DOCSLIB.ORG

Commission Decision (Eu) 2016/ 2069

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

30.11.2016 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 325/63 COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2016/2069 of 1 October 2014 concerning measures SA.14093 (C76/2002) implemented by Belgium in favour of Brussels South Charleroi Airport and Ryanair (notified under document C(2014) 6849) (Only the French text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof (1), Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof, Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the above Articles (2), and having regard to these comments, Whereas: 1. PROCEDURE (1) Following information published in the Belgian press in July 2001 and the receipt of a complaint in January 2002, the Commission was informed that Belgium had granted aid measures to the airline Ryanair Ltd (hereinafter ‘Ryanair’) for the operation of air services at Charleroi Airport. In letters dated 21 November 2001, 13 June 2002 and 4 July 2002, and in a meeting held on 9 October 2002, Belgium provided information on this subject to the Commission. (2) In a letter dated 11 December 2002 (3) (hereinafter ‘opening decision’), the Commission informed Belgium of its decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU (hereinafter ‘formal investigation procedure’) in respect of these measures. Belgium submitted its comments on 14 February 2003. (3) The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (4). The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question within one month of the publication date. (4) The Commission received comments from interested parties. It forwarded the comments to Belgium by letters dated 19 March and 22 April 2003. Belgium was given the opportunity to respond to them. The Commission received Belgium's observations by letters dated 16 and 27 May 2003. (5) At the request of the Commission, three meetings were held with the Belgian authorities on 24 June 2003, 23 July 2003 and 25 July 2003. These meetings were followed by the dispatch of additional information on 27 August 2003, as requested by the Commission. (6) On 19 December 2003 Belgium sent a letter containing additional information to the Commission. In this letter, the Belgian authorities requested another meeting with the Commission; this meeting was held on 16 January 2004. (1) With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (‘TEC’) have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’). The two sets of provisions are, in substance, identical. For the purposes of this Decision, references to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88, respectively, of the EC Treaty. The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as replacing ‘Community’ with ‘Union’, ‘common market’ with ‘internal market’, and ‘Court of First Instance’ with ‘General Court’. The terminology of the TFEU is used throughout this Decision. (2) OJ C 248, 17.8.2012, p. 1. (3) SG(2002) D/233141. (4) OJ C 18, 25.1.2003, p. 3. L 325/64 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2016 (7) On 12 February 2004 the Commission adopted a partly negative final decision (5) (hereinafter ‘2004 decision’). (8) This decision was annulled by judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2008 (6) (hereinafter ‘2008 judgment’), obliging the Commission to take a new final decision on the measures in question. The General Court found that the Commission's failure to examine together the measures granted to Ryanair by the Walloon Region (hereinafter ‘Region’) and by the Charleroi airport manager, the public sector company Brussels South Charleroi Airport (hereinafter ‘BSCA’), and to check whether, taken together, these two entities had acted as rational operators in a market economy, was vitiated by an error in law. The 2008 judgment had the effect of reopening the formal investigation procedure, which had been closed by the 2004 decision. (9) In a letter dated 23 July 2010, the Commission gave Belgium, and the parties having submitted comments in the formal investigation procedure initiated on 11 December 2002, the opportunity to submit further comments in the formal investigation procedure reopened following the 2008 judgment. At the request of the Commission made on 20 April 2011, the Belgian authorities sent further information in letters dated 14 July and 21 September 2011. (10) In a letter dated 21 March 2012, the Commission informed Belgium of its decision to extend the formal investi­ gation procedure to other measures (hereinafter ‘2012 extension decision’). (11) The 2012 extension decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (7). The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question. (12) Belgium submitted its comments on 22 May 2012. The comments of 22 May 2012 did not contain the summary table in Annex I to the 2012 extension decision. This was submitted on 5 June 2012. (13) On 9 August 2012 the Commission requested further information on, inter alia, the costs incurred by the Société Wallonne des Aéroports (hereinafter ‘SOWAER’) due to its investments in Charleroi airport and its work for BSCA. On 3 September 2012 the Belgian authorities submitted SOWAER's annual accounts for the years 2001 to 2004. They provided further information on 9 October and 18 October 2012. (14) On 26 October 2012, following a meeting, the Commission requested further information. Belgium provided this information on 9 November 2012. (15) The Commission received comments from the following interested parties: — comments were received from Interested Party C on 14 September 2012, — comments were received from the Board of Airline Representatives on 17 September 2012, as also comments from Air France, the Association of European Airlines and the Brussels Airport Company, — comments were received from Brussels Airlines on 18 September 2012, — comments were received from BSCA on 4 October 2012, — Ryanair submitted its comments on 3 October 2012, making reference to the comments provided on 30 September 2011, 13 April 2012 and 4 July 2012. Ryanair submitted further comments on 10 April 2013, 20 December 2013, and 17 and 31 January 2014. (16) The Commission forwarded these comments to Belgium on 2 July and 29 October 2012, 3 May 2013, 22 January and 24 February 2014. Belgium was given the opportunity to respond to them. The Commission received Belgium's observations by letters dated 17 July 2012, 14 December 2012 and 5 June 2013. (5) Commission Decision 2004/393/EC of 12 February 2004 concerning advantages granted by the Walloon Region and Brussels South Charleroi Airport to the airline Ryanair in connection with its establishment at Charleroi (OJ L 137, 30.4.2004, p. 1). (6) Judgment of 17 December 2008 in Case T-196/04 Ryanair Ltd v Commission of the European Communities [2008] ECR II-3646, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585. (7) See footnote 2. 30.11.2016 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 325/65 (17) On 14 January 2014 the Commission requested further information from Belgium, particularly with regard to applying the market economy operator test to the measures granted to BSCA. Belgium responded in letters sent on 7 and 24 February 2014. However, as these responses were incomplete, the Commission sent a reminder to Belgium on 10 March 2014, indicating the missing responses and asking Belgium to answer accordingly. Further information was submitted by Belgium on 24 March 2014. (18) On 7 February 2014 the Commission requested further information from Belgium, particularly with regard to the measures granted to Ryanair. On 18 and 24 March 2014 Belgium provided some answers to the questions asked. (19) Also on 7 February 2014, a meeting was held at Charleroi airport between representatives of the Walloon Region, SOWAER and BSCA, on the one hand, and the Commission services on the other. (20) On 25 February and 11 March 2014, the Commission asked Belgium for further information, including clarifi­ cations on the information provided by Belgium on 7 and 24 February 2014 concerning the measures granted by the Region and SOWAER to BSCA. Belgium responded in letters sent on 25 March and 4 April 2014 (annexes sent on 9 April 2014). (21) On 17 and 19 March 2014, following the adoption of the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (hereinafter ‘aviation guidelines’ (8)), the Commission called on Belgium and the interested parties to submit their comments on the application of the aviation guidelines to this case. In addition, on 15 April 2014 a notice was published inviting Member States and interested parties to submit their comments, including in this case, on the entry into force of the EU Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines. The Commission received comments from the Brussels Airport Company, Brussels Airlines, the Board of Airline Representatives, Air France, and the Association for Transport and Environment. It forwarded these comments to Belgium on 26 May 2014. The latter submitted its comments on 26 June 2014. (22) A further meeting was held on 11 April 2014 between the Commission services on the one hand and Belgium, BSCA and SOWAER on the other hand. Following this meeting, Belgium submitted documents together with a note dated 5 May 2014 on the public service tasks entrusted to BSCA. (23) On 5 May 2014 the Commission sent a further request for information to Belgium, to which the latter responded on 13 May 2014.
Recommended publications
  • Welcome Guide for International Students of the Pole Hainuyer 1 03 Word of the Editor

    Welcome Guide for International Students of the Pole Hainuyer 1 03 Word of the Editor

    WELCOME GUIDE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OF THE POLE HAINUYER 1 03 WORD OF THE EDITOR 04 BELGIUM IN A NUTSHELL 05 EDUCATION 05 Higher education in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation 06 The Pôle hainuyer, a higher education centre in Hainaut 07 Studying at an institution of the Pôle hainuyer 08 International Relations departments 10 Academic calendar French language courses CONTENT 11 11 Libraries 12 Student life 14 Culture and Sports 16 USEFUL INFORMATION 16 Administrative procedures 18 Transport 20 Accommodation 22 Health 24 Day-to-day life 25 MAPS 25 Tournai 26 Mons 27 Charleroi 28 Hainaut 30 Details 36 CONTACTS PUBLISHED BY CO-ORDINATION ILLUSTRATIONS Photographies Design Pôle Hainuyer asbl & EDITING Pierre Kroll UMONS, exnihilo.be Place du parc, 20 Lydie Lejuste © Tous droits réservés HEPH-Condorcet, 7000 Mons HELHa, ARTS2 WORD OF THE EDItoR Dear student, You have chosen to spend your mobility for studies or traineeship in the Pôle hainuyer, structure which gather higher education institutions of the Province of Hainaut in Belgium. We are very happy to welcome you here and we will do our best to ensure your mobility experience is as profitable and pleasant as possible. This guide you are holding now provides useful information and advice that will make it easier to prepare your journey and ensure your stay runs smoothly. You are now ready to discover a new living environment. Many questions probably play on your mind: who to get in touch with upon your arrival… and before your departure? How can you travel to the host city by public transport? How should you book your accommodation? What kind of insurance do you need to subscribe? We will try to answer those questions to the best of our abilities in this document.
  • The Left Wing

    The Left Wing

    Napoleon divides his forces: the left wing. The situation until about 2 p.m. By 10.30 a.m. Napoleon expected Reille, unless he would face resistance, to place his corps astride the Brussels road one or two lieues (4.5 or 9 kilometres) to the north. Though Reille’s orders where to cross the Sambre had been ambiguous (Marchienne-au-Pont and Charleroi), his target remained the same. Around the same time, having crossed the Sambre at Marchienne-au-Pont, d’Erlon was directed to take up a position on the road leading from there towards Fontaine-l’Evêque – Binche – Mons, thereby at the same time linking up with Reille in such a way to support him, if needed. There is no clear point up to where d’Erlon was to advance (as it was with Reille), but d’Erlon was also to reconnoitre in the direction of Mons and Nivelles. It is a first step in the further development of the left wing which would form part of the grand strategy of the central position. It is important to note that d’Erlon was supposed to support Reille, and not vice versa, as it was expected that he could face enemy resistance first. A possible main threat as coming from Wellington was apparently seen from the line Mons – Binche – Fontaine l’Evêque, but not such that it was expected that d’Erlon would need any support from Reille. The situation after about 2 p.m. Having been informed about a Prussian presence at Gosselies, Napoleon – at Belle Vue - drew in the front-line of his left wing more to the north-east by ordering both the 2nd and 1st corps to go there.
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey

    Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey

    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
  • Delta Air Lines Inc /De

    Delta Air Lines Inc /De

    DELTA AIR LINES INC /DE/ FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 09/28/98 for the Period Ending 06/30/98 Address HARTSFIELD ATLANTA INTL AIRPORT 1030 DELTA BLVD ATLANTA, GA 30354-1989 Telephone 4047152600 CIK 0000027904 Symbol DAL SIC Code 4512 - Air Transportation, Scheduled Industry Airline Sector Transportation Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2015, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. DELTA AIR LINES INC /DE/ FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 9/28/1998 For Period Ending 6/30/1998 Address HARTSFIELD ATLANTA INTL AIRPORT 1030 DELTA BLVD ATLANTA, Georgia 30354-1989 Telephone 404-715-2600 CIK 0000027904 Industry Airline Sector Transportation Fiscal Year 12/31 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10 -K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-5424 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) DELAWARE 58-0218548 (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.) HARTSFIELD ATLANTA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT POST OFFICE BOX 20706 30320 ATLANTA, GEORGIA (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE) REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (404) 715-2600 SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B)
  • Belgian Aerospace

    Belgian Aerospace

    BELGIAN AEROSPACE Chief editor: Fabienne L’Hoost Authors: Wouter Decoster & Laure Vander Graphic design and layout: Bold&pepper COPYRIGHT © Reproduction of the text is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Date of publication: June 2018 Printed on FSC-labelled paper This publication is also available to be consulted at the website of the Belgian Foreign Trade Agency: www.abh-ace.be BELGIAN AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PRESENTATION OF THE SECTOR 4-35 SECTION 1 : BELGIUM AND THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRY 6 SECTION 2 : THE AERONAUTICS INDUSTRY 10 SECTION 3 : THE SPACE INDUSTRY 16 SECTION 4 : BELGIAN COMPANIES AT THE FOREFRONT OF NEW AEROSPACE TRENDS 22 SECTION 5 : STAKEHOLDERS 27 CHAPTER 2 SUCCESS STORIES IN BELGIUM 36-55 ADVANCED MATERIALS & STRUCTURES ASCO INDUSTRIES 38 SABCA 40 SONACA 42 PLATFORMS & EMBEDDED SYSTEMS A.C.B. 44 NUMECA 46 THALES ALENIA SPACE 48 SERVICES & APPLICATIONS EMIXIS 50 SEPTENTRIO 52 SPACEBEL 54 CHAPTER 3 DIRECTORY OF COMPANIES 56-69 3 PRESENTATION OF THE SECTOR PRESENTATION OF THE SECTOR SECTION 1 By then, the Belgian government had already decided it would put out to tender 116 F-16 fighter jets for the Belgian army. This deal, still known today as “the contract of the BELGIUM AND THE century” not only brought money and employment to the sector, but more importantly, the latest technology and AEROSPACE INDUSTRY know-how. The number of fighter jets bought by Belgium exceeded that of any other country at that moment, except for the United States. In total, 1,811 fighters were sold in this batch. 1.1 Belgium’s long history in the aeronautics industry This was good news for the Belgian industry, since there was Belgium’s first involvement in the aeronautics sector was an agreement between General Dynamics and the European related to military contracts in the twenties.
  • Airline Alliances

    Airline Alliances

    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
  • Market Segmentation in Air Transportation in Slovak Republic

    Market Segmentation in Air Transportation in Slovak Republic

    Volume XXI, 40 – No.1, 2019, DOI: 10.35116/aa.2019.0006 MARKET SEGMENTATION IN AIR TRANSPORTATION IN SLOVAK REPUBLIC Marek PILAT*, Stanislav SZABO, Sebastian MAKO, Miroslava FERENCOVA Technical university of Kosice, Faculty of aeronautics *Corresponding author. [email protected] Abstract. This article talks about segmentation of air transport market in the Slovak Republic. The main goal was to explore all regular flights from three International airports in Slovak Republic. The researched airports include M.R. Štefánik in Bratislava, Košice International Airport and Poprad - Tatry Airport. The reason for the selection of airports was focused on scheduled flights. The main output of the work is a graphical representation of scheduled flights operated from the territory of the Slovak Republic. The work includes an overview of airlines, destinations, attractions, and other useful information that has come up with this work. Keywords: Airport; segmentation; scheduled flights 1. INTRODUCTION The main aim of this article is to point out the coverage of the air transport market from the territory of the Slovak Republic. Initial information was processed for three International airports and their regular flights to different parts of the world. We chose M.R. Stefanik in Bratislava, Kosice International Airport and Poprad - Tatry Airport. In practical part the authors collected all regular flights from the airports and processed them in table form. All these lines were needed to develop a comprehensive graphical model which is also the main output. The graphical model clearly shows where it can be reached from the territory of the Slovak Republic by a direct route. All data is current for the 2018/2019 Winter Timetable with all the current changes, whether in terms of line cancellation or adding new carriers to new destinations.

  • Download Our General Brochure

    Safety Speed Indicators Badge Readers Trainborne Recorders Tone Generators SIL2 PWM Traction/Brake Controllers SIL2 Safety Displays ERTMS iBox SIL2 Gateway http://www.logiplus.com [email protected] Aéropole de Charleroi 1, rue Clément ADER B-6041 Gosselies - Belgium Phone: 00 32 71 44 44 66 Fax: 00 32 71 43 95 74 Safety Speed Indicators A range of single- or double-needle speed indicators with galvanometers, servo-control motors or liquid crystals. These indicators are designed to make access to more secure speed information by means of sophisticated back-reading devices. These specific requirements are especially imposed for train traffic on the SNCF network, which has incidentally sanctioned several of our indicators. SIL2 Speed measurement Board When installed in a SIL2 Safety Display, this board allows to display the real speed issued from the ATESS system on the SNCF network. LogiPlus offers a range of speed indication devices for Automatic Train Cab Displays Protection. In addition to the train actual speed, various items of information are relayed to the driver, such as, for example, target-distance, target-speed, and instantaneous speed instructions. Data Entry Terminals Robust data entry terminals specifically designed for the railway onboard environment: compact design, large liquid crystal screen with shock- protection, robust backlit keys, etc. A range of electronic “Tone Generator” devices replacing with advantage the electromechanical noise-makers (bells, Tone Generators buzzers, etc) in the driver cabs; reduced dimensions, excellent reliability, faithful tone reproduction, easy programming and volume adjustment. RAILTONE NG The Railtone NG is a fully static digital sound generator for train cabs.
  • Bratislava and Košice Competition Between Regions

    Bratislava and Košice Competition Between Regions

    Herbert Kaufmann Member and Speaker of the Management Board Flughafen Wien AG Vienna International Airport A strong partner for Bratislava and Košice Competition between Regions The competitors of the Bratislava-Vienna region include Munich, Milan, Paris, Prague, etc. The Bratislava-Vienna region must define itself as a common region and develop its unique site factors. Vienna & Bratislava Airports Wide-ranging opportunities for growth 2005: 17.0 million passengers 2015: 30.0 million passengers Thereof 6 – 7 million in Bratislava For each one million passengers: 1000 new jobs at the airport Cooperation allows for the best development of potential • Vienna: primarily transfer hub west/east/long-haul • Bratislava: primarily point-to-point traffic Business, charter, low-cost carriers Competitive advantages over airports like Zurich, Munich, Prague etc. For Bratislava, more growth than with any other solution. Commitment to linking Bratislava Airport with the Vienna market • Express connections between Vienna City Centre – BTS Airport less than 1 hour travelling time • CAT operator (majority ownership Flughafen Wien AG) • Product meets highest demands by passengers e.g. city check-in with baggage Commitment to linking Bratislava Airport with the Vienna market • Construction of rail connections by 2009 (project by ÖBB and Flughafen Wien AG guaranteed by cooperation agreement) • Starting in mid-2006: Opening of city check-in in Vienna for flights from Bratislava plus bus connections Connections between Bratislava Airport and Vienna Gänsernd. Floridsdorf Marchegg Devínska Stadlau Nova Ves Bratislava Kl. St. Wien Mitte Bratislava Petržalka Flughafen Wolfsthal Wien Wien ZVBf. Wien Süd Hegyes- halom Vision for Bratislava More – Destinations – Frequencies – Passengers than with any other solution According to the Interreg III-A study by the EU, cooperation could create up to 35,000 new jobs in the region.
  • Swissair's Collapse

    Swissair's Collapse

    IWIM - Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationales Management IWIM - Institute for World Economics and International Management Swissair’s Collapse – An Economic Analysis Andreas Knorr and Andreas Arndt Materialien des Wissenschaftsschwerpunktes „Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft“ Band 28 Hrsg. von Andreas Knorr, Alfons Lemper, Axel Sell, Karl Wohlmuth Universität Bremen Swissair’s Collapse – An Economic Analysis Andreas Knorr and Andreas Arndt Andreas Knorr, Alfons Lemper, Axel Sell, Karl Wohlmuth (Hrsg.): Materialien des Wissenschaftsschwerpunktes „Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft“, Bd. 28, September 2003, ISSN 0948-3837 (ehemals: Materialien des Universitätsschwerpunktes „Internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen und Internationales Management“) Bezug: IWIM - Institut für Weltwirtschaft und Internationales Management Universität Bremen Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaft Postfach 33 04 40 D- 28334 Bremen Telefon: 04 21 / 2 18 - 34 29 Telefax: 04 21 / 2 18 - 45 50 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.iwim.uni-bremen.de Abstract Swissair’s rapid decline from one of the industries’ most renowned carriers into bank- ruptcy was the inevitable consequence of an ill-conceived alliance strategy – which also diluted Swissair’s reputation as a high-quality carrier – and the company’s inability to coordinate effectively its own operations with those of Crossair, its regional subsidiary. However, we hold that while yearlong mismanagement was indeed the driving force behind Swissair’s demise, exogenous factors both helped and compounded
  • Ramboll References Aviation

    Ramboll References Aviation

    RAMBOLL REFERENCES AVIATION ABU DHABI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Design & Build contract for 9 hardstands The Abu Dhabi International marking and signage. There will CUSTOMER Airport (ADIA) is undergoing a be staging areas for Ground Al Naboodah National Contracting major programme of expansion Support Equipment (GSE) and LOCATION under the management of Abu airside service roads connected Abu Dhabi Dhabi Airports Company (ADAC). to the main airside service road PERIOD As part of this expansion ADAC network.The stands are being 2013-2014 requires 9 Code E Hardstands to executed through a Design and SERVICES PROVIDED be constructed to provide relief Build procurement route and Pavement Design aircraft parking until opening of Ramboll has been appointed as AGL the new Midfield Terminal the Designer of Record by the Geotech Engineering Building in 2017. D&B contractor - Al Naboodah Structural Engineering National Contracting. Electrical, Drainage During peak periods, demand for Highway and Road Design aircraft parking stands is Besides providing the core Design Co-ordination frequently greater than the services of aviation layout, PROJECT BUDGET available number of stands, pavement design and 50.000.000 EUR leading to operational delays. infrastructural services, Ramboll will also adopt the Jet Fuel The 9 Code E Hardstands will be Hydrant and electrcal & telecom fitted with a storm water designs prepared by others., drainage system, apron flood lighting, AGL, VDGS, a fuel hydrant system, CCTV, Wi-Fi, IMAGE Abu Dhabi International Airport 38 AVIATION PROJECTS ABU DHABI AIRPORT EXPANSION Part of a $6.8bn expansion programme to increase capacity from 3.5 to 20 million passengers by 2011.
  • Extreme Weather

    Extreme Weather

    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com MAY 2017 NO. 953 KEEPING RUNNING IN EXTREME WEATHER Los Angeles: Measure M funding boosts LRT expansion Terror targets the St Petersburg Metro US draft budget freezes out transit 14 hurt as Hong Kong tram overturns UK tram-train Chaos theory 05> £4.40 Under scrutiny yet Making sense of the looking to 2018 Charleroi Metro 9 771460 832050 Phil Long “A great event, really well organised and the dinner, reception and exhibition space made for great networking time.” Andy Byford – CEO, Toronto Transit Commission MANCHESTER “I really enjoyed the conference and made some helpful contacts. Thanks for bringing such a professional event together.” 18-19 July 2017 Will Marshall – Siemens Mobility USA Topics and themes for 2017 include: > Rewriting the business case for light rail investment > Cyber security – Responsibilities and safeguards > Models for procurement and resourcing strategies > Safety and security: Anti-vandalism measures > Putting light rail at the heart of the community > Digitisation and real-time monitoring > Street-running safety challenges > Managing obsolescence > Next-generation driver aids > Wire-free solutions > Are we delivering the best passenger environments? > Composite and materials technologies > From smartcard to smartphone ticketing > Rail and trackform innovation > Traction energy optimisation and efficiency > Major project updates Confirmed speakers include: > Paolo Carbone – Head of Public Transport Capital Programmes, Transport Infrastructure Ireland > Geoff Inskip – Chairman, UKTram > Jane Cole – Managing Director, Blackpool Transport > Allan Alaküla – Head of Tallinn EU Office, City of Tallinn > Andres Muñoz de Dios – Director General, MetroTenerife > Tobyn Hughes – Managing Director (Transport Operations), North East Combined Authority > Alejandro Moreno – Alliance Director, Midland Metro Alliance > Ana M.