Directory to the Bird-Life of the San Francisco Bay Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Directory to the Bird-Life of the San Francisco Bay Region _‘ --_ - -_-. -. ._ I- _- ___--_~ ~__I------.___ - _ y_Y_ ~.~I.----- - -a~. COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL CLUB PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA NUMBER 18 DIRECTORY TO THE BIRD-LIFE OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION BY JOSEPH GRINNELL AND MARGARET W. WYTHF CONIRIRUTION’ NO. 4Y3 FROM THE MUSEUM OF VERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA Published by the Club March 29, 1927 Edited by JOSEPH GRINNELL and HARRY S. SWARTH at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology University of Colifmnia NOTE PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA No. 18 is the eighteenth in a series of publications issued by the Cooper Ornithological Club for the accommodation of papers whose length prohibits their appearance in THE CONDOR. For information regarding either series of Cooper Club publications address W. Lee Chambers, Business Manager, Drawer 123, Eagle Rock, Los Angeles County, California. CONTENTS PAGE Frontispiece: Commuter’s View of Common Gulls of San Francisco Bay . ..... .... .................................................................... facing title, 1 Preface ... ... .. ........................................................................................................ 5 Introduction . .. ........................................................................................................ 7 Map of the “San Francisco Bay Region”. ............................................................. 7 Books Recommended . ... ........................................................................................ 8 Bibliography of Published Local Lists.. ............... ................................................ 9 Libraries of Ornithology. ... .. ........................................................................... 17 Public Museums . ........ ... .................................................................................... 19 Acknowledgments . .......... ................................................................................... 19 Systematic List of the Species and Subspecies............ ............................................... 21 The General Directory . ........... ..... _..... .. .. ..... ...................................................... 35 Scope ........... ............................................................................................................ 35 Summary ....... ..... ... ......................... _.. .. .. .................................................. 149 Index ........ ...................................................................................... _......... .................... 151 PREFACE The purpose of the present contribution is to provide help and incentive toward an increased knowledge of the bird-life of the San Francisco Bay region. While something may be said for the plan adopted by some students of bird-life, to prosecute their inquiries independently of anyone else, it is the conviction of the present writers that the best procedure on the part of the average student is to acquaint himself as fast and as thoroughly as he can with the findings of other students, those that have preceded him. A main aim in the present paper, therefore, is to give clues as to the literature already available in regard to each kind of bird in the limited territory covered. This is not, therefore, simply a list of birds that have been found to occur in the region, more or less annotated from the standpoint of the museum collector, but it is primarily an accumulation of facts and citations of a sort thought likely to prove useful to the student of the living bird. This is meant as no disparagement of the worthiness of the efforts of the collector and systematist ; for their work is essential, especially in the initial stages in the development of the general field of ornithology. If, as is the authors’ earnest wish, future students of the bird-life in the Bay region make full use of the index feature of the present paper, they will quickly be led to the same conclusion that has forced itself upon us, namely, that knowledge of the life histories of even our commonest birds is as yet deplorably meager. There is greatly needed a concentration of attention, on the part of those with the time and talent to study wild birds out-of-doors, upon this phase of ornithology. Beside the facts and interpretations comprised in the natural history of individual species, there are the more general problems concerned with the inter-relations between different species and with the changes in relative numbers under the altering of conditions which accompany the close settlement of the country by the white man. Field observations, accurately made, carefully recorded, and finally published in concise form constitute at this time an exceedingly desirable kind of contribution to the science of ornithology. If the present contribution will prove to have aided accom- plishment in this direction, its purpose will be realized. JOSEPH GRINNELL. MARGARET W. WYTHE. November 20, 1926. INTRODUCTION A first thing naturally necessary in an undertaking of the present sort is to fix arbitrarily the limits of the region dealt with. The “San Francisco Bay region” has been determined upon by us as including the nine counties which border in any measure upon San Francisco Bay, namely, the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa, Solano, Napa, Sonoma, and Marin; also the nearby Farallon Islands. The entire area of each of the counties named is taken into account. COUNTIES A Alameda CC Contra Costa fFg%?g M Marin Mo Monterey SJ San Joaquin ti Merced- SI Soleno N Nape SM San Mete0 P Placer Sn Sonoma S San Francisco St Stanislaus Sa Sacramento Y YOIO MAP OF “SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION”: THE NINE INCLUDED COUNTIESOUTLINED BOLDLY. lb 4a 4b 5 6 8a 86 Parifir Coa-I 4vifauna So. 18 COMMUTERS’ VIEW OF COMMON GULLS OF SAN FRAKCISCO B.41 la, lb, Heermann Gull; 2, Short-billed Mew Gull; 3, Ring-billed Gull; 4a, 4b, American Herring Gull; 5, California Gull; 6, Glaucous-winged Gull; 7, Northern Western Gull; 8a, 8b, Bonaparte Gull. 8 PACIFIC COAST AVIFAUNA No. 18 no matter how far from the Bay proper its limits may extend. However, as it turns out (see accompanying map) the area thus delimited is not so irregular as might have been expected; indeed, it proves to have a fair degree of avifaunal individuality, when comparison is made with other sections of California. In the General Directory, which forms the main part of our contribution, we have aimed to include all the species and subspecies authentically known to have occurred anywhere within the area outlined. We consider authenticity established when based upon a record in the literature, or a specific observation, made by an ornithologist of known experience, or upon one or more specimens of the species, with satisfactory data attached, preserved in a public or private museum. For reasons that it is unnecessary here to go into, the statements of sportsmen or of writers of so-called popular natural history have not, as a rule, been considered as providing satisfactory evidence of the occurrence of rare or unusual birds within our limits. This may account for certain omissions that the critical student may discover. At the same time, it is always possible that we have overlooked some really authentic “record” that should have been included. No doubt we have; and for such lapses we have no apology to offer save that, by reason of the great volume of both published and unpub- lished sources that have had to be gone over, escape of a certain, though let us hope small, percentage of important facts seems inevitable. BOOKS RECOMMENDED As a matter of personal history with many advanced bird students of the present day, the one book that has proved of outstanding worth in furnishing a foundation of ornithological knowledge has been Elliott Coues’ classic “Key to North American Birds” (many editions, from 1872 down to the last, 1903, Dana Estes, Boston). Be- cause of the critical scholarship that characterized its authorship, and because of the wide range of subjects covered, descriptive, systematic, morphologic, biographical, and as pertaining to the technique of field collecting, Coues’ Key may still, we think, be recommended as the bird book to possess, if no other volume were ever to be owned. In the purely systematic field, the one inclusive work is Robert Ridgway’s “Birds of North and Middle America”, 8 vo 1umes to date (Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1901-1919). Since for most people this work will probably prove unnecessarily technical, we would recommend that such persons use, at least at the outset, for the identification of species, Florence Merriam Bailey’s “Handbook of Birds of the Western United States” (Houghton Mifflin, 1902, and many subsequent editions). Also, there are many popular guides, of more or less merit, which we are assured have been varyingly helpful to beginning students in bringing acquaintance with our species by name. Of help f rom the general geographical standpoint is the official American Ornithologists’ Union “Check-list of North American Birds” (last edition, New York, 1910; a new edition shortly to appear). Of more local bearing, and including a discussion of the laws of distribution, is J. Grinnell’s “A Distribu- tional List of the Birds of California” (Pacific Coast Avifauna No. 11, 1915). When it comes to the natural history of our birds, the field of knowledge which deals with the bird in life (and this is, of course, the main one in ornithology), there is a very large number of books seemingly available.
Recommended publications
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility Guide San Francisco and San Mateo Counties 2016
    National Park Service Accessibility Guide U.S. Department of the Interior San Francisco & San Mateo Counties 2016 Golden Gate National Recreation Area 02 Golden Gate National Recreation Area Accessibility Guide Table of Contents Welcome to Golden Gate National Recreation Area ..................4 General Park Information..............................................................5 Contact Information......................................................................5 Accessibility Definitions................................................................6 American Sign Language Requests..............................................6 Beach Wheelchair Requests..........................................................7 Seasonal Beach Mats....................................................................8 Service Animals.............................................................................9 Other Power Mobility Device (OPMD) ...................................... 10 Accessible Features by Park Location.........................................11 The information contained in this guide is current as of July 2016. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Accessibility Guide 03 Welcome to Golden Gate National Recreation Area Welcome to Golden Gate National Recreation Area! Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) spans three counties and is comprised of many parks that contain historic, cultural and/or environmental significance. GGNRA strives for full and equal participation for all visitors and continually upgrades facilities
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council
    Sonoma-Marin Coastal Regional Sediment Management Report Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council February 2018 Report Citation GFNMS Advisory Council, 2018. Sonoma-Marin Coastal Regional Sediment Management Report. Report of the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council for the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. San Francisco, CA. 197 pp. Cover photos (top left) Bodega Harbor Dredging, Cea Higgins (top right) Gleason Beach area, Doug George (bottom left) Aerial view of Stinson Beach and Seadrift, Bob Wilson (bottom right) Bolinas Highway revetment, Kate Bimrose This work was made possible with support from: i Sonoma-Marin Coastal Regional Sediment Management Working Group Members Chair: Cea Higgins, Sonoma Coast Surfrider; Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS) Advisory Council Hattie Brown, Sonoma County Regional Parks Jon Campo, Marin County Parks Clif Davenport, Coastal Sediment Management Workgroup Ashley Eagle-Gibbs, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin Brook Edwards, Wildlands Conservancy Leslie Ewing, California Coastal Commission Luke Farmer, Wildlands Conservancy Shannon Fiala, California Coastal Commission Stefan Galvez, Caltrans Brannon Ketcham, National Park Service, Point Reyes National Seashore John Largier, UC Davis Bodega Marine Lab, Sanctuary Advisory Council chair Neil Lassettre, Sonoma County Water Agency Bob Legge, Russian Riverkeeper Jack Liebster, County of Marin Planning Department Jeannine Manna, California Coastal Commission Abby Mohan,
    [Show full text]
  • California State Waters Map Series: Offshore of Pacifica, California
    California State Waters Map Series—Offshore of Pacifica, California By Brian D. Edwards, Eleyne L. Phillips, Peter Dartnell, H. Gary Greene, Carrie K. Bretz, Rikk G. Kvitek, Stephen R. Hartwell, Samuel Y. Johnson, Guy R. Cochrane, Bryan E. Dieter, Ray W. Sliter, Stephanie L. Ross, Nadine E. Golden, Janet T. Watt, John L. Chin, Mercedes D. Erdey, Lisa M. Krigsman, Michael W. Manson, and Charles A. Endris (Susan A. Cochran and Brian D. Edwards, editors) Pamphlet to accompany Open-File Report 2014–1260 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Edwards, B.D., Phillips, E.L., Dartnell, P., Greene, H.G., Bretz, C.K., Kvitek, R.G., Hartwell, S.R., Johnson, S.Y., Cochrane, G.R., Dieter, B.E., Sliter, R.W., Ross, S.L., Golden, N.E., Watt, J.T., Chin, J.L., Erdey, M.D., Krigsman, L.M., Manson, M.W., and Endris, C.A. (S.A. Cochran and B.D. Edwards, eds.), 2014, California State Waters Map Series—Offshore of Pacifica, California: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CALIFORNIA RAILROADS (3) – SL 183 03.06.20 Page 1 of 23
    1 CALIFORNIA RAILROADS (3) – SL 183 03.06.20 page 1 of 23 PASSENGER STATIONS & STOPS Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe (150-174), Western Pacific (175-179), Los Angeles & Salt Lake/Union Pacific (180-185) RRs, Short Line RRs (except those associated with North Western Pacific RR, see CA 2) in alphabetical order of operating company at end of passenger service (200-251), Interurban Electric Rly (255-263) and Key System (265-273) & Tourist(ex Logging) RRs (275-280). Great Northern (Malin-Bieber) see OR 52. Based on 1858 Dinsmore Guide (x), USA Official Guide (G)1875 (y), 1893G (z), Company Public (t) & Working (w) TTs as noted, 1976G (e) & current Amtrak TTs (f); j: current Los Angeles County Metro (LAM) Gold Line; k: current MetroLink (ML) SWG: 1901 South West California Guide. TD: 1899 Travelers Directory; q: 1884G. Former names: [ ] Distances in miles Gauge 4’ 8½” unless noted (date)>(date) start/end of passenger service op. opened; cl. closed; rn. renamed; rl. relocated; tm. terminus of service at date shown; pass. passenger service Certain non-passenger locations shown in italics thus: (name) # Histories, Reference letters in brackets: (a), location shown in public timetable, but no trains stop. x-f = xyzabcdef etc. w? Working TT implies trains will make conditional stops but no s or f symbol shown. ATCHISON TOPEKA & SANTA FE (ATSF) [Haslett qz ] Based on PTTs 1896 (z), 1910 (a), 1922 (b), 1936 (c), 1954(d) 2059.5 Troy a and 1963 (e). Also,1904 (r), 1911(r2), 1916 (r3) 2065.6 Newberry za [Newbery q ] & WTTs 1896 (w), 1911 (w2), 1915 (w3), 1936 (w5) [Water ] 2071.6 Minneola za 150.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferryboat Memories: the Eureka Run Saucelito/Sausalito Two Ferry Tales
    Moments in Time SAUSALITO HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER SPRING 2009 Three Sausalito Ferries Saucelito/Sausalito Ferryboat Memories: Two Ferry Tales The Eureka Run The Saucelito, 1878-1884 he was called “the largest double-end passenger ferry he Saucelito was not the first ferry to come to the in the world” when she made her grand entry into the town of Sausalito, but she was the first brought to SSan Francisco Bay in 1922. A full 299.5 feet long, the Tserve a real commute system between Marin Coun- steamer Eureka could carry 2300 passengers. And when her ty and San Francisco. She and her sister ship San Rafael were main deck seats were removed, she could handle 120 “ma- ordered in 1877–78 by President Latham of the North Pacif- chines,” the term used in a 1922 press release to describe the ic Coast Railroad (NPCRR) to connect Marin train service new mode of transit of the early ‘20s, the automobile. In with ferry service to San Francisco. His idea was to create short, she was an impressive example of early mass transit. a “horseshoe,” or water/land loop, from San Francisco to With her seats back in place, she could accommodate 3500 southern Marin via either Sausalito (to San Anselmo Junc- people. tion) or Pt. San Quentin (to San Rafael). She and the Sacramento were the last “beam-engined” Our ferry tale begins with the building of the twin, 205 paddle-wheel ferries to be built on San Francisco Bay. For foot “luxury liners,” or single-ended ferries Saucelito and San 19 years, from 1922 to 1941, the Eureka was the chief work- Rafael, in Green Point, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Earth Was Made: the San Andreas Fault How the Earth Was
    Name: Pd. Date: How the Earth Was Made: The San Andreas Fault While watching the movie video, answer the follow questions. # Question Answer 1 When the earthquake hit San Francisco in 1906, besides the obvious building problems, what was the other danger that the people faced? 2 What was the San Andreas fault named after? 3 Why is Mussel Rock important? 4 What is the process called where the Pacific plate was diving under the North American plate? 5 How long is the San Andreas fault? 6 How long have earthquakes been occurring along the San Andreas? 7 What is the significance of the altered path of the Carrizo Creek? 8 How much has the creek moved? 9 Which town along the fault has never had an earthquake? 10 Why is Parkfield, CA so important? 11 Why is serpentenite an important rock where plates move? 12 Why is the data collected in the Coachella Valley so important? 13 How long has it been since there was a large earthquake in the Coachella Valley? 14 About how many people live in the earthquake prone areas in California? 15 How many people died in the Northridge earthquake? 16 What was the magnitude of the 1906 earthquake in San Francisco? 17 To what is the shock wave produced by an earthquake compared? Name: KEY Pd. Date: https://moviesheets.comHow the Earth Was Made: The San Andreas Fault Geolog y Header While watching the movie video, answer the follow questions. # Question Answer 1 When the earthquake hit San Francisco in 1906, fires besides the obvious building problems, what was the other danger that the people faced? 2 What was the San Andreas fault named after? a lake – Laguna de San Andreas 3 Why is Mussel Rock important? It marks the spot where the fault comes back on land after being in the sea.
    [Show full text]
  • James P. Delgado
    JAMES P. DELGADO Forty-four years of working to explore, locate, study and preserve history for the benefit of all people by encouraging public access, involvement, and appreciation. EDUCATION Ph.D. (Archaeology), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, 2006. M.A. History (Maritime History and Underwater Research), East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, 1985. B.A. History (American History), San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, magna cum laude, 1981. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Senior Vice President, SEARCH, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida, May 2017- Member of the senior leadership team. Responsible for the scientific integrity of the company. Oversees international initiatives. Develops new business opportunities. Provides creative input and guidance. Director of Maritime Heritage, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland-October 2010-April 2017. Developed and implemented programs that interpreted and characterized maritime heritage resource in the sanctuary system. Designed and executed projects to locate and identify maritime heritage resources within and outside national marine sanctuaries. Promoted a wide application of program results through publications, presentations, or authoritative reports or policies. Managed the maritime heritage program and served as a senior member of the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries leadership team. Established policies on the protection of maritime heritage resources. Independently
    [Show full text]
  • Rodeo Valley, Marin Headlands & Easkoot Creek, Stinson Beach
    Habitat Restoration Team 2019 April-June Schedule Volunteer Programs are every Sunday, 9:30 am-2:30 pm and every 2nd and 4th (and 5th) Tuesday, 10 am-2 pm. March 2019 March 17 (Sunday) –Easkoot Creek, Stinson Beach. Bring something to share for the pot luck. We’ll do some weeding to maintain restored stream side Steelhead habitat. Tour One Tam's great Cape-ivy control work and see amazing native plantings at the new septic site. Meet at the Stinson Beach central parking lot. Map Link March 24 (Sunday) – Presidio Stables & Fort Barry, Marin Headlands. Today we protect important endangered Mission blue butterfly habitat! We will pull broom in two sites to protect amazing habitat. Fantastic progress has been achieved by HRT in the last 25 years! Meet at the Gerbode Trailhead parking lot across from Presidio Stables. Map Link March 26 (Tuesday) – Upper TV, Tennessee Valley. The onset of spring brings abundant opportunities to help out with various ongoing projects in Tennessee Valley. Meet at TV parking lot. Map Link March 31 (Sunday) – Morning Sun to Gerbode Valley, Marin Headlands. Amazing wildflowers will reward us! We'll hike or caravan up the ridge and remove broom as we go to protect endangered butterfly habitat above Gerbode Valley. Meet at the commuter lot on the west side of highway 101 at Spencer Ave exit. Map Link April 2019 April 7 (Sunday) – Fairfax-Bolinas, Bolinas Ridge. Your help is needed to pull French broom and search for veldt grass as we continue to transform this 5 acre broom invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT Habitat Restoration Team Workday Schedule
    Habitat Restoration Team 2020 January-March Schedule Volunteer programs are every Sunday 9:30 am – 2:30 pm and every 2nd and 4th (and 5th) Tuesday, 10 am-2 pm. January 2020 January 5 (Sunday) – Rodeo Valley, Marin Headlands: We’ll rove the rich coastal valley and bluffs of Wolf Ridge and remove small patches of Cape-ivy, ice plant, veldt grass, broom, jubata grass, and other exotics. Meet at the Coastal trailhead at Rodeo Beach. Map Link January 12 (Sunday) – Fairfax-Bolinas Road, Bolinas Ridge: Your help is needed to plant natives and pull broom as we continue to transform this 5-acre French broom invasion. Wonderful oak woodlands and patches of prairie grace this slope with Bolinas Lagoon and migratory bird views. Meet on Fairfax Road pullout near Hwy 1. Map Link January 14 (Tuesday) – Vista de Valle, Tennessee Valley: Your help is needed to stabilize the soil, expand native habitat, and re-wild the Wildland-Urban interface by planting at this former landslide site! Meet at end of Vista de Valle. Map Link January 19 (Sunday) – Kirby Cove Campground, Marin Headlands: Your help will protect amazing Headlands habitat! We will be seeding and mulching down at the cove today. Meet at Kirby Cove gate on Conzelman at Battery Spencer. Map Link January 26 (Sunday) – Camp Bicentennial and Battery Wallace, Marin Headlands. We’ll stop the veldt grass invasion from taking over this lovely point. Views of the Golden Gate channel will reward us. Meet at Camp Bicentennial picnic site. Map Link January 28 (Tuesday) – Vista de Valle, Tennessee Valley: Get your fill of infilling native plants with another planting day at the lesser-trafficked eastern heights of Tennessee Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    NORTH COAST PRE-MLPA COMMUNITY-BASED SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERIZATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT - Final Report - Prepared for The County of Humboldt Headwaters Fund by IMPACT ASSESSMENT, INC. 2166 Avenida de la Playa, Suite F La Jolla, California 92037 [email protected] December 2010 IMPACT ASSESSMENT, INC. 2166 Avenida de la Playa, Suite F La Jolla, California 92037 Ms. Dawn Elsbree, Coordinator Humboldt County Headwaters Fund 520 E Street Eureka, California 95501 December 31, 2010 Dear Ms. Elsbree: We are pleased to submit this Final Technical Report for the project entitled North Coast Pre- MLPA Community-Based Socioeconomic Characterization and Risk Assessment. The attached report documents the human and physical environmental context within which the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) is being implemented along the North Coast, and it assesses the potential effects of the candidate MPAs delineated in the Revised Round Three North Coast Regional Stakeholder Group Proposal (the Revised North Coast Proposal or RNCP). The descriptive materials and analyses provided in this report are intended to enable well- informed decisions regarding the RNCP and/or any proposed configuration of marine reserves that may be considered for implementation along the North Coast per stipulations in the MLPA. Please note that we have exerted extensive time and energy to make the report as useful as possible for planners and other decision-makers who seek to maximize the social and economic benefits of the MLPA process across the North Coast region. We hope that the materials may also prove useful to Headwaters Fund staff and representatives of other North Coast agencies and entities who require valid information for various other near-term and long-range planning purposes.
    [Show full text]