DOCSLIB.ORG

A Guide to School Choice Reforms Reforms Choice School to Guide a Schools) and the US (Charter Schools)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Guide to School Choice Reforms Reforms Choice School to Guide a Schools) and the US (Charter Schools) School choice reform will be a key issue at the next General Election, yet the debate so far has focused on the theoretical arguments for and against creating a ‘schools market’ by bringing more independent providers into the state system. The purpose of this report is to learn the lessons of existing school reforms in England (the academies programme), Sweden (free A guide to school choice reforms schools) and the US (charter schools). We assess the success of reforms in all three countries against seven criteria which we believe a schools market should meet in order to find the right balance between promoting innovation and choice while maintaining accountability and quality control. A guide to school None of the countries studied have achieved this balance yet, though in each case the introduction of new providers to the choice reforms system has brought benefits, but all of the seven criteria are met by at least one country. By combining the best aspects of Daisy Meyland-Smith and Natalie Evans each system, we argue, it is possible to develop a set of school Xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx choice reforms that will increase diversity and performance while protecting against market failure. Daisy Meyland-Smith and Natalie Evans £10.00 ISBN: 978-1-906097-42-4 Policy Exchange Policy Exchange Clutha House 10 Storey’s Gate London SW1P 3AY www.policyexchange.org.uk PX - A GUIDE TO SHCOOL - COVER 02-09.indd 1 20/2/09 10:46:35 A guide to school choice reforms Daisy Meyland-Smith and Natalie Evans Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Charles Moore (Chairman of the Board), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Richard Ehrman, Robin Edwards, George Robinson, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson, Rachel Whetstone, Virginia Fraiser, Andrew Sells, Simon Wolfson. A guide to school choice reforms About the authors Daisy Meyland-Smith Natalie Evans Daisy is a research fellow in the Education Natalie Evans is Deputy Director of unit. Her work currently focuses on meth- Policy Exchange, responsible for the out- ods of introducing quality, competition and put and strategic direction of the research diversity into the education sector, particu- team. larly through the judicious use of profit. Prior to joining PX she was Head Prior to joining Policy Exchange, Daisy of Policy at the British Chambers of was a Press and Parliamentary Officer for Commerce. She has also previously been the Conservative group in the National Deputy Director at the Conservative Assembly for Wales. Research Department specialising in wel- She has a first class degree from the fare and economic issues. University of Bath, where she read Politics She has a degree in Social and Political with Economics. Sciences from Cambridge University. © Policy Exchange 2009 Published by Policy Exchange, Clutha House, 10 Storey’s Gate, London SW1P 3AY www.policyexchange.org.uk ISBN: 978-1-906097-42-4 Printed by Heron, Dawson and Sawyer Designed by SoapBox, www.soapboxcommunications.co.uk 2 Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction 6 1. Academies 9 2. Sweden 23 3. USA 36 Lessons and recommendations 54 Appendix A 63 Appendix B 64 Appendix C 68 www.policyexchange.org.uk • 3 A guide to school choice reforms Executive Summary School choice reform will be a key issue at The Ten Key Lessons the next General Election, yet the debate We believe that it is possible to develop so far has focused on the theoretical argu- a programme that adopts the best aspects ments for and against creating a ‘schools of all three systems and could be imple- market’ by bringing more independent mented in this country. We draw ten key providers into the state system. The pur- lessons from our research: pose of this report is to learn the lessons of existing school reforms in England 1. Once established ISFS (Independent (the academies programme), Sweden (free State-Funded School) systems grow stead- schools) and the US (charter schools). ily and reforms are difficult to reverse: In The first three chapters assess the success the US there are now 4,568 charter schools of reforms in all three countries against educating 1,341,687 children. In Sweden, seven criteria which we believe a schools where there are fewer barriers to setting up market should meet in order to find the new schools, approximately 11.9% of chil- right balance between promoting innova- dren are educated in 3,302 free schools and tion, choice and diversity while maintain- pre-schools. ing accountability and quality control. It should be: 2. Most studies of attainment in ISFS show a positive effect 1. Demand-led 2. Easy to Enter 3. A system based on independent 3. Accountable state-funded schools moves naturally 4. Genuinely free towards federation: In Sweden, where 5. Financially consistent and stable there are few barriers to the creation 6. Politically stable of federations, the majority of schools 7. Fair are now run by for-profit companies and the vast majority of new applications None of the countries studied have are for this type of school. In the US achieved this balance yet, though in each there are much stronger barriers but still case the introduction of new providers to as many as 30% of charter schools are the system has brought benefits. The chart involved with management organisations below shows a summary of our findings: in some capacity. Easy to Genuinely Financially Politically Demand-led Accountable Fair enter free consistent stable UK X X USA /* /* X X Sweden X X X indicates that the evidence on whether a system passes the given test is mixed * These categories have been given two ratings because of the huge difference between states that have multiple-authorisers and are, therefore, more demand-led and accountable, and states that only allow school districts to authorise. 4 Executive summary 4. ISFS in federations seem to perform Our Recommendations better than one-offs Our first recommendation is that it makes sense to think of school choice 5. Allowing commercial companies to reform as a series of stages rather than set-up ISFS significantly boosts the a ‘big bang’. That way the system can potential for federations to develop: be developed in a coherent fashion For-profit groups are much more likely to rather than reactively in the face of unex- have the scale and ambition necessary to pected difficulties. create multi-school federations. Stage 1) Immediately reform the acad- 6. The authorising/commissioning emies programme by removing barriers process is crucial for the success of ISFS to entry and developing a transparent reform: The best approach, we argue, commissioning process. The DCSF would is that taken by US states which have identify, in a transparent manner, those multiple authorisers. This is because schools it wishes to become academies schools can approach more than one and initiate a public bidding process for authoriser, so reducing the risk to diver- sponsors. Clear criteria for bidders should sity, but authorisers themselves are in be stated, with preference given to those competition and so typically take a more already running successful academies. For- rigorous approach to accountability profit companies should be allowed to bid and oversight. to boost supply. 7. Existing local government providers Stage 2) Transfer the oversight of acad- should not be able to veto provision but emies to a variety of local and regional also should not be prevented from par- authorisers. As the academies programme ticipating in reforms: In all three coun- expands it will become impossible for the tries, most local authorities (or municipali- DCSF, or any national agency, to manage. ties or school districts) have initially been Instead the DCSF should look to approve hostile towards ISFS reforms. a range of ‘authorisers’ such as Local Authorities, elected mayors, universities 8. Accountability is difficult to man- and educational charities. age at a national level: The problem of entirely ignoring local government Stage 3) Introduce a national funding is that it is very difficult to author- formula. A clear and transparent national ise and oversee schools from central funding formula should be introduced government. as recommended in our report School Funding and Social Justice published last 9. Funding needs to be fair and year. All schools would receive per-pupil consistent funding direct from the government. 10. Choice does not necessarily lead Stage 4) Allow the network of authoris- to segregation but admissions policies ers to start commissioning new schools. have to be set carefully: In particu- Authorisers would be able to approve an lar, policies must remove any ‘early bird’ unlimited number of schools from provid- advantage which would favour the better- ers whose educational model had already informed middle classes and should, ide- proved successful. For entirely new pro- ally, incentivise providers to start schools viders an annual cap would be in place to in deprived communities. regulate supply. www.policyexchange.org.uk • 5 A guide to school choice reforms Introduction Arguments over school choice are likely no incentive to improve. Likewise a com- to feature strongly at the next General pletely free market would undoubtedly Election.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paying for the Party
    PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 1 Paying for the Party Myths and realities in British political finance Michael Pinto-Duschinsky edited by Roger Gough Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with aca- demics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy out- comes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Tru, stees Charles Moore (Chairman of the Board), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Robin Edwards, Richard Ehrman, Virginia Fraser, Lizzie Noel, George Robinson, Andrew Sells, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson, Rachel Whetstone PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 2 About the author Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky is senior Nations, the European Union, Council of research fellow at Brunel University and a Europe, Commonwealth Secretariat, the recognised worldwide authority on politi- British Foreign and Commonwealth cal finance. A former fellow of Merton Office and the Home Office. He was a College, Oxford, and Pembroke College, founder governor of the Westminster Oxford, he is president of the International Foundation for Democracy. In 2006-07 he Political Science Association’s research was the lead witness before the Committee committee on political finance and politi- on Standards in Public Life in its review of cal corruption and a board member of the the Electoral Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • School Choice
    Updated 3/17/2018 by C.Noggle LWV-VA Standards and Approval Criteria for (non-Public) School Choice Options School Choice Options in Virginia: Charter, Vouchers, Tuition Tax Credits, Virtual [Funding and Operation Parameters for K-12 Options] [Also See Appendix D.] Yes No Comment/Explain/Concern 1 Is this Position Updating the LWV-VA Position on K-12 update needed? Education is needed, and needed promptly. Changes and additions are proposed to expand the Education Position to address Charter Schools, funding of private schools with tuition tax credits, funding of private schools and students with vouchers, and the recent establishment of online learning programs. 2 Should these 5 Principles be adopted? Principle #1 Public schools should prevail as the highest priority for school choice in Virginia. Principle #2 Public schools sustain democracy by being open to all children. Principle #3: Public schools serve the public and prepare citizens to maintain our government. Principle #4: A Public school system allows the public to vote on school governance and school policy. Principle #5: Public schools allow the exchange of ideas and participation in decision-making. Ergo, Public money should go to Public Schools, not to Private Schools I. Charter and Virtual Please see the complete Matrix for discussion of Schools. NOTE: All Charter Schools. Virginia Charter Schools ARE Public Schools. 3 II. All School Choice Should these parameters, standards and policies Option Requirements be adopted? Page 1 of 6 3/17/2018 A. Fair and legal funding [No Public funds shall go to sectarian schools.] 1. Require Separation of church and state (See U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix Ecosystem Phone: (408) 540-3700
    Netflix 100 Winchester Circle Los Gatos, CA 95032 Netflix Ecosystem Phone: (408) 540-3700 www.netflix.com Outside Relationships (a California Corporation) Outside Relationships Netflix Securities Regulation Regulators Capital Suppliers Customers and Stock Exchange Customers Suppliers Capital Regulators Debt Structure Equity Structure Listing Rules Public Debt Bond Financing Holders Debt ( $16.31 Billion as of December 31, 2020) | Credit Ratings: S&P (BB+), Moody’s (Ba3) Equity Securities Common Stock Regulators $750 Million Revolving Credit Facility (Matures 2024) 2021 Senior Notes ($500 Million) 2025 Senior Notes ($800 Million) 2027 Senior Notes ($1.588 Billion) Common Stock Repurchase Plan Preferred Stock Common Stock Repurchases Significant Authorized: $5 Billion Authorized: 10,000,000 Authorized: 4,990,000,000 Shareholders Deposit Accounts with Black-Owned Financial Institutions 2022 Senior Notes ($700 Million) 2025 Senior Notes ($500 Million) 2028 Senior Notes ($1.600 Billion) US Securities Balance Available: $5 Billion Issued: None Issued: 442,895,261 Revolving Credit Financing Equity Capital and Exchange Commercial Black Economic Development Initiative Hope Credit Union 2024 Senior Notes ($400 Million) 2026 Senior Notes ($1.00 Billion) 2028 Senior Notes ($1.900 Billion) Expiration: None Record Holders: None Record Holders: 1,977 The Vanguard Commission Banks (Lead Group, Inc. Subjects of Bank: Goldman Communication (7.06%) General Sachs, JPMorgan Equipment and Corporate Functions Product Content Professional The NASDAQ Business
    [Show full text]
  • SCHOOL CHOICE in FINLAND Part of a Research Project 'School Choice in Finland' Led by Hannu Vartiainen, Financed by Academy of Finland
    Mikko Salonen HECER, University of Helsinki [email protected] SCHOOL CHOICE IN FINLAND Part of a research project 'School choice in Finland' led by Hannu Vartiainen, financed by Academy of Finland INTRODUCTION Right now there are large scale reforms that Education in Finland * are going to take place on fall 2013 for the In Finland every year approximately 60 000 Academic Vocational Typical ages secondary schools and fall 2014 for the degrees degrees students take part in a national system universities. Previously the school selection doctor where new students are allocated to mechanism for the univerisities was not master polytechnic + 2-3 secondary schools. The allocation is done centralized. Our goal is to study how the bachelor polytechnic + 3-4 based on student preferences and criteria of current system works (for secondary upper 18-19 each school. The students can apply to no secondary vocational schools, universities and polytechnics) and school 17-18 more than five different schools. Yearly school (voluntary) estimate its welfare losses compared to an (voluntary) 16-17 approximately 4 000 to 5 000 students are alternative mechanism. After the school 15-16 not admitted to any school. Of those reform we plan to estimate it's welfare 14-15 students who are admitted to a vocational effects as well. 13-14 upper secondary school 25% drop out 12-13 during the first year. Student drop out rate We have data on admittance to comprehensive school polytechnic universities for the newly (compulsory) 11-12 for general upper secondary school is 10 %. 10-11 These young people who have dropped out graduated secondary school applicants and on secondary school selection.
    [Show full text]
  • How the School-Choice Paradigm Subverts Equal Education for Students with Disabilities Amanda S
    Maryland Law Review Volume 78 | Issue 3 Article 3 Limited Choices: How the School-Choice Paradigm Subverts Equal Education for Students with Disabilities Amanda S. Sen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the Disability Law Commons, Education Law Commons, and the Fourteenth Amendment Commons Recommended Citation 78 Md. L. Rev. 470 (2019) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIMITED CHOICES: HOW THE SCHOOL-CHOICE PARADIGM SUBVERTS EQUAL EDUCATION FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AMANDA S. SEN∗ ABSTRACT While there is no absolute right to education in the Constitution of the United States, legislation and litigation have created and elucidated specific rights of children to, at a minimum, equal op- portunity in education. For students with disabilities, the right to equality in educational opportunity can be found in both federal statutes and under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Rapidly developing education policy currently promotes increas- ing options for parents to use federal and state funds to send their children to schools other than their neighborhood public schools (“school choice”). However, the specific rights of students with disabilities have been largely overlooked. This Article will explain the ways in which school-choice laws and the rights of students with disabilities overlap and interact, expose gaps that leave stu- dents with disabilities vulnerable, and suggest actions that legisla- tors and litigators can take to mitigate that vulnerability and en- sure equal opportunity in education.
    [Show full text]
  • School Parents Are More Likely Than Charter and Private School Parents to Be Satisfied with the Communication Around Reopening from Schools
    EdChoice GEN POP NATIONAL POLLING PRESENTATION September 2020 EDCHOICE SEPTEMBER Most parents are at least somewhat comfortable sending their children to school, but POLLING PRESENTATION they still prefer virtual learning. Parents generally feel prepared to facilitate virtual learning, especially parents of younger students. Public school parents are more likely than charter and private school parents to be satisfied with the communication around reopening from schools. A slight majority of parents have either joined a learning pod or are looking to form one. Those with younger children, higher incomes, and living in urban areas are more likely to be participating in one. Those that are interested or participating in pods think they will help students stay up to speed and provide a safe environment for socialization. While, those against learning pods think they are unsafe, unnecessary, or too expensive. Over half of school parents are at least somewhat likely to seek out tutoring for their child/children outside of school hours this year. Parents that are very likely to seek out tutoring for their child/children have younger children, higher incomes and are living in urban Key Points areas. 4 School parents' favorability of homeschooling has remained high since the coronavirus outbreak began in March. While many students switched from home school to other school types for this upcoming school year, homeschooling still saw an increase in enrollment. Americans school type preferences have shifted since the outbreak to be more in favor of homeschooling when given the option, especially if cost and transportation are not factors. 5 Americans remain more likely to support school choice policies, including charter schools, once given information, especially non-parents and independents.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHOOL CHOICE State Summary Indiana
    SCHOOL CHOICE State Summary Indiana OVERVIEW Charters: Indiana is one of 43 states, including the District of Columbia, that permit charter schools. Indiana’s charter law was enacted in 2001. INdIANA’S ChARTeRS There are currently 75 charters in the state, enrolling an estimated 34,347 students . Year of Charter Law – 2001 NAPCS Ranking of Charter Law – 2 of 43 Indiana does not place caps on charter school growth, but there are Total Charters – 75 restrictions on virtual charter school enrollment. State law permits new charter start-ups, traditional public to charter conversions, and virtual charter schools . The National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS) ranks Indiana’s charter law as among the strongest nationwide (2 nd out of 43 states). Vouchers or Other State Assistance for Private School Choice: Indiana offers three private school choice programs: • The Private School/Homeschool Deduction offers a tax deduction worth up to $1,000 to parents with a child enrolled in a private school or who is homeschooled. The deduction may cover approved educational expenses. • The Choice Scholarship Program offers a voucher to middle- and low-income families to attend a nonpublic school of their choice. • The School Scholarship Tax Credit program allows individuals and corporations to claim a 50 percent tax credit for contributions to approved scholarship granting organizations. Students are eligible to receive scholarships if their family income is within 200 percent of the free or reduced-price lunch threshold. State Laws on Other Forms of School Choice: Indiana is home to a voluntary open enrollment program through which students may request transfers to other schools or districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartnett Dissertation
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Recorded Objects: Time-Based Technologically Reproducible Art, 1954-1964 A Dissertation Presented by Gerald Hartnett to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Art History and Criticism Stony Brook University August 2017 Stony Brook University 2017 Copyright by Gerald Hartnett 2017 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Gerald Hartnett We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Andrew V. Uroskie – Dissertation Advisor Associate Professor, Department of Art Jacob Gaboury – Chairperson of Defense Assistant Professor, Department of Art Brooke Belisle – Third Reader Assistant Professor, Department of Art Noam M. Elcott, Outside Reader Associate Professor, Department of Art History, Columbia University This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation Recorded Objects: Time-Based, Technologically Reproducible Art, 1954-1964 by Gerald Hartnett Doctor of Philosophy in Art History and Criticism Stony Brook University 2017 Illuminating experimental, time-based, and technologically reproducible art objects produced between 1954 and 1964 to represent “the real,” this dissertation considers theories of mediation, ascertains vectors of influence between art and the cybernetic and computational sciences, and argues that the key practitioners responded to technological reproducibility in three ways. First of all, writers Guy Debord and William Burroughs reinvented appropriation art practice as a means of critiquing retrograde mass media entertainments and reportage.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIVATE SCHOOL CHOICE Myths V. Reality
    PRIVATE SCHOOL CHOICE Myths v. Reality There are many myths and misconceptions about private school choice programs. Despite the rhetoric, parents continue to demand school options and choose these programs to provide high- quality educational opportunities for their children. Today, almost half a million students are enrolled in voucher, tax credit scholarship, and education savings account (ESA) programs nationwide. Below we address some common “myths” about these school choice programs. MYTH #1: Private school choice programs drain money from public schools. REALITY: Private school choice programs save our government millions of dollars each year. When a student attends a non-public school using a voucher, ESA, or tax credit scholarship, state and federal governments usually do not have to pay a public school to provide an education for that student. And the cost to educate a child in a traditional district school is almost always greater than the public funding provided for each child in a school choice program. So it’s no wonder that tax credit scholarship programs, for example, end up saving each participating state anywhere from $13-$120 million annually.i MYTH #2: Private school choice programs violate the separation between church and state. REALITY: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that appropriately-designed private school choice programs are fully constitutional.ii And numerous state courts have upheld the constitutionality of voucher, tax credit scholarship, and ESA programs.iii MYTH #3: Students don’t benefit from private school choice. REALITY: Seventeen empirical studies examined academic outcomes for private school choice participants using random assignment, the “gold standard” of social science.
    [Show full text]
  • School Choice and State Constitutions School Choice and State Constitutions
    School Choice and State Constitutions School Choice and State Constitutions April 2007 A joint publication of The Institute for Justice and The American Legislative Exchange Council Institute for ustice J 901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900 1129 20th Street NW, Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22203 Washington, DC 20036 (703) 682-9320 (202) 466-3800 www.IJ.org www.alec.org reference guide School Choice and State Constitutions A Guide to Designing School Choice Programs A joint publication of The Institute for Justice and American Legislative Exchange Council April 2007 table of contents Foreword 1 Introduction 2 How to Use This Report 7 State Summaries Alabama 10 Alaska 11 Arizona 12 Arkansas 14 California 15 Colorado 17 Connecticut 19 Delaware 21 Florida 22 Georgia 24 Hawaii 26 Idaho 27 Illinois 29 Indiana 31 Iowa 33 Kansas 34 Kentucky 35 Louisiana 38 table of contents Maine 39 Maryland 41 Massachusetts 42 Michigan 44 Minnesota 46 Mississippi 48 Missouri 49 Montana 52 Nebraska 53 Nevada 55 New Hampshire 56 New Jersey 57 New Mexico 58 New York 60 North Carolina 62 North Dakota 64 Ohio 65 Oklahoma 67 Oregon 69 Pennsylvania 70 Rhode Island 72 South Carolina 73 South Dakota 75 Tennessee 77 Texas 78 Utah 79 Vermont 81 Virginia 82 Washington 84 West Virginia 87 Wisconsin 88 Wyoming 91 Model Legislation 93 Glossary 95 Additional Resources 97 About the Author 99 Acknowledgments 100 About IJ 101 About ALEC 102 foreword Whenever school choice legislation is considered, the stakes are enormous. Children, parents, teachers and taxpayers all stand to benefit dramatically from well-designed programs.
    [Show full text]
  • School Choice in Finnish Comprehensive Schooling – a Case Study of Educational Strategies in the School
    School Choice in Finnish Comprehensive Schooling – A Case Study of Educational Strategies in the School Political “Playground” of Vantaa Ulla Gratt In meiner Masterarbeit (2010) untersuchte Finland – “wonderland” of education? ich die Schulwahlstrategien von Eltern in der Stadt Vantaa, Finnland. Im Jahr 1998 wurde Everybody, who has something to do with edu- die Schulwahl zu einem wichtigen bildungspo- cation, has probably heard of the “wonderland” litischen Thema in Finnland. Neue Regelungen of education – Finland. The otherwise not that ermöglichten den Gemeinden, eigenständig über well-known northern country situated between die Organisation der Pflichtschulen zu entschei- Sweden and Russia must have made something den. In Vantaa zielt die lokale Schulpolitik auf right in the 1970s. According to Pekkarinen, Gleichheit und die Verringerung von Unter- Kerr and Uusitalo (2009) the founding of the schieden ab. Vor dem Hintergrund der unter- nine-year-long compulsory comprehensive schiedlichen Ansätze kommt dem Verhalten der school “for all” did indeed improve the social Eltern bei der Schulwahl besondere Bedeutung justice in education. More and more individuals zu. Besonders das Verhältnis zwischen lokaler could reach a higher educational level than the Schulpolitik, den Bildungsstrategien der Eltern earlier generation had reached. As well accor- und der Schulwahl der Eltern ist von Interesse. ding to PISA, everything seems to be just perfect Im Rahmen dieses Artikels wird vor allem das in Finnish educational system. Thema der sozialen Gerechtigkeit in finnischen Gesamtschulen beschrieben. In this article I will present some insights into social justice in Finnish comprehensive schoo- In my master’s thesis (2010) I studied the ling. I might disappoint you a little.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Special Education in School Choice
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Economics of School Choice Volume Author/Editor: Caroline M. Hoxby, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-35533-0 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/hox03-1 Conference Date: February 22-24, 2001 Publication Date: January 2003 Title: The Role of Special Education in School Choice Author: Julie Berry Cullen, Steven G. Rivkin URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10086 3 The Role of Special Education in School Choice Julie Berry Cullen and Steven G. Rivkin 3.1 Introduction There are differing views of the impact of school choice programs on the distribution of student opportunity. Proponents claim that all students, both those who take advantage of choice and those who remain in their neighborhood schools, will benefit as schools improve in response to com- petitive pressures. Others fear that only the more advantaged and informed students will opt out to better schools, leaving the more disadvantaged stu- dents isolated in the worst schools with declining resources. Among the students who may be left behind are special needs students. Students with disabilities are more costly to educate and may therefore en- counter explicit or implicit barriers to attending choice schools. Also, high concentrations of special needs students may be a deterrent to other stu- dents deciding on schooling options. These considerations may lead some schools to adopt policies that discourage students with special needs from attending, thereby limiting the choices available to these students. Such concerns about the relative access and participation of students with dis- abilities overlap with concerns about low-income and minority students, al- though the degree of legal protection differs.
    [Show full text]