Environmental Cost of Different Unit Rates David Ngo Frida Shamoun

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Cost of Different Unit Rates David Ngo Frida Shamoun LiU-ITN-TEK-G--16/042--SE Environmental cost of different unit rates David Ngo Frida Shamoun 2016-06-02 Department of Science and Technology Institutionen för teknik och naturvetenskap Linköping University Linköpings universitet nedewS ,gnipökrroN 47 106-ES 47 ,gnipökrroN nedewS 106 47 gnipökrroN LiU-ITN-TEK-G--16/042--SE Environmental cost of different unit rates Examensarbete utfört i Logistik vid Tekniska högskolan vid Linköpings universitet David Ngo Frida Shamoun Handledare Tobias Andersson Granberg Examinator Valentin Polishchuk Norrköping 2016-06-02 Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under en längre tid från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extra- ordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns det lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/ Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet - or its possible replacement - for a considerable time from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances. The online availability of the document implies a permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, to print out single copies for your own use and to use it unchanged for any non-commercial research and educational purpose. Subsequent transfers of copyright cannot revoke this permission. All other uses of the document are conditional on the consent of the copyright owner. The publisher has taken technical and administrative measures to assure authenticity, security and accessibility. According to intellectual property law the author has the right to be mentioned when his/her work is accessed as described above and to be protected against infringement. For additional information about the Linköping University Electronic Press and its procedures for publication and for assurance of document integrity, please refer to its WWW home page: http://www.ep.liu.se/ © David Ngo, Frida Shamoun Abstract Flight planning is a large part of the air traffic operations that are presently being conducted. Airlines strive to achieve the cheapest and most cost effective routes for their flights, resulting in aircraft sometimes flying longer routes in order to avoid expensive airspaces with high unit rates. The unit rates among different European airspaces can differ significantly, even between neighboring states. This issue has been an ongoing obstacle for the Swedish air navigation provider, LFV, as some airlines tend to fly over the Baltic Sea, through the Baltic countries, instead of the shorter route through Swedish airspace. These protracted routes result in extra kilometers being flown yearly, consequently consuming extra fuel, as well as imply a revenue loss to LFV and Sweden. Data of flight plans from 28th April 2014 to 3rd May 2014 have been collected and analyzed in conjuncture with literature and previous relevant studies. The study was further supplemented with data gathered through interviews with the Swedish Air Traffic Control Center at Stockholm Arlanda Airport, Scandinavian Airlines, Novair, and LFV. The conclusions of this study is that the airspace dodging behavior generate a revenue loss to LFV, totaling approximately € 032 354 million per year. Should these flights fly the shortest route between their origin and destination, which would imply flying through Swedish airspace, the before mentioned sum would mean an increase in LFV’s reported revenue from air traffic control services by 2%. Airspace dodging also results in roughly 380 408 superfluous kilometers being flown and 1 874 486 liters of additional fuel being consumed every year. Acknowledgment Firstly, we would like to thank our supervisor, Tobias Andersson Granberg, and our examiner, Valentin Polishchuk, for their invaluable support during this study, and their continuous encouragement throughout the entire Air Traffic and Logistics program at Linköping University. Secondly, we would also like to express our gratitude towards Billy Josefsson, Patrik Bergviken, and LFV for the opportunity to conduct this study, their support and enthusiasm, as well as their kindness to share their vast web of contacts within the aviation industry. Likewise, much information would have been lost without the kindness of Thomas Jönsson, Johan Dahlström, Henrik Ekstrand, and Peter Sandgren, who shared their knowledge with us. Thirdly, many thanks to Swedavia Customer Service at Stockholm Arlanda Airport for providing workspace and a bunch of encouragement. Lastly, we would like to thank Iman Pereira for his constant encouragement and ability to lift everyone’s spirits in any situation. Also, this study would not have been possible without the expert aid in Excel and data processing from Christoffer Niklasson and Johnny Waldemarsson. Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Purpose ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3. Delimitations ................................................................................................... 2 1.4. Report structure .............................................................................................. 2 2. Method Theory ....................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Quantative and qualitative data collection ................................................... 4 2.2. Literature study ............................................................................................... 4 2.3. Interviews ........................................................................................................ 4 2.3.1. Interview Medium and Execution ................................................................ 5 2.3.2. Sample Selection .......................................................................................... 6 2.4. Observation ..................................................................................................... 6 2.5. Break-Even Analysis ........................................................................................ 6 2.6. Method Implementation ................................................................................ 7 2.6.1. The Planning Phase ...................................................................................... 7 2.6.2. The Data Collection Phase ........................................................................... 8 2.6.3. The Analysis Phase ....................................................................................... 9 2.6.4. The Final Phase ............................................................................................ 9 3. Theoretical Frame of Reference ............................................................................ 11 3.1. Airspace Design .............................................................................................. 11 3.1.1. Area Navigation .......................................................................................... 11 3.1.2. Free Route Airspace .................................................................................... 12 3.2. Flight planning ............................................................................................... 13 3.2.1. Fuel Consumption ....................................................................................... 13 3.2.2. Route Charges and Unit Rates ................................................................... 14 3.3. Previous research ........................................................................................... 15 4. Description of the Current State ........................................................................... 17 4.1. LFV Air Navigation Services of Sweden ........................................................ 17 4.2. The Swedish Airspace ................................................................................... 18 4.3. Aviation Industry and Statistics ................................................................... 19 4.4. Interview with FMP Manager Thomas Jönsson ........................................... 19 4.4.1. Factors in Flight Planning .......................................................................... 20 4.4.2. Airspace Dodging ....................................................................................... 20 4.5. Interview with Scandinavian Airlines Pilot Johan Dahlström ..................... 21 4.5.1. Flight planning from a pilot’s perspective..................................................
Recommended publications
  • CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK
    CC22 N848AE HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 5 £1 CC203 OK-HFM Tupolev Tu-134 CSA -large OK on fin 91 2 £3 CC211 G-31-962 HP Jetstream 31 American eagle 92 2 £1 CC368 N4213X Douglas DC-6 Northern Air Cargo 88 4 £2 CC373 G-BFPV C-47 ex Spanish AF T3-45/744-45 78 1 £4 CC446 G31-862 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC487 CS-TKC Boeing 737-300 Air Columbus 93 3 £2 CC489 PT-OKF DHC8/300 TABA 93 2 £2 CC510 G-BLRT Short SD-360 ex Air Business 87 1 £2 CC567 N400RG Boeing 727 89 1 £2 CC573 G31-813 HP Jetstream 31 white 88 1 £1 CC574 N5073L Boeing 727 84 1 £2 CC595 G-BEKG HS 748 87 2 £2 CC603 N727KS Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC608 N331QQ HP Jetstream 31 white 88 2 £1 CC610 D-BERT DHC8 Contactair c/s 88 5 £1 CC636 C-FBIP HP Jetstream 31 white 88 3 £1 CC650 HZ-DG1 Boeing 727 87 1 £2 CC732 D-CDIC SAAB SF-340 Delta Air 89 1 £2 CC735 C-FAMK HP Jetstream 31 Canadian partner/Air Toronto 89 1 £2 CC738 TC-VAB Boeing 737 Sultan Air 93 1 £2 CC760 G31-841 HP Jetstream 31 American Eagle 89 3 £1 CC762 C-GDBR HP Jetstream 31 Air Toronto 89 3 £1 CC821 G-DVON DH Devon C.2 RAF c/s VP955 89 1 £1 CC824 G-OOOH Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 3 £1 CC826 VT-EPW Boeing 747-300 Air India 89 3 £1 CC834 G-OOOA Boeing 757 Air 2000 89 4 £1 CC876 G-BHHU Short SD-330 89 3 £1 CC901 9H-ABE Boeing 737 Air Malta 88 2 £1 CC911 EC-ECR Boeing 737-300 Air Europa 89 3 £1 CC922 G-BKTN HP Jetstream 31 Euroflite 84 4 £1 CC924 I-ATSA Cessna 650 Aerotaxisud 89 3 £1 CC936 C-GCPG Douglas DC-10 Canadian 87 3 £1 CC940 G-BSMY HP Jetstream 31 Pan Am Express 90 2 £2 CC945 7T-VHG Lockheed C-130H Air Algerie
    [Show full text]
  • SESAR JU CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2020 Abstract
    SESAR JU CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2020 Abstract This Consolidated Annual Activity Report, established on the guidelines set forth in Communication from the Commission ref. 2020/2297, provides comprehensive information on the implementation of the agency work programme, budget, staff policy plan, and management and internal control systems in 2020. © SESAR Joint Undertaking, 2021 Reproduction of text is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. For any use or reproduction of photos, illustrations or artworks, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. COPYRIGHT OF IMAGES © Airbus S.A.S. 2021, page 50; © Alexa Mat/Shutterstock.com, page 209; © Alexandra Lande/Shutterstock.com, page 215; © AlexLMX/Shutterstock.com page 177; © chainarong06/Shutterstock.com, page 220; © DG Stock/ Shutterstock.com, cover; © Diana Opryshko page 155; © Dmitry Kalinovsky/Shutterstock.com, page 56; © iStock. com/Gordon Tipene, pages 189 and 194; © iStock.com/Nordroden, page 12; © iStock.com/sharply_done, page 209; © iStock.com/sharply_done, page 18; © iStock.com/stellalevi, page 228, © lassedesignen/Shutterstock.com, page 70 © Mario Hagen/Shutterstock.com, pages 36 and 130; © Michael Penner, page 130; © NickolayV/Shutterstock. com, page 77; © Sergey Peterman/Shutterstock.com, page 10; © SESAR JU, pages 9, 15, 16, 17, 48, 49, 55,79, 86, 102,132, 134, 145, 147, 148 and 190; © SFIO CRACHO/Shutterstock.com, pages 181 and 213; © Skycolors/ Shutterstock.com, page 40; © smolaw/Shutterstock.com, page 211; © Thiago B Trevisan/Shutterstock.com, page 136; © This Is Me/Shutterstock.com, page 175; © VLADGRIN/Shutterstock.com, page 191; © Limare/Shutterstock, page 193; © Photo by Chris Smith on Unsplash, page 227 © Photo by Julien Bessede on Unsplash, page 224 © Photo by Sacha Verheij on Unsplash, page 221 © yuttana Contributor Studio/Shutterstock.com, page 66.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Fields Listed in Part I. Group (8)
    Chile Group (1) All fields listed in part I. Group (2) 28. Recognized Medical Specializations (including, but not limited to: Anesthesiology, AUdiology, Cardiography, Cardiology, Dermatology, Embryology, Epidemiology, Forensic Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Immunology, Internal Medicine, Neurological Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Ophthalmology, Orthopedic Surgery, Otolaryngology, Pathology, Pediatrics, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiology, Plastic Surgery, Preventive Medicine, Proctology, Psychiatry and Neurology, Radiology, Speech Pathology, Sports Medicine, Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Toxicology, Urology and Virology) 2C. Veterinary Medicine 2D. Emergency Medicine 2E. Nuclear Medicine 2F. Geriatrics 2G. Nursing (including, but not limited to registered nurses, practical nurses, physician's receptionists and medical records clerks) 21. Dentistry 2M. Medical Cybernetics 2N. All Therapies, Prosthetics and Healing (except Medicine, Osteopathy or Osteopathic Medicine, Nursing, Dentistry, Chiropractic and Optometry) 20. Medical Statistics and Documentation 2P. Cancer Research 20. Medical Photography 2R. Environmental Health Group (3) All fields listed in part I. Group (4) All fields listed in part I. Group (5) All fields listed in part I. Group (6) 6A. Sociology (except Economics and including Criminology) 68. Psychology (including, but not limited to Child Psychology, Psychometrics and Psychobiology) 6C. History (including Art History) 60. Philosophy (including Humanities)
    [Show full text]
  • Flygtrafiken Och Den Regionala Utvecklingen I Finland
    Flygtrafiken och den regionala utvecklingen i Finland Christian Krohn 3 november 2015 Magisteravhandling Handledare: Staffan Ringbom Institutionen för Nationalekonomi Svenska handelshögskolan Helsingfors Sammanfattning Denna avhandling studerar flygtrafikens och den regionala utvecklingens sam- band i de Finländska regionerna. Enligt tidigare forskning kan flygtrafiken ha en positiv effekt på en regions ekonomiska utveckling men relationen är dock inte fullständigt allmängiltig. I denna avhandling skiljs inrikes- och internationell- passagerartrafik åt från den totala passagerartrafiken i de flesta regressionerna. Genom denna delning erhåller vi intressanta resultat vilka kan diskuteras med Finlands flygtrafikpolitik. I avhandlingen har även flygfrakt studerats som en för- klarande variabel på den regionala utvecklingen, detta har inte gjorts i tidigare studier i Finska flygtransporten. Empiriska delen baserar sig på paneldataana- lys där Finland har delats upp i mindre regioner, först i storområden och sedan mer finfördelat i landskap som har aktiv flygtrafik. Differentierade OLS model- ler används som bas i den empiriska delen och kompletteras med WLS-modeller. Resultaten av denna undersökning visar att inrikespassagerartrafik har en signifi- kant positiv elasticitet på ca. 0,1% mot sysselsättningen samt BNP:n. Resultaten i denna studie är en aning kontroversiella jämfört med resultaten från tidigare internationell forskning för flygfrakt. Enligt resultaten i föreliggande avhandling stimulerar flygfrakt inte ekonomiska utvecklingen i Finland, tvärtom kan flygfrakt ha en tom. negativ effekt på utvecklingen. Det negativa sambandet är motsatsen till vad ledande forskningen inom detta område har kommit fram till. Resultaten av empiriska delen kan ge dels vidare grund för användningen av allmän trafik- plikt (Public Service Obligation) och andra subventioner för inrikesflygtrafiken i Finland. Nyckelord: Finland, flygfrakt, flygtrafik, flygtransport, paneldata, region, tillväxt, ut- veckling Innehåll 1Inledning 1 1.1 Problemområde..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Report Airliner Fuel System Malfunction: Incident During
    Investigation report C7/2010L Airliner fuel system malfunction: incident during an approach to Helsinki-Vantaa aerodrome on 5 July 2010 Translation of the original Finnish report OH-ATK (FCM256K) ATR 72-212A According to Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, paragraph 3.1, the purpose of aircraft accident and incident investigation is the prevention of accidents. It is not the purpose of the investigation report to apportion blame or to assign responsibility. This basic rule is also contained in the Investigation of Accidents Act, 3 May 1985 (373/85) and European Union Regulation No 996/2010. Use of the report for reasons other than improvement of safety should be avoided. Onnettomuustutkintakeskus Centralen för undersökning av olyckor Accident Investigation Board Osoite / Address: Sörnäisten rantatie 33 C Adress: Sörnäs strandväg 33 C FIN-00500 HELSINKI 00500 HELSINGFORS Puhelin / Telefon: (09) 1606 7643 Telephone: +358 9 1606 7643 Fax: (09) 1606 7811 Fax: +358 9 1606 7811 Sähköposti: [email protected] tai [email protected] E-post: [email protected] eller förnamn.slä[email protected] E-mail: [email protected] or first name.last [email protected] Internet: www.onnettomuustutkinta.fi Henkilöstö / Personal / Personnel: Johtaja / Direktör / Director Veli-Pekka Nurmi Hallintopäällikkö / Förvaltningsdirektör / Administrative Director Pirjo Valkama-Joutsen Osastosihteeri / Avdelningssekreterare / Assistant Sini Järvi Toimistosihteeri / Byråsekreterare / Assistant Leena Leskelä Ilmailuonnettomuudet / Flygolyckor
    [Show full text]
  • Airliner Census Western-Built Jet and Turboprop Airliners
    World airliner census Western-built jet and turboprop airliners AEROSPATIALE (NORD) 262 7 Lufthansa (600R) 2 Biman Bangladesh Airlines (300) 4 Tarom (300) 2 Africa 3 MNG Airlines (B4) 2 China Eastern Airlines (200) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (200) 1 Equatorial Int’l Airlines (A) 1 MNG Airlines (B4 Freighter) 5 Emirates (300) 1 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300) 5 Int’l Trans Air Business (A) 1 MNG Airlines (F4) 3 Emirates (300F) 3 Turkish Airlines (THY) (300F) 1 Trans Service Airlift (B) 1 Monarch Airlines (600R) 4 Iran Air (200) 6 Uzbekistan Airways (300) 3 North/South America 4 Olympic Airlines (600R) 1 Iran Air (300) 2 White (300) 1 Aerolineas Sosa (A) 3 Onur Air (600R) 6 Iraqi Airways (300) (5) North/South America 81 RACSA (A) 1 Onur Air (B2) 1 Jordan Aviation (200) 1 Aerolineas Argentinas (300) 2 AEROSPATIALE (SUD) CARAVELLE 2 Onur Air (B4) 5 Jordan Aviation (300) 1 Air Transat (300) 11 Europe 2 Pan Air (B4 Freighter) 2 Kuwait Airways (300) 4 FedEx Express (200F) 49 WaltAir (10B) 1 Saga Airlines (B2) 1 Mahan Air (300) 2 FedEx Express (300) 7 WaltAir (11R) 1 TNT Airways (B4 Freighter) 4 Miat Mongolian Airlines (300) 1 FedEx Express (300F) 12 AIRBUS A300 408 (8) North/South America 166 (7) Pakistan Int’l Airlines (300) 12 AIRBUS A318-100 30 (48) Africa 14 Aero Union (B4 Freighter) 4 Royal Jordanian (300) 4 Europe 13 (9) Egyptair (600R) 1 American Airlines (600R) 34 Royal Jordanian (300F) 2 Air France 13 (5) Egyptair (600R Freighter) 1 ASTAR Air Cargo (B4 Freighter) 6 Yemenia (300) 4 Tarom (4) Egyptair (B4 Freighter) 2 Express.net Airlines
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Malmin Lentoasema (EFHF)
    Helsinki-Malmin Lentoasema (EFHF), Suomen siviiliammattilentokoulutuksen keskus 1950 luvulta lähtien. Lentoasemaa pitää kehittää, ei ajaa alas, kuten Helsingin kaupunki on koko 2000-luvun yrittänyt tehdä. Maa-alueen vuokra-aika päättyy v. 2034, sitä pitää jatkaa. Uhkana on muuten siviili- ammattilentäjäkoulutuksen loppuminen Suomessa. Lare Karjalainen lentokapteeni no 63 Yli 50 vuotta Malmia palvellut majuri, tarkastuslentäjä, lennonopettaja, liikennelentäjä evp [email protected] 1 25.3.2014 Varhaishistoriasta vuodelta 1934 ja 1935 nykypäivään vuoteen 2008 on julkaistu kirja: MALMI HELSINGIN LENTOASEMA – 70 vuotta suomalaista ilmailua Seppo Sipilä – Raine Haikarainen – Hannu-Matti Wahl 2008 Kirja kertoo myös sen, että n.80 % Suomen siviiliammattilentäjistä koulutetaan Malmilla. Pari lainausta kirjasta: 1935: Sopimus valtion ja Helsingin kaupungin välillä 10.5.1935. …Sopimuksen merkittävin kohta oli sen ensimmäinen pykälä. Sen mukaan Helsingin kaupunki luovutti valtiolle korvauksetta Helsingin lentokenttäalueeksi (sisältäen tiealueen) noin 55 hehtaarin suuruisen alueen kaupungin omistamasta Tattarisuon viljelysalueesta Helsingin pitäjän Malmin kylästä noin 12 kilometrin päässä kaupungin keskustasta. Alue luovutettiin posti- ja siviili-ilma- liikenteeseen. Alue annettiin käyttöön 99 vuodeksi, ja sopimuksen voimassaolo päättyy 10. toukokuuta 2034… …Sopimukseen liittyi 17.7.1935 tehty lisäsopimus, mikä koski lentoaseman maa-alueen laajenta- mista… (Ensimmäinen lentokurssi alkoi Malmilla 27.9.1937, oppilaina Akateemisen Ilmasuojeluyhdistyksen vapaaehtoiset reservilentäjä- ylioppilaat, opettajana kapteeni S-E Siren, koulukoneena TU-163 Pilven Veikko). 2 25.3.2014 Malmin alasajo 2000-luvun alusta Hgin kaupunginhallitus halusi 2001 alussa purkaa valtion kanssa tehdyn vuoteen 2034 ulottuvan vuokrasopimuksen Malmin lentokentästä saadakseen sen asuntoalueeksi 2010 loppuun mennessä (HS 18.01.2001). Mielipidetiedusteluissa suurin osa helsinkiläisistä halusi säilyttää sen ilmailukäytössä (HS 18.01.2001), mikä toistui 15.10.2004 ja 06.01.2006 HS:n gallupkyselyissä.
    [Show full text]
  • 20161011, Unrevised House Debate
    1 Appropriation (Financial Year 2017) Bill, 2016 2016.10.11 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Tuesday, October 11, 2016 The House met at 10.30 a.m. PRAYERS [MADAM SPEAKER in the Chair] APPROPRIATION (FINANCIAL YEAR 2017) BILL, 2016 [Fifth Day] Order read for resuming adjourned debate on question [September 30, 2016]: That the Bill be now read a second time. Question again proposed. Dr. Tim Gopeesingh (Caroni East): Madam Speaker, I seek your permission under Standing Order 44(4) and 44(10). Madam Speaker: In terms of 44(10), that is with respect to your speech— [Interruption] Dr. T. Gopeesingh: Some of it I might need to. Madam Speaker:—leave is granted. With respect to the visual aid, Member I would have expected that I would have been shown before. Dr. T. Gopeesingh: Just a newspaper. All right. Madam Speaker: So that I am quite, quite certain that with your experience, you can deliver without resorting to the aid. Dr. T. Gopeesingh: All right, thank you. Madam Speaker, thank you. It is with great pleasure and, indeed, it is a privilege for me to stand this morning—I believe this is my 14th contribution to budget debates: five in the upper place and this will be my ninth in the Lower House. And, indeed, it is really a distinct honour and a privilege to be able to contribute in 2 Appropriation (Financial Year 2017) Bill, 2016 2016.10.11 Dr. T. Goopeesingh whatever little way that we can in terms of the development of Trinidad and Tobago. Let me begin by first congratulating the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnair Group Interim Report January 1 – March 31, 2011
    FINNAIR GROUP INTERIM REPORT JANUARY 1 – MARCH 31, 2011 28. huhtikuuta 2011 1 Key Facts from the First Quarter 1 Industry continues on growth track • Air Traffic on the rise: – IATA estimate for the capacity growth 6%* in 2011 – Weak Net Profit Margins expected (1.4 %) • External disturbances and overcapacity have a negative effect on the load factors, the fuel cost increase cannot be transferred to ticket prices • Finnair Q1 traffic +12.1% (ASK): – Asian traffic grew 20.2% (ASK) – Asian traffic revenue +23% – Global corporate sales +19%, outside Finland +43% • Finnair Passenger load factor 72.6% – Q4 2010 Strike continued to have an effect on Asian leisure demand during Q1 – Events in Japan , Middle East and Africa affected strongly on the Q1 sales • Cargo continued to develop positively, revenue up by 57% * compared with previous year Traffic Region Development Q1 2011 vs. Q1 2010 North Atlantic Europe Asia ASK 15,1 % ASK 9,7 % ASK 20,2 % RPK 9,6 % RPK -0,8 % RPK 5,0 % PLF% -3,7 %-p PLF% -6,4 %-p PLF% -10,7 %-p Traffic revenue 18,8 % Traffic revenue 0,4 % Traffic revenue 22,9 % Leisure traffic Domestic Total ASK -3,1 % ASK 20,0 % ASK 12,1 % RPK -3,8 % RPK 5,1 % RPK 1,7 % PLF% -0,7 %-p PLF% -7,6 %-p PLF% -7,4 %-p Traffic revenue -2,3 % Traffic revenue 9,6 % Traffic revenue 9,4 % Cargo ATK 62,4 % RTK 42,5 % CLF% -8,7 %-p Traffic revenue 57,0 % 2 We are Investing in Growth and Partnerships • Singapore route launch in May 2011; outlook positive • We are developing our cooperation in feeder fraffic and cargo to enable growth and to increase
    [Show full text]
  • Air Traffic Delay in Europe
    EUROCONTROL Trends in Air Traffic l Volume 2 A Matter of Time: Air Traffic Delay in Europe Acknowledgements The idea for this study came from Tim Guest, Manager of the EUROCONTROL Central Office for Delay Analysis, who expressed concerns that outside of a few specialists in Air Traffic Management, there was a relatively poor understan- ding of air traffic delay. With the cooperation of the EDAG, the supervising group for CODA, and particularly with the help of the Association of European Airlines (AEA) and the International Air Carrier Association (IACA), this document has been developed to help explain delay and to eliminate misunderstandings and misconceptions. Tim Guest was the principal author of this study and the force behind its production; it was his encyclopedic knowledge of the sub- ject that we have sought to capture in this volume. Bo Redeborn, EUROCONTROL Director of ATM Strategies approved the further development of this series of studies into air traffic market sectors with the objective of increasing the depth of knowledge. I am grateful to him for his support and encouragement. Thanks go to the CODA team, Tony Leggat, Catherine Yven and Yves De Wandeler for their considerable contributions and support. We are grateful also to EUROCONTROL’s External and Public Relations Unit for their help in the design and publication of the document. Thanks go also to a number of people who reviewed the document, suggested changes and helped in the proof reading. Notable among these were Terry Symmans of the EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre and Sue Lockey from AEA. Any remaining errors are our own.
    [Show full text]