DOCSLIB.ORG

Ass of Pot Front Cover Vol II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ass of Pot Front Cover Vol II 954 Parc Cybi, Holyhead: post excavation assessment of potential report volume II: specialist reports GAT Project No. 1701 Report No. 954 June 2011 Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Gwynedd Gwynedd Archaeological Trust Craig Beuno, Ffordd y Garth, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2RT Parc Cybi, Holyhead: post excavation assessment of potential report volume II: specialist reports Report No. 954 Prepared for Atkins on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government June 2011 By C. M. Batt, N. Bermingham, Evan Chapman, S.J. Clelland, Hilary Cool, Mary Davis, B.R. Gearey, Jonathan Goodwin, Pam Grinter, Adam Gwilt, T. Hill, David Jenkins, Thérèse Kearns, E.Kitchen, Kristina Krawiec, Helen Lewis, Frances Lynch, Peter Marshall, Andrew Moss, Phil Parkes, Alison Sheridan, George Smith, E. Tetlow, Peter Webster, Michael Wysocki, and Tim Young Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Gwynedd Gwynedd Archaeological Trust Craig Beuno, Ffordd y Garth, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2RT PARC CYBI ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL REPORT VOLUME II SPECIALIST REPORTS Contents List of specialists ............................................................................................................................................5 Part I: prehistoric ceramics .............................................................................................................................7 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................7 Methodology...............................................................................................................................................7 Results ........................................................................................................................................................7 General considerations of distribution......................................................................................................10 Evaluation of potential..............................................................................................................................10 Proposals for further work........................................................................................................................11 Appendix I: Bronze Age/Beaker Pottery from evaluation trenches..........................................................12 Part II: Roman pottery ..................................................................................................................................13 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................13 Methodology.............................................................................................................................................13 Results ......................................................................................................................................................13 Discussion and Evaluation of potential ....................................................................................................14 Proposals ..................................................................................................................................................15 References ................................................................................................................................................16 Table 1: Catalogue of Roman pottery.......................................................................................................16 Appendix I: Roman pottery report from evaluation trenches ...................................................................18 Part III: medieval and post medieval ceramics, clay pipes and glass ...........................................................20 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................20 Introduction and methodology..................................................................................................................20 The ceramic finds .....................................................................................................................................20 The clay pipes...........................................................................................................................................22 The glass...................................................................................................................................................22 Evaluation of potential..............................................................................................................................23 References ................................................................................................................................................23 Appendix 1a: Catalogue of ceramic vessel sherds from Parc Cybi. .........................................................24 Appendix 1b: Catalogue of clay pipes from Parc Cybi. ...........................................................................41 Appendix 1c: Catalogue of glass finds from Parc Cybi............................................................................42 Appendix 2: Ceramic ware types by context. ...........................................................................................46 Appendix 3: Table of spot dates for stratified contexts. ...........................................................................53 Part IV: Roman Glass...................................................................................................................................56 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................56 Methodology.............................................................................................................................................56 Results ......................................................................................................................................................56 Evaluation of potential..............................................................................................................................57 References ................................................................................................................................................57 Catalogue of Roman and early glass.........................................................................................................58 Part V: Flint and chert ..................................................................................................................................59 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................59 Methodology.............................................................................................................................................59 Results ......................................................................................................................................................59 Research Potential ....................................................................................................................................62 Proposals for further analysis ...................................................................................................................63 Appendix I: Flint report on finds from the evaluation trenches................................................................63 Part VI: Stone objects...................................................................................................................................65 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................65 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................65 Results ......................................................................................................................................................65 Research Potential ....................................................................................................................................69 Part VII: Metal objects .................................................................................................................................71 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................71 Methodology.............................................................................................................................................71 Results ......................................................................................................................................................71 Evaluation of potential..............................................................................................................................72 Catalogue of metal objects .......................................................................................................................72 Part VIII: Shale Objects................................................................................................................................76
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unexpected Discovery of a Funnel Beaker Culture Feature at the Kraków Spadzista (Kraków-Zwierzyniec 4) Site
    FOLIA QUATERNARIA 87, KRAKÓW 2019, 5–26 DOI: 10.4467/21995923FQ.19.001.11494 PL ISSN 0015-573X UNEXPECTED DISCOvery OF A FUNNEL BEAKER culture feature at ThE KRAKÓW Spadzista (KRAKÓW-zWIERzYNIEC 4) SITE Jarosław Wilczyński1, Marek Nowak2, Aldona Mueller-Bieniek3, Magda Kapcia3, Magdalena Moskal-del hoyo3 Authors’ addresses: 1 – Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland, e-mail: [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0002-9786- 0693; 2 – Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University, Gołębia 11, 31-007 Kraków, Poland, e-mail (cor- responding author): [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0001-7220-6495; 3 – W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland; A. Mueller-Bieniek, e-mail: a.mueller@ botany.pl, ORCID: 0000-0002-5330-4580; M. Kapcia, e-mail: [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0001- 7117-6108; M. Moskal-del hoyo, e-mail: [email protected], ORCID: 0000-0003-3632-7227 Abstract. The paper presents a Neolithic feature discovered in trench G of the widely-known Paleolithic Gravettian site at Kraków Spadzista. Pottery and lithic artefacts as well as archaeobotanical data and radiocarbon dates demonstrate the existence of a stable human occupation with an agricultural economy. Due to the small number of distinctive fragments of pottery, both the Wyciąże-złotniki group and the Funnel Beaker culture have to be taken into account in the discussion on the cultural attribution of the feature. The obtained absolute dates make a connection with the latter unit more probable. Keywords: Kraków Spadzista, Neolithic, pottery, lithics, archaeobotany INTRODUCTION Location of the site Kraków Spadzista site is located on the high northern headland of Sikornik, a two- peaked hill in the eastern part of the Sowiniec Range in Kraków measuring over 3 km in length (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (This Accepted Version May Not Correspond Exactly to the Published
    5 A sheep’s eye view Land division, livestock and people in later prehistoric Somerset, UK Clare Randall Fields and field systems in later prehistoric British archaeology have generally been discussed in relation to territory or land tenure. They are also frequently assumed to relate purely to arable agriculture. Alongside this, we also tend not to situate livestock animals within landscapes. Increasingly, morphological features of fields can be identified as having use in animal handling. Consequently field system morphology, and changes to layouts over time, enable their re-examination in relation to pastoral and arable husbandry (and the interplay between them), and consideration as to why differing approaches may have been adopted within the same landscape at different times. This provides models which, focussing on pastoral husbandry, are potentially applicable to a range of places and periods. The second and first millennium BC bounded landscapes surrounding the hillfort at Cadbury, Castle, Somerset, UK, reveal an intimate relationship between the occupiers of the hillfort, sites in its environs, livestock, and the landscape. A series of different forms of land division and organisation from the earlier Bronze Age onwards can be compared with both faunal and plant macro-fossil data from within that landscape. Different forms of layout appear to reflect different types of strategy and approach in later prehistoric farming. During the second and first millennium BC changes can be observed between different forms of highly extensive pastoral farming and closely integrated and intensive systems. The explanation would seem to be more social than practical in origin, but discerning this is reliant on large scale field survey, and integration of multiple strands of information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earthworks at Altheim
    Sprawozdania Archeologiczne, 2017, 69, s. 71-82 SPRAWOZDANIA ARCHEOLOGICZNE 69, 2017 PL ISSN 0081-3834 DOI: 10.23858/SA69.2017.004 Thomas Saile*, Martin Posselt**, Bernhard Zirngibl*** THE EARTHWORKS AT ALTHEIM ABSTRACT Saile T., Posselt M. and Zirngibl B. 2017. The earthworks at Altheim. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 68, 71-82. In 2012, fi eldwork recommenced at the Altheim earthwork, discovered more than a century ago. The inves- tigation in its immediate environs revealed a second ditched enclosure from the Altheim period, south-east of the previously known structure. The two enclosures are spatially related to one another. It was found that se- veral decimetres of soil have been eroded during the last hundred years in the area of the north earthwork; the very substance of both monuments is acutely threatened. The fi rst radiocarbon datings, carried out on samples of domestic animal bone, allow both enclosures to be dated to the 37th/36th century BC and suggest a temporal sequence of the ditches. Certain earlier observations, namely the high proportion of arrowheads among the fl aked stone tools and the very low proportion of bones from wild animals, were confi rmed by the new excava- tion. The southwest-northeast orientation of the structures’ long axes permits an archaeoastronomical interpre- tation: knowledge obtained from the observation of natural phenomena was transferred to architecture. The new investigation sheds further doubt on the interpretation of the enclosures as fortifi cations. Keywords: Later Neolithic, Altheim culture,
    [Show full text]
  • 1267-08 Louwe Kooijmans 22.Indd 261 03-06-2008 15:06:29 262 PIERRE PÉTREQUIN ET AL
    ANALECTA PRAEHISTORICA LEIDENSIA This article appeared in: PUBLICATION OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHAEOLOGY LEIDEN UNIVERSITY BETWEEN FORAGING AND FARMING AN EXTENDED BROAD SPECTRUM OF PAPERS PRESENTED TO LEENDERT LOUWE KOOIJMANS EDITED BY HARRY FOKKENS, BRYONY J. COLES, ANNELOU L. VAN GIJN, JOS P. KLEIJNE, HEDWIG H. PONJEE AND CORIJANNE G. SLAppENDEL LEIDEN UNIVERSITY 2008 1267-08_Louwe Kooijmans_Overdruk1 1 16-06-2008 13:39:01 Series editors: Corrie Bakels / Hans Kamermans Copy editors of this volume: H arry Fokkkens, Bryony Coles, Annelou van Gijn, Jos Kleijne, Hedwig Ponjee and Corijanne Slappendel Editors of illustrations: Harry Fokkkens, Medy Oberendorff and Karsten Wentink Copyright 2008 by the Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden ISSN 0169-7447 ISBN 978-90-73368-23-1 Subscriptions to the series Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia and single volumes can be ordered exclusively at: Faculty of Archaeology P.O. Box 9515 NL-2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands 1267-08_Louwe Kooijmans_Overdruk2 2 16-06-2008 13:39:02 22 Neolithic Alpine axeheads, from the Continent to Great Britain, the Isle of Man and Ireland Pierre Pétrequin Alison Sheridan Serge Cassen Michel Errera Estelle Gauthier Lutz Klassen Nicolas Le Maux Yvan Pailler 22.1 INTRODUCTION view as 21st century ‘technicians’, once the axeheads had Within the source area from which Alpine axeheads passed beyond the geographical zone of their fi rst users, circulated around western Europe, two groups of quarries located to the northwest and west of the Alps, they took on and of secondary exploitation sites close to the outcrops have a socially-determined role over and above their primary func- recently been identifi ed in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilities, Entanglements and Transformations in Neolithic Societies of the Swiss Plateau (3900 – 3500 BC)
    Bern Working Papers on Prehistoric Archaeolog y No. 1 Institute of Archaeological Sciences Prehistory Albert Hafner Caroline Heitz Regine Stapfer March 2016 Mobilities, Entanglements, Transformations. Outline of a Research Project on Pottery Pratices in Neolithic Wetland Sites of the Swiss Plateau Project’s Title: Mobilities, Entanglements and Transformations in Neolithic Societies of the Swiss Plateau (3900 – 3500 BC) Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation Project No 100011_156205 Project management: Prof. Dr. Albert Hafner Institute of Archaeological Sciences Prehistory University of Bern Switzerland Project management: Prof. Dr. Vincent Serneels Department of Geosciences Section of Earth Sciences, Archaeometry University of Fribourg Switzerland Impressum Series ISSN: 2297- 8607 e-ISBN: 978-3-906813-12-7 (e-print) DOI: 10.7892/boris.77649 Editors: Albert Hafner and Caroline Heitz Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Prehistory University of Bern Muesmattstrasse 27 CH-3012 Bern This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Inter- national License English language editing: Andrew Lawrence, Sharon Shellock, Ariane Ballmer Layout: Designer FH in Visual Communication Susanna Kaufmann Photographs (front page): Today’s shore of Lake Neuchâtel, Pfyn and Michelsberg pottery from the Neolithic bog settlement of 2 Thayngen-Weier, Northern Switzerland (Caroline Heitz). Table of Contents 1. Aims and research questions 4 2. State of research 5 3. Case studies 10 4. Mixed methods research-design 13 5. Some words on applied methods
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Genetic Code - Grapevine and Olive
    THE MEDITERRANEAN GENETIC CODE - GRAPEVINE AND OLIVE Edited by Danijela Poljuha and Barbara Sladonja The Mediterranean Genetic Code - Grapevine and Olive http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/3442 Edited by Danijela Poljuha and Barbara Sladonja Contributors Stefano Meneghetti, Zohreh Rabiei, Sattar Tahmasebi Enferadi, José Eiras-Dias, Jorge Cunha, Pedro Fevereiro, Margarida Teixeira-Santos, João Brazão, Massimo Muganu, Marco Paolocci, Mirza Musayev, Zeynal Akparov, Lidija Tomić, Branka Javornik, Nataša Štajner, Rosa Adela Arroyo-Garcia, Eugenio Revilla, Denis Rusjan, Jernej Jakše, Rotondi Annalisa, Catherine Marie Breton, André Berville, Anthony Ananga, Vasil Georgiev, Joel W. Ochieng, Bobby Phills, Violetka Tsolova, Devaiah Kambiranda Published by InTech Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Copyright © 2013 InTech All chapters are Open Access distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. However, users who aim to disseminate and distribute copies of this book as a whole must not seek monetary compensation for such service (excluded InTech representatives and agreed collaborations). After this work has been published by InTech, authors have the right to republish it, in whole or part, in any publication of which they are the author, and to make other personal use of the work. Any republication, referencing or personal use of the work must explicitly identify the original source. Notice Statements and opinions expressed in the chapters are these of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of the editors or publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Outcomes of the Whitehawk Community Archaeology Project, Including a Post-Excavation Assessment and Updated Project Design
    WHITEHAWK CAMP, MANOR HILL, BRIGHTON, EAST SUSSEX NGR: 532938 104787 (TQ 32938 04787) Scheduled Ancient Monument: 1010929 A REPORT ON THE OUTCOMES OF THE WHITEHAWK COMMUNITY ARCHAEOLOGY PROJECT, INCLUDING A POST-EXCAVATION ASSESSMENT AND UPDATED PROJECT DESIGN ASE Project No: P106 Site Code: WHC14 ASE Report No: 2015222 OASIS ID: By Jon Sygrave With contributions by Luke Barber, Trista Clifford, Anna Doherty, Hayley Forsyth, Karine Le Hégarat, Andy Maxted, Dawn Elise Mooney, Hilary Orange, Dr Paola Ponce, Don Richardson Illustrations by Justin Russell November 2016 Abstract This report presents the results of the Whitehawk Camp Community Archaeology Project carried out by the Whitehawk Camp Partnership between April 2014 and July 2015. The work was generously funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund. This report details the background to the project, the methodology by which it was undertaken, the results of the archaeological fieldwork, the reassessment of the archive material, the potential and significance of the archaeological results, presents a new research agenda for the site and outlines the scope of potential future projects. This report does not detail all the project outcomes and the reader is directed to Appendix 5: An Evaluation Report to the Heritage Lottery Fund on the Outcomes of the Whitehawk Camp Community Archaeology Project (Orange et al 2015) for a summary of the main results of the Project including how successful it was in engaging with target audiences, what changes to heritage, community and people the project has brought about, project legacy and future work. The 2014-5 excavations, targeted on anomalies identified in the preceding geophysical survey (ASE 2014b), encountered a small number of features and a large unstratified finds assemblage associated with allotment gardens, the dumping of refuse and activity probably related to Brighton Racecourse dating to the 19th- 21st centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Centuries, They Are for Your Information on How to Use the Book
    Mapping History A Timeline Book of the Centuries by Michele Quigley Contents: • Cover page • Introduction • Labeling worksheet sample • Blank labeling worksheet • 2 page spread sample pages - 13th century BC • 2 page spread sample pages - 13th century AD • Full color cover • Bookplate page • 3 blank pages • 48 lined, columned pages • 3 blank pages Printing Instructions: The left side of every page is intended to be blank. Therefore you will simply print this file as is and your book will be complete. After printing you can either 3 hole punch the pages and put them in a binder of take them to a printer to be bound together Please note: The first eight pages --cover page, introduction, labeling worksheets and sample pages-- are not meant to be included in the actual book of centuries, they are for your information on how to use the book. The Book of Centuries begins with the full color cover on page 9. © 2013 Michele Quigley. For Personal Use Only. Students in the PNEU schools would begin a “Book of the Centuries” around the age of 10 and keep the book throughout their school years. A child should have a concept of time and the past before beginning his centuries book. If you wish to begin earlier, you might consider making a “family” book of centuries. Each two page spread represents 100 years of history. The left side is blank, the right side is lined and columned. (see sample pages) On the right the child will record historical events, names and dates on and on the left he will make illustrations of artifacts, tools, pottery, clothing, etc., of the time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotopic Evidence for Landscape Use and the Role of Causewayed Enclosures During the Earlier Neolithic in Southern Britain
    Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 84, 2018, pp. 185–205 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/ppr.2018.6 First published online 06 August 2018 Isotopic Evidence for Landscape use and the Role of Causewayed Enclosures During the Earlier Neolithic in Southern Britain By SAMANTHA NEIL1, JANE EVANS2, JANET MONTGOMERY3 and CHRIS SCARRE3 The nature of landscape use and residence patterns during the British earlier Neolithic has often been debated. Here we use strontium and oxygen isotope analysis of tooth enamel, from individuals buried at the Hambledon Hill causewayed enclosure monument complex in Dorset, England to evaluate patterns of landscape use during the earlier Neolithic. Previous analysis suggests that a significant proportion of the artefacts found at the site may originate from lithology of Eocene and Upper to Middle Jurassic age that the enclosures overlook to the immediate west and south. The excavators therefore argued that the sector of landscape visible from Hambledon Hill provides an approximate index for the catchment occupied by the communities that it served. Most of the burial population exhibit isotope ratios that could be consistent with this argument. Connections between Hambledon Hill and regions much further afield are also hypothesised, based on the presence of artefacts within the assemblage that could have been sourced from lithology in Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall in south-west England.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Pile Dwellings Around the Alps
    Prehistoric Pile Dwellings around the Alps World Heritage nomination Additional Information Switzerland, Austria, France, Germany, February 2011 Italy, Slovenia Table of Contents A. Answers to ICOMOS D. Revised Executive Summary A.1 Introduction Countries A.2 Key Issues State, Province or Region Name of Property B. Revised selection of component parts Geographical coordinates to the nearest second B.1 Principles Maps B.2 Criteria Proposed Statement of Outstanding B.3 Selection of component parts Universal Value B.4 Result Criteria under which the property is nominated Name and contact information of official C. Revised chapter 1 Nomination File local Institutions / Agencies 1.a Countries 1.b State, Province or Region E. Signatures 1.c Name of Property 1.d Geographical coordinates to the nearest second F. Varia 1.e Maps and plans, showing the boundaries of the nominated property and buffer zone 1.f Area of nominated property (ha) and pro- posed buffer zone (ha) Additional Information A. Answers to ICOMOS A.1 Introduction A.2 Key Issues 1. Why does the nomination Prehistoric Pile Dwellings around the Alps require a relatively high numBer of component parts to demonstrate its OUV? 2. Why is there a difference in geographical density Between the selected component parts in the diffe- rent macro-regions? 3. Does the natural setting of the site correlate with its value and level of protection and management? 4. What is the relationship between the institutional protection level, the importance of the site, and the legal effect of the protection on any given site? 5. Would it be possiBle to reduce the numBer of selected component parts? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Power and Memory in Mesoamerica's Past and Present
    Daniel Graña-Behrens (ed.) Places of Power and Memory in Mesoamerica’s Past and Present How Sites, Toponyms and Landscapes Shape History and Remembrance ESTUDIOS INDIANA 9 Places of Power and Memory in Mesoamerica’s Past and Present How Sites, Toponyms and Landscapes Shape History and Remembrance Daniel Graña-Behrens (ed.) Gebr. Mann Verlag • Berlin 2016 Estudios Indiana e monographs and essay collections in the Estudios Indiana series present the results of research on multiethnic, indigenous, and Afro-American societies and cultures in Latin America, both contemporary and historical. It publishes original contributions from all areas within the study of the Americas, including archaeology, ethnohistory, sociocultural anthropology and linguistic anthropology. e volumes are published in print form and online with free and open access. En la serie Estudios Indiana se publican monografías y compilaciones que representan los resultados de investigaciones sobre las sociedades y culturas multiétnicas, indígenas y afro-americanas de América Latina y el Caribe tanto en el presente como en el pasado. Reúne contribuciones originales de todas las áreas de los estudios americanistas, incluyendo la arqueología, la etnohistoria, la antropología socio-cultural y la antropología lingüística. Los volúmenes se publican en versión impresa y online con acceso abierto y gratuito. Editado por: Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut – Preußischer Kulturbesitz Potsdamer Straße 37 D-10785 Berlin, Alemania e-mail: [email protected] http://www.iai.spk-berlin.de
    [Show full text]
  • Pit-Grave (Yamnaya) and Pit-Grave-Maikop Burials at Levoyegorlyksky-3, Stavropol
    THE METAL AGES AND MEDIEVAL PERIOD DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2018.46.1.086-099 S.N. Korenevskiy1 and A.A. Kalmykov2 1Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Dm. Ulyanova 19, Moscow, 117036, Russia E-mail: [email protected] 2State Unitary Enterprise “Naslediye”, Pr. K. Marksa 56, Stavropol, 355006, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Pit-Grave (Yamnaya) and Pit-Grave-Maikop Burials at Levoyegorlyksky-3, Stavropol This article describes four unusual burials (No. 4, 8, 13, and 15) displaying features of the Pit-Grave rite under mound 1 at Levoyegorlyksky-3 on the Stavropol Territory, dating to the mid 4th millennium BC. The mound was constructed to mark the main burial (No. 15), which predates the others. While the preservation of the skeletons is poor, the position of the deceased was determined as fl exed supine. The mound was encircled by a stone curb (cromlech). Inside the mound and the cromlech, fragments of Early Maikop vessels were found. The main burial, however, contained pottery typical of the steppe Chalcolithic cultures, not tied with the Maikop-Novosvobodnaya community. In the intrusive burial 4, a Maikop-type dagger, a stone beak-shaped hammer, a gold pendant, and a fl int fl ake were found. The dagger has Early Maikop-Novosvobodnaya parallels, whereas the hammer is similar to Late Maikop (Dolinskoye) ones, found on the central piedmont of the northern Caucasus. This burial represents a striking example of the infl uence of the funerary tradition of the Maikop military elite on the Pit-Grave rite. On the other hand, it suggests that the Dolinskoye- type stone beak-shaped hammers may indicate the infl uence of the Pit-Grave culture at the early stage of the Maikop- Novosvobodnaya community.
    [Show full text]