DOCSLIB.ORG

Calculating the Number of Enslaved Africans Transported by the Royal African Company During Edward Colston’S Involvement (1680-92)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calculating the Number of Enslaved Africans Transported by the Royal African Company During Edward Colston’S Involvement (1680-92) Calculating the number of enslaved Africans transported by the Royal African Company during Edward Colston’s involvement (1680-92) By Roger Ball 10th June, 2020 Introduction Edward Colston was an investor, official and eventually deputy governor of the Royal African Company (RAC) from 1680-92.[1] Over this period the RAC purchased and transported tens of thousands of enslaved Africans across the Atlantic into a life of hard labour. This article aims to answer number of questions about the RAC’s involvement in the slave trade in particular during Edward Colston’s tenure. These questions are: • How many enslaved Africans were purchased by the RAC between 1680 and 1692? • How many survived the journey across the Atlantic? • What was the mortality rate? • Where did the captives come from? • Where were these Africans being transported to? • What was the breakdown by age and gender of the captives? • What was the approximate value of these captives to the RAC? Two sets of figures are employed here to estimate the number of Africans transported across the Atlantic from 1680-1692 by the RAC. Estimates based on data at destination The first set of figures comes from Carlos and Kruse[2] whose 1996 paper uses statistics originally published by Davies in his seminal work The Royal African Company originally published in 1957.[3] Carlos and Kruse give a table[4] of slave population and the numbers of enslaved Africans imported by the RAC into Barbados, Jamaica and the Leeward Islands[5] for the period 1673-1712. This data is reproduced in Table 1 with the 1680-92 period highlighted. Table 1: Carlos and Kruse; Slave population estimates and RAC slave imports by region 1673-1712. Based on this data Table 2 states the total number of enslaved Africans disembarked in Barbados, Jamaica and the Leeward Islands for the period 1680-92 as 42,718. Carlos and Kruse note that in another study Eltis had argued that the Davies figures underestimate the number of slaves delivered by the Royal African Company, by perhaps 30%[6] According to Eltis this was because: Not all auction sales seem to have been included in the invoice books on which Davies relied. Near the end of the Company’s busiest decade the RAC calculated its own sales from auctions at 46,396 slaves, 6,000 (15 percent) greater than Davies’s figure. Moreover, Davies made no systematic use of Naval Office or more generally Colonial Office documents in his study. He thus bypassed sources that would have provided information on the ‘contract’ arrivals of slaves that were not put up for auction These arrivals were more numerous than he assumed. It is not always possible to identify RAC ships once one moves away from the T70 series but count of only those slaves carried in clearly identifiable RAC ships yields minimum estimate from the data set of 125,000 slaves from 1672 to 1711, the years of Davies series. The actual figure is probably higher by several thousand. The Davies count of RAC arrivals alone thus needs to be increased by at least 30 percent[7] This adjustment to Davies’s figures has been made in Table 2, giving a revised figure of 55,533 enslaved Africans delivered from 1680-92. Eltis also calculated the average mortality rate for the transatlantic crossing at 20% for the period 1662-1713.[8] Employing this factor gives in Table 2 an estimate of enslaved Africans embarked (69,417) and the numbers who died on route (13,883). Table 2: Estimate of numbers of enslaved Africans embarked and disembarked in Barbados, Jamaica and Leeward Islands by RAC from 1680-1692. These estimates are conservative for several reasons. First, they only cover deliveries of enslaved Africans by the RAC to particular Caribbean islands. It would be expected that some RAC trade would have occurred with other parts of the Caribbean, mainland American colonies and perhaps eastwards through collaboration with the East India Company.[9] These deliveries have not have been recorded in this data. Second, there was some corruption internal to the RAC whereby ship’s captains chartered by the RAC smuggled and clandestinely sold slaves for their own profit. Although, Carlos and Kruse note this practice they recognise that calculating figures for it is problematic.[10] Finally, the 30% correction to Davies’s figures applied by Eltis is conservative.[11] Estimates based on slave ship voyage data The second set of figures for RAC shipments of enslaved Africans across the Atlantic are derived from the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database, an online resource which logs individual slave ship voyages across the Atlantic from 1514-1866.[12]A search of this database for RAC owned ships over the period 1680-92 yielded 279 voyages with the majority of disembarkations (87.5%) in the Caribbean destinations quoted by Davies (Barbados, Jamaica and the Leeward Islands) as shown in Table 3. Table 3: Destination of RAC trans-Atlantic voyages carrying enslaved Africans from 1680-92. A summary of the number of slaves embarked and disembarked by year for the period 1680-92 is given in Table 4. The overall embarkation and disembarkation figures of 84,498 and 65,157 respectively allow the deaths of enslaved Africans on the trans-Atlantic crossing to be calculated as 19,341. This gives an average mortality rate per voyage of approximately 23%, suggesting that between 1-in-4 and 1-in-5 of enslaved Africans died on route. Table 4: Numbers of enslaved Africans embarked and disembarked on RAC trans-Atlantic voyages for the period 1680-92. Comparison of data sources Initial comparison of the figures based on slave ship voyages with the previous estimates shows that they are considerably larger. However, two factors derived from the later analysis need to be applied to the original data in order to make an accurate comparison: • As noted previously in this article Davies’s figures (reproduced by Carlos and Kruse) only cover RAC deliveries to Barbados, Jamaica and the Leeward Islands. Table 3 shows that only 87% of the voyages in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database went to these three destinations. A factor (1.07) taking into account the extra and unknown destinations can thus be applied to Davies’s original figures to take account of the difference in source data.[13] • Davies’s figures (quoted by Carlos and Kruse) shown in Table 1 for Jamaica and the Leeward Islands do not cover the period 1690-92. However, an examination of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database shows that there were seven voyages to Jamaica in this period, though none to the Leeward Islands. The data for the Jamaican voyages is given in Table 5. The extra 2716 enslaved Africans transported to Jamaica should be added to Davies’s baseline data in Table 2. Table 5: RAC slave ship voyages to Jamaica 1690-2 from Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database. • Eltis’s assumed mortality rate of 20% in Table 2 has been shown to be an underestimate for RAC slave ship voyages in the period 1680-92. The latter figure of 23% should be applied to the calculation. These revised factors are applied to the data in Table 2 and the results are shown in Table 6. Table 6: Estimate of numbers of enslaved Africans embarked and disembarked in Barbados, Jamaica and Leeward Islands by RAC from 1680-1692 corrected for extra destinations and increased mortality rate. With the two new correction factors a comparison can be made between the two sets of data, as shown in Table 7. Table 7: Comparison of figures for enslaved Africans transported across the Atlantic from 1680- 1692 derived from data at destination (Davies) and slave ship voyage data. As the less accurate figures based upon data at the destination of the voyages are approaching that for the slave ship voyages and lie within 3%, the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database is considered to be the most accurate information and will used as the primary data source for further investigation. Additional data on enslaved Africans transported by the RAC from 1680-92 The Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database provides several categories of data concerning the enslaved Africans transported by the RAC which can be extracted for the period 1680-92. Table 8 gives the location of the purchase of the enslaved Africans and these are mapped in Figure 1 along with the principal destinations of the RAC voyages. Table 8: Principal region of purchase of enslaved Africans by the RAC for the period 1680-92. Figure 1: Principal regions of purchase of enslaved Africans by RAC (1680-92) and main destinations in the Caribbean. Table 9 gives a breakdown by age and gender of the captives based on significant samples of the 279 voyages undertaken by the RAC between 1680 and 1692. The percentage fractions are derived from a weighted average of the data from each voyage in the sample. This allows a rough estimate of the numbers of enslaved Africans embarked on RAC ships in each category. Boys and girls are loosely defined as being of ten years of age or younger.[14] Table 9: Breakdown by gender and age of embarked enslaved Africans on RAC voyages 1680-92. From the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database it is possible to calculate the approximate monetary value of the surviving captives at sale in the Caribbean. This is achieved by averaging the price, based upon temporally dependent archival data for Jamaica over the period 1680-92. This yielded an average price for a ‘prime male’ of £18.73.[15] Using price factors derived from historic data for women (0.8) and children (0.5),[16] an adjusted[17] percentage breakdown by age and gender of cargoes given in Table 9 and the number of disembarked slaves from Table 7 (65,157) it was possible to estimate the total trading value (in pounds sterling) of enslaved Africans moved by the RAC over the twelve year period (1680-92).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Colston, Edward (1636–1721) Kenneth Morgan
    Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Colston, Edward (1636–1721) Kenneth Morgan • Published in print: 23 September 2004 • Published online: 23 September 2004 • This version: 9th July 2020 Colston, Edward (1636–1721), merchant, slave trader, and philanthropist, was born on 2 November 1636 in Temple Street, Bristol, the eldest of probably eleven children (six boys and five girls are known) of William Colston (1608–1681), a merchant, and his wife, Sarah, née Batten (d. 1701). His father had served an apprenticeship with Richard Aldworth, one of the wealthiest Bristol merchants of the early Stuart period, and had prospered as a merchant. A royalist and an alderman, William Colston was removed from his office by order of parliament in 1645 after Prince Rupert surrendered the city to the roundhead forces. Until that point Edward Colston had been brought up in Bristol and probably at Winterbourne, south Gloucestershire, where his father had an estate. The Colston family moved to London during the English civil war. Little is known about Edward Colston's education, though it is possible that he was a private pupil at Christ's Hospital. In 1654 he was apprenticed to the London Mercers' Company for eight years. By 1672 he was shipping goods from London, and the following year he was enrolled in the Mercers' Company. He soon built up a lucrative mercantile business, trading with Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Africa. From the 1670s several of Colston’s immediate family members became involved in the Royal African Company, and Edward became a member himself on 26 March 1680. The Royal African Company was a chartered joint-stock Company based in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Memory of Atlantic Slavery in European Towns with an Excursus on the Caribbean Ulrike Schmieder1
    Cuadernos Inter.c.a.mbio sobre Centroamérica y el Caribe Vol. 15, No. 1, abril-setiembre, 2018, ISSN: 1659-0139 Sites of Memory of Atlantic Slavery in European Towns with an Excursus on the Caribbean Ulrike Schmieder1 Abstract Recepción: 7 de agosto de 2017/ Aceptación: 4 de diciembre de 2017 For a long time, the impact of Atlantic slavery on European societies was discussed in academic circles, but it was no part of national, regional and local histories. In the last three decades this has changed, at different rhythms in the former metropolises. The 150th anniversary of the abolition of slavery in France (1998) and the 200th anniversary of the prohibition of the slave trade in Great Britain (2007) opened the debates to the broader public. Museums and memorials were established, but they coexist with monu- ments to slave traders as benefactors of their town. In Spain and Portugal the process to include the remembrance of slavery in local and national history is developing more slowly, as the impact of slave trade on Spanish and Portuguese urbanization and in- dustrialization is little known, and the legacies of recent fascist dictatorships are not yet overcome. This article focuses on sites of commemoration and silent traces of slavery. Keywords Memory; slave trade; slavery; European port towns; Caribbean Resumen Durante mucho tiempo, la influencia de la esclavitud atlántica sobre sociedades euro- peas fue debatida en círculos académicos, pero no fue parte de historias nacionales, regionales y locales. En las últimas tres décadas esto ha cambiado a diferentes ritmos en las antiguas metrópolis. El 150 aniversario de la abolición de la esclavitud en Francia (1998) y el bicentenario de la prohibición del tráfico de esclavizados en Gran Bretaña (2007) abrieron los debates a un público más amplio.
    [Show full text]
  • SLAVERY & Abolition
    Bristol Insight : Open Top Bus and Walking Tours We take your group on a fully guided open top bus journey – or walking tour – taking in the important sites in Bristol linked to transatlantic slavery and its abolition. Our Tour Guides offer an informative and interactive tour introducing the controversial and often contradictory parts of Bristol’s history. This includes the city’s links to the transatlantic slave trade and the significant men and women who were involved. This can be a fully independent tour or can be linked with pick-ups/drop-offs at other locations in this leaflet. Suitable for: Key Stage 2 and above . For more details phone: 0117 971 9279 TRANSATLANTIC Email: [email protected] Website: www.bristolinsight.co.uk (and click the link for ‘Private Hire’ on the right hand side) SLAVERY & St Mary Redcliffe: Workshop and Tour Explore Bristol’s maritime history in an interactive workshop and meet the city’s explorers and merchants. AboLITIoN In this workshop we introduce the wealthy 15th century shipowner and Lord Mayor of Bristol William Canynges MP and explorer John Cabot who sailed to North America in 1497 in The Matthew. IN bRISToL We also consider the controversial merchant Edward Colston, who was both Deputy Governor of the Royal African Company, which traded in enslaved men, women and children but was also a generous benefactor within Bristol. Suitable for: Key Stage 2 and above . Tours, trips, workshops, For more details phone: 0117 231 0060 Email: sarah.yates@stmaryredcliffe.co.uk talks and exhibitions ©Emily Whitfield-Wicks Website: www.stmaryredcliffe.co.uk/education.html for schools and colleges Charity number 1134120 Each of the learning opportunities in this leaflet can be booked separately, but can also be combined for a longer visit and more enriching learning experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Colston Revisited: Debating His Place in History and What His Legacy Means for Us Today
    Colston revisited: debating his place in history and what his legacy means for us today. ▪ Stage One: Research, discussion & debate. ▪ Stage Two: Monday 21st September Period 3: Online Talk from Dr Madge Dresser. ▪ Stage Three: Should the school be renamed? Colston revisited: debating his place in history and what his legacy means for us today. • Dr Madge Dresser is Honorary Professor of History at the University of Bristol. • She has researched and written extensively on issues related to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and Bristol’s involvement with it. • Dr Dresser is very keen to help students at Colston’s School to debate and discuss issues associated with the slave trade and Edward Colston. She hopes to pose questions as much as answer them, but also to provide a structure for discussion and thinking on how History should be commemorated. She hopes to help you come to your own judgement on whether Colston’s School should continue to bear his name. Stage 1: Preparation Watch this 4 min. talk (start from 9.30 mins) by Dr Dresser from Dec. 2017. Take notes on Dr Dresser’s arguments ready for discussion. Listen to this 7 min. interview with Chris Patten, Chancellor of Oxford University, in Jan 2016 about the Cecil Rhodes statue at Oriel College. Take notes on the arguments ready for discussion. 1. Use your notes to write a short paragraph summing up the key points from the two clips. 2. Research definitions to these terms used in the talks: a) Silo-thinking. Task One b) Cancel Culture. Should we have a c) Civic belonging.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Historians of Bristol: William Barrett and Samuel Seyer
    THE FIRST HIS OF BRISTOL: WILLIAM BARRET'!·····., .... ,.··--·-·-- AND SAMUEL SEYER THE BRISTOL BRANCH OF THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL HISTORY PAMPHLETS -THE FIRST HISTORIANS OF BRISTOL: Hon. General Editor: PETER HARRIS NORMA KNIGHT WILLIAM BARRETT Assistant General Editor: AND SAMUEL SEYER Editorial Advisor: JOSEPH BETTEY From the early Middle Ages successive chroniclers and antiquarians have The First Historians of Bristol: William Barrett and Samuel Seyer is the one calendared events and described incidents in the history of Bristol, but hundred and eighth pamphlet in this series.. not until the eighteenth century was there any attempt to write a Dr Joseph Bettey was Reader in Local History at the University of complete and accurate account of the history of the city, based on the Bristol and is the author of numerous books and articles on west-country documentary evidence. Writing in 1125, the monk, William of history. He has written several pamphlets in this series, most recently Malmesbury, described the commerce and shipping of the port of Bristol, St Augustine's Abbey, Bristol and The Royal Fort and Tyndall's Park: the and the struggle of St Wulstan to suppress the trade in slaves to Ireland. development of a Bristol landscape (nos. 88 and 92). Robert of Lewes, bishop of Bath from 1136 to 1166, chronicled the The publication of a pamphlet by the Bristol Branch of the Historical misdeeds of Bristolians in the army assembled at Bristol by Robert, Earl Association does not necessarily imply the Branch's approval of the of Gloucester, during the Civil War between the forces of Stephen and opinions expressed in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Edward Colston and Why Was His Statue Pulled Down?’ by Dave Barnes
    THE BAME EXPERIENCE Oasis Academy South Bank A Special Teacher Edition If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. 26th June 2020 – Desmond Tutu Issue 3 ‘Who was Edward Colston and why was his statue pulled down?’ By Dave Barnes How does this link to the Black Lives Matter movement? How does it link into Britain’s imperial history? On Monday the 8th of June 2020, the news across Britain was filled with images of a toppled statue in Bristol. The statue was of man called Edward Colston and protestors had pulled him from his plinth (the base upon which a statue stands), rolled him down the street and tipped him into the harbour. So, who was Edward Colston and why did protestors pull down his statue? Edward Colston lived from 1636- 1721 and was a slave trader. Colston was a board member and deputy governor of the Royal African Company. This was a company set up to take part in the Triangular Trade (that you learned about in year 7). In those roles, he helped to oversee the transportation into slavery of an estimated 84,000 Africans. Of them, it is be- lieved, around 19,000 died on slave ships during the infamous Middle Passage from the coast of Africa to plan- tations in the Americas. Those who survived the Middle Passage were forced to work on plantations growing sugar, cotton and tobacco for the rest of their lives in terrible conditions. Colston became very wealthy from trading human beings and gave some of his money to the city of Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memory of Slave Traders Fathi Habashi
    Laval University From the SelectedWorks of Fathi Habashi June 11, 2020 In Memory of Slave Traders Fathi Habashi Available at: https://works.bepress.com/fathi_habashi/641/ In Memory of Slave Traders Introduction The protests all over the world when George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police in USA aroused the memory of slave traders1. London's mayor announced that more statues of imperialist figures could be removed from Britain's streets after protesters knocked down the monument to a slave trader in Bristol. By the 18th century, the slave trade became a major economic mainstay for such cities as Bristol, Liverpool and Glasgow, engaged in the so-called "Triangular trade". The ships set out from Britain, loaded with trade goods which were exchanged on the West African shores for slaves captured by local rulers from deeper inland; the slaves were transported across the Atlantic, and were sold at considerable profit for labour in plantations. The ships were loaded with export crops and commodities, the products of slave labour, such as sugar and rum, and returned to Britain to sell the items. The triangle of slave trade African slaves European trading centers in West African coast 1 See https://works.bepress.com/fathi_habashi/638/ Transporting the slaves Great Britain the major role in slavery. Other countries involved, beside Great Britain, were the Dutch, Portugal, France, and Denmark who built forts in Africa. Tribe leaders cooperated in this venture. Moslem traders were concentrated in Zanzibar and they traded in the east. Forts built in West Africa for handling of the slave trade British Slave Traders Colston Edward Colston (1636 –1721) was an English merchant and a Member of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment Colston Statue Design and Heritage Statement Redacted.Pdf.Pdf
    Colston Statue October 2018 2 Heritage and design statement City Design Group Contents 1 Introduction Page no 4 Summary Planning policy context 2 Historic significance Page no 6 Edward Colston The statue Recent vandalism/artist interventions 3 The proposal Page no 10 Design process Statement of community involvement Design specification Assessment of harm October 2018 Colston Statue City Design Group Heritage and design statement 3 1 Introduction Summary Planning policy context In recent years Edward Colston has become a The statue of Edward Colston is a grade II listed recognised figurehead of the role Bristol merchants heritage asset. Consequently any works that have played in the enslavement and transportation of an impact on the special interest of the asset will Africans from the late 17th to 19th century. As require listed building consent in accordance with such the statue of Colston erected in 1895 has the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation become a target for the understandable public Areas) Act 1990. reaction to this distasteful past. The statue has Other relevant planning policies and guidance been the subject of several ‘art’ attacks such as his include: face being painted white, hand cuffs and a woollen ͹ National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), ball and chain being added. One recent ‘attack’ Section 12 involved an ‘unauthorised’ plaque being added to ͹ Bristol Local Plan, policies BCS21 and DM31 the statues stone plinth. Although the sentiments of the plaque are understandable the content was In accordance with paragraph 128 of the NPPF factually inaccurate and the resin glue used to this document aims to provide a statement of apply the plaque has discoloured and damaged the significance for the asset and set the background stonework.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Edward Colston and the Rise of Inclusive Place-Based Leadership by Professor Richard Bolden
    The Fall of Edward Colston and the Rise of Inclusive Place-Based Leadership By Professor Richard Bolden Posted on the Bristol Leadership and Change Centre blog, 15/06/2020 https://blogs.uwe.ac.uk/leadership-and-change/the-fall-of-edward-colston-and-the-rise-of-inclusive-place- based-leadership/ The killing of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis, USA on 25th May 2020 triggered a wave of protests about racial inequality that have spread around the world. In my home city of Bristol, UK the Black Lives Matter march on 7th June led to the toppling of the statue of Edward Colston, a 17th-century slave trader whose sculpture had stood in pride of place in the city centre for 125 years. The ironic fact that the bronze cast was then dragged to the quayside and unceremoniously dumped into the water at almost precisely the same place as his ships had docked over three hundred years ago did not go unnoticed1. Colston, who was born in Bristol in 1636 and lived there for much of his life, made his fortune as a merchant - initially trading wine, fruits and cloth before becoming involved in the slave trade. From 1680-1692 he worked for the Royal Africa Company, which held a monopoly for trading along Africa’s west coast, serving as deputy governor from 1689 to 1690. During his time at the company around 84,000 Africans were transported into slavery, with an estimated 19,000 perishing in the process2. Despite his involvement in this abhorrent trade, Colston was widely celebrated for endowing significant sums of money to local schools, hospitals, alms- houses and churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery: Memory and Afterlives
    Slavery: memory and afterlives Edited by Josie Gill and Julia O’Connell Davidson This collection was published in 2016 under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 licence. Produced by Cameron Thibos Cover photo: Zanzibar: Memory of Slaves. missy/Flickr. CC. PRINTING This publication is formatted for A5 paper and is thus optimised for printing as well as electronic viewing. If you have access to a duplex (front and back) printer, you can easily create a physical copy of this book by using the ‘booklet’ printing option available in Adobe Acrobat Reader and many other PDF viewing programmes. Slavery: memory and afterlives Edited by Josie Gill and Julia O’Connell Davidson Acknowledgements Beyond Trafficking and Slavery is grateful to the Brigstow Institute of the University of Bristol for its support in producing this volume as well as the online series of the same name. Julia O’Connell Davidson also gratefully acknowledges the Leverhulme Trust for the award of a Major Research Fellowship (MRF-2012-085), which allowed her to work on this volume. Core Beyond Trafficking and Slavery Supporters About Beyond Trafficking and Slavery A wide range of activists, academics, trade unions, governments and NGOs are currently trying to understand and address forced labour, trafficking and slavery. Beyond Trafficking and Slavery (BTS) occupies a unique position within this larger movement, one which combines the rigour of academic scholarship with the clarity of journalism and the immediacy of political activism. It is an independent, not-for-prof- it marketplace of ideas that uses evidence-based advocacy to tackle the political, economic, and social root causes of global exploitation, vul- nerability and forced labour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museum of London 1976-2007: Reimagining Metropolitan Narratives in Postcolonial London
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs The Museum of London 1976-2007: Reimagining Metropolitan Narratives in Postcolonial London Thesis How to cite: Aylett, Samuel Paul Tobias (2020). The Museum of London 1976-2007: Reimagining Metropolitan Narratives in Postcolonial London. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2019 Samuel Paul Tobias Aylett https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Redacted Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.000112e7 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk 1 The Museum of London 1976-2007: Reimagining Metropolitan Narratives in Postcolonial London Samuel Paul Tobias Aylett Supervised by Prof Karl A. Hack and Dr Susie West Submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at the Open University, October 2019 Some of the material in this thesis has been redacted in-line with copyright law, and until permission is granted. 2 Abstract Since the 1990s, cultural historians have developed exciting new scholarship charting shifting representations of empire at museums. Yet city museums feel strangely absent from these conversations, which have principally focused on national and regional museums in Britain, its former colonies and Europe. This thesis responds to this gap in the literature by mapping the shifting representation of empire and colonial histories at the Museum of London between 1976-2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Countering Colston” Campaign, 7/11/2016
    Press Release from “Countering Colston” Campaign, 7/11/2016 Bristol: We need to end this slave trader celebration season Edward Colston rose to the rank of deputy governor of the Royal African Company in the seventeenth century, when they had a monopoly over trade with West Africa, including the slave trade. During the period of its monopoly, the company shipped over 100,000 enslaved people across the Atlantic. Many more than 20,000 died on the passage. In Bristol, the first two weeks in November see several ceremonies and rituals celebrating Colston. These have been defended on the basis that Colston donated some of his profits to charity, thereby buying himself a reputation as a “philanthropist”. But it is obscene to call Colston a philanthropist (a “lover of humanity”), given that he pursued financial profit with such a callous disregard for human dignity and life, through decades of active political and economic involvement in kidnapping, enslavement and murder. It is an insult to the memory of the victims of slavery that Colston should be celebrated. Those organising the celebrations appear to consider them a benign element in the Bristolian civic and social calendar. A key organisation behind these events is the Society of Merchant Venturers, of which Edward Colston was a member. Venues where Colston is venerated include some of the best-known Church of England places of worship in our city. 4th November saw the Colston’s Girls’ School (CGS) ‘Commemoration Day’ service held at Bristol Cathedral. On this day, girls were supplied with and encouraged to wear a bronze chrysanthemum, Colston’s favourite flower.
    [Show full text]