCREP596.doc 1 Purpose of Report 1.1 To inform the Committee of the outcome of the Government’s review of -4ssisted Area status and eligibility for Government Regional Policy assistance. 2 Background 2.1 The main form of assistance given by the UK Government within Assisted Areas is ‘Regional Selective Assistance’ (RSA) which provides discretionary grants to firms in support of projects which will create or safeguard jobs, increase competitiveness and generate benefits for the wider regional economy. 2.2 On 30 July 1998, the Government produced a consultation document which sought views on deriving a common methodology for reviewing Assisted Areas. Following discussions with colleagues at South Lanarkshire Council and the Lanarkshire Development Agency, North Lanarkshire Council submitted a response through this committee on 8 October 1998. 2.3 On 6 July 1999, the UK Government released its proposed Assisted Area Map to be operative from 1 January 2000 pending the approval of the European Commission. 3 The Government’s Proposals-Geographic Selection and Indicators Used 3.1 The Government considered a variety of possible geographical units. While recognising that larger units such as Local Authority boundaries have a wider range of statistical information available and that these numbers are more robust, the Government considered that they could lead to an inefficient targeting of regional aid. It was considered that the use of larger geographic units might lead to the exclusion of many deserving localities simply on the grounds that they were part of a larger unit which did not demonstrate its eligibility across its whole area. The Government therefore decided to propose Assisted Areas based on groupings of locai authority wards. Comprehensive up-to-date ward level statistics are generally not readily available from official sources. The statistical indicators used have therefore been derived by combining different official sources such as the Census of Population, Labour Force Survey, Count of Claimants of Unemployment-related Benefits and the Annual Employment Survey. 1991 wards were used because of data availability. 69 3.2 The Government’s aim has been to identify locations of need (largely in terms of labour market weakness) and match these with neighbouring areas of opportunity where regional aid might have most effect in alleviating these needs. The Government used 4 indicators to identify areas with significant labour market weaknesses: employment participation rates, residence-based unemployment rates, workforce-based unemployment rates, and local dependence on manufacturing. Using these four indicators, the Government reviewed all parts of Great Britain in order to identify areas suffering high levels of unemployment or low participation in the labour market, combined with significant manufacturing activity. 3.3 As anticipated, the eligible UK population fell from 34% to 28%. In Scotland the eligible population was reduced from 64% to 49%. The following table indicates the changes at a West of Scotland level. 1 West Dunbartonshire I 100% 168% 4 Implications for North Lanarkshire 4.1 As the above table shows coverage, based on 1991 wards is reduced from full coverage to 87%. The wards which remain eligible are identified in the full report a copy of which will be made available to members through the Economic Development Unit. Annex 1. Please note that these wards are arranged alphabetically under their former District Council areas. 4.2 It is important to identify those 1991 Wards which are no longer eligible Assisted Areas. Of the wards making up the former District Councils the following have been EXCLUDED from 0 Assisted Area- 87(3)c status. Cumbemauld and Kilsyth Kildrum and Park Abronhill West and Abronhill East Queenzieburn and Kilsyth North West Banton and Kilsyth Central and East Monklands New Monklands East Motherwell Cambusnethan Newmains Strathkelvin Stepps 70 5. Steps Being Taken 5.1 The Government has not as yet invited comments on the map in the form of a further consultation. Officers from North and South Lanarkshire Council’s and the LDA are meeting to consider the strategic implications of the review. An initial analysis of companies, industries and strategic sites which may be affected in North Lanarkshire is attached at Annex 2. This analysis will expand and form the basis of any response to the Government’s proposals. 6. Recommendations 6.1 That the committee note the contents of this report and the action being taken to assess its impact in North Lanarkshire. David M Porch Director of Planning & Environment 71 Annex 1 The Governments Proposals for New Assisted Areas-Department of Trade and Industry, July 1999 72 THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSALS FOR NEW ASSISTED AREAS The Department of Trade and Industry in conjunction with The Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions The Office of the Secretary of State for Wales The Office of the Secretary of State for Scotland JULY 1999 73 The new Assisted Areas This publication The Assisted Areas are those areas of Great Britain where reports the regional aid may be granted under European Community law. Regional Selective Assistance (RSA) is the main form outcome of the of such aid in Great Britain. It is a discretionary grant, review of the awarded to secure employment opportunities and increase Assisted Areas. regional competitiveness and prosperity. On 30 July 1998 the Government announced that it would be carrying out a review of the Assisted Areas in response to new European guidelines on regional aid. The Government has carried out a comprehensive review of the Assisted Areas taking into account responses to the Consultation Document issued last July. It describes the The three month public consultation generated over 3 50 Government’s responses. A wide variety of criteria were proposed for determining the new Assisted Areas. Labour market proposals to the indicators, particularly unemployment, received the most European support. Wards were the most widely supported unit of Commission for geography to form the basis of the map. new Assisted Areas to operate The Government’s proposals are published today. They will from 1 January need the approval of the European Commission. They may therefore be subject to amendment after discussion with the 2000. Commission. The Government will announce the definitive map of the new Assisted Areas when they have been agreed with the Commission. 74 European The review of the Assisted Areas has been conducted under Commission the European Commission guidelines on regional aid published in the Official Journal of the European Regional Aid Communities on 10 March 1998 ’. These guidelines aim to Guidelines introduce a transparent and comparable regional aid system across Member States; they are part of the drive to reduce the overall level of aid to industry in the Community. The Government supports this. The guidelines require all Member States to propose new Assisted Areas to operate from 1 January 2000. The aims of the The Government is committed to creating a modem and Government’s competitive economy. Regional industrial policy has a key role to play. It brings under-utilised resources back into the regional industrial economy, enhancing employment opportunities and policy improving competitiveness. In the Competitiveness White Paper2, the Government made two commitments on regional industrial policy. It said that it would support the policy of developing forward- looking regions by: focusing support more on high-quality, knowledge-based projects which provide skilled jobs; and introducing a new Assisted Areas map, taking account of the response to the public consultation. The Government’s proposals for designating new Assisted Areas have today been submitted to the European Commission. ’ ref. 98lC 74/06 “Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy”. Cm 4176 75 The Government also stated in the Competitiveness White Paper that it would consider new measures to support the growth of smaller businesses in selected areas with particular needs. Details of the new scheme will be announced in the autumn. Results of the The review of the Assisted Areas began with a three month Public period of formal consultation. The Consultation Document was given wide distribution with over 4000 copies sent out Consultation and through publication on the Internet. The Consultation Document asked respondents to comment on areas which might be designated. It also invited views on the geographical unit and criteria which should be used in drawing up the new map. Over 350 responses were received in total. Some 244 local authorities responded, some individually and some as joint bids with neighbouring authorities or as part of a partnership bid. Submissions were also received from national bodies, as well as organisations representing specific types of area. A wide range of criteria were suggested, sometimes as specific proposals for the methodology which the UK should put forward for determining the map but more commonly as evidence of the social and economic needs of a particular area. Unemployment was the most frequently cited. For the geographical unit there was most support for the use of wards because of the scope this unit offers to target areas with severe problems masked in statistics for the wider area. There was also however sizeable support for the use of travel to work areas (TTWAs) and local authority districts. 76 Support for NUTS 3, the Commission’s preferred unit, was more limited. The Government also received comment and advice from the English Regional Development Agencies. Over 40 meetings were held with delegations who wished to underline the case for Assisted Area status for their areas. Members of Parliament, local authorities and other bodies continued to submit their views after the formal consultation period ended.
Recommended publications
  • North Yorkshire County Council Business and Environmental Services Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee 21 January 2020 P
    North Yorkshire County Council Business and Environmental Services Planning and Regulatory Functions Committee 21 January 2020 PLANNING APPLICATION ACCOMPANIED BY AN ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE VARIATION OF CONDITION NO’S 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 26, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 & 62 OF PLANNING PERMISSION REF. NO. C8/2013/0677/CPO ‘THE RELOCATION OF COLLIERY ACTIVITIES AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENERGY CENTRE TO RECOVER ENERGY FROM WASTE WITH ANCILLARY DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING OFFICES AND UTILITY USES (E.G. WORKSHOPS AND ELECTRICAL ROOMS); PARKING; A NEW ACCESS POINT AND IMPROVEMENTS TO THE EXISTING ACCESS; INTERNAL ROADS; RAILWAY SIDINGS; A WEIGHBRIDGE AND GATEHOUSE; A SUBSTATION AND TRANSFORMER COMPOUND; A NATIONAL GRID CONNECTION; PRIVATE WIRE CONNECTION TO THE COLLIERY; SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS; LIGHTING; CCTV; LANDSCAPING AND FENCING ON LAND AT KELLINGLEY COLLIERY, TURVER’S LANE, KNOTTINGLEY, WEST YORKSHIRE, WF11 8DT.’ THE PROPOSED VARIATIONS RELATE TO:- INCREASING THE CONSENTED ANNUAL THROUGHPUT OF WASTE AT THE ENERGY CENTRE, INCREASING THE TWO WAY HGV MOVEMENTS, INCREASING THE TWO WAY HGV MOVEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENERGY CENTRE, CHANGES TO ASPECTS OF THE CONSENTED DEVELOPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE PLANT SELECTION INCLUDING CHANGES TO THE TURBINE HALL, BOILER HALL, FGT PLANT AND ACC UNIT, AND CHANGES TO THE CONSENTED CONSTRUCTION PHASING TO INCLUDE THE USE OF THE FORMER KELLINGLEY COLLIERY ACCESS ON LAND AT LAND AT THE FORMER KELLINGLEY COLLIERY, TURVERS LANE, KELLINGLEY, SELBY, WF11 8DT ON BEHALF OF PEEL ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED (SELBY DISTRICT) (OSGOLDCROSS, MID SELBY, SOUTH SELBY ELECTORAL DIVISION) Report of the Corporate Director – Business and Environmental Services 1.0 Purpose of the report 1.1 To determine a planning application accompanied by an Environmental Statement for the purposes of the variation of condition no’s 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 26, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 & 62 of planning permission ref.
    [Show full text]
  • (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1997 No. 624 HOUSING, ENGLAND AND WALES The Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 Made - - - - 5th March 1997 Laid before Parliament 7th March 1997 Coming into force - - 1st April 1997 The Secretary of State for the Environment, as respects England, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 17 of the Housing Act 1996(1) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order— Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st April 1997. Designated rural areas 2. The following areas shall be designated rural areas for the purposes of section 17 of the Housing Act 1996 (the right to acquire) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (additional right to enfranchise)— (a) the parishes in the districts of the East Riding of Yorkshire, Hartlepool, Middlesborough, North East Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees specified in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of Schedule 1 to this Order and in the counties of Durham, Northumberland, North Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear and West Yorkshire specified in Parts VIII, IX, X, XI,
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Previous Minutes Were Agreed
    Ferrybridge Community Liaison Group Meeting ‘Ian Marchant’ Pavilion, Date: 17th January 2018 Location: Ferrybridge ‘C’ Power Station Date issued: Recorded by: Jade Fearon Attendees: Jade Fearon, SSE (JF) Lyndon Sutliffe, ETEX (LS) Apologies: Stephanie Gilbert, AIRE/ Brotherton PC Nick Hinde, SSE (NH) (SG) Alex Shenton, HZI (AS) Michael Wainwright, SINIAT (MW) Richard Lowe, Aecom (RL) David York, Ballast Phoenix (DY) Andrew Cable, Osgoldcross (AC) Matt Knight, FM2 (MN) Ian Foster, Environment Agency (IF) Justin Mayes, HZI (JM) David Davies, Bryam cum Sutton PC (DD) Chris Gaughan, Environment Agency (CG) Roy Wilson, representing Nigel Adams MP (RW) Harry Ellis, WMDC (HE) Jackie Dennis, Oakhill Park RA (JD) Miles Beckett, SSE (MB) Jennifer Mitchell, Byram Cum Sutton PC (JM) Keith Shenton, Pollards Fields resident (KS) Rita Stephenson, Fairburn PC (RS) Glenn Burton, Knottingley (GB) Colin Drew, MEL (CD) Glenn Burton, Knottingley (GB) Steve Davis, FM2 (SD) Don Simpson, AIRE/ Brotherton PC (DS) Graham Stokes, WMDC (GS) Ray Newton, Monk Fryston and Hillam Community Association (RN) Joanna Holland, Ballast Phoenix (JH) David Nicklin, Byram cum Sutton PC (DN) Graham Stokes, WMDC (GS) Alison Drake, Friends of Fryston Wood AD Page 1 of 4 Contact Details Jade Fearon (Community Liaison Manager) 01724 788236/ 07854 313526 (Monday to Thursday 08:30 – 17:00) Purpose of Meeting To inform the group of the status of the Ferrybridge C power station, of the Siniat gypsum facility, the operations of the Ferrybridge Multifuel 1 plant and the construction of the Multifuel 2 power station. This committee satisfies the requirement of Condition 58 of the S.36 consent for the development of the Multifuel power station.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSION STATEMENT to Improve the Quality Of
    MISSION STATEMENT To Improve the Quality of Life For Those Who Live and Work in the District Please ask for: Glenn Shelley Direct Dial No: 01757 292007 Fax No: 01757 292020 E-mail [email protected] 21 February 2011 Dear Councillor You are hereby summoned to a meeting of the Selby District Council to be held in the Civic Suite, Civic Centre, Portholme Road, Selby on Tuesday 1 March 2011 commencing at 6.00 pm. Yours sincerely Jonathan Lund Deputy Chief Executive Opening Prayers will be offered. 1 AGENDA 1. Apologies for Absence To receive apologies for absence. 2. Disclosure of Interest To receive any disclosures of interest in matters to be considered at the meeting in accordance with the provisions of Section 117 of the Local Government Act 1972, and Sections 50, 52 and 81 of the Local Government Act 2000 and the Members’ Code of Conduct adopted by the Council. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of Council held on 21 December 2010 (pages 6 to 12 attached) and the Extraordinary Council meeting on 15 February 2011 (TO FOLLOW). 4. Communications (pages 13 to 16 attached). 5. Public Questions To consider questions, if any, notice of which has been given in accordance with rule 5.20 of the Constitution. 6. Councillors’ Questions To consider questions, if any, notice of which has been given in accordance with rule 5.21 of the Constitution. 7. Committee and Board Minutes Planning Committee Green Minutes 438 to 455 15 December 2010 Pages 17 to 28 Planning Committee Minutes 484 to 493 12
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 1 Ith January 1990
    500 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 1 ITH JANUARY 1990 BRIGHTON. No. of Matter—25 of 1979. Last Day for Receiving MARMOT, Barry Alec of Higher Tor, Poundsgate, Ashburton, Proofs—Tuesday, 25th January 1990. Name of Trustee and Devon, Designer, formerly employed as an Architect (described in Address—Eckley, Neville Richard, 332 Brighton Road, South the Receiving Order as Barry Marmot). Court—TORQUAY. No. Croydon, Surrey CR2 6AJ. of Matter—15 of 1978. Last Day for Receiving Proofs—26th January 1990. Name of Trustee and Address—Gibbs, Walter B., 94 Rosebarn Lane, Pennsylvania, Exeter, Devon EX4 5DG. WILSON, Stephen Hamilton, Salesman, of 25 Pulborough Way, Middleton-on-Sea, in the county of West Sussex, and WOODRIFFE, Malcolm Robert, Salesman, of 9 Livingstone GUPTA, Dr. Kaushal Kumar, residing at 185 Hugh Street, Road, Hove, in the county of East Sussex, lately trading in Castleford, West Yorshire, formerly residing at The Bungalow, partnership under the name or style of "West Sussex Woodcraft", Marsh Lane, Byram-cum-Sutton, Knottingley, West Yorkshire at Fitzalan Road, Arundel, in the county of West Sussex. WF11 9NG carrying on business as a General Medical Formerly Company Directors. (Separate Estate of Stephen Practitioner at The Surgery, The Community Centre, St. Edwards Hamilton Wilson). Court BRIGHTON. No. of Matter—108 of Close, Byram, North Yorkshire WF11 9NT. Court— 1983. Last Day for Receiving Proofs—Wednesday, 25th January WAKEFIELD. No. of Matter—54 of 1986. Last Day for 1990. Name of Trustee and Address—Eckley, Neville, 3 Silver Receiving Proofs—31st January 1990. Trustees Name and Street, Wiveliscombe, Taunton, Somerset TA4 2PA.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for North Yorkshire County Council
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for North Yorkshire County Council Report to The Electoral Commission October 2004 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. Report no: 385 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 23 2 Current electoral arrangements 27 3 Draft recommendation 37 4 Responses to consultation 39 5 Analysis and final recommendations 41 6 What happens next? 81 Appendix A Final recommendations for North Yorkshire: Detailed mapping 83 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI No. 3962). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Byram -Cum- Sutton
    Byram -cum- Sutton Village Design Statement Supplementary Planning Document February 2012 Contents VDS O bjectives Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1 To Provide a record of local distinctiveness by The Byram Village Design Statement 1 describing the unique qualities and character of the Introducing the village 2 village. M ap 4 Character summary 5 To identify the key features and characteristics of Character A rea 1: O ld Byram 6 the local natural and built environment to be Character A rea 2: Suburban Estates 8 respected and protected from the impact of inappropriate development. Appendices A : W hat is a Village Design Statement 9 To provide design guidance for new development so and how do I use it? that change is managed and development is in B: G eneral advice for prospective 11 harmony w ith its setting. developers To achieve a higher standard of sustainable design and w here possible to enhance the local environment. To increase the involvement and influence of the local community in the planning system. Location M ap N ot to scale Reproduced from the O rdnance Survey w ith the permission of the controller of H er M ajesty’s Stationary O ffice. © Crow n Copyright. U nauthorised reproduction infringes crow n copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Selby District Council 100018656 Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1.0 O ur villages all occupy a unique position in application process, as the design context is the surrounding countryside, and have evolved clearly set out from the beginning. W here over hundreds of years to suit the needs and design is not respectful to the village, the VDS circumstances of the people w ho lived there can be used as evidence to justify the refusal of through the ages.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2009
    UK Data Archive Study Number 6255 -International Passenger Survey, 2009 Airline code Airline name Code /Au1 /Australia - dump code 50099 /Au2 /Austria - dump code 21099 /Ba /Barbados - dump code 70599 /Be1 /Belgium - dump code 05099 /Be2 /Benin - dump code 45099 /Br /Brazil - dump code 76199 /Ca /Canada - dump code 80099 /Ch /Chile - dump code 76499 /Co /Costa Rica - dump code 77199 /De /Denmark - dump code 12099 /Ei /Ei EIRE dump code 02190 /Fi /Finland - dump code 17099 /Fr /France - dump code 07099 /Ge /Germany - dump code 08099 /Gr /Greece - dump code 22099 /Gu /Guatemala - dump code 77399 /Ho /Honduras - dump code 77499 /Ic /Iceland - dump code 02099 /In /India - dump code 61099 /Ir /Irish Rep - dump code 02199 /Is /Israel - dump code 57099 /It /Italy - dump code 10099 /Ja /Japan - dump code 62099 /Ka /Kampuchea - dump code 65499 /Ke /Kenya - dump code 41099 /La /Latvia - dump code 31799 /Le /Lebanon - dump code 57499 /Lu /Luxembourg - dump code 06099 /Ma /Macedonia - dump code 27399 /Me /Mexico - dump code 76299 /Mo /Montenegro - dump code 27499 /NA /Nauru (Dump) 54099 /Ne1 /Netherlands - dump code 11099 /Ne2 /New Guinea - dump code 53099 /Ne3 /New Zealand - dump code 51099 /Ni /Nigeria - dump code 40299 /No /Norway - dump code 18099 /Pa /Pakistan - dump code 65099 /Pe /Peru - dump code 76899 /Po /Portugal - dump code 23099 /Ro /Romania - dump code 30199 /Ru /Russia - dump code 30999 /Sa /Saudi Arabia - dump code 57599 /Se /Serbia - dump code 27599 /Sl /Slovenia - dump code 27699 /So1 /Somalia - dump code 48199 /So2 /South Africa
    [Show full text]
  • WEST YORKSHIRE POST OFFICES Compiled by Ken Smith (Updated 11/2/2020)
    WEST YORKSHIRE POST OFFICES compiled by Ken Smith (updated 11/2/2020) Aberford by 1793: TADCASTER. PP.WETHERBY 1834. UDC 1842: TADCASTER. 27-5-1853 MILFORD JUNCTION. M.O.by 1855. S.B.10-3-1862. 1-7-1861 SOUTH MILFORD RSO. T.O.1870(AAU). 1-10-1878 LEEDS. Closed 16-6-2004. Ackworth 1843: UDC: PONTEFRACT. M.O.1-4-1862. S.B.2-3-1863. T.O.1870(ABJ). Closed 17-11-2008. Ackworth Moor Top 1-5-1899: MO-SB: PONTEFRACT. T.O.10-1-1934(AXT). Closed 29-5-1973. Addingham by 1823. UDC 1832: BRADFORD. By 1844 OTLEY(&1855). No.600 allocated 1844. By 5/1856 LEEDS. M.O.2-6-1856. S.B.10-3-1862. T.O.Nov.1881(ABP). 8-10-1908 ILKLEY (relocated 31-3-2015, PO Local) Adel --see TSO of LEEDS-- Airedale (TSO) May 1924: CASTLEFORD. MO-SB 6-8-1930. Rural (&1941). TSO by 1946 >Main 30-4-2013. Allerton Bywater 1882: NORMANTON. MO-SB 1-7-1882. 1-12-1891 CASTLEFORD. 1-5-1902 NORMANTON. 17-5-1904 CASTLEFORD. T.O.18-6-1912(AYR). 29-9-1941 LEEDS. 3-8-1954 CASTLEFORD. Allerton 1845: UDC: BRADFORD. MO-SB 1-10-1883. T.O.31-7-1888(ALN). >Main 27-8-2014. --Bell Dean, Allerton 1970: BRADFORD (relocated 15-5-2015, PO Local). --Sandy Lane,Allerton: 1893: rubber: BRADFORD. Closed 30-10-2004. Almondbury (TSO) 1844: UDC: HUDDERSFIELD. M.O.1-7-1868. S.B.1-10-1868. T.O.1870(ACV). Rural>TSO 1-7-1893(new tel.code HAB) >Main 22-8-2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee
    Meeting: PLANNING COMMITTEE Date: 8 JUNE 2011 Time: 4.00PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 2 To: Councillors J Cattanach, I Chilvers, J Crawford, J Deans (Chair), Mrs D Davies, D Mackay, J McCartney, Mrs E Metcalfe, C Pearson (Vice Chair), D Peart, Mrs S Ryder and S Shaw-Wright. Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Disclosures of Interest Members of the Planning Committee should disclose personal or prejudicial interest(s) in any item on this agenda. 3. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 6 April 2011 (pages 3 to 15 attached). 4. Chair’s Address to the Planning Committee 5. Planning Applications Received Reports of Business Manager – Dylan Jones 5.1 2010/0386/COU - Lowfield Road, Hillam, Leeds (page 17) 5.2 2011/0222/FUL - Swandam Wood, Sutton Lane, Byram (page 41) 5.3 2011/0303/HPA - Coldhill Farm, Coldhill Lane, Saxton, LS25 3EE (page 51) 5.4 2011/0286/HPA - Rose Villa, Castle Hill Lane, Drax, YO8 8NP (page 62) 5.5 2010/1179/FUL - 1 Chapel Lane, Riccall (page 73) 5.6 2011/0253/FUL - Selby War Memorial Hospital (page 88) 5.7 2011/0404/FUL - Selby War Memorial Hospital (page 97) Planning Committee 8 June 2011 1 6 Consultation response to North Yorkshire County Council Report of Business Manager – Dylan Jones 2010/1315/CPO – Darrington Quarries, Stubbs Lane, Criddling Stubbs (page 106) 7 Planning Appeals Decisions Reports of Business Manager – Dylan Jones (page 157) Reports for Information 1. List of Planning Applications Determined Under Delegated Powers Applications which have been determined by officers under the scheme of delegation.
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan
    Selby District Core Strategy Local Plan Adoption Version 22 October 2013 Copies of the accompanying evidence base including the Sustainability Appraisal Report and Background Papers can also be viewed on our website You may get further help from the Policy Team at: Selby District Council, Doncaster Road, Selby YO8 9FT [email protected] 01757 292034 01757 292229 If you require any further help or advice or if you need this document in a different format, for example large print, audio, Braille or in another language, please contact the Policy Team on (01757) 292034 or email [email protected] The Status of Regional Strategy (RS) and the Implications of the Localism Act 2011 At the time of ‘Publication’ of the Submission Draft Core Strategy (SDCS), the Development Plan for Selby District comprised the Regional Spatial Strategy (the Yorkshire and Humber Plan or RS), and ‘Saved’ Local Plan policies, namely Selby District Local Plan, North Yorkshire Minerals Local Plan and North Yorkshire Waste Local Plan. The Core Strategy is the first development plan document prepared by the Council as part of its new Local Development Framework (Local Plan). On adoption it replaces a number of the ‘Saved’ Selby District Local Plan policies1. On 6 July 2010 the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced the revocation of RS with immediate effect. As a result of the Secretary of State’s revocation decision, the Council reviewed the Core Strategy and the evidence base on which it is founded, and came to the conclusion that while the policies and context provided by RS were no longer applicable, the RS evidence base remains robust and relevant, particularly since the RS evidence had been subject to a process of consultation and Examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014
    Selby District DRAFT Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 Selby District Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 Selby District DRAFT Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Key Infrastructure Areas 3 Transport 3 Energy 6 Water and Drainage 7 Waste Management 9 Education 9 Adult and Community Services 10 Health 11 Emergency Services 12 Leisure 12 Community Facilities 13 Green Infrastructure 13 3. Phasing of Development 14 4. Settlement Summaries 16 5. Conclusion 19 Appendix 1 20 Planned and Proposed Infrastructure Projects Other potential un-costed infrastructure projects Selby District DRAFT Infrastructure Delivery Plan September 2014 1. Introduction 1.1 This Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) provides a resource which outlines the presence of and planned delivery of infrastructure which is relevant to the area covered by the Local Plan for Selby District. The Local Plan is not a single document but comprises the adopted Core Strategy and the emerging Sites and Policies Local Plan (when adopted). It brings together in one document the investment plans of many different organisations, in both the public and private sector. This document gives the position as of September 2014. The IDP is an evolving document and will be updated as appropriate to present the most up-to-date picture. 1.2 The IDP was initially developed to form part of the evidence base which underpins the Core Strategy. As it is a living document it is now being updated to support the emerging Sites and Policies Local Plan (or SAPP or ‘PLAN Selby’) The initial work already undertaken with IDP consultation partners will also help to inform the PLAN Selby initial consultation and help identify the required infrastructure needs to deliver the plan.
    [Show full text]