DOCSLIB.ORG

Record of Decision (Rods)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Record of Decision (Rods) Final Record of Decision for Installation Restoration Site 28, Todd Shipyards Alameda Point Alameda, California September 2007 Prepared for: Base Realignment and Closure Program Management Office West San Diego, California Prepared under: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contract Number N68711-03-D-5104 Contract Task Order 093 SULT.5104.0093.0004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS..................................................................................... vii DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ D-1 SITE NAME AND LOCATION.............................................................................................. D-1 STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE ............................................................................... D-1 ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE ................................................................................................ D-2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY: ACTIVE REMEDIATION FOR SOIL AND ACTIVE REMEDIATION FOR GROUNDWATER........................................................ D-3 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS ........................................................................................ D-4 DATA CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST ................................................................................... D-5 1.0 SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION ........................................................ 1-1 1.1 SITE NAME............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 SITE LOCATION..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES ............................................... 2-1 2.1 SITE HISTORY ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 CERCLA Investigation Activities ........................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 RCRA Investigation Activities ................................................................ 2-5 2.2.3 EBS Investigation Activities.................................................................... 2-5 2.2.4 Alameda Point Base-wide Groundwater Monitoring Program................ 2-6 3.0 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION ................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD......................................................................... 3-1 3.2 PUBLIC MAILINGS................................................................................................. 3-2 3.3 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION FOR SITE 28 ............................................................ 3-2 4.0 SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT AND RESPONSE ACTION................... 4-1 5.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................................ 5-1 5.1 GEOLOGY.............................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY .................................................................................................. 5-2 5.3 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION IN SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ........... 5-2 Record of Decision for Site 28 i SULT.5104.0093.0004 Alameda Point TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 6.0 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE SITE AND RESOURCE USES.................. 6-1 6.1 LAND USES ........................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 GROUNDWATER USES ........................................................................................... 6-1 6.3 SURFACE WATER USES......................................................................................... 6-4 7.0 SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS......................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH .................................................. 7-1 7.1.1 Identification of COPCs........................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 Exposure Assessment............................................................................... 7-2 7.1.3 Toxicity Assessment ................................................................................ 7-3 7.1.4 Risk Characterization............................................................................... 7-4 7.2 SCREENING-LEVEL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH ......................... 7-6 7.3 POINT OF DEPARTURE ........................................................................................... 7-7 8.0 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES ............................................................................ 8-1 9.0 DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES..................................................... 9-1 9.1 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES FOR SOIL .................................................................... 9-2 9.1.1 Alternative S1 – No Action...................................................................... 9-2 9.1.2 Alternative S2 – ICs................................................................................. 9-2 9.1.3 Alternative S3 – Soil/Synthetic Membrane Cover with ICs.................... 9-2 9.1.4 Alternative S4a – Removal and Disposal of Soil to Achieve Unrestricted Site Use (0 to 6 feet bgs)..................................................... 9-3 9.1.5 Alternative S4b – Removal and Disposal of Soil to Achieve RAOs with ICs (0 to 2 feet bgs)............................................................... 9-3 9.1.6 Alternative S5 – Asphalt Cover with ICs ................................................ 9-3 9.1.7 Alternative S6 - Phytoremediation and ICs ............................................. 9-4 9.1.8 Alternative S7a – Ex-Situ Solidification/Stabilization of Excavated Soil (0 to 6 feet bgs) ............................................................... 9-4 9.1.9 Alternative S7b – Ex-Situ Solidification/Stabilization of Excavated Soil (0 to 2 feet bgs) ............................................................... 9-4 9.2 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES FOR GROUNDWATER .................................................. 9-5 9.2.1 Alternative GW1 – No Action ................................................................. 9-5 9.2.2 Alternative GW2 – Monitoring and ICs/Monitoring and ICs (Shoreline and Inland Areas) ................................................................... 9-5 9.2.3 Alternative GW3 – Monitoring and ICs/Soil Source Removal with Monitoring and ICs.................................................................................. 9-5 Record of Decision for Site 28 ii SULT.5104.0093.0004 Alameda Point TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 9.2.4 Alternative GW4 - Monitoring and ICs/Passive MIC Zone with Monitoring and ICs.................................................................................. 9-6 9.2.5 Alternative GW5 – Monitoring and ICs/Soil Source Removal and MIC with Monitoring and ICs ................................................................. 9-6 10.0 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES................................................. 10-1 10.1 COMPARISON OF SOIL ALTERNATIVES ................................................................ 10-1 10.1.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment................... 10-1 10.1.2 Compliance with ARARs ...................................................................... 10-2 10.1.3 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence ........................................... 10-2 10.1.4 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment .......... 10-2 10.1.5 Short-Term Effectiveness ...................................................................... 10-3 10.1.6 Implementability.................................................................................... 10-3 10.1.7 Cost ........................................................................................................ 10-3 10.1.8 State Acceptance.................................................................................... 10-4 10.1.9 Community Acceptance......................................................................... 10-4 10.2 COMPARISON OF GROUNDWATER ALTERNATIVES .............................................. 10-4 10.2.1 Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment................... 10-4 10.2.2 Compliance with ARARs ...................................................................... 10-4 10.2.3 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence ........................................... 10-4 10.2.4 Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment .......... 10-5 10.2.5 Short-Term Effectiveness ...................................................................... 10-5 10.2.6 Implementability.................................................................................... 10-6 10.2.7 Cost ........................................................................................................ 10-6 10.2.8 State Acceptance.................................................................................... 10-6 10.2.9 Community Acceptance......................................................................... 10-6 11.0 PRINCIPAL THREAT WASTE ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 CALIFORNIA RAILROADS (3) – SL 183 03.06.20 Page 1 of 23
    1 CALIFORNIA RAILROADS (3) – SL 183 03.06.20 page 1 of 23 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe (150-174), Western Pacific (175-179), Los Angeles & Salt Lake/Union Pacific (180-185) RRs, Short Line RRs (except those associated with North Western Pacific RR, see CA 2) in alphabetical order of operating company at end of passenger service (200-251), Interurban Electric Rly (255-263) and Key System (265-273) & Tourist(ex Logging) RRs (275-280). Great Northern (Malin-Bieber) see OR 52. Based on 1858 Dinsmore Guide (x), USA Official Guide (G)1875 (y), 1893G (z), Company Public (t) & Working (w) TTs as noted, 1976G (e) & current Amtrak TTs (f); j: current Los Angeles County Metro (LAM) Gold Line; k: current MetroLink (ML) SWG: 1901 South West California Guide. TD: 1899 Travelers Directory; q: 1884G. Former names: [ ] Distances in miles Gauge 4’ 8½” unless noted (date)>(date) start/end of passenger service op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass. passenger service Certain non-passenger locations shown in italics thus: (name) # Histories, Reference letters in brackets: (a), location shown in public timetable, but no trains stop. x-f = xyzabcdef etc. w? Working TT implies trains will make conditional stops but no s or f symbol shown. ATCHISON TOPEKA & SANTA FE (ATSF) [Haslett qz ] Based on PTTs 1896 (z), 1910 (a), 1922 (b), 1936 (c), 1954(d) 2059.5 Troy a and 1963 (e). Also,1904 (r), 1911(r2), 1916 (r3) 2065.6 Newberry za [Newbery q ] & WTTs 1896 (w), 1911 (w2), 1915 (w3), 1936 (w5) [Water ] 2071.6 Minneola za 150.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferryboat Memories: the Eureka Run Saucelito/Sausalito Two Ferry Tales
    Moments in Time SAUSALITO HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER SPRING 2009 Three Sausalito Ferries Saucelito/Sausalito Ferryboat Memories: Two Ferry Tales The Eureka Run The Saucelito, 1878-1884 he was called “the largest double-end passenger ferry he Saucelito was not the first ferry to come to the in the world” when she made her grand entry into the town of Sausalito, but she was the first brought to SSan Francisco Bay in 1922. A full 299.5 feet long, the Tserve a real commute system between Marin Coun- steamer Eureka could carry 2300 passengers. And when her ty and San Francisco. She and her sister ship San Rafael were main deck seats were removed, she could handle 120 “ma- ordered in 1877–78 by President Latham of the North Pacif- chines,” the term used in a 1922 press release to describe the ic Coast Railroad (NPCRR) to connect Marin train service new mode of transit of the early ‘20s, the automobile. In with ferry service to San Francisco. His idea was to create short, she was an impressive example of early mass transit. a “horseshoe,” or water/land loop, from San Francisco to With her seats back in place, she could accommodate 3500 southern Marin via either Sausalito (to San Anselmo Junc- people. tion) or Pt. San Quentin (to San Rafael). She and the Sacramento were the last “beam-engined” Our ferry tale begins with the building of the twin, 205 paddle-wheel ferries to be built on San Francisco Bay. For foot “luxury liners,” or single-ended ferries Saucelito and San 19 years, from 1922 to 1941, the Eureka was the chief work- Rafael, in Green Point, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Newsletter Fall 2015
    I S S U E N U m b E r 4 • F A L L 2 0 1 5 Failed RailRoad led to thRiving FerrY SeRvice by Dennis Evanosky Niles Canyon Railroad. On October 2, 1866 an inspection party visited the Western Pacific Railroad’s tracks in today’s Niles Canyon. The Western Pacific’s inability to finish this railroad through the canyon and on to Sacramento led to a decision to run the transcontinental n December 1862, Timothy railroad into Oakland, giving the East Bay ferries a near monopoly on getting passengers IDame, Peter Donahue and Charles into San Francisco. McLaughlin formed the Western Pacific Railroad (WP). These men were Jose and finally north up the peninsula boat industry, which had already been already busy building the San Francisco to San Francisco on SF&SJ tracks. carrying passengers from “Contra & San Jose Railroad (SF&SJ), which Costa,” as most called today’s East began running between San Francisco In 1866, the WP ran out of money after completing the first 20 miles of Bay, to and from San Francisco for 17 and Menlo Park in October 1863. The years. “Ferry service from San Francisco SF&SJ initiated service to San Jose in track. This forced the railroad to halt construction east of Vallejo Mills in the to the East Bay began in 1850, when January 1864. Ten months later, the Captain Thomas Gray began sailing Central Pacific Railroad (CP) gave the middle of the desolate canyon along Alameda Creek. The following year the small steamer Kangaroo from WP the rights to build a railroad that San Francisco to San Antonio Creek, connected Sacramento with San Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda's Narrow Gauge Railroad • Greet Newcomers and Inspire Zest for ➤ from the President’S Podium WE Alameda´S Rich and Fantastic History
    I S S U E N U m b E r 3 • SUm m E r 2 0 1 5 Al AmedA’s NArrow GAuGe rAilroAd by Dennis Evanosky SPC at Encinal & High Street. Image: Vernon Sappers Collection. n December 2, 1877, the first South Pacific the shoreline at today’s Fernside Boulevard and Encinal OCoast (SPC) train rolled through Alameda, nothing Avenue. The bridge swung open to accommodate boat serious, yet, a test run on the newly laid narrow-gauge traffic, mostly scow schooners and barges that traveled to tracks along Encinal Avenue from High Street to Park Clark’s Landing and Damon’s Landing; both were located Street. The run capped off almost five months of work near today’s Oakland Coliseum. that included laying four miles of track from Alameda Bay and Coast also built the “West End Wharf,” actually Point—about where passengers catch the ferry to San a pair of 1,000-foot-long wharves — one for freight, the Francisco today—south on modern-day Main Street and other for passengers — on the old shoreline near where then east on today’s Central and Encinal Avenues. today’s Main Street swings west near Bay Ship and Yacht. An SPC subsidiary, the Bay and Coast Railroad, built As you drive west on Main Street past the traffic light at the line north from Newark. The SPC connected Alameda the ferry terminal, you might imagine yourself on a wharf to West San Leandro and points south at first to Los Gatos with nothing but bay water beneath you.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Decision (Rods)
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE WEST 1455 FRAZEE RD, SUITE 900 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4310 5090 Ser BPMOW.mep/0026 1 5 0CT 2007 Ms. Anna-Marie Cook (3 copies) U.S. EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Ms. Dot Lofstrom (3 copies) Department ofToxic Substances Control 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95826-3200 Mr. John West San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1400 Oakland, CA 94612 Dear Ms. Cook, Ms. Lofstrom, and Mr. West: I am pleased to submit to you the Final Record ofDecision, Site 25 Soil, Alameda Point, Alameda, California dated September 2007. This Record ofDecision (ROD) documents the remedy for Site 25 soil and summarizes results of the remedial investigation and feasibility study. Unless otherwise noted, recipients receive one hard copy and one CD ofthe signed ROD. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Mary Parker, the Navy Project Manager, at 619­ 532-0945, or me at (619) 532-0907. THOMAS L. MACCHIARELLA BRAC Environmental Coordinator By direction ofthe Director Enclosure: 1. Final Record ofDecision, Site 25 Soil, Alameda Point, Alameda, California dated September 2007 5090 Ser BPMOW.mep/0026 15 OCT 2007 Copy to: Ms. Suzette Leith Mr. Kevin McDonald U.S. EPA Region 9 U.S. Coast Guard Housing Office 75 Hawthorne Street 99 Mosley Avenue San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Alameda, CA 94501 Mr. Yvan Le Mr. Leo Lozano U.S. Coast Guard Maintenance U.S. Coast Guard 130I Clay Street, Suite 700N 1301 Clay Street, Suite 700N Oakland, CA 94612 Oakland, CA 94612 Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Engineering Record
    SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD SIXTEENTH STREET STATION HABS CA-2805 1789 Sixteenth Street & 1601 Wood Street HABS CA-2805 Oakland Alameda County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY PACIFIC WEST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1111 Jackson Street, Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94607 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD SIXTEENTH STREET STATION HABS NO. CA‐2805 Location: 1798 Sixteenth Street / 1601 Wood Street, Oakland, Alameda County, California USGS 7.5 minute series – Oakland West, Calif. UTM Coordinates: 10 . 561970 . 4185380 Date of Construction: 1911‐12 Architect: Jarvis Hunt Present Owner: Union Pacific Railroad 1416 Dodge Street Omaha, Nebraska 68179‐0310 Present Use: Vacant Significance: The Southern Pacific Railroad Oakland Sixteenth Street Station is significant for its association with Oakland and East Bay growth in the years following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. It is also an excellent example of monumental civic architecture in the Beaux‐Arts Classical style, exhibiting high artistic merit in its design and ornamentation. The station and adjacent Sixteenth Street Tower (HAER No. CA‐2264) were determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places in 1990, under criteria A and C. Report Prepared By: John W. Snyder Senior Environmental Planner, Architectural History Studies California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street, Room 4301 Sacramento, California 95814 SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD SIXTEENTH STREET STATION HABS No. CA-2805 Page 2 I. DESCRIPTION The Southern Pacific Railroad’s Sixteenth Street Station in Oakland is of steel frame, reinforced concrete, and brick masonry construction. Above a base of polished black granite the walls are faced with Gladding‐McBean “Granitex” terra cotta on the north, south, and east sides, and Richmond Brick Company face brick on the west side.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PACIFIC WEST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S
    INTERURBAN ELECTRIC RAILWAY TWENTY-SIXTH STREET HAER CA-2266 JUNCTION BRIDGE HAER CA-2266 Foot of Twenty-Sixth Street, crossing Southern Pacific Railroad Main Line Tracks Oakland Alameda County California PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD PACIFIC WEST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1111 Jackson Street, Suite 700 Oakland, CA 94607 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD INTERURBAN ELECTRIC RAILWAY TWENTY‐SIXTH STREET JUNCTION BRIDGE HAER NO. CA‐2266 Location: Crossing southern Pacific Railroad main line tracks at the foot of Twenty‐sixth Street, Oakland, Alameda County, California USGS 7.5 minute series – Oakland West, Calif. UTM Coordinates: 10 . 562340 . 4186170 Date of Construction: 1938 Engineer: Department of Public Works, State of California Present Owner: State of California c/o Department of Transportation 111 Grand Avenue Oakland, California 94623 Present Use: The south leg of the bridge was demolished in 1994. The north leg remains, with a single track providing access from the West Oakland mainline tracks to the Oakland Terminal Railway’s Baldwin Yard. Significance: The Interurban Electric Railway Twenty‐sixth Street Junction Bridge is a rare surviving example – one of only two known in California – of a railroad wye carried by a bridge structure. The bridge was determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places in 1990, under criteria A and C. Report Prepared By: John W. Snyder Senior Environmental Planner, Architectural History Studies California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street, Room 4301 Sacramento, California 95814 INTERURBAN ELECTRIC RAILWAY TWENTY-SIXTH STREET JUNCTION BRIDGE HAER No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging San Francisco Bay 513~533 12 Bridge Opening 1 2 534~550 13 a Work in Progress
    www.PDHcenter.com PDHonline Course C577 www.PDHonline.org Table of Contents Slide/s Part Title/Description 1N/ATitle 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~36 1 Inland Sea 37~75 2 The Hoover-Young Commission 76~102 3 Design By Committee 103~118 4 West Bay Crossing 119~162 5 East Bay Crossing 163~231 6 Sub-Aqueous Piers 232~355 7 West Bay Construction 356~413 8 East Bay Construction 414~445 9 Contract No. 3 (SF) 446~492 10 Yerba Buena 493~512 11 Minor Contracts Bridging San Francisco Bay 513~533 12 Bridge Opening 1 2 534~550 13 A Work in Progress Satellite view of “The Inland Sea.” The entry to Suisun Bay the bay is through the San Pablo Bay Golden Gate Strait which separates the San Francisco peninsula from Marin Part 1 County (roughly three miles long by one mile Marin County wide). Collectively known Oakland as San Francisco Bay, it consists of three bays; San Inland Sea Golden Gate Strait Francisco Bay (south), San San Francisco Pablo Bay (north) and Suisun Bay (northeast). San Francisco Bay Northern California rivers Pacific Ocean deposit their fresh water into the bay creating 3 turbulent conditions. 4 Known as “Yerba Buena” (before the Gold Rush of 1849), San PROCLAMATION Francisco was a sleepy village of four hundred souls. The discovery of gold changed all that and San Francisco with its “Inland Sea” We, Norton I, Pei Gratia, Emperor of the United States and became the focus of the rush and by 1850, the population had Protector of Mexico, do order and direct that a suspension bridge be exploded to 30K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ederal Register Volume 2 Number 207 ‘Vc ^A/Iteo
    ^ V O N A L ^ A £ SCRIPTA % EDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 2 NUMBER 207 ‘VC ^A/ITEO / . 1 9 3 4 ^ Washington, Tuesday, October 26, 1937 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. E xecutive Order Armistice Day— 1937 DESIGNATING THE HONORABLE MARTIN TRAVIESO AS ACTING JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PUERTO By the President of the United States of America RICO FOR THE TRIAL OF THE CASE OF UNITED STAGES V. JU LIO A PROCLAMATION PINTO GANDIA, ET AL. WHEREAS November 11, 1937, is the nineteenth anniver­ By virtue of and pursuant to the authority invested in sary of the cessation of the most destructive, sanguinary, and me by section 41 of the act entitled “An Act To provide a civil government for Porto Rico, and for other purposes”, far-reaching war in human annals; and approved March 2, 1917 (39 Stat. 965), I hereby designate WHEREAS Senate Concurrent Resolution 18, Sixty-ninth and authorize the Honorable Martin Travieso, Associate Congress (44 Stat. 1982), passed June 4, 1926, provides: Justice of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, to perform and “That the President of the United States is requested discharge the duties of Judge of the District Court of the to issue a proclamation calling upon the officials to display United States for Puerto Rico in the trial of the case of the flag of the United States on all Government buildings United States v. Julio Pinto Gandía. Juan Alamo, Manuel on November 11 and inviting the people of the United Avila, Raimundo Dias Pacheco, Santiago Nieves Malsan, Julio Mange Hernandez, Dionisio Velez Aviles, Jesus Casellas States to observe the day in schools and churches, or other Torres, Aníbal Arsuaga Casellas.
    [Show full text]
  • Todd Shipyard, Southern Pacific Company West Alameda Yard) HAER NO
    United Engineering Company Shipyard HAER No. CA-295 (Todd Shipyard, Southern Pacific Company UACR. West Alameda Yard) /7/ffc/N 2900 Main Street C/\ L. Alameda / ~ AU\M , Alameda County ^ ' California * ~~ PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior San Francisco, California UNITED ENGINEERING COMPANY SHIPYARD (Todd Shipyard, Southern Pacific Company West Alameda Yard) HAER NO. CA-295 (Page 1) HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD cAL. UNITED ENGINEERING COMPANY SHIPYARD /,/j^/W (Todd Shipyard, Southern Pacific Company West Alameda Yard) ^ _ f HAER No. CA-295 ' Location: Oakland Inner Harbor — South Side 2900 Main Street Alameda Alameda County California U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute Oakland West, Calif, quadrangle Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Zone 10:562,220 mE/ 4,182,650 mN, NW corner 562,530 mE/4,182,410 mN, S corner 562,780 mE/ 4,182,670 mN, E corner Date of Construction: 1910-1915; conversion to shipyard and expansion 1941-1945. Engineers & Architects Southern Pacific Company; United Engineering Company, Alben Froberg, John Hudspeth, Austin Wilmott Earl, and others. Builders: Southern Pacific Company; United Engineering Company, American Dredging Company, and others. Present Owners: 074-0891-003 074-0905-001-04 City of Alameda Alameda Gateway Ltd. City Hall 2900 Main Street Alameda, CA 94501 Alameda, CA 94501 Present Use: Ship repair yard (Bay Ship & Yacht Co.) and 44 smaller tenants. Significance: The United Engineering Company Shipyard, established in 1941 to build and repair ships for the U.S. Navy, is the last surviving of several large World War II shipyards in Alameda.
    [Show full text]
  • Repurpose and Restoration of Abandoned Railroads
    From Nothing to Something Repurpose and Restoration of Abandoned Railroads 1 3 Elaine Palacios UC Davis Landascape Architecture Senior Thesis 2013 5 Presented to the faculty of the Landscape Architecture Department of the University of California, Davis, in partial fulfillment of the requiremnts for the Degree of Bachlors of Science in Lanscape Architecture. Accepted and Approved by Stephen Wheeler, Senior Project Faculty Advisor Jennifer de Graaf, Committee Member Brett Milligan, Committee Member Michael Rios, Committee Member 7 TABLE OF CONTENT I Signature Page II Table of Content III List of Illustrations IV Abstract V Acknowledgements Section One: Introduction Section Two: Background Section Three: Project Description Section Four: Current Conditions Section Five: Case Studies Section Six: Design Ideas 9 Section Seven: Final Design LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: Rails, pg 4, http://static6.depositphotos.com/1059667/587/i/950/depositphotos_5872623-Texture-of-railway-tracks-on-gravel.jpg Figure 2: Alameda Theater, pg 17, http://pp2.walk.sc/full/production/51093.jpg Figure 3: California, pg 20, E. Palacios Figure 4: Island of Alameda, pg 20, E. Palacios Figure 5: Site, pg 21, E. Palacios Figure 6: Alameda main area of trains, pg 23, http://picture.abandonedrails.com/19h22pvl.jpg Figure 7: Rails and Nature, pg 29, http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qHCi3HqcVCE/UXrRjvRt_DI/AAAAAAAACU8/TDjDZoWswbQ/s1600/IMG_1031.JPG Figure 8: Picture of site, pg 33, E. Palacios Figure 9: Street graphic, pg 34, E. Palacios Figure 10: Zoing graphic, pg 35, E. Palacios Figure 11: Census graphic, pg 37, E. Palacios Figure 12: Surrounding businesses graphic, pg 38, E. Palacios Figure 13: Available transportation graphic, pg 39, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory to the Bird-Life of the San Francisco Bay Region
    _‘ --_ - -_-. -. ._ I- _- ___--_~ ~__I------.___ - _ y_Y_ ~.~I.----- - -a~. COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL CLUB PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA NUMBER 18 DIRECTORY TO THE BIRD-LIFE OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION BY JOSEPH GRINNELL AND MARGARET W. WYTHF CONIRIRUTION’ NO. 4Y3 FROM THE MUSEUM OF VERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Published by the Club March 29, 1927 Edited by JOSEPH GRINNELL and HARRY S. SWARTH at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology University of Colifmnia NOTE PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA No. 18 is the eighteenth in a series of publications issued by the Cooper Ornithological Club for the accommodation of papers whose length prohibits their appearance in THE CONDOR. For information regarding either series of Cooper Club publications address W. Lee Chambers, Business Manager, Drawer 123, Eagle Rock, Los Angeles County, California. CONTENTS PAGE Frontispiece: Commuter’s View of Common Gulls of San Francisco Bay . ..... .... .................................................................... facing title, 1 Preface ... ... .. ........................................................................................................ 5 Introduction . .. ........................................................................................................ 7 Map of the “San Francisco Bay Region”. ............................................................. 7 Books Recommended . ... ........................................................................................ 8 Bibliography of Published Local Lists.. ..............
    [Show full text]