DOCSLIB.ORG

Schaffer Collateral Inputs to CA1 Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons Follow Different Connectivity Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schaffer Collateral Inputs to CA1 Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons Follow Different Connectivity Rules This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. A link to any extended data will be provided when the final version is posted online. Research Articles: Systems/Circuits Schaffer collateral inputs to CA1 excitatory and inhibitory neurons follow different connectivity rules Osung Kwon1, Linqing Feng1, Shaul Druckmann2 and Jinhyun Kim1,3 1Center for Functional Connectomics, Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Korea 2Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA 3Division of Bio-Medical Science & Technology, KIST-School, University of Science and Technology, Korea DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0155-18.2018 Received: 20 January 2018 Revised: 12 March 2018 Accepted: 19 April 2018 Published: 4 May 2018 Author Contributions: J.K. conceived the project and designed the experiments. O.K. and J.K. performed the molecular biology, animal surgery, immunostaining and imaging. L.F. and S.D. designed and performed all statistical data analysis. L.F., S.D., and J.K. wrote the paper. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. We thank Dr. Yong Chul Bae and Jin Young Bae for their assistance with immuno-EM. This work was supported by the KIST Institutional Program (Project No. 2E27850). The authors declare no completing financial interests. Correspondence should be addressed to Jinhyun Kim, Center for Functional Connectomics (CFC), L7-7205, Brain Science Institute at the Korea Institute of Science & Technology (KIST), 39-1 Hawolgokdong, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02792, Korea; phone: +82-2-958-7225, [email protected] Cite as: J. Neurosci ; 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0155-18.2018 Alerts: Sign up at www.jneurosci.org/cgi/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Accepted manuscripts are peer-reviewed but have not been through the copyediting, formatting, or proofreading process. Copyright © 2018 the authors 1 Schaffer collateral inputs to CA1 excitatory and inhibitory neurons follow different 2 connectivity rules 3 4 [Short title] Different synapse connectivity rules in excitatory and inhibitory neurons 5 6 Osung Kwon1,4, Linqing Feng1,4, Shaul Druckmann2, and Jinhyun Kim1,3* 7 8 1Center for Functional Connectomics, Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and 9 Technology (KIST), Korea; 2Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 10 USA; and 3Division of Bio-Medical Science & Technology, KIST-School, University of Science 11 and Technology, Korea 12 4Co-first author 13 *Correspondence should be addressed to Jinhyun Kim, Center for Functional Connectomics 14 (CFC), L7-7205, Brain Science Institute at the Korea Institute of Science & Technology (KIST), 15 39-1 Hawolgokdong, Seongbukgu, Seoul 02792, Korea; phone: +82-2-958-7225, 16 [email protected] 17 18 19 x 30 pages 20 x 7 Figures, 1 Extended Table, 1 Extended Movie 21 x 186 words in Abstract, 641 words in Introduction, and 1597 words in Discussion 22 23 24 Acknowledgements 25 We thank Dr. Yong Chul Bae and Jin Young Bae for their assistance with immuno-EM. This 26 work was supported by the KIST Institutional Program (Project No. 2E27850). The authors 27 declare no completing financial interests. 28 29 30 31 32 1 33 Abstract 34 35 36 Neural circuits, governed by a complex interplay between excitatory and inhibitory neurons, are 37 the substrate for information processing, and the organization of synaptic connectivity in neural 38 network is an important determinant of circuit function. Here, we analyzed the fine structure of 39 connectivity in hippocampal CA1 excitatory and inhibitory neurons innervated by Schaffer 40 collaterals (SCs) using mGRASP in male mice. Our previous study revealed spatially structured 41 synaptic connectivity between CA3-CA1 pyramidal cells (PCs). Surprisingly, parvalbumin- 42 positive interneurons (PVs) showed a significantly more random pattern spatial structure. 43 Notably, application of Peters’ Rule for synapse prediction by random overlap between axons 44 and dendrites enhanced structured connectivity in PCs, but, by contrast, made the connectivity 45 pattern in PVs more random. In addition, PCs in a deep sublayer of striatum pyramidale 46 appeared more highly structured than PCs in superficial layers, and little or no sublayer 47 specificity was found in PVs. Our results show that CA1 excitatory PCs and inhibitory PVs 48 innervated by the same SC inputs follow different connectivity rules. The different organizations 49 of fine scale structured connectivity in hippocampal excitatory and inhibitory neurons provide 50 important insights into the development and functions of neural networks. 51 2 52 Significance Statement 53 54 Understanding how neural circuits generate behavior is one of the central goals of neuroscience. 55 An important component of this endeavor is the mapping of fine-scale connection patterns that 56 underlie, and help us infer, signal processing in the brain. Here, using our recently developed 57 synapse detection technology (mGRASP and neuTube), we provide detailed profiles of synaptic 58 connectivity in excitatory (CA1 pyramidal) and inhibitory (CA1 parvalbumin-positive) neurons 59 innervated by the same presynaptic inputs (CA3 Schaffer collaterals). Our results reveal that 60 these two types of CA1 neurons follow different connectivity patterns. Our new evidence for 61 differently structured connectivity at a fine scale in hippocampal excitatory and inhibitory 62 neurons provides a better understanding of hippocampal networks and will guide theoretical and 63 experimental studies. 64 65 3 66 Introduction 67 68 Neuronal circuits exhibit multiple types of precise patterns of connectivity between 69 specialized groups of neurons (DeBello, 2014; Druckmann et al., 2014; Harris and Shepherd, 70 2015; Hofer et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2015; Kasthuri et al., 2015; Rieubland et al., 2014; Straub et 71 al., 2016). Synaptic connectivity is a central element in shaping neural dynamics and the 72 computational functions it supports. Therefore, it is imperative to map the organization of 73 synaptic connections and the principles underlying this organization. Indeed, much progress has 74 been made toward unveiling the organization of complex neural networks in increasing detail: 75 different cell types, afferent and efferent projections, synaptic connections and more have 76 recently been assessed with new technologies (Bloss et al., 2016; Cadwell et al., 2016; 77 Druckmann et al., 2014; Kasthuri et al., 2015; Oh et al., 2014; Wallace et al., 2017; Zingg et al., 78 2014). It is important to obtain quantitative descriptions of connectivity motifs and network 79 architectures, particularly those of excitatory and inhibitory neurons innervated by the same type 80 of cell. However, such descriptions remain elusive. 81 Recent studies of synaptic connectivity have focused on the spatial distribution of 82 afferent inputs (structured vs random) (Bloss et al., 2016; Druckmann et al., 2014; Kasthuri et 83 al., 2015; J. S. Kim et al., 2014) and have attempted to elucidate basic principles of connectivity, 84 for instance, with reference to Peters’ rule. Peters’ rule, a method proposed to predict synaptic 85 connectivity on the basis of geometric overlaps between axon and dendrite, has been interpreted 86 to provide support for random synaptic connectivity (Braitenberg and Schüz, 1998; Peters and 87 Feldman, 1976). This idea has been extrapolated to a general principle of brain organization and 88 has been used extensively in models of theoretical networks and theories about random 89 connectivity at the cellular and subcellular levels (Markram, 2006). However, when recent 90 studies have directly tested Peters’ rule with advanced technologies, conclusions have been 91 divided between confirming and refuting the concept; therefore, the debates continue (Rees et al., 92 2017). Previous studies, including our own, of postsynaptic dendrites and dendritic subdomains 93 of different neuron types show structured synaptic connectivity at the cellular and branch levels 94 in a way that is not consistent with Peters’ rule (Druckmann et al., 2014; Kasthuri et al., 2015; 95 Mishchenko et al., 2010; Rieubland et al., 2014). Additionally, recent studies with advanced 96 technologies demonstrate that traditionally defined cell types need to be refined by additional 4 97 criteria, such as topological location along principal axes, long-distance projection targets, and 98 comprehensive transcriptomes, and that these newly defined subpopulations exhibit structural 99 and functional differentiations, suggesting subtype-specific connectivity (Danielson et al., 2016; 100 Geiller et al., 2017; S.-H. Lee et al., 2014; Valero et al., 2015). Despite the need for a precise 101 description of subpopulation-specific connectivity, such information is not yet available at fine 102 spatial scales. 103 Here, we contribute to this description with a comprehensive, fine-scale mapping of the 104 spatial synaptic profiles of the main excitatory synaptic Schaffer collateral (SC) inputs onto 105 dorsal hippocampal CA1 inhibitory neurons – parvalbumin-positive interneurons (PVs) – as 106 major target interneurons of SC inputs. To achieve this goal, we used mammalian GFP 107 reconstitution across synaptic partners (mGRASP), as previously described (Druckmann et al., 108 2014; Feng et al., 2012; J. Kim et al., 2012). We found a broad range of spatial structure of 109 synaptic connections
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neuromodulators and Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Learning and Memory: a Steered-Glutamatergic Perspective
    brain sciences Review Neuromodulators and Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Learning and Memory: A Steered-Glutamatergic Perspective Amjad H. Bazzari * and H. Rheinallt Parri School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)1212044186 Received: 7 October 2019; Accepted: 29 October 2019; Published: 31 October 2019 Abstract: The molecular pathways underlying the induction and maintenance of long-term synaptic plasticity have been extensively investigated revealing various mechanisms by which neurons control their synaptic strength. The dynamic nature of neuronal connections combined with plasticity-mediated long-lasting structural and functional alterations provide valuable insights into neuronal encoding processes as molecular substrates of not only learning and memory but potentially other sensory, motor and behavioural functions that reflect previous experience. However, one key element receiving little attention in the study of synaptic plasticity is the role of neuromodulators, which are known to orchestrate neuronal activity on brain-wide, network and synaptic scales. We aim to review current evidence on the mechanisms by which certain modulators, namely dopamine, acetylcholine, noradrenaline and serotonin, control synaptic plasticity induction through corresponding metabotropic receptors in a pathway-specific manner. Lastly, we propose that neuromodulators control plasticity outcomes through steering glutamatergic transmission, thereby gating its induction and maintenance. Keywords: neuromodulators; synaptic plasticity; learning; memory; LTP; LTD; GPCR; astrocytes 1. Introduction A huge emphasis has been put into discovering the molecular pathways that govern synaptic plasticity induction since it was first discovered [1], which markedly improved our understanding of the functional aspects of plasticity while introducing a surprisingly tremendous complexity due to numerous mechanisms involved despite sharing common “glutamatergic” mediators [2].
    [Show full text]
  • On the Integration of Subthreshold Inputs from Perforant Path and Schaffer Collaterals in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons
    Journal of Computational Neuroscience 14, 185–192, 2003 c 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. On the Integration of Subthreshold Inputs from Perforant Path and Schaffer Collaterals in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons MICHELE MIGLIORE Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Institute of Biophysics, Nat. Res. Council, Palermo, Italy [email protected] Received October 15, 2001; Revised September 6, 2002; Accepted September 6, 2002 Action Editor: E. Bard Ermentrout Abstract. Using a realistic model of a CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neuron, we make experimentally testable predictions on the roles of the non-specific cation current, Ih, and the A-type Potassium current, IA, in modulating the temporal window for the integration of the two main excitatory afferent pathways of a CA1 neuron, the Schaffer Collaterals and the Perforant Path. The model shows that the experimentally observed increase in the dendritic density of Ih and IA could have a major role in constraining the temporal integration window for these inputs, in such a way that a somatic action potential (AP) is elicited only when they are activated with a relative latency consistent with the anatomical arrangement of the hippocampal circuitry. Keywords: dendritic integration, IA, Ih, CA1, modeling Introduction these two conductances between pyramidal neurons of hippocampus and neocortex. The gKA increases with Although important details on how dendrites and their distance from the soma in CA1, whereas in neocor- active properties are involved in neural computation tical neurons it is constant (Korngreen and Sakmann, have been elucidated, the rules according to which 2000; Bekkers, 2000), and it does not seem to play the dendritic trees and, especially, ionic conductances are same role as in CA1 (Stuart and H¨ausser, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Associative Learning and CA3–CA1 Synaptic Plasticity Are Impaired In
    12288 • The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2010 • 30(37):12288–12300 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Associative Learning and CA3–CA1 Synaptic Plasticity Are Ϫ/Ϫ Impaired in D1R Null, Drd1a Mice and in Hippocampal siRNA Silenced Drd1a Mice Oskar Ortiz,1,2 Jose´ María Delgado-García,3 Isabel Espadas,1,2 Amine Bahí,4 Ramo´n Trullas,2,5 Jean-Luc Dreyer,4 Agne`s Gruart,3* and Rosario Moratalla1,2* 1Instituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid 28002, Spain, 2Centro de Investigacio´n Biome´dica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid 28002, Spain, 3Divisio´n de Neurociencias, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla 41013, Spain, 4University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland, and 5Instituto de Invest Biome´dicas de Barcelona, CSIC, Barcelona 08036, Spain Associative learning depends on multiple cortical and subcortical structures, including striatum, hippocampus, and amygdala. Both glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems have been implicated in learning and memory consolidation. While the role of glutamate is well established, the role of dopamine and its receptors in these processes is less clear. In this study, we used two models Ϫ/Ϫ of dopamine D1 receptor (D1R, Drd1a) loss, D1R knock-out mice (Drd1a ) and mice with intrahippocampal injections of Drd1a-siRNA (small interfering RNA), to study the role of D1R in different models of learning, hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and associ- ated gene expression. D1R loss markedly reduced spatial learning, fear learning, and classical conditioning of the eyelid response, as well as the associated activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1–CA3 synapse.
    [Show full text]
  • Synaptopac, an Optogenetic Tool for Induction of Presynaptic Plasticity
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.27.011635; this version posted March 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. SynaptoPAC, an Optogenetic Tool for Induction of Presynaptic Plasticity Silvia Oldani1,2, Laura Moreno-Velasquez2, Alexander Stumpf2, Christian Rosenmund2, Dietmar Schmitz1-5,*, Benjamin R. Rost1,* 1 German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 10117 Berlin, Germany 2 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany 3 Max-Delbruck-Centrum (MDC) for molecular medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany. 4 Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, 10115 Berlin, Germany. 5 Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany. * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: Optogenetic manipulations have transformed neuroscience in recent years. While sophisticated tools now exist for controlling the firing patterns of neurons, it remains challenging to optogenetically define the plasticity state of individual synapses. A variety of synapses in the mammalian brain express presynaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) upon elevation of presynaptic cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), but the molecular expression mechanisms as well as the impact of presynaptic LTP on network activity and behavior are not fully understood. In order to establish optogenetic control of presynaptic cAMP levels and thereby presynaptic potentiation, we developed synaptoPAC, a presynaptically targeted version of the photoactivated adenylyl cyclase bPAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Modulation of Long-Term Potentiation Through a Presynaptic Mechanism Involving Trkb
    The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2000, 20(18):6888–6897 The Role of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Receptors in the Mature Hippocampus: Modulation of Long-Term Potentiation through a Presynaptic Mechanism involving TrkB Baoji Xu,1 Wolfram Gottschalk,3 Ana Chow,3 Rachel I. Wilson,2 Eric Schnell,2 Keling Zang,1 Denan Wang,1 Roger A. Nicoll,2 Bai Lu,3 and Louis F. Reichardt1 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Program in Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, and 2Program in Neuroscience and Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, and 3Unit on Synapse Development and Plasticity, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 The neurotrophin BDNF has been shown to modulate long-term fects presynaptic function and reduces the ability of tetanic potentiation (LTP) at Schaffer collateral-CA1 hippocampal syn- stimulation to induce LTP. Postsynaptic glutamate receptors are apses. Mutants in the BDNF receptor gene trkB and antibodies to not affected by TrkB reduction, indicating that BDNF does not its second receptor p75NTR have been used to determine the modulate plasticity through postsynaptic TrkB. Consistent with receptors and cells involved in this response. Inhibition of this, elimination of TrkB in postsynaptic neurons does not affect p75NTR does not detectably reduce LTP or affect presynaptic LTP. Moreover, normal LTP is generated in the mutant with re- function, but analyses of newly generated trkB mutants implicate duced TrkB by a depolarization–low-frequency stimulation pair- TrkB. One mutant has reduced expression in a normal pattern of ing protocol that puts minimal demands on presynaptic terminal TrkB throughout the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Globus Pallidus Neurochemical Responses to the Partial Nmda Agonist Glyx-13 Among Hd51 Huntington's Disease Model Rats
    GLOBUS PALLIDUS NEUROCHEMICAL RESPONSES TO THE PARTIAL NMDA AGONIST GLYX-13 AMONG HD51CAG HUNTINGTON’S DISEASE MODEL RATS Antigone Wolfram-Aduan2, Aaron Antcliff2, Zach Semaan2, Jennifer Knirk2, John Wickwire2, Abby Knoll2, Becky Koepke2, Justin Gilardone2, Amanda Hartman2, Michael Mandziara2, Haley Tomlinson2, Dana Delaney2, Megan Altemus2 Andrew Crane2, Jessica Matyas3, Steven Lowrance, M.S.2, Naveen Jayaprakash, M.S.2, Joseph Moskal, Ph.D.6, Julien Rossignol, Ph.D.2,4,5, Gary Dunbar, Ph.D.1,2,3,5, and Michael Sandström, Ph.D.1,2,3 SandstromSandstrom Central Michigan University Dept. of Psychology1, Neuroscience2, Experimental Psychology3 Programs, and College of Medicine4, Mount Pleasant MI 48859 USA CentralCentral MichiganMichigan UniversityUniversity 5Field Neurosciences Institute, Saginaw MI 48604 USA LabLab NeuroscienceNeuroscience ProgramProgram 6Falk Center for Molecular Therapeutics, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston IL 60201 USA HPLC RESULTS INTRODUCTION D. Median Baseline Huntington’s disease (HD) is a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder characterized by A. Glutamate B. Glutamine D. cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions (motor impairments) and striatal neurodegeneration 175 GLYX-13 150 GLYX-13 2500 7 in later stages. HD is caused by an expansion of repeated CAG codons for glutamine on Wild Type Content Dialysate 150 125 6 the huntingtin gene, expanding the Huntingtin protein. It is hypothesized that abnormal Homozygote 2000 glutamate transmission may underlie the neuropathological changes seen in HD. In excess, 125 100 5 (ng) GABA glutamate can produce excitotoxicity in the brain, leading to neuronal cell death, and a 100 Wild Type 9 mo 75 1500 4 defect in glutamate reuptake by astrocytes may contribute to the phenotype exhibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippocampal Neurophysiology Is Modified by a Disease-Associated C-Terminal Fragment of Tau Protein
    Hippocampal neurophysiology is modified by a disease-associated C-terminal fragment of tau protein Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Open Access Tamagnini, F., Walsh, D., Brown, J. T., Bondulich, M. K., Hanger, D. P. and Randall, A. D. (2017) Hippocampal neurophysiology is modified by a disease-associated C- terminal fragment of tau protein. Neurobiology of Aging, 60. pp. 44-56. ISSN 0197-4580 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.07.005 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/80435/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.07.005 Publisher: Elsevier All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Neurobiology of Aging 60 (2017) 44e56 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neurobiology of Aging journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/neuaging Hippocampal neurophysiology is modified by a disease-associated C-terminal fragment of tau protein Francesco Tamagnini a,*, Darren A. Walsh a, Jon T. Brown a, Marie K. Bondulich b, Diane P. Hanger b, Andrew D. Randall a a Institute of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK b King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK article info abstract Article history: The accumulation of cleaved tau fragments in the brain is associated with several tauopathies.
    [Show full text]
  • Laminar Selectivity of the Cholinergic Suppression of Synaptic Transmission in Rat Hippocampal Region CA 1: Computational Modeling and Brain Slice Physiology
    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1994, 14(6): 38983914 Laminar Selectivity of the Cholinergic Suppression of Synaptic Transmission in Rat Hippocampal Region CA 1: Computational Modeling and Brain Slice Physiology Michael E. Hasselmo and Eric Schnell Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 ACh may set the dynamics of cortical function to those ap- ACh suppressesexcitatory synaptic transmissionin many regions propriate for learning new information. In models of the pu- of the cortex, including the piriform cortex (Williams and Con- tative associative memory function of piriform cortex, se- stanti, 1988; Hasselmo and Bower, 1992) the dentate gyrus lective suppression of intrinsic but not afferent fiber synaptic (Yamamoto and Kawai, 1967; Kahle and Cotman, 1989; Bur- transmission by ACh prevents recall of previous input from gard and Sarvey, 1990) region CA1 of the hippocampus interfering with the learning of new input (Hasselmo, 1993). (Hounsgaard, 1978; Valentino and Dingledine, 1981; Dutar and Selective cholinergic suppression may play a similar role in Nicoll, 1988; Blitzer et al., 1990; Sheridan and Sutor, 1990) the hippocampal formation, where Schaffer collateral syn- and neocortical structures (Brother et al., 1992). The memory apses in stratum radiatum (s. rad) may store associations impairment causedby muscarinic antagonistsor lesionsof cor- between activity in region CA3 and the entorhinal cortex tical cholinergic innervation (Beatty and Carbone, 1980; Walker input to region CA1 terminating in stratum lacunosum-mo- and Olton, 1984; Spenceret al., 1985; Kopelman, 1986; Hagan leculare (s. l-m). A computational model of region CA1 pre- and Morris, 1989) may be due to blockade of this cholinergic dicts that for effective associative memory function of the suppression.
    [Show full text]
  • 120 Years of Hippocampal Schaffer Collaterals
    HIPPOCAMPUS 22:1508–1516 (2012) COMMENTARY 120 years of Hippocampal Schaffer Collaterals Imre Szirmai,1* Gyo¨rgy Buzsa´ki,2 and Anita Kamondi3 ABSTRACT: Ka´roly Schaffer (1864–1939) was a Hungarian neurolo- Schaffer’s scientific career coincided with the era of gist who distinguished himself through original discoveries in human feverish discussions on the nature of neuronal commu- neuropathology. At the beginning of his scientific carrier, he described ´ the cellular and fiber structure of the hippocampus, earning him a high nication, initiated by Santiago Ramon y Cajal. The reputation in neuroscience. Schaffer (1892) described the so-called ‘‘reticularis camp,’’ lead by Camillo Golgi (1843– ‘‘collateral fiber system’’ that connects the CA3 and CA1 regions of the 1926), promoted the idea that the cytoplasm of one hippocampus, known today as Schaffer collaterals. To decipher the his- nerve cell was continuous with the cytoplasm of other tory of this well-known eponym, we review Schaffer’s original German nerve cells. However, Ramo´n y Cajal could not find publication and follow the impact of his research in the contemporary evidence for the continuity among neurons, and literature. VC 2012 Wiley Periodicals Inc. instead, he argued that nerve cells were independent KEY WORDS: CA3; CA1; connectivity; cell types; interneurons elements establishing connections by contiguity, i.e., only touching each other (Finger, 1994). The neuron doctrine debate was fully blooming after von Wal- deyer-Hartz’s (1856–1921) imposing review on the INTRODUCTION subject in 1891. After this publication, the continuous reticular network hypothesis of Golgi no longer Ka´roly Schaffer (Fig. 1), son of a sculptor, completed his medical appeared tenable, although the Hungarian Istva´n studies in Budapest in 1888 (Baran et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Plasticity at the Schaffer Collateral: a New Model with Implications for Hippocampal Processing
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 1-1-2012 Short-Term Plasticity at the Schaffer Collateral: A New Model with Implications for Hippocampal Processing Andrew Hamilton Toland Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Musculoskeletal, Neural, and Ocular Physiology Commons, Neurology Commons, and the Other Mathematics Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Toland, Andrew Hamilton, "Short-Term Plasticity at the Schaffer Collateral: A New Model with Implications for Hippocampal Processing" (2012). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 756. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.756 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Short-Term Plasticity at the Schaffer Collateral: A New Model with Implications for Hippocampal Processing by Andrew Hamilton Toland A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Systems Science Dissertation Committee: George G. Lendaris, Chair Patrick Roberts Mathew Frerking Dacian Daescu Gerardo Lafferriere Portland State University ©2012 i Abstract A new mathematical model of short-term synaptic plasticity (STP) at the Schaffer collateral is introduced. Like other models of STP, the new model relates short-term synaptic plasticity to an interaction between facilitative and depressive dynamic influ- ences. Unlike previous models, the new model successfully simulates facilitative and depressive dynamics within the framework of the synaptic vesicle cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedforward Excitation of the Hippocampus by Afferents from the Entorhinal Cortex: Redefinition of the Role of the Trisynaptic Pathway MARK F
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 87, pp. 5832-5836, August 1990 Neurobiology Feedforward excitation of the hippocampus by afferents from the entorhinal cortex: Redefinition of the role of the trisynaptic pathway MARK F. YECKEL* AND THEODORE W. BERGER*tt Departments of *Behavioral Neuroscience and tPsychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA Communicated by Richard F. Thompson, April 9, 1990 (received for review September 26, 1989) ABSTRACT For the past 3 decades, functional character- hippocampal cell groups (see Fig. 1). Although evidence for izations of the hippocampus have emphasized its intrinsic the functional viability of monosynaptic entorhinal input to trisynaptic circuitry, which consists of successive excitatory pyramidal neurons has been provided (9-11), the relative projections from the entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus, strengths ofthe monosynaptic and trisynaptic pathways have from granule cells of the dentate to the CA3/4 pyramidal cell gone untested. At least one investigation has questioned the region, and from CA3/4 to the CA1/2 pyramidal cell region. sufficiency ofmonosynaptic entorhinal input for suprathresh- Despite unequivocal anatomical evidence for a monosynaptic old activation of pyramidal neurons (5). Other studies using projection from entorhinal to CA3 and CA1/2, few in vivo the in vitro hippocampal slice have examined pyramidal cell electrophysiological studies of the direct pathway have been responses to electrical stimulation of monosynaptic afferents reported. In the experiments presented here, we stimulated within the dendritic region containing terminals of entorhinal axons of entorhinal cortical neurons in vivo and recorded axons (12). The entorhinal pathway cannot be activated evoked single unit and population spike responses in the selectively in an in vitro preparation, however, because dentate, CA3, and CAl of hippocampus, to determine if afferents from other brain regions terminate within the same pyramidal cells are driven primarily via the monosynaptic or dendritic zone (13-15).
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Synaptic Transmission in CA1 Hippocampus After Eyeblink Conditioning
    RAPID COMMUNICATION Enhanced Synaptic Transmission in CA1 Hippocampus After Eyeblink Conditioning JOHN M. POWER, LUCIEN T. THOMPSON, JAMES R. MOYER, JR., AND JOHN F. DISTERHOFT Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Power, John M., Lucien T. Thompson, James R. Moyer, Jr., stimulation evoked larger summating excitatory postsynaptic and John F. Disterhoft. Enhanced synaptic transmission in CA1 potentials (EPSPs) in CA1 pyramidal neurons from condi- hippocampus after eyeblink conditioning. J. Neurophysiol. 78: tioned rabbits (LoTurco et al. 1988). [ 3H] a-amino-3-hy- 1184±1187, 1997. CA1 ®eld potentials evoked by Schaffer collat- droxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) binding Downloaded from eral stimulation of hippocampal slices from trace-conditioned rab- in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus sub®elds is increased after bits were compared with those from naive and pseudoconditioned controls. Conditioned rabbits received 80 trace conditioning trials conditioning (Tocco et al. 1992). In the present study, daily until reaching a criterion of 80% conditioned responses in a Schaffer collateral evoked synaptic responses in slices from session. Hippocampal slices were prepared 1 or 24 h after reaching trace-conditioned rabbits are compared with those in naive criterion (for trace-conditioned animals) or after a ®nal unpaired and pseudoconditioned controls at intervals where maximal stimulus session (for pseudoconditioned animals); naive animals postsynaptic changes have been
    [Show full text]