Dáil Éireann

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dáil Éireann Vol. 766 Wednesday, No. 2 23 May 2012 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Dé Céadaoin, 23 Bealtaine 2012. Leaders’ Questions An Taoiseach ……………………………… 385 Order of Business ……………………………… 396 Tribunal of Inquiry: Motion …………………………… 401 Topical Issue Matters ……………………………… 403 Road Safety Authority (Commercial Vehicle Roadworthiness) Bill 2012 [Seanad]: Order for Report Stage …………………………… 404 Report and Final Stages …………………………… 405 Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Bill 2011 [Seanad]: Second Stage (resumed) 407 Ceisteanna — Questions Minister for Finance Priority Questions …………………………… 423 Other Questions …………………………… 432 Estimates for Public Services 2012: Messages from Select Committees …………… 444 Topical Issue Debate Services for People with Disabilities ……………………… 444 Tax Collection ……………………………… 448 Northern Ireland Issues …………………………… 451 Schools Building Projects …………………………… 454 Qualifications and Quality Assurance (Education and Training) Bill 2011 [Seanad]: Second Stage (resumed)……………………………457 Referral to Select Committee ………………………… 477 Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2012: Order for Second Stage …………………………… 477 Second Stage ……………………………… 477 Estimates for Public Services 2012: Message from Select Committee …………… 491 Private Members’ Business National Monuments: Motion (resumed)………………………491 Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2012: Second Stage (resumed)…………513 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 523 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Céadaoin, 23 Bealtaine 2012. Wednesday, 23 May 2012. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Leaders’ Questions Deputy Micheál Martin: The Taoiseach will attend the informal summit of leaders from across Europe later today, at which it is imperative radical action is taken to restore confidence and growth across Europe. The situation today is graver than it has been at any time during the past three years. There is no more room for manoeuvre and delay. It is essential that Europe takes critical steps on three basic issues, namely, the sovereign debt crisis, which must be tackled by the establishment of a more secure and larger facility for the purchase of Govern- ment bonds; the financial crisis, by ensuring that banks are capitalised to a level which ensures their long term survival is unquestioned across Europe, including dealing with Irish bank and mortgage debt; and, the jobs crisis, by utilising the eurozone’s enormous resources to deliver immediate job creating investment. Minimalist approaches are no longer acceptable. People in Ireland should and must vote “Yes” in the upcoming referendum because this will give us the most secure and cheapest access to the funding we need to retain public services and pay pensions in the years ahead. Europe is on a precipice and we must do nothing here to push it over the edge. It is in that context that I believe we should take the debate to the people. Political leaders should be willing to engage in a national debate with those advocating a “Yes” vote and those advocating a “No” vote. Many voters remain undecided. Some polls suggest up to 30% of people are undecided. I believe a leaders’ debate should be facilitated. We live in a democracy. I understand that invitations for such a debate have issued from RTE, the public service broad- caster which has a particular responsibility in this regard. TV3 attempted to organise a leaders’ debate but leaders, with the exception of Deputy Joe Higgins and I, declined to participate. People expect leaders to engage. Will the Taoiseach confirm if, as indicated by a spokesperson yesterday, he has been invited by RTE to participate in a debate and what are his intentions in that regard? Deputy Joe Higgins: The Taoiseach should escape from his handlers for once. Deputy Patrick O’Donovan: Deputy Higgins is doing a bit of handling these days himself. The Taoiseach: I will deal any time with Deputy Higgins. An Ceann Comhairle: This is Leaders’ Questions. Please allow the Taoiseach to respond to Deputy Martin’s question. 385 Leaders’ 23 May 2012. Questions The Taoiseach: I thank Deputy Martin for his public support, and that of his party, for a “Yes” vote on the referendum on the fiscal stability treaty. It is important there is no equivo- cation about this. It is of particular and fundamental concern for the future of our people and country. This evening’s informal meeting of European leaders is, I am glad to say, the realisation of the claims by quite a number of leaders for some time that Europe should focus on growth investment and job opportunities. It is important to note that this is a meeting of 27 leaders rather than of 25 leaders because growth affects all European Union countries. The opportunity and potential exists for the European Union to be the engine of trade in a global sense, to reduce the cost of business and to complete the Single Market. It also has potential in the digital area and to deal with the crisis issues in the eurozone in the context of the discussions on project bonds, eurobonds and other facilities to relieve pressure on sovereign Governments and to look at the broader spectrum of EU-US and EU-China trade relations. I expect leaders of the 27 countries will contribute to this evening’s meeting on the growth agenda for the future. I am happy to participate in that debate from a national and European perspective. I have no difficulty discussing the fiscal stability treaty. However, I turned down the invitation to appear on a particular programme for good reasons. RTE has invited me, as Taoiseach, to do a broadcast on Sunday following the Ard-Fheis contribution of the leader of Sinn Fein, Deputy Gerry Adams. However, I believe that to be predicated on how much time Deputy Adams devotes to the fiscal stability treaty issue on Saturday evening. A Deputy: Deputy Adams will have to read the treaty now. Deputy Brendan Howlin: His contribution will be brief. (Interruptions). The Taoiseach: I am glad Deputy Martin raised the matter. Were I to cave in to the pressure that has been around for some days I would be elevating Deputy Adams to the position of Leader of the Opposition—— Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn: The Taoiseach has called him that at least ten times. He started this. The Taoiseach: ——which he is not. I have yet to hear Deputy Adams, as the leader of a political party, say he accepts the validity of the Irish Constitution, Bunreacht na hÉireann. I am a little sceptical about much of what I hear from that side of the House. We will consider these matters. Deputy Micheál Martin: I am unclear as to the Taoiseach’s response to my question. Deputy Finian McGrath: The Taoiseach is like Jedward. Deputy Micheál Martin: I accept that today’s meeting is extremely important. However, the debate here is equally important. I read in The Irish Times this morning that the Taoiseach’s spokesman confirmed last night that the Taoiseach had received a request from RTE to partici- pate in a leaders’ debate. Deputy Brendan Howlin: It must be true so. Deputy Micheál Martin: The spokesman said the Taoiseach had received numerous requests. I asked the Taoiseach if he would confirm that he had received a request from RTE to partici- 386 Leaders’ 23 May 2012. Questions pate in a debate. Fianna Fáil has inquired of RTE if there is to be a debate but has received no response in that regard. It is a fair question. I am not getting involved in any issue between the Taoiseach and Sinn Féin. Sinn Féin is holding its Ard-Fheis this weekend—— Deputy Emmet Stagg: Ammunition for Fianna Fáil. Deputy Micheál Martin: ——which I believe is the context of the invitation to the Taoiseach to do a broadcast. It is an unusual set of circumstances because normally political parties holding ard-fheiseanna are informed by RTE that if an Ard-Fheis takes place six weeks in advance of any general election there will be no coverage of it. An Ceann Comhairle: Can we have a supplementary question, please? Deputy Micheál Martin: That would normally be the case but this is a change of tack in regard to how Sinn Féin is being treated. The Taoiseach has been invited but that is not really my point. That is for another day and other parties will also have issues about it in the fullness of time. Deputy Emmet Stagg: Do you have an issue? An Ceann Comhairle: Thank you, you are over time. Deputy Micheál Martin: What I am trying to get at here is the need for a genuine political debate between the political leaders on both sides who are advocating positions on the treaty. It is the fairest way to resolve any claims or counter-claims about lack of balance in how particular parties are treated or in terms of the campaign. More important, we should have the confidence in our position to be able to go on national television and debate the issues. People do not understand a reluctance to become involved. An Ceann Comhairle: Deputy, you are considerably over time. Do you have your supplemen- tary question? Deputy Finian McGrath: What about the Independents? Deputy Micheál Martin: Will the Taoiseach confirm that RTE has invited him to participate in a debate, as his spokesman stated last night? The Taoiseach: We need to reflect on this in the House in a general sense. Leaving the referendum and the treaty question aside for the moment, we need to look at what is happening in regard to referenda in general. Referenda are matters for the people to make decisions on; they are not about giving profiles to individual politicians. Irrespective of the public response in its votes for the different parties, that situation is never reflected in the case of a referendum. I have been through perhaps 22 of the Twenty-six Counties debating this publicly, in village halls, town halls and on the streets—— Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett: Not debating.
Recommended publications
  • His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick for the Tribunal: Mrs. Mary Laverty
    A P P E A R A N C E S The Sole Member: His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick For the Tribunal: Mrs. Mary Laverty, SC Mr. Justin Dillon, SC Mr. Dara Hayes, BL Mr. Fintan Valentine, BL Instructed by: Jane McKevitt Solicitor For the Commissioner of An Garda Siochana: Mr. Diarmuid McGuinness, SC Mr. Michael Durack, SC Mr. Gareth Baker, BL Instructed by: Mary Cummins CSSO For Owen Corrigan: Mr. Jim O'Callaghan, SC Mr. Darren Lehane, BL Instructed by: Fintan Lawlor Lawlor Partners Solicitors For Leo Colton: Mr. Paul Callan, SC Mr. Eamon Coffey, BL Instructed by: Dermot Lavery Solicitors For Finbarr Hickey: Fionnuala O'Sullivan, BL Instructed by: James MacGuill & Co. For the Attorney General: Ms. Nuala Butler, SC Mr. Douglas Clarke, SC Instructed by: CSSO For Freddie Scappaticci: Eavanna Fitzgerald, BL Pauline O'Hare Instructed by: Michael Flanigan Solicitor For Kevin Fulton: Mr. Neil Rafferty, QC Instructed by: John McAtamney Solicitor For Breen Family: Mr. John McBurney For Buchanan Family/ Heather Currie: Ernie Waterworth McCartan Turkington Breen Solicitors For the PSNI: Mark Robinson, BL NOTICE: A WORD INDEX IS PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF THIS TRANSCRIPT. THIS IS A USEFUL INDEXING SYSTEM, WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO QUICKLY SEE THE WORDS USED IN THE TRANSCRIPT, WHERE THEY OCCUR AND HOW OFTEN. EXAMPLE: - DOYLE [2] 30:28 45:17 THE WORD “DOYLE” OCCURS TWICE PAGE 30, LINE 28 PAGE 45, LINE 17 I N D E X Witness Page No. Line No. WITNESS M EXAMINED BY MRS. LAVERTY 2 1 CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR. McGUINNESS 27 1 CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR.
    [Show full text]
  • His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick for the Tribunal
    A P P E A R A N C E S The Sole Member: His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick For the Tribunal: Mrs. Mary Laverty, SC Mr. Justin Dillon, SC Mr. Dara Hayes, BL Mr. Fintan Valentine, BL Instructed by: Jane McKevitt Solicitor For the Commissioner of An Garda Siochana: Mr. Diarmuid McGuinness, SC Mr. Michael Durack, SC Mr. Gareth Baker, BL Instructed by: Mary Cummins CSSO For Owen Corrigan: Mr. Jim O'Callaghan, SC Mr. Darren Lehane, BL Instructed by: Fintan Lawlor Lawlor Partners Solicitors For Leo Colton: Mr. Paul Callan, SC Mr. Eamon Coffey, BL Instructed by: Dermot Lavery Solicitors For Finbarr Hickey: Fionnuala O'Sullivan, BL Instructed by: James MacGuill & Co. For the Attorney General: Ms. Nuala Butler, SC Mr. Douglas Clarke, SC Instructed by: CSSO For Freddie Scappaticci: Eavanna Fitzgerald, BL Pauline O'Hare Instructed by: Michael Flanigan Solicitor For Kevin Fulton: Mr. Neil Rafferty, QC Instructed by: John McAtamney Solicitor For Breen Family: Mr. John McBurney For Buchanan Family/ Heather Currie: Ernie Waterworth McCartan Turkington Breen Solicitors For the PSNI: Mark Robinson, BL NOTICE: A WORD INDEX IS PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF THIS TRANSCRIPT. THIS IS A USEFUL INDEXING SYSTEM, WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO QUICKLY SEE THE WORDS USED IN THE TRANSCRIPT, WHERE THEY OCCUR AND HOW OFTEN. EXAMPLE: - DOYLE [2] 30:28 45:17 THE WORD “DOYLE” OCCURS TWICE PAGE 30, LINE 28 PAGE 45, LINE 17 I N D E X Witness Page No. Line No. WILLIAM FRAZER EXAMINED BY MRS. LAVERTY 19 1 CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR. LEHANE 37 16 CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithwick Tribunal - 5 October 2011 - Day 40 1
    A P P E A R A N C E S The Sole Member: His Honour Judge Peter Smithwick For the Tribunal: Mrs. Mary Laverty, SC Mr. Justin Dillon, SC Mr. Dara Hayes, BL Mr. Fintan Valentine, BL Instructed by: Jane McKevitt Solicitor For the Commissioner of An Garda Siochana: Mr. Diarmuid McGuinness, SC Mr. Michael Durack, SC Mr. Gareth Baker, BL Instructed by: Mary Cummins CSSO For Owen Corrigan: Mr. Jim O'Callaghan, SC Mr. Darren Lehane, BL Instructed by: Fintan Lawlor Lawlor Partners Solicitors For Leo Colton: Mr. Paul Callan, SC Mr. Eamon Coffey, BL Instructed by: Dermot Lavery Solicitors For Finbarr Hickey: Fionnuala O'Sullivan, BL Instructed by: James MacGuill & Co. For the Attorney General: Ms. Nuala Butler, SC Mr. Douglas Clarke, SC Instructed by: CSSO For Freddie Scappaticci: Niall Mooney, BL Instructed by: Michael Flanigan Solicitor For Kevin Fulton: Mr. Neil Rafferty Instructed by: John McAtamney Solicitor For Breen Family: Mr. John McBurney For Buchanan Family/ Heather Currie: Ernie Waterworth McCartan Turkington Breen Solicitors NOTICE: A WORD INDEX IS PROVIDED AT THE BACK OF THIS TRANSCRIPT. THIS IS A USEFUL INDEXING SYSTEM, WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO QUICKLY SEE THE WORDS USED IN THE TRANSCRIPT, WHERE THEY OCCUR AND HOW OFTEN. EXAMPLE: - DOYLE [2] 30:28 45:17 THE WORD “DOYLE” OCCURS TWICE PAGE 30, LINE 28 PAGE 45, LINE 17 I N D E X Witness Page No. Line No. CHAIRMAN DELIVERED HIS RULING 1 22 WITNESS 60 EXAMINED BY MR. DILLON 5 1 CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR. DURACK 15 24 CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR. RAFFERTY 19 27 RE-EXAMINED BY MR.
    [Show full text]
  • The Murder of Patrick Finucane
    The Report of the Patrick Finucane Review The Rt Hon Sir Desmond de Silva QC December 2012 Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 12 December 2012 for The Report of the Patrick Finucane Review The Rt Hon Sir Desmond de Silva QC Volume I Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 12 December 2012 HC 802-I London: The Stationery Office £75.00 Two volumes not to be sold separately © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk This document is also available from our website at www.patfinucanereview.org ISBN: 9780102981087 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 254679 12/12 23621 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents Foreword 1 Executive Summary and Principal Conclusions 3 CHAPTER 1 Background to this Review 25 Introduction 25 Interpretation of my Terms of Reference 26 Methodology 31 Previous investigations and the Judgment in Finucane v The United Kingdom 39 The right to life 45 PART 1: THE CONTEXT TO THE MURDER OF PATRICK FINUCANE CHAPTER 2 The
    [Show full text]
  • Clonoe-Report-Lres
    AMBUSH, ASSASSINATION AND IMPUNITY The Killings of Kevin Barry O’Donnell, Patrick Vincent, Peter Clancy and Sean O’Farrell SUNDAY 16TH FEBRUARY 1992 L SHOOT IL T O K O K T I L T L O O H S THE UNTOLD STORIES OF RELATIVES, VICTIMS AND SURVIVORS AMBUSH, ASSASSINATION AND IMPUNITY The Killings of Peter Clancy, Sean Farrell, Kevin Barry O’Donnell and Patrick Vincent Relatives for Justice 39 Glen Road Belfast BT11 8BB Tel: 028 9062 7171 Fax: 028 9060 5558 Email: [email protected] www.relativesforjustice.com Relatives for Justice 42 Irish Street Dungannon Co. Tyrone BT70 1DQ Tel: 028 8775 1697 Email: [email protected] RELATIVES FOR JUSTICE Contents Introduction 3 The Harassment of Kevin Barry O’Donnell and Sean O’Farrell 4 Clonoe 16th February 1992 4 The Funerals 8 Pre-Meditated and Pre-Planned 10 Belfast High Court finds shooting “unjustified” 12 Who sanctioned the killings in Clonoe? 14 Shoot-To-Kill Policy 16 International Intervention 22 1 HUMAN RIGhts New opportunities 23 International standards 23 Families Developing Article 2 Standards 25 Inquests 25 The Right to Legal Representation 27 Conclusion 27 Key Points 28 The Families make the Following Calls 29 Biographies of Deceased 30 Acknowledgements 32 PETER CLANCY, SEAN FARRELL, KEVIN BARRY O’DONNELL, PATRICK VINCENT PETER CLANCY, SEAN FARRELL, KEVIN BARRY O’DONNELL, PATRICK VINCENT PETER CLANCY, SEAN FARRELL, KEVIN BARRY O’DONNELL, PATRICK VINCENT PETER CLANCY, SEAN FARRELL, KEVIN BARRY O’DONNELL, PATRICK VINCENT PETER CLANCY, SEAN FARRELL, KEVIN BARRY O’DONNELL,
    [Show full text]
  • 20 January 2014. REVISED.Pdf
    Official Report (Hansard) Monday 20 January 2014 Volume 91, No 1 Session 2013-2014 Contents Assembly Business……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Road Races (Amendment) Bill: Royal Assent ................................................................................... 1 Ministerial Statements North/South Ministerial Council: Institutional ..................................................................................... 2 North/South Ministerial Council: Agriculture ...................................................................................... 6 British-Irish Council: Housing Work Stream ...................................................................................... 11 Executive Committee Business Health and Social Care (Amendment) Bill: Consideration Stage ...................................................... 14 Reservoirs Bill: First Stage ................................................................................................................ 14 Private Members' Business Common Agricultural Policy: Rural Development Programme Funding ........................................... 15 Oral Answers to Questions Employment and Learning ................................................................................................................. 24 Enterprise, Trade and Investment………………………………………………………………………… 32 Private Members' Business Common Agricultural Policy: Rural Development Programme Funding (Continued) ....................... 41 Smithwick Tribunal ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Consultative Group on the Past 2 REPORT of the Consultative Group on the Past REPORT of the Consultative Group on the Past 3
    REPORT OF THE Consultative Group on the Past 2 REPORT OF THE Consultative Group on the Past REPORT OF THE Consultative Group on the Past 3 Presented to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, in accordance with the Terms of Reference given to the Consultative Group on the Past on 22 June 2007. 23 January 2009 4 REPORT OF THE Consultative Group on the Past “To look backward for a while is to refresh the eye, to restore it, and to render it more fit for its prime function of looking forward.” Margaret Fairless Barber (b. 1869, d. 1901) CONTENTS Index 6 CONTENTS | REPORT OF THE Consultative Group on the Past CONTENTS | List of Abbreviations 12 Foreword by the Co-Chairs of the Consultative Group on the Past 14 Summary of Main Recommendations 16 Executive Summary 22 SECTION 1 Work of the Group and a Road Map for the Future CHAPTER 1 | The Work of the Group The Consultative Group on the Past 44 Membership of the Consultative Group 44 The Group’s Engagement with Society 45 The Landscape of Initiatives 47 CHAPTER 2 | Developing a Road Map for the Future The Group’s Guiding Principles 49 The Conflict 51 The Past 51 Remembrance for Reconciliation 53 Reconciliation, Truth and Forgiveness 54 Information and Truth 56 The Principle of Justice 57 REPORT OF THE Consultative Group on the Past CONTENTS | 7 SECTION 2 The Legacy of the Conflict CHAPTER 3 | The Conflict and the Impact on Society Overview 60 The Facts and Figures 60 Defining the Impact on Society 62 Understanding Perspectives 65 The Ongoing Conflict: 66 Victims Issues ‘Ulsterisation’ of
    [Show full text]
  • We Publish a Report Into the 1998 Omagh Bombings, Which Involved an IRA Bomb That Killed
    A REPORT INTO THE OMAGH BOMBING, 15 AUGUST 1998 MAY 2013 1 THE OMAGH BOMBING, 15 AUGUST 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND REMAINING QUESTIONS Rights Watch (UK) has produced a report into the Omagh Bombing, 15 August 1998 after being approached by the Omagh Support and Self Help Group who represent a number of the relatives of the victims and some of the survivors. They seek an independent cross-border public inquiry into the attack on their town so soon after the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement making this act of terrorist violence the first after the peace and therefore overshadowing the ensuing evolution of peace in Northern Ireland after bloody internal conflict. The bombing continues to overshadow the town of Omagh. This burden could be relieved in part if there were some answers to some questions about the failure of state mechanisms to prevent the Omagh bombing, and if it was not preventable, the failure to bring the perpetrators to justice. Justice through accountability would then contribute to peace and progress in Northern Ireland and alleviate some of the suffering of this town. RW (UK) has advised on the available models of investigation available to hold the state to account where there has been a violation of human rights in which the state is implicated either as the direct perpetrator or where the abuse could have been prevented. Additionally, we have attended meetings with the UK government where the members of the Omagh Support and Self Help Group have been in negotiation; we have lobbied in the UK and in the USA regarding the Omagh bombing and its significance as occurring so soon after the brokering of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement and therefore being a tragedy of the peace and not of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Peace Monitoring Report
    Community Relations Council Northern Ireland Peace Monitoring Report Number Three March 2014 Paul Nolan Peace Monitoring Report The Northern Ireland Peace Monitoring Report Number Three Paul Nolan March 2014 3 Peace Monitoring Report Data sources and acknowledgements This report draws mainly on statistics that are in the public domain. Data sets from various government departments and public bodies in Northern Ireland have been used and, in order to provide a wider context, comparisons are made which draw upon figures produced by government departments and public bodies in England, Scotland, Wales and the Republic of Ireland. Using this variety of sources means there is no standard model that applies across the different departments and jurisdictions. Many organisations have also changed the way in which they collect their data over the years, which means that in some cases it has not been possible to provide historical perspective on a consistent basis. For some indicators, only survey-based data is available. When interpreting statistics from survey data, such as the Labour Force Survey, it is worth bearing in mind that they are estimates associated with confidence intervals (ranges in which the true value is likely to lie). In other cases where official figures may not present the full picture, survey data is included because it may provide a more accurate estimate – thus, for example, findings from the Northern Ireland Crime Survey are included along with the official crime statistics from the PSNI. The production of the report has been greatly assisted by the willing cooperation of many statisticians and public servants, particularly those from the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, the PSNI and the various government departments.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 December 2013 REVISED.Pdf
    Official Report (Hansard) Monday 9 December 2013 Volume 90, No 3 Session 2013-2014 Contents Ministerial Statement Paediatric Congenital Cardiac Services ............................................................................................ 1 Matters of the Day Nelson Mandela ................................................................................................................................. 9 Smithwick Report ............................................................................................................................... 13 Gun Attacks: PSNI Officers ............................................................................................................... 18 Oral Answers to Questions Environment....................................................................................................................................... 21 Justice ................................................................................................................................................ 28 Ministerial Statement Criminal Justice: Intergovernmental Agreement on Cooperation ...................................................... 38 Executive Committee Business Road Races (Amendment) Bill: Further Consideration Stage .......................................................... 42 Committee Business Electricity Policy: Security of Supply ................................................................................................. 56 Assembly Business Extension of Sitting ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Doug Beattie MC MLA, on Behalf of the Ulster Unionist Party (LEG0033)
    Written evidence submitted by Doug Beattie MC MLA, on behalf of the Ulster Unionist Party (LEG0033) “Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” - George Orwell 1984 There is a great deal of frustration with regard to legacy and in particular how the Government has failed to challenge the actions of those who are seeking to rewrite the history of the Troubles. The sad fact is that we have arrived in the position we are in at present, in no small part because successive British Governments have never sought to defend themselves and their actions in Northern Ireland with any conviction. Rather, successive administrations have appeared almost embarrassed at the role played by the UK in defending its territorial integrity, its sovereignty and its citizens, and in defeating a sustained and brutal terrorist campaign. Certainly the Spanish Government showed no similar reticence when it came to facing down not only the violence from Basque separatists ETA, but crucially also their propaganda. The Spanish Government didn’t issue 200 odd ‘comfort letters’ as part of a secret side deal with a bloody terrorist gang. Tony Blair’s Government did. Nor has there ever been a serious attempt to get the Republic of Ireland to face up to the role it played during the Troubles. Its territory was used by the IRA to import arms, store weapons, mount hundreds of cross border attacks, co-ordinate ethnic cleansing of minority Protestant communities in the border area, and act as a safe haven for IRA terrorists on the run.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithwick Tribunal - 29 May, 2013 - Day 130 1
    I N D E X Witness Page No. Line No. OWEN CORRIGAN CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR. O'CALLAGHAN 3 5 Smithwick Tribunal - 29 May, 2013 - Day 130 1 1 THE TRIBUNAL RESUMED ON THE 29TH OF MAY, 2013, AS FOLLOWS: 2 3 MR. DILLON: We are going to continue today with the 4 evidence of Mr. Corrigan, who has rejoined us now, having 5 been through the travails of his medical treatment. 6 7 Just one or two matters of housekeeping. We are here, I 8 understand we have this room, this courtroom, for three 9 days, until Friday, and, as I understand it, it's your 10 intention to conclude all matters by Friday. Now, what we 11 have to deal with between now and Friday is the conclusion 12 of Mr. Corrigan's evidence, and there are some 13 miscellaneous matters which arise which can be dealt with 14 in an afternoon, whether it be -- I think people probably 15 aren't ready to deal with them this afternoon, but maybe 16 tomorrow afternoon or Friday afternoon, and there may be 17 some matters in relation to submissions. My suggestion to 18 you, Chairman, is that anything in relation to submissions 19 should wait until all matters have been dealt with. At 20 that point, everybody will have the complete picture of 21 what's in issue, if I can put it that way, what they have 22 to deal with in terms of submissions. So, if that issue 23 could be parked 'til the very end, if indeed it arises, but 24 left to the very end.
    [Show full text]