Trustee's of Mrs E Guthrie's 1991 Settlement Development At

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trustee's of Mrs E Guthrie's 1991 Settlement Development At www.metengineers.com Trustee’s of Mrs E Guthrie’s 1991 settlement Development at Racecourse Road East Ayton Scarborough Flood Risk Assessment And Drainage Strategy Ref-13686-5000 Revision No 00 November 2015 Professional, Innovative, Practical Solutions Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. Revision Record Report Ref: 13686-5000-00 FRA Rev Description Date Originator Checked Approved 00 Initial Report Nov 2015 AK This report is to be regarded as confidential The Trustee’s of Mrs E Guthrie’s 1991 Settlement. It is intended for your use only and may not be assigned. Consequently and in accordance with current practice, any liability to any third party in respect of the whole or any part of its contents is hereby expressly excluded. Before the report or any part of it is reproduced or referred to in any document, circular or statement and before its contents or the contents of any part of it are disclosed orally to any third party, our written approval as to the form and context of such a publication or disclosure must be obtained. Prepared For: Prepared By: Trustee’s of Mrs E Guthrie’s 1991 Met Engineers Limited Settlement Southgate House C/O Mathie Jamie Chartered Surveyors Pontefract Road Leeds West Yorkshire LS10 1SW Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Regulatory Guidance 2 1.3 Information Sources 4 1.4 Geology 5 1.5 Hydrogeology & Hydrology 6 1.6 Groundwater Protection 6 1.7 Current Environment 9 1.8 Historical Notes 9 2.0 Flood Risks and Mitigation 10 2.1 Main River Flooding 11 2.2 Non Main River Flooding 13 2.3 Groundwater and Surface Water Flooding 14 2.4 Tidal Flooding 15 3.0 Run-off Assessment 16 3.1 Existing Site 16 3.2 Development Proposal 16 Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. 3.2.1 General Drainage Considerations 16 3.2.2 Proposed Foul Drainage 18 3.23 Proposed Surface Water Drainage 18 3.2.2 Sustainable Urban Drainage 18 3.3 Proposed Measures 20 3.4 Sequential Test 21 4.0 Conclusions & Recommendations 22 Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. Appendices Appendix 1 Site Location Appendix 2 Site Photographs Appendix 3 Indicative Flood Plain Map Appendix 4 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Plans Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background i. We have been requested by The Trus M E G to undertake a Drainage Strategy and Flood Risk RunOff Assessment, for a parcel of land to the South of Racecourse Road on the Eastern limits of the Village of East Ayton near Scarborough. ii. The site is predominantly open agricultural land, and at the time of our site visit had recently been ploughed. iii. The site is roughly rectangular in shape, measuring around 2.18 Hectares, approximately 5.7 Kilometres South West of Scarborough City Centre at map reference 499439 484908. iv. The site has frontage access onto the public highway of Racecourse Road (A170)and Seamer Road (B1261)and is outlined on the enclosed location plan (Appendix 1) v. The nearest main watercourse to the site is the River Derwent, flowing in a southerly direction approximately 600m west of the site. vi. The site falls generally from the North East to the South West by approximately 8m. Highway boundary hedges to Racecourse Road and timber post and rail fence to Seamer Road form the North and south boundary respectively, the western boundary is again defined by Hedgerow to existing residential property with a BT Telephone Exchange in the south west corner to Seamer Road. There is no obvious boundary to the East. vii. The Northern part of the site is allocated within Scarborough Borough Councils (Draft) Local plan designated as residential allocation under policy HA29. viii. The objective of a Flood Risk Assessment is to demonstrate that a proposed development is sustainable in flood risk terms. This means that the development should not itself be at a significant risk of flooding or result in an increased flood risk elsewhere. The guidance given in The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that Local Authorities should adopt Proactive strategies at a local level through Strategic Flood Risk Assessments. Date November 2015 Page 1 Revision Number 00 Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. ix. As a consequence of NPPF, issued in March 2012, which refers to Flooding and Flood Risk, it is necessary to provide an assessment of the potential problems which are associated with: a. Permitting the Development. b. Potential risk of flooding from the watercourse and sewer network. c. Safety of occupants of the dwellings. d. Impact upon the local hydrological network. x. In the absence of a report, the Planning Authority are required to use the P P should refuse the application, unless there are grounds for not doing so. xi. In order to provide a Flood Risk Assessment, use has been made of the information contained at the offices of the Environment Agency, Yorkshire Water and Scarborough Borough Council. xii. The Environment Agency and Yorkshire Water have been consulted and their information and comments have been used in this report. 1.2. Regulatory Guidance i. National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) along with the Technical Guidance replaces PPS25 and provides the regulatory framework and guidance for Planning Authorities in relation to Flood Risk issues for new developments. Any applications lodged with a Planning Authority will be considered in conjunction with this guidance and dependant on the nature and location of the application, the Planning Authority may request a Flood Risk Assessment as part of the Planning Application documents. ii. The Environment Agency (EA) are a Statutory Consultee to the Planning Authority in relation to Flood Risk issues. In addition, many Local Authorities have their own Internal Land Drainage Department which advice on Drainage Issues and work with the EA on Strategic issues. The Land Drainage Act 1991 provides a regulatory framework for this arrangement. iii. The Agency has provided a matrix for Local Planning Authorities, which provides F ‘ A T E Agency Standing advise Development and Flood Ri F tabulates the requirements relative to the scale of development and the predicted Date November 2015 Page 2 Revision Number 00 Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. Flood Zone. The assessment is required for all sites greater than 1Ha in Flood Zone 1, and all sites regardless of size in Flood Zones 2 & 3a. iv. The Environment Agency have undertaken a national study of flood risk across the whole of England and published flood maps covering the country. The maps can be viewed on the agencies website at www.environment- agency.gov.uk/whatsinmybackyard. Specific locations can be studied by searching either using a postcode or general location. A copy of the Flood Zone Map covering this location is attached in Appendix 5. v. The EA Flood maps identify 3 zones. vi. Flood Zone 1. This zone comprises of land with less than 1 in 1000 annual probability of river or sea flooding in any one year (<0.1%) vii. Flood Zone 2. This zone comprises of land assessed as having between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1000 annual probability of river flooding (1%-0.1%) or between 1in 200 and 1in 1000 annual probability of sea flooding (0.5%-0.1%) in any one year. viii. Flood Zone 3. This zone comprises of land assessed as having a 1 in 100 year or greater annual probability of river flooding (>1%) or a 1 in 200 or greater annual probability of flooding from the sea (>0.5%) in any year. ix. Flood risks should consider the risk of flooding from all sources ie, tidal and river, surface water and flooding from land, groundwater, sewers and artificial sources, eg canals and reservoirs. x. The level of detail and complexity of a Flood Risk Assessment can vary considerably, dependant on the scale, nature and location of the planned development. EA guidance sets out the criteria for the level of information which should be included within the FRA. xi. According to the Environment Agencies Indicative Flood maps, the Application site falls within Flood Zone 1 and is greater than 1Hectare, therefore a site specific Flood Risk Assessment is required. xii. NPPF sets out criteria for vulnerability classifications which are based on the sensitivity of different forms of development. In accordance with NPPF, the intended M V xiii. The Sequential Test: In accordance NPPF LPA should apply the sequential test, to demonstrate that there are no available sites in the area with a lower risk of flooding. Date November 2015 Page 3 Revision Number 00 Land at Racecourse Road, East Ayton, Scarborough. xiv. The Exception Test: The Exception test is relevant if, following the application of the sequential test, it is not possible for the development to be located in zones of lower probability of flooding. The exception test criteria are detailed in NPPF. The test provides a method of managing flood risk while still allowing necessary development to occur. xv. Y W S A the standards for adoptable surface water and foul sewers. They also apply development control standards locally which are consistent with current best practice and Building Regulations. xvi. D - Y W to ensure that there is sufficient time for the company to fully assess the impact of development on their network and Treatment Facilities. This process also ensures that drainage strategies are acceptable in principle, prior to Planning Permission and helps avoid any objections from Yorkshire Water during the Planning Process. xvii. T F W M A change the way developers and Local Authorities approach the design and adoption of SuDS N SDS A B SAB SDS SAB SuDS designs and adopt the constructed drainage.
Recommended publications
  • Yorkshire's Hidden Vale Area
    YORKSHIRE’S HIDDEN VALE The roles of the River Derwent and the River Hertford in Landscape Action for the Eastern Vale of Pickering A report by Bowles Green Ltd and The Yorkshire Wildlife Trust With generous support from LEADER Coast, Wolds, Wetlands and Waterways (CWWW) through the East Riding and North Yorkshire Waterways Partnership; The Rural Development Programme for England/LEADER East Riding of Yorkshire 1 Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the generous grant from LEADER Coast, Wolds, Wetlands and Waterways (CWWW) via the East Riding and North Yorkshire Waterways Partnership. The authors would also like to thank Harriet Linfoot for her hard work in the local communities, gathering the essential information which shaped this report. Over 200 people provided responses to face to face questions or the on-line survey. Their honest engagement made this report possible and worthwhile. A large number of people commented on the draft of this report and others unselfishly allowed their works and writings to be used or quoted. To all these people, our grateful thanks. Cover photograph Flixton Brow view from the top of the escarpment across the Valley ©Tim Burkinshaw Senior Authors Yorkshire Wildlife Trust Kevin Bayes Harriet Linfoot Bowles Green Steven Green Judith Bowles 2 Contents page 1.0 Summary 5 2.0 Introduction to the document 7 3.0 Introduction to Yorkshire’s Hidden Vale 8 4.0 Background documents on Landscape and Significance 9 5.0 Programme Area 10 6.0 The Cultural and Natural Heritage of the Programme
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan - Contents
    The draft BAP was prepared by the Scarborough Biodiversity Steering Group and was consulted upon in December 2004. Following consideration of the responses received the BAP was revised by the BAP Steering Group and formally adopted by the Steering Group and Scarborough Borough Council in April 2005. Additional thanks to the following people who prepared Habitat and Species Action Plans: Graham Megson (North Yorkshire Count Council), Bob Missin, Paul Bullimore (Sea Life Centre), Scarborough Field Naturalists, Simon Pickles and James Mortimer of the North and East Yorkshire Ecological Data Centre and John Drewitt (North Yorkshire Bat Group). Scarborough's Biodiversity Action Plan - Contents Introduction What is Biodiversity? 4 Why is Biodiversity important? 4 The National and Regional Framework 4 So, what is a Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) and why does Scarborough need one? 5 The Scarborough BAP What area does the BAP cover? 8 Who prepared the BAP? 8 Criteria for the selection of Local Priority Habitats. 8 Criteria for the selection of Local Priority Species. 8 Taking Action and Monitoring Introduction 10 Information and Data 10 Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Scarborough 11 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation 11 Other Strategies and Plans 12 Reporting and Monitoring 12 Review 13 General Action Plan 13 Getting Involved How Can I Help With This Biodiversity Thing? 16 Introduction to Scarborough’s Wildlife Diversity Scarborough’s Wildlife Diversity 18 The Habitat Action Plans The Selected Habitats and Species 22 Woodland
    [Show full text]
  • PARISH NEWS 16.Pub
    ISSUE 16 Linda Thompson Que Sera, North Street, Flixton YO11 3UA Tele/Fax 01723 892162 [email protected] Please see notice board at top of North Street. Parish Council Meetings are held every first Tuesday in the month unless otherwise stated in the minutes displayed in the 4 Village FOLKTON AND FLIXTON Y.C.A. Noticeboards :- Outside the Village Hall, Programme For 2011 Meeting are on 1st Tuesday in each Top of North Street month.You don’t need to be a By post box on A 1039 member. ALL ARE WELCOME. Main Street Folkton The first 15 minutes is an OPEN MEETING which November 1st SLIDESHOW BY R. CHILD- anyone can come to then the Council set about BOOKED FEE. the business on the Agenda. December 6th. WREATHES AND GARLANDS Parishioners are welcome to stay but can play no further part in the proceedings. If you ROANNE NURSERY. would like to view items on the agenda they are available in the Village Hall on the THIS YEARS CHRISTMAS SUPPER IS ON Saturday prior to the meeting 10:30-11:30 Your Parish Councillors are:- Chairman Mr.M Brown 01723890516 25TH.NOVEMBER Vice Chairman Mr.B.Found 01723891256 Mr. T.Cresswell 01723890752 Mr.A. Bower 01723890101 IN THE VILLAGE HALL STARTING AT 7:00P.M. Mr.C. Hodgson 01723859000 THE DECK DENE SINGERS WILL BE ENTERTAIN- Mr.K.Robinson 01723890731 Mrs. J.Carroll 01723891548 ING US. TICKETS ARE £7:50 EACH AND ARE Mrs L.Thompson 01723892162 AVAILABLE FROM ANY Y.C.A. MEMBERTELE Mr. T. Moxlow 01723891236 Parish Clerk Mr.C.Adnitt 01723513949 LINDA THOMPSON 01723892162.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    ENVIRONMENT AGENCY NORTH EAST REGION RIVER QUALITY SURVEY GQA ASSESSMENT 1998 DALES AREA FRESHWATER RIVERS AND CANALS RIVER REACH CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY 1990-9 JULY 1999 E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE NORTH EAST REGION Tyneside House. Skinnerbum Road, Newcastle Business Park. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE4 7AR INTRODUCTION This document contains the derived General Quality Assessment (GQA) of the rivers in Dales Area for the year 1998. The grade is based on an amalgamation of three years data and thus reflects the river chemistry over the period 1996-8. The parameters used in the classification are Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Ammonia and a monitoring frequency of at least monthly is preferred. The GQA results have been calculated by the National Centre for Environmental Data and Surveillance at Twerton. There have been some discrepancies between their database of sites and ours, always a problem when such huge blocks of information are transmitted backwards and forwards. This resulted in no GQA grade being calculated for some sites. Where this has occurred I have filled in the missing grade by calculating it locally. In such circumstances this is identified by the grade being represented in lower case. You will notice that this document is slightly different to those produced in previous years in that it does not contain any maps. There are a number of reasons for this but primarily it was decided to disseminate the tabular information rapidly after it’s return from the national centre out to the areas and produce a more in depth analysis of the information later on in the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Management Plan for the Yorkshire River Derwent
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Fisheries Management Plan for the Yorkshire River Derwent Being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Master of Science at the University of Hull By Daniel James Alfred Upsher Aquatic Zoology BSc (Hons) September 2014 Acknowledgements I wish to extend my sincerest gratitude and gratefulness to those who helped me accomplish this study. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Ian Cowx, for allowing me to have such a fantastic opportunity to work with him, also for his valuable feedback and guidance over the course of my MSc. I would also like to thank all the HIFI team especially Jon Harvey, for answering all my questions and Andy Nunn for all his technical support. Much appreciation goes to the Environment Agency for providing me with the data to undertake this study. I especially appreciated the help of John Shannon for the enlightening days out on the walk-over survey. A big thank you must go to all the supporting staff I have come across during my time at University; Biological Sciences, Disability Services and Graduate School. I would like to thank my closest friends, Tom, Charlie, Dan, Jordan, Dom, Chris, Togay and Alex for all being such amazing friends and for your support and continual efforts to keep me driven but not forgetting all the wonderful people I have met during my studies. A special thank you cannot be missed for, Christina Titlow (and the girls) for putting up with me through the ‘ups’ and ‘downs’ and above all keeping a smile on my face! Finally, an enormous thank you goes to my family.
    [Show full text]
  • River Response to Recent Environmental Change in the Yorkshire Ouse Basin, Northern England
    River response to recent environmental change in the Yorkshire Ouse basin, northern England. Sean Anthony Longfield, B.Sc. (H ons) 'N/ Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Geography July 1998 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the w'ork of others II A b s t r a c t Longfield, S.A. 1998. River response to recent environmental change in the Yorkshire Ouse basin, northern England. University of Leeds, Ph.D. This study examines historical variations in flood frequency and magnitude in the Yorkshire Ouse basin, northern England, over the last 900 years. The causes of temporal and spatial variations in flooding are evaluated through investigation of climatic and land-use controls. Documentary evidence of flooding and climate suggests that a series of large floods between 1263 and 1360 were associated with climatic deterioration from the Medieval Optimum. A shift to generally milder conditions between 1361 and 1549 resulted in no floods being documented in the Ouse basin The frequency of large magnitude floods increased dramatically between 1550 and 1680, as a result of low temperatures, increased surface wetness, more frequent snowfall and a southward shift of prevailing storm tracks over middle latitudes, associated with the onset of the "Little Ice Age’. In contrast, during a wanner phase of the Little Ice Age, between 1681 and 1763, the frequency of localised summer flooding increased in the Ouse basin due to more frequent high intensity, short duration convective storms.
    [Show full text]
  • INVASIVE NON-NATIVE SPECIES REPORT and CONTROL STRATEGY for Riparian Plants
    INVASIVE NON-NATIVE SPECIES REPORT and CONTROL STRATEGY for Riparian plants YORKSHIRE DERWENT CATCHMENT November 2019 Original Author: Matt Cross 2017 Revised by Vanessa Barlow 2019 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust 1 St. George’s Place York YO24 1GN Tel: 01904 659570 Email: [email protected] www.ywt.org.uk Yorkshire Wildlife Trust is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England Number 409650 Registered Charity Number 210807 ©Yorkshire Wildlife Trust 2019 All rights reserved INNS Report and Control Strategy Table of Contents Overview of work 2019/20 .................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 The Yorkshire Derwent Catchment ................................................................................................. 5 1.2 River Derwent SSSI .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) ................................................................................................ 6 1.3.1 INNS Legislation ........................................................................................................................ 7 2 INNS status in the Yorkshire Derwent Catchment ......................................................................... 9 3 Determining Priorities ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cayton and Flixton Carrs Wetland Project… …Why, What, Where and When? by David Renwick, Project Officer
    David Renwick, Project Officer, Cayton and Flixton Carrs Wetland Project, 19/04/06 The Cayton and Flixton Carrs Wetland Project… …Why, What, Where and When? By David Renwick, Project Officer This partnership project in the Vale of Pickering aims to rehabilitate a nationally-important wetland landscape through sensitive farm management, to make the Vale a richer place for wildlife and more attractive and accessible for the benefit of all. Introduction The Cayton and Flixton Carrs Wetland Project aims to help local farmers and landowners to create, manage and restore wetland habitats in the Vale of Pickering around Cayton and Flixton Carrs. It builds on the existing environmental and archaeological importance of this inspiring area. The Vale of Pickering has a fascinating landscape history from its glacial past, through the effects of man, from Mesolithic settlement to modern drainage, to the current changes in British Farming and the effects on wildlife through the ages. The Project is working with local farmers to boost the area’s wildlife whilst at the same time helping them to secure a financially viable farm business, this will not only benefit the farmers and the wildlife but also provide much wider benefits which we can all enjoy. Here is a summary of what has happened so far and a taste of what we hope can happen in the future. A Chilly Beginning The last ice age or Pleistocene period lasted some 2.5 million years, with ice advancing and retreating across Britain many times over, finally disappearing completely some 10,000 years ago. At this time, now named as the beginning of the current Holocene period the landscape of North Yorkshire was still recovering from the grips of the last ice age.
    [Show full text]
  • An Account of a Yorkshire Enclosure: Staxton 1803
    i: !i i' An Account of a Yorkshire Enclosure / b Staxton 18o3 By BRIAN LOUGHBROUGH HE belt of country that extends from settlement nuclei are situated in the Vale of Dorset through the English scarp- Pickering at the foot of the chalk scarp of the T lands to North Yorkshire contains Yorkshire Wolds. It shares in the successive some of the most interesting examples of types of soil that are contained within the early land-use planning. In the eighteenth elongated boundaries of each township. The and nineteenth centuries the open fields and chalkland, which rises to about 55 ° feet above i ' commons of over two thousand parishes were sea level on Staxton Wold, once presented a enclosed by Act of Parliament. In addition to much more open appearance than it does the details given in these Acts and the subse- today. The steep dry valleys, separated by quent Awards, further evidence of the way smoothly curving wolds, were covered with a in which individual enclosures took place close sward derived from continuous sheep can be obtained from various other papers. grazing. Few fences or trees and no settle- Among these, minute books of the enclosure ments obstructed the views across the higher are perhaps the most valuable, for they help northern part of the Yorkshire Wolds. There to fill in details of the events that took place was a certain amount of cultivation on the between the framing of the Bill and the regis- wold because of the lack of available field land tration of the final Award. 1 in the vale itself, so that the wold formed a The notebook which was kept by the soli- type of 'outfield', which was cultivated not citor to the enclosure of the East Yorkshire more often than once in six years.
    [Show full text]
  • And North Ridings. 7
    " AND NORTH RIDINGS. 7 The eaat MOORL.oI.NDi'I of the N orth­ form the lICCUre harlxnuof Kinglton, which, Riding form a peculiar feature in the coun­ from this river, is generally called Hull. try, being Wholly detached fr<¥I1 the moun­ The lea coast of the North and East tains in the west. Some points of the east Ridings of Yorkshire is very extensive, and MOORLANDS rise nearly 900 feet above the affords several secure harbours;-The bar· level of the sea; but the most remarkable bours of Hull, Scarborough, Whitby, and summit uf the whole is Roseberry Topping, Bridlington, are described under their ap­ d~cribed at page 522 of this volumc.­ propriate heads in this volume, to which By its detached position and superior eleva­ may blI added the Day of Filey and Robin tion, it commands in all directions a prospect Hood's Bay. at once extensive and interesting. The hill The Minerals of the North-Riding con. rests on a basis of alum rock, interspersed sist chiefly of the alum mines, on the.coast with iron-stone, and its pinnacled summit of Whitby, as mentioned at pages 416 and indicates to the surrounding country the 574 of this volume, and the lead mines in approaching change in the weather, as ex­ Swaledale, Rnd the neighbouring vallies. pressed in the following metrical proverb- as described at page 555. About the middle " When Rosebcrry Topping wears a cap, ofthe last century copper of good quality was produced near Middleton Ty35, but I< Let Cleveland then beware of a clap." the works have been for some years dis­ Along the whole length of the N orth­ continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterways Strategy 2012-2020
    Rural Development Programme for England/LEADER East Riding of Yorkshire and North Yorkshire (Ryedale District and Scarborough Borough) Coast,LEADER W olds,Local Action W Groupetlands & Waterways Coast, Wolds, Wetlands & Waterways East Riding & North Yorkshire Waterways Partnership WATERWAYS STRATEGY 2012-2020 The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Coast, Wolds, Wetlands & Waterways Development: Europe investing in rural areas ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements This is a Partnership Strategy that has been driven by, and written for, its members. As such, thanks go to all partners that have contributed throughout the strategy development process, on a formal and informal basis. Without this willingness to share issues and opportunities and balance priorities, the creation of this document would not have been possible. Thank you to members of the Community and Technical Forums for the consistent input into the document, and the shaping of its outcomes, priorities and objectives. Thank you to everyone else that has made comments on the document or who has had an involvement in its production. Thank you to the LEADER CWWW Local Action Group for developing the Partnership, for their vision in identifying the potential that the area’s waterways possess and for providing funding for the Partnership, and the projects that is has been able to support. Thank you to East Riding of Yorkshire Council for hosting Partnership staff, and for providing crucial ongoing support to the Partnership’s development. Thank you to North Yorkshire County Council, Scarborough Borough Council and Ryedale District Council for their involvement and support. Finally, thank you to the Partnership Executive Committee for their ongoing direction and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Vale of Pickering Statement of Significance
    Vale of Pickering Statement of Significance Project undertaken for English Heritage (Yorkshire and Humber Region). Dr Louise Cooke, Old Bridge Barn, Yedingham, Malton, North Yorkshire. [email protected]. 1 Contents Introduction 3 Summary Statement of Significance 5 Summary 12 Landscape Description 16 Evidential Value 19 Historical Value 27 Natural Value 45 Aesthetic Value 51 Communal Value 54 At Risk Statement 59 What Next? 64 List of individuals and organisations consulted for the production of the document 65 Directory of organisations with interests in the Vale of Pickering 65 Bibliography 67 List of photographs 68 2 Introduction The Vale of Pickering Historic Environment Management Framework Project was initiated by English Heritage (Yorkshire and Humber Region) in response to a number of factors and issues: The immediate problems raised by the desiccation of the peats at the eastern end of the Vale, at the Early Mesolithic site of Star Carr, The realisation that the exceptional archaeological landscape identified between Rillington and Sherburn cannot adequately be managed through current approaches to designation. The incremental increase in the number of agencies and projects with an interest in the Vale but little concerted action or agreement about the qualities that make the Vale of Pickering a unique landscape. The need for an agreed, clear statement on the special character, qualities and attributes of the Vale which can be incorporated into policy documents For English Heritage this Statement of Significance is the first stage in developing an overall strategy for the Vale of Pickering. Once this document has been agreed and „endorsed‟ by its partners and co-contributors, the intention is that it will be followed by an „Action Plan‟ that will: Illustrate how the special qualities of the Vale can be enhanced through specific projects Seek funding for and propose specific projects and initiatives.
    [Show full text]