DOCSLIB.ORG

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Farm Service Agency Washington, DC 20250

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Farm Service Agency Washington, DC 20250 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farm Service Agency Washington, DC 20250 Acreage and Compliance Determinations 2-CP (Revision 15) Amendment 95 Approved by: Acting Deputy Administrator, Farm Programs Amendment Transmittal A Reasons for Amendment The following subparagraphs have been amended to update the reference from DCP to ARC/PLC: • 15 A • 16 A • 19 A and B • 23.5 E • 25 B • 102 A. Subparagraph 21 C has been added to update guidance on late-file provisions for nursery and aquaculture. Subparagraphs 22 B, C, G, and H have been amended to clarify revising acreage reports. Paragraph 23.6 has been amended to clarify procedure for reporting cover cops. Subparagraph 25 A has been amended to update the note to provide that cover crops are not eligible for double-cropping. Exhibit 10.5 has been amended to update CRM/product master and CVS modifications. Exhibit 11 has been amended to update late-filed provisions for nursery and aquaculture. 3-24-16 Page 1 Amendment Transmittal (Continued) Page Control Chart TC Text Exhibit 2-1, 2-2 10.5, pages 1-8 2-3 through 2-8 pages 8.5, 8.6 2-11, 2-12 pages 15-38 2-17 through 2-20 page 41 2-20.5, 2-20.6 11, pages 1-4 2-22.5, 2-22.6 pages 5, 6 (add) 2-22.6.5, 2-22.6.6 page 7 (add) 2-24.9, 2-24.10 2-25, 2-26 2-169 through 2-198 3-24-16 2-CP (Rev. 15) Amend. 95 Page 2 Par. 15 Part 2 Acreage Report Procedures Section 1 Responsibilities, Guidelines, and Reporting Dates 15 Using FSA-578 A Introduction County Offices shall use FSA-578 to collect data relating to crops. The data collection is to: • determine compliance with farm programs • verify compliance with HELC and WC provisions • collect data for FSA and other USDA agencies for program decisions • determine producer eligibility for loans and LDP’s *--determine crop and producer eligibility for ARC/PLC, ELAP, Livestock Forage--* Disaster Program, NAP, SURE, and TAP. B Accepting Acreage Reports The following describes the steps to take when accepting an acreage report. Step Action 1 Enter crops and acreage data on FSA-578 provided by an individual or entity identified in subparagraph 16 D. 2 Review the data with the person reporting to ensure that: • all applicable crops, types, and intended uses are included • the farm is in compliance, if applicable. 3 Perform any measurement service that was requested. 4 Provide a copy of FSA-578 and aerial or digital photocopy. 5 Perform inspections and apply tolerance rules, when applicable. 6 Send operator FSA-468 or FSA-409, as applicable. 7 Process redetermination requests. 8 COC makes determinations according to Part 3, Section 4. 9 Process payment reduction reports and notification letters, if applicable. Note: A manual FSA-578 may be accepted only when the automated FSA-578 is not available. All manual FSA-578’s must be loaded in the automated FSA-578 once the system becomes available. 3-24-16 2-CP (Rev. 15) Amend. 95 Page 2-1 Par. 16 16 Required Acreage Reports A Importance of Accurate and Timely Reporting Filing an accurate and timely acreage report for all crops and land uses, including failed *--acreage and prevented planted acreage, can prevent loss of benefits for programs listed in the following table. FSA-578 certification must be filed for the farm by the applicable final reporting date in Exhibit 6. For producers reporting NAP crops, see 1-NAP, paragraphs 375 and 376 for additional acreage reporting requirements. Acreage reports and requests for disaster credit for: • prevented planted acreage and credit must be submitted no later than 15 calendar days--* after the final planting date for the applicable crop Notes: Beginning in 2007, the final planting date for each crop is based on final planting dates established by RMA for insurable crops and NCT planting dates for noninsurable crops. If no date is established by RMA, COC may establish final planting dates for insurable and non-insurable crops in a county with approval from STC. When establishing final planting dates COC shall take into consideration the applicable dates established for surrounding counties. •*--failed acreage and credit must be sought before: • the crop acreage is destroyed • disposition of the crop. Benefit Acreage Reporting Requirement Reason for Requirement MAL’s and All cropland on the farm on which • Authorized by the Agricultural LDP’s the crop pledged as loan collateral or Act of 2014, Section 1118(c). LDP was produced. MAL’s and LDP’s are in subtitle (b).--* • Needed to determine reasonableness of claimed production. * * * * * * * * * CRP annual CRP acreage according to CRP-1 Needed to determine that the rental payment Appendix. producer has maintained CRP acreage. NAP Crop acreage for which NAP benefits Needed to established eligibility of may be requested. the crop and producer for NAP benefits. 6-17-15 2-CP (Rev. 15) Amend. 91 Page 2-2 Par. 16 16 Required Acreage Reports (Continued) B Informing Producers Producers of crops for which FSA-578 must be filed should be informed of the following: • responsibilities regarding HELC and WC provisions • availability and advantages of measurement services • loss of program benefits for noncompliance • requirements for filing an accurate crop and acreage report, including the following: *--the requirement for reporting all cropland on the farm for ARC/PLC, marketing--* assistance loans, and LDP benefits • the importance of correctly reporting crop acreage • crops that should be reported • final crop reporting dates. C Methods of Notification County Offices shall notify all producers of acreage reporting requirements by any means of communication, including the following: • news releases • newsletters • radio and television • meetings. D Who Can Certify County Offices shall accept signed and dated FSA-578 certification from 1 of the following: • farm operator • farm owner • person authorized by power of attorney • tenants and share-croppers, but only for crop acreage for which the person has a share. However, all cropland on the farm must be certified for applicable programs. Exception: For CRP, County Offices shall accept signed and dated FSA-578 from 1 of the following according to 2-CRP: • owner on CRP-1 • operator on CRP-1 • person authorized by power of attorney. 3-24-16 2-CP (Rev. 15) Amend. 95 Page 2-3 Par. 17 17 Other Acreage Reports A Accepting Other Acreage Reports Producers are not required to report crop acreages, other than those in subparagraph 16 A. However, County Offices shall accept FSA-578’s from all producers who wish to report their crop acreages for any purpose. B BWEP BWEP, which is administered by APHIS, has used cotton acreage reports that were provided by producers to local FSA offices since the first trial program in 1978. To continue providing this service, County Offices that are in States designated for participation in BWEP shall continue accepting acreage reports for BWEP purposes. * * * 5-9-05 2-CP (Rev. 15) Amend. 41 Page 2-4 (through 2-8) Par. 19 19 Assisting Persons in Reporting Acreage A Before FSA-578 Is Filed County Offices shall advise persons identified in subparagraph 16 D of the following before FSA-578 is filed: • an accurate and timely report is required *--farms participating in ARC/PLC and those requesting LDP’s and marketing assistance--* loans are required to report all cropland on the farm to be eligible for benefits • photography, official acreages, and past records are available to help in reporting acreage • measurement services are available and recommended if there is any doubt about the accuracy of any data being reported • if a discrepancy arises between previously reported crop acreage and crop acreage being reported. Note: The person reporting crop acreage shall be notified if the person’s report is in conflict with previously reported crop acreage. The person shall be advised that FSA will accept the report; however, all acreage reports are subject to spot check. Determined acreage will be compared against the most recent report given for the acreage regardless of whether previously filed reports that were later revised are more accurate. No acreage report revisions are permitted after crop acreage is spot-checked. County Offices shall not, in any way, advise any person on the quantity of acreage that should be reported. 3-24-16 2-CP (Rev. 15) Amend. 95 Page 2-11 Par. 19 19 Assisting Persons in Reporting Acreage (Continued) B Assisting Operators County Offices should take the following steps to assist a producer with filing FSA-578. Step Action 1 When possible, make an appointment to file FSA-578. 2 Require a report for all crops for which FSA-578 must be filed. Require a report *--for all cropland on each farm for which ARC/PLC, marketing assistance loans,--* and LDP benefits are being requested. Accept acreage reports for all other crops and farms. 3 Explain impact of HELC and WC provisions on farming operations. 4 • Use official acreages, where applicable. • Subtract deductions from all acreages. • Enter data on FSA-578. 5 Review each field on the farm, using photographs, photocopies, and slides or digital images, if available. 6 Use the following to determine whether certification is possible from visual inspection of official field acreages on the photograph. IF visual inspection is... THEN... possible accept FSA-578 and go to step 8. not possible go to step 7. 7 Suggest measurement service if the producer: • is uncertain about the acreage being reported • wants to guarantee that the farm acreage meets program requirements • wants to establish or correct an official acreage for an area that cannot be delineated from features that are visible on the photograph.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Wine?
    Developing a Consumer Language to Describe Local Red Wines Using Projective Mapping by Heather Jantzi Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Nutrition with Honours Acadia University March, 2017 ©Copyright by Heather Jantzi, 2017 This thesis by Heather Jantzi is accepted in its present form by the School of Nutrition and Dietetics as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honours Approved by the Thesis Supervisor __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Matt McSweeney Date Approved by the Head of the Department __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Catherine Morley Date Approved by the Honours Committee __________________________ ____________________ Dr. Jun Yang Date ii I, Heather Jantzi, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit basis. I however, retain the copyright in my thesis. _________________________________ Signature of Author _________________________________ Date iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Matthew McSweeney for supervising this research project. His ongoing support and constructive feedback took away my fears of writing a thesis, and his humour and energy made my learning experience more enjoyable than I ever anticipated. I also extend great thanks to Dr. Catherine Morley; her enthusiasm for nutrition research inspired me to pursue a topic I was passionate about and her outstanding teaching skills provided me with the foundations I needed to turn my research curiosities into reality. Thank you to my parents, Brad and Kristine Jantzi, for encouraging me to make the most out of my university experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Calder and Sound
    Gryphon Rue Rower-Upjohn Calderand Sound Herbert Matter, Alexander Calder, Tentacles (cf. Works section, fig. 50), 1947 “Noise is another whole dimension.” Alexander Calder 1 A mobile carves its habitat. Alternately seductive, stealthy, ostentatious, it dilates and retracts, eternally redefining space. A noise-mobile produces harmonic wakes – metallic collisions punctuating visual rhythms. 2 For Alexander Calder, silence is not merely the absence of sound – silence gen- erates anticipation, a bedrock feature of musical experience. The cessation of sound suggests the outline of a melody. 3 A new narrative of Calder’s relationship to sound is essential to a rigorous portrayal and a greater comprehension of his genius. In the scope of Calder’s immense œuvre (thousands of sculptures, more than 22,000 documented works in all media), I have identified nearly four dozen intentionally sound-producing mobiles. 4 Calder’s first employment of sound can be traced to the late 1920s with Cirque Calder (1926–31), an event rife with extemporised noises, bells, harmonicas and cymbals. 5 His incorporation of gongs into his sculpture followed, beginning in the early 1930s and continuing through the mid-1970s. Nowadays preservation and monetary value mandate that exhibitions of Calder’s work be in static, controlled environments. Without a histor- ical imagination, it is easy to disregard the sound component as a mere appendage to the striking visual mien of mobiles. As an additional obstacle, our contemporary consciousness is clogged with bric-a-brac associations, such as wind chimes and baby crib bibelots. As if sequestered from this trail of mainstream bastardi- sations, the element of sound in certain works remains ulterior.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Master Thesis Hungli Wang 071720.Pdf
    Choose an item. The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School CHARACTERIZATION OF MICROBIAL DYNAMICS AND VOLATILE METABOLOME CHANGES DURING FERMENTATION OF CHAMBOURCIN GRAPES IN TWO PENNSYLVANIA REGIONS A Thesis in Food Science by Hung Li Wang © 2020 Hung Li Wang Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2020 The thesis of THEHung LiPURDUE Wang was UNIVERSITY reviewed and approved GRADUATE by the following: SCHOOL Josephine Wee STATEMENT OF COMMITTEE APPROVAL Assistant Professor of Food Science Thesis Advisor Helene Hopfer Assistant Professor of Food Science Darrell W. Cockburn Assistant Professor of Food Science Robert F. Roberts Professor of Food Science Head of the Department of Food Science Approved by: Dr. ii ABSTRACT Numerous studies have indicated that the wine microbiome could generate various volatile compounds which could lead to distinguishing and different wine characteristics. However, little research regarding the wine microbiome is investigating specific microorganisms and their role within the entire microbial community under a more comprehensive sampling method. Thus, in this study we conducted direct sampling from Central and Northeast PA wineries instead of using lab-scale production to study the effect of the wine microbiome on the wine metabolome. Resulting grape and wine samples were characterized by next-generation sequencing and headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS). Collectively, the innovative sampling and experimental techniques provided a high-resolution picture of microbial dynamics and the resulting wine volatile profiles. Overall, we illustrated how microbial diversity and relative abundance of specific microorganisms change as fermentation progressed. Also, various wine volatile metabolites that are formed during the different fermentation stages were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • TGE) & the JOB Board
    1 2017 The Grape Exchange (TGE) & The JOB Board As of 7/1/17, Christy Ecktein will be handling OGEN, TGE & TJB. Please contact Christy at [email protected] This service is provided by the OSU viticulture program. The purpose of this site is to assist grape growers and wineries in selling and/or buying grapes, wine, juice or equipment and post JOBS Wanted or JOBS for Hire. The listing will be posted to the “Buckeye Appellation” website (https://ohiograpeweb.cfaes.ohio-state.edu/ ) and updates will be sent to all OGEN subscribers via email. Ads will be deleted after 4 months. If you would like items to continue or placed back on the exchange, please let me know. To post new or make changes to current ads, please send an e-mail to Christy Eckstein ([email protected]) with the contact and item description information below. Weekly updates of listings will be e-mailed to OGEN subscribers or as needed throughout the season. Suggestions to improve the Grape Exchange are also welcome. The format of the information to include is as follows: Items (grapes, wine, equipment, etc) Wanted/Needed or Selling: Name: Vineyard/Winery: Phone Number: E-mail Address: Note: Please send me a note to delete any Ads that you no longer need or want listed. There are currently four jobs listed on The JOB Board. Updates to TGE are listed as most current to oldest. *Please scroll down to Ads, pictures & contact information 2 The Grape Exchange September 21, 2017 (32) For Sale: Niagra and Concord grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, the Ohio State University
    OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 2019 Grape Maturity at OSU Research Vineyards Imed Dami, Diane Kinney, Andy Kirk, Yvonne Woodworth, The Ohio State University. Thanks to the continuous interest by Ohio growers and vintners and support by the Ohio Grape Industries Committee, we are pleased to resume monitoring fruit maturity progression of varieties grown at the research vineyards during the 2019 season. This information will be sent weekly to OGEN subscribers and posted on the program website, Buckeye Appellation. The date of berry sampling and corresponding heat units or growing degree days (GDD) are included. Note that the GDD in your location could be higher or lower than that at our sites. For example, at the Wooster research vineyard, grape ripening of similar varieties is typically 1 to 2 weeks behind central and southern Ohio, and 1 to 2 weeks ahead of more northern latitude vineyards and on Lake Erie shores. To determine the GDD in your location, visit the OSU-GDD Calculator. To learn more about monitoring fruit maturity and berry sampling, please read OSU factsheet at the following link: Are your grapes ready to pick? Click here for Fruit maturity from previous years. We wish you bountiful and successful harvest!! rape maturity of grape varieties at the Wooster research vineyard: G (1) Sampling Date: 8/20/2019 (GDD=2138) 100 Harvest Variety Berry SS (%) pH T.A. (g/L) FMI Date wt (g) Chardonnay 136 15.2 2.93 16.9 9 Chambourcin 187 14.3 2.79 18.3 8 La Crescent 138 17.9 2.89 16.0 11 Marquette 144 18.3 2.90 16.1 11 Regent 169 17.0 3.20 13.3 13 Sauvignon blanc 139 17.5 2.94 16.8 10 *SS: soluble solids, which estimate sugar concentration in grape juice using a refractometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Wines - 840 Anything Not Covered in Above Classes
    HOME WINE COMPETITION 2019 Competition Handbook Goal......................................................................................................... 2 General Information................................................................................ 2 2019 Calendar......................................................................................... 2 Wine Eligibility......................................................................................... 2 Awards.................................................................................................... 3 Current Sponsors: (Continually Updated) .............................................4 Shipping Or Hand-Delivery..................................................................... 7 Entry Rules............................................................................................ 10 Hand Delivering To Remote Location.................................................... 12 Judging Integrity.................................................................................... 12 Technical Advisory Panel...................................................................... 14 Wine Classes........................................................................................ 14 General Rules ......................................................................................17 Wine Glossary / Definitions................................................................... 18 Version 2019-1.0 Page !1 GOAL Our goal is to initiate and develop a stable amateur wine
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Compounds As Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity
    foods Review Phenolic Compounds as Markers of Wine Quality and Authenticity Vakare˙ Merkyte˙ 1,2 , Edoardo Longo 1,2,* , Giulia Windisch 1,2 and Emanuele Boselli 1,2 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (G.W.); [email protected] (E.B.) 2 Oenolab, NOI Techpark South Tyrol, Via A. Volta 13B, 39100 Bozen-Bolzano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0471-017691 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 28 November 2020; Published: 1 December 2020 Abstract: Targeted and untargeted determinations are being currently applied to different classes of natural phenolics to develop an integrated approach aimed at ensuring compliance to regulatory prescriptions related to specific quality parameters of wine production. The regulations are particularly severe for wine and include various aspects of the viticulture practices and winemaking techniques. Nevertheless, the use of phenolic profiles for quality control is still fragmented and incomplete, even if they are a promising tool for quality evaluation. Only a few methods have been already validated and widely applied, and an integrated approach is in fact still missing because of the complex dependence of the chemical profile of wine on many viticultural and enological factors, which have not been clarified yet. For example, there is a lack of studies about the phenolic composition in relation to the wine authenticity of white and especially rosé wines. This review is a bibliographic account on the approaches based on phenolic species that have been developed for the evaluation of wine quality and frauds, from the grape varieties (of V.
    [Show full text]
  • BRANCH REPORT ~1973~ •..~ ~ ~ ?I~'" ~~ ",," ~ C)"'\'\
    \A51-1/1973 UNIVERSITY OF P.E.l. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS RES I ~HONLY BRANCH REPORT ~1973~ •..~ ~ ~ ?I~'" ~~ ",," ~ c)"'\'\. ,-" 'V~/ UNIVERSITY OF P. E. 1. GOVERNM~NT DOCUMENTS LISRARY USE ONLY Agriculture 1+ Canada Research Branch Report . 1973 CANADA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE @ Information Canada Ottawa, 1974 Cat. No.: A51-1/1973 CONTENTS Executive of the Research Branch, v Direction de la. recherche, v Organization Chart, vi Organigramme, vi Map' of- Canada, vii Carte du Canada, vii Research Coordinators, viii Coordonnateurs des recherches, viii Administration' and Executive Program, ix Administration et Programmes, executif, ix Foreword, x Avant-propos, xi Research Stations (Eastern) Stations de recherches (Est) St. John's West, Nfld., 1 Charlottetown, P.E.I., 7 Kentville, N.S. 17 Fredericton, N .B., 31 L'Assomption, Que., 41 Lennoxville, Que., 45 Sainte-Foy, Que., 53 Saint-Jean, Que., 65 Delhi, Ont., 75 Harrow; Ont., 81 Ottawa, Ont., 93 Vineland Station, Ont., 109 Research Institutes and Services Instituts et Services de recherches Animal Research Institute, 117 Biosystematics Research Institute, 129 Chemistry and Biology Research Institute, 147 Food Research Institute, 161 Soil Research Institute, 171 Research Institute, London, 183 Engineering Research Service, 191 Ornamentals Research Service, 199 Statistical Research Service, 203 Research Stations (Western) Stations de recherches (Ouest) Brandon, Man., 207 Morden, Man., 215 Winnipeg, Man., 223 Melfort, Sask., 235 Regina, Sask., 243 Saskatoon, Sask., 251 Swift Current, Sask., 265 Beaverlodge, Alta., 277 Lacombe, Alta., 285 Lethbridge, Alta., 293 Agassiz, B.C., 313 Kamloops, B.C., 319 Sidney, B.c., 325 Summerland, B.C., 329 Vancouver, B.C., 341 Index of Professional Staff and Visiting Scientists, 351 Cadres professionneis et chercheurs invites, 351 Subject Index, 361 Table des mat;eres, 361 iii ~s ..::{J.
    [Show full text]
  • Untersuchung Der Transkriptionellen Regulation Von Kandidatengenen Der Pathogenabwehr Gegen Plasmopara Viticola in Der Weinrebe
    Tina Moser Institut für Rebenzüchtung Untersuchung der transkriptionellen Regulation von Kandidatengenen der Pathogenabwehr gegen Plasmopara viticola in der Weinrebe Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-Institut Julius Kühn-Institut Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpfl anzen Kontakt/Contact: Tina Moser Arndtstraße 6 67434 Neustadt Die Schriftenreihe ,,Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-lnstitut" veröffentlicht Doktorarbeiten, die in enger Zusammenarbeit mit Universitäten an lnstituten des Julius Kühn-lnstituts entstanden sind The publication series „Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-lnstitut" publishes doctoral dissertations originating from research doctorates completed at the Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI) either in close collaboration with universities or as an outstanding independent work in the JKI research fields. Der Vertrieb dieser Monographien erfolgt über den Buchhandel (Nachweis im Verzeichnis lieferbarer Bücher - VLB) und OPEN ACCESS im lnternetangebot www.jki.bund.de Bereich Veröffentlichungen. The monographs are distributed through the book trade (listed in German Books in Print - VLB) and OPEN ACCESS through the JKI website www.jki.bund.de (see Publications) Wir unterstützen den offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen. Die Dissertationen aus dem Julius Kühn-lnstitut erscheinen daher OPEN ACCESS. Alle Ausgaben stehen kostenfrei im lnternet zur Verfügung: http://www.jki.bund.de Bereich Veröffentlichungen We advocate open access to scientific knowledge. Dissertations from the Julius Kühn-lnstitut are therefore published open
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal of the European Communities No L 214/ 1
    16 . 8 . 80 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 214/ 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2164/80 of 8 August 1980 amending for the seventh time Regulation ( EEC) No 1608/76 laying down detailed rules for the description and presentation of wines and grape musts THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN on an additional label placed in the same field of COMMUNITIES , vision as the other mandatory information ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the nominal volume of containers with a volume of not less than 5 ml and not more than 10 1 suitable for putting up wines and grape musts which Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No are the subject of intra-Community trade is governed 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organi­ by Council Directive 75/ 106/EEC of 19 December zation of the market in wine ('), as last amended by 1974 on the approximation of the laws of the Regulation (EEC) No 1988 / 80 (2 ), and in particular Member States relating to the making-up by volume Article 54 ( 5) thereof, of certain prepackaged liquids (8 ), as amended by Directive 79/ 1005 /EEC ( 9); whereas it is necessary, Whereas Council Regulation ( EEC) No 355 /79 of first, to adjust Regulation (EEC) No 1608 /76 in line 5 February 1979 laying down general rules for the with the amendments to that Directive and , secondly, description , and presentation of wines and grape in order to enable the wines and grape musts already musts (■'), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Characteristics of Wine Made by Disease Tolerant Varieties
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI UDINE in agreement with FONDAZIONE EDMUND MACH PhD School in Agricultural Science and Biotechnology Cycle XXX Doctoral Thesis Chemical characteristics of wine made by disease tolerant varieties PhD Candidate Supervisor Silvia Ruocco Dr. Urska Vrhovsek Co-Supervisor Prof. Doris Rauhut DEFENCE YEAR 2018 To the best gift that life gave us: to you Nonna Rosa CONTENTS Abstract 1 Aim of the PhD project 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Preface to Chapter 2 17 Chapter 2 The metabolomic profile of red non-V. vinifera genotypes 19 Preface to Chapter 3 and 4 50 Chapter 3 Study of the composition of grape from disease tolerant varieties 56 Chapter 4 Investigation of volatile and non-volatile compounds of wine 79 produced by disease tolerant varieties Concluding remarks 140 Summary of PhD experiences 141 Acknowledgements 142 Abstract Vitis vinifera L. is the most widely cultivated Vitis species around the world which includes a great number of cultivars. Owing to the superior quality of their grapes, these cultivars were long considered the only suitable for the production of high quality wines. However, the lack of resistance genes to fungal diseases like powdery and downy mildew (Uncinula necator and Plasmopara viticola) makes it necessary the application of huge amounts of chemical products in vineyard. Thus, the search for alternative and more sustainable methods to control the major grapevine pathogens have increased the interest in new disease tolerant varieties. Chemical characterisation of these varieties is an important prerequisite to evaluate and promote their use on the global wine market. The aim of this project was to produce a comprehensive study of some promising new disease tolerant varieties recently introduced to the cultivation by identifying the peculiar aspects of their composition and measuring their positive and negative quality traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Elicitation of Grapevine Defense Responses Against Plasmopara Viticola , the Causal Agent of Downy Mildew
    Elicitation of grapevine defense responses against Plasmopara viticola , the causal agent of downy mildew Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fachbereiche der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Durchgeführt am Institut für Phytopathologie und Angewandte Zoologie Vorgelegt von M.Sc. Moustafa Selim aus Kairo, Ägypten Dekan: Prof. Dr. Peter Kämpfer 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Kogel 2. Gutachterin: Prof. Dr. Tina Trenczek Dedication / Widmung I. DEDICATION / WIDMUNG: Für alle, die nach Wissen streben Und ihren Horizont erweitern möchten bereit sind, alles zu geben Und das Unbekannte nicht fürchten Für alle, die bereit sind, sich zu schlagen In der Wissenschaftsschlacht keine Angst haben Wissen ist Macht **************** For all who seek knowledge And want to expand their horizon Who are ready to give everything And do not fear the unknown For all who are willing to fight In the science battle Who have no fear Because Knowledge is power I Declaration / Erklärung II. DECLARATION I hereby declare that the submitted work was made by myself. I also declare that I did not use any other auxiliary material than that indicated in this work and that work of others has been always cited. This work was not either as such or similarly submitted to any other academic authority. ERKLÄRUNG Hiermit erklare ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbststandig angefertigt und nur die angegebenen Quellen and Hilfsmittel verwendet habe und die Arbeit der anderen wurde immer zitiert. Die Arbeit lag in gleicher oder ahnlicher Form noch keiner anderen Prufungsbehorde vor. II Contents III. CONTENTS I. DEDICATION / WIDMUNG……………...............................................................I II. ERKLÄRUNG / DECLARATION .…………………….........................................II III.
    [Show full text]