DOCSLIB.ORG

Equality Impact Assessment (Eqia) Has Been Undertaken and Is Annexed at Appendix a to the Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equality Impact Assessment (Eqia) Has Been Undertaken and Is Annexed at Appendix a to the Report Agenda AGENDA for a meeting of the ENVIRONMENT, PLANNING AND TRANSPORT CABINET PANEL in COMMITTEE ROOM B at County Hall, Hertford on THURSDAY, 30 JUNE 2016 at 10.00 AM ___________________________________________________________________ MEMBERS OF THE PANEL (11) (Quorum 3) D Andrews (Vice-Chairman), D A Ashley (Chairman), D J Barnard, N Bell, H K Crofton, A S B Walkington, N A Hollinghurst, M D M Muir, S J Taylor, R Sangster, R H Smith. Meetings of the Cabinet Panel are open to the public (this includes the press) and attendance is welcomed. However, there may be occasions when the public are excluded from the meeting for particular items of business. Any such items are taken at the end of the public part of the meeting and are listed under “Part II (‘closed’) agenda”. Committee Room B is fitted with an audio system to assist those with hearing impairment. Anyone who wishes to use this should contact main (front) reception. Members are reminded that all equalities implications and equalities impact assessments undertaken in relation to any matter on this agenda must be rigorously considered prior to any decision being reached on that matter. PART I (PUBLIC) AGENDA 1. MINUTES To confirm the Minutes of the meeting held on 10 May 2016 (attached). 2. PUBLIC PETITIONS The opportunity for any member of the public, being resident in Hertfordshire, to present a petition relating to a matter with which the Council is concerned, which is relevant to the remit of this Cabinet Panel and which contains signatories who are either resident in or who work in Hertfordshire. Members of the public who are considering raising an issue of concern via a petition are advised to contact their local member of the Council. The Council's arrangements for the receipt of petitions are set out in Annex 22 - Petitions Scheme of the Constitution. If you have any queries about the procedure please contact Theresa Baker, by telephone on (01992 556545) or by e-mail to [email protected] At the time of the publicationAgenda of this Pack agenda 1 of 353no notices of petitions have been 1 received. 3. PRESENTATION: UPDATE ON COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORT MODEL (COMET) Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment The Cabinet Panel will receive a presentation from Sue Jackson and Rupert Thacker covering COMET, a suite of models covering Hertfordshire and the surrounding area and comprising: - Highway model – all A, B & C roads, - Public Transport model (scheduled bus and rail services), - Demand model – Links models and allows tests of time shifts and mode shift. 4. TRANSPORT VISION- DRAFT LOCAL TRANSPORT PLAN PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROPOSALS AND PROJECT UPDATE Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment 5. RAIL STRATEGY Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment 6. INTERCITY WEST COAST RAIL FRANCHISE CONSULTATION Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment 7. A120 STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT – STANDON CONSULTATION UPDATE Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment 8. REVIEW OF HERTFORDSHIRE’S LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY – ISSUES AND OPTIONS CONSULTATION Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment 9. GROWTH DEAL ROUND 3 – UPDATE ON PROPOSED BIDS Report of the Chief Executive and Director of Environment 10 ENVIRONMENT, PLANNING & TRANSPORT PERFORMANCE MONITOR Report of the Chief Executive & Director of Environment 11. OTHER PART I BUSINESS Such Part I (public) business which, if the Chairman agrees, is of sufficient urgency to warrant consideration. PART II (‘CLOSED’) AGENDA EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC There are no items of Part II business on this agenda. If Part II business is notified the Chairman will move:- “That under Section 100(A) (4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item/s of business on the grounds that it/they involve/s the likely disclosureAgenda of exempt Pack 2 information of 353 as defined in paragraph/s 2 ……. of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the said Act and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.” If you require further information about this agenda please contact Theresa Baker, Democratic Services, on telephone no (01992 556545) or email [email protected]. Agenda documents are also available on the internet at: http://www.hertsdirect.org/hccmeetings Agenda Pack 3 of 353 3 Minutes To: All Members of the From: Legal, Democratic & Statutory Services Environment, Planning and Ask for: Theresa Baker Transport Cabinet Panel, Chief Ext: 26545 Executive, Chief Officers, All officers named for ‘actions’ ENVIRONMENT, PLANNING AND TRANSPORT CABINET PANEL, 10 MAY 2016 ATTENDANCE MEMBERS OF THE PANEL P A Ruffles (substituting for David Andrews), D A Ashley (Chairman), N Bell, H K Crofton, A S B Walkington, N A Hollinghurst, M D M Muir, R Sangster, R H Smith, S J Taylor Upon consideration of the agenda for the Environment, Planning and Transport Cabinet Panel meeting on 10 May 2016 as circulated, copy annexed, conclusions were reached and are recorded below: Note: No conflicts of interest were declared by any member of the Cabinet Panel in relation to the matters on which conclusions were reached at this meeting. PART I (‘OPEN’) BUSINESS ACTION 1. MINUTES 1.1 The Minutes of the Cabinet Panel meeting held on 8 March 2016 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. 2. PUBLIC PETITIONS 2.1 There were no public petitions. HIGH SPEED 2 - FORMAL RESPONSE OF HERTFORDSHIRE 3. COUNTY COUNCIL [Officer Contact: Jenny Foster, Senior Planning Officer, (Tel: 01992 556245)] 3.1 The Panel received a report to update and inform Members of the progress of the High Speed 2 (HS2) scheme and subsequently to enable Cabinet and the County Council to consider a proposal to authorise a petition to the House of Lords opposing the High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill. It also described the current level of engagement that theAgenda County Pack Council 4 of 353 had with HS2 Ltd on the scheme, the arrangements for joint working with Three Rivers 1 District Council and the need for community engagement. To clarify for Members the scenario and HS2 issues in relation to Hertfordshire, officers tabled maps of the proposed Old Shire Country Park and the Colne Valley including the main construction site and tunnel : HS2 Interactive Map; TABLED Maps for Colne Valley HS2 Site Map: HS2 Compound & Tunnel; Proposed Old Shire Country Park. 3.2 Officers advised Members that, subsequent to the success of the Council’s first petition in the House of Commons against the HS2 Bill in May 2014 (which resolved detailed local access and environmental issues but most importantly slip roads on to the M25), additional provisions had been introduced by HS2 in respect of other petitioners’ issues. For Hertfordshire the most significant of these was AP4, which proposed a longer tunnel under the Chilterns and would result in more spoil and a longer construction period. Members were informed that the Council had submitted its comments on AP4 to HS2 in November 2015 but as yet had not received a response. Consequently a further petition against the Bill (Hybrid) was submitted to the House of Lords on 18 April 2016 to formally raise these concerns and negotiate their resolution with HS2 and the Secretary of State for Transport. 3.3 Officers updated the Panel that the first meeting between the County Council and HS2 to discuss the issues raised in the petition had just taken place on 9 May 2016. 3.4 The Panel noted that the 2.6km increase in length of the Chiltern Tunnel was not proportionate to the increase in construction time from 1 to 4 years and remarked that there may be reasons other than purely constructional. Officers commented that that the increased time frame could be due to having to tunnel deeper and a wider Northern Portal. 3.5 Concern was expressed about increased environmental impact, e.g. on air quality, when removing chalk from the tunnel in the summer months. Officers reported that the County Council had requested air quality monitoring every quarter as there was insufficient environmental impact data in HS2 documentation. 3.6 Changes to the profile of the landscape were discussed by Members particularly the impact on nearby West Hyde village and Maple Cross. Officers confirmed that HS2 projected a 3-10m increase in height across the land in general, which would obscure the trains from view and reduce noise levels. The exact height would depend on the quality of material extracted during tunnelling; e.g. the chalk may be tunnelled using slurry methods and the resultant material would require drying and ultimately may not be 2 CHAIRMAN’S INITIALS Agenda Pack 5 of 353 ……………. suitable for landscaping use. It was clarified that the land was currently chalky arable; the top soil would be stripped off and later replaced on top of the new profile made from the tunnelled chalk 3.7 The requirement for a direct link from the extraction site to the HS2 compound (e.g. exit of Denham Park Farm pit (sand and gravel and restoration site) and also the movement of any imported material via the M25 was emphasised by the Panel . 3.8 The proposed excavation of minerals at Pynesfield (due to come to the County Council Development Control Planning Committee on 26 May 2016) was raised by the Local Member. Excavation of minerals from this gravel pit prior to and during the HS2 process for use by HS2 was suggested, thus shortening disruption to the local community and reducing vehicle movements over the rest of Hertfordshire.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hertfordshire Countryside Management Service CMS: Practical and Project Work
    Hertfordshire Countryside Management Service CMS: Practical and Project Work. Norman Jones Besides the excellent work of the Rights of Way Unit at Hertfordshire County Council the Countryside Management Service is working to improve the natural environment in Hertfordshire and promoting people’s enjoyment of it. There are two main strands of this work which are working in conjunction with the Rights of Way officers to make improvements to the Rights of Way network and project work within the districts which are sponsors of CMS. Rights of Way Work The CMS has three teams of volunteers doing practical work, on Tuesdays in the east of the County on Wednesday in the west and south of the county and on Thursday in the north of the county. Much of the work is on District Council green spaces but there is a substantial amount of work on the Rights of Way network clearing encroaching vegetation and enhancing infrastructure like replacing stiles with kissing gates. In the six months up to Autumn last year the conservation groups have installed or restored 258 steps. As noted in the CMS Newsletter if this was calculated as one continuous flight it would scale 39 metres, the height of a 20 storey building. 65 metres of new boardwalk has been installed. A particular achievement was the building of a flight of 21 steps at Charlton near Hitchin. Green Spaces I will initially highlight some of the sites with particular interest for walkers. Oughtonhead Common Oughtonhead Common is on the Eastern outskirts of Hitchin. The common runs up to the River Oughton and access is also possible on the private land running up to the source of the river at Oughton Head.
    [Show full text]
  • North Hertfordshire Green Belt Review
    99 North Hertfordshire Green Belt Review July 2016 North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011 - 2031 Evidence Base Report North Hertfordshire Green Belt Review July 2016 2 North Hertfordshire Green Belt Review July 2016 Contents 1. Background and Approach to the Review…………………………………. 5 PART ONE: ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT GREEN BELT, VILLAGES IN THE GREEN BELT AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITES IN THE GREEN BELT 2. Strategic Review of the Green Belt…………………………………...………….. 9 2.1 Background to Review 2.2 Role and purpose of Green Belt 2.3 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2.4 Methodology 2.5 Assessment - existing Green Belt 2.6 Checking the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas 2.7 Preventing neighbouring towns merging into one another 2.8 Safeguarding the countryside from encroachment 2.9 Preserving the setting and special character of Historic Towns 2.10 Overall contribution to Green Belt purposes 3. Refined Review of the Green Belt……………………………………………..…. 33 4. Analysis of Villages in the Green Belt…………………………………………... 67 4.1 Purpose and Method of Appraisal 4.2 NHDC Proposed Policy Context 4.3 Analysis of Contribution to the Green Belt 5. Analysis of Potential Development Sites in the Green Belt…………………. 99 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Methodology - potential development sites 5.3 Assessment of Potential Development Sites PART TWO: ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ADDITIONS TO THE GREEN BELT 6. Assessment of Countryside beyond the Green Belt………………………….. 135 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Role and purpose of Green Belt 6.3 Methodology – potential Green Belt areas
    [Show full text]
  • Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Welwyn Hatfield Council Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report May 2016 Welwyn Hatfield Council Council Offices The Campus Welwyn Garden City Hertfordshire AL8 8AE This page is intentionally left blank 2015s2849_WHBC_SFRA_FINAL_Report_v4.0 i JBA Project Manager Joanne Chillingworth The Library St Philip’s Courtyard Church End COLESHILL B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Amendments Issued to Date Issued Draft v1.0 / Submitted Level 1 SFRA only. Some sections were still Andrew Turner 10th July 2015 incomplete whilst awaiting data. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Draft v2.0 / Submitted Level 1 and Level 2 draft report, pending Andrew Turner 3rd September 2015 additional sites summary tables. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v1.0 Submitted Level 1 and Level 2 reports with alterations Andrew Turner 5th November 2015 based on WHC, HCC & EA comments. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v2.0 Submitted Level 1 and Level 2 reports with alterations Andrew Turner 18th November 2015 based on WHC comments. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v3.0 Submitted Level 1 and Level report with minor amendments Andrew Turner 3nd December 2015 and alterations regarding phasing. (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Final v4.0 Amendments relating to the new climate change guidance, Andrew Turner 10th May 2016 published February 2016 (Welwyn Hatfield Council) Contract This report describes work commissioned by Welwyn Hatfield Council. The Council’s representative for the contract was Andrew Turner. Prepared by .................................................. Andrew Waite BSc MRes Analyst ....................................................................... Joanne Chillingworth BSc MSc C.WEM MCIWEM Chartered Senior Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc C.WEM MCIWEM Chartered Senior Analyst Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Level 1 and 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Report for Welwyn Hatfield Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Thameswater Tida L T Hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels
    ThamesWater Tida l T hames Defence Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels August 1987 A R CHI VE : PLEA SE D O N OT DES TR O Y ThamesWater Tidal T ha mes Defe nce Levels Preliminary Report on River Lee Flows and Levels August 1987 Sir William Ha !crow & Partners Ltd Institute of Hydrology PREL IMINARY RIVER LEE ANALYSIS CONTENT S Page No GLOSSARY SUMMA RY 1. INTRODUCT ION 1 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2 The Lower River Lee Sys tem , 1 1.3 Da ta Availability 2 2 . DATA COLLECT ION 3 2.1 Tida l Wa ter Level Data 3 2 .2 Flood Da ta for the Lower Lee and Tribu taries 3 2 .3 Sub-catchment Area s 3 2 .4 Urban Area s 4 3 . TR END ANALYSES 5 3 .1 Water Leve l Trend s 5 3 .2 Flood Trend s 5 4 . FREQUENCY ANA LY SES OF T IDAL WATER LEVELS 6 4 .1 Frequen cy of Tida l Wa ter Leve ls 6 4 .2 Adj ustment to Lee Mouth 6 7 . FLOOD FREQUENC IES AT RIV ER GAUGING STAT IONS ON THE LOW ER LEE 7 5 .1 General Approach 7 5.2 Flood Frequencies Based on Data Ana lyses 7 5.3 Flood Frequencies Using FSR P rocedures 8 5.4 Propo sed Flood Frequenc ies for Ga uging Station s 9 6 . FLOOD FREQUENC IES IN LOW ER LEE CHA NNELS 10 6 .1 Flood Freq uencies in Lee Flood Relie f Channe l 10 6 .2 Flood Frequenc ies in Lee Nav iga tion Chan ne l 11 FIGURES 1.1 Diagramma tic Sys tem o f the Lower Lee 3.1 Flood Trends 4 .1 Concurren t Peak Water Leve ls at Brunsw ick Wha rf and Tow er P ier 5 .1 Feildes Weir Con current Flood s , Instan taneous and Mean Da ily 5.2 Flood Frequency Ana ly ses 5.3 G row th Fac to rs fo r Main Lee 5.4 G rowth Fac tors fo r Low er Lee Tributaries
    [Show full text]
  • North Hertfordshire Open Space Review & Standards 2016
    North Hertfordshire Open Space Review & Standards 2016 PART 1: OPEN SPACE REVIEW 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Access to high quality open spaces and opportunities for sport and recreation can make an important contribution to the health and well-being of communities; and if well designed and maintained they can make areas attractive places to live, work and visit. 1.2 Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (PPG17): Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation (2002) aimed to improve the quantity and quality of open space, by requiring local authorities to undertake an assessment of needs and opportunities in their area, and to develop a series of local standards by which to improve the overall provision of open space. 1.3 In 2009 an assessment was carried out to assess the provision of open space, sport and recreation facilities in North Hertfordshire, based on PPG17 and its Companion Guide (Assessing Needs and Opportunities). This North Hertfordshire Green Space Standards document examined the existing provision based on different types of open space and set out open space standards, differentiating between urban and rural developments. 1.4 The purpose of this 2016 report is to review open space provision in the District since the open space assessment undertaken in 2009. In doing so, it will provide an updated position on the latest provision of open space, sport and recreation facilities in North Hertfordshire. This work is being done in line with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (2012) and Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) (2014), which have replaced PPG17 and its Companion Guide. 1.5 This 2016 update will ensure that the Local Plan is supported by an up-to-date assessment and will form part of the evidence base.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Flag Award Winners 2019 England East Midlands 125 Green Flag Award Winners
    Green Flag Award Winners 2019 England East Midlands 125 Green Flag Award winners Park Title Heritage Managing Organisation Belper Cemetery Amber Valley Borough Council Belper Parks Amber Valley Borough Council Belper River Gardens Amber Valley Borough Council Crays Hill Recreation Ground Amber Valley Borough Council Crossley Park Amber Valley Borough Council Heanor Memorial Park Amber Valley Borough Council Pennytown Ponds Local Nature Reserve Amber Valley Borough Council Riddings Park Amber Valley Borough Council Ampthill Great Park Ampthill Town Council Rutland Water Anglian Water Services Ltd Brierley Forest Park Ashfield District Council Kingsway Park Ashfield District Council Lawn Pleasure Grounds Ashfield District Council Portland Park Ashfield District Council Selston Golf Course Ashfield District Council Titchfield Park Hucknall Ashfield District Council Kings Park Bassetlaw District Council The Canch (Memorial Gardens) Bassetlaw District Council A Place To Grow Blaby District Council Glen Parva and Glen Hills Local Nature Reserves Blaby District Council Bramcote Hills Park Broxtowe Borough Council Colliers Wood Broxtowe Borough Council Chesterfield Canal (Kiveton Park to West Stockwith) Canal & River Trust Erewash Canal Canal & River Trust Queen’s Park Charnwood Borough Council Chesterfield Crematorium Chesterfield Borough Council Eastwood Park Chesterfield Borough Council Holmebrook Valley Park Chesterfield Borough Council Poolsbrook Country Park Chesterfield Borough Council Queen’s Park Chesterfield Borough Council Boultham
    [Show full text]
  • HERTFORDSHIRE BIOLOGICAL RECORDS CENTRE Environment, County Hall, Hertford, Herts, SG13 8DN
    HERTFORDSHIRE BIOLOGICAL RECORDS CENTRE Environment, County Hall, Hertford, Herts, SG13 8DN Planning Policy Ask for: M. Hicks North Herts District Council Our Ref: District Council Offices Your Ref: Gernon Road Tel: 01992 556158 Letchworth Garden City SG6 3JF Date: 21/03/2013 Dear Sir Local Plan 2011 – 2031 Housing Options Growth Levels and Locations 2011 – 2031 Consultation Paper February 2013 I would like to make the following comments on the above consultation: 1. Housing Options Part 1: Housing Numbers 1. There is no indication as to how many of the strategic Sites might be used, or whether it may be that parts of all of them may be released for development, although if new discrete communities are planned with minimum sizes for facilities etc. this may not be an option. It is suggested that at least one will be required to meet the target of 10,700 dwellings (1.46). However, if somewhat variable, this could obviously have an impact on the environmental implications of any development. 2. Currently, the increase in proposed homes represents an increase of over 20% of the existing resource; this will also – crudely - increase the resulting generic environmental pressures such as increasing transport, water demand, pollution and disturbance by 20%, overall within the District and locally where development takes place. This may result in direct impacts such as the lowering of water tables if over-abstraction occurs, as well as increased nitrogen deposition, although it is hoped that measures will be taken in an attempt to address these issues as part of more detailed planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    Front and Back Cover:Front and Back Cover 1/10/07 13:47 Page 1 Supplementary Planning Document Development Plans Team September 2007 Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Herts Local Plan Second Review 2007 September 2007 CONTENTS PAGE Pages 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Purpose & Status 2-3 3.0 Background & Context 4-7 4.0 The Landscape of Hertfordshire 8-15 5.0 Methodology 16-23 6.0 Landscape Character Areas 24-26 Appendix A Bibliography 278 Appendix B Glossary 280 Appendix C Field Survey Sheet 282 Appendix D Landscape Character Area Map 284 (Separate A1 sheet) East Herts District Landscape Character Assessment ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Landscape Partnership produced this technical study on behalf of East Herts District Council in partnership with Hertfordshire County Council (HCC). The Landscape Partnership Ltd is a prac- tice registered with the Landscape Institute and the Royal Town Planning Institute and is a member of the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. This document could not have been achieved without the com- bined efforts of the staff of Hertfordshire County Council, East Hertfordshire District Council, North Hertfordshire District Council, their consultants Babtie, The Living Landscapes Project and The Landscape Partnership Limited. The project was financially spon- sored by the following: Countryside Management Services (work- ing in Hertfordshire and Barnet), East Hertfordshire District Council, Hertfordshire Biological Records Centre (HBRC), and Hertfordshire County Council. The Landscape Partnership would like to thank all those who par- ticipated and in particular: * Members of HCC staff, especially Simon Odell, Head of Landscape, who supplied unfailing encouragement, quotations and many photographs; Frances Hassett, HBRC, who enabled Trevor James, (formerly HBRC) to make further contributions from his intimate knowledge of the ecology of the county; Alison Tinniswood for her assistance on the county's history and Lynn Dyson-Bruce, on secondment from English Heritage, for her valiant work on the historic landscape data.
    [Show full text]
  • M25 Junction 23 to 27 - Section 5 Managed Motorways – All Lanes Running Stage 3 - Preliminary Design
    M25 Junction 23 to 27 - Section 5 Managed Motorways – All Lanes Running Stage 3 - Preliminary Design Environmental Assessment Report Document No: 5084755-S5-DO-EN-251 November 2012 Volume 1 M25 Junction 23 to 27 - Section 5 Revision: E Environmental Assessment Report Volume: 1 Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Project Identification 8 1.2 Purpose of this Report 8 1.3 Scope and Content 9 1.4 The Overseeing Organisation 10 1.5 The DBFO Contractor 10 2. The Project 11 2.1 Background to the Project 11 2.2 History of the Project 11 2.3 Regulatory Framework 12 2.4 Project Objectives 12 2.5 Any Further Support of Government Policies 14 2.6 Project Description 14 2.7 Land Use Setting and Land Take 15 2.8 Construction, Operation and Long Term Management 15 3. Alternatives Considered 18 3.1 Design Options 18 4. Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology 20 4.1 Scoping 20 4.2 Surveys and Predictive Techniques, Method and Constraints 21 4.3 Changes to DMRB 22 4.4 Significance Criteria 22 4.5 Mitigation and Enhancement 22 5. Air Quality 23 5.1 Introduction 23 5.2 Study Area 23 5.3 Baseline Conditions 24 5.4 Methodology 38 5.5 Regulatory/Policy Framework 49 5.6 Design, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 58 5.7 Magnitude of Impacts (Change) 59 5.8 Supplementary Information 73 5.9 Indication of Any Difficulties Encountered 73 5.10 Summary 73 6. Cultural Heritage 75 6.1 Study Area 75 6.2 Baseline Conditions 75 6.3 Methodology 75 6.4 Value (Sensitivity of Resource) 76 6.5 Regulatory/Policy Framework 76 6.6 Design, Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 81 Document No: 5084755-S5-DO-EN-251 Page 1 M25 Junction 23 to 27 - Section 5 Revision: E Environmental Assessment Report Volume: 1 6.7 Magnitude of Impacts (Change) and Significant Effects 81 6.8 Significance of Effects on Plans and Policies 92 6.9 Indication of Any Difficulties Encountered 92 6.10 Recommendations 92 6.11 Summary 92 7.
    [Show full text]
  • CD5.1 Broxbourne Local Plan 2018-2033
    THE BROXBOURNE LOCAL PLAN A FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOROUGH JUNE 2020 www.broxbourne.gov.uk/localplan Local Plan 2018 - 2033 BLANK PAGE 1 Contents Summary and Key Points ........................................................................................... 4 Part 1: Introduction 1 Introduction to the Local Plan .................................................................................. 9 Part 2: Development Strategy ............................................................................... 13 2 Vision and Objectives ............................................................................................ 14 3 Development Strategy ........................................................................................... 16 Part 3: Places 4 Sustainable Place-Making ..................................................................................... 31 5 Brookfield .............................................................................................................. 32 6 Broxbourne ............................................................................................................ 45 7 Cheshunt ............................................................................................................... 48 8 Goffs Oak and St. James'...................................................................................... 65 9 Hoddesdon ............................................................................................................ 69 10 Park Plaza ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 23/06/2010, 10.00
    Agenda for Board Meeting to be held at 10.00 am on Wednesday 23 June 2010 in Potten End Village Hall, Potten End, Berkhamsted, HP4 1QG Agenda Item Timing Page No 1. Apologies for Absence / Changes in Membership 10.00 2. Declarations of Interest 10.02 To declare any personal and prejudicial interests 3. Minutes 10.03 1 - 12 of the meeting held on 24 March 2010, to be confirmed. The Report of the Chief Officer is attached as appendix 1 to the minutes. 4. Matters Arising 10.06 5. Public Question Time 10.10 6. Report from the Executive Committee 10.13 13 - 14 7. Report from the Planning Committee 10.18 15 - 18 8. Statement of Accounts 2001/10 10.28 19 - 40 9. Contingency Plan in case of In Year Grant Cuts 10.48 41 - 44 10. Report on High Speed 2 11.05 45 - 50 11. Working with Schools and Young People 11.45 51 - 54 12. Report on the Chiltern Cycleway 12.05 55 - 58 13. Report on the Commons Project 12.25 59 - 60 14. Report on the Work Programme 2009-2010 12.45 61 - 74 15. Date of Next and Future Meetings The next meeting of the Conservation Board, including the AGM, will be held on Wednesday 20 October 2010 at 10.00am in The Large Dining Room, Judges Lodgings, Buckinghamshire County Council. Dates of future meetings: 2011 19 January 23 March 22 June 19 October including the AGM MAP GIVING DIRECTIONS TO POTTEN END VILLAGE HALL For further information please contact: Maureen Keyworth at Democratic Services, Buckinghamshire County Council, Room 124, Old County Offices, Aylesbury HP20 1UA.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Applications for Determination
    PLANNING AND REGULATORY COMMITTEE 16th April 2019 PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR DETERMINATION Item: 1 07/18/1039/F Location: High View Farm, Crouch Lane, Goffs Oak Description: Demolition of existing buildings, change of use of land to residential use [C3] and redevelopment of the site with 10 detached dwelling houses Applicant: D & M Sewell Agent: Mr Peter Biggs, Lanes New Homes Date Received: 26/10/2018 Date of Committee: 16/04/2019 Officer Contact: Peter Quaile Expiry Date: 21/10/2018 Ward Councillors: Cllr Mills-Bishop [Leader], Cllr Moule and Cllr Pearce RECOMMENDED that planning permission be granted subject to the applicant first completing a planning obligation under s.106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 [as amended] for the terms set out in this report and the conditions set out at the end of this report 1.0 CONSULTATIONS 1.1 HCC Highways. Objection. There is insufficient information supplied within this application, specifically, the applicant has not undertaken vehicle tracking of two cars, a supermarket delivery van, and a refuse vehicle routing through the new/proposed access design. As such, the Highway Authority recommends refusal due to doubt over possible implications for highway safety and convenience. 1.2 Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust – No objection 1.3 HCC Flood Team – No objection subject to conditions 1.4 Environmental Health Service – No objection subject to conditions 2.0 PUBLICITY 2.1 The application was advertised by means of a site notice, a newspaper advert (in the Mercury on 01/11/2018) and 10 individual
    [Show full text]