DOCSLIB.ORG

Structure and Junctional Complexes of Endothelial, Epithelial and Glial Brain Barriers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Structure and Junctional Complexes of Endothelial, Epithelial and Glial Brain Barriers International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Structure and Junctional Complexes of Endothelial, Epithelial and Glial Brain Barriers Mariana Castro Dias *, Josephine A. Mapunda, Mykhailo Vladymyrov and Britta Engelhardt * Theodor Kocher Institute, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; [email protected] (J.A.M.); [email protected] (M.V.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.C.D.); [email protected] (B.E.) Received: 14 October 2019; Accepted: 26 October 2019; Published: 29 October 2019 Abstract: The homeostasis of the central nervous system (CNS) is ensured by the endothelial, epithelial, mesothelial and glial brain barriers, which strictly control the passage of molecules, solutes and immune cells. While the endothelial blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the epithelial blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) have been extensively investigated, less is known about the epithelial and mesothelial arachnoid barrier and the glia limitans. Here, we summarize current knowledge of the cellular composition of the brain barriers with a specific focus on describing the molecular constituents of their junctional complexes. We propose that the brain barriers maintain CNS immune privilege by dividing the CNS into compartments that differ with regard to their role in immune surveillance of the CNS. We close by providing a brief overview on experimental tools allowing for reliable in vivo visualization of the brain barriers and their junctional complexes and thus the respective CNS compartments. Keywords: brain barriers; blood-brain barrier; neurovascular unit; blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier; arachnoid barrier; glia limitans; tight junctions; adherens junctions 1. Introduction The brain barriers established by the endothelial blood-brain barrier (BBB), the epithelial blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), the meningeal brain barriers and the blood spinal cord barrier are essential for maintaining central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis [1]. While the structural and junctional components of the BBB and of the BCSFB of the choroid plexus (ChP) have been vastly explored and described, much less is known about the cells and junctional complexes establishing the meningeal barriers and the glia limitans. Development of the CNS vasculature begins with the process of vasculogenesis, where angioblasts, which originate from the mesoderm, move to the head region and form the primary perineural vascular plexus around the developing brain. The proliferating neuroectodermal tissue is invaded by vascular sprouts from the primary perineural plexus establishing the brain vasculature by a process called angiogenesis. The unique barrier properties of the brain endothelial cells are not intrinsic and are rather induced by a process referred to as barriergenesis by the continuous crosstalk with the developing neuroectodermal tissue [2–5]. The ChP develops from different locations along the dorsal axis of the neural tube, with the hindbrain ChP of the fourth ventricle being the first to be formed, once the neural tube is closed [6]. While the ChP stroma develops from mesenchymal cells, the ChP epithelium derives from neuroepithelial cells. Despite the different origin along the rostral-caudal axis of the developing nervous system, the mature ChP epithelia are morphologically similar (reviewed in Reference [6]). The meningeal barriers comprise three layers: the dura mater, the arachnoid mater and the pia mater, and cover the brain and the spinal cord from its earliest stages of development, establishing Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5372; doi:10.3390/ijms20215372 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5372 2 of 27 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 26 meningesa protective has covering not much of theadvanced CNS in beyond the adult. identi Ourfying current the understandingorigins of pial, of arachnoid the development and dural of fibroblaststhe meninges in the has frontal not much brain advanced from neural beyond crest, identifyingand in the midbrain, the origins hindbrain of pial, arachnoidand spinal andcord duralfrom mesodermfibroblasts in[7]. the Despite frontal their brain differences from neural in crest,developmental and in the midbrain,origin, the hindbraincells of the and pia, spinal arachnoid cord from and duramesoderm mater [ 7have]. Despite been theirdescribed differences to establish in developmental functionally origin, similar the ba cellsrriers. of the However, pia, arachnoid the respective and dura barriermater have function been may described be established to establish by different functionally molecular similar compon barriers.ents However, of their thejunctional respective complexes barrier [8–11].function may be established by different molecular components of their junctional complexes [8–11]. Taken together, junctionaljunctional complexes established between cells of the brain barriers might not only didifferffer betweenbetween the the di differentfferent barriers barriers but but also also within within one respectiveone respective barrier barrier along along the rostral-caudal the rostral- caudalaxis. Here, axis. weHere, summarize we summarize the current the current knowledge knowledg of thee of brain the brain barriers, barriers, with with a particular a particular focus focus on onthe molecularthe molecular components components of their of junctional their junction complexes.al complexes. Additionally, Additionally, we suggest we that suggest visualization that visualizationof brain barriers of brain junctional barriers complexes junctional provides complexes useful provides landmarks useful forlandmarksin vivo imaging for in vivo of immuneimaging ofsurveillance immune surveillance of the CNS. of the CNS. 2. Blood-Brain Blood-Brain Barrier and Its Central Players: Cellular Cellular and and Acellular Acellular Components Components of the Neurovascular Unit (NVU) The brainbrain vasculature vasculature is ais big a andbig complexand complex network network composed composed of arteries of andarteries arterioles, and capillaries,arterioles, venulescapillaries, and venules veins, whichand veins, allows which for theallows vital for distribution the vital distribution of nutrients of and nutrients oxygen and to the oxygen CNS to at the CNSlevel at of the level microvasculature, of the microvasculature, namely arterioles, namely capillaries arterioles, andcapillaries post-capillary and post-capillary venules [12 ].venules Brain [12].microvascular Brain microvascular endothelial cells,endothelial referred cells, to as referr the blood-brained to as the barrier blood-brain (BBB), possessbarrier unique(BBB), featurespossess uniquerestricting features the free restricting passage ofthe ions, free molecules passage of and ions, cells molecules from the and blood cells into from the CNSthe blood parenchyma, into the whileCNS parenchyma,facilitating the while transport facilitating of toxic compoundsthe transport out ofof thetoxic CNS compounds [13,14]. Development out of the and CNS maintenance [13,14],. Developmentof BBB characteristics and maintenance in CNS microvascular of BBB characteristics endothelium in CNS relies microvascular on the continuous endothelium crosstalk relies between on thecellular continuous and acellular crosstalk elements between of cellular the CNS. and In acellula the adult,r elements the entity of the of BBBCNS. endothelium, In the adult, the pericytes, entity ofastrocytes, BBB endothelium, and the basal pericytes, membranes astrocytes, are thus and collectively the basal membranes referred to as are the thus neurovascular collectively unitreferred (NVU) to (representedas the neurovascular in Figure unit1)[ 15 (NVU)]. Maintenance (represented of a in functional Figure 1) NVU [15]. isMaintenance a prerequisite of fora functional BBB function NVU and is arequires prerequisite understanding for BBB function of the specific and requires contributions understa ofnding these of cells the tospecific barrier contributions function. of these cells to barrier function. Figure 1. Schematic representation of the components of the neurovascular unit at the level of brain capillaries and post-capillary venules. Drawings Drawings of of the the individual individual cell cell types types were adapted from Servier Medical Art (http://smart.servier.com/), (http://smart.servier.com/), licensedlicensed under a Creative Common Attribution 3.0 Generic License. 2.1. Endothelial Cells 2.1. Endothelial Cells Most studies of the BBB focus on the capillary endothelial cells, due to their unique Most studies of the BBB focus on the capillary endothelial cells, due to their unique properties properties [16,17]. Besides lacking fenestrae, these endothelial cells are brought together by the [16,17]. Besides lacking fenestrae, these endothelial cells are brought together by the presence of presence of continuous and complex tight junctions that prohibit free diffusion of molecules across continuous and complex tight junctions that prohibit free diffusion of molecules across the BBB via the paracellular route [18–20]. Additionally, they have very low pinocytosis rates when compared to Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5372 3 of 27 the BBB via the paracellular route [18–20]. Additionally, they have very low pinocytosis rates when compared to the peripheral endothelium [21,22]. Of notice, the major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2 (Mfsd2a), a membrane transport protein, is specifically expressed in the CNS endothelium and acts as a key regulator suppressing vesicular
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PARSANA-DISSERTATION-2020.Pdf
    DECIPHERING TRANSCRIPTIONAL PATTERNS OF GENE REGULATION: A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH by Princy Parsana A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland July, 2020 © 2020 Princy Parsana All rights reserved Abstract With rapid advancements in sequencing technology, we now have the ability to sequence the entire human genome, and to quantify expression of tens of thousands of genes from hundreds of individuals. This provides an extraordinary opportunity to learn phenotype relevant genomic patterns that can improve our understanding of molecular and cellular processes underlying a trait. The high dimensional nature of genomic data presents a range of computational and statistical challenges. This dissertation presents a compilation of projects that were driven by the motivation to efficiently capture gene regulatory patterns in the human transcriptome, while addressing statistical and computational challenges that accompany this data. We attempt to address two major difficulties in this domain: a) artifacts and noise in transcriptomic data, andb) limited statistical power. First, we present our work on investigating the effect of artifactual variation in gene expression data and its impact on trans-eQTL discovery. Here we performed an in-depth analysis of diverse pre-recorded covariates and latent confounders to understand their contribution to heterogeneity in gene expression measurements. Next, we discovered 673 trans-eQTLs across 16 human tissues using v6 data from the Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Finally, we characterized two trait-associated trans-eQTLs; one in Skeletal Muscle and another in Thyroid. Second, we present a principal component based residualization method to correct gene expression measurements prior to reconstruction of co-expression networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strain Rates in the Brain, Brainstem, Dura, and Skull Under Dynamic Loadings
    Mathematical and Computational Applications Article The Strain Rates in the Brain, Brainstem, Dura, and Skull under Dynamic Loadings Mohammad Hosseini-Farid 1,2,* , MaryamSadat Amiri-Tehrani-Zadeh 3, Mohammadreza Ramzanpour 1, Mariusz Ziejewski 1 and Ghodrat Karami 1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58104, USA; [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (M.Z.); [email protected] (G.K.) 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA 3 Department of Computer Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58104, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-7012315859 Received: 7 March 2020; Accepted: 5 April 2020; Published: 7 April 2020 Abstract: Knowing the precise material properties of intracranial head organs is crucial for studying the biomechanics of head injury. It has been shown that these biological tissues are significantly rate-dependent; hence, their material properties should be determined with respect to the range of deformation rate they experience. In this paper, a validated finite element human head model is used to investigate the biomechanics of the head in impact and blast, leading to traumatic brain injuries (TBI). We simulate the head under various directions and velocities of impacts, as well as helmeted and unhelmeted head under blast shock waves. It is demonstrated that the strain rates for the brain 1 are in the range of 36 to 241 s− , approximately 1.9 and 0.86 times the resulting head acceleration under impacts and blast scenarios, respectively. The skull was found to experience a rate in the range 1 of 14 to 182 s− , approximately 0.7 and 0.43 times the head acceleration corresponding to impact and blast cases.
    [Show full text]
  • What to Expect After Having a Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Information for Patients and Families Table of Contents
    What to expect after having a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) Information for patients and families Table of contents What is a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)? .......................................... 3 What are the signs that I may have had an SAH? .................................. 4 How did I get this aneurysm? ..................................................................... 4 Why do aneurysms need to be treated?.................................................... 4 What is an angiogram? .................................................................................. 5 How are aneurysms repaired? ..................................................................... 6 What are common complications after having an SAH? ..................... 8 What is vasospasm? ...................................................................................... 8 What is hydrocephalus? ............................................................................... 10 What is hyponatremia? ................................................................................ 12 What happens as I begin to get better? .................................................... 13 What can I expect after I leave the hospital? .......................................... 13 How will the SAH change my health? ........................................................ 14 Will the SAH cause any long-term effects? ............................................. 14 How will my emotions be affected? .......................................................... 15 When should
    [Show full text]
  • Meninges Ventricles And
    Meninges ,ventricles & CSF Dr.Sanaa Al-Shaarawy Dr. Essam Eldin Salama OBJECTIVES • By the end of the lecture the student should be able to: • Describe the cerebral meninges & list the main dural folds. • Describe the spinal meninges & locate the level of the termination of each of them. • Describe the importance of the subarachnoid space. • List the Ventricular system of the CNS and locate the site of each of them. • Describe the formation, circulation, drainage, and functions of the CSF. • Know some clinical point about the CSF MENINGES • The brain and spinal cord are invested by three concentric membranes ; • The outermost layer is the dura matter. • The middle layer is the arachnoid matter. • The innermost layer is the pia matter. DURA MATER ▪The cranial dura is a two layered tough, fibrous thick membrane that surrounds the brain. ▪It is formed of two layers; periosteal and meningeal. ▪The periosteal layer is attached to the skull. ▪The meningeal layer is folded forming the dural folds : falx cerebri, and tentorium cerebelli. ▪Sensory innervation of the dura is mostly from : meningeal branches of the trigeminal and vagus nerves & C1 to C3(upper cervical Ns.). DURA MATER Folds Two large reflection of dura extend into the cranial cavity : 1.The falx cerebri, In the midline, ▪It is a vertical sickle-shaped sheet of dura, extends from the cranial roof into the great longitudinal fissure between the two cerebral hemispheres. ▪It has an attached border adherent to the skull. ▪And a free border lies above the corpus callosum. DURA MATER Folds 2. A horizontal shelf of dura, The tentorium cerebelli, ▪ It lies between the posterior part of the cerebral hemispheres and the cerebellum.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 4: the Meninges And
    1/1/2016 Introduction • Protection of the brain – Bone (skull) The Nervous System – Membranes (meninges) – Watery cushion (cerebrospinal fluid) – Blood-brain barrier (astrocytes) Meninges CSF The Meninges The Meninges • Series of membranes • Three layers • Cover and protect the CNS – Dura mater • Anchor and cushion the brain – Arachnoid mater – • Contain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Pia mater The Meninges • Dura mater – “Tough mother” Skin of scalp Periosteum – Strongest meninx Bone of skull Periosteal Dura – Fibrous connective tissue Meningeal mater Superior Arachnoid mater – sagittal sinus Pia mater Limit excessive movement of the brain Subdural Arachnoid villus – space Blood vessel Forms partitions in the skull Subarachnoid Falx cerebri space (in longitudinal fissure only) Figure 12.24 1 1/1/2016 Superior The Meninges sagittal sinus Falx cerebri • Arachnoid mater – “Spider mother” Straight sinus – Middle layer with weblike extensions Crista galli – Separated from the dura mater by the subdural space of the Tentorium ethmoid cerebelli – Subarachnoid space contains CSF and blood vessels bone Falx Pituitary cerebelli gland (a) Dural septa Figure 12.25a The Meninges • Pia mater – “Gentle mother” – Connected to the dura mater by projections from the arachnoid mater – Layer of delicate vascularized connective tissue – Clings tightly to the brain T Meningitis TT121212 Ligamentum flavumflavumflavum L • LL555 Lumbar puncture Inflammation of meninges needle entering subarachnoid • May be bacterial or viral spacespacespace LLL444 • Diagnosed by
    [Show full text]
  • 1A Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
    The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2012) 12, 134–146 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved 1470-269X/12 www.nature.com/tpj ORIGINAL ARTICLE Network analysis of transcriptional regulation in response to intramuscular interferon-b-1a multiple sclerosis treatment M Hecker1,2, RH Goertsches2,3, Interferon-b (IFN-b) is one of the major drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS) 3 2 treatment. The purpose of this study was to characterize the transcriptional C Fatum , D Koczan , effects induced by intramuscular IFN-b-1a therapy in patients with relapsing– 2 1 H-J Thiesen , R Guthke remitting form of MS. By using Affymetrix DNA microarrays, we obtained and UK Zettl3 genome-wide expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 24 MS patients within the first 4 weeks of IFN-b administration. We identified 1Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research 121 genes that were significantly up- or downregulated compared with and Infection Biology—Hans-Knoell-Institute, baseline, with stronger changed expression at 1 week after start of therapy. Jena, Germany; 2University of Rostock, Institute of Immunology, Rostock, Germany and Eleven transcription factor-binding sites (TFBS) are overrepresented in the 3University of Rostock, Department of Neurology, regulatory regions of these genes, including those of IFN regulatory factors Rostock, Germany and NF-kB. We then applied TFBS-integrating least angle regression, a novel integrative algorithm for deriving gene regulatory networks from gene Correspondence: M Hecker, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product expression data and TFBS information, to reconstruct the underlying network Research and Infection Biology—Hans-Knoell- of molecular interactions. An NF-kB-centered sub-network of genes was Institute, Beutenbergstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningioma ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION Meningioma ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABOUT THE AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION Meningioma Founded in 1973, the American Brain Tumor Association (ABTA) was the first national nonprofit advocacy organization dedicated solely to brain tumor research. For nearly 45 years, the ABTA has been providing comprehensive resources that support the complex needs of brain tumor patients and caregivers, as well as the critical funding of research in the pursuit of breakthroughs in brain tumor diagnosis, treatment and care. To learn more about the ABTA, visit www.abta.org. We gratefully acknowledge Santosh Kesari, MD, PhD, FANA, FAAN chair of department of translational neuro- oncology and neurotherapeutics, and Marlon Saria, MSN, RN, AOCNS®, FAAN clinical nurse specialist, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA; and Albert Lai, MD, PhD, assistant clinical professor, Adult Brain Tumors, UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, for their review of this edition of this publication. This publication is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice and does not provide advice on treatments or conditions for individual patients. All health and treatment decisions must be made in consultation with your physician(s), utilizing your specific medical information. Inclusion in this publication is not a recommendation of any product, treatment, physician or hospital. COPYRIGHT © 2017 ABTA REPRODUCTION WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION IS PROHIBITED AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION Meningioma INTRODUCTION Although meningiomas are considered a type of primary brain tumor, they do not grow from brain tissue itself, but instead arise from the meninges, three thin layers of tissue covering the brain and spinal cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Subarachnoid Trabeculae: a Comprehensive Review of Their Embryology, Histology, Morphology, and Surgical Significance Martin M
    Literature Review Subarachnoid Trabeculae: A Comprehensive Review of Their Embryology, Histology, Morphology, and Surgical Significance Martin M. Mortazavi1,2, Syed A. Quadri1,2, Muhammad A. Khan1,2, Aaron Gustin3, Sajid S. Suriya1,2, Tania Hassanzadeh4, Kian M. Fahimdanesh5, Farzad H. Adl1,2, Salman A. Fard1,2, M. Asif Taqi1,2, Ian Armstrong1,2, Bryn A. Martin1,6, R. Shane Tubbs1,7 Key words - INTRODUCTION: Brain is suspended in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled sub- - Arachnoid matter arachnoid space by subarachnoid trabeculae (SAT), which are collagen- - Liliequist membrane - Microsurgical procedures reinforced columns stretching between the arachnoid and pia maters. Much - Subarachnoid trabeculae neuroanatomic research has been focused on the subarachnoid cisterns and - Subarachnoid trabecular membrane arachnoid matter but reported data on the SAT are limited. This study provides a - Trabecular cisterns comprehensive review of subarachnoid trabeculae, including their embryology, Abbreviations and Acronyms histology, morphologic variations, and surgical significance. CSDH: Chronic subdural hematoma - CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid METHODS: A literature search was conducted with no date restrictions in DBC: Dural border cell PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane, and Research Gate. DL: Diencephalic leaf Terms for the search included but were not limited to subarachnoid trabeculae, GAG: Glycosaminoglycan subarachnoid trabecular membrane, arachnoid mater, subarachnoid trabeculae LM: Liliequist membrane ML: Mesencephalic leaf embryology, subarachnoid trabeculae histology, and morphology. Articles with a PAC: Pia-arachnoid complex high likelihood of bias, any study published in nonpopular journals (not indexed PPAS: Potential pia-arachnoid space in PubMed or MEDLINE), and studies with conflicting data were excluded. SAH: Subarachnoid hemorrhage SAS: Subarachnoid space - RESULTS: A total of 1113 articles were retrieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Meninges Neuroscience Fundamentals > Regional Neuroscience > Regional Neuroscience
    Spinal Meninges Neuroscience Fundamentals > Regional Neuroscience > Regional Neuroscience SPINAL MENINGES GENERAL ANATOMY Meningeal Layers From outside to inside • Dura mater • Arachnoid mater • Pia mater Meningeal spaces From outside to inside • Epidural (above the dura) - See: epidural hematoma and spinal cord compression from epidural abscess • Subdural (below the dura) - See: subdural hematoma • Subarachnoid (below the arachnoid mater) - See: subarachnoid hemorrhage Spinal canal Key Anatomy • Vertebral body (anteriorly) • Vertebral arch (posteriorly). • Vertebral foramen within the vertebral arch. MENINGEAL LAYERS 1 / 4 • Dura mater forms a thick ring within the spinal canal. • The dural root sheath (aka dural root sleeve) is the dural investment that follows nerve roots into the intervertebral foramen. • The arachnoid mater runs underneath the dura (we lose sight of it under the dural root sheath). • The pia mater directly adheres to the spinal cord and nerve roots, and so it takes the shape of those structures. MENINGEAL SPACES • The epidural space forms external to the dura mater, internal to the vertebral foramen. • The subdural space lies between the dura and arachnoid mater layers. • The subarachnoid space lies between the arachnoid and pia mater layers. CRANIAL VS SPINAL MENINGES  Cranial Meninges • Epidural is a potential space, so it's not a typical disease site unless in the setting of high pressure middle meningeal artery rupture or from traumatic defect. • Subdural is a potential space but bridging veins (those that pass from the subarachnoid space into the dural venous sinuses) can tear, so it is a common site of hematoma. • Subarachnoid space is an actual space and is a site of hemorrhage and infection, for example.
    [Show full text]
  • The Choroid Plexus: a Comprehensive Review of Its History, Anatomy, Function, Histology, Embryology, and Surgical Considerations
    Childs Nerv Syst (2014) 30:205–214 DOI 10.1007/s00381-013-2326-y REVIEW PAPER The choroid plexus: a comprehensive review of its history, anatomy, function, histology, embryology, and surgical considerations Martin M. Mortazavi & Christoph J. Griessenauer & Nimer Adeeb & Aman Deep & Reza Bavarsad Shahripour & Marios Loukas & Richard Isaiah Tubbs & R. Shane Tubbs Received: 30 September 2013 /Accepted: 11 November 2013 /Published online: 28 November 2013 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Keywords Choroid plexus . Anatomy . Neurosurgery . Introduction The role of the choroid plexus in cerebrospinal Hydrocephalus fluid production has been identified for more than a century. Over the years, more intensive studies of this structure has lead to a better understanding of the functions, including brain Introduction immunity, protection, absorption, and many others. Here, we review the macro- and microanatomical structure of the Around the walls of the ventricles, folds of pia mater form choroid plexus in addition to its function and embryology. vascularized layers named choroid plexus. This vasculature Method The literature was searched for articles and textbooks along with the overlying ependymal lining of the ventricles for data related to the history, anatomy, physiology, histology, forms the tela choroidea. Sometimes, however, the term embryology, potential functions, and surgical implications of choroid plexus is used to describe the entire structure [1]. The the choroid plexus. All were gathered and summarized narrow cleft, to which the choroids plexus is attached in the comprehensively. ventricles, is defined as the choroidal fissure. [2] The discovery Conclusion We summarize the literature regarding the choroid of the choroid plexus is attributed to Herophilus, who named it plexus and its surgical implications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Pia Mater in Controlling Brain and Spinal Cord Intraparenchymal Pressure Daniel Harwell MD; Justin Louis Gibson; Richard D
    The Role of the Pia Mater in Controlling Brain and Spinal Cord Intraparenchymal Pressure Daniel Harwell MD; Justin Louis Gibson; Richard D. Fessler MD; Jeffrey R. Holtz P.A.-C.; David B. Pettigrew MS PhD; Charles Kuntz, IV MD Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati and The Mayfield Clinic Introduction Conclusions Figure 2 Several multicenter randomized control trials have shown that decompression with The simulated edema model has durotomy/duroplasty significantly differential effects on brain and decreases intracranial pressure (ICP), spinal cord IPP. Brain IPP increased improving mortality. Currently, only slightly, consistent with the decompressive craniectomy combined with Figure 1 augmentative duraplasty is widely model that increased intracranial performed and is recommended by most pressure is primarily due to authors. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the effectiveness of constraints imposed by the cranium decompression of the spinal cord by and dura mater. In contrast, spinal Peak IPP, Final IPP after 5 days, Post- meningoplasty. cord IPP increased substantially. piotomy IPP. Key: left frontal (FL), right Piotomy immediately and frontal (FR), left parietal (PL), right parietal Methods (PR) lobes. Cervical (C) and thoracic (T) dramatically reduced spinal cord The supratentorial brain and spinal cord spinal cord. Bars: mean + standard were carefully removed from four fresh IPP. These data are consistent with deviation. * indicates statistical significance cadavers. The dura and arachnoid mater the hypothesis that intramedullary compared with FL, FR, PL, and PR peak investments were removed. ICP monitors IPP. were placed bilaterally in the frontal and pressure is primarily due to An example of one representative parietal lobes, as well as the cervical and constraints imposed by the pia preparation at baseline (A) and after (B) 5 Figure 3 thoracic spinal cord.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Regulation of Forebrain Development and Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells
    Molecular regulation of forebrain development and neural stem/progenitor cells Janne Hakanen Department of Veterinary Biosciences Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Helsinki and Developmental Biology Program Institute of Biotechnology and Integrative life science doctoral program (ILS) University of Helsinki Academic dissertation To be presented for public examination with the permission of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Helsinki in the Lecture Hall 7 (Latokartanonkaari 7- B-Building) on 24th of October, 2014, at 12 noon. Supervisor Marjo Salminen, Docent Department of Veterinary Biosciences University of Helsinki Pre-reviewers Juha Partanen, Professor Department of Biosciences University of Helsinki Claudio Rivera, PhD, Research director Neuroscience Center University of Helsinki Opponent Dan Lindholm, Professor Institute of Biomedicine and Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research University of Helsinki Custodian Jyrki Kukkonen, Professor Department of Veterinary Biosciences University of Helsinki ISBN 978-951-51-0135-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-51-0136-5 (pdf) ISSN 2342-3161 (print) ISSN 2342-317X (online) Table of contents List of original publications Abstract Abbreviations 1. Review of the literature....................................................................................................................1 1. 1 Development of mouse forebrain................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Forebrain germinal zones.......................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]