DOCSLIB.ORG

The RUNX Family in Breast Cancer: Relationships with Estrogen Signaling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The RUNX Family in Breast Cancer: Relationships with Estrogen Signaling Oncogene (2013) 32, 2121–2130 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW The RUNX family in breast cancer: relationships with estrogen signaling N-O Chimge1 and B Frenkel2 The three RUNX family members are lineage specific master regulators, which also have important, context-dependent roles in carcinogenesis as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes. Here we review evidence for such roles in breast cancer (BCa). RUNX1, the predominant RUNX family member in breast epithelial cells, has a tumor suppressor role reflected by many somatic mutations found in primary tumor biopsies. The classical tumor suppressor gene RUNX3 does not consist of such a mutation hot spot, but it too seems to inhibit BCa; it is often inactivated in human BCa tumors and its haploinsufficiency in mice leads to spontaneous BCa development. The tumor suppressor activities of RUNX1 and RUNX3 are mediated in part by antagonism of estrogen signaling, a feature recently attributed to RUNX2 as well. Paradoxically, however RUNX2, a master osteoblast regulator, has been implicated in various aspects of metastasis in general and bone metastasis in particular. Reciprocating the anti-estrogenic tumor suppressor activity of RUNX proteins, inhibition of RUNX2 by estrogens may help explain their context-dependent anti-metastatic roles. Such roles are reserved to non-osseous metastasis, because ERa is associated with increased, not decreased skeletal dissemination of BCa cells. Finally, based on diverse expression patterns in BCa subtypes, the successful use of future RUNX-based therapies will most likely require careful patient selection. Oncogene (2013) 32, 2121–2130; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.328; published online 8 October 2012 Keywords: RUNX1; RUNX2; RUNX3; tumor suppressor; oncogene; ERa The mammalian RUNX family of transcription factors comprises diverse origins have been extensively reviewed,21–24 and Table 1 three members, RUNX1, RUNX2 and RUNX3, which have pivotal summarizes reported abnormalities implicating each of the RUNX roles in both normal development and neoplasia.1 Despite their proteins as a tumor suppressor in various cancer types. structural similarities, RUNX proteins have divergent physiological roles; RUNX1 is required for definitive hematopoiesis,2 RUNX2 has fundamental roles in the differentiation of osteoblasts and RUNX1 AS A BCa SUPPRESSOR chondrocytes,3–5 and RUNX3 is involved in gastrointestinal and 6–8 In addition to their most notable roles in hematopoietic cells, bone neuronal development. Inherited mutations in RUNX1 are the cells and neurons, the three RUNX genes are also expressed in the cause of familial platelet disorder with associated myeloid normal mammary gland, and their mRNA levels fluctuate during malignancy,9 and RUNX2 mutations cause the dominant 25 10 cycles of pregnancy, lactation and involution. RUNX1 is the autosomal skeletal disease cleidocranial dysplasia. predominant RUNX family member expressed in human breast In cancer, RUNX act as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes 13,26,27 1,11 epithelial cells (Figure 1a) and the protein is readily detected depending on cellular context. RUNX1 is a frequent target in both the basal and the luminal cell layers.26 The most of translocations and other mutations in hematopoietic maligna- compelling evidence for its role in inhibiting BCa is the somatic ncies, and RUNX3, located on chromosome 1p36, resides mutations recently observed in RUNX1 (and not RUNX2 or RUNX3) in a deletion hotspot found in diverse cancers of epithelial, 28 12 in tumors from the Washington University BRC77 study and in hematopoietic and neuronal origins. Tumor suppressor activity the cohort of BCa patients studied in The Cancer Genome Atlas in breast cancer (BCa) has been attributed to all three RUNX pilot project29 (Figure 1b). Furthermore, RUNX1 was one of 17 proteins,13–15 whereas RUNX2 is increasingly recognized as pro- 30 11,16–20 genes whose expression pattern predicted BCa metastasis; its metastatic in breast (and prostate) cancer progression. Here expression is less abundant in BCa compared to normal breast we review the dual functions of RUNX proteins in BCa and their epithelial cells, and it progressively decreases with increasing relationships with estrogen signaling. BCa tumor aggression.31 Finally, experimental Ras-mediated transformation of basal-like MCF10A cells was associated with loss of RUNX1;31 and RUNX1 silencing in another study with RUNX PROTEINS ARE TUMOR SUPPRESSORS MCF10A cells led to the formation of abnormal, hyperproliferative All three mammalian RUNX family members have been implicated acinar structures in 3D cultures.13 in tumor suppression. The frequent functional inactivation of How RUNX1 suppresses BCa remains to be elucidated. Among RUNX1 and RUNX3 observed in hematopoietic and solid tumors of possible mechanisms, RUNX1 may stimulate E-cadherin to inhibit 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA and 2Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Correspondence: Dr N-O Chimge or Dr B Frenkel, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Institute for Genetic Medicine, 2250 Alcazar Street, CSC-240, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Received 3 May 2012; revised 20 June 2012; accepted 20 June 2012; published online 8 October 2012 RUNX1,2,3 in breast cancer N-O Chimge and B Frenkel 2122 Table 1. Tumor suppressor activities of the RUNX family in various cancers RUNX Types of cancer Related mechanisms References RUNX1 AML-M2 RUNX1-ETO: t(8;21)(q22;q22) 137–140 RUNX1-LRP16: t(11;21)(q13;q22) RUNX1-MTG16: t(16;21)(q24;q22) RUNX1-others Mut 141,142 MDS RUNX1-EVI: t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) 140,143–149 RUNX1-MDS1: t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) RUNX1-EAP: t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) RUNX1-PRDM6: t(1;21)(p36;q22) RUNX1-others Mut 150–156 B-ALL TEL-RUNX1: t(12;21)(p13;q22) 157–160 FPDMM Hemizygous deletion, SNP 9,161 AML-M1 Mut 162 AML-M0 LOH, biallelic RUNX1 mut 162–164 CMML Mut 165,166 Colorectal Mut 167 Gastointestinal tract Mut 168,169 Esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma SNP 170,171 Prostate SNP 172 Breast Mut 28,29 RUNX2 Osteosarcoma Inhibition of proliferation 173,174 Breast Antagonism of estrogen signaling 15 RUNX3 Gastric Hemizygous deletion, Mut, 8,167,169,175–177 hypermethylation, cytoplasmic mislocalization Bladder Mut, hypermethylation 178–180 Prostate Hypermethylation 181 Lung Hemizygous deletion, hypermethylation 182 Pancreatic Hemizygous deletion, hypermethylation 183 Colorectal Hypermethylation, Mut, cytoplasmic mislocalization 184–187 Brain Hypermethylation 188 Squamous cell carcinoma Cytoplasmic mislocalization 189 Hepatocellular carcinoma Hypermethylation 37,190 Bile duct Hemizygous deletion 183 Renal cell carcinoma Inhibition of proliferation 191 Bone Hypermethylation 192 Breast Hypermethylation, 14,34,35 cytoplasmic mislocalization Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloblastic leukemia; AML-M0, minimally differentiated acute myeloblastic leukemia; AML-M1, acute myeloblastic leukemia without maturation; CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; FPDMM, familial platelet disorder with associated myeloid malignancy; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; Mut, mutations other than SNPs or translocations; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; t, translocation. Studies of breast cancer are in bold text. epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)32 and it may increased estradiol signaling owing to partial loss of ERa cooperate with FOXO signaling to protect ER-negative BCa cells destabilization by RUNX314 (Figure 2a). Expression of RUNX3 from oxidative stress.13 In ER-positive cells, however, we believe decreases during human BCa progression and high RUNX3 RUNX1 attenuates oncogenic effects of estrogens (Figure 2a) levels are associated with favorable prognosis.35 As in other mainly through physical interaction with ERa.33 In fact, all but one malignancies, RUNX3 is frequently inactivated in BCa by RUNX1 somatic mutations found so far are in ERa-positive promoter hypermethylation, genetic deletion, and protein tumors.28,29 mislocalization.34,35,37–42 RUNX3 promoter hypermethylation in response to estradiol has been observed in mammosphere- derived cells, which may contribute to the oncogenic activity of estradiol in breast epithelial cells.43 RUNX3 AS A BCa SUPPRESSOR Evidence suggesting a role for RUNX3 in inhibiting various malignancies is cited in Table 114,34–36 and the literature on the tumor suppressor role of RUNX3 specifically in BCa has been RUNX2 AS A BCa SUPPRESSOR recently reviewed.24 Most notably, RUNX3 hemizygous female RUNX2 is expressed in the developing mammary gland during mice develop spontaneous ductal carcinoma,14 attributable to embryogenesis5 and puberty, and its mRNA levels in glands of Oncogene (2013) 2121 – 2130 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited RUNX1,2,3 in breast cancer N-O Chimge and B Frenkel 2123 RUNX1: Chr.21q22.3 Scale: 200 kb hg19 RUNX1 RUNX1 RUNX1 Brain Heart Lymph Node Breast HMEC RUNX2: Chr.6p21 Scale: 200 kb hg19 RUNX2 RUNX2 RUNX2 Brain Heart Lymph Node Breast HMEC RUNX3: Chr.1p36 Scale: 200 kb hg19 RUNX3 RUNX3 Brain Heart Lymph Node Breast HMEC frame shift deletion frame shift insertion RUNX1 in-frame deletion missense nonsense F259fs Q266* L288fs L317F 322e7+2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RUNX1 Control of Mammary Epithelial and Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS GSBS Dissertations and Theses Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences 2017-12-12 RUNX1 Control of Mammary Epithelial and Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes Deli Hong University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss Part of the Cancer Biology Commons, and the Cell Biology Commons Repository Citation Hong D. (2017). RUNX1 Control of Mammary Epithelial and Breast Cancer Cell Phenotypes. GSBS Dissertations and Theses. https://doi.org/10.13028/M21Q2F. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/949 This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSBS Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RUNX1 CONTROL OF MAMMARY EPITHELIAL AND BREAST CANCER CELL PHENOTYPES A Dissertation Presented By Deli Hong Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Massachusetts Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Worcester in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 12, 2017 Program of Cell Biology RUNX1 CONTROL OF MAMMARY EPITHELIAL AND BREAST CANCER CELL PHENOTYPES A Dissertation Presented By Deli Hong This work was undertaken in the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Program of Cell Biology The signature of the Thesis Advisor signifies validation of Dissertation content Gary S. Stein, Ph. D., Thesis Advisor The signatures of the Dissertation Defense Committee signify completion and approval as to style and content of the Dissertation Leslie Shaw, Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • Functions of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor in the Hippocampus By
    Functions of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor in the Hippocampus by Aaron M. Rozeboom A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Cellular and Molecular Biology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Audrey F. Seasholtz, Chair Professor Elizabeth A. Young Professor Ronald Jay Koenig Associate Professor Gary D. Hammer Assistant Professor Jorge A. Iniguez-Lluhi Acknowledgements There are more people than I can possibly name here that I need to thank who have helped me throughout the process of writing this thesis. The first and foremost person on this list is my mentor, Audrey Seasholtz. Between working in her laboratory as a research assistant and continuing my training as a graduate student, I spent 9 years in Audrey’s laboratory and it would be no exaggeration to say that almost everything I have learned regarding scientific research has come from her. Audrey’s boundless enthusiasm, great patience, and eager desire to teach students has made my time in her laboratory a richly rewarding experience. I cannot speak of Audrey’s laboratory without also including all the past and present members, many of whom were/are not just lab-mates but also good friends. I also need to thank all the members of my committee, an amazing group of people whose scientific prowess combined with their open-mindedness allowed me to explore a wide variety of interests while maintaining intense scientific rigor. Outside of Audrey’s laboratory, there have been many people in Ann Arbor without whom I would most assuredly have gone crazy.
    [Show full text]
  • GATA3 As an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: a Study with a Review of the Literature
    diagnostics Article GATA3 as an Adjunct Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients with Less Aggressive Disease: A Study with a Review of the Literature Patrizia Querzoli 1, Massimo Pedriali 1 , Rosa Rinaldi 2 , Paola Secchiero 3, Paolo Giorgi Rossi 4 and Elisabetta Kuhn 5,6,* 1 Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] (P.Q.); [email protected] (M.P.) 2 Section of Anatomic Pathology, ASST Mantova, Ospedale Carlo Poma, 46100 Mantova, Italy; [email protected] 3 Surgery and Experimental Medicine and Interdepartmental Center of Technology of Advanced Therapies (LTTA), Department of Morphology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] 4 Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy; [email protected] 5 Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milano, Italy 6 Department of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-5032-0564; Fax: +39-02-5503-2860 Abstract: Background: GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) expression is positively correlated with Citation: Querzoli, P.; Pedriali, M.; estrogen receptor (ER) expression, but its prognostic value as an independent factor remains unclear. Rinaldi, R.; Secchiero, P.; Rossi, P.G.; Thus, we undertook the current study to evaluate the expression of GATA3 and its prognostic value Kuhn, E. GATA3 as an Adjunct in a large series of breast carcinomas (BCs) with long-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 702 Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer consecutive primary invasive BCs resected between 1989 and 1993 in our institution were arranged Patients with Less Aggressive in tissue microarrays, immunostained for ER, progesterone receptor (PR), ki-67, HER2, p53, and Disease: A Study with a Review of GATA3, and scored.
    [Show full text]
  • Progesterone Receptor Isoform B Regulates the Oxtr-Plcl2-Trpc3 Pathway to Suppress Uterine Contractility
    Progesterone receptor isoform B regulates the Oxtr-Plcl2-Trpc3 pathway to suppress uterine contractility Mary C. Peaveya,1, San-Pin Wub,1, Rong Lib, Jian Liub, Olivia M. Emeryb, Tianyuan Wangc, Lecong Zhouc, Margeaux Wetendorfd, Chandra Yallampallie, William E. Gibbonse, John P. Lydond, and Francesco J. DeMayob,2 aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; bReproductive and Developmental Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; cIntegrative Bioinformatic Support Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; dDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and eDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 Edited by R. Michael Roberts, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, and approved January 19, 2021 (received for review June 6, 2020) Uterine contractile dysfunction leads to pregnancy complications The “progesterone receptor isoform switch” concept was posited such as preterm birth and labor dystocia. In humans, it is hypoth- to explain the transition from a quiescent to a contractile myometrial esized that progesterone receptor isoform PGR-B promotes a re- phenotype in the presence of high levels of progesterone (10, 11, laxed state of the myometrium, and PGR-A facilitates uterine 26–30). Progesterone acts via the nuclear receptor isoforms, PGR-A contraction. This hypothesis was tested in vivo using transgenic and PGR-B, which are coexpressed at different levels throughout mouse models that overexpress PGR-A or PGR-B in smooth muscle pregnancy (31–35). Progesterone can transactivate different tran- cells. Elevated PGR-B abundance results in a marked increase in scriptional programs determined by the relative levels of PGR-A and gestational length compared to control mice (21.1 versus 19.1 d PGR-B isoforms in the myometrium (36–41).
    [Show full text]
  • The Novel Progesterone Receptor
    0013-7227/99/$03.00/0 Vol. 140, No. 3 Endocrinology Printed in U.S.A. Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society The Novel Progesterone Receptor Antagonists RTI 3021– 012 and RTI 3021–022 Exhibit Complex Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Activities: Implications for the Development of Dissociated Antiprogestins* B. L. WAGNER†, G. POLLIO, P. GIANGRANDE‡, J. C. WEBSTER, M. BRESLIN, D. E. MAIS, C. E. COOK, W. V. VEDECKIS, J. A. CIDLOWSKI, AND D. P. MCDONNELL Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology (B.L.W., G.P., P.G., D.P.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710; Molecular Endocrinology Group (J.C.W., J.A.C.), NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (M.B., W.V.V.), Louisiana State University Medical School, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (D.E.M.), San Diego, California 92121; Research Triangle Institute (C.E.C.), Chemistry and Life Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 ABSTRACT by agonists for DNA response elements within target gene promoters. We have identified two novel compounds (RTI 3021–012 and RTI Accordingly, we observed that RU486, RTI 3021–012, and RTI 3021– 3021–022) that demonstrate similar affinities for human progeste- 022, when assayed for PR antagonist activity, accomplished both of rone receptor (PR) and display equivalent antiprogestenic activity. As these steps. Thus, all three compounds are “active antagonists” of PR with most antiprogestins, such as RU486, RTI 3021–012, and RTI function. When assayed on GR, however, RU486 alone functioned as 3021–022 also bind to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) with high an active antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • And EZH2-Regulated Gene, Has Differential Roles in AR-Dependent and -Independent Prostate Cancer
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, Vol. 6, No.4 RUNX1, an androgen- and EZH2-regulated gene, has differential roles in AR-dependent and -independent prostate cancer Ken-ichi Takayama1,2, Takashi Suzuki3, Shuichi Tsutsumi4, Tetsuya Fujimura5, Tomohiko Urano1,2, Satoru Takahashi6, Yukio Homma5, Hiroyuki Aburatani4 and Satoshi Inoue1,2,7 1 Department of Anti-Aging Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 2 Department of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 3 Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan 4 Genome Science Division, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), The University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan 5 Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 6 Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan 7 Division of Gene Regulation and Signal Transduction, Research Center for Genomic Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan Correspondence to: Satoshi Inoue, email: [email protected] Keywords: RUNX1, androgen receptor, EZH2, prostate cancer Received: October 02, 2014 Accepted: December 09, 2014 Published: December 10, 2014 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is essential for the development of prostate cancer. Here, we report that runt-related transcription factor (RUNX1) could be a key molecule for the androgen-dependence of prostate cancer. We found RUNX1 is a target of AR and regulated positively by androgen.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of the Apoptosis-Related Genes Bcl-2 and P53 in Clinical Samples from Endometrial Carcinoma Patients
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 31: 4191-4194 (2011) Expression of the Apoptosis-related Genes Bcl-2 and p53 in Clinical Samples from Endometrial Carcinoma Patients IRENE GONZÁLEZ-RODILLA1, VIRGINIA VERNA2, ANA-BELÉN MUÑOZ2, JOSÉ ESTÉVEZ2, MERCEDES BOIX2 and JOSÉ SCHNEIDER2 Departments of 1Pathology and 2Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria University, Santander, Spain Abstract. Background: Although alterations in the mechanisms biological features indicative of a less aggressive tumor of apoptosis are an integral part of the tumor phenotype, their phenotype (1). Furthermore, in that same paper, any level of precise role in endometrial carcinoma is still obscure. The aim expression of Bcl-2, from the lowest upwards, was found to was to determine whether Bcl-2 plays a similar biological role be biologically significant. Finally, an explanation for the so- in endometrial cancer as in breast cancer, endometrial cancer called ‘Bcl-2 paradox in breast cancer’, where Bcl-2 being an being also a hormone-dependent tumor. Materials and anti-apoptotic gene, thus promoting the immortalisation of Methods: The expression of the apoptosis-related Bcl-2 and p53 tumor cells, should in principle represent a negative biological genes, together with Ki67, E-cadherin, c-erb-B2 and estrogen feature of tumors expressing it, virtually all published results and progesterone receptors were studied in 136 formalin-fixed, point to the opposite, i.e. that Bcl-2 expression is associated paraffin-embedded endometrial carcinoma samples by means with a better outcome in breast cancer, was put forward. Bcl- of immunohistochemistry. Results: Bcl-2 expression correlated 2 was found to be predominantly expressed in well- directly and significantly with E-cadherin (r=0.22, p=0.011) differentiated, low-proliferating breast carcinomas expressing estrogen receptor (r=0.18, p=0.04) and progesterone receptor hormone receptors, all of them highly favorable prognostic expression (r=0.30, p=0.0006), and inversely with surgical factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Jdp2 Downregulates Trp53 Transcription to Promote Leukaemogenesis in the Context of Trp53 Heterozygosity
    Oncogene (2013) 32, 397 --402 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/13 www.nature.com/onc SHORT COMMUNICATION Jdp2 downregulates Trp53 transcription to promote leukaemogenesis in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity L van der Weyden1, AG Rust1,4, RE McIntyre1,4, CD Robles-Espinoza1, M del Castillo Velasco-Herrera1, R Strogantsev2, AC Ferguson-Smith2, S McCarthy1, TM Keane1, MJ Arends3 and DJ Adams1 We performed a genetic screen in mice to identify candidate genes that are associated with leukaemogenesis in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity. To do this we generated Trp53 heterozygous mice carrying the T2/Onc transposon and SB11 transposase alleles to allow transposon-mediated insertional mutagenesis to occur. From the resulting leukaemias/lymphomas that developed in these mice, we identified nine loci that are potentially associated with tumour formation in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity, including AB041803 and the Jun dimerization protein 2 (Jdp2). We show that Jdp2 transcriptionally regulates the Trp53 promoter, via an atypical AP-1 site, and that Jdp2 expression negatively regulates Trp53 expression levels. This study is the first to identify a genetic mechanism for tumour formation in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity. Oncogene (2013) 32, 397--402; doi:10.1038/onc.2012.56; published online 27 February 2012 Keywords: p53; Jdp2; transposon; heterozygosity; lymphoma; mice INTRODUCTION targeted by transposon insertion events leading to upregulated Genetic alterations of TP53 are frequent events in tumourigenesis Jdp2 expression and a decrease in Trp53 expression levels. Further and promote genomic instability, impair apoptosis, and contribute we illustrate that Jdp2 regulates the Trp53 promoter via an atypical to aberrant self-renewal.1--4 The spectrum of mutations that occur AP-1 binding site.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutational Landscape and Clinical Outcome of Patients with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Rearrangements Involving 11Q23/KMT2A
    Mutational landscape and clinical outcome of patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia and rearrangements involving 11q23/KMT2A Marius Billa,1,2, Krzysztof Mrózeka,1,2, Jessica Kohlschmidta,b, Ann-Kathrin Eisfelda,c, Christopher J. Walkera, Deedra Nicoleta,b, Dimitrios Papaioannoua, James S. Blachlya,c, Shelley Orwicka,c, Andrew J. Carrolld, Jonathan E. Kolitze, Bayard L. Powellf, Richard M. Stoneg, Albert de la Chapelleh,i,2, John C. Byrda,c, and Clara D. Bloomfielda,c aThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210; bAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Statistics and Data Center, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210; cDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210; dDepartment of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294; eNorthwell Health Cancer Institute, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, NY 11042; fDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Hematology & Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157; gDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA 02215; hHuman Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; and iDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 Contributed by Albert de la Chapelle, August 28, 2020 (sent for review July 17, 2020; reviewed by Anne Hagemeijer and Stefan Klaus Bohlander) Balanced rearrangements involving the KMT2A gene, located at patterns that include high expression of HOXA genes and thereby 11q23, are among the most frequent chromosome aberrations in contribute to leukemogenesis (14–16).
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Entitled the Androgen Receptor
    A Dissertation entitled The Androgen Receptor as a Transcriptional Co-activator: Implications in the Growth and Progression of Prostate Cancer By Mesfin Gonit Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD Degree in Biomedical science Dr. Manohar Ratnam, Committee Chair Dr. Lirim Shemshedini, Committee Member Dr. Robert Trumbly, Committee Member Dr. Edwin Sanchez, Committee Member Dr. Beata Lecka -Czernik, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo August 2011 Copyright 2011, Mesfin Gonit This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Androgen Receptor as a Transcriptional Co-activator: Implications in the Growth and Progression of Prostate Cancer By Mesfin Gonit As partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD Degree in Biomedical science The University of Toledo August 2011 Prostate cancer depends on the androgen receptor (AR) for growth and survival even in the absence of androgen. In the classical models of gene activation by AR, ligand activated AR signals through binding to the androgen response elements (AREs) in the target gene promoter/enhancer. In the present study the role of AREs in the androgen- independent transcriptional signaling was investigated using LP50 cells, derived from parental LNCaP cells through extended passage in vitro. LP50 cells reflected the signature gene overexpression profile of advanced clinical prostate tumors. The growth of LP50 cells was profoundly dependent on nuclear localized AR but was independent of androgen. Nevertheless, in these cells AR was unable to bind to AREs in the absence of androgen.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure S17 Figure S16
    immune responseregulatingcellsurfacereceptorsignalingpathway ventricular cardiacmuscletissuedevelopment t cellactivationinvolvedinimmuneresponse intrinsic apoptoticsignalingpathway single organismalcelladhesion cholesterol biosyntheticprocess myeloid leukocytedifferentiation determination ofadultlifespan response tointerferongamma muscle organmorphogenesis endothelial celldifferentiation brown fatcelldifferentiation mitochondrion organization myoblast differentiation response toprotozoan amino acidtransport leukocyte migration cytokine production t celldifferentiation protein secretion response tovirus angiogenesis Scrt1 Tcf25 Dpf1 Sap30 Ing2 Zfp654 Sp9 Zfp263 Mxi1 Hes6 Zfp395 Rlf Ppp1r13l Snapc1 C030039L03Rik Hif1a Arrb1 Glis3 Rcor2 Hif3a Fbxo21 Dnajc21 Rest Sirt6 Foxj1 Kdm5b Ankzf1 Sos2 Plscr1 Jdp2 Rbbp8 Etv4 Msh5 Mafg Tsc22d3 Nupr1 Ddit3 Cebpg Zfp790 Atf5 Cebpb Atf3 Trim21 Irf9 Irf2 Tbx21 Stat2 Stat1 Zbp1 Irf1 aGOslimPos Ikzf3 Oasl1 Irf7 Trim30a Dhx58 Txk Rorc Rora Nr1d2 Setdb2 Vdr Vax2 Nr1d1 Foxs1 Eno1 Thap3 Nfkbil1 Edf1 Srebf1 Lbr Tead1 Zfp608 Pcx Ift57 Ssbp4 Stat3 Mxd1 Pml Ssh2 Chd7 Maf Cic Bcl3 Prkdc Mbd5 Ppfibp2 Foxp2 Tal2 Mlf1 Bcl6b Zfp827 Ikzf2 Phtf2 Bmyc Plagl2 Nfkb2 Nfkb1 Tox Nrip1 Utf1 Klf3 Plagl1 Nfkbib Spib Nfkbie Akna Rbpj Ncoa3 Id1 Tnp2 Gata3 Gata1 Pparg Id2 Epas1 Zfp280b Commons Pathway Erg GO MSigDB KEGG Hhex WikiPathways SetGene Databases Batf Aff3 Zfp266 gene modules other (hypergeometric TF, from Figure Trim24 Zbtb5 Foxo3 Aebp2 XPodNet -protein-proteininteractionsinthepodocyteexpandedbySTRING Ppp1r10 Dffb Trp53 Enrichment
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Assay of Progesterone Receptor in Human Mammary Carcinoma1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 37, 464-471 , February 1977] Characterization and Assay of Progesterone Receptor in Human Mammary Carcinoma1 M. F. Pichon and E. Milgrom Groupe de Recherches sur Ia Biochimie Endocrinienne et Ia Reproduction (INSERM U.135), FacultédeMédecine,Paris-Sud, 94270 Bicétre,France ever, only some patients are improved by such treatments. It SUMMARY would thus be of great practical importance to predict in advance which patient will respond and to nationalize the [3H]Pregn-4-ene-3,20-dione ([3Hjpmogestenane)-recepton choice of the surgical or pharmacological technique to be complexes from human mammary carcinoma were found to used. During the last 15 years, the detection and quantifica be stabilized in the presence of glycerol. The dissociation tion of estrogen receptors in mammary tumors have allowed rate constant was lowered and the equilibrium dissociation marked progress in this direction (11, 12, 16, 18, 21, 22, 34). constant was decreased (KD = 3 nM in the absence of However, the growth of mammary carcinoma may be can glycerol and 1.1 nM in the presence of 30% glycerol), traIled not only by estrogens but also by other hormones whereas no clean-cut effect on the association rate was including observed and no change occurred in the concentration andragens, glucacorticaids, pragestagens , and of binding sites. Gortisol was found to compete with prolactin (13). The study of specific receptors for these [3Hjpmagesterone only at concentrations higher than 1 @M. hormones should shed some bight on the problem of tumor This made it possible to distinguish [3H]pmogestemanebind hormonal dependence . The characterization and measu me ing to the receptor from binding to carticosteroid-binding ment of progesterone receptors have been hampered by the globulin.
    [Show full text]