Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

Maternal grandmothers with advanced age reproduction are more likely to have Down syndrome grandchildren

Suttur S Malini1, Mysore R Savitha2, Nallur B Ramachandra1

1Human Genetics Laboratory, Department of Studies in Zoology, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore, Karnataka, India. 2Department of Pediatrics, Cheluvamba Hospital, Mysore Medical College, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

* Corresponding Author: [email protected] (S.S.Malini)

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS), trisomy 21, is the most common chromosomal syndrome that affects one in 600- 800 live births. The advanced maternal age is the only well known risk factor to cause DS. Our study revealed that many young mothers produced DS children than advanced age mothers in India. A total of 150 suspected DS cases were investigated cytogenetically. Randomly selected 200 healthy families in South India were used as controls. Logistic regression was performed on case-control dataset which was generated by randomly selecting the child from each of the control families. Pedigree analyses indicated that the maternal grandmothers had advanced age during conception of their daughters who gave birth to DS child. Case-control status was used as dependent variable, whereas parental and grandparental age was used as covariates. Logistic regression was reported as odds ratios, univariate and multivariate. The age of maternal grandmother showed highly significant difference in odds ratio, indicating that the advanced age of maternal grandmother was the possible risk factor. Therefore, it is important to sort-out the effect of advanced age mothers vs grandmothers on increased frequency of DS reported in different populations.

Key words: Maternal grandmother; advanced age; Down syndrome

INTRODUCTION was undertaken in view of the controversial Down syndrome (DS) is the most common reports of the involvement of age of grandmothers genetic disorder affecting one in 600-800 live (20, 21) or not (22, 23) in causing the DS. Here births irrespective of gender, ethnic origin or we report the increased frequency of DS in India racial group (1, 2). It is associated with mental is due to advanced maternal grandmother age and retardation, immune system disorders, it is also possible that higher incidence of DS in autoimmune problems, congenital heart diseases, other western countries could be due to both premature aging and Alzheimer disease between advanced age of mother and maternal the age of 30-40 years (3, 4). Though vast amount grandmother. of work has been done on DS since 1959 on the etiological and demographic factors, the advanced MATERIALS AND METHODS maternal age is the only well known risk factor for A total of 150 suspected DS cases were DS (5-10). Studies on DS by Talukder and investigated cytogenetically. An informed consent Sharma (11) in Indian population affecting one in was obtained from the parents before including 1139 live births has not provided convincing data them in the study. Ethical clearance was obtained to support the hypothesis that advanced maternal by the institutional ethical clearance committee of age is indeed the risk factor in the occurrence of the University of Mysore. Randomly selected 200 DS (12-19). Despite the clinical importance of age healthy families in South India without any dependent in human, the other incidence of DS or any other genetic disorders mechanisms are yet to be identified. Present study were used as controls irrespective of caste, sub

8

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

caste, religion, region both from urban and rural RESULTS areas. A genetic register was designed and used to collect the complete information about family For the present study, the age of parents and history, medical history, presence or absence of grandparents were classified into different age consanguinity in the family and parental diseases groups, 18-24, 25-29, 30-35, 36-40, and 41+ among parents both in control and affected years. Of the 150 DS cases studied, 147 were families. found to be trisomy 21 with extra free 21st Chromosomal analysis of the patient was carried , two cases were mosaic and one was out on peripheral blood leucocyte culture by using with translocation. Mothers of both control and the standard protocol of Seabright (24) with slight DS families produced more children in their modifications. G banded metaphase plates were young age than in their advanced age (Fig.1). In analyzed by automated LEICA KARYO software controls, young age maternal grandmothers and karyotyped according to the International produced high number of normal grandchildren, System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature while advanced age maternal grandmothers (2005). produced high number of DS grandchildren (Fig. Case-control dataset was generated by randomly 2). selecting the child from each of the control Mean maternal age of control and DS was 22.30 families. Case-control groups were generally of and 25.57 years while mean paternal age of the same ethnic and socio-economic backgrounds. control and DS was 22.30 and 25.57 years Logistic regression was performed using the respectively. A representative pedigree of DS software, SPSS version 10.0 to record the effect of family of young mothers (Fig. 3) also shows that the variables. Case-control status was used as her mother’s age was advanced at the time of her dependent variable, and parental as well as conception. On the other hand, the highest grandparental age as covariates. Results were numbers of children were produced by the fathers reported as odds ratio from model with one and maternal grandfathers in their advanced age in variable at a time as well as a model with both control and DS families. multivariables.

Table 1: Logistic regression analysis of parental and maternal grandparental age of control and Down syndrome families in Mysore population (c.i. = confidence intervals). *= significant

Univariate Multiple

Odds ratio Odds ratio Variables p value p value (95% c.i.) (95% c.i.) 1.163 0.984 Mother (1.105;1.223) (0.841;1.151) (per year) 0.001* 0.838

Father 1.163 1.198 (per year) (1.108;1.221) 0.001* (1.017;1.412) 0.031*

Maternal 1.762 1.854 grandmother (1.569;1.98) 0.001* (1.554;2.221) 0.001* (per year)

9

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

Maternal 1.568 0.946 grandfather (1.434;1.715) 0.001* (0.814;1.099) 0.468 (per year)

Fig.1. Age distribution of mothers in control and Down syndrome families (C= Control, DS= Down syndrome)

Logistic regression analysis of parental and was no significant difference in odds ratio. At the maternal grandparental age of control and DS four variable levels, maternal grandmother families (Table 1) was done at all combinations to showed highly significant (85%) difference in establish specific relations of grandmother's age odds ratio, indicating that the maternal with other variables. The 95% confidence grandmother age was the possible risk factor. intervals for the effect of the age of mother and Similarly, at the four variable levels, advanced age of father were lower than the age of maternal paternal age was also showed 19% difference in grandfather and maternal grandmother. The odds odds ratio, indicating that the advanced paternal ratios were significant when all the four variables age was also the possible risk factor, however, it is were used one at a time. When the age of mother not effective as maternal grandmother age. and father were considered as covariates, there

10

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

Fig.2. Age distribution of maternal grandmothers in control and Down syndrome families (C= Control, DS= Down syndrome)

DISCUSSION

In India majority of the marriages are performed different parts of India shows the mean age of around 20 and 25-30 years of age for women and mother with DS children is 27.6 years in Punjab men respectively. The age difference between (18), 26.8 years in Mumbai (16, 19) and 30.2 husband and wife normally varies from 1 to10 years in Hyderabad (15, 17). Surprisingly, our years due to cultural and socio-economic status study also revealed that in many cases more DS (25, 26). Generally, in India, women plan to have children are born to young mothers. This clearly babies in the early age of their marriage. This indicates that more DS children are born to young could be the possible reason wherein the mother mothers than to mothers with advanced age in and the grandmother produced more children in India. This also brings out that the maternal age is their young age. Incidence of DS children in not responsible for nondisjunction of chromosome 21.

11

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

Fig. 3: Pedigree of Down syndrome children of young age mother. The Roman number in the left side of the figure indicates the number of generation. The Arabic number below the symbol denotes the number of individual in the generation. The number inside the symbol of grandmother represents the age when she gave birth to the mother of Down syndrome. The number inside the symbol of father and mother in the 2nd generation indicates their age when they gave birth to Down syndrome child. This is the representative pedigree out of 150 Down syndrome families.

Interestingly, we found that 78% of DS becomes an oogonium and enters into I, grandchildren were born when the maternal giving rise to the primary . At birth, meiosis grandmothers age was 30 and above years. This is I is arrested in females in the diplotene stage until not the scenario in majority of western population . A few hours before , the first studied so far. A few earlier reports suggest the meiotic block is removed. Subsequently, the influence of grandmaternal age, on the risk of oocyte blocked at meiosis II metaphase, completes their grandchild being born with DS (20, 21). Our meiosis only after penetration (27). Every careful observations of the pedigrees of DS individual develops from the mother’s egg, which children revealed that wherever the daughter was originated as a primary oocyte during the born to an aged mother the chances of that grandmother’s . Therefore, every egg daughter giving birth to DS children are high. physically and genetically links three female Logistic regression analysis using all the four generations. If diverse environmental factors covariates have shown that when they were influence the epigenetic dynamics of the oocyte in considered together, the effect of age of father and F(n-2) and F(n-1), they can cause the maternal grandmother were not diluted, genotype/phenotype changes in the F(n) cohorts. showing an increase in odds by 19% and 85% per Epigenetic maternalization continues in the F(n-1) extra year respectively. This indicates the birth of generation during maturation of growing . a female child to a mother with advanced age has Maternally inherited oocyte proteins are an increased effect for the birth of DS subjects as accumulated and used to demethylate and activate their grandchildren, while the age of the father the paternal genome after fertilization (28). seems to be of lesser importance in this context. Dramard et al ., (29) demonstrated that the natural Golubovsky and Manton (27) have explained a insertional repetitive elements (I-REs) could have three-generation approach in biodemographic a key regulatory role in the silencing of I-like studies on the developmental and the epigenetic sequences in the of ageing of Drosophila profiles of female . Each primordial germ melanogaster. These variations arising in formed in the 8-12 weeks old cells within the would be inherited and

12

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

could thus play a role in the process of adaptive western studies could be due to advanced age of evolution. It has been reported that the promoter both mother and grandmother. of SALL4 was hypermethylated in aneuploidy tumor cells, which is one of the key players that Conclusion: Apart from advanced maternal and act as care takers for chromosome stability (30). paternal age, advanced maternal grandmother age Meiosis in a woman extends over 10-50 years is also a possible risk factor in causing DS in period with the oocytes being arrested in Meiosis I young mothers. Thus, the need of the day for India during most of its lifetime (301. This contrasts and elsewhere is implementation of prenatal with , which begins at puberty screening of genetic disorders as a preventive when cells entering meiosis move from one stage public health programme on a priority basis as to the other without delay. Lamb et al. (32) immunization program on hand. proposed that altered recombination pattern along with nondisjoined chromosome, and advanced ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: maternal age effect in meiotic disturbance are the We are extremely grateful to the families who causes of nondisjunction of chromosome 21. participated in this work and to the clinicians of

Jeffery et al. (33) demonstrated that Drosophila Cheluvamba hospital, J.S.S hospital and oocytes exhibit significant age–dependent meiotic HoldsWorth memorial hospital, Mysore who nondisjunction wherein achiasmate diagnosed and referred these cases to us. Written become vulnerable to nondisjunction as consent was obtained from the patient or their Drosophila oocytes age. Maternal primordial relatives for publication of the study. We thank germ cells contain both parental genomic Chairman of our department and Prof. H. A. imprints. Transition from primordial germ cell to Ranganath, Prof. S. R. Ramesh, Dr. G. Mahesh, oocyte is accompanied by two genome Dr. N. Upendra, and our genetics research group reprogramming events: Erasure of parental for their support and help during the course of the imprints and subsequent epigenetic preparation of the manuscript. This work was maternalization starts after primordial germ cell done with the self finance without financial entry into the genital ridge and consists of rapid support from any funding agencies. genome-wide demethylation (27, 34, 35). A deficit of oocyte proteins prevents normal development. The reproductive system of the References: grandmother in her advanced age fails to make essential proteins which in turn leads to changes in 1. Down JLH. Observations on an ethnic meiosis I and meiosis II, resulting in improper classification of idiots. London Hospital Clinical meiotic segregation of chromosomes in the germ Lectures and Reports. 1866; 3: 259-262. cells of her daughter (27). With this background, 2. Dutta S, Nandagopal K, Gangopadhyay PK, we put forth the hypothesis that advanced age of Mukhopadhyay K. Molecular aspects of Down maternal grandmother is involved in bringing syndrome. Ind Paediatr. 2005; 42: 339-344. about changes in the meiosis of her daughter at 3. Pueschel SM, Anneren G, Durlach R. the time of conception. This cascade takes place Guidelines for optimal medical care of persons during the embryogenesis of the mothers of DS with Down syndrome. International League of children when she was in grandmother’s womb. Socities for Persons with Mental Handicap Therefore, DS not only depends on the age of the (ILSMH). Acta Paediat. 1995; 84: 823-827. mother but also on the age of the maternal 4. Muchova J, Sustrova M, Garaiova I, Liptakova grandmother, which results in nondisjunction of A, Blazicek P, Kvasnicka P et al. Influence of age chromosome 21. Based on this, one can surmise on activities of antioxidant enzymes and lipid that the increased frequency of Down syndrome in peroxidation products in erythrocytes and neutrophils of Down syndrome patients. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001; 31: 499-508.

13

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

5. Hassold TJ, Jacobs PA. Trisomy in man. Annu 18. Kaur A, Mahajan S, Singh JR. Cytogenetic Rev Genet. 1984; 18: 69-97. Profile of Individuals with Mental retardation. Int 6. Battaglia DE, Goodwin P, Klein NA, Soules J Hum Genet. 2003; 3(1): 13-16. MR. Influence of maternal age on meiotic spindle 19. Kava MP, Tullu MS, Muranjan MN, Girisha assembly in oocytes from naturally cycling KM. Down syndrome: clinical profile from India. women. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11: 2217-2222. Arch Med Res. 2004; 36(2): 183. 7. Volarcik K, Sheean L, Goldfarb J, Woods FW, 20. Aagesen L, Grinsted J, Mikkelsen M. Abdul-Karim, P. Hunt P. The meiotic competence Advanced grandmaternal age on the mother's side of in-vitro matured human oocytes is influenced a risk of giving rise to trisomy 21. Ann Hum by donor age:evidence that is Genet. 1984; 48: 297- 301. compromised in the reproductively aged ovary. 21. Mikkelsen M. Down anomaly: New research Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 154-160. of an old and well known syndrome. Past, Present, 8. Freeman SB, Yang Q, Allran K, Taft LF, Future. In: Berg K, ed. Medical Genetics: New Sherman SL. Women with a reduced Ovarian York: Alan R. Liss 1985. Complement may have an increased risk for a 22. Kazaura MR, Lie RT, Skjaerven RS. child with Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. Grandmother age and risk of Down’s syndrome in 2000; 66: 1680-1683. Norway. Acta Obstet act Gynec Scandinavica. 9. Hassold T, Sherman T. Downsyndrome: 2006; 85(2): 236-240. genetic recombination and the origin of the extra 23. Kovaleva NV, Tahmarebi-Hesari M, chromosome 21. Clinical Genetics. 2000; 57: 95- Verlinskaya DK. Grandmaternal ages at birth of 100. parents of children with down syndrome in St. 10. Paterson D, Costa ACS. Down syndrome Peterburg. Cytol and Genet. 2010; 44(5): 47-53. and genetics-a case of linked histories. Nature 24. Sea bright M. A rapid banding technique for Review Genetics. 2005; 6: 137-147. human chromosome. Lancet II. 1971; 971-972. 11. Talukder G, Sharma A. Genetic causes of 25. Chatterjee, M, Lambert J. Women and congenital malformation in India Int J Hum Genet. nutrition: reflections from India and Pakistan. 2006; 6(1): 15-25. Food and Nutrition Bulletin.1989; 4: 13–28. 12. Issac GS, Krishnamurthy PS, Reddy R, Ahuja 26. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. YR. Down’s syndrome in Hydrabad, India. Acta Reproductive and sexual health of young people Anthropogenet. 1985; 9(4): 256-260. in India. 2009. 13. Verma IC, Mathew S, Elango R, Shukla A. 27. Golubovsky MD, Manton KG. The three Cytogenetic studies in Down syndrome. Ind generation approach in Bio-demography is based Pediatr. 1991; 28: 991-996. on the developmental profiles and the epigenetics 14. Verma IC, Anand NK, Kabra M, Menon of female gametes. Fron Bio Sci. 2005; 10: 187- PSN, Sharma N. Study of Malformations and 191. Down syndrome in India (SOMDI): Delhi Region. 28. Surani MA. Reprogramming of genome Ind J Hum Genet. 1998; 4: 84-87. function through epigeneticinheritance. Nature. 15. Jyothy A, Kumar KS, Mallikarjuna GN, Babu 2001; 414: 122-128. Rao V, Swarna M, Uma DB, et al. Cytogenetic 29. Dramard X, Heidmann T, Jensen S. Natural studies of 1001 Down syndrome cases from Andra Epigenetic Protection against the I-factor, a Pradesh India. Ind J Med Res. 2000; 111: 133-7. Drosophila LINE Retrotransposon, by Remnants 16. Seema K, Babu Rao V, Kerketta L, Ghosh K, of Ancestral Invasions. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2(3); Mohanty D. Parental origin of Extra chromosome e304. in children with Down syndrome (abs.). XXVII 30. Habano W, Sugai T, JiaoYF, S.I. Nakamura. Annual Conference of the ISHG. Thiruvanantha- Novel approach for detecting global epigenetic puram 200; 93. alterations associated with tumor cell aneuploidy. 17. Jyothy A, Kumar KS, Mallikarjuna GN, Babu Int J of Cancer. 2007; 121(7): 487- 493. Rao, V, Uma DB, Sujatha M, et al. Parental age 31. Lamb NE, Sherman SL, Hassold TJ. Effect and the origin of extra chromosome 21 in Down of meiotic recombination on the production of syndrome. J Hum Genet. 2001; 46: 347-350. 14

Journal of Paramedical Sciences (JPS) Summer 2011 Vol.2, No.3 ISSN 2008-4978

aneuploidy in human. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 111: 250-255.

32. Lamb NE, Feingold E, Savage A, Avramopoulos D, Freeman S, Gu Y, et al. Characterization of susceptible chiasma configurations that increase the risk for maternal nondisjunction of chromosome 21. Hum Mol Genet. 1997; 6: 1391-1399. 33. Jeffreys, Charlotte A, Burrage, Peter S, Bickel, Sharon E. A model system for increased meiotic nondisjunction in older oocytes. Current Biol. 2003; 13: 498- 503. 34. Reik W, Dean W, Walter J. 2001 Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Science. 2001; 293 (5532): 1089-1093. 35. Kierszenbaum AL. Genomic imprinting and epigenetic reprogramming: unearthing the garden of forking paths. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002; 63:

15