DOCSLIB.ORG

An Unpublished Letter of M.A. Bakunin to R.Solger

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Unpublished Letter of M.A. Bakunin to R.Solger Robert M. Cutler AN UNPUBLISHED LETTER OF M.A. BAKUNIN TO R. SOLGER* After Mikhail Aleksandrovich Bakunin escaped from Siberian exile in 1861, he circumnavigated the globe en route to London, where he joined his friends A.I. Herzen and N.P. Ogarev. En route Bakunin travelled by boat from Yokohama to San Francisco, traversed the isthmus of Panama, and sojourned in New York and Boston before reembarking for England. Four decades ago Hecht wrote that there "is little record of Bakunin's stay in America",1 but Avrich has since established the general contours and many details of that record.2 An unpublished letter of Bakunin to Reinhold Solger, which lies among Solger's papers in the Library of Congress, sheds further light on Bakunin's activities in the United States in late 1861.3 Bakunin met Solger in Zurich in * I wish to thank Professor Margaret Dorsch for assisting in the decipherment of the manuscript and for suggesting alternative renderings in the translation. 1 David Hecht, Russian Radicals Look to America, 1825-1894 (Cambridge, Mass., 1947), p. 56. 2 Paul Avrich, "Bakunin and the United States", International Review of Social History, XXIV (1979), pp. 320-40, adds new material to Max Nettlau's account of Bakunin's passage through the United States, in The Life of Michael Bakounine. Michael Bakunin: Eine Biogra- p/u'e,3volsin2(London, 1896-99), l,pp. 139-40. Avrich also expands upon Hecht's treatment (which is from the standpoint of intellectual history) of the sojourn's influence upon the subsequent development of Bakunin's political thought, and he provides a detailed discussion of the influence of Bakunin's writings upon the development of collectivist socialist move­ ments in the United States towards the end of the nineteenth century. The fullest reminiscence of Bakunin's sojourn in Boston by a contemporary is the memoir of Martin P. Kennard, "A Russian Anarchist Visits Boston in 1861: Text of an Account Written Some Twenty Years After, Edited by O. Handlin", New England Quarterly, XV (1942), pp. 104-09. Kennard gave Bakunin, as a parting gift, an autograph of George Washington. Later in the decade Bakunin in turn presented this to a sister who visited him in Italy, and it lies now in a Soviet archive: see B.P. Koz'min (ed.), Gertsen, Ogarev i ikh okruzhenie: Rukopisi, perepiska i dokumenty, compiled by L.E. Barsukova et al., Biulleten' Gosudarstvennogo literaturnogo muzeia 5 (Moscow, 1940), p. 24. 3 M. Bakunin to R. Solger, 29 November 1861, Reinhold Solger Papers, Box 1, Folder "Correspondence 1854-1867", Library of Congress, Manuscript Division, Washington, D.C. Reinhold Solger (1817-1866) was born in Stettin, Prussia, and prepared for an academic career through study in Halle and Greifswald. He fled to Switzerland following the defeat of the revolutionary army in Baden in 1848 which he had joined, and went to the United States in 1853. In the United States, Solger won prizes for a poem in honor of Schiller at the 1859 centenary and for a novel on German-American life; he delivered the Lowell Lectures at International Review of Social History, XXXIII (1988), pp. 212-217 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.234, on 26 Sep 2021 at 10:50:13, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000008749 BAKUNIN TO SOLGER 213 1843, and a letter from Bakunin to Solger dated 14 October 1844 has already been published.4 After a short stay in Philadelphia upon arrival in the United States, Solger moved to Boston for several years before settling finally in New York. He was therefore able to put Bakunin in touch with progressive circles in Boston, which is the city of the letter's origin. We learn from the present letter that in Boston Bakunin met the elder Josiah Quincy, a former president of Harvard whose grandson Josiah P. Quincy was one of the Boston literati who sponsored Solger's lecture series on contemporary European affairs. Also we learn that in Boston Bakunin saw Karol Forster, another old acquaintance from the early 1840s in Paris. Although Forster's name does not appear in Bakunin's correspondence from that time, Forster's published writings show that he moved in the same emigre community centered on the neighborhood of the Palais-Royal.5 It is Harvard in both 1857 and 1859. Much of his income was derived from public lecture series and international-affairs journalism. Thus a journalist, novelist, poet, and gifted public speaker, Solger devoted his considerable talents to the cause of the Union against the Confederacy and on behalf of Abraham Lincoln's party. In recognition of this, the latter appointed him Assistant Registrar of the U.S. Treasury. 4 The 1844 letter first appeared in Russian translation, in M.A. Bakunin, Sobraniesochinenii i pisem, edited by Iu.M. Steklov, 4 vols (Moscow, 1934-36), 3, pp. 236-38. (Steklov planned to publish a complete twelve-volume edition of Bakunin's Sobranie sochinenii i pisem but was prevented from this by enthusiasts of the Stalin school of historiography, who exiled him to the West Siberian labor camp where he died. Volumes 5 and 6, which had been prepared for the printer in Moscow in the mid-1930s, were suppressed before publication, and work in progress on subsequent volumes halted. According to an archivist formerly employed at a major Moscow library, all these materials should lie in the currently closed archive of the Izdatel'stvo vsesoiuznogo obshchestva politkatorzhan i ssyl'no-poselentsev, which is conversed in the Tsentral'nyi gosudarstvennyi arkhiv oktiabr'skoi revoliutsii and for which an index exists in the form of an unpublished diplomnaia rabota defended by a certain Aleksandr Iakushkin at the Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi istorik-arkhivnyi institut in or about 1966.) The original German text of Bakunin's 1844 letter to Solger has been published, with a useful commentary, by Edmund Silberner, "Uber einige unveroffentlichte Briefe Bakunins", Jahrbiicher fiir Ge­ schichte Osteuropas, VIII (1960), pp. 79-82. 5 However, he had little sympathy for its more radical circles. In Charles de Forster, Du Royaume a I'Empire (1848-1852): Etudes politiques etphilosophiques (Paris, 1854), pp. 108, 176-78, 264, 285, he criticized Feuerbach's adepts, equated socialism with anarchism, and attacked Proudhon's espousal of atheism. Forster preferred the existence of any authority to its absence, and monarchy to any other form of authority. Acknowledging that "Russia represents the monarchical principle in all its integrity", he counted upon it for the possibility of reconstituting a Polish state consonant with his own political preferences, including first and foremost the guarantee of aristocratic privileges. See France et Europe: Six lettres tirees du portefeuille d'un hommepolitique (Berlin, 1849), pp. 18, 36, 46-48, 55-56, 71-72, and esp. p. 64; quotation at p. 62. This anonymously published brochure is attributed to Forster in Karol Estreicher (ed.), Bibliografiapolska XlXstulecia, 2nd ed., 12 vols by 1979, (Krakow, 1959- ), 7, pp. 173-74; and also at p. iv of " Wydawnictwo polskie w Berline", an advertising postface to Sprawa polska ze stanowiska europejskiego, compiled with a preface by Karol Forster, Teka Narodowa, Pisma historyczno-politiczne 2 (Berlin, 1872). In this 1872 publication Forster also Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.234, on 26 Sep 2021 at 10:50:13, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000008749 214 ROBERT M. CUTLER not clear whether Solger and Forster met in Paris at this time, but they did encounter one another during the revolutions of 1848-49, when the latter was in the camp of General Mieroslawski, for whom Solger served as translator and interpreter.6 We do not know why Forster should have been travelling through Boston at this time, but the remarkable coincidence of Bakunin's meeting with him (no doubt through Snelling, whom Avrich describes as "an avid partisan of Polish emancipation"7) must be accounted a simple matter of course in his remarkable life: in Yokohama, after having left Siberia, Bakunin ran into his old comrade Wilhelm Heine from the Dresden insurrection;8 and in Boston, an Austrian officer who had con­ veyed Bakunin to prison from the Prague court house after he had been condemned to death, encountered him on the premises of his friend Ken- nard's business.9 This letter is dated 29 November 1861, a Friday. From New York upon his arrival the following Tuesday, 3 December, Bakunin wrote to London a letter addressed to Herzen and Ogarev that was signed also by Solger, who had known Herzen in Paris the 1840s, and by Friedrich Kapp, Solger's longtime friend and associate then in New York, who had been tutor to Herzen's son and was also himself a German "forty-eighter".10 reprinted, in Polish translation, Bakunin's long 1862 article "Russkim, Pol'skim i vsiem slavianskim druz'iam", originally published as a Supplement to Kolokol, nos 122-23 (15 February 1862), pp. 1021-28, apparently using the French translation of the brochure as the basis for the Polish translation. Compare M.A. Bakounine, A mes amis russes el polonais (Leipzig, 1862); and M.A. Bakunin, "Do moich przyjaciol Rosyan i Polakdw", in Sprawa polska zestanowiska europejskiego, pp. 138-51. For Forster's criticism of that program, see his "Do czytelnika", in ibid., pp. ix-x. 6 Friedrich Kapp, "Reinhold Solger", in Kapp, Aus und uber Amerika: Thatsachen und Erlebnisse, 2 vols (Berlin, 1876), 1, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State and Local Immigration Regulation in the United States Before 1882
    BENJAMIN J. KLEBANER STATE AND LOCAL IMMIGRATION REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES BEFORE 1882 The absence of significant federal regulation in the area of immigration legislation until 1882 1 no more denotes a laissez-faire approach in this area than in many other aspects of American economic life. For many generations Congress had left the task of regulating the immigrant stream to the states and localities.2 The first general federal law (1882) is best understood in the context of antecedent activity on the local level. Eventually most of the seaboard states, including many without an important passenger traffic, enacted statutes dealing with immi- gration. Table I presents a brief outline of their essential features. After a consideration of certain aspects of the provisions of these laws, their administration in the major seaports will be surveyed. It will then be shown how the increasing opposition by business inter- ests to state legislation, culminating in decisions by the Supreme Court declaring such regulation unconstitutional, eventually paved the way for the 1882 Act of Congress. I. THE STATUTORY BACKGROUND Nine of the thirteen colonies reflected in their enactments the desire to protect the community from the burden of foreigners likely to 1 Federal space and sanitation requirements, however, date back to 1819. Federal legis- lation is conveniently compiled in U.S. Immigration Commission, Reports, vol. XXXIX (Washington, 1911). Cf. John Higham, Strangers in the Land (New Brunswick, N. J.; Rutgers University Press, 1955), p. 44. This article does not discuss legislation enacted in a number of states which barred foreign convicts. - The author acknowledges with gratitude the many helpful suggestions made by Professor Carter Goodrich, who super- vised his doctoral thesis "Public Poor Relief in America, 1790-1860" (Columbia University, 1952) from which much of the material for this article is taken.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
    NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY GENERAL ISSUES RELIGIONS AND PHILOSOPHY FIORANI, ELEONORA. Friedrich Engels e il materialismo dialettico. Feltrinelli Editore, Milano 1971. 272 pp. L. 3000. Engels's Anti-Diihring, Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy and Dialectics of Nature are the writings most elaborated upon by the author, who, refuting efforts to draw a line between Marx and Engels as regards their later followers, stresses Engels's contribution to Marxism. She argues that his contribution to dialectical materialism is still important for a clarification of topical issues, and makes some comments on the vicissitudes of diamat in the USSR. A chronology of Engels's life and an annotated bibliography are appended. HARTMANN, KLAUS. Die Marxsche Theorie. Eine philosophische Unter- suchung zu den Hauptschriften. Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin 1970. xii, 593 pp. DM 78.00. The author of this learned study undertakes a re-appraisal of Marx's theory from a purely philosophical angle. He criticizes Popper's theses (and lack of understanding of Hegelianism), but his own refutation of Marxian views brings him closer to Popper's. It is denied that a dialectical process going on in reality could justifiably be made to fit in the chain of historical necessity. Besides Marx's more philosophical writings all his major works, especially Capital, come up for discussion. Interesting are the comments on Marxist and non-Marxist evaluations of our time (Sartre, Habermas etc.). WILDERMUTH, ARMIN. Marx und die Verwirklichung der Philosophic. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag 1970. xii, 852 pp. (in 2 vols.) Hfl. 90.00. "The synthetic unity [of inter-subjective and object-related communications] constitutes the indissoluble process of the 'social movement', the total process of human self-reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • University of New South Wales 2005 UNIVERSITY of NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Project Report Sheet
    BÜRGERTUM OHNE RAUM: German Liberalism and Imperialism, 1848-1884, 1918-1943. Matthew P Fitzpatrick A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of New South Wales 2005 UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Project Report Sheet Surname or Family name: Fitzpatrick First name: Matthew Other name/s: Peter Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD. School: History Faculty: Arts Title: Bürgertum Ohne Raum: German Liberalism and Imperialism 1848-1884, 1918-1943. Abstract This thesis situates the emergence of German imperialist theory and praxis during the nineteenth century within the context of the ascendancy of German liberalism. It also contends that imperialism was an integral part of a liberal sense of German national identity. It is divided into an introduction, four parts and a set of conclusions. The introduction is a methodological and theoretical orientation. It offers an historiographical overview and places the thesis within the broader historiographical context. It also discusses the utility of post-colonial theory and various theories of nationalism and nation-building. Part One examines the emergence of expansionism within liberal circles prior to and during the period of 1848/ 49. It examines the consolidation of expansionist theory and political practice, particularly as exemplified in the Frankfurt National Assembly and the works of Friedrich List. Part Two examines the persistence of imperialist theorising and praxis in the post-revolutionary era. It scrutinises the role of liberal associations, civil society, the press and the private sector in maintaining expansionist energies up until the 1884 decision to establish state-protected colonies. Part Three focuses on the cultural transmission of imperialist values through the sciences, media and fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Author Interview--David T. Dixon (Radical Warrior) Part 2
    H-CivWar Author Interview--David T. Dixon (Radical Warrior) Part 2 Discussion published by Niels Eichhorn on Thursday, September 24, 2020 Hello H-CivWar Readers: Today we feature the second part of our interview with David T. Dixon to talk about his new book Radical Warrior: August Willich’s Journey from German Revolutionary to Union General, which came out with the University of Tennessee Press. Part 1 Obviously, I completely agree with your attitude about giving more attention to European experiences of European immigrants. At the same time, Willich seems torn in Europe. In part he is something of an ideologue but he does have his military background and much of his 1848 work is military. Do you think of him more as a soldier or as a political reformer in Europe, especially in 1848? DTD: Willich certainly had a difficult time breaking away for his military career, but by 1847 he was so utterly consumed with the plight of working class people and the disregard of their welfare by the monarchs of Europe, that he dedicated himself to radical political and social change for the rest of his life. I see him as a far-left activist who believed that violent revolution in Europe by an armed citizenry was the only feasible path to a more just and equitable society. So, in that sense, his military training and skills, combined with strong leadership talents, made him well-suited for the rebellion that took place in 1848 and 1849. So, he sounds very similar to Karl Marx. How did the two get along with each other? DTD: Not well.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unpublished Letter of M.A. Bakunin to R.Solger
    Robert M. Cutler AN UNPUBLISHED LETTER OF M.A. BAKUNIN TO R. SOLGER* After Mikhail Aleksandrovich Bakunin escaped from Siberian exile in 1861, he circumnavigated the globe en route to London, where he joined his friends A.I. Herzen and N.P. Ogarev. En route Bakunin travelled by boat from Yokohama to San Francisco, traversed the isthmus of Panama, and sojourned in New York and Boston before reembarking for England. Four decades ago Hecht wrote that there "is little record of Bakunin's stay in America",1 but Avrich has since established the general contours and many details of that record.2 An unpublished letter of Bakunin to Reinhold Solger, which lies among Solger's papers in the Library of Congress, sheds further light on Bakunin's activities in the United States in late 1861.3 Bakunin met Solger in Zurich in * I wish to thank Professor Margaret Dorsch for assisting in the decipherment of the manuscript and for suggesting alternative renderings in the translation. 1 David Hecht, Russian Radicals Look to America, 1825-1894 (Cambridge, Mass., 1947), p. 56. 2 Paul Avrich, "Bakunin and the United States", International Review of Social History, XXIV (1979), pp. 320-40, adds new material to Max Nettlau's account of Bakunin's passage through the United States, in The Life of Michael Bakounine. Michael Bakunin: Eine Biogra- p/u'e,3volsin2(London, 1896-99), l,pp. 139-40. Avrich also expands upon Hecht's treatment (which is from the standpoint of intellectual history) of the sojourn's influence upon the subsequent development of Bakunin's political thought, and he provides a detailed discussion of the influence of Bakunin's writings upon the development of collectivist socialist move­ ments in the United States towards the end of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartas a Un Buscador De Sí Mismo
    Todos hemos sentido alguna vez la llegada de un tiempo en el que todo tiembla y en el que necesitamos poner en cuestión cada aspecto de nuestra vida. Las convicciones políticas supuestamente asentadas se destruyen para crear otras nuevas, las normas sociales asumidas se revisan y se lucha por otras distintas, las metas existenciales se transforman de modo radical. Precisamente durante este proceso vital Harrison G. O. Blake escribe por primera vez a H. D. Thoreau para solicitar su consejo y su orientación hacia una vida más verdadera. Se inicia así una correspondencia intensa y reveladora, tan íntima como filosófica, que para muchos constituye el más claro equivalente moderno de las Cartas a Lucilio de Séneca. De carta en carta y durante trece años Thoreau le habla a Blake de cómo ganarse la vida, del coraje, del sexo, del trabajo, del amor, de la naturaleza, de la libertad, de la sociedad, de la política, de la moral, de la alimentación, de la disidencia, de la religión, de la soledad y de un tiempo pleno, donde la construcción de la subjetividad se labra a golpes de una desorientación gozosa, libre y salvaje. Décadas después de la muerte de Thoreau, un Blake anciano confesaba seguir leyendo y releyendo estas cartas, como si buscara aún en ellas una verdad esencial y recóndita: «Y, sin embargo, sé que estas cartas siguen viajando en el correo, que en cierto sentido aún no me han llegado, y probablemente no lo harán mientras viva. De hecho, puede decirse que estas cartas están desde siempre dirigidas a quien mejor pueda leerlas».
    [Show full text]
  • Bakunin and the United States
    PA UL A VRICH BAKUNIN AND THE UNITED STATES "MIKHAIL ALEKSANDROVICH BAKUNIN is in San Francisco", announced the front page of Herzen's Kolokol in November 1861. "HE IS FREE! Bakunin left Siberia via Japan and is on his way to England. We joyfully bring this news to all Bakunin's friends."1 Arrested in Chemnitz in May 1849, Bakunin had been extradited to Russia in 1851 and, after six years in the Peter-Paul and Schlusselburg fortresses, condemned to per- petual banishment in Siberia. On June 17, 1861, however, he began his dramatic escape. Setting out from Irkutsk, he sailed down the Amur to Nikolaevsk, where he boarded a government vessel plying the Siberian coast. Once at sea, he transferred to an American sailing ship, the Vickery, which was trading in Japanese ports, and reached Japan on August 16th. A month later, on September 17th, he sailed from Yokohama on another American vessel, the Carrington, bound for San Francisco.2 He arrived four weeks later,3 completing, in Herzen's description, "the very longest escape in a geographical sense".4 Bakunin was forty-seven years old. He had spent the past twelve years in prison and exile, and only fourteen years of life — extremely active life, to be sure — lay before him. He had returned like a ghost from the past, "risen from the dead" as he wrote to Herzen and Ogarev from San Francisco.5 His sojourn in America, one of the least well-known episodes of his career, lasted two months, from October 15th, when he landed in San Francisco, to 1 Kolokol (London), November 22, 1861.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and Social Movements: the Forty-Eighters in the Civil War
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES LEADERSHIP AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: THE FORTY-EIGHTERS IN THE CIVIL WAR Christian Dippel Stephan Heblich Working Paper 24656 http://www.nber.org/papers/w24656 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2018 We thank the editor and two referees for very helpful suggestions, as well as Daron Acemoglu, Sascha Becker, Toman Barsbai, Jean-Paul Carvalho, Dora Costa, James Feigenbaum, Raquel Fernandez, Paola Giuliano, Walter Kamphoefner, Michael Haines, Tarek Hassan, Saumitra Jha, Matthew Kahn, Naomi Lamoreaux, Gary Libecap, Zach Sauers, Jakob Schneebacher, Elisabeth Perlman, Nico Voigtländer, John Wallis, Romain Wacziarg, Gavin Wright, Guo Xu, and seminar participants at UCLA, U Calgary, Bristol, the NBER DAE and POL meetings, the EHA meetings, and the UCI IMBS conference for valuable comments. We thank David Cruse, Andrew Dale, Karene Daniel, Andrea di Miceli, Jake Kantor, Zach Lewis, Josh Mimura, Rose Niermeijer, Sebastian Ottinger, Anton Sobolev, Gwyneth Teo, and Alper Yesek for excellent research assistance. We thank Michael Haines for sharing data. We thank Yannick Dupraz and Andreas Ferrara for data-sharing and joint efforts in collecting the Civil War soldier and regiments data. We thank John Wallis and Jeremy Darrington for helpful advice in locating sub-county voting data for the period, although we ultimately could not use it. Dippel acknowledges financial support for this project from the UCLA Center of Global Management, the UCLA Price Center and the UCLA Burkle Center. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich Franz Karl Hecker, 1811–1881 Part II Kevin Kurdylo
    Volume 19 No 2 • Summer 2010 Friedrich Franz Karl Hecker, 1811–1881 Part II Kevin Kurdylo As the 150th anniversary of the begin- was convinced that the contract of ning of the Civil War approaches, we the Union could not be broken by a will examine the role German-born minority of states,2 and he believed immigrants played during that histori- firmly that each man should take cal era. The first section of this article on Friedrich Hecker (Spring 2010) his place according to his abilities. examines his career in Europe before Because he felt Sigel was the more he came to this country. This section experienced and competent soldier, focuses on his activities in America. he was prepared to do his part as an infantryman if need be. There were ealizing that Lincoln’s elec- others, including some of his promi- tion as president meant an nent German-American friends, end to compromise on the who felt Hecker should lead his own Rissue of slavery, southern states began troops. to secede from the Union in the first In May of 1861, without Hecker’s months of 1861. Propelled by the knowledge (though capitalizing on same strong beliefs he held during his reputation), recruitment had be- the Revolution of 1848, the fifty-year- gun in Chicago for what was called Colonel Friedrich Hecker old Hecker answered Lincoln’s call the 1st Hecker Jäger [Hunter] Regi- to arms, and he crossed the Missis- ment, later known as the 24th Illinois and not enough privates, and a severe sippi River by rowboat to join Francis Volunteers, and Hecker was offered discipline problem, the latter exac- (Franz) Sigel’s 3rd Missouri Volunteer command of this regiment with the erbated by friction between Hecker Regiment—as a private.1 Hecker rank of colonel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakunin Collected Works Collection 1823-1876
    Bakunin Collected Works Collection 1823-1876 International Institute of Social History Cruquiusweg 31 1019 AT Amsterdam The Netherlands hdl:10622/ARCH04384 © IISH Amsterdam 2020 Bakunin Collected Works Collection 1823-1876 Table of contents Bakunin Collected Works Collection..................................................................................................3 Context............................................................................................................................................... 3 Content and Structure........................................................................................................................3 Access and Use.................................................................................................................................4 Allied Material.....................................................................................................................................5 Inventaire............................................................................................................................................5 Lettres: correspondance à caractère personnel.......................................................................... 5 Ecrits: articles, brochures, livres, lettres ouvertes et discours...................................................90 Divers: textes personnels et documents administratifs, notes sur la philosophie et l'histoire, documents isolés......................................................................................................................120
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of US Immigration Regulation in Nineteenth-Century New York
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 5-2015 Protecting the Stranger: The Origins of US Immigration Regulation in Nineteenth-Century New York Brendan P. O'Malley Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1079 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] PROTECTING THE STRANGER: THE ORIGINS OF US IMMIGRATION REGULATION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY NEW YORK by BRENDAN P. O’MALLEY A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2015 i © 2015 BRENDAN P. O’MALLEY All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy DAVID NASAW __________________ ________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee HELENA ROSENBLATT __________________ ________________________________ Date Executive Officer THOMAS KESSNER GERALD MARKOWITZ ANNA O. LAW JOHN TORPEY Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract PROTECTING THE STRANGER: THE ORIGINS OF US IMMIGRATION REGULATION IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY NEW YORK by BRENDAN P. O’MALLEY From 1847 to 1890, a state authority—not a federal one—oversaw the entry of most immigrants arriving in the United States. The New York State Board of the Commissioners of Emigration supervised the landing of over eight million newcomers in nation’s busiest entry point, the Port of New York, during the second half of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]