Flowmeter Data Validation and Reconstruction Methodology to Provide the Annual Efficiency of a Water Transport Network: the ATLL Case Study in Catalonia” by J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Drink. Water Eng. Sci. Discuss., 6, C26–C31, 2013 Drinking Water www.drink-water-eng-sci-discuss.net/6/C26/2013/ Engineering and Science © Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under Discussions the Creative Commons Attribute 3.0 License. Interactive comment on “Flowmeter data validation and reconstruction methodology to provide the annual efficiency of a water transport network: the ATLL case study in Catalonia” by J. Quevedo et al. J. Quevedo et al. [email protected] Received and published: 8 May 2013 First of all, thank you for your comment about this paper. All your comments are an- swered below. First of all, comments are numbered and then the appropriate answer is presented: 1. In this paper, measured flows entering a network are compared to measured flows leaving the network. Flow measurements inaccuracies are corrected. Unclear is how this was done. Also, it is not clear why this was done. C26 The flow measurements inaccuracies are not corrected but estimated using the equa- tion 3 of model residual and the equation 5 using confidence intervals. After measure- ments inaccuracies have been estimated, they are taken into account to estimate the inaccuracies in the evaluation of the network efficiency. 2. The example of fig 7 shows that even if 6 months of wrong data are present, there is a way to correct those. What the value of that exercise is, is quite unclear. This example shows that the time series of the upstream flowmeter had an operating problem during almost half a year. But, the validation/reconstruction method proposed is able to detect and reconstruct wrong flowmeter data using the downstream flowmeter data. 3. The suggestion of the hydraulic performance of a network as the difference between the volume of water delivered measured by billing flow meters and the volume of water metering the system is not correct. This is the unaccounted for water, and it is not equal to water loss. It is corrected in the new version as follows: “..., the hydraulic performance measured using the ratio between the volume of water delivered (VAM) (which is computed from two sources, the measured by billing flowme- ters and the unmeasured billed consumptions) and the volume of water entering the network (VED) is also computed.”. 4. Figures 1-4 have no added value, they can be explained in text. We think figures 1 to 4 even though they not add information, they could be useful to better understand the proposed methodology used and the topology of the studied network. 5. Fig. 5 is incomprehensible. The problem with this figure is the network size that makes it unreadable without in- C27 creasing the size in a considerable way. However, we think that it is important to keep in the paper to appreciate the network size. In any case, in the new version of the paper its quality has been improved. 6. The text to Fig 6a is incorrect. The reviewer is right. The text has been corrected in the revised version of the paper: The previous text: “Figure 6a presents the upstream and downstream flowmeter daily time series. It shows with a circle the outliers which have been detected and isolated by the time series models of upstream and downstream flowmeters.” has been replaced by: “Figure 6a presents the upstream and downstream flowmeter raw data” and in the text: “Figure 6c presents again the upstream and downstream flowmeter daily time series. It shows with a circle the outliers which have been replaced by es- timated data obtained from time series models of upstream and downstream flowme- ters.” the word “again” is removed. The legend in figure 7 has been corrected too. 7. The methodology in 2.2 describes how to calculate the network efficiency. In the results, this value is not given. We present the results of two sectors and the network efficiency: a.- For the first ex- ample, composed of one input flowmeter and three output flowmeters: The confidence interval of the hydraulic efficiency corresponding to this sector is [98.7%, 98.9%] b.- The second sample sector is composed of one upstream flowmeter and one down- stream flowmeter: The confidence interval of the hydraulic efficiency corresponding to this sector is [104.7%, 108.5%]. All these results are reported in page 8. 8. There is lack of international references to work on water meter inaccuracies and C28 calculating unaccounted for water and water loss. This has been corrected in the revised version of the paper. Now, an interesting and re- cent reference of Allan Lambert and Richard Taylor (corresponding to the chapter 3 of the Water New Zealand: Water Loss Guidelines (2010)) has been included. This chap- ter is dedicated to include errors and uncertainties in Water Balance using confidence limits in a way similar to our approach. Allan Lambert and Richard Taylor, “Water Loss Guide- lines” and presented also in Water Loss Conference 2010: http://www.waternz.org.nz/Folder?Action=View%20File&Folder_id=101&File=100503_waterloss_guidelines.pdf Finally, the attached version of this paper contains all these corrections. Figures 5 and 7 of the paper are attached also separately. Please also note the supplement to this comment: http://www.drink-water-eng-sci-discuss.net/6/C26/2013/dwesd-6-C26-2013- supplement.pdf Interactive comment on Drink. Water Eng. Sci. Discuss., 6, 79, 2013. C29 D7FT00101 E7FT00202 L9FT00601 E7FT00203 D7FT00102 EL BRUC K8FT00301 HOSTALETS COLLBATÌ ZONA 1 ZONA 7 ZONA 6 ZONA 4 K8FT00303 LA GARRIGA I6FT01N02 Bigues L9FT00201 L9FT00301 CAN LLONG LA VIOLONA I6FT01N01 AMETLLA VELL N9FT01001 K8FT00302 STA. EULALIA Sta. Eulalia E7FT00204 L9FT00202 L9FT00501 N9FT01002 I6FT01N03 E7FT00102 I6FT06701 L9FT00302 Arraona 3 N9FT01401 LLEDONERS L9FT00701 M9FT00103 M9FT00301 E7FT00206 E7FT00205 E7FT00201 K8FT00501 CARDEDEU Mas d‘En Gall Serra Alta Hostalets CAN SANTACANA E7FT00101 I6FT05901 Arraona 2 ESPARREGUERA 3 MAS DORCA SANTA DIGNA B7FT00401 C8FT00101 C8FT00201 N9FT00101 I6FT03601 M9FT00102 M9FT00104 N9FT01201 Can Feu II C NOVES SAMALS EL MIRADOR I6FT03501 J8FT00101 J8FT00201 M9FT00101 (CAN VOLART) Sant Quirze 4 M9FT00201 I6FT03301 Sant Quirze 3 SENTMENAT CALDES N9FT01301 PLANS CASTELLOLÈ CASTELLOLÈ CARDEDEU D‘ARAU URB PLA LLERONA ST. ANTONI POLIGON I6FT03401 (EL RIGAT) F6FT00201 L8FT00301 N9FT00402 VILAMAJOR Serra Galliners M8FT00601 ESPARREGUERA 2 N9FT01202 I6FT03001 N9FT00403 ST. PERE F6FT00202 K8FT00201 CANOVELLES Sant Quirze 1 K8FT00101 L8FT00204 L8FT00203 CONSUM N9FT01101 K8FT00403 BAIXA I6FT03101 BELLAVISTA REGULADOR Sant Quirze 2 C-168 K8FT00401 K8FT00402 LLINARS - CANOVËS N9FT00801 B7FT00101 PALAU LLIÇA AMUNT LLIÇA AMUNT L8FT00201 J7FT00301 NOU VELL B7FT00201 I6FT00102 N9FT00201 Sabadell M8FT00303 J7FT00201 N9FT00401 C-250 I6FT00101 K8FT00202 M8FT00301 FRANQUESES Terrassa I6FT02L01 PLANS RUBI 2 K7FT071 Palau LA VERNEDA B7FT00202 D‘ARAU POLINYA 3000 LLINARS M8FT00302 F6FT01L01 ABRERA RUBI 1 GRANOLLERS CAN VILALBA CAN CARRERES I6FT001X4 K7FT6601 Palau - trenet F6FT01K01 F6FT00401 I6FT00103 I6FT001X5 I6FT00103 M8FT00201 M8FT00304 A SQRDC M8FT00307 CABALIMETRES MASQUEFA L8FT00101 RETROS I6FT001X3 I6FT001X3 VELL H6FT00201 D6FT00204 F6FT00301 DE SQRDC LA TORRETA M8FT00501 M7FT00201 F6FT00302 E6FT00501 H6FT00101 LLIÇA VALL MPT J6FT03401 Barbera - SQRDC VELL CAN PRATS PTT PIERA M8FT00102 MASQUEFA J7FT00101 C7FT00101 N8FT01001 C7FT00102 D6FT00205 E6FT00502 E6FT00504 K6FT00701 H6FT06501 C-105 L8FT00401 L7FT00302 PD Les Fonts N8FT03801 01FT02N01 POLINYA PAS BLAU Z. ESPORTIVA M8FT00101 --- LLIÇA VALL --- EB SQRDC -- D6FT00201 D6FT00202 D6FT00203 NOU 200 Ajuntament Anaigua Piera L6FT00801 4 CAMINS N 2 I6FT00401 I5FT00101 K7FT00201 D E6FT00505 G6FT03301 01FT00822 E6FT00506 Castellbisbal 2 K7FT00202 L6FT00802 01FT01901 EB C250 L6FT00701 TRES CREUS N8FT07601 E6FT00503 PTLL K6FT00301 L7FT00201 L7FT00202 EB CAN URBASA MESSEGUER G6FT03201 (-) RUBI SANT CUGAT Castellbisbal 1 Can Roses Llobregat (+) ZONA 2 STA. N8FT00801 PARETS PERPETUA E5FT00101 01FT02O01 01FT01L02 MARTORELL 01FT02M01 -- E4FT00101 J5FT00301 J5FT00101 K6FT00401 L7FT00501 00 01FT02H01 01FT01L01 K6FT00501 30 C292 E6FT00101 N 01FT02H02 Reductores C250 D M6FT00501 SANT LLORENÇ K6FT00101 L7FT00601 01FT01246 GELIDA E6FT00102 PD MOLLET D4FT00101 J6FT00201 Vallserrat LA LLAGOSTA L6FT00901 F6FT00101 RIPOLLET M6FT00801 F4FT00201 G6FT07901 VILANOVA CAN COLLET NOU MOLLET E6FT00103 Martorell œ Can Bros C4FT00101 F4FT00101 Prov. Can Brians CAN BRIANS N7 BARBER J5FT00201 G5FT06801 CAN XEC M6FT00901 SANT SADURNÈ CASTELLVÈ ZONA 8 (POLIGON) E5FT00201 S1 N8FT00701 Can Brians PL CASTELLVÈ PENEDES I5FT00201 L6FT03701 VALLROMANES N8FT01101 G5FT00201 A-50 L6FT03702 PD COBEGA CASTELLBISBAL ZONA 3 N8FT00702 L6FT06601 C3FT00301 C3FT00401 CAN COLLET (TUNNEL) PD SANT FOST SANT CUGAT L6FT06901 G5FT00101 G5FT00102 PUIGD LBER PUJOLET TER O8FT00101 S2 K6FT01201 PD MARTORELLES O8FT00102 SANT ANDREU J6FT00101 K6FT01301 DE LA BARCA J6FT00102 C3FT00201 PD SANT ANDREU DE LA BARCA CAN SANT FOST MASSUET CAN TAI MONTCADA C3FT00202 G4FT00101 LA GRANADA Sta. Fe B3FT00401 A3FT00101 A3FT00201 H4FT00601 N7FT00101 AQUEDUCTE D2FT00201 N7FT00301 N7FT00201 CORBERA S3 L5FT00201 VILOBÈ TORRELLES H4FT00401 FOIX ST. MARTÈ SARROCA B3FT00101 SANT CUGAT SESGARRIGUES L5FT00301 ORRIUS PAPIOL SANT FOST L5FT00202 B3FT00701 B3FT00601 B3FT00501 VILAFRANCA CAN RUTI H4FT08401 PAPIOL POUS H4FT00201 H4FT00501 H4FT09201 (-) L5FT00302 P7FT00201 P7FT00601 C3FT00101 PALLEJ K5FT07601 PTT œ EDT2 M5FT00302 M6FT00601 H4FT01D01 EB SANT MARTI œ PALLEJ POUS K4FT00303 TORRELLES L5FT00601 SANT ANDREU SANT VICENÇ K4FT0302 L5FT00303 (+) P7FT00301 LLAVANERES 1 P7FT00801 MONTALT 1 TIANA M5FT00301 D2FT00301 N7FT00401 SANT PERE