DOCSLIB.ORG

A Century of Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Century of Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium A Century of Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium Oliver Mayo CSIRO Livestock Industries, Adelaide, Australia ardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) is the state of essentially stable in genetical terms: a system, like Hthe genotypic frequency of two alleles of one the genome of a population, is at equilibrium in autosomal gene locus after one discrete generation time when no net change occurs or is expected to of random mating in an indefinitely large population: occur from its state at that time. Furthermore, equi- if the alleles are A and a with frequencies p and libria can be stable, meaning that when a small q (=1-p), then the equilibrium gene frequencies are displacement occurs, the system is expected to simply p and q and the equilibrium genotypic fre- return to the equilibrium. 2 2 quencies for AA, Aa and aa are p , 2pq and q . It was Soon after the rediscovery of Mendel’s remarkable independently identified in 1908 by G. H. Hardy and work in 1900, interest arose in the properties of W. Weinberg after earlier attempts by W. E. Castle Mendelian genes in populations; this was the dawn of and K. Pearson. Weinberg, well known for pioneer- population genetics. Castle (1903) and Pearson ing studies of twins, made many important (1903a, 1903b) were among the first to investigate contributions to genetics, especially human genet- these. As Edwards (in press) has pointed out, Castle ics. Existence of this equilibrium provides a did not derive a generalization equivalent to reference point against which the effects of selec- Pearson’s, and will be considered no further in this tion, linkage, mutation, inbreeding and chance can paper. be detected and estimated. Its discovery marked Mendel (1865) had hypothesized that inheritance the initiation of population genetics. of a trait was particulate, that the units of inheritance did not change from generation to generation, that they were contributed equally by an organism’s two Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) is the state of parents, and that each parent contributed its unit at the genotypic frequency of two alleles of one gene random from the two it contained. He had shown locus after one generation of random mating in an that a cross between two pure-breeding lines, termed indefinitely large population with discrete genera- A and a in regard to some trait, gave a first genera- tions, in the absence of mutation and selection: if the tion resembling one of the two parents (A) identically alleles are A and a with frequencies p and q (= 1-p), and that crosses among members of this first genera- then the equilibrium gene frequencies are just p and q tion gave a ratio of 3:1 of the two parental types, the and the equilibrium genotypic frequencies for AA, Aa more frequent type being the same as this first genera- and aa are p2, 2pq and q2. Thus, there is equilibrium tion (A). He had described the first generation type as at both the allelic and the genotypic level. Not exces- dominant, the other as recessive. sively fancifully, one could compare this Mendel produced a model of the following kind: Hardy–Weinberg rule with Newton’s first law of the genetic make-up of the two parental lines was AA motion: a physical body will remain at rest, or con- and aa respectively, and their offspring were Aa. tinue to move at a constant velocity, unless an 1 Crossing two Aa gave, by the binomial expansion ( ⁄2A external force acts upon it. If such stability is the rule, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + ⁄2a)( ⁄2A + ⁄2a), ⁄4AA, ⁄4Aa, ⁄4aA, ⁄4aa. If Aa = aA then it provides the basis for the detection and estima- (since the units of inheritance are unchanged), and if tion of the effects on the population of ‘the thousand Aa resembles AA exactly (the phenomenon of domi- natural shocks the flesh is heir to’, including natural nance, deduced from the disappearance of a in the and artificial selection, mutation, assortative mating, cross of the two lines), then the proportions of the migration, inbreeding and random sampling (through 3 1 phenotypes A:a will be ⁄4: ⁄4. Mendel made further finite population size). confirmatory crosses, for example showing that two Each word in the topic concept deserves explica- thirds of the A types were Aa and one third were AA. tion: Hardy was a notable pure mathematician, Mendel did not consider directly what would Weinberg was a pioneering human geneticist and happen in a population of an organism, but this was doctor to the poor who made a special contribution to twin studies, and the concept of equilibrium is Received 19 February, 2008; accepted 3 March, 2008. simple and attractive to those in permanent disequi- Address for correspondence: Oliver Mayo, CSIRO Livestock librium, like human beings. The concept made Industries, PO Box 100401 Adelaide BC, SA 5000, Australia. E-mail: immediately clear that human populations were [email protected] Twin Research and Human Genetics Volume 11 Number 3 pp. 249–256 249 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.234, on 30 Sep 2021 at 04:27:46, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.11.3.249 Oliver Mayo essential if evolutionary phenomena were to be the frequencies of the three possible genotypes are as explained or even studied at the level of the hypothesized shown: ‘essential character’, as Mendel called his fundamental A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 particles of inheritance. (The name ‘gene’ was introduced PQR 1 in about 1905 by Wilhelm Johannsen, as an abbrevia- Then the frequencies of the alleles A1 and A2 are P+ ⁄2Q 1 tion of Darwin’s and De Vries’s ‘pangen’.) and ⁄2Q + R respectively. Call these p and q respec- Pearson immediately saw that dominance/ tively. Call this population the parental generation. recessiveness was not essential to the dynamics of the Some very simple algebra shows that the frequencies model, but was rather an additional assumption of of the three genotypes in the offspring produced by Mendel’s. He generalized the model by removing this random mating among this parental generation will be assumption, and also began the analysis of multiple A1A1 A1A2 A2A2 1 2 1 1 1 2 independent genes. (P + ⁄2Q) 2(P + ⁄2Q)( ⁄2Q + R)(⁄2Q + R) On his model, the first two generations described = p2 = 2pq = q2 above would be It is also simple to show that these genotypic frequen- (AA´) × (aa´) = (A+A´)(a+a´) = cies, which are also those chosen by pairwise sampling (Aa) + (Aa´) + (A´a) + (A´a´), of gametes at random in the population, will be the same in the next generation. (At this equilibrium, representing the parents, the gametes and the offspring Q2 =4PR.) The process of pairwise sampling is simple in turn. If the gametes identified by the prime ´ are binomial sampling with replacement, justifiable actually identical, that is A = A´ and so on, then this because the populations of gametes can be regarded as second generation is identical, Aa. This can then be indefinitely large. For a careful and complete mathe- extended to multiple independent genes. Pearson matical account of HWE, see Edwards (2000). (1903b) wrote: The English pure mathematician G. H. Hardy If these hybrids now breed at random and are equally (1908), notable for contributions to number theory fertile among themselves, segregation takes place. If and analysis, simply showed that the relationship the process of random mating with equal fertility be given above would hold; he had been asked what continued generation by generation, what further would happen to gene and genotype frequencies in a changes, if any, take place, and what are the laws of population mating at random, and gave the answer. inheritance within such a population? (p. 506) He participated no further in population genetics. His conclusion was ‘that when the members of this seg- Diaconis (2002) has speculated that Hardy had ‘a true regating population cross at random the population antipathy to the subject’ of probability, which could accurately reproduces itself, and supposing no artificial, explain his failure to contribute further, but it could natural or reproductive selection takes place, a stable equally well be explained by his love of pure mathe- population or ‘race’ is created, which is permanent and matics and total lack of interest in applications. shows a permanent proportional frequency for each Hardy’s place in mathematical history is secure; that sub-class of the population’. From this important con- in genetical history minor but significant. For an clusion, Pearson went on to calculate parent-offspring accessible portrait, see Snow (1967) and Hardy’s own correlations, rOP, and other attributes of the quantita- memoir (1940), and for detailed comments on Hardy’s tive inheritance which he was developing. (1908) paper, see Edwards (in press). Unfortunately, having pointed out that he did not need Weinberg (1908), who was a human geneticist of 1 Mendel’s hypothesis of dominance, he calculated rOP = ⁄3 the first rank, though widely regarded in his own and noted that this was not in agreement with empirical country as an Armenarzt (a doctor employed by a observations which lay round 0.5. For this and other local authority to treat the indigent, an honorable reasons he abandoned particulate inheritance of the calling, perhaps, but hardly a sign of success in his Mendelian kind. Had he assumed that the heterozygote career), did much more work on the topic. 1 was intermediate, he would have obtained rOP = ⁄2. After the publication of Hardy’s note, Pearson (1909a, Weinberg’s Contribution 1909b) obtained correct results, without referring to his Wilhelm Weinberg was born in Stuttgart in 1862, was earlier errors as such.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8Th International Workshop on the History of Human Genetics: the History of Eugenics and the Evolution of Techniques in Human Genetics
    8th International Workshop on the History of Human Genetics: The History of Eugenics and The Evolution of Techniques in Human Genetics Date: June 4-5, 2020 Place: Berlin Messe Cube Messedamm 26, 14055 Berlin, Germany https://www.messe-berlin.de/en/ Thursday June 4, 2020 History of Eugenics 14.00 - 14.30 15 Welcome and Heike Petermann: Otmar von Verschuer and Human Genetics in Germany Introduction 14.30 - 15.30 75 Session 1 1. Eugenics in Germany Bernd Gausemeier, Hannover (FRG): Exploring the formation of human genetics with Wilhelm Weinberg Susanne Doetz, Magdeburg (FRG): Eugenics in the GDR From Submitted abstracts. 15.30 - 16.00 30 Coffee Break 16.00 - 17.30 90 Session 2 2. Eugenics International Andrew Rushton, Flemington (USA): Bibliometrics and Eminence of British Geneticists. From submitted abstracts Evening Programme (separate registration required): 18.15 - 19.45 90 Guided Tour Jens P. Fürste, Berlin (FRG): Walk through University in Berlin-Dahlem 20.00 - 22.00 Dinner At the Harnack-Haus Friday June 5, 2020 Human Genetics in Berlin 09.00 - 09.15 15 Welcome Heike Petermann, Münster (FRG) 09.15 - 10.45 90 Session 3 3. Human Genetics after 1945 in Berlin Karl Sperling, Berlin (FRG): History of Human Genetics in Berlin-West. Olaf Riess, Tübingen (FRG), Regine Witkowski, Berlin (FRG): History of Human Genetics in Berlin East. Stefan Mundlos, Berlin (FRG): Human Genetics in Berlin today 11.00 - 11.30 30 Coffee Break 11.30 - 13.00 90 Session 4 History of Techniques in Human Genetics Didier Goidin, Paris (FRA): Evolution of Array-CGH. Nicole Fleischer, Boston, MA (USA): Evolution of Next-Generation- Phenotyping.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    Copyright 1999 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove Hardy, Weinberg and Language Impediments James F. Crow Genetics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 HE Hardy-Weinberg law is the cornerstone of dip- also, even more crucial, that Mendelism and Darwin's Tloid population genetics. Yet it seems trivially obvi- idea of continuous evolution were compatibleº (Pro- ous, a routine application of the binomial theorem. And vine 1971, p. 85). Yule's statement was a curious slip indeed it was so regarded by Hardy when he wrote his for a man who had introduced so much clarity into famous paper, a masterpiece of clarity: the rancorous debates between the mendelists and the To the Editor of Science: I am reluctant to intrude in biometricians. I suppose that even the greatest are enti- a discussion concerning matters of which I have no expert tled to one mental lapse. knowledge, and I should have expected the very simple When I began teaching genetics, this principle was point which I wish to make to have been familiar to called Hardy's law. Later, Stern (1943) called attention biologists. However, some remarks of Mr. Udny Yule, to to an article of Weinberg (1908), who showed the same which Mr. R. C. Punnett has called my attention, suggest that it may still be worth making.. principle at the same time (for an English translation of Suppose that Aa is a pair of Mendelian characters, A Weinberg's paper, see Boyer 1963, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of Eugenics in 20Th-Century Germany HUMAN -MGENETICS Paul Weindling KEDUCATION
    Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52:643-649, 1993 The Survival of Eugenics in 20th-Century Germany HUMAN -MGENETICS Paul Weindling KEDUCATION Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxfor After the Second World War, a U.S. intelligence ser- genics. The process of the emancipation of human ge- vices officer investigating the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute netics from eugenics that Kevles (1985) dates as occur- for Anthropology and Human Heredity commented ring from the 1930s in Britain and the United States is that one German anthropologist was 1,000 times more much harder to date for Germany. Weingart sees its guilty than an ordinary SS man (Weindling 1989). Yet, origins as occurring in the early 1940s, but the comple- despite the Nuremberg medical trials and denazifica- tion of the breakthrough of a new discipline of human tion tribunals, there was remarkable continuity of eu- genetics in Germany as occurring only in the 1960s. genically minded geneticists, who, after 1945, were ap- The aim of this paper is to scrutinize this claim. I will pointed to newly founded chairs and to institutes of suggest that the history of human genetics in Germany human genetics (Koch 1985). At the same time certain did not begin in the 1960s, in 1945, or even in the late leading geneticists (notably, Hans Nachtsheim) were 1930s but that its origins were earlier-i.e., in the era of concerned that the reaction against Nazi racism should rediscovery of the Mendelian patterns of hereditary. not lead to the wholesale condemnation of eugenics, so Both before and after 1945 human geneticists were in- that eugenic prescriptions could continue to be derived volved in eugenics movements, and human genetics was from human genetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Weinberg's Early Contribution to Segregation Analysis
    PERSPECTIVES Wilhelm Weinberg’s Early Contribution to Segregation Analysis Alan Stark* and Eugene Seneta*,1 *School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia ABSTRACT Wilhelm Weinberg (1862–1937) is a largely forgotten pioneer of human and medical genetics. His name is linked with that of the English mathematician G. H. Hardy in the Hardy–Weinberg law, pervasive in textbooks on population genetics since it expresses stability over generations of zygote frequencies AA, Aa, aa under random mating. One of Weinberg’s signal contributions, in an article whose centenary we celebrate, was to verify that Mendel’s segregation law still held in the setting of human heredity, contrary to the then-prevailing view of William Bateson (1861–1926), the leading Mendelian geneticist of the time. Specifically, Weinberg verified that the proportion of recessive offspring genotypes aa in human parental crossings Aa · Aa (that is, the segregation ratio for such ¼ 1 a setting) was indeed p 4. We focus in a nontechnical way on his procedure, called the simple sib method, and on the heated controversy with Felix Bernstein (1878–1956) in the 1920s and 1930s over work stimulated by Weinberg’s article. ORE than a decade after the rediscovery of Mendelism, In the first decade of the 20th century when the im- Mthere was controversy over whether human inheritance plications of Mendel’s experiments were being realized, actually followed Mendel’s laws. Wilhelm Weinberg (1862– Weinberg had an established medical practice in Stuttgart. 1937) was a prominent member of the German “school” of At about that time he started to produce an impressive list of genetics in the first third of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hardy–Weinberg Law (1908)
    Chapter 11 The Hardy–Weinberg law (1908) Godfrey Harold Hardy was born in 1877 in Surrey, England. His parents were teach- ers. He studied mathematics at Trinity College, Cambridge University, from 1896, became a fellow of his college in 1900 and a lecturer in mathematics in 1906. After a first book on The Integration of Functions of a Single Variable (1905), he pub- lished in 1908 A Course of Pure Mathematics, which was reedited many times and translated to many foreign languages. Fig. 11.1 Hardy (1877–1947) At that time, the rediscovery of Mendel’s work had raised some doubts. Some biologists wondered why the dominant characters did not become more frequent from generation to generation. Reginald Punnett, who had written a book entitled Mendelism in 1905, asked the question to Hardy, with whom he played cricket in Cambridge. Hardy wrote his solution in an article on “Mendelian proportions in a mixed population”, which was published in 1908. To simplify the analysis, he imag- ined the situation of a large population where the choice of the sexual partner would be random. Moreover he restricted his attention to just two factors (or “alleles”) A and a, A being dominant and a recessive. For generation n,letpn be the frequency N. Bacaer,¨ A Short History of Mathematical Population Dynamics, 59 DOI 10.1007/978-0-85729-115-8 11, © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011 60 11 The Hardy–Weinberg law (1908) of the “genotype” AA,2qn that of Aa and rn that of aa. Of course, pn +2qn +rn = 1. Hardy assumed also that none of these genotypes led to an excess of mortality or to a decrease in fertility when compared to the two other genotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development, Rise, Fall, and Return of the Concept of Anticipation in Hereditary Disease
    Coming Full Circle: The Development, Rise, Fall, and Return of the Concept of Anticipation in Hereditary Disease by Judith Ellen Friedman B.Sc., University of Alberta, 1994 B.A. University of Alberta, 1995 M.A. University of Alberta, 1997 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of History © Judith Ellen Friedman, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ISBN: 978-0-494-52946-1 ii Coming Full Circle: The Development, Rise, Fall, and Return of the Concept of Anticipation in Hereditary Disease by Judith Ellen Friedman B.Sc., University of Alberta, 1994 B.A. University of Alberta, 1995 M.A. University of Alberta, 1997 Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory Blue, Supervisor (Department of History) Dr. Angus McLaren, Departmental Member (Department of History) Dr. David Zimmerman, Departmental Member (Department of History) Dr. Robert Reid, Outside Member (Department of Biology) Dr. Michael Ashwood-Smith, Outside Member (Department of Biology) Dr. Robert Olby, External Examiner (Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Gregory Blue, Supervisor (Department of History) Dr. Angus McLaren, Departmental Member (Department of History) Dr. David Zimmerman, Departmental Member (Department of History) Dr. Robert Reid, Outside Member (Department of Biology) Dr. Michael Ashwood-Smith, Outside Member (Department of Biology) Dr. Robert Olby, External Examiner (Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh) ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the history of the creation and development of the concept of anticipation, a pattern of heredity found in several diseases (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural History of Heredity IV: Heredity in the Century of the Gene
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 2008 PREPRINT 343 Conference A Cultural History of Heredity IV: Heredity in the Century of the Gene Table of Contents Introduction Staffan Müller-Wille, Hans-Jörg Rheinberger and John Dupré 3 Leaving Inheritance behind: Wilhelm Johannsen and the Politics of Mendelism Staffan Müller-Wille 7 Mendelian Factors and Human Disease: A Conversation Jean Paul Gaudillière & Ilana Löwy 19 Heredity without Mendelism: Theory and Practice of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the Netherlands 1900-1950 Bert Theunissen 27 Innovation and Ownership in Living Products: Animals and Fruits in the United States, the 1870s to 1930 Daniel J. Kevles 51 Coalition and Opposition: Heredity, Culture, and the Boundaries of Anthropology in the Work of Alfred L. Kroeber Maria E. Kronfeldner 61 Comments on Daniel Kevles and Maria Kronfeldner’s Papers Edna Suárez 77 Producing Identity, Industrializing Purity: Elements for a Cultural History of Genetics Christophe Bonneuil 81 Mendelism and Agriculture in the First Decades of the XXth Century in Mexico Ana Barahona 111 Herbert Spencer Jennings, Heredity, and Protozoa as Model Organisms, 1908-1918 Judy Johns Schloegel 129 Clones, Pure Lines, and Heredity: The Work of Victor Jollos Christina Brandt 139 Pedigree vs. Mendelism. Concepts of Heredity in Psychiatry before and after 1900 Bernd Gausemeier 149 Pedigree Charts as Tools to Visualize Inherited Disease in Progressive Era America Philip Wilson 163 Biohistorical Narratives of Jewish history. Contextualizing the Studies of Wil- helm Nussbaum (1896-1985) Veronika Lipphardt 191 William Bateson’s Pre- and Post-Mendelian Research Program in ‘Heredity and Development’ Marsha L.
    [Show full text]
  • Going on an Antedate
    Evolutionary Anthropology 16:204–209 (2007) CROTCHETS & QUIDDITIES Going on an Antedate A strange history of imperfect perfect proportions. KENNETH M. WEISS AND JEFFREY A. KURLAND In the mid-1700s, the English lan- tion from which leads to the changes explained the inheritance patterns of guage was rather out of control. In that define evolution. However, since quantitative traits like skin color. the absence of a satisfactory refer- it will be on the test, many students Mendel’s ideas were different. He ence, word meanings were unclear. (even those who are awake) see HW was trained to think that organic na- Even Shakespeare had already only as an algebraic threat to their ture follows the same laws as does become somewhat obscure to most grade-point average. As one student the physical world of fundamental readers. So the intellectual-about- griped, ‘‘Let me get this straight. particles.4–6 Inheritance must follow town, Samuel Johnson, convinced When nothing happens . nothing mathematical rules. He used hybrid- investors that an English dictionary changes? Duh.’’ ization experiments to deduce those based on improved principles would Over decades of textbooks, HW rules from the relative frequency of be commercially successful.1–3 Exist- appears to be taught largely because alternative traits such as green ver- ing dictionaries were based on ‘‘a it always has been taught. It’s part of sus yellow peas. He succeeded genealogy of sentiments,’’ as author our pedagogic heritage, but its mean- because he deliberately chose traits had copied author over time. Instead, ing and rationale have become hid- known to breed true in different Johnson argued for an approach that den in the dusty volumes of past strains of peas, and he showed that reflected ‘‘intellectual history,’’ a term journal articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics in the Madhouse
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Data-Heredity-MadnessIntroduction INTRODUCTION Data-Heredity-Madness A Medical-Social Dream The plan of the institution, the budget, the rules for its administration were not calculated merely to pursue cures for the mentally ill; science itself was also to be advanced. —Report of a Rhine Asylum Committee (1830) Heredity has an undeniably great importance for mental illness and psychical deficiencies. So it is no accident that attention was focused earlier and more intensely on the inheritance question in psychiatry than in any other area of medicine. —Wilhelm Schallmayer (1918) Genetics has been supported by compelling images. We think first of DNA, whose helical structure, announced in 1953, is still often exalted as the secret of life. For half a century before that, the sci- ence of heredity was identified with neat diagrams of green and yellow or smooth and wrinkled peas bred by Gregor Mendel in the garden of an Augustinian monastery.1 The mutant eyes or wings of the fruit fly also assumed an iconic form. Images like these distract us from a science of mass reproduction. The agricultural breeding factories that already had sprung up before anyone cared about Mendel, and the industrialized laboratories of recombinant DNA, have never been appealing in the way of a ladder swirling heaven- ward. Graceful curves can only be part of the story. Let the reader cast an eye over the great filing cabinets of data from armies, pris- ons, immigration offices, census bureaus, and insurance offices that have been brought to bear on the topic of human heredity.
    [Show full text]
  • CURT STERN August 30, 1902-October 23, 1981
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES C U R T S TERN 1902—1981 A Biographical Memoir by J AMES V. NEEL Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1987 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. CURT STERN August 30, 1902-October 23, 1981 BY JAMES V. NEEL HERE HAVE BEEN three remarkable periods in the his- Ttory of modern genetics. The first of these, in the early years of this century, encompasses the rediscovery and confirmation of Mendel's findings and the enunciation of the chromosomal theory of inheritance. The second period is characterized by a concatenation of discoveries regarding the more precise mechanisms of chromosomal behavior, largely based on the use of Drosophila and emanating from the "fly room" at Columbia University. The third is the period in which we now find ourselves, initiated in the 1940s by the seminal observations of Avery and collaborators and the later phage work demonstrating that the essential genetic material was DNA and the demonstration, using Neurospora, that genes have essential and specific roles in the synthesis of pro- teins. This was followed by the elucidation of the structure of DNA, leading to a cascade of discoveries concerning DNA fine structure and how it can be manipulated. Each of these flowerings dominated the conceptual biological thinking of the time. NOTE: This memoir is an expanded version of a manuscript published in the An- nual Review of Genetics. I am deeply indebted to the many people who have contrib- uted their remembrances and perspective to the writing of this memoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Introduction and Breeding
    United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 150 Years of Research June 2013 at the United States Department of Agriculture: Plant Introduction and Breeding i Cover photo: The stately building that once housed the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Washington, D.C., ca. 1890. (This photo is preserved in the USDA History Collection, Special Collections, National Agricultural Library.) ii Abstract Griesbach, R.J. 2013. 150 Years of Research at the While supplies last, single copies of this publication United States Department of Agriculture: Plant can be obtained at no cost from Robert J. Griesbach, Introduction and Breeding. U.S. Department USDA-ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1159, Beltsville, MD Washington, DC. 20705; or by email at [email protected]. The U.S. Department of Agriculture celebrated Copies of this publication may be purchased in various its 150th anniversary in 2012. One of the primary formats (microfiche, photocopy, CD, print on demand) functions of the USDA when it was established in 1862 from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 was “to procure, propagate, and distribute among the people new Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (800) 553- and valuable seeds and plants.” The U.S. Government first 6847, www.ntis.gov. became involved in new plant introductions in 1825 when President John Quincy Adams directed U.S. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits Consuls to forward rare plants and seeds to the State discrimination in all its programs and activities on the Department for propagation and distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reality Check on Hardy–Weinberg
    Twin Research and Human Genetics Volume 16 Number 4 pp. 782–789 C The Authors 2013 doi:10.1017/thg.2013.40 A Reality Check on Hardy–Weinberg Alan E. Stark and Eugene Seneta School of Mathematics and Statistics FO7, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia G. H. Hardy (1877–1947) and Wilhelm Weinberg (1862–1937) had very different lives, but in the minds of geneticists, the two are inextricably linked through the ownership of an apparently simple law called the Hardy–Weinberg law. We demonstrate that the simplicity is more apparent than real. Hardy derived the well-known trio of frequencies {q2, 2pq, p2} with a concise demonstration, whereas for Weinberg it was the prelude to an ingenious examination of the inheritance of twinning in man. Hardy’s recourse to an identity relating to the distribution of types among offspring following random mating, rather than an identity relating to the mating matrix, may be the reason why he did not realize that Hardy–Weinberg equi- librium can be reached and sustained with non-random mating. The phrase ‘random mating’ always comes up in reference to the law. The elusive nature of this phrase is part of the reason for the misunderstandings that occur but also because, as we explain, mathematicians are able to use it in a different way from the man-in-the-street. We question the unthinking appeal to random mating as a model and explanation of the distribution of genotypes even when they are close to Hardy–Weinberg proportions. Such sustained proportions are possible under non-random mating.
    [Show full text]