Civil & Urban Engineering Department

CE-UY 3153 FALL 2019 COURSE OUTLINE

Instructor Dr. Magued Iskander, PE, F.ASCE Professor & Chair, Civil & Urban Engineering Dept. NYU Tandon School of Engineering, 15 MTC 6w-43 Email: [email protected] Phone: (646) 997-3016

Class Time: Mondays 3:00–4:30 PM and Wednesdays 3:00–4:30 PM

Substitute We are only required to meet every third Wednesday. I will try to finish Class Times all Wednesdays early in the semester and will use the rest of the time for makeup sessions for when I am out of town on professional travel commitments.

Laboratories: Mondays 11-2:30 PM NOTE: Some experiments will require that you take readings at other times. Important: You must attend every lab to pass this class.

Office Hours Mondays 4:30-5:30 PM, or by appointment

Required Reading: • B. Das & K. Sobhan, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 9’th ed. (Required) ISBN = 978-1305970939. You may use an older hardbound edition. However the soft cover international student edition is a different book • B. Das, Mechanics Laboratory Manual, Any edition (Required) (ISBN of 9’th Edition = 978-0190209667)

Teaching Assistants Mr. Antonio (Tony) Kodsy Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Mondays 10–11 am and Wednesday 5–6pm Office location: 15 MTC 6E-21C

Grader Ms. Giovanna Pipin Email: [email protected]

Page 1 of 6 Prerequisite • Mechanics of Materials CE 2123 or equivalent • Fluid Mechanics CE 2213 or equivalent

COURSE DESCRIPTION

Introduction to and engineering, including origin of ; volume/weight phase relationships; Soil classification (AASHTO and USCS); Soil permeability and seepage; ; ; and .

Engineering Analyses Content: 2 credits Engineering Design Content: 1 credit

COURSE OBJECTIVES

1. Become familiar with the subject and terminology of soil mechanics.

2. Become familiar with principles that govern the use and application of soil as an engineering material in civil and construction engineering.

3. Develop proficiency in the classification and quantitative evaluation of soil engineering properties.

4. Develop proficiency in solving fundamental problems related to soil mechanics, foundation engineering, and environmental geotechnology using theoretical and empirical geotechnical methods, including (1) Soil stress analysis, (2) effective stress, (3) consolidation, and (4) seepage.

5. Become familiar with standard laboratory soil testing equipment and be able to use them to determine soil properties.

6. Become familiar with mechanical behavior of soil including stress strain behavior, hydraulic conductivity; and volume change characteristics.

7. Prepare you for design courses in geotechnical engineering such as CE-UY 4173 Foundation Engineering.

COURSE OUTCOMES

At the conclusion of the course the students will be able to:

• Develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions (ABET Outcome 6)

• Exhibit an Understanding and Knowledge of Contemporary Geotechnical Issue.

Page 2 of 6 These outcomes are based on the accreditation requirements from the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET).

COURSE POLICY

1. Read the relevant portion of the textbook ahead of class, it will greatly aid your comprehension of the subject matter.

2. Notes: Take thorough notes during the lecture, because you are responsible for what is presented verbally as well as the textbook. After each lecture you should review your notes and study appropriate readings and work (not read) examples in the textbook.

3. Participation in class discussion is encouraged and expected. One of the objectives of this course is to help you develop your own communication skills.

4. Attendance in this course is mandatory. Missing more than five (5) lectures without a supported, documented and excused absence (i.e. Doctor, court, religious holidays, etc) will lower your final grade by 10%. Missed laboratory sessions will results in obtaining grade 0 for that session.

5. Homework will be assigned and collected regularly (typically due in one week). Home work will typically be assigned by the lab instructors. Students will submit their homework at the beginning of the lab session, a week from the time that it was assigned. Only selected problems will be graded (Typically, only 2 problems will be randomly selected from each assignment and graded). Because the teaching assistant may not have enough time to finish grading your homework before an exam, you are advised to make a duplicate copy of your homework before you turn it in. Solutions to homework problems will be posted on NYU Classes. Students are welcome to discuss the problems with each other, but all homework submittals must be done individually. Late homework assignments will be graded with late penalty; unless prior arrangements are made before the due date (requires a documented justifiable reason). Homework will not be accepted after the solution has been posted.

6. Quizzes: Unannounced quizzes may be given at any time during the semester. Quizzes will assess students on recent lecture and homework topics. No make-up quizzes will be administered. Any quiz or test missed without a documented and excused absence (i.e. Doctor, court, religious holidays, etc.) will represent a zero grade.

7. Midterm: A mid-term examination will be given during the class period. Actual date will be announced in class. Exam will be based on lecture and homework materials. The examination will contain numerical problems, and may also contain short answer questions and essays.

8. Final: The final is cumulative, covering all material covered in lectures and lab.

Page 3 of 6 9. Presentation of all work: All work must be neat, and final answers must be boxed. You will not get any credit for work that I or the TA cannot understand. Homework should either be typed in Mathcad or written neatly on 8.5” x 11” engineering paper. All loose papers MUST be stapled together. Put your name, the assignment number, page number, and the date the assignment is due at the top right corner of each page.

10. Cell phones Use and Texting are not allowed during the class and laboratory times.

LECTURE OUTLINE

Week Topic Required Reading in Principles of Geotechnical Engineering

1 Introduction to Soil Mechanics & Foundation Chapter 1 Engineering

1 Phase Diagrams & Weight Volume Relationships Chapter 3

2 Classification of Soils Chapter 2, 4, 5

3 Flow of Water in Soils, Hydraulic Gradient, Darcy’s Law Chapter 7

4 Compaction Chapter 6

5 Effective Stress, Soil Capillarity Chapter 9

6 Seepage and Flow nets Chapter 8

7,8 Consolidation & Settlement Chapter 11

9 Mid Term (TBD)

10-12 Shear Strength Chapter 10.1-10.2, 12

13-14 Lateral Earth Pressure (if time permits) Chapter 13

15 Final Examination

TENTATIVE LABORATORY OUTLINE

All Laboratory reports should be prepared individually and follow the recommended format. All Laboratory reports are due a week after completion of the respective experiment. Laboratory reports must be typed. NOTE: Changes to the following schedule, if any, will be announced on NYU Classes.

Week Topic(s) 1 Introduction to Soils laboratory, Lab Safety & Engineering reports & Measurement of Water Content

Page 4 of 6 2 Sieve Analyses 3 & Soil Classification 4 Standard & Modified Proctor Compaction Test 5 Measurement of Permeability (Falling & Constant Head Tests) 6, 7 Consolidation 8 Review for Midterm 9 Direct Shear Test 10 Unconfined Compression Test 11 Triaxial Test demonstration 12 Demonstration of field testing apparatus 13 Review 14 Lab Test

GRADING

Grades will be based on the following: • Quizzes (Four ½ -hour quizzes. We will count the top 3) = 15% • Mid-term (closed book, equation sheet provided) = 20% • Final Exam (Cumulative, closed book) = 40% • Lab reports & home works = 20%. This grade is assigned by the TA and added to my total. Note that according to the CE department policy, 20% of your lab grade is assigned to presentation • Lab test = 5% • You must attend every lab in order to pass this course. • The midterm and final will contain material covered in the labs.

The following grading policy will be in effect:

A/A- Excellent performance B+/B/B- Good/adequate performance i.e. perform the assigned work without distinguishing one’s self. C+/C/C- Deficient but passing performance. D+/D I rarely give Ds. F Failing I Incomplete grade is given for valid reasons such as illness or other critical emergency, such as death of a close family member. Work related excuses are never a critical emergency. If work is not completed in one semester, the registrar automatically changes an “I” to become an “F”.

SUBSTITUTE CLASS TIMES

Every effort will be made to maintain all the university scheduled class times. However, substitute classes may be required to make up for snow emergencies or instructor out of town professional travel commitments.

Page 5 of 6 COMPUTER FACILITIES

As an engineer (or soon to be one) you are expected to conduct yourself professionally. As an engineer you are expected to be inherently neat and organized. In this class professional conduct includes timely submission of assignments, punctual attendance, and professional communications. Engineering employers often consider communication skills to be as important as engineering skills in rating prospective employees. At this stage of your career you should become accustomed to professional presentation tools such as word processors, spreadsheets, charting and drafting software, and presentation software.

All Tandon undergraduate students are expected to have a laptop computer. You are expected to use computers to present your work.

LIBRARY FACILITIES

Bern Dibner Library at the Metrotech and Bobst library at Washington Square are available for your use. As a student at Tandon, you have access to electronic search facilities through the library web page. If a paper or a book is not available at the library, you can request a copy through inter-library loan. The New York Public Library science section located at Madison and 34’th in Manhattan is also a useful resource available to you.

ACADEMIC HONESTY

Academic Honesty is assumed of all students, I will enforce a zero-tolerance policy with respect to academic honesty, which is defined to include any act to misrepresent someone’s else’s work as your own. Please refer to the university code of conduct for further details, it can be found at: engineering.nyu.edu/student-code-conduct.

Tandon’s code of conduct covers plagiarism, cheating, fabrication, and facilitating dishonesty. Academic dishonesty may include misrepresentation, deception, dishonesty, or any act of falsification committed by a student to influence a grade or other academic evaluation. Academic dishonesty also includes intentionally damaging the academic work of others or assisting other students in acts of dishonesty.

FINAL COMMENT

Good luck to you in this course. As with anything in life, you will get out of this course, as much as you put into it. Please do not hesitate to ask questions in class, or to contact me at any time. Any specific comments on how this class may be improved are particularly welcomed.

Page 6 of 6 [Engineering

Soil Mechanics

Henry Petroski

Children play a hand game in which a structure matches up with the street and does not closed fist represents a rock, two extended sink over time. These and other schemes for fingers, scissors, and an open palm, paper. building foundations that could not reach to At an agreed-upon signal, each of two players bedrock have become a fundamental part of the extends a hand in one of these configurations, art and science of civil engineering. and the winner is determined by the mnemonic, "rock breaks scissors, scissors cut paper, paper Soil's Confounding Effects covers rock." The same game, modified slightly, For more than eight centuries now, however, the could serve to introduce the engineering enter? leaning Tower of Pisa has been an effective prise of building structures on the earth, with the reminder that engineers do not always build on fist again representing rock, an extended finger firm foundations. Other towers and buildings, structure and an open palm soil, the relatively such as the Guadalupe National Shrine in thin layer of "unconsolidated sediments and Mexico City, are also noticeably tilted; some deposits of solid particles derived from the disin? reveal the telltale signs of differential settlement tegration of rocks" otherwise known as earth or through cracked walls. Some prominent struc? dirt. In this case rock supports structure, struc? tures have settled more uniformly. The ture displaces soil and soil covers rock. This also Washington Monument, begun in 1848, had set? suggests the sometimes surprising conditions tled almost six inches by the time its interrupted that determine success or failure in a significant construction was completed in 1884, with a proportion of structural engineering projects. modified foundation. Settlement of the Palace of The ideal foundation for a large structure? Fine Arts in Mexico City was more noticeable, whether it be a suspension bridge tower, a steel for what was once its ground floor became its skyscraper or a concrete dam?is sound bedrock. basement over time. Sometimes, nearby con? However, the underlying construction struction can affect long-standing structures. sites does not always provide such ideal condi? This happened to Trinity Church in Boston tions, and bedrock is often beyond easy reach. when ground across Copley Square was exca? Furthermore, bedrock is sometimes inadequate vated to build the John Hancock Tower. as a foundation because of inherent defects. Some structures are actually built of soil, which Therefore engineers have learned to work with is said to be civilization's oldest building material, the hand that nature deals them. The Romans and failures of earth dams were endemic through developed techniques for sinking piles into soft the 19th century and not unknown in the 20th. riverbeds, so that bridge piers rested on founda? Teton Dam, a massive earth structure across the tions firm and deep enough to resist the settling Teton River Canyon in southeastern Idaho, was and scouring actions that must have led to the built on volcanic rock that was unusually frac? collapse of many an earlier bridge. The master tured. The dam failed in 1976, just six months after builders of Gothic cathedrals directed the laying its completion, while its reservoir was being filled. of broad-based foundations to provide proper Concrete dams have not been immune to soil footings for their edifices, lest the masonry walls problems, and the failure in 1928 of California's St. crack because of uneven movement in the Francis Dam, located 45 miles northwest of Los ground. In more recent times, engineers of tall Angeles, was traced to a defective foundation on buildings have learned to erect them over broad rock?a fault and a landslide played roles in mats or rafts at depths that ensure sufficient destroying the dam. The release of 12 billion gal? buoyancy that the ground floor of the completed lons of water killed approximately 450 people. Explaining such failures, and obviating similar Henry Petroski is Aleksandar S. Vesic Professor of Civil failures in future construction projects, requires an Engineering and chairman of the Department of Civil and understanding of the nature and behavior of soils, Environmental Engineering at Duke University. Address: Box especially under changing conditions of water 90287, Durham, NC 27708-0287 content, consolidation and structural loading.

American Scientist, Volume 84

This content downloaded from 128.122.136.118 on Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:01:53 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Father of Soil Mechanics The engineering science of soil mechanics, whose development was motivated by such problems, takes the solution of these problems as its chal? lenge. It is generally agreed that its roots are in the work of the 18th-century French civil engi? neer Charles Augustin Coulomb, whose studies of friction forces gave engineers a rudimentary means to determine the steepness at which a pile of sand or an earth embankment would become unstable and result in a landslide. Throughout the 19th century, however, few mechanical prop? erties other than the so-called angle of repose and bearing pressure were measured for soils, and by the end of the century Coulomb's work was dis? counted by working engineers. Such important soil variables as density, water content and com? pressibility remained to be considered, and they would not be in any rational way until an Austrian engineer named Terzaghi found himself assigned to Turkey to lecture on construction and l&^B^B^B^B^B^B^B^H/^&tn ^^^^^^^ foundations. Fortunately, that assignment, and the time for experiment and reflection that it pro? vided, came after the engineer had already gained invaluable experience in the field. The story of this engineer's life and career, as recount? ed by his students and colleagues, sometimes takes on mythic proportions, something Terzaghi Figure 1. Karl Terzaghi, the founder of the engineering science of himself seems not to have discouraged. soil mechanics. (Drawing by Eugene Montgomery, courtesy of Duke Karl Terzaghi was born in in 1883, University.) when it was the capital of the Austrian province of Bohemia. Being descended from a long line of increasingly aware of the great discrepancy Austrian army officers, he was naturally sent to between the state of the art of reinforced concrete military school. But the military held no attrac? design, which was quantitative, and that of foun? tion for him, and he went on to attend the dation design, which was not. He began to think Technical University in , where he acquired that the problems of foundations and earthwork the dueling scars that marked him for life. He were attributable "only to gaps in our knowledge graduated in 1904 with a degree in mechanical of the relationship between geological conditions engineering, a field that would never excite him, and engineering consequences." The gaps could but while in school he also was attracted to geol? be closed, he believed, by failure analysis?that is, ogy and showed promise as a writer. After fur? "by collecting and digesting case records in which ther studies that concentrated on geological top? each event, such as a foundation failure or the fail? ics, Terzaghi began working for a Viennese engi? ure of an earth dam, was meticulously correlated neering firm that specialized in reinforced con? with the geological conditions at the site." crete structures and hydroelectric power, which Not surprisingly, Terzaghi was not the only naturally involved the construction of dams. person in the world struck by the paucity of After three years working mainly in the Swiss understanding of soil as an engineering materi? Alps, Terzaghi became restless with his assigned al. In the , in particular, the work, and in time he found himself in charge of Reclamation Service was involved in the con? the geologic and hydrographic survey for a struction of a large number of dams and irriga? hydroelectric power project proposed in the hin? tion systems under widely varying geologic terland near the Adriatic Coast of . conditions, and the director of the service Terzaghi then secluded himself in the Alps to agreed with Terzaghi that this was a rare oppor? work on a long paper reporting on his Croatian tunity to take part in a large-scale experiment survey. While in the Alps, Terzaghi heard from a that might provide much needed insight. Thus friend in Leningrad of the stoppage of work on a Terzaghi spent two years in the western states monumental structure in that city because build? observing and collecting data. But once back in ings surrounding the excavation had begun to set? Europe, he became discouraged when his tle and crack. Terzaghi offered to take charge of attempts to make sense of it led to naught. the project for the contractor, and in a short time had everything under control. Afterwards, he par? Terzaghi Joins Academia ticipated in the design and construction of other drew Terzaghi into the Austrian projects in northwest , and he became Army, but in 1916 he found himself ordered to

1996 September-October 429

This content downloaded from 128.122.136.118 on Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:01:53 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms dug, landslides in the famed Culebra Cut through the continental divide had provided further dramatic and incontrovertible warnings that engineers "were overstepping the limits of our ability to predict the consequences of our actions." The situation in Panama, in addition to continuing dam failures and building settlings, had led the American Society of Civil Engineers in 1913 to appoint a committee to look into such matters. This committee stressed "the impor? tance of expressing the properties of soils by numerical values." Similar realizations came in Sweden, where railway work was accompanied by catastrophic landslides, and in Germany, where massive retaining walls were moving in unacceptable ways. But Terzaghi was to have the key theoretical insights. After the war, Terzaghi remained in Constan? tinople as a lecturer at , then often referred to as the American Robert College and now known as Bogazi^ University. At Robert, he taught mechanical-engineering courses while pursuing his research into soils. Then, in a reflec? tive mood in 1918, he "wrote down in one day and on one sheet of paper" a program of experi? ments that he expected would take two or three years. In fact, his efforts would extend over seven years. Working alone, without access to the con? temporary literature, and using equipment that included cigar boxes and parts scrounged togeth? er from the college dump, he came slowly to understand the mechanics of soils. In 1920 he published a "first report" on his work, under the Americanized name of Dr. Charles Terzaghi, in Engineering News-Record. An accompanying edito? rial, "Research in Soil Mechanics," not only coined a name for the new field but also declared Figure 2. Karl Terzaghi (right) and Ralph Peck at the third interna? "the problem presented by earth as an engineer? tional soils conference in Switzerland in 1953. (Photograph courtesy ing material" to be "so important that it deserves of Ralph Peck.) to be ranked as the outstanding research problem in civil engineering." The editorial, which also accept an assignment as a professor of founda? described other approaches to the problem, con? tions and roads in Constantinople, at the Imperial cluded that Terzaghi's fundamental research into School of Engineers that one of his former teach? determining "the mere facts of earth action" her? ers was reorganizing. According to Terzaghi, "I alded "the opening of an avenue of progress myself felt no urge whatsoever to teach because I which promises to lead on toward more definite was too deeply pre-occupied with my own igno? knowledge of earth." rance." Nevertheless, the assignment gave him an Terzaghi continued his work and developed a opportunity to reconsider his data from America, model describing how water carried in micro? and he realized the cause of his former impasse: scopic voids gradually transferred the loads At that time, soils were classified in strictly geo? imposed on it to the grain structure of clays. He logical terms?coarse sand, fine sand, soft clay, first presented a mathematical model for this con? stiff clay and the like?with each such designa? solidation process in a 1923 article that received tion including soils of widely different engineer? little attention. However, when he presented a ing properties. Terzaghi concluded that what was paper on the topic at the First International needed was a means of measuring quantitatively Conference on Applied Mechanics, held in Delft, a variety of material properties that would distin? Holland, in 1924, "the response was instanta? guish soils in a unique way and that would, not neous and enthusiastic." Terzaghi's 1925 book, incidentally, enable engineers to predict by calcu? Erdbaumechanik auf bodenphysikalischer Grundlage, lation such phenomena as bearing strength and led to his being offered a visiting lectureship at settlement rate. the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which Such realizations were not unique to Terzaghi he accepted. Later, looking back on his seminal at the time. When the Panama Canal was being contributions, Terzaghi confessed that he "had

430 American Scientist, Volume 84

This content downloaded from 128.122.136.118 on Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:01:53 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms only laid the foundation: the edifice remained to be held in June 1936. The university would not be created." He would also attribute his success to only finance the conference but also provide liv? the fact that he "had the urge, the opportunity, ing quarters and other amenities for the atten? and the patience in addition to the qualifications dees. A registration fee of five dollars, raised to required for engineering the revolution which ten for late registrants, included the Proceedings, had already become inevitable." the third volume of which contained a record of With MIT as a base of operations, Terzaghi the conference and a detailed treasurer's report. began to consult on a wide variety of earthwork The conference drew a total membership of 206, and foundation problems, and he incorporated with another 181 absentee members being sent his practical experience into his teaching of soil the Proceedings. The members in attendance were mechanics. In 1929, Terzaghi accepted a profes? welcomed to the first official event of Harvard's sorship at the Technical University in and tercentenary year by President James B. Conant, thus returned to Europe. Among the group of who proceeded to review the history and devel? disciples that Terzaghi had left in America was opment of the university. The address of the pres? , a native Austrian and grad? ident of the conference was delivered not by the uate of the Technical University in Vienna, who Charles Terzaghi whose articles had graced the went from studying under Terzaghi at MIT to pages of Engineering News-Record, but by a lion? becoming an assistant professor in the Graduate ized "Karl von Terzaghi, Professor at the School of Engineering at . In Technische Hochschule in Vienna," and the the ensuing years, it became increasingly clear to Proceedings contain about a half dozen papers by Casagrande and to others that the growing num? "Dr. Karl v. Terzaghi." ber of soil-mechanics specialists, let alone practic? The distinguished Terzaghi returned to Vienna ing engineers, were having difficulty in keeping in the fall and attended to his expanding consult? up with the rapid developments in approaches to ing practice. With growing unrest in Europe, how? problems in earth and foundation engineering, ever, he came back to the United States in the fall and there developed a growing interest in hold? of 1938, as Visiting Lecturer in Soil Mechanics at ing a conference on the subject. The conference Harvard. That same fall, Terzaghi was invited to organized by Casagrande, which was also a lecture in Chicago, and he chose the title "The means to bring Terzaghi back to the U.S. for the Dangers of Tunneling in Soft Clays Beneath Large spring of 1936, proved to be a model of individ? Cities." His remarks were equally interesting to ual and institutional initiative. the city's Department of Subways and Traction, Harvard University accepted the suggestion which had undertaken to build a subway, and the that it sponsor, as an official part of its tercente? State Street Property Owners' Association, which nary celebration, the International Conference on worried about the consequences for nearby struc? Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, to tures, and both groups wished to retain Terzaghi

Figure 3. Karl Terzaghi (Ieft> and Ralph Peck at Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela in 1956. (Photograph courtesy of Ralph Peck)

1996 September-October 431

This content downloaded from 128.122.136.118 on Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:01:53 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms as a consultant. He eventually chose to consult for Terzaghi asked Peck to coauthor such a work, the city, which agreed to his fee of an unprecedent? which would appear in 1948 as Soil Mechanics in ed $100 a day and to the stipulation that a labora? Engineering Practice and become a seminal text. tory be set up and supervised by the individual of With his continuing teaching, publishing and Terzaghi7 s choice and under his direct supervi? worldwide consulting, Terzaghi's reputation was sion. Who that assistant was to be was an interest? secure. In 1946 he had become Professor of the ing accident of the times. Practice of Civil Engineering, a title said to have been created by Harvard especially for him. He A Fortuitous Collaboration began to turn down consulting jobs that did not Ralph Peck, almost 30 years younger than present a fresh challenge, and thus he began to Terzaghi, had a Doctor of Civil Engineering work increasingly in , where the degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, geology and foundation conditions were unusual? with an emphasis on structures and mathemat? ly complex. The Coast Mountains may also have ics. His thesis related to the stiffness of suspen? evoked memories of his early work in Europe. sion bridges, a topic inspired by the work of the Among the projects that occupied Terzaghi's prominent bridge engineer David Steinman, last years were a series of dams in British who was supportive of Peck's efforts. After Columbia. According to Peck, one of these pro? receiving his degree in 1937, Peck attended the jects, Mission Dam, was "so complex and diffi? Detailing School of the American Bridge cult from a geotechnical point of view that Company, in whose drafting room he after? many engineers had considered it to be infeasi wards worked. When bridge work slowed ble." Terzaghi died in 1963, and two years later, down and Peck found himself laid off, however, at a memorial service at the Sixth International he looked for a job wherever he could find one. Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation The dean at the Armour (later Illinois) Institute Engineering in Montreal, Mission Dam was of Technology in Chicago told Peck there were renamed Terzaghi Dam. Such an honor is rare no openings there in structures, but that if he for any engineer, but few areas of modern engi? could study either hydraulics, at Iowa, or soil neering are as inextricably linked with a single mechanics, at Harvard, he would have a posi? individual as soil mechanics is with Terzaghi. tion at Armour. A job offer from the bridge firm Indeed, the field itself stands as a memorial to of Waddell & Hardesty came shortly thereafter, his pioneering work, which so defined it. but by that time Peck had determined to study soils and had finalized plans to go to Harvard. Acknowledgment As a nondegree student, Peck was able to join I am grateful to Ralph B. Peck and to Richard E. courses in the middle of the semester and took an Goodman, who is working on a biography of unorthodox route to learning soil mechanics. He Terzaghi, for their helpful comments on the manu? gained laboratory experience running consolida? script of this article. tion tests and was sitting in on a course in statistics when Terzaghi needed someone to help him with Bibliography English terminology in that field for his book in Bjerrum, L., A. Casagrande, R. B. Peck and A. W. Skemp progress, Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Later, when ton. 1960. From Theory to Practice in Soil Mechanics: Selec? Terzaghi was asked whom he wished to oversee tions from the Writings of Karl Terzaghi. New York: Wiley. the soil mechanics laboratory for the Chicago Donnicliff, John, and Don U. Deere, eds. 1991. Judgment in Geotechnical Engineering: The Professional Legacy of Ralph Subway project, Casagrande's suggestion of Peck B. Peck. Vancouver: BiTech Publishers, Ltd. was immediately taken. The three-year project, a Jumikis, Alfreds R. 1967. Introduction to Soil Mechanics. milestone in the development of the practical Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand. application of soil mechanics, was interrupted by Leonoff, Cyril E. 1994. A Dedicated Team: Klohn Leonoff Consult? the consequences of Pearl Harbor. Afterwards, his ing Engineers, 1951-1991. Vancouver: Klohn Leonoff, Ltd. work on the Chicago Subway project led to Peck's Proceedings of the International Conference on Soil Mechanics association not with Armour but with the and Foundation Engineering. 1936. Cambridge, Mass.: University of Illinois, in Urbana, where he would Harvard University. spend a large part of his distinguished career. Terzaghi, Charles. 1920. Old earth-pressure theories and In the meantime, Terzaghi was continuing to new test results. Engineering News-Record, September 30, pp. 632-637. work on his book manuscript, and Peck became Terzaghi, Charles. 1925. Principles of soil mechanics [in involved in reviewing it. His help was acknowl? eight parts]. Engineering News-Record, November 5-De edged in the preface to Theoretical Soil Mechanics, cember 31, passim, pp. 742-1,068, passim. which appeared in 1943 with the dedication, Terzaghi, Karl. 1943. Theoretical Soil Mechanics. New York: "To Harvard University, in appreciation of its Wiley. liberal encouragement of the pursuit of knowl? Terzaghi, Karl, and Ralph B. Peck. 1948. Soil Mechanics in edge." Even before that book was published, Engineering Practice. New York: Wiley. Peck had begun to suggest to Terzaghi that he work on a second volume, which would serve "Computing Science" will return in the Novem? as an undergraduate textbook and would ber-December 1996 issue of American Scientist: include applied aspects of soil mechanics.

432 American Scientist, Volume 84

This content downloaded from 128.122.136.118 on Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:01:53 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms