DOCSLIB.ORG

National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Shark Fisheries in India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ii BOBLME-2015-Ecology-65 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal and development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The BOBLME Project encourages the use of this report for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts or the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the BOBLME Project Regional Coordinator. BOBLME contract: LOA/RAP/2012/70 For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as: BOBLME (2015) National Plan of Action for conservation and management of shark fisheries in India. BOBLME-2015-Ecology-65 ii 1 National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Shark Fisheries in India 2 Preface 4 The development of the ‘National Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Shark Fisheries in India’ or in short ‘NPOA-Sharks India’ has gone through a long and arduous process, at times frustrating but on the whole a very satisfying and useful journey for the Bay of Bengal Programme Inter- Governmental Organisation (BOBP-IGO). The seeds of the NPOA-Sharks were sown in the Third Meeting of the Governing Council of the BOBP-IGO, held in Malé, Maldives in May 2007. As directed by the Governing Council, the BOBP-IGO Secretariat initiated discussions involving the BOBP-IGO member-countries (Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka) and organized two regional consultations- the first in Beruwala, Sri Lanka in March 2008 and the second in Kulhudhuffushi in Maldives in August 2009. These two consultations helped in better understanding the national scenarios as also in building a regional picture of shark fisheries in the Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem. The second regional consultation brought in the newly established Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystem (BOBLME) Project as a partner in the initiative. This partnership also allowed the BOBLME Project to partially fund the preparation of NPOA-Sharks India, which is duly acknowledged. Sharks occupy an important place in the marine fisheries sector of India. The exalted position that tigers occupy on land, sharks have it in the seas. Fishers consider them with awe. Shark fishing has historical roots and the fishery has served both as a source of food and livelihoods for a large section of the coastal population in the country. In many places shark meat, both fresh and dried/salted is considered a delicacy. Indian cusine books contain many such preparations. The pivotal role of sharks in the marine ecosystem and food web is also well-recognized and acknowledged by the fisher community and other concerned stakeholders. As evident from this document, except the Thoothoor fishers from Kanyakumari district of southern Tamil Nadu and fishers from Veraval, Gujarat, shark landings by and large take place as by-catches and not through targeted fishing. The aforementioned two groups of dedicated shark fishers have also in the recent years changed their strategy. The Thoothoor fishers are now targeting tunas and tuna-like species. In Veraval, after the ban on catching of whale shark (Rhincodon typus), the focus has moved from sharks to other commercial species. Consequently, shark landings have also drastically reduced in Veraval and its neighbouring areas. However, in certain other areas, particularly in Andhra Pradesh, shark landings as by-catch are increasing, which is becoming a matter of concern. Addressing the multi-dimensional requirements of an NPOA, especially bearing in mind the sub-continental proportions of India and a gigantic fisheries sector set in a tropical multi-gear, multi-species fisheries, necessitated involvement and cooperation of a large number of stakeholders, ranging from government agencies to non-governmental and community-based organizations and fisher associations/cooperatives. Their engagement in the process also took this exercise to a series of stakeholder consultations, field-level assessments and personal discussions. The underlying objective of this extensive engagement was first to give the stakeholders a sense of ‘ownership’ of the NPOA, as and when it 5 was ready for implementation, and second to make the fishers active partners and a part of the solution of this complex task. The NPOA-Sharks India has been attempted as a comprehensive document providing if not all, most of the relevant information to the practitioners of marine fisheries in the country. In other words, our attempt has been to provide a ‘wholesale’ coverage to the issues concerning the plan of action. The report provides a succinct description of the Indian marine fisheries sector, which is essential in the context of sharks being predominantly caught as ‘by-catch’ and not through targeted fishery. This section then flows into the ‘Assessment of Shark Fisheries in India’, which can also be considered as the backbone of the NPOA-Sharks. This section assiduously analyses the various facets of shark fisheries in the country and inter alia covers the global and national context; biological attributes and status of shark fisheries; international binding and non- binding legal frameworks applicable to migratory and straddling fish stocks and the soft laws that profess responsible fisheries; the national legal framework and applicable policies; trade and related economic aspects; stakeholder dimensions and their viewpoints; research and developmental inputs; and a ‘Bibliography’ of publications on various aspects of shark fisheries in India. The concluding section is the ‘operational’ part of the report - the National Plan of Action - Sharks, which also includes the ‘Implementation Plan’ for consideration of the Government. On the whole, the report makes a humble attempt to enhance our understanding and knowledge on shark fisheries in India and also on those who derive their livelihoods from this resource. We are confident that this report will allow the Government of India to take considered decisions with regard to shark fisheries and conservation in the country. The making of this document enlisted support from a range of organizations/ agencies, fisher associations/cooperatives and individuals. To begin with, we made extensive use of published data of the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) and the Fishery Survey of India (FSI). In this regard, FSI deserves special thanks. The Institute made available its raw data on hooking rates and catch per unit effort from the longlining and trawling exploratory surveys, covering the period 1985 – 2014. This valuable data has helped in locating the hotspots of shark fishery in the Indian EEZ, which would be useful in implementing many management measures in the times to come. The Thoothoor-based Association of Deep Sea Going Artisanal Fishermen (ADSGAF) has been a strong collaborator of the BOBP-IGO and provided unstinted support at all stages of this interesting journey. The Association spearheaded the State-level Consultations, bringing in a range of stakeholders – from fishers to politicians to sadhus and priests – offering their unequivocal support towards conservation of shark fisheries in the Indian waters. Many individuals also joined hands with us in this work, the list is long and thus the names are not being mentioned here. The NPOA-Sharks India is largely based on secondary data/information. Due care has been exercised while quoting facts and figures from published sources. Text or data borrowed from such documents has also been cited and duly acknowledged. However, omissions if any, would be solely on account of oversight or would have crept in inadvertently. 6 The NPOA-Sharks India is a living document, a dynamic plan that can be re- visited and revised as and when need arises. It is suggested that after five years of its implementation life, the NPOA-Sharks India may be subjected to a formal revision, after reviewing the progress of implementation against the agreed performance indicators, and also taking into account the other developments in the sector. As the long process has now reached its concluding phase and as I write this Preface, it can be said with great satisfaction that the NPOA-Sharks India has been developed in a participatory mode, with the active engagement of a range of stakeholders. It charts a road map for the country to begin implementing the various components of the Plan, and in the process ensuring sustainability of shark populations in the Indian EEZ. Chennai, India Yugraj Singh Yadava 09 December 2015 Director, BOBP-IGO 7 Executive Summary 8 The NPOA-Sharks India is the first step towards ensuring continuity of ecological services supported by sharks and also its economic services. It is also a step towards meeting India’s commitment to the 1973 Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); 1979 Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS); the 1982 United Nations Law of the Sea (UNCLOS); the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD); the 1995 United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement relating to Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (UNFSA); the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF); the 1999 International Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Sharks (IPOA-Sharks); and the resolutions of the regional fisheries bodies, the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC); BOBP-IGO and BOBLME. India is one of the largest marine fishing nations with 8,118 km of coastline and 2.02 sq. km of Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The marine fisheries potential of the country is 4.41 million metric tonnes (mmt), against which the current production level (2012) is estimated at 3.94 mmt.
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016

    Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016

    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
  • Shark Cartilage, Cancer and the Growing Threat of Pseudoscience

    Shark Cartilage, Cancer and the Growing Threat of Pseudoscience

    [CANCER RESEARCH 64, 8485–8491, December 1, 2004] Review Shark Cartilage, Cancer and the Growing Threat of Pseudoscience Gary K. Ostrander,1 Keith C. Cheng,2 Jeffrey C. Wolf,3 and Marilyn J. Wolfe3 1Department of Biology and Department of Comparative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; 2Jake Gittlen Cancer Research Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and 3Registry of Tumors in Lower Animals, Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Sterling, Virginia Abstract primary justification for using crude shark cartilage extracts to treat cancer is based on the misconception that sharks do not, or infre- The promotion of crude shark cartilage extracts as a cure for cancer quently, develop cancer. Other justifications represent overextensions has contributed to at least two significant negative outcomes: a dramatic of experimental observations: concentrated extracts of cartilage can decline in shark populations and a diversion of patients from effective cancer treatments. An alleged lack of cancer in sharks constitutes a key inhibit tumor vessel formation and tumor invasions (e.g., refs. 2–5). justification for its use. Herein, both malignant and benign neoplasms of No available data or arguments support the medicinal use of crude sharks and their relatives are described, including previously unreported shark extracts to treat cancer (6). cases from the Registry of Tumors in Lower Animals, and two sharks with The claims that sharks do not, or rarely, get cancer was originally two cancers each. Additional justifications for using shark cartilage are argued by I. William Lane in a book entitled “Sharks Don’t Get illogical extensions of the finding of antiangiogenic and anti-invasive Cancer” in 1992 (7), publicized in “60 Minutes” television segments substances in cartilage.
  • Shark and Ray Products in the Processing Centres Of

    Shark and Ray Products in the Processing Centres Of

    S H O R T R E P O R T ALIFA BINTHA HAQUE BINTHA ALIFA 6 TRAFFIC Bulletin Vol. 30 No. 1 (2018) TRAFFIC Bulletin 30(1) 1 May 2018 FINAL.indd 8 5/1/2018 5:04:26 PM S H O R T R E P O R T OBSERVATIONS OF SHARK AND RAY Introduction PRODUCTS IN THE PROCESSING early 30% of all shark and ray species are now designated as Threatened or Near Threatened with extinction CENTRES OF BANGLADESH, according to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. This is a partial TRADEB IN CITES SPECIES AND understanding of the threat status as 47% of shark species have not CONSERVATION NEEDS yet been assessed owing to data deficiency (Camhi et al., 2009;N Bräutigam et al., 2015; Dulvy et al., 2014). Many species are vulnerable due to demand for their products Alifa Bintha Haque, and are particularly prone to unsustainable fishing practices Aparna Riti Biswas and (Schindler et al., 2002; Clarke et al., 2007; Dulvy et al., Gulshan Ara Latifa 2008; Graham et al., 2010; Morgan and Carlson, 2010). Sharks are exploited primarily for their fins, meat, cartilage, liver oil and skin (Clarke, 2004), whereas rays are targeted for their meat, skin, gill rakers and livers. Most shark catch takes place in response to demand for the animals’ fins, which command high prices (Jabado et al., 2015). Shark fin soup is a delicacy in many Asian countries—predominantly China—and in many other countries (Clarke et al., 2007). Apart from the fins being served in high-end restaurants, there is a demand for other products in different markets and by different consumer groups, and certain body parts are also used medicinally (Clarke et al., 2007).
  • Download Book (PDF)

    Download Book (PDF)

    e · ~ e t · aI ' A Field Guide to Grouper and Snapper Fishes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Family: SERRANIDAE, Subfamily: EPINEPHELINAE and Family: LUTJANIDAE) P. T. RAJAN Andaman & Nicobar Regional Station Zoological Survey of India Haddo, Port Blair - 744102 Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Rajan, P. T. 2001. Afield guide to Grouper and Snapper Fishes of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. (Published - Director, Z.5.1.) Published : December, 2001 ISBN 81-85874-40-9 Front cover: Roving Coral Grouper (Plectropomus pessuliferus) Back cover : A School of Blue banded Snapper (Lutjanus lcasmira) © Government of India, 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, re-sold, hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher'S consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable. PRICE Indian Rs. 400.00 Foreign $ 25; £ 20 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, 234/4, AJe Bose Road, 2nd MSO Building, (13th Floor), Nizam Palace, Calcutta-700 020 after laser typesetting by Computech Graphics, Calcutta 700019 and printed at Power Printers, New Delhi - 110002.
  • Unusual Landing of Blue Shark

    Unusual Landing of Blue Shark

    Mar. Fish. Infor. Serv., T & E Ser., No. 233, 2017 23 A report on morphological abnormality in Scylla serrata R. Ratheesh Kumar, Swapnil S. Tandel, Vaibhav D. Mhatre and Veerendra Veer Singh Mumbai Research Centre of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai e-mail: [email protected] Morphological abnormalities most commonly reported in crabs are alterations in carapace (mainly number and shape of antero-lateral teeth), chelipeds, walking legs and shape of the abdomen. Uran, a fishing village in Raigad district of Maharashtra, supports a good fishery of Scylla serrata commonly known as giant mud crab, found in the coastal estuarine and mangrove areas. During a survey conducted in the intertidal zone on 21st August 2017, a live juvenile of S. serrata was observed with a bifurcated claw. The crab was a male with 56 mm carapace width. Its right cheliped showed two claws articulating separately from the carpus and second claw emerged from the posterior side of the carpus. Merus of the right cheliped also showed strong rows of spines on both sides unlike Abnormal mud crab in a normal crab. The two claws were well developed to ionising radiations and toxins (Klein and Koomen. and resembled each other, except a slight difference 1993, Crustaceana, 64(1): 122-126), or due to in size. extreme environmental conditions (Pandourski and The exact reason for the present abnormality is Evtimova, 2009, Acta. Zool Bulg., 61(1): 55-67). unknown. Certain authors have concluded that such Possible reason for the present abnormality may be abnormalities may be due to injuries or accidents due to injuries or accident in the chelate leg and (Shelton et al., 1981, J.
  • Field Identification Guide to the Sharks and Rays of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden

    Field Identification Guide to the Sharks and Rays of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden

    FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES ISSN 1020-6868 FIELD IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE SHARKS AND RAYS OF THE RED SEA AND GULF OF ADEN PERSGA FAO SPECIES IDENTIFICATION GUIDE FOR FISHERY PURPOSES FIELD IDENTIFICATION GUIDE TO THE SHARKS AND RAYS OF THE RED SEA AND GULF OF ADEN by Ramón Bonfil Marine Program Wildlife Conservation Society Bronx, New York, USA and Mohamed Abdallah Strategic Action Program Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Jeddah, Saudi Arabia FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2004 iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT This document was prepared under the coordination of the Species Identification and Data Programme of the Marine Resources Service, Fishery Resources and Environment Division, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). This field guide is largely based on material prepared for training courses on elasmobranch identification delivered in the region by the first author, and promoted by the Regional Organization for the Conservation of the Environment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (PERSGA), as an activity of PERSGA’s Strategic Action Programme (SAP) towards capacity building and technical assistance in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden region. Printing was supported by Japanese Government funds. The increasing recognition of the significance of sharks and batoid fishes as ecosystem health indicators, as well as their particular importance in exploited ecosystems in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, have been key considerations to promote the preparation of this Field Guide. Furthermore, in recent years the reported catches of elasmobranchs in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden showed a marked increase.
  • Basic Needs of 39 Coastal Fishing Communities in Kanniyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India Bay of Bengal Programme Bobpimm/1

    Basic Needs of 39 Coastal Fishing Communities in Kanniyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India Bay of Bengal Programme Bobpimm/1

    BASIC NEEDS OF 39 COASTAL FISHING COMMUNITIES IN KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, INDIA BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME BOBPIMM/1 Mimeo Series BASIC NEEDS OF 39 COASTAL FISHING COMMUNITIES IN KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, INDIA A SURVEY TO INVESTIGATE AND PRIORITISE PROBLEMS REGARDING SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE by ReneJ.C.Verduijn Associate Professional Officer (Fishery Resource Economist) Bay ofBengalProgramme BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME, Chennai, India 2000 ii Preface This document describes a survey of the basic needs of 39 coastal fishing communities of Kanniyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, India, as perceived by the communities. The survey investigated and prioritized the communities’ needs for basic services such as water,education and health care. The survey was a co-operative effort ofthe Tamil Nadu Department ofFisheries, the Coastal Peace and DevelopmentCommittee of the Kottar Diocese, and the Bay ofBengal Programme (FAO/UN). The survey was carried out during the first half of 1998 by two local enumerators in each village selected by the Coastal Peace and Development Committee. All the enumerators were together imparted training for a day by the BOBP on the conduct of interviews, and given questionnaires. The enumerators conducted group interviews with fisherfolk of the 39 communities, both men and women, about the status of local services. This document details the findings of the survey and the comments by the respondents. It is hoped that these are founduseful by various governmentagencies and the church in improving the status of basic services and infrastructure in coastal areas of Kanniyakumari district. The survey, and this report of the survey, are part of the BOBP’s effort in co-operation with the TamilNadu Department of Fisheries to improve fisheries management in Kanniyakumari district.
  • Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan2)

    Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan2)

    MALAYSIA NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SHARK (PLAN2) DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-BASED INDUSTRY MALAYSIA 2014 First Printing, 2014 Copyright Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Department of Fisheries Malaysia. Published in Malaysia by Department of Fisheries Malaysia Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia, Level 1-6, Wisma Tani Lot 4G2, Precinct 4, 62628 Putrajaya Malaysia Telephone No. : 603 88704000 Fax No. : 603 88891233 E-mail : [email protected] Website : http://dof.gov.my Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-983-9819-99-1 This publication should be cited as follows: Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014. Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2), Ministry of Agriculture and Agro- based Industry Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 50pp SUMMARY Malaysia has been very supportive of the International Plan of Action for Sharks (IPOA-SHARKS) developed by FAO that is to be implemented voluntarily by countries concerned. This led to the development of Malaysia’s own National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark or NPOA-Shark (Plan 1) in 2006. The successful development of Malaysia’s second National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2) is a manifestation of her renewed commitment to the continuous improvement of shark conservation and management measures in Malaysia.
  • Review of Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes

    Review of Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme 14 TH MEETING OF THE CMS SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bonn, Germany, 14-17 March 2007 CMS/ScC14/Doc.14 Agenda item 4 and 6 REVIEW OF MIGRATORY CHONDRICHTHYAN FISHES (Prepared by the Shark Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission on behalf of the CMS Secretariat and Defra (UK)) For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. REVIEW OF MIGRATORY CHONDRICHTHYAN FISHES IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Shark Specialist Group March 2007 Taxonomic Review Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes Contents Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................iii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods, definitions and datasets ............................................................................................. 2 2.1 Methodology....................................................................................................................
  • Jeee|<Ekeà Efjheesì&

    Jeee|<Ekeà Efjheesì&

    Yeejleer³e ceeeqlm³ekeÀer meJex#eCe Jeee|<ekeÀ efjheesì& ANNUAL REPORT 2013-14 Yeejleer³e ceeeqlm³ekeÀer meJex#eCe Yeejle mejkeÀej ke=Àef<e ceb$eeue³e (heMegheeueve, [s³ejer Je ceeeqlm³ekeÀer efJeYeeie) cegbyeF& FISHERY SURVEY OF INDIA Govt. of India Ministry of Agriculture (Deptt. of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries) Mumbai Deiemle /August 2014 Jeee|<ekeÀ efjheesì& 2013-14 mebkeÀueve Þeer yeehet Sce. jeTle mebheeokeÀ Þeer heer. meer. jeJe SJeb [e@. DeMegbceeve oeme eEnoer DevegJeeo Þeerceleer ceerje Jesuuesve jepeerJe meef®eJeer³e mene³elee efJeMeeue kesÀ. Kejele Compiled by Shri Bapu. M. Raut Edited by Shri P. C. Rao and Dr. Ansuman Das Hindi translation Smt. Meera Vellan Rajiv Secretarial assistance Shri Vishal Kharat He´keÀeMekeÀ / Published by Þeer he´sce®evo, ceneefveosMekeÀ (he´Yeejer) Shri Premchand, Director General (I/C) Yeejleer³e ceeeqlm³ekeÀer meJex#eCe Fishery Survey of India yeesìeJeeuee ®eWyeme&, mej heer. Sce. jes[, cegbyeF&-400 001 Botawala Chambers, Sir P. M. Road, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 HewÀkeÌmeë 022-22702270, HeÀesveë 022-22617144/22617145 Fax: 022-22702270 ; Phone: 022-22617144 / 22617145 ìsueskeÌmeë 011-85778, kesÀyeueë ceervee E-mail: [email protected] JesyemeeF&ìëhttp//www.fsi.gov.in Website: http//www.fsi.gov.in Annual Report 2013 -14 Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 4 2. The Mandate of Fishery Survey of India 5 3. Operational Bases and Survey Vessels 6 4. Marine Fishery Resources, Assessment & Research Projects 4.1 Demersal Resources Survey & Monitoring West coast 7 East coast 18 4.2 Oceanic tuna Resource Survey Projects 29 5. Physical Target & Achievements 34 6. Vessel-wise Catches & Values 35 7.
  • Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal

    Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal

    State of Oregon The ORE BIN· Department of Geology Volume 34,no. 10 and Mineral Industries 1069 State Office BI dg. October 1972 Portland Oregon 97201 FOSSil SHARKS IN OREGON Bruce J. Welton* Approximately 21 species of sharks, skates, and rays are either indigenous to or occasionally visit the Oregon coast. The Blue Shark Prionace glauca, Soup-fin Shark Galeorhinus zyopterus, and the Dog-fish Shark Squalus acanthias commonly inhabit our coastal waters. These 21 species are represented by 16 genera, of which 10 genera are known from the fossi I record in Oregon. The most common genus encountered is the Dog-fish Shark Squalus. The sharks, skates, and rays, (all members of the Elasmobranchii) have a fossil record extending back into the Devonian period, but many major groups became extinct before or during the Mesozoic. A rapid expansion in the number of new forms before the close of the Mesozoic gave rise to practically all the Holocene families living today. Paleozoic shark remains are not known from Oregon, but teeth of the Cretaceous genus Scapanorhyn­ chus have been collected from the Hudspeth Formation near Mitchell, Oregon. Recent work has shown that elasmobranch teeth occur in abundance west of the Cascades in marine Tertiary strata ranging in age from late Eocene to middle Miocene (Figures 1 and 2). All members of the EIasmobranchii possess a cartilaginous endoskeleton which deteriorates rapidly upon death and is only rarely preserved in the fossil record. Only under exceptional conditions of preservation, usually in a highly reducing environment, will cranial or postcranial elements be fossilized.
  • Bulletin 44 Part One

    Bulletin 44 Part One

    CMFRI bulletin 44 Part One JUNE 1989 NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE FISHERIES MANDAPAM CAMP 16-18 September 1987 Papers Presented Sessions I & II ^xs^e"" %^ "Oy. # CENTRAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE c a> O 40 (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) YEADS P. B. No. 2704, E. R. G. Road, Cochin-682 031, India CMFRI bulletin 44 Part One JUNE 1989 YEADS NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE FISHERIES MANDAPAM CAMP 16-18 September 1987 Papers Presented Sessions I & II CENTRAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (Indian Council of Agricultural Research) P. B. No. 2704, E. R. G. Road, Cochin-682 031, India Bulletins are issued periodically by Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute to interpret current knowledge in the various fields of research on marine fisheries and allied subjects in India. Copyright Reserved © Published by P. S. B. R. JAMES Director Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute ERG Road Cochin-682 031, India Editorial Committee Dr K ALAGARSWAMI Dr K ALAGARAJA Shri M S MUTHU Dr K J MATHEW Dr N GOPINATHA MENON Limited Circulation CONTENTS Technical Session I. NATIONAL FISHERY POLICY AND PLANNING IVIarine Fisheries Development — An outlook U. K. Srivastava for 21st century and key policy Issues Growth Profile of Marine Fisheries in India P. S. B. R. James 10 Planning for Fishery Development — A. G. Jhlngran and S. Paul 28 Search for appropriate policy instruments 33 Monitoring Industrial Effluents Discharge along Y. B. Raval and four others Gujarat Coast by Bio-Assay Test and Physico Chemical Parameters A Brief Appraisal of Marine Fisheries in India 36 K.