DOCSLIB.ORG

And Mutl-Related Heterocomplexes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Mutl-Related Heterocomplexes Commentary Multiple functions of MutS- and MutL-related heterocomplexes Takuro Nakagawa, Abhijit Datta, and Richard D. Kolodner* Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, CMME 3080, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0660 eterodimeric complexes of MutS- paired in msh4, zip1, and mer3 mutants (3, from zygotene (synapsis is started) Hand MutL-related proteins were 9, 14). zip1, zip2, and mer3 mutations also through pachytene (homologs are fully identified from studies of DNA mismatch cause cell-cycle arrest before meiosis I. synapsed) in oocytes (21–23). In contrast, repair (MMR) and have been implicated Although homolog nondisjunction is a pri- MLH1 is detected only at pachytene in in processing of recombination interme- mary cause of missegregation in crossing- spermatocytes. Although human PMS1 is diates. In a recent issue of PNAS, Wang et over-deficient mutants, precocious sepa- most closely related to the yeast MLH3 al. (1) have reported several observations ration of sister chromatids has also been and interacts with MLH1, it is also highly about the function of MutL-related genes observed in msh4, msh5, and zip1 mutants. related to yeast MLH2 (12, 24). Interest- of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in ZIP1 localizes continuously along the ingly, Pms1Ϫ͞Ϫ mice are fertile, suggesting MMR and recombination in meiosis. entire length of meiotic chromosomes few, if any, meiotic defects (25). Human First, they have observed that MLH1 is the when homologs are synapsed, which de- PMS2 (the yeast PMS1 homolog) forms a common subunit in three different MutL- pends on ZIP2 (7, 8). However, before heterodimer with MLH1, and Pms2Ϫ͞Ϫ related heterodimeric complexes, MLH1– synapsis, ZIP1 and ZIP2 are colocalized as mice show only male infertility (26, 27). PMS1, MLH1–MLH2, and MLH1– discrete foci on meiotic chromosomes. These findings raise questions about the MLH3. Second, a possible role of MLH1– ZIP2 also colocalizes with MRE11, a com- identity of the mammalian MLH3 ho- MLH2 in MMR was detected. Third, and ponent of the MRE11–RAD50–XRS2 molog and possibly suggest some redun- most striking, MLH1–MLH3 was shown complex, which is required for double- dancy between mammalian PMS1 and to play an important role in promoting strand break (DSB) formation and resec- PMS2. However, involvement of murine Ј crossing-over. This last observation ex- tion of the 5 ends (for a review, see ref. Msh5 and Mlh1 in chromosome synapsis in tends the eukaryotic paradigm of combi- 15). In addition, ZIP2 localization de- meiosis implies a conserved mechanism of natorial interactions between MutS- and pends on DSB formation. These results crossing-over. MutL-related heterodimeric complexes suggest that ZIP2 localizes at sites of and mispaired bases to other types of recombination. MSH4 has also been Combinatorial Specificity of MutS and MutL DNA structures formed during replica- shown to localize to similar discrete foci Homologs. Heterodimeric complexes of tion, recombination, and repair. on meiotic chromosomes (4). In zip1 and MutS- and MutL-related proteins were mer3 mutants, DSBs are not completely first observed in studies of eukaryotic Genetics of Crossover Regulation. In most converted to later intermediates, and pro- MMR (for reviews, see refs. 28–30). Ex- organisms, meiotic crossing-over of ho- gression of meiosis is delayed or blocked tensive studies have defined at least six mologous chromosomes (homologs) and (9, 16). Cell-cycle arrest occurs in zip2 different heterodimeric complexes that in- cohesion between sister chromatids are mutants, although the kinetics of DSB teract in different combinations (Fig. 1). required for faithful segregation of chro- repair has not been studied (8, 17). The Combinations of these different com- mosomes (2, 3). Several yeast genes, in- available data suggest that MSH4, MSH5, plexes apparently direct the processing of cluding MutS- and MutL-related genes, MLH1, MLH3, ZIP1, ZIP2, MER3, and different types of DNA structures. are required for normal levels of crossing- EXO1 all function at a similar time in Two MutS-related heterodimeric com- over but not for gene conversion; these meiosis and that defects in these genes plexes, MSH2–MSH6 and MSH2–MSH3, include MSH4, MSH5, MLH1, MLH3, cause similar defects in crossing-over. have been found to function in the repair ZIP1, ZIP2, MER3, and EXO1 (refs. 1 and MSH4, MSH5, and MLH1 homologs of mispaired bases generated during DNA 4–9; H. Tsubouchi and H. Ogawa, per- have been found in higher eukaryotes. replication and recombination. It seems sonal communication). Mutations in these Human MSH4 and MSH5 proteins form a that MSH2–MSH6 interacts with base͞ genes reduce crossing-over by 50% or heterodimeric complex (11, 13). Msh5Ϫ͞Ϫ Ϫ͞Ϫ base and insertion͞deletion mispairs, more, resulting in increased levels of ho- or Mlh1 mutant mice show male and whereas MSH2–MSH3 interacts only with molog nondisjunction and spore death. female infertility (18–21). Asynapsis insertion͞deletion mispairs (for a review, Genetic analyses have shown that MSH4, and͞or synapsis between nonhomologs see ref. 30). These complexes function in MSH5, and MLH1 are in the same epista- followed by apoptotic cell death before or conjunction with MutL-related het- sis group with regard to crossing-over, during pachytene are observed in these Ϫ͞Ϫ erodimeric complexes and with other in- indicating that crossing-over in these mu- mutant mice. In Mlh1 mice, high levels teracting proteins such as EXO1 and tants is not due to functional redundancy of univalents are seen as homologs desyn- PCNA (31–36). MLH1–PMS1, a MutL- among these genes (5, 6). The formation apse in the spermatocytes that do not of MSH4–MSH5 and MLH1–MLH3 het- undergo apoptosis, indicating that Mlh1 is erodimeric complexes has also been es- required for the formation or stabilization See companion article on page 13914 in issue 24 of tablished (1, 10–13). The regulation of the of chiasmata, the cytological manifesta- volume 96. distribution of crossovers along a chromo- tion of crossing-over. The MLH1 protein *To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: some, crossover interference, is also im- localizes to discrete foci on chromosomes [email protected]. 14186–14188 ͉ PNAS ͉ December 7, 1999 ͉ vol. 96 ͉ no. 25 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 and may involve direct recognition of Hol- liday junctions by MSH2–MSH6 (45–48). Interestingly, processing of SSA interme- diates involves MSH2–MSH3 and RAD1– RAD10, which interact with each other, but does not involve a MutL-related com- plex (49, 50). Regulation of crossing-over requires MSH4–MSH5 and MLH1–MLH3 (1, 4–6). However, it is not known whether these protein complexes interact with each other or whether MSH4–MSH5 interacts with DNA. Interactions with other pro- teins involved in regulating crossing-over have not been investigated, but logical candidates for such proteins include ZIP1, ZIP2, MER3, and EXO1. The above data raise the interesting possibility that the different MutS-related complexes reflect either divergent evolu- tion of protein complexes that recognize different DNA structures or a combina- torial mechanism for generating different DNA recognition specificity. Further Fig. 1. Combinatorial specificities of MutS- and MutL-related heterocomplexes. (a) Base͞base mispairs; specificity is generated through interac- ͞ Ј (b) insertion deletion mispairs; (c)5 tailed DNA structures generated by single-strand DNA annealing tions with other accessory factors such as (SSA) recombination; (d) Holliday junctions. Note that the DNA binding specificity for MSH4–MSH5 and its interaction with MLH1–MLH3 have not been shown. MLH1–MLH2 is not indicated, because it is not clear the MutL-related complexes and other with which MutS-related complex it interacts. proteins like RAD1–RAD10 and EXO1. The end result is a diverse set of mecha- nisms that direct the processing of DNA related complex, plays a major role in both vention of recombination between diver- structures generated during replication, the MSH2–MSH6 and MSH2–MSH3 gent DNA sequences, possibly by regulat- repair, and recombination. pathways and interacts with these two ing the extent of heteroduplex formation, Mechanistic Aspects of Meiotic Crossing- complexes (32, 36, 37). MLH1–MLH3, and the processing of SSA intermediates. Over. There are both early and late steps another MutL-related complex, also MSH2–MSH6, MSH2–MSH3, MLH1– during recombination at which proteins COMMENTARY seems to play a role in the repair of some PMS1, RAD1–RAD10, and EXO1 are like MSH4–MSH5 and MLH1–MLH3 mispaired bases recognized by MSH2– involved in preventing recombination be- might act (Fig. 2). That an early step might MSH3 (12). tween divergent DNA sequences (38–44). affect crossing-over can be visualized by MutS- and MutL-related proteins have The formation of gene conversion polarity examining the synthesis-dependent an- functions in recombination that are inde- gradients during meiotic recombination nealing model of DSB repair (for a review, pendent of MMR. These include the pre- requires MSH2–MSH6 and MLH1–PMS1 see ref. 51). In this model, the 3Ј end of one DNA strand invades the intact DNA partner and primes DNA synthesis. If this intermediate is unwound, single-strand annealing with the other half of the bro- ken chromosome can occur leading to gene conversion not associated with cross- ing-over. Alternatively, the invaded inter- mediate can be converted to intermedi- ates containing Holliday junctions, and crossovers or noncrossovers can result de- pending on how the junction is processed. Crossover control could occur early if the proteins required for crossing-over pro- mote the conversion of the single-end invasion intermediate to intermediates containing Holliday junctions. Alterna- tively, crossover control could occur at a late step if the protein required for cross- ing-over increases the Holliday junction cleavage in the orientation for the forma- tion of crossovers (4, 5).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An RNA Holliday Junction? Structural and Dynamic Considerations of the Bacteriophage T4 Gene 60 Interruption
    J. Mol. Biol. (1990) 213, 199-201 COMMUNICATIONS An RNA Holliday Junction? Structural and Dynamic Considerations of the Bacteriophage T4 Gene 60 Interruption Donald H. Burke-Agiiero and John E. Hearst Department of Chemistry University of California, Laboratory of Chemical Biodynamics Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. (Received 20 June 1988; accepted 20 November 1989) A novel interrupted gene motif has been reported in which a 50-nucleotide insertion into bacteriophage T4 gene 60 appears to be present in the message at the time of translation, yet it is not translated. We present here a dynamic model for how translation may be occurring in the neighborhood of the interruption. The model involves formation of an RNA structure with similarities to a Holliday junction, followed by migration of the branch point in a strand exchange between message and interruption. The advantage of this model over previous ones is that at no time is a new tRNA required to pair with a discontinuous template. Huang et al. (1988) have reported a novel gene tion; the order of events is not important to this interruption motif in gene 60 of bacteriophage T4, model. More extensive branch migration is hindered in which a 50-nucleotide intervening segment is by the lack of sequence homology between the neither removed nor translated. The sequence of the message and the dumbbell outside these five bases. interruption suggests that it can be folded to bring When tRNA G~y moves into the P site, the template the translated codons on either side of the inter- 3' to Gly46 will now be in position to receive the ruption into close proximity (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Holliday Junction Resolvases
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Holliday Junction Resolvases Haley D.M. Wyatt and Stephen C. West London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Herts EN6 3LD, United Kingdom Correspondence: [email protected] Four-way DNA intermediates, called Holliday junctions (HJs), can form during meiotic and mitotic recombination, and their removal is crucial for chromosome segregation. A group of ubiquitous and highly specialized structure-selective endonucleases catalyze the cleavage of HJs into two disconnected DNA duplexes in a reaction called HJ resolution. These enzymes, called HJ resolvases, have been identified in bacteria and their bacteriophages, archaea, and eukaryotes. In this review, we discuss fundamental aspects of the HJ structure and their interaction with junction-resolving enzymes. This is followed by a brief discussion of the eubacterial RuvABC enzymes, which provide the paradigm for HJ resolvases in other organisms. Finally, we review the biochemical and structural properties of some well-char- acterized resolvases from archaea, bacteriophage, and eukaryotes. omologous recombination (HR) is an es- homologous strand as a template for DNA syn- Hsential process that promotes genetic di- thesis. Recombination then proceeds in one of versity during meiosis (see Lam and Keeney several different ways, some of which involve 2014; Zickler and Kleckner 2014). However, in second-end capture, such that the other resect- somatic cells, HR plays a key role in conserv- ed 30 end anneals to the displaced strand of the ing genetic information by facilitating DNA re- D-loop (Szostak et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mutation in the Putative MLH3 Endonuclease Domain Confers a Defect in Both Mismatch Repair and Meiosis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    Copyright Ó 2008 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.086645 A Mutation in the Putative MLH3 Endonuclease Domain Confers a Defect in Both Mismatch Repair and Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae K. T. Nishant, Aaron J. Plys and Eric Alani1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-2703 Manuscript received January 2, 2008 Accepted for publication March 20, 2008 ABSTRACT Interference-dependent crossing over in yeast and mammalian meioses involves the mismatch repair protein homologs MSH4-MSH5 and MLH1-MLH3. The MLH3 protein contains a highly conserved metal- binding motif DQHA(X)2E(X)4E that is found in a subset of MLH proteins predicted to have endonuclease activities (Kadyrov et al. 2006). Mutations within this motif in human PMS2 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae PMS1 disrupted the endonuclease and mismatch repair activities of MLH1-PMS2 and MLH1-PMS1, re- spectively (Kadyrov et al. 2006, 2007; Erdeniz et al. 2007). As a first step in determining whether such an activity is required during meiosis, we made mutations in the MLH3 putative endonuclease domain motif (-D523N, -E529K) and found that single and double mutations conferred mlh3-null-like defects with respect to meiotic spore viability and crossing over. Yeast two-hybrid and chromatography analyses showed that the interaction between MLH1 and mlh3-D523N was maintained, suggesting that the mlh3-D523N mutation did not disrupt the stability of MLH3. The mlh3-D523N mutant also displayed a mutator phenotype in vegetative growth that was similar to mlh3D. Overexpression of this allele conferred a dominant-negative phenotype with respect to mismatch repair.
    [Show full text]
  • Research in Biology Using Computation Doi
    Journal of Bioinformatics and Genomics 2 (7) 2018 RESEARCH IN BIOLOGY USING COMPUTATION DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/jbg.2018.2.7.1 Grishaeva T.M.* Department of Cytogenetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation * Correspodning author (grishaeva[at]vigg.ru) Received: 18.03.2018; Accepted: 05.04.2018; Published: 22.05.2018 COMPARATIVE CONSERVATION OF MEIOTIC PROTEINS IN DIFFERENT PHYLOGENETIC LINES OF EUKARYOTES Research article Abstract Motivation: Meiosis — a two-stage process of sex cell division — is served by several hundreds of proteins. A part of them went to eukaryotes from prokaryotes, others appeared in first eukaryotes, and some proteins appeared de novo in multicellular eukaryotes. We compared the conservation of proteins involved in various processes occurring in meiosis. Results: The conservations of five meiotic enzymes (MLH1, MRE11, MSH4, BRCA1, BRCA2) and three silencing markers (histone H2AX, SUMO1, ATR) were compared using a set of bioinformatics methods. Orthologs of these proteins from the proteomes of model species were compared, representing different lines of development of eukaryotes. Among the enzymes, the most conserved is MLH1, which provide correction of mismatch bases, and the least conserved are BRCA1 and BRCA2 repair enzymes which are present only in vertebrates. Among silencing proteins, histone H2AX is the most conserved one, playing the central part in the regulation of the transcription, in the repair and replication of DNA. The small protein SUMO1, which is involved in many cellular processes, is less conserved. ATR kinase in different species is similar only in the C-terminal part of the molecule.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into Holliday Junction Resolution and Chromosome Segregation in Yeast
    September 17, 2012 SCIENCE SPOTLIGHT Insights into Holliday Junction Resolution and Chromosome Segregation in Yeast September 17, 2012 ME Arnegard Homologous DNA recombination is the highly conserved process by which similar or identical nucleotide sequences are exchanged between two DNA molecules. In all eukaryotes – from yeast to humans – this kind of genetic recombination serves two critical functions during meiosis, the class of cell division that leads to the formation of gametes such as sperm and eggs in the case of humans, or spores in yeast: Homologous recombination promotes the genetic diversity of gametes by allowing crossing-over between homologous chromosomes, and it is also critical to accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis. Anomalies in recombination often result in the complete loss of chromosomes during meiosis, or in chromosomal rearrangements such as deletions or translocations, which in turn can lead to birth defects or cancer. All current models for crossing-over involve two key intermediate structures: DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and Holliday junctions (HJs). DSBs are the initiating events in crossing-over that are caused by Rec12 in fission yeast, whereas HJs are the crossed-strand structures by which DNA molecules from two homologous chromosomes become intertwined (see figure). At the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, the laboratory of Dr. Gerald Smith (Basic Sciences Division) has made many advances toward understanding a complex pathway composed of dozens of proteins that promote homologous recombination in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) by moving or pairing chromosomes, or forming or repairing DSBs. In a previous study, for example, Cromie et al. (2006) provided strong evidence that HJs in fission yeast are 'resolved' (i.e., precisely cut and reconnected into two independent helices) solely by the endonucleolytic activity of the partner proteins Mus81 and Eme1.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Muts Homologue MSH4 Physically Interacts with Von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor-Binding Protein 11
    [CANCER RESEARCH 63, 865–872, February 15, 2003] Human MutS Homologue MSH4 Physically Interacts with von Hippel-Lindau Tumor Suppressor-binding Protein 11 Chengtao Her,2 Xiling Wu, Michael D. Griswold, and Feng Zhou School of Molecular Biosciences and Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-4660 [C. H., X. W., M. D. G.], and Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 [F. Z.] ABSTRACT human MMR genes are linked to the pathogenesis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and sporadic tumors Increasing evidence indicated that the protein factors involved in DNA associated with microsatellite instability (1). Eukaryotic MutS mismatch repair (MMR) possess meiotic functions beyond the scope of DNA mismatch correction. The important roles of MMR components in homologous proteins MSH2, MSH3, and MSH6 are proteins meiotic processes have been highlighted by the recent identification of two known to participate in DNA MMR through the actions of their additional members of the mammalian MutS homologs, MSH4 and heterodimeric complexes consisting of either MSH2-MSH3 or MSH5. Mammalian MSH4 and MSH5 proteins form a heterodimeric MSH2-MSH6, in which the MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer recognizes complex and play an important role in the meiotic processes. As a step both single-base mismatches and small loops formed by insertions forward to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying or deletions in the DNA, whereas the MSH2-MSH3 heterodimer the roles of these two mammalian MutS homologues, here we have iden- only recognizes small insertions and deletions (3, 4). tified von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor-binding protein 1 Recent evidence demonstrates that eukaryotes contained a sep- (VBP1) as an interacting protein partner for human MSH4 (hMSH4).
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics of Azoospermia
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Genetics of Azoospermia Francesca Cioppi , Viktoria Rosta and Csilla Krausz * Department of Biochemical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy; francesca.cioppi@unifi.it (F.C.); viktoria.rosta@unifi.it (V.R.) * Correspondence: csilla.krausz@unifi.it Abstract: Azoospermia affects 1% of men, and it can be due to: (i) hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction, (ii) primary quantitative spermatogenic disturbances, (iii) urogenital duct obstruction. Known genetic factors contribute to all these categories, and genetic testing is part of the routine diagnostic workup of azoospermic men. The diagnostic yield of genetic tests in azoospermia is different in the different etiological categories, with the highest in Congenital Bilateral Absence of Vas Deferens (90%) and the lowest in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA) due to primary testicular failure (~30%). Whole- Exome Sequencing allowed the discovery of an increasing number of monogenic defects of NOA with a current list of 38 candidate genes. These genes are of potential clinical relevance for future gene panel-based screening. We classified these genes according to the associated-testicular histology underlying the NOA phenotype. The validation and the discovery of novel NOA genes will radically improve patient management. Interestingly, approximately 37% of candidate genes are shared in human male and female gonadal failure, implying that genetic counselling should be extended also to female family members of NOA patients. Keywords: azoospermia; infertility; genetics; exome; NGS; NOA; Klinefelter syndrome; Y chromosome microdeletions; CBAVD; congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism Citation: Cioppi, F.; Rosta, V.; Krausz, C. Genetics of Azoospermia. 1. Introduction Int. J. Mol. Sci.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing and Zipping: Molecular Duties of the ZMM Proteins in Meiosis Alexandra Pyatnitskaya, Valérie Borde, Arnaud De Muyt
    Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis Alexandra Pyatnitskaya, Valérie Borde, Arnaud de Muyt To cite this version: Alexandra Pyatnitskaya, Valérie Borde, Arnaud de Muyt. Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis. Chromosoma, Springer Verlag, 2019, 10.1007/s00412-019-00714-8. hal-02413016 HAL Id: hal-02413016 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02413016 Submitted on 16 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Manuscript Click here to access/download;Manuscript;review ZMM Chromosoma2019_Revised#2.docx Click here to view linked References Crossing and zipping: molecular duties of the ZMM proteins in meiosis 1 2 3 1,2 1,2,* 1,2,* 4 Alexandra Pyatnitskaya , Valérie Borde and Arnaud De Muyt 5 1 Institut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR3244, Paris, France. 6 7 2 Paris Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. 8 9 *Valérie Borde, [email protected]; Arnaud De Muyt, [email protected] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Keywords : meiosis, crossover, recombination, synaptonemal complex, ZMM 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 1 65 Abstract 1 2 Accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on the ability 3 4 of meiotic cells to promote reciprocal exchanges between parental DNA strands, known 5 as crossovers (COs).
    [Show full text]
  • Coding and Noncoding Variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B Affect Recombination Rate in Cattle
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Coding and noncoding variants in HFM1, MLH3, MSH4, MSH5, RNF212, and RNF212B affect recombination rate in cattle Naveen Kumar Kadri,1 Chad Harland,1,2 Pierre Faux,1 Nadine Cambisano,1,3 Latifa Karim,1,3 Wouter Coppieters,1,3 Sébastien Fritz,4,5 Erik Mullaart,6 Denis Baurain,7 Didier Boichard,5 Richard Spelman,2 Carole Charlier,1 Michel Georges,1 and Tom Druet1 1Unit of Animal Genomics, GIGA-R & Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège (B34), 4000 Liège, Belgium; 2Livestock Improvement Corporation, Newstead, 3240 Hamilton, New Zealand; 3Genomics Platform, GIGA, University of Liège (B34), 4000 Liège, Belgium; 4Allice, 75012 Paris, France; 5GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France; 6CRV BV, 6800 AL Arnhem, the Netherlands; 7InBioS-Eukaryotic Phylogenomics, Department of Life Sciences and PhytoSYSTEMS, University of Liège (B22), 4000 Liège, Belgium We herein study genetic recombination in three cattle populations from France, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. We identify 2,395,177 crossover (CO) events in 94,516 male gametes, and 579,996 CO events in 25,332 female gametes. The average number of COs was found to be larger in males (23.3) than in females (21.4). The heritability of global recombi- nation rate (GRR) was estimated at 0.13 in males and 0.08 in females, with a genetic correlation of 0.66 indicating that shared variants are influencing GRR in both sexes. A genome-wide association study identified seven quantitative trait loci (QTL) for GRR.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Molecular Genetics Chapter 8. Recombination of DNA CHAPTER 8 RECOMBINATION of DNA
    Working with Molecular Genetics Chapter 8. Recombination of DNA CHAPTER 8 RECOMBINATION OF DNA The previous chapter on mutation and repair of DNA dealt mainly with small changes in DNA sequence, usually single base pairs, resulting from errors in replication or damage to DNA. The DNA sequence of a chromosome can change in large segments as well, by the processes of recombination and transposition. Recombination is the production of new DNA molecule(s) from two parental DNA molecules or different segments of the same DNA molecule; this will be the topic of this chapter. Transposition is a highly specialized form of recombination in which a segment of DNA moves from one location to another, either on the same chromosome or a different chromosome; this will be discussed in the next chapter. Types and examples of recombination At least four types of naturally occurring recombination have been identified in living organisms (Fig. 8.1). General or homologous recombination occurs between DNA molecules of very similar sequence, such as homologous chromosomes in diploid organisms. General recombination can occur throughout the genome of diploid organisms, using one or a small number of common enzymatic pathways. This chapter will be concerned almost entirely with general recombination. Illegitimate or nonhomologous recombination occurs in regions where no large- scale sequence similarity is apparent, e.g. translocations between different chromosomes or deletions that remove several genes along a chromosome. However, when the DNA sequence at the breakpoints for these events is analyzed, short regions of sequence similarity are found in some cases. For instance, recombination between two similar genes that are several million bp apart can lead to deletion of the intervening genes in somatic cells.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Role of Chromosomal Rearrangements in Evolution
    On the role of chromosomal rearrangements in evolution: Reconstruction of genome reshuffling in rodents and analysis of Robertsonian fusions in a house mouse chromosomal polymorphism zone by Laia Capilla Pérez A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Biology Supervisors: Dra. Aurora Ruiz-Herrera Moreno and Dr. Jacint Ventura Queija Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB) Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia Departament de Biologia Animal, Biologia Vegetal i Ecologia Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Supervisor Supervisor PhD candidate Aurora Ruiz-Herrera Moreno Jacint Ventura Queija Laia Capilla Pérez Bellaterra, 2015 A la mare Al pare Al mano “Visto a la luz de la evolución, la biología es, quizás, la ciencia más satisfactoria e inspiradora. Sin esa luz, se convierte en un montón de hechos varios, algunos de ellos interesantes o curiosos, pero sin formar ninguna visión conjunta.” Theodosius Dobzhansky “La evolución es tan creativa. Por eso tenemos jirafas.” Kurt Vonnegut This thesis was supported by grants from: • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CGL2010-15243 and CGL2010- 20170). • Generalitat de Catalunya, GRQ 1057. • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. Beca de Formación de Personal Investigador (FPI) (BES-2011-047722). • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. Beca para la realización de estancias breves (EEBB-2011-07350). Covers designed by cintamontserrat.blogspot.com INDEX Abstract 15-17 Acronyms 19-20 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 21-60 1.1 Chromosomal rearrangements
    [Show full text]
  • Protein-Assisted Room-Temperature Assembly of Rigid, Immobile Holliday Junctions and Hierarchical DNA Nanostructures
    molecules Article Protein-Assisted Room-Temperature Assembly of Rigid, Immobile Holliday Junctions and Hierarchical DNA Nanostructures 1,2, 3,4, 1, Saminathan Ramakrishnan y, Sivaraman Subramaniam y, Charlotte Kielar z, Guido Grundmeier 1 , A. Francis Stewart 3,4 and Adrian Keller 1,* 1 Technical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany; [email protected] (S.R.); [email protected] (C.K.); [email protected] (G.G.) 2 Structural Biophysics Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA 3 Biotechnology Center, Department of Genomics, Technische Universität Dresden, Tatzberg 47-51, 01307 Dresden, Germany; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (A.F.S.) 4 Cluster of Excellence Physics of Life, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Present address: Institute of Resource Ecology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, z Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany. Academic Editor: Ramon Eritja Received: 29 September 2020; Accepted: 30 October 2020; Published: 3 November 2020 Abstract: Immobile Holliday junctions represent not only the most fundamental building block of structural DNA nanotechnology but are also of tremendous importance for the in vitro investigation of genetic recombination and epigenetics. Here, we present a detailed study on the room-temperature assembly of immobile Holliday junctions with the help of the single-strand annealing protein Redβ. Individual DNA single strands are initially coated with protein monomers and subsequently hybridized to form a rigid blunt-ended four-arm junction. We investigate the efficiency of this approach for different DNA/protein ratios, as well as for different DNA sequence lengths.
    [Show full text]