Passenger Cases. --Smith V. Turner., 48 US
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JANUARY TERM, 1849. 8S Passenger Cases.-Smith v. Turner. motion of Mr. Inge, of counsel for the defendants in error, to dismiss this writ of error for the want ofjurisdiction. On con- sideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. GEORGE SMITH, PLAINTIFF IN .ERROR, V. WILLIAM TuINEE, HEALTH- COMMISSIONER OF THE PORT OF Naw YORK. JAMES NoRRIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE CITY OF BOSTON. Statutes of the States of New York and Massachusetts, imposing taxes upon alien passengers arriving in the ports of those States, declared to be contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States, and therefore null and void. Inasmuch as there was no opinion of the court, as a court, the reporter refers the reader to the opinions of the judges for an explanation of the statutes and the goints in which they conffilcted..with the Constitution aifd laws of the United tates. THESE were kindred cases, and were. argued together. They were both brought up to this court by writs of. error issued un- der the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act; the case of Smith v. Turner being brought from the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors of the State of New' York, and the case of Norris v. The City of Boston from, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. The opinions of. the justices of this court connect the two casds so closely, that the same course will be pursued in reporting them which was adopted in the License Cases. .Many of'the arguments of counsel relate indiscriminately to both. A statement of each case will, therefore, be made separately, and the argu-" ments and opinions be placed in their appropriate class, as far as practicable. SMITH v. TuR.NER In the first volume of the Revised Statutes of New York, pages 445, 446, title 4, will be found the law of the State whose constitutionality was brought into question in this case., The law relates- to the marine hospital, then established upon Staten Island, and under the superintendence of a physician and certain commissioners of health. The seventh section provides, that "1the health-commissioner. shall demand and be entitled to receive, and in'case of neglect or refusal to pay shall sue for and recover, in his name of office, 2SUPREME COURT. Passenger Cases. -Smith v. Turner. the following sims from the ,master of every vessel that phall arrive in the port of New York, viz.: " 1.. From the master of every vessel from a foreign port, for himself and each cabin passenger, one dollar and fifty cents; for each steerage passenger, mate, sailor, or mariner, one dollar. "2. From the master of each coasting-vessel, for each per- son on board, twenty-five cents; but no coasting-vessel from the States of tiew Jersey, Connecticut, and Rhode Island shall pay for more than one voyage in each -month, computing from the first voyage in each year." The eighth section provides that the money so received shall be denominated- " hospital moneys." And the ninth. section gives "each master paying hospital moneys a right to demand and recover from each person the sum paid on his account." The tenth section declares7.any master who shall fail to make the above payments within twenty-four hours after the arrival of his vessel in the port shall forfeit the sum of one hundred dollars. By the eleventh. section, the 6ommissioners of health are required to account annually to the Comptroller of the State for all moneys received by them for the use of .the marine hos- pital; "and if such moneys.shall in any one year 6xceed the sum necessary to defray the expenses of their trust, including their own salaries, and exclusive of such expenses as are to be. borne and paid as a part of the contingent charges of the city of New York, they shall pay over such surplus to the treasurer of -the Society for the Reformation of Juvenile Delinquents in the city of New York, for the use of the society." Smith was master of the British ship Henry Bliss, which ar- rived at New York in June, 1841, and landed two hundred and ninety-five' steerage- passengers. Turner, the health-commis- sioner,' brought an action against him for the sum of $295. To this the following demurrer was filed, viz.: - "And the said George Smith, defendant in this suit,'by ?J. R. Zabriskie, his attorney, comes and defends the wrong and injury, when, &c., and says that the said declaration, and the matters therein contained, in manner and form as the same are above stated and set forth, are not sufficient in law for the said plaintiff to have or maintain his aforesaid action. thereof against the said defendant, and that the said defendant is not bound by law to answer the same ; for that the statute of this State, in said declaration referred, to, in pursuance -of *hich the said plaintiff claims to be entitled to demdnal and receive from the said dtfendant the sum of money in said declaration named, is contrary to the Constitution of the United States, and void, and this he is ready to verify." The plaiiitiff joined in demurrer, and the Supreme Court JANUA.RY TERM,"1849. 286 Passenger Cases.-Norris v. City of.Bostan. of Judicature of the People of the State of New York over- ruled the demurrer, and gave judgment for the plaintiff, on the 28th of September, 1842. The cause was carried, by writ of error, to the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Cor- Irection of Errors, which affirmed the judgment of the court below in October, 1843. A writ of error, issued under .the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary Act, brought the case up to this court. NoRis ,v. Crm or BoSTON. Norris was an inhabitant of St. 'John's, in the Province of New Brunswick and kingdom of Great Biftain. --He .wa %the master of a vessel, and arrived in the port of Boston.in -June, 1837, in command of a schooner belonging to the port of St. John's, having on board nineteen alien lasseqgers. Prior ;to landing, he was compelled, by virtue of a law 6f Massachusetts which is set forth in the special verdict of the jury, to pay the sum of two dollars for each passenger to the city of Boston. At the October term, 1837, of the Court of -Common.Pleas, Norris brought a suit against the city of Boston, to recover this money, and was nonsuited. The cause was carried up -to -the Supreme Judicial Court, where it was tried in November, -1S42. The jury found a special verdict as follows: -:- "The jury find, that at a session of the legislature -of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, holden at the city, of Boston, on the 20th of April, 1837, the following law was passed -and enacted, to wit, ' An act relating to alien passengers.' ",' Sec. 1st. When any vessel shall arrive at any port or har- bour within this State, from any port or place without the same, with alien passengers on board, the officer or officers whom the mayor and aldermen of the city, or the-selectmen of the-town, where it is proposed to land such passengers, are hereby au- thorized and required to appoint, shall go on board such vessels and examine into the condition of said passengers. "'Sec. 2d. If, on such examination, there shall be found among said passengers any lunatic, idiot, maimed, aged, or in- firm person, incompetent, in the opinion of the officer so exam- ining, to maintain themselves, or who have been paupers in any other coumtry, no such alien passenger shall be permitted to-land until the master, owner, consignee, or agent of such vessel shall' have given to such city or town a bond in the sum of one thousand dollars, with good and sufficient security, that no such lunatic or indigent passenger shall become a city, town, or State charge within ten years from the date of ;aid bond. 286 SUPREME COURT. Passenger Cases.-Norris v. City of Boston. " 1Sec. 3d. No alien passenger, other than those spoken of in the preceding section, shall be permitted to land until the mnas- ter, owner, consignee, or agent of such vessel shall pay to the regularly appointed boarding officer the sum -of two dollars for each passenger so landing; and the money so collected shall be paid into the treasury of the city or town, to be appropriated as the city or town may direct for the support of foreign paupers. "'Sec. 4th. The officer or officers required in the first section of this act to be appointed by the mayor and aldermen, or the selectmen, respectivelyi shall, from time to time, notify the pilots of the port of said city or town of the place or places where the said examination is made, and the said pilots shall be required to anchor all such vessels at the place so appointed, and require said vessels there to remain till such examination shall be made; and any pilot who shall refuse or neglect to perform the duty imposed upon him by this section, or who shall through negligence or design permit any alien passengers to land before such examination shall be had, shall forfeit to the city or town a sum not less than fifty nor more than two thousand dollars. "' Sec. 5th. The provisions of this act shall not apply to any vessel coming on shore in distress, or to any alien passengers taken from any wreck when life is in danger.