Daf Hayomi B'halacha Monthly Bulletin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
בס”ד For information about the upcoming Dirshu Convention - see pages 4-5 DAF HAYOMI B’HALACHA Issue MONTHLY BULLETIN #39 טבת תשע”ז: סימן קפד סעיף ה – סימן קצז Halachos Pertaining to a Meal מים אחרונים Topics relevant to the material learned this month in Daf HaYomi B’Halacha Does moving to the kitchen or to a different Must one make a blessing each time he exits a room constitute an interruption during a meal? room while sucking a candy? If the master of the house unwittingly Does leaving to an unroofed porch or a yard intended to end the meal while more food was off the house constitute an interruption during still meant to be served, does that constitute a a meal? halachic ending of the meal? Does exiting from an apartment to a common Must a plastic knife be covered during birchas hallway or from one dormitory room to another hamazon? constitute an interruption during a meal? 888-5-DIRSHU | 212 SECOND STREET, SUITE 404B | LAKEWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08701 SUITE 404B | LAKEWOOD, STREET, 888-5-DIRSHU | 212 SECOND 1 Does moving to the kitchen or to a different room one normally does not eat, such as a restroom. However, Rav Scheinberg (cited same location as the following meal] that if the sukkah is within the house [i.e. unsure whether different rooms occupied by different people are considered constitute an interruption during a meal? in Tzohar Ohel Boruch p. 447 §5) has a different opinion, that only when moving the roof was removed and replaced with sechach] and only the wall of the the same house or separate houses. The blessing recited at the beginning of the meal covers all foods eaten to a room that one normally enters in middle of a meal, such as the kitchen, sukkah separates it from the house, then they are considered to be the same If one remains in the common hallway without entering another as part of the meal until birchas hamazon is recited at the end. The Shulchan restroom, or a child’s bedroom, is there no issue of changing locations. His location. However, if the sukkah is erected outside the house, and the walls of apartment, Rav Shlomo Zalman (Shvus Yitzchok ibid.) and Rav Nissim Aruch and the Rema (178:1, 2) discuss the status of one who changes his mind in reasoning (Chidushei Basra §28) is that it is considered as if one has expressed the house separate them, then it is considered another room in the same house. Karelitz (Chut Shani Shabbos vol. 4, p. 96) are of the opinion that it can be middle of his meal and wishes to complete it in another location, regarding the intention to enter the locations he usually enters. Rav Elyashiv (Shvus Yitzchok ibid. §4) makes a similar distinction with regard to considered a room in the same house since the common hallway belongs necessity of reciting birchas hamazon and new blessings in the second location. Shu”t Shevet Halevi (vol. 1, 205, on Siman 178) offers an alternative changing locations in middle of eating. If the space between the sukkah and the (partially) to each apartment. On the other hand, Rav Vozner (ibid. §28), Rav The opinion of the Shulchan Aruch (178:1) is that if one leaves in the middle of approach. He suggests that changing locations from one room to another was house is roofed (albeit with only a cloth), it is considered a separate room inside Scheinberg (ibid.), and Rav Elyashiv (Shvus Yitzchok ibid.) are of the opinion his meal,the meal is considered to have ended even if he returns to his original only considered an interruption of a meal when the custom was that everyone the house and not a distinct location; however, if there is an unroofed separation that since it is a separate domain possessed in common by all apartments location and wishes to continue eating. He must recite birchas hamazon over reclined in his place and the shamash (waiter) served them. Then, there was of three tefachim (handbreadths) between the house and the sukkah, they are it is considered a separate location. However, Rav Elyashiv differentiates the food that he already ate and recite new blessings before continuing to eat. no reason for anyone to get up from his seat during the meal and if one left the considered distinct locations and one should not move from one to the other between the area of the common hallway immediately adjacent to the door The Mishnah Berurah §12 and §26 rules like the Rema who disagrees with the room it was an interruption. Nowadays that meals are not usually served by a without reciting blessings. of an apartment and the rest of the hallway. He assumes that the immediate Shulchan Aruch and says that no new blessings need be recited if he had been waiter, and at least one person sitting at the meal needs to leave the room in Does exiting from an apartment to a common hallway vicinity of the apartment door is designated for use only by the members of eating bread; however, these rules apply when consuming fruits or beverages. order to bring the food, moving to the kitchen during the meal is not considered or from one dormitory room to another constitute an that apartment and is not considered a separate location. [See se’if 5 regarding the rule for fruits of the Seven Species and wine.] an interruption. interruption during a meal? Shu”t Ohr Letziyon (ibid.) has an entirely different view about this The Mishnah Berurah (§33) rules that even according to the Rema it is Does moving from a room to an unroofed porch or a yard According to the Rema one is permitted to move from one room of a house subject. He rules that even apartments belonging to separate owners on preferable to recite birchas hamazon in the first location beforeone leaves and off the house constitute an interruption during a meal? to another so long as he had intention to do so at the beginning of his meal. The different floors are considered rooms in the same house since they are to recite new blessings in the second location; only if one already left the first During a meal one should not leave the location in which he is eating and Mishnah Berurah (§12) writes that so long as the rooms are under the same roof under the same roof and if one had intention at the beginning of his meal to place without reciting birchas hamazon after eating bread may he continue in some circumstances this even requires that he recite new blessings in order they are considered to be in the same house, even from the ground floor to the complete it there, it does not constitute a change of location. eating in the second location without reciting any blessings. However, if one to continue his meal. However, the Rema rules that if one had intention when loft. Must one make a blessing each time he exits a room has in mind while reciting hamotzi when beginning his meal that he will move beginning his meal to move to another room, it is not considered a change of There is discussion among the poskim how to view different rooms (or while sucking a candy? to a different location, then according to the Rema both places are considered location so long as both rooms are in the same house. The Mishnah Berurah apartments) which belong to different owners in the same building. Rav Shlomo The Mishnah Berurah (§39) cites the ruling of the Chayei Adam that his locationand he may leave without reciting any blessings. (ibid.) explains that being in the `same house’ means that they are all under Zalman (cited in Shemiras Shabbos Kehilchosah 54:§27) is of the opinion that changing locations while eating interrupts the meal (if there was no original The Mishnah Berurah (§3) writes that according to the Shulchan Aruch and the same roof. with regard to Kiddush (which must be recited in the same location as the intention to switch places) even if one holds the fruit or item that he was Rema theserules apply even when both locations are rooms in the same building. There is a disagreement among the poskim whether an unroofed porch following meal) they should be considered separate locations like separate eating the entire time, since each new bite is separate.Rav Moshe Feinstein However, the Biur Halachah (s.v. babayis, at the end) concludes that although it opening off the house is considered part of the same house. Rav Shlomo Zalman houses; even when one has permission from the owner of the other room to use (Iggros Moshe O”Ch vol. 2, 57) explains that this only applies if one paused is preferable to avoid moving from one room to another in the same house while (Shvus Yitzchok ibid. §4), Rav Scheinberg (ibid. §1), and Shu”t Ohr Letziyon (vol. it, he is concerned that it may have the status of a separate house. Rav Elyashiv longer than kedei dibbur (the amount of time it takes to say a three or four eating, (unless one had intention while reciting the original blessing) since there 2, 12:16) rule that it is considered part of the house and does not constitute a (Shvus Yitzchok Ner Shabbos ibid. §4) and Rav Vozner (Shaarei Haberachah word greeting). Without such a pause, he maintains that all views permit one is a significant minority opinion that permits it, if someone relies on this opinion change of location if one originally had in mind to move there during the meal.