DOCSLIB.ORG

Establishment of Industrial Parks in Dnipropetrovs'k Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Establishment of Industrial Parks in Dnipropetrovs'k Region ESTABLISHMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PARKS IN DNIPROPETROVSK REGION The project’s conception. In order to discuss PROJECTS INITIATED BY REGIONAL AUTHORITIES REGION Presentation’s target OF OPPORTUNITIES Informing investors about regional authorities’ initiatives in relation to attracting investment Checking correspondence of the conception being realized to business’ expectations Involving additional partners to the project of Industrial parks’ creation Receiving additional enquiries from investors in relation to participation in the project 1 Vision of the Industrial park REGION OF OPPORTUNITIES in Dnipropetrovsk region Strategic target of the Industrial park creation in Dnipropetrovsk region – regional economy diversification The vision of the Industrial park in Dnipropetrovsk region was formed on the analysis base of the best practices of industrial parks establishment and operation: Industrial park (hereinafter referred to as IP) – is a specially organized territory for new industrial plots with the following bound criteria Proper plot Transport Engineering infrastructure Managing company for plant location infrastructure (maximum value on 1 hа) Land category – industrial land Availability of roads for cargo A specialized company managing the Electricity – 1,9 МW /h Land is leased from Residents with a transport and small remoteness Gas supply – 1,506.8 м3/h operation of the Industrial park and subsequent right to purchase from roads of national significance Potable water supply – 12 м3/h providing services to the IP residents The total area around 3 km is not less Availability of railroads on the IP Service water supply – 21 м3/h than 110 hectares territory and small remoteness from Water disposal – 24,8 м3/h freight train station Proximity to the airport Proximity to the river port 2 Planned location of Industrial parks REGION OF OPPORTUNITIES in Dnipropetrovsk region 7 Industrial parks are planned to be created in Dnipropetrovsk region by 2025 According to the analysis carried out, creation of 3 Industrial parks1 in key cities of Dnipropetrovsk region is proposed within the pilot project Plots for IP location are chosen subject to the sufficiency of infrastructure and producers' goods Pavlohrad city Dnipropetrovsk city – one of the Population2 – 110 thousand people largest industrial and transport Population density – 1 861 people/km2 Quantity of business entities: 5 thousand hubs of Ukraine Key branches: coal, engineering industry, construction engineering, chemical industry. Population2 – 1 001 thousand people Population density – 2 716 people/km2 Share in industrial production of Ukraine: 4,4% Quantity of business entities: 77 thousand Key branches: metallurgy, engineering industry, metal- working, chemical industry. Novomoskovsk 70 thousand people Pavlohrad Kryvyi Rih city – key region’s transport and industrial hub Zhovti Vody 48 thousand people Population2 – 659 thousand people Dniprodzerzhynsk Dnipropetrovsk Population density – 1 554 people/km2 234 thousand people Share of industrial production of Ukraine: 6,4% Quantity of business entities: 13 thousand Key branches: mining and smelting, engineering industry, construction engineering, sector of industrial building materials, chemical industry. Kryvyi Rih cities of the region Marhanets 49 thousand people international and national roads Ordzhonikidze 45 thousand people rail roads Nikopol international airports river ports 122 thousand people location of pilot industrial parks 1 – See more detailed description of pilot parks’ parameters in the Annex1 2 – Main Department of Statistics in Dnipropetrovsk region, on 01.12.2011 3 Increase of NPV of the project when realizing REGION OF OPPORTUNITIES on the IP territory in the Dnipropetrovsk region Within the approved Target-Oriented Strategy of Development of Dnipropetrovsk Region for the Period till 2015, one of the kea initiatives of increasing the region’s investment attractiveness is creation of specialized sites for investing. Best world practice in the matter is creation of industrial parks. Implementation of investment projects on the territory of industrial parks that are planned to be built in Dnipropetrovsk region, may allow the investor to increase NPV of the projects considerably. The reason – existence of variety of factors effecting NPV positively: Increase of NPV of the project when realizing on the IP territory in the Dnipropetrovsk Illustratory region + >5% + >20-40% + >5-15% + >5% + >5-15% NPV of the Decrease of Decrease of Reduction of terms between Opportunity to use investment current costs moments of investment comparative, geographical NPV of the project project spending starting and putting into and other advantages of the on the IP territory operation region in the Dnipropetrovsk On account of: On account of: On account of: On account of: region . Absence of necessity to invest in site . Joint use of objects of engineering, transport . Acceleration of undergoing of permitting . Large market capacity: more than 104 searching and preproject analysis as this and other infrastructure by Residents procedures through DIA support thousand enterprises of all branches of work is already carried out by regional . Reduction of administrative costs on (Dnipropetrovsk regional investment economy and more than 3 million authorities account of opportunity to use services of agency) inhabitants . Opportunity to locate production facilities on specialized company, which manages IP . Comparatively high level of real income as land lot with all engineering communications operation and provides variety of services for CIS countries – prepared within the IP creation required by IP Residents more than € 6 thousand/year . Joint use of objects of engineering, . Comparatively low taxes and mandatory . High average GDP growth up to 3-6% per transport, social and administrative contributions percentage of total year infrastructure by IP Residents commercial profits1 . Developed transport infrastructure . Exemption or remission of mandatory share . Comparatively inexpensive and qualified . Comparatively inexpensive and qualified participation (up to 10% of total estimated personnel personnel costs of object’s construction) in . Low electricity prices . Availability of sufficient quantity of human development of local infrastructure resources and other factors of production . Comparatively low prices of Ukrainian raw . Proximity to CIS and Eastern Europe sale materials and resources markets 1 – Doing Business 2012 (published by IFC and the World Bank) 4 REGION Advantages of Dnipropetrovsk region OF OPPORTUNITIES Basic region’s structural advantages for business Volynska Rivnenska Chernihivska activity on its territory: Sumska 300 km Favorable economic-geographical disposition Zhytomyrska KYIV the region is placed in central part of Ukraine and Lvivska Kyivska Poltavska Kharkivska borders upon 7 regions 1,5 million people 2,7million people Ternopilska 37 thousand 77 thousand enterprises enterprises proximity to extensive sale markets of Russia and Khmelnytska Luhanska Cherkaska Ivano- Eastern Europe Frankivska Vinnytska the region is placed at the intersection of European Zakarpatska Kirovohradska Dnipropetrovska 1 million people 3,3 million people Donetska and Asian trade routes East-West and North-South Chernivetska 25 thousand 104 thousand 4,4 million people enterprises enterprises 90 thousand enterprises Zaporizka Mykolaivska Advanced infrastructure 1,2 million people 1,8 million people Index of economic component of 33 thousand 49 thousand regions’ sustainable development enterprises enterprises Odeska Khersonska advanced motorroad network 1,1 million people 27 thousand (more than 9 thousand km) – very high enterprises vigorous railroad system (more than 3 thousand km) – high presence of 2 international airports; presence of gas-main pipeline – medium presence of a governmental waterway (Dnieper river) – low AR Crimea presence of 2 river ports – very low Availability of comparatively inexpensive qualified labour potential Extensive domestic market. Within a radius of 300 km: of the region 17 million people (40% of population of Ukraine) 7,3% of population of Ukraine live in Dnipropetrovsk region There’re more than 440 thousand businesses and training of young specialists in the region is provided by 85 higher organizations concentrated in the region which give educational institutions and 70 institutions of vocational and technical up to 50% of profits of all state’s enterprises training level of average wage in the region amounts $ 400 (300% lower than in other countries of Eastern Europe) Favorable conditions for agriculture Opportunities to purchase basic production facilities area of region's agricultural lands exceeds land availability of great number of brown-field lots which resources of number of EU countries, such as Austria, can be purchased by investor and used as base for the Netherlands and other, and amounts to 2,5 million business development hectares moderate continental climate flat ground In December 2011, Fitch Ratings gave a long-term score B/Stable Projection to the region, having admitted strong economy of the region, good budget performance and zero direct risk 5 Advantages of business activity on IP territory REGION OF OPPORTUNITIES in Dnipropetrovsk region Decrease of project’s investment spending is the result of: joint use of objects of engineering, transport infrastructure, as well as administrative and storage premises by Residents; absence of need
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2007 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 24 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CEP/133 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. 07.II.E.6 ISBN 978-92-1-116958-4 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) for countries in transition were initiated by Environment Ministers at the second “Environment for Europe” Conference in Lucerne, Switzerland in 1993. As a result, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy decided to make the EPRs a part of its regular programme. Ten years later, at the fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Kiev, 2003), the Ministers confirmed that the UNECE programme of EPRs had made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the efforts of countries with economies in transition to manage their environment. The Programme has addressed tailor-made recommendations to the Governments concerned on improving environmental management to reduce their pollution load, to better integrate environmental policies into sectoral policies and to strengthen cooperation with the international community. The Ministers also reaffirmed their support for the EPR programme as an important instrument for countries with economies in transition, and they decided that the programme should proceed with a second cycle of reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chronology
    Ukraine Nuclear Fuel Cycle Chronology Last update: April 2005 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2003-1993 1 August 2003 KRASNOYARSK ADMINISTRATION WILL NOT ALLOW IMPORT OF UKRAINE'S SPENT FUEL UNTIL DEBT PAID On 1 August 2003, UNIAN reported that, according to Yuriy Lebedev, head of Russia's International Fuel and Energy Company, which is managing the import of spent nuclear fuel to Krasnoyarsk Kray for storage, the Krasnoyarsk administration will not allow new shipments of spent fuel from Ukraine for storage until Ukraine pays its $11.76 million debt for 2002 deliveries. —"Krasnoyarskiy kray otkazhetsya prinimat otrabotannoye yadernoye toplivo iz Ukrainy v sluchaye nepogasheniya 11.76 mln. dollarov dolga," UNIAN, 1 August 2003; in Integrum Techno, www.integrum.com. 28 February 2002 RUSSIAN REACTOR FUEL DELIVERIES TO COST $246 MILLION IN 2002 Yadernyye materialy reported on 28 February 2002 that Russian Minister of Atomic Energy Aleksandr Rumyantsev and Ukrainian Minister of Fuel and Energy Vitaliy Gayduk signed an agreement under which Ukraine will buy reactor fuel worth $246 million from Russia in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Government of the Russian Federation Resolution
    THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION RESOLUTION of 1 November 2018, No 1300 MOSCOW On Measures to Implement Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 22 October 2018, No 592 Pursuant to the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 22 October 2018, No 592, On Application of Special Economic Measures in Connection with Unfriendly Acts of Ukraine Against Citizens and Legal Entities of the Russian Federation and in response to unfriendly acts of Ukraine performed contrary to international law to introduce restrictive measures against citizens and legal entities of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Russian Federation resolves: 1. To establish the blocking/freezing of non-cash means of payment, uncertificated securities and property in the Russian Federation and a ban on transferring funds (capital withdrawal) outside the Russian Federation as special economic measures applicable to individuals listed in Appendix 1 and legal entities listed in Appendix 2, as well as in regard to organisations controlled by these individuals and legal entities. 2. The federal executive authorities shall ensure the implementation of paragraph 1 of this Resolution within their autority. 3. The Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation shall ensure the balance of commodity markets and prevent the adverse impact of the special economic measures specified in paragraph 1 of this Resolution on the activities of Russian organisations. 4. To appoint the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation as the authority responsible for proposals made to the Government of the Russian Federation on: making changes to the lists given in Appendixes 1 and 2 to this Resolution; granting temporary permits to conduct certain operations in respect of certain legal entities to which special economic measures are applied; cancelling this Resolution in the event that the restrictive measures imposed by Ukraine on citizens and legal entities of the Russian Federation are lifted.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Conditions in the Dnieper River Basin
    RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS SERIES Radiological Conditions in the Dnieper River Basin Assessment by an international expert team and recommendations for an action plan IAEA SAFETY RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Under the terms of Article III of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to establish or adopt standards of safety for protection of health and minimization of danger to life and property, and to provide for the application of these standards. The publications by means of which the IAEA establishes standards are issued in the IAEA Safety Standards Series. This series covers nuclear safety, radiation safety, transport safety and waste safety, and also general safety (i.e. all these areas of safety). The publication categories in the series are Safety Fundamentals, Safety Requirements and Safety Guides. Safety standards are coded according to their coverage: nuclear safety (NS), radiation safety (RS), transport safety (TS), waste safety (WS) and general safety (GS). Information on the IAEA’s safety standards programme is available at the IAEA Internet site http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/ The site provides the texts in English of published and draft safety standards. The texts of safety standards issued in Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish, the IAEA Safety Glossary and a status report for safety standards under development are also available. For further information, please contact the IAEA at P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. All users of IAEA safety standards are invited to inform the IAEA of experience in their use (e.g. as a basis for national regulations, for safety reviews and for training courses) for the purpose of ensuring that they continue to meet users’ needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Plots for Production Facilities and Industrial Parks Placement
    LAND PLOTS FOR PRODUCTION FACILITIES AND INDUSTRIAL PARKS PLACEMENT Land plots characteristics Total area More than 1 200 ha Total number of More than 70 land plots Land plot Vilnohirsk Industrial Park Intended use Industrial lands “Pavlohrad” Area 22,3 ha Land plot Area 250 ha Mechanism of granting right Zhovti Vody Verkhnodniprovsk district Area 16 ha Pavlohrad district • Auction for tenant right. Land plots of • Recourse administrator - communal / state DNIPRO municipalities, Piatykhatky ownership, Dnipropetrovsk Regional district reserve lands Synelnykove district State Administration Kryvyi Rih district Land plots Land plots, which Sub-lease Synelnykove are leased out Area 12,6 ha Nikopol district Industrial Park Sub-lease “Pavlohrad” Industrial Park Competition for the “Kryvbas” management company. Industrial Park Land plot “Kryvbas” Nikopol Kryvyi Rih Area 3,2 ha Land plot of more Ability to create the Industrial Area 26,03 ha than 15 ha Park • Investment Map. • Request for information. 1 OFFER FOR PRODUCTION FACILITIES PLACEMENT Zhovti Vody Land plot for production facilities placement management Zhovti Vody Land plots characteristics Area 16 hа Project initiator Zhovti Vody City Council Engineering infrastructure Distance to gas distribution 16 hа Gas supply substation is 100 m Distance to the nearest Water supply connection point is 400 m • 2 km – railway station Distance from the “Zhovti Vody-2”; nearest transport • 0,2 km - distance to the corridor adjacent road. 2 OFFER FOR PRODUCTION FACILITIES PLACEMENT Vilnohirsk Land
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Public Purchasing Announcernº4(78) January 24, 2012
    Bulletin ISSN: 2078–5178 of the public purchasing AnnouncerNº4(78) January 24, 2012 Announcements of conducting procurement procedures � � � � � � � � � 2 Announcements of procurement procedures results � � � � � � � � � � � � 70 Urgently for publication � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 124 Bulletin No�4(78) January 24, 2012 Annoucements of conducting 01500 Subsidiary Company “Naftogazservice”, procurement procedures NJSC “Naftogaz Ukrainy” 2 Lunacharskoho St., 02002 Kyiv tel.: (067) 444–69–72; 01498 Subsidiary Company “Naftogazservice”, tel./fax: (044) 531–12–57; NJSC “Naftogaz Ukrainy” e–mail: [email protected] 2 Lunacharskoho St., 02002 Kyiv Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: tel.: (067) 444–69–72; www.tender.me.gov.ua tel./fax: (044) 531–12–57; Procurement subject: code 50.30.2 – services in retail trade of parts e–mail: [email protected] and equipment for cars, 2 lots Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: Supply/execution: at the customer’s address; during 2012 www.tender.me.gov.ua Procurement procedure: open tender Procurement subject: code 50.20.1 – services in maintenance and repair Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s address, reception of passenger cars, 6 lots room Supply/execution: Kyiv and Kyiv Oblast, during 2012 Submission: at the customer’s address, reception room Procurement procedure: open tender 20.12.2011 09:30 Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Ingenieurtag 2018
    ,1*(1,(857$* '(5)$.8/7b70$6&+,1(1%$8(/(.75281'(1(5*,(6<67(0(XQG '(5)$.8/7b7$5&+,7(.785%$8,1*(1,(85:(6(181'67$'73/$181* 1(6())1(7=:(5.75())(1 7$*81*6%$1' +HUDXVJHEHU 3URI'U,QJKDELO66LPRQ 'U,QJ$6WUDXE www.b-tu.de Tagungsband zu den Veranstaltungen: 4. Ingenieurtag der Fakultät Maschinenbau Elektro- und Energiesysteme und der Fakultät Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen und Stadtplanung, neseff -Netzwerktreffen 2018 Herausgeber: Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Sylvio Simon Dr.-Ing. Andrea Straub Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus-Senftenberg IKMZ, Universitätsbibliothek Platz der Deutschen Einheit 2 03044 Cottbus ISBN 978-3-940471-43-7 IURS e.V. Institut für Umwelttechnik und Recycling Senftenberg e.V. www.b-tu.de Vorwort Im November 2018 wurden die 4. Ingenieurtage an der Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus – Senftenberg begangen. Dabei fanden die Veranstaltungen an der Fakultät Maschinenbau, Elektro- und Energiesysteme am Campus Senftenberg sowie an der Fakultät Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen und Stadtplanung am Standort Campus Sachsendorf statt. Neben den Wissenschaftlern der BTU präsentierten auch eng mit der BTU verbundene Partneruniversitäten ihre wissenschaftlichen Ergebnisse. An der Fakultät Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen und Stadtplanung standen einige Vorträge unter dem Motto des Klimawandels und dessen Auswirkungen auf den Baubereich sowie angrenzende Bereich unter Beachtung verschiedener Klimabedingungen. Dabei zeigte es sich, dass es signifikante Unterschiede aber auch einige Gemeinsamkeiten hinsichtlich des notwendigen Umgangs mit den sich verändernden Umgebungsbedingungen im Bauwesen gibt. Deutschland nimmt hier eine führende Rolle für energieeffizientes Bauen ein. Die Veranstaltung führte zum breiten Konsens, dass eine Bündelung der Kompetenzen in der Wissenschaft und ein Ausbau der Zusammenarbeit global zu einer Verbesserung der Klimaschutzes in der eigenen Region führt.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLEV2 Label Updated October 2020
    Updated October 2020 GEOLEV2 Label 32002001 City of Buenos Aires [Department: Argentina] 32006001 La Plata [Department: Argentina] 32006002 General Pueyrredón [Department: Argentina] 32006003 Pilar [Department: Argentina] 32006004 Bahía Blanca [Department: Argentina] 32006005 Escobar [Department: Argentina] 32006006 San Nicolás [Department: Argentina] 32006007 Tandil [Department: Argentina] 32006008 Zárate [Department: Argentina] 32006009 Olavarría [Department: Argentina] 32006010 Pergamino [Department: Argentina] 32006011 Luján [Department: Argentina] 32006012 Campana [Department: Argentina] 32006013 Necochea [Department: Argentina] 32006014 Junín [Department: Argentina] 32006015 Berisso [Department: Argentina] 32006016 General Rodríguez [Department: Argentina] 32006017 Presidente Perón, San Vicente [Department: Argentina] 32006018 General Lavalle, La Costa [Department: Argentina] 32006019 Azul [Department: Argentina] 32006020 Chivilcoy [Department: Argentina] 32006021 Mercedes [Department: Argentina] 32006022 Balcarce, Lobería [Department: Argentina] 32006023 Coronel de Marine L. Rosales [Department: Argentina] 32006024 General Viamonte, Lincoln [Department: Argentina] 32006025 Chascomus, Magdalena, Punta Indio [Department: Argentina] 32006026 Alberti, Roque Pérez, 25 de Mayo [Department: Argentina] 32006027 San Pedro [Department: Argentina] 32006028 Tres Arroyos [Department: Argentina] 32006029 Ensenada [Department: Argentina] 32006030 Bolívar, General Alvear, Tapalqué [Department: Argentina] 32006031 Cañuelas [Department: Argentina]
    [Show full text]