BUNHILL and CLERKENWELL Area Action Plan Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BUNHILL and CLERKENWELL Area Action Plan Consultation Planning for the future of BUNHILL AND CLERKENWELL Area Action Plan consultation Issues and Options Paper DRAFT for the Executive, April 2009 FOREWORD Islington Council, in partnership with EC1 New Deal for Communities, is producing an “Area Action Plan” for Bunhill and Clerkenwell. This consultation document sets out the challenges that the area will face over the coming years, and provides some suggestions and ideas about how these could be addressed. We want to hear what you think about these. The south of Islington is a unique part of London. Between 1900 and 1965 the area fell within the Metropolitan Borough of Finsbury: a name that prevails in the local government-led projects of that era, such as the health and leisure centres. Prior to the creation of Finsbury Borough, the area was two separate parishes: St. Luke’s and Clerkenwell. The distinct identities of these areas remain to this day; however, both areas are recognisably part of central London. Over the last 15 years, parts of the area have been an urban success story. Clerkenwell, in particular, has retained its historic character whilst accommodating more residents and providing jobs in creative industries. EC1 New Deal for Communities, which has operated in the area since 2001, has had a positive impact on the lives of many residents and businesses. However, despite lying less than a mile from London’s financial heart, parts of the area remain among London’s most deprived. Despite the recent economic downturn, the Bunhill and Clerkenwell area is about to enter a period of major change. By 2017, Farringdon station will be the only place within London served by both the Crossrail and Thameslink networks, bringing the area within reach of thousands of commuters. This will drive substantial local residential and employment growth, with an estimated 3,400 new homes and 18,000 jobs needed by 2025. All of this change raises questions about how the area should develop: • Where and how should new residents and jobs be accommodated? • How can inward investment benefit all of the area’s residents, reduce deprivation and improve quality of life? • What improvements might be needed to support the additional people? • How can development reinforce, rather than erode, the area’s character? This document identifies issues and opportunities facing the area, and sets out various options for addressing them. Your feedback will help us to produce an “Area Action Plan” for Bunhill and Clerkenwell, which will encourage the right sort of development in the right places, and will identify what the council will do to improve local facilities. The Area Action Plan will complement existing neighbourhood plans, and enable them to be achieved. The Area Action Plan has the potential to create a great future for Bunhill and Clerkenwell, cementing their roles as vibrant parts of central London, while retaining their unique character and sense of community. We need your help to make sure that we get it right. 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The Bunhill and Clerkenwell area has changed significantly over the last few years, particularly in terms of housing development. Despite the current recession, development pressures are likely to continue into the future. It is the council’s role to manage this change so that people and businesses in the area benefit from future investment. 1.2. While there are choices to make in how change is managed, they have to be made within the existing national, regional and local policy context. This is outlined below. • The government produces “planning policy statements” for the whole of England. The government favours new development in urban locations, on previously developed land, and in areas accessible by public transport. Bunhill and Clerkenwell meet all of these government requirements. • The Mayor of London’s “London Plan” has a significant influence on the capital’s future development. The London Plan argues for stimulating developing within London’s “Central Activities Zone”, which covers all of the area covered by this Area Action Plan, plus some neighbouring areas. The London Plan specifically identifies the Farringdon and “City Fringe” areas as their priority locations for population and jobs expansion within the Central Activities Zone (see map below). Figure 1: Islington’s part of London’s “Central Activities Zone” 2 • The council’s emerging “Core Strategy” will identify where new development and infrastructure will be accommodated in Islington over the next 15 years. To achieve this it will include a range of policies, which will have a major impact on Bunhill and Clerkenwell as well as other locations within the borough. • EC1 New Deal for Communities, which has operated in the area since 2001, continues to undertake a number of projects and programmes within Bunhill and Clerkenwell. These include providing new community and leisure facilities, and regenerating streets and parks. • The council’s Unitary Development Plan (2002) is currently used to make planning decisions in the area. The Unitary Development Plan will eventually be replaced by the Core Strategy and other new planning policy documents. • Design for London, Transport for London, Crossrail, the Greater London Authority, the London Borough of Camden, and the City of London are collaborating with the London Borough of Islington on a masterplan for the area around Farringdon station, which will inform the Area Action Plan. Planning for residential and employment growth 1.3. The population of Bunhill and Clerkenwell is likely to increase substantially over the next few years. In addition to residents, the area will need to accommodate a considerable number of new jobs and services. Although the current downturn may result in less development in the short term, economic growth is likely to return during the latter half of the plan period, along with associated pressures for development. 1.4. Since 2001, the number of residents within the area has grown by well over 25%, to around 23,000 people. The Greater London Authority estimates that this growth will continue, with the population of Bunhill ward increasing by 4,375 residents, and Clerkenwell ward by 2,415 residents, between 2008 and 2020. This growth stems both from natural increases in the local population as well as new residents moving into the area. 1.5. Currently, the Area Action Plan area accounts for 80% of the total population of Bunhill and Clerkenwell wards. If population growth is sustained as forecast, this means that the area will need to 3 accommodate at least 6,800 additional residents by 2026 – equivalent to around 3,400 new homes 1. 1.6. Islington’s part of the Central Activities Zone contains well over half of the borough’s jobs. A recent study commissioned by the council estimates that by 2026 there will be an additional 22,500 employees within Islington’s part of the Central Activities Zone, representing around 75% of the borough’s total employment growth. 1.7. Currently, the Area Action Plan area accounts for around 80% of employment floorspace within Islington’s part of the Central Activities Zone , and has an estimated 85,000 employees. The majority of these jobs are occupied by people who live outside the area. To retain its share of employment the area may need to accommodate an additional 18,000 2 employees by 2026. 1.8. These figures assume that 60% of new jobs will be office-based, with the rest provided in other service industries (e.g. hospitality and catering). Given the changing economic climate, and in particular the uncertainty about the commercial office sector, these figures may need to be substantially revised. 1.9. To support the additional residents and employees, there will also need to be a corresponding expansion in floorspace for shops, leisure, community facilities and parks. Figure 2: City Road Basin is a major new development for the area An “Area Action Plan” for Bunhill and Clerkenwell 1.10. Because of the scale of change likely to occur in the area, Islington Council is preparing an Area Action Plan (AAP) to guide its future 1These housing figures are based on GLA population growth forecasts. However, a Housing Capacity Study currently being completed will identify potential housing sites. This will produce more robust estimates for future housing growth in the area. 2 Based on 2008 GLA employment projections. 4 development. AAPs focus on the implementation of policy in a specific area. They are an important way of ensuring development of an appropriate scale, mix and quality for areas of change or opportunity. 1.11. Once adopted, the Area Action Plan will help us to manage change in the area by: • set out the council’s vision for how the area should develop • influence and guide land uses and building design in the area • identify site-specific and area-based proposals to stimulate regeneration in areas where it is most needed • set out the public sector’s spending priorities in the area 1.12. It is expected that fundamental economic and environmental improvements will result from commercial-led development along the southern and northern boundaries of the area (i.e. around Farringdon station and along the City Road axis). A key principle of the Area Action Plan will be to see these improvements extended to the rest of the area and all of its residents. The “Issues and Options Paper” 1.13. An issues and options paper is the first step along the way towards adopting an Area Action Plan. It is a document that is used to generate and gather views for what should be in the AAP. 1.14. The council has undertaken some background work 3 and has started collaborating with key delivery partners on options for the development of the area.
Recommended publications
  • Cemetery Records
    RESEARCH GUIDE Cemetery Records Research Guide 5: Cemetery Records CONTENTS Introduction Main cemetery records held at LMA Bunhill Fields (CLC/271) New Bunhill Fields, Islington (B/NBF) The City of London Cemetery, Little Ilford (CLA/052) The City of London and Tower Hamlets Cemetery (CTHC) Other cemetery records at LMA Indexes and Transcripts in the LMA Library Records held elsewhere Introduction Before the mid-19th century most burials in London took place in churchyards and from the mid-16th century were recorded in parish registers. Some hospitals and other institutions had their own burial grounds. From the time of the Black Death special burial grounds outside the City walls were provided for people who died from the periodic epidemics of plague which afflicted London. Land to the north of the Artillery Ground known as Bunhill Fields was set aside in 1665 as a plague burial ground, but was not used for this purpose. It then became a burial ground for nonconformists. After 1690 many nonconformist meeting houses and chapels were established in London some of which had their own burial grounds. By the late 18th century the London churchyards were becoming overcrowded. New cemeteries were established as private speculations generally offering slightly lower charges for burials than the churchyards. Some of these burial grounds were originally connected to chapels adjoining them, but were subsequently bought by private individuals. By 1835 there were at least fourteen such burial grounds in London including Spa Fields, Clerkenwell, opposite London Metropolitan Archives (LMA) where about 80, 000 people were buried. An enquiry in 1843 discovered that about 40 burials were taking place each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Historic Graveyard and Cemetery Monuments
    Caring for Historic Graveyard and Cemetery Monuments Guidance and best practice for the assessment, planning and implementation of conservation work to monuments as well as legal frameworks and statutory duties. www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/ caring-historic-graveyard-cemetery-monuments Contents Summary 3 1 Approach 4 2 Historical background 5 Churchyards 5 Burial grounds 6 Cemeteries 6 War cemeteries and war graves 6 3 Monuments 8 Types of monuments 8 Materials 10 4 Deterioration 14 Material properties and decay characteristics 14 Structure 16 Inappropriate treatments 16 5 Legislation 19 Health and safety 19 Statutory designations 19 6 Management 20 Prioritisation of work 20 7 Inspection and assessment 21 Inspection survey process 21 Documentation 21 Condition survey and risk assessment 25 8 Practical treatment 27 Establishing priorities 27 Commissioning conservation work 27 Routine care and maintenance 27 Practical intervention 28 9 Further information 39 Funding 39 Principal sources of advice 39 Other sources of advice 41 Bibliography 41 2 Summary Monuments mark the final resting place of people DEFINITIONS whatever their origins and status.The materials, design, Monuments: throughout this document, the word craftsmanship and inscriptions of these monuments are ‘monuments’ has been used to include outdoor a rich and irreplaceable repository of information that monuments, memorials, sculptures and other symbols of connects us with previous generations and their history. commemoration They continue to be objects of respect but unfortunately, many monuments are also neglected. Churchyards: a burial ground around a church or other place of worship Many burial sites are still in use and provide us with Burial grounds: a pre-Victorian place of burial without a landscapes of cultural, historical and natural interest.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Islington Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal
    London Borough of Islington Archaeological Priority Areas Appraisal July 2018 DOCUMENT CONTROL Author(s): Alison Bennett, Teresa O’Connor, Katie Lee-Smith Derivation: Origination Date: 2/8/18 Reviser(s): Alison Bennett Date of last revision: 31/8/18 Date Printed: Version: 2 Status: Summary of Changes: Circulation: Required Action: File Name/Location: Approval: (Signature) 2 Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 2 Explanation of Archaeological Priority Areas .................................................................. 5 3 Archaeological Priority Area Tiers .................................................................................. 7 4 The London Borough of Islington: Historical and Archaeological Interest ....................... 9 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 9 4.2 Prehistoric (500,000 BC to 42 AD) .......................................................................... 9 4.3 Roman (43 AD to 409 AD) .................................................................................... 10 4.4 Anglo-Saxon (410 AD to 1065 AD) ....................................................................... 10 4.5 Medieval (1066 AD to 1549 AD) ............................................................................ 11 4.6 Post medieval (1540 AD to 1900 AD).................................................................... 12 4.7 Modern
    [Show full text]
  • JEWISH CIVILIAN DEATHS DURING WORLD WAR II Excluding Those Deaths Registered in the Metropolitan Borough of Stepney
    JEWISH CIVILIAN DEATHS DURING WORLD WAR II excluding those deaths registered in the Metropolitan Borough of Stepney Compiled by Harold Pollins This list may not be used elsewhere without consent. ©Harold Pollins For a full description of the contents of this list please see the description on the list of datasets Harold Pollins acknowledges the tremendous assistance of Harvey Kaplan who collated the Glasgow deaths Date of Additional Information Surname Given Name Place of Residence Place of Death Age Spouse Name Father's Name Mother's Name Death Comments and Notes 34 Twyford Avenue, AARONBERG Esther Acton 18‐Oct‐40 40 Ralph 34 Twyford Avenue, AARONBERG Ralph Acton 18‐Oct‐40 35 Esther 39 Maitland House, Bishop's Way, Bethnal Bethnal Green Tube AARONS Betty Diane Green Shelter 03‐Mar‐43 14 Arnold In shelter accident BROOKSTONE Israel 41 Teesdale Street Tube shelter 03‐Mar‐43 66 Sarah In shelter accident in shelter accident. Light Rescue Service. Son of Mr and Mrs B Lazarus of 157 Bethnal LAZARUS Morris 205 Roman Road Tube shelter 03‐Mar‐43 43 Rosy Green Road 55 Cleveland Way, Mile MYERS Jeffrey End Tube shelter 03‐Mar‐43 6 Isaac Sophie in shelter accident 55 Cleveland Way, Mile MYERS Sophie End Tube shelter 03‐Mar‐43 40 Isaac Charterhouse Clinic, Thamesmouth, Westcliff‐ Weymouth St, Obituary Jewish Chronicle ABRAHAMS Alphonse Nathaniel on‐Sea Marylebone 17‐Sep‐40 65 Evelyn May 15.11.1940 page 6 98 Lewis Trust Buildings, injured 4 January 1945 at ABRAHAMS Benjamin Dalston Lane, Hackney German Hospital 08‐Jan‐45 56 Leah Forest Road Library 96 Tottenham Court Polish National.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Novembeb 20, 1900. 7331
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBEB 20, 1900. 7331 OTICE is Lereby given, that the Governor at which respective offices, as well as at the office N and Company of the New River brought of the Company, all persons wishing to inspect from Chad well and Amwell to London, commonly them may do so at any time during office hours for called the New River Company, under the powers the period of one month before they are confirmed. of the Metropolis Water Act, 1852, the "Metro- —Dated this seventeenth November, 1900. polis Water Act, 1871, and the Metropolis Water By order of the Board, Act, 1897, has (subject to necessary confirmation) . MONTAGUE WATTS, Secretary. made Regulations instead of the Regulations now Office : Southwark Bridge-road, London, S.E. in force, and that the Regulations so made have been submitted to the Local Government Board TVT OTICE is here1 y given that the East London for confirmation, and that copies have been 1, JJ Waterworks Company under the powers of deposited at the offices of the Mayor, Aldermen, the Metropolis Water Act, 1852, ihe Metropolis and Commons of the city of London, the London Wa'er Act, 1871, and the Metropolis Water, Acr, County Council, the city of Westminster, the 1897, have, subject to necessary confirmation, made metropolitan boroughs of Finsbury, Islington, Regulations instead of the Regulations now in Shoreditch, Stepney, Hackney, Stoke Newington, force, and that the Regulations so made have been St. Pancras, Hampstead, and Holborn ; the submitted to the Local Government Board for Urban District Councils of Hornc-ey, Tottenham, confirmation, and that copies have been deposited and Wood Green, and at the offices of the County at the offices of the Major, Aldermen, and Com- Councils of Middlesex and Hertfordshire; at mons of the city of London, of the London County which respective offices, as well as at the office of Council, of the metropolitan boroughs of Bethnal the.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Stamford Hill
    Buses from Stamford Hill 318 349 Ponders End Bus Garage Key North Middlesex Hospital for Southbury O Hail & Ride Ponders End High Street PONDERS END — Connections with London Underground section o Connections with London Overground Bull Lane Hertford Road R Connections with National Rail 24 hour 149 service Edmonton Green Bus Station White Hart Lane DI Connections with Docklands Light Railway Upper Edmonton Angel Corner for Silver Street Tottenham Cemetery B Connections with river boats White Hart Lane The Roundway Route 318 operates as Hail & Ride on the sections of roads marked Wood Green 476 Northumberland Park 24 hour H&R1 H&R2 67 243 service and on the map. Buses stop at any safe point along the WOOD GREEN Lansdowne Road Lordship Lane Lordship Lane High Road Shelbourne Road road. There are no bus stops at these locations, but please indicate Wood Green Shopping City The Roundway (East Arm) Lordship Lane clearly to the driver when you wish to board or alight. Bruce Grove Dowsett Road Windsor Road Turnpike Lane Elmhurst Road Hail & Ride section West Green Road Stanley Road Bruce Grove Monument Way High Road Tottenham Police Station West Green Road West Green Primary School Park View Road 24 hour 76 service West Green Road Black Boy Lane Tottenham Town Hall Monument Way Tottenham Hale Tottenham High Road Black Boy Lane Abbotsford Avenue High Road College of North East London St Ann’s Road TOTTENHAM Black Boy Lane Chestnuts Primary School St Ann’s Road Seven Sisters Road/ Seven Sisters Police Station Plevna Crescent High Road Seven Sisters
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of the Finsbury Dispensary, St. John's-Square, Clerkenwell, For
    1> L A ' OF THE FINSBURY DISPENSARY, o/t, 4-Ofyuarej FOR ADMINISTERING ADVICE & MEDICINES TO THE POOR, at the DISPENSARY, OR AT THEIR OWN HABITATIONS,' GRATIS, WITH A LIST OF THE GOVERNORS; INSTITUTED u DCC USX, PLAN OF THE FINSBURY DI; ST. JOHN’S SQUARE, CLERKENWELL. INTRODUCTION, ITS RISE AND PROGRESS . A FEW Gentlemen, bleffied with benevolent hearts, and liberal difpofitions, urged by theit feelings, and encouraged by the fuccefs of fimi- !ar Charities (eftabliffied in the Metropolis and places adjacent) were induced to attempt tQ in- dilute this Charity. The original Promoters met on the 29th day of April, 1780, and were foon joinedby feveral friends and humane perfons, who continued to meet very frequently, as well to promote Sub- fcriptions as to deft proper Officers, and to form and adopt Regulations, Rules and Orders, for the good government of the Charity. On the 3d of Auguft, 1780, the Governors conceived that the fruits of their labours were fo far ripened, that they ought to diffufe them among the obje&s of their Care. They there-* fore refolved that this Difpenfary fliould he opened On the then 12th inftant. In the firft fix months, 685 poor, afflicled.. worthy objects were cured or received rclieL PRESENT STATE. From-the inllitution to this time, 54,563 dif- trelfed fellow-creatures have enjoyed the ad- vantages refulting from this benevolent efla- blilhment, 52,769 of whom, to their great corn- fort, and to the happiuefs of their families, and benefit of the publick, have experienced the eminent abilities, unremitting afiiduity, and ten- der care, of the Gentlemen of the Faculty en- gaged in this Charity; either by receiving a perfect cure, or the utmoft relief that medicine or chirurgical operations could bellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Maps and Plans of Islington (1553-1894)
    Mapping Islington Historic maps and plans of Islington (1553-1894) Mapping Islington showcases a selection of maps and plans relating to the three former historic parishes that now form the London Borough of Islington. Maps are a window into the past. They provide historical evidence and offer a valuable insight to bygone streets, industries and landscapes. They are also an important source for local history research and help us to understand the development and changes that have shaped the Plan of parish of St Mary, character and identity of our borough. Islington and its environs. Surveyed by Edward Baker The display’s earliest map dates from mid-16th Century (c.1793) when Islington was a rural village outside of the City of London, ending with a survey published during the late-Victorian era when the area had become a densely populated and urbanised district of north London. The London Borough of Islington was formed in 1965 when the Metropolitan boroughs of Islington and Finsbury merged. In 2019 the borough covers an area of 14.86 km2 and stretches from Highgate in the north to the City of London borders in the south. Before 1900 Islington was historically administered in three distinct civil parishes: • St Mary Islington (north and central) • St James Clerkenwell (south-west) • St Luke Old Street (south-east) The Copperplate Map of London, c.1553-59 Moorfields The Copperplate Map of London is a large-scale plan Frans Franken of the city and its immediate environs. It was originally Museum of London created in 15 printed copperplate sections, of which only three are still in existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter NEWSLETTER AUGUST 2017
    Highgate Cemetery Newsletter NEWSLETTER AUGUST 2017 August 2017 1 FRIENDS OF HIGHGATE CEMETERY TRUST CONTENTS President Editor Chairman’s note .............................3 The Lord Palumbo of Walbrook Ian Dungavell Epitaphs and gravestone poetry ...4 Vice Presidents Assistant editor Tree troubles ...................................8 Derek Barratt Nick Powell The Revd John Fielding The Ecohut at Highgate Primary....9 Ian Kelly With thanks to John Murray South Park Street Cemetery, Justin Bickersteth, Frank Cano, Calcutta ........................................ 10 Adam Cooke, Gina Goldhammer, Chairman Penny Linnett, Robin Oakley, Nick ‘I told you I was ill’ ....................... 12 Adam Cooke Powell, Ellen Scrimgeour. ‘Hampstead’ in HIghgate ............ 13 Trustees The December 2017 issue will News roundup .............................. 14 Martin Adeney be posted on 10 November. Doreen Aislabie Contributions are due by 29 Historic cemeteries news............ 16 April Cameron September 2017. Charles Essex Dr Pat Hardy Registered Office Peter Knight Highgate Cemetery Lucy Lelliott Swain’s Lane, London N6 6PJ Matt Lewis Telephone 020 8340 1834 Doreen Pastor Web www.highgatecemetery.org Teresa Sladen Eve Wilder Company Number 3157806 Charity Number 1058392 Protectors Dr Tye Blackshaw Richard Morris Philip Williams Staff Dr Ian Dungavell FSA Chief Executive Frank Cano Head Gardener Justin Bickersteth Registrar Claire Freston Deputy Head Judith Etherton Archivist Gardener Elle Hazlewood Volunteering Gardeners Manager Alyson Foster Victor Herman Sexton Aneta Gomulnicka Sally Kay Bookkeeper Adam Howe Nick Powell Visitor Experience Przemyslaw Talaga Manager Dion Wallace Paul Waite Operations Manager Cover photograph Highgate Cemetery Chapel, the photograph taken probably sometime in the 1950s before the bell tower and pinnacles were taken down. Should we consider restoring these in the future? 2 Highgate Cemetery Newsletter Chairman’s note There has been more than usual change in the Board of Trustees following our Annual General Meeting in April.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and London's Victorian Cemeteries
    Geology and London’s Victorian Cemeteries Dr. David Cook Aldersbrook Geological Society 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Page 3 Part 2: Victorian Cemeteries Page 5 Part 3: The Rocks Page 7 A quick guide to the geology of the stones used in cemeteries Part 4: The Cemeteries Page 12 Abney Park Brompton City of London East Finchley Hampstead Highgate Islington and St. Pancras Kensal Green Nunhead Tower Hamlets West Norwood Part 5: Appendix – Page 29 Notes on other cemeteries (Ladywell and Brockley, Plumstead and Charlton) Further Information (websites, publications, friends groups) Postscript 2 Geology and London’s Victorian Cemeteries Part 1: Introduction London is a huge modern city - with congested roads, crowded shopping areas and bleak industrial estates. However, it is also a city well-served by open spaces. There are numerous small parks which provide relief retreat from city life, while areas such as Richmond Park and Riverside, Hyde Park, Hampstead Heath, Epping Forest and Wimbledon Common are real recreational treasures. Although not so obviously popular, many of our cemeteries and churchyards provide a much overlooked such amenity. Many of those established in Victorian times were designed to be used as places of recreation by the public as well as places of burial. Many are still in use and remain beautiful and interesting places for quiet walks. Some, on ceasing active use for burials, have been developed as wildlife sanctuaries and community parks. As is the case with parklands, there are some especially splendid cemeteries in the capital which stand out from the rest. I would personally recommend the City of London, Islington and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Take the Benefits of Plaisterer
    Peace to be held for the county of Surry, vii. Peter the late Act of Parliament made for Reliefof Infpl- Wingate, law of St Michael Que n Hith London,Wa­ ventDebtois, at the next General or Quaner Scfiioris terman and Lighterman. .John Smith, late of Free- of the Peace to be held for the County of Suny, vi*2. scl.ool-street, St. John's Uorlelie down in furry, shoe­ Daniel Morton, lateof Harlington in Middlesex, Hu*,-' maker. John Hill, Lite o St. John street inthe parish bandnian. Robert Goff, lateof Hanwellin Middlesex, of St. Mary Ie bone in Middlesex, cordwainer. Sarah Farmer. John Bullock, late of Kensington, Victualler. B.itt. late of Redmaid-lane, St. George in the East in Christopher Hopwood, late of Knaresborough in York­ Middlesex, Widow. Nicholas Myers, lace of St. Mary- shire, butcher. Humphry Holland, late of St. Bride's Magdalen Bermondfey in furry,.Gent. Savill Godfrey London, Gent. Sir Alexander Anstiuther, lateofNeu- lateot St Ann Black fiy-us, JJrewer. Esther Smith, late ivark in North Biitain. Hammond Underwood, late of of. Gray's Inn-lane in Middlesex, Widow. John Thorn­ St. John's Hackney, Grocer. Thomas Aylmg, late of ton, late o' Westerl-.ani Otherwise Westram, in Kent, St. James's Westminster, Mason. John Withers, late Surgeon. John Williams lateol Newington Green in of St. George Hanover square, brewer. Joseph Rawson, the parish of Stoke Newington in Middlesex,Victualler. late of Foidwych in Kent, Meicer. Joseph Griffin, late Richaid Pinckard, laie of St. Mary Newington Butts in of St. Giles's in the'fields, smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Newington Green (CA12) Conservation Area Statement
    Newington Green (CA12) Conservation Area Statement March 2014 Table of contents List of figures ....................................................................................................... iv Executive summary ............................................................................................. vii Part 1: Conservation Area Character Appraisal ............................................... 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 Background ....................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ......................................................................................................... 1 Location ......................................................................................................... 1 Description ..................................................................................................... 1 Planning history ............................................................................................. 3 Report structure ................................................................................................. 3 Legislation & planning policy ............................................................................. 4 Relevant legislation ........................................................................................ 4 National policy and guidance ......................................................................... 4 Local
    [Show full text]