The Paleoecology of a Late Ordovician Shale Unit from Southwest Ohio and Southeastern Indiana Author(S): Robert C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Paleoecology of a Late Ordovician Shale Unit from Southwest Ohio and Southeastern Indiana Author(S): Robert C Paleontological Society The Paleoecology of a Late Ordovician Shale Unit from Southwest Ohio and Southeastern Indiana Author(s): Robert C. Frey Source: Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 61, No. 2 (Mar., 1987), pp. 242-267 Published by: Paleontological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1305320 Accessed: 14/03/2010 21:30 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=sepm and http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=paleo. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Paleontological Society and SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Paleontology. http://www.jstor.org JOURNALOF PALEONTOLOGY,V. 61, NO. 2, P. 242-267, 7 FIGS.,MARCH 1987 THE PALEOECOLOGY OF A LATE ORDOVICIAN SHALE UNIT FROM SOUTHWEST OHIO AND SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA ROBERTC. FREY Department of Geography and Geology, Centenary College, Shreveport,Louisiana 71134-0188 ABSTRACT- The Treptocerasduseri shale unit withinthe WaynesvilleFormation of LateOrdovician (early Richmondian)age in southwestOhio and the equivalentTrilobite shale unit in the same formationexposed in adjacentportions of Indianarepresent an Ordovicianshallow marinemud- bottom epeiricsea facies. These fine-grainedclastics contain a moderatelydiverse mollusk-trilobite assemblagedominated by vagrantepifaunal detritus-feeding calymenid and asaphidtrilobites, large endobyssateand infaunalfilter-feeding pelecypods, and nektonicnautiloids. Articulate brachiopods, ectoprocts,and pelmatozoanechinoderms form only minor elements of this fauna. This mollusk-trilobiteassemblage was common in Late Ordovicianshallow marineclastic en- vironmentswhere mobility was an asset and therewas an abundanceof oxygenand food resources. Such assemblagesare characteristicof the LorraineFauna of Late Ordovician(Edenian to Rich- mondian)age that occurs from the Ohio Valley north and east into New York, Ontario,Quebec, and Ireland.These early Paleozoic mud-bottom assemblageswere considerablymodified by the Late Ordovicianextinction event and were replacedin the Silurianand Devonian by distinctly differentassemblages dominated by largeepifaunal strophomenid and spiriferidbrachiopods, cri- noids, and phacopidtrilobites. INTRODUCTION from mollusks in these Ordovician marine PALEOZOICsubtidal mud-bottom environ- environments. ments have been describedas supportingas- Shale units in the CincinnatianSeries (Up- semblages dominated by relatively immo- per Ordovician)in the Ohio Valley make up bile, epifaunal suspension-feeding benthos at least 60% of the exposed Ordovician sec- (Ausich and Bottjer, 1982; Jablonski and tion. Very little has been published concern- Bottjer, 1983; Thayer, 1983) or, less-com- ing the biota of these shales and their paleo- monly, mobile infaunaldeposit-feeders (Lev- ecology. Many of the shales represent the inton and Bambach, 1975). Sepkoski and deposits of muddy epeiric sea floors that sup- Sheehan(1983), citing primarilythe work of ported moderately diverse assemblages dom- Bretsky (1969, 1970a, 1970b), have de- inated not by articulate brachiopods, but by scribedUpper Ordovicianshelf communities filter-feeding pelecypods, trilobites, nauti- in easternNorth Americaas being dominated loids, and, occasionally, echinoderms. The by a diverse assemblage of orthid, stropho- Treptoceras duseri shale unit in the Waynes- menid, and atrypidbrachiopods, trepostome ville Formation is one such unit. and cryptostome ectoprocts, phacopine tri- lobites, and crinoids.Most of this assemblage STRATIGRAPHY persists beyond the Ordovician to constitute The Treptoceras duseri shale unit is a blue the brachiopod-ectoproct-pelmatozoanechi- claystone unit about 1.5 m thick located with- noderm assemblage so characteristic of Pa- in the Waynesville Formation of Late Or- leozoic shelf environments.These authorslist dovician (early Richmondian) age exposed in pelecypods as part of their "Modem Fauna" southwest Ohio and adjacent portions of and indicate that members of this group were southeastern Indiana (Figure 1). Shideler locally important in the Late Ordovician in (unpublished notes) and Flower (1946) both nearshore, inner shelf environments, spa- noted that the Treptoceras duseri shale, as tially distinct from the brachiopod-dominat- typified by the occurrenceof large numbers ed "Paleozoic Fauna" of offshore shelf en- of the nautiloid Treptoceras duseri (Hall and vironments. Trilobites, an important Whitfield),is restrictedto portions of Warren component of this offshorePaleozoic Fauna, and Clinton counties in Ohio. Studies by the are inferredto have been spatiallysegregated writer have confirmed this distribution. Copyright@ 1987, The PaleontologicalSociety 242 0022-3360/87/0061-0242$03.00 ORDOVICIAN PALEOECOLOGY 243 However, a temporally-equivalent shale unit, lithologically identical to the Treptoceras du- mo seri shale but minus the distinctive nautiloid INDIANA OHIO fauna, has been found in Butler and Preble . * counties in western Ohio and in adjacent por- 5A&4 A tions of southeastern Indiana. This shale will 2 3. be differentiated from the Treptoceras duseri shale and is referred to as the Trilobite shale 6A unit from the abundance of the calymenid trilobite, Flexicalymene meeki (Foerste). The Treptoceras duseri shale unit is located 11-13 m above the contact between the un- derlying rubbly limestones of the Arnheim KENTUCKY Formation and the even-bedded shales and thin limestones of the Waynesville Forma- tion (Figure 2). At most localities in Warren A* TREPTOCERASDUSERI SHALE OUTCROPS SCALE TRILOBITESHALE OUTCROPS I": 2Omi. and Clinton counties in Ohio, the basal con- f ORDOVICIAN-SILURIANBOUNDARY DAI tact of the Treptoceras duseri shale is well- defined, with the massive claystone of the FIGURE1 -Map of the Indiana-Ohioarea showing shale resting on a ripple-marked, irregularly the location of the exposuresof the Treptoceras bedded packstone composed of jumbled, duseriand Trilobiteshale units thatwere studied whole, disarticulated brachiopod valves. The and collectedas partof this investigation.Num- upper contact of the shale unit is gradational beredlocalities correspondto localities listed in with the occurrence of the localityregister. These localities include those in most places, limy where these shale units are more in the 10 cm of the extensively lenses increasing upper exposed and those exposures more intensively shale. However, at most localities the shale studied. is capped by a well-bedded, 10 cm thick pack- stone composed almost entirely of the dis- articulated valves of the entelacean brachio- The monotonous massive claystone li- pod Onniella meeki (Miller) in a matrix of thology that makes up much of the Treptoc- clay and sparry calcite. eras duseri shale unit is interrupted locally by The predominant lithology of the Treptoc- the development of shelly beds less than 1 eras duseri shale is best termed a claystone, cm thick and by thin limestone beds from 1- using the terminology of Potter et al. (1980). 6 cm thick (Figure 3, column 1). The shelly These massive claystones, when fresh, are beds consist of calcareous indurated clays with blue-gray, hard, dense, and well-indurated. concentrations of pelecypod and nautiloid They show no evidence of bedding, with the shells and trilobite carapaces and exuviae. rock splitting conchoidally when struck with These shelly beds are usually not continuous a hammer. These rocks are remarkably uni- and rarely traceable for more than 100 m in form in texture, fine-grained, with this mo- any direction. The thin limestone beds con- notonous lithology relieved only by occa- sist of well-bedded packstones with sharp sional layers of shells and thin limestone beds basal contacts with the underlying claystones. (Figure 3). The claystones are predominantly These limestones are composed of poorly- clay in composition (illite, 70-80%) with mi- sorted biogenic allochems ranging from fine nor amounts of silt (20-24%) and carbonate shell detritus to whole, unbroken shells in a (less than 8%). The carbonate content of the matrix of clay, micrite, and sparry calcite. claystone increases adjacent to the localized The basal portions of the limestone beds are accumulations of shell debris. Biogenic struc- commonly a jumbled mass of large, random- tures are uncommon in the massive claystone ly-oriented shells. These limestones exhibit lithology, being represented by branching graded bedding, fining upwards with shells tube-like structures referable to the ichno- becoming aligned parallel to bedding
Recommended publications
  • Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Families J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A COMPENDIUM OF FOSSIL MARINE FAMILIES J. JOHN SEPKOSKI, JR. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago REVIEWERS FOR THIS PUBLICATION: Robert Gernant, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee David M. Raup, Field Museum of Natural History Frederick R. Schram, San Diego Natural History Museum Peter M. Sheehan, Milwaukee Public Museum ISBN 0-893260-081-9 Milwaukee Public Museum Press Published by the Order of the Board of Trustees CONTENTS Abstract ---- ---------- -- - ----------------------- 2 Introduction -- --- -- ------ - - - ------- - ----------- - - - 2 Compendium ----------------------------- -- ------ 6 Protozoa ----- - ------- - - - -- -- - -------- - ------ - 6 Porifera------------- --- ---------------------- 9 Archaeocyatha -- - ------ - ------ - - -- ---------- - - - - 14 Coelenterata -- - -- --- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- 17 Platyhelminthes - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - - - 24 Rhynchocoela - ---- - - - - ---- --- ---- - - ----------- - 24 Priapulida ------ ---- - - - - -- - - -- - ------ - -- ------ 24 Nematoda - -- - --- --- -- - -- --- - -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 24 Mollusca ------------- --- --------------- ------ 24 Sipunculida ---------- --- ------------ ---- -- --- - 46 Echiurida ------ - --- - - - - - --- --- - -- --- - -- - - ---
    [Show full text]
  • The Carboniferous Evolution of Nova Scotia
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 The Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia J. H. CALDER Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 698, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2T9 Abstract: Nova Scotia during the Carboniferous lay at the heart of palaeoequatorial Euramerica in a broadly intermontane palaeoequatorial setting, the Maritimes-West-European province; to the west rose the orographic barrier imposed by the Appalachian Mountains, and to the south and east the Mauritanide-Hercynide belt. The geological affinity of Nova Scotia to Europe, reflected in elements of the Carboniferous flora and fauna, was mirrored in the evolution of geological thought even before the epochal visits of Sir Charles Lyell. The Maritimes Basin of eastern Canada, born of the Acadian-Caledonian orogeny that witnessed the suture of Iapetus in the Devonian, and shaped thereafter by the inexorable closing of Gondwana and Laurasia, comprises a near complete stratal sequence as great as 12 km thick which spans the Middle Devonian to the Lower Permian. Across the southern Maritimes Basin, in northern Nova Scotia, deep depocentres developed en echelon adjacent to a transform platelet boundary between terranes of Avalon and Gondwanan affinity. The subsequent history of the basins can be summarized as distension and rifting attended by bimodal volcanism waning through the Dinantian, with marked transpression in the Namurian and subsequent persistence of transcurrent movement linking Variscan deformation with Mauritainide-Appalachian convergence and Alleghenian thrusting. This Mid- Carboniferous event is pivotal in the Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia. Rapid subsidence adjacent to transcurrent faults in the early Westphalian was succeeded by thermal sag in the later Westphalian and ultimately by basin inversion and unroofing after the early Permian as equatorial Pangaea finally assembled and subsequently rifted again in the Triassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Holochoanites Are Endoceroids Rousseau H
    HOLOCHOANITES ARE ENDOCEROIDS ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER, New York State Museum Albany 1, N. Y. INTRODUCTION The Holochoanites may be defined as those cephalopods in which the septal necks are so elongated that they extend from the septum of which they are a part and a prolongation, apicad to the next septum, or even farther. Hyatt (1884) first regarded the Holochoanoidea as one of two major divisions of the Nautiloidea. Later (1900) he replaced his other division, the Ellipochoanoidea, by four divisions the Orthochaonites, Cyrtochoanites, Schistochoanites and Mixochoanites, and changed the name Holochoanoidea to Holochoanites for uniformity. In the mean- time, further study caused him to modify the contents of the holochoanitic division materially. Some genera originally placed in this group, such as Trocholites, proved upon further study to possess ellipochoanitic septal necks. The genus Aturia, while properly holochoanitic, was removed, because it was recognized that it represented a development of elongated septal necks in Tertiary time, which was obviously quite unrelated to that of other holochoanitic cephalopods, few of which survived the close of the Ordovician. Miller and Thompson (1937) showed that the elongation of the septal necks in Aturia was a secondary feature and the ellipochoanitic ancestry was indicated by the retention of connecting rings. It was believed that the Holochaonites proper contain cephalopods in which the long necks were primitive, and no connecting rings were developed. Unfortunately Hyatt does not seem to have committed himself on his ideas concerning the relationship of the Holochoanites with other cephalopods. It is not clear whether this was because of his preoccupation with the phyletic sig- nificance of early stages and the controversy that developed about the origin of the Ammonoidea and their relationship to the Nautiloidea, or whether he was as much perplexed by the problem as have been those of us who have come after him in the study of cephalopods.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Giants (Other Than Dinosaurs) Level Y Leveled Book Correlation Written by Alfred J
    Prehistoric Giants LEVELED BOOK • Y (Other Than Dinosaurs) A Reading A–Z Level Y Leveled Book Prehistoric Giants Word Count: 2,161 (Other Than Dinosaurs) Written by Alfred J. Smuskiewicz Visit www.readinga-z.com www.readinga-z.com for thousands of books and materials. Photo Credits: Front cover, pages 9, 13, 16, 17: © DEA PICTURE LIBRARY/age fotostock; back cover: © Dean Mitchell/Alamy; title page: © Dirk Wiersma/SPL/Photo Researchers, Inc.; page 3: © John Reader/SPL/Photo Researchers, Inc.; page 6: © DK Images; page 8: Jon Hughes/Bedrock Studios © Dorling Kindersley; Prehistoric Giants page 11: © Sheila Terry/SPL/Photo Researchers, Inc.; page 12 (left): © Richard Ellis/SPL/Photo Researchers, Inc.; pages 12 (right), 15, 22 (left): © Hemera Technologies/Jupiterimages Corporation; page 14: © Chris Butler/SPL/Photo Researchers, Inc.; page 18: © Roger Harris/SPL/Photo Researchers, Inc.; (Other Than Dinosaurs) page 19: © Jupiterimages Corporation; page 20: Mick Loates © Dorling Kindersley; page 21: © Photo Researchers, Inc.; page 22 (right): © iStockphoto.com/Yael Miller Front cover: Gastornis attacks prey. Back cover: Emu feet look as if they might belong to a prehistoric animal like Gastornis. Title page: fossils of marine life from between 470 million and 360 million years ago Table of Contents: Georges Cuvier (portrait, top left) defined the ways scientists decide how an extinct animal, such as Megatherium (top), might look. Geologist William Buckland (foreground, left) found a tiny mammal’s jaw bone (under magnifying glass) with a dinosaur’s toe bone, which led him and Cuvier to decide that mammals had lived in more ancient times than anyone had ever known.
    [Show full text]
  • 1540 Evans.Vp
    An early Silurian (Aeronian) cephalopod fauna from Kopet-Dagh, north-eastern Iran: including the earliest records of non-orthocerid cephalopods from the Silurian of Northern Gondwana DAVID H. EVANS, MANSOUREH GHOBADI POUR, LEONID E. POPOV & HADI JAHANGIR The cephalopod fauna from the Aeronian Qarebil Limestone of north-eastern Iran comprises the first comprehensive re- cord of early Silurian cephalopods from peri-Gondwana. Although consisting of relatively few taxa, the assemblage in- cludes members of the orders Oncocerida, Discosorida, Barrandeocerida and Orthocerida. Coeval records of several of these taxa are from low palaeolatitude locations that include Laurentia, Siberia, Baltica and Avalonia, and are otherwise unknown from peri-Gondwana until later in the Silurian. The cephalopod assemblage occurs in cephalopod limestones that currently represent the oldest record of such limestones in the Silurian of the peri-Gondwana margin. The appear- ance of these cephalopods, together with the development of cephalopod limestones may be attributed to the relatively low latitudinal position of central Iran and Kopet-Dagh compared with that of the west Mediterranean sector during the Aeronian. This, combined with the continued post-glacial warming after the Hirnantian glaciation, facilitated the initia- tion of carbonate deposition and conditions suitable for the development of the cephalopod limestones whilst permitting the migration of cephalopod taxa, many of which were previously restricted to lower latitudes. • Key words: Llandovery, Aeronian, Cephalopoda, palaebiogeography, peri-Gondwana. EVANS, D.H., GHOBADI POUR, M., POPOV,L.E.&JAHANGIR, H. 2015. An Early Silurian (Aeronian) cephalopod fauna from Kopet-Dagh, north-eastern Iran: including the earliest records of non-orthocerid cephalopods from the Silurian of Northern Gondwana.
    [Show full text]
  • App24-275.Pdf
    ACT A PAL A EON T 0 LOG ICA POLONICA Vol. 24 1979 No.2 WANDA JESIONEK-SZYMANSKA MORPHOLOGY AND MICROSTRUCTURE OF OLIGOLAMELLAR TEETH IN PALEOZOIC ECHINOIDS PART 1. TEETH OF SOME EARLY LEPIDOCENTRID ECHINOIDS JESIONEK-SZYMANSKA, W. 1979. Morphology and microstructure of oligolamellar teeth in Paleozoic echinoids. Part 1. Teeth of some early lepidocentrid echinoids. Acta Palaeont. Polonica, 24, 2, 275-293, June 1979. The ollgolamellar, flat type of echinoid teeth in Kongtetechtnus magnitubercu­ tatus gen.n., sp.n. Is described. The teeth consist of few relatively large, thtck, roughly triangular lamellae. He-interpretation of the teeth structure of the oldest known echlnolds - Upper Ordovician Autechtnus and Ecttnechtnus Is pre­ sented. It is suggested that their teeth also belong to the flat, ollgolamellar type and have been hitherto wrongly assigned to the grooved type. A new lepidocentrid Kongtetechtnus magnttubercutatus gen.n., sp.n. from the Givetian (Middle Devo­ nian) of Poland Is described on the basis of isolated coronal plates, spines and Aristotle lantern elements. Key w 0 r d s: Devonian, echinoids, evolution, jaw apparatus, micro­ structure, taxonomy. Wanda Jesionek-Szymanska, Zaklad Paleobiologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, At 2wirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland. Received: De­ cember 1978. INTRODUCTION In spite of the great importance of the echinoid teeth morphology in the classification of echinoids, the role of fossil material in this matter has been until now insignificant. This is particularly true of the Paleozoic echinoids which generally are assigned to the "grooved" type. The "serrate" type of teeth has also been reported from the Late Paleozoic deposits (Jackson 1912, Bindemann 1938) but without entering into details and interpretation of this structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Morphological Events in the Evolution of Paleozoic Cephalopods I
    Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1994, pp. 49 - 55. Translated from Stratigrafiya. Geologicheskaya Korrelyatsiya, Vol. 2, No. 1,1994, pp. 55 - 61. Original Russian Text Copyright © 1994 by Barskov, Bogoslovskaya, Zhuravleva, Kiselev, Kuzina, Leonova, Shimanskii, Yatskov. English Translation Copyright © 1994 by Interperiodica Publishing (Russia). Main Morphological Events in the Evolution of Paleozoic Cephalopods I. S. Barskov*, M. F. Bogoslovskaya*, F. A. Zhuravleva*, G. N. Kiselev**, L. F. Kuzina*, T. B. Leonova*, V. N. Shimanskii*, and S. V. Yatskov* institute of Paleontology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow, 117647 Russia **Department of Paleontology, St. Petersburg State University, 16-ya Liniya 29, St. Petersburg, 199178 Russia Received January 26,1993 Abstract - New morphological features in shell structure, which were the starting points of cephalopod diver­ sification into taxa of high ranks (subclasses, orders, superfamilies), are considered as phylogenetic events. Main morphological innovations in the evolution of nautiloid cephalopods; the formation of endosiphuncular and cameral deposits, shell coiling, truncation of the phragmocone’s apical end, and contracted aperture, which originated to make the relative shell positioning in the water more efficient. Changes in the lobe line structure and various types of complications in the primary lobes (ventral, umbonal, and lateral) were the most important morphological innovations in convolute ammonoids. The functional significance of these changes remains unclear, but recognition of equally significant changes in primary lobes requires a review of the Paleozoic Ammonoidea taxonomy at the suborder level. This paper is a continuation of a study whose first lation of the buoyancy process and to support in various results have been published (Barskov et al., 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Ascocerid Cephalopods from the Hirnantian?–Llandovery Stages of the Southern Paraná Basin (Paraguay, South America): first Record from High Paleolatitudes
    Journal of Paleontology, page 1 of 11 Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/18/0088-0906 doi: 10.1017/jpa.2018.59 Ascocerid cephalopods from the Hirnantian?–Llandovery stages of the southern Paraná Basin (Paraguay, South America): first record from high paleolatitudes M. Cichowolski,1,2 N.J. Uriz,3 M.B. Alfaro,3 and J.C. Galeano Inchausti4 1Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Área de Paleontología, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab. 2, C1428EGA, Buenos Aires, Argentina 〈[email protected]〉 2CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Estudios Andinos “Don Pablo Groeber” (IDEAN), Buenos Aires, Argentina 3División Geología del Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina. 〈[email protected]〉, 〈[email protected]〉 4Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Comunicaciones de Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay 〈[email protected]〉 Abstract.—Ascocerid cephalopods are described for the first time from high paleolatitudes of Gondwana. Studied material was collected from the Hirnantian?–Llandovery strata of the Eusebio Ayala and Vargas Peña formations, Paraná Basin, southeastern Paraguay. The specimens are poorly preserved and were questionably assigned to the sub- family Probillingsitinae Flower, 1941, being undetermined at genus and species rank because diagnostic characters are not visible. A particular feature seen in our material is the presence of both parts of the ascocerid conch (the juve- nile or cyrtocone and the mature or brevicone) joined together, which is a very rare condition in the known paleonto- logical record. The specimens are interpreted as at a subadult stage of development because fully grown ascocerids would have lost the juvenile shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalopod Reproductive Strategies Derived from Embryonic Shell Size
    Biol. Rev. (2017), pp. 000–000. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12341 Cephalopod embryonic shells as a tool to reconstruct reproductive strategies in extinct taxa Vladimir Laptikhovsky1,∗, Svetlana Nikolaeva2,3,4 and Mikhail Rogov5 1Fisheries Division, Cefas, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, U.K. 2Department of Earth Sciences Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, U.K. 3Laboratory of Molluscs Borissiak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 117997, Russia 4Laboratory of Stratigraphy of Oil and Gas Bearing Reservoirs Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420000, Russia 5Department of Stratigraphy Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119017, Russia ABSTRACT An exhaustive study of existing data on the relationship between egg size and maximum size of embryonic shells in 42 species of extant cephalopods demonstrated that these values are approximately equal regardless of taxonomy and shell morphology. Egg size is also approximately equal to mantle length of hatchlings in 45 cephalopod species with rudimentary shells. Paired data on the size of the initial chamber versus embryonic shell in 235 species of Ammonoidea, 46 Bactritida, 13 Nautilida, 22 Orthocerida, 8 Tarphycerida, 4 Oncocerida, 1 Belemnoidea, 4 Sepiida and 1 Spirulida demonstrated that, although there is a positive relationship between these parameters in some taxa, initial chamber size cannot be used to predict egg size in extinct cephalopods; the size of the embryonic shell may be more appropriate for this task. The evolution of reproductive strategies in cephalopods in the geological past was marked by an increasing significance of small-egged taxa, as is also seen in simultaneously evolving fish taxa. Key words: embryonic shell, initial chamber, hatchling, egg size, Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea, reproductive strategy, Nautilida, Coleoidea.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups
    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
    [Show full text]
  • Sepkoski, J.J. 1992. Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology Rodney Watkins, Editor (Reviewer for this paper was P.M. Sheehan) This publication is priced at $25.00 and may be obtained by writing to the Museum Gift Shop, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Orders must also include $3.00 for shipping and handling ($4.00 for foreign destinations) and must be accompanied by money order or check drawn on U.S. bank. Money orders or checks should be made payable to the Milwaukee Public Museum. Wisconsin residents please add 5% sales tax. In addition, a diskette in ASCII format (DOS) containing the data in this publication is priced at $25.00. Diskettes should be ordered from the Geology Section, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Specify 3Y. inch or 5Y. inch diskette size when ordering. Checks or money orders for diskettes should be made payable to "GeologySection, Milwaukee Public Museum," and fees for shipping and handling included as stated above. Profits support the research effort of the GeologySection. ISBN 0-89326-168-8 ©1992Milwaukee Public Museum Sponsored by Milwaukee County Contents Abstract ....... 1 Introduction.. ... 2 Stratigraphic codes. 8 The Compendium 14 Actinopoda.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park
    Chapter 5. Paleozoic Invertebrate Paleontology of Grand Canyon National Park By Linda Sue Lassiter1, Justin S. Tweet2, Frederick A. Sundberg3, John R. Foster4, and P. J. Bergman5 1Northern Arizona University Department of Biological Sciences Flagstaff, Arizona 2National Park Service 9149 79th Street S. Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 3Museum of Northern Arizona Research Associate Flagstaff, Arizona 4Utah Field House of Natural History State Park Museum Vernal, Utah 5Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona Introduction As impressive as the Grand Canyon is to any observer from the rim, the river, or even from space, these cliffs and slopes are much more than an array of colors above the serpentine majesty of the Colorado River. The erosive forces of the Colorado River and feeder streams took millions of years to carve more than 290 million years of Paleozoic Era rocks. These exposures of Paleozoic Era sediments constitute 85% of the almost 5,000 km2 (1,903 mi2) of the Grand Canyon National Park (GRCA) and reveal important chronologic information on marine paleoecologies of the past. This expanse of both spatial and temporal coverage is unrivaled anywhere else on our planet. While many visitors stand on the rim and peer down into the abyss of the carved canyon depths, few realize that they are also staring at the history of life from almost 520 million years ago (Ma) where the Paleozoic rocks cover the great unconformity (Karlstrom et al. 2018) to 270 Ma at the top (Sorauf and Billingsley 1991). The Paleozoic rocks visible from the South Rim Visitors Center, are mostly from marine and some fluvial sediment deposits (Figure 5-1).
    [Show full text]