DOCSLIB.ORG

Programme 426.23 Kb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programme 426.23 Kb ІІ All-Ukrainian Forum of Amalgamated Communities “INITIATIVES THAT CHANGE THE LIFE” 4th December 2017 Mercure Kyiv Congress Hotel (Ex. Cosmopolite hotel), conference-hall “Spielberg”, 6, Vadyma Hetmana Str., Kyiv PROGRAMME 07.40 – 09.30 Registration. Morning coffee 09.30 – 10.30 Ukrainian dimension of decentralisation: results, conclusions, next steps Petro POROSHENKO, President of Ukraine Andriy PARUBIY, Chairperson of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Volodymyr GROISMAN, Prime-Minister of Ukraine 10.30 – 11.00 Greetings from donor community H.E. Hugues MINGARELLI, Ambassador, Head of the EU Delegation to Ukraine Holger TAUSCH, Director of the Swiss Cooperation Office in Ukraine, Co-chair of the Donor Board Janthomas HIEMSTRA, UNDP Country Director in Ukraine 11.00 - 13.00 Session I. Instruments of territorial development 11.00 – 11.10 Video “Initiatives that change the life” Has decentralisation overcome its equator? 11.10 – 11.30 Gennadiy ZUBKO, Vice-Prime Minister – Minister of Regional Development, Construction, Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine 11.30 – 11.50 Maksym BURBAK, People's Deputy of Ukraine, Chairperson of the deputy faction of Political party “PEOPLE’S FRONT” Potential investments and opportunities for small and medium-size business of amalgamated territorial communities 11.50 – 12.05 Daniel BILAK, Chief Investment Advisor to the Prime Minister of Ukraine, CEO UkraineInvest (Office for investments under the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Use of tools provided by the state in the process of communities development 12.05 – 12.20 Oleksandr KORINNYI, Head of the Association of Amalgamated Territorial Communities, Novoukrayinka mayor, Kirovohrad Oblast 2 12.20 – 12.30 Olena TVERDOKHLIB, Knyagynynok village head, Volyn Oblast 12.30 – 12.40 Grygoriy VANZURIAK, Glyboka village settlement head, Chernivtsi Oblast 12.40 – 13.00 Questions and answers 13.00 – 14.00 Lunch Session II. Panel discussion “ATC development: forming the 14.00 – 15.30 investment climate and attracting investment” What does investor require in order to invest into local development Gennadiy CHYZHYKOV, President of Chamber of commerce and industry of Ukraine Alexander MARKUS, Head of German-Ukrainian Chamber of commerce and industry Emma TUROS, Canadian-Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce Antonina KUTOVA, Managing partner, Pro Capital Investment Foreign experience Ian DAVIDSON, Council of Europe Expert, Chief Executive, Tendring District Council, Essex, UK Krzysztof OBRZUT, Wojt of Gmina Rudzynec, Powiat Gliwice, Silesian Voivodeship, Republic of Poland Mechanisms of attracting investment in ATCs of Zaporizhzhia Oblast Kostiantyn BRYL, Head of Zaporizhzhia Oblast State Administration How does the voluntary amalgamation of communities influence on investment opportunities Yuriy BOVA, Trostianets mayor, Sumy Oblast Questions and answers Session III. Panel discussion “ATC development: facilitating small and 15.30 – 17.00 medium-size business development at community level, industrial potential of amalgamated territorial communities” Opportunities for revival of local agricultural potential Maksim MARTYNYUK, First Deputy Minister of Agricultural Policy and Food of Ukraine Business Support Program “Buduj Svoe” (“Build Your own”) Andriy STETSEVYCH, Deputy Chairman of the Board, JSC “Oshchadbank” Dialogue as a tool of supporting reforms in communities development Vaidotas VERBA, the OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine, Ambassador Role of the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions in improving business climate at local level and establishing contacts between municipalities and business Magnus LILLESTROM, Representative of the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions 3 Foreign experience Marcin ZAWADKA, Wojt of Gmina Slupno, Powiat Plocki, Masovian Voivodeship, Republic of Poland Communities’ mini-projects as an effective tool of territorial development Petro KIYASHKO, Vesele village settlement head, Zaporizhzhia Oblast Velina ZAYATS, Dunayivtsi mayor, Khmelnytskyi Oblast Cooperation of territorial communities within the context of local economic development Oleksiy RIABOKON, Pyriatyn mayor, Poltava Oblast Questions and answers 17.00 – 17.30 Coffee-break Session IV. Panel discussion “Spatial planning of ATC territory and 17.30 – 19.00 development strategies” Viacheslav NEHODA, First Deputy Minister of Regional Development, Construction, Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine Yuriy PALEKHA, Deputy Director for researches, Head of Geoinformation Systems Center, DIPROMISTO Institute Anatoliy TKACHUK, Director for science and development, Civil Society Institute Volodymyr KUCHMA, Kipti village head, Chernihiv Oblast Vitalii ZDEBSKYI, Stara Sunyava village settlement head, Khmelnytskyi Oblast Questions and answers 19.00 – 19.15 Forum results Viacheslav NEHODA, First Deputy Minister of Regional Development, Construction, Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine 19.15 – 21.00 Buffet .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amur Oblast TYNDINSKY 361,900 Sq
    AMUR 196 Ⅲ THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST SAKHA Map 5.1 Ust-Nyukzha Amur Oblast TY NDINS KY 361,900 sq. km Lopcha Lapri Ust-Urkima Baikal-Amur Mainline Tynda CHITA !. ZEISKY Kirovsky Kirovsky Zeiskoe Zolotaya Gora Reservoir Takhtamygda Solovyovsk Urkan Urusha !Skovorodino KHABAROVSK Erofei Pavlovich Never SKOVO MAGDAGACHINSKY Tra ns-Siberian Railroad DIRO Taldan Mokhe NSKY Zeya .! Ignashino Ivanovka Dzhalinda Ovsyanka ! Pioner Magdagachi Beketovo Yasny Tolbuzino Yubileiny Tokur Ekimchan Tygda Inzhan Oktyabrskiy Lukachek Zlatoustovsk Koboldo Ushumun Stoiba Ivanovskoe Chernyaevo Sivaki Ogodzha Ust-Tygda Selemdzhinsk Kuznetsovo Byssa Fevralsk KY Kukhterin-Lug NS Mukhino Tu Novorossiika Norsk M DHI Chagoyan Maisky SELE Novovoskresenovka SKY N OV ! Shimanovsk Uglovoe MAZ SHIMA ANOV Novogeorgievka Y Novokievsky Uval SK EN SK Mazanovo Y SVOBODN Chernigovka !. Svobodny Margaritovka e CHINA Kostyukovka inlin SERYSHEVSKY ! Seryshevo Belogorsk ROMNENSKY rMa Bolshaya Sazanka !. Shiroky Log - Amu BELOGORSKY Pridorozhnoe BLAGOVESHCHENSKY Romny Baikal Pozdeevka Berezovka Novotroitskoe IVANOVSKY Ekaterinoslavka Y Cheugda Ivanovka Talakan BRSKY SKY P! O KTYA INSK EI BLAGOVESHCHENSK Tambovka ZavitinskIT BUR ! Bakhirevo ZAV T A M B OVSKY Muravyovka Raichikhinsk ! ! VKONSTANTINO SKY Poyarkovo Progress ARKHARINSKY Konstantinovka Arkhara ! Gribovka M LIKHAI O VSKY ¯ Kundur Innokentevka Leninskoe km A m Trans -Siberianad Railro u 100 r R i v JAO Russian Far East e r By Newell and Zhou / Sources: Ministry of Natural Resources, 2002; ESRI, 2002. Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages CHAPTER 5 Amur Oblast Location Amur Oblast, in the upper and middle Amur River basin, is 8,000 km east of Moscow by rail (or 6,500 km by air).
    [Show full text]
  • Nation Making in Russia's Jewish Autonomous Oblast: Initial Goals
    Nation Making in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast: Initial Goals and Surprising Results WILLIAM R. SIEGEL oday in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast (Yevreiskaya Avtonomnaya TOblast, or EAO), the nontitular, predominately Russian political leadership has embraced the specifically national aspects of their oblast’s history. In fact, the EAO is undergoing a rebirth of national consciousness and culture in the name of a titular group that has mostly disappeared. According to the 1989 Soviet cen- sus, Jews compose only 4 percent (8,887/214,085) of the EAO’s population; a figure that is decreasing as emigration continues.1 In seeking to uncover the reasons for this phenomenon, I argue that the pres- ence of economic and political incentives has motivated the political leadership of the EAO to employ cultural symbols and to construct a history in its effort to legitimize and thus preserve its designation as an autonomous subject of the Rus- sian Federation. As long as the EAO maintains its status as one of eighty-nine federation subjects, the political power of the current elites will be maintained and the region will be in a more beneficial position from which to achieve eco- nomic recovery. The founding in 1928 of the Birobidzhan Jewish National Raion (as the terri- tory was called until the creation of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in 1934) was an outgrowth of Lenin’s general policy toward the non-Russian nationalities. In the aftermath of the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks faced the difficult task of consolidating their power in the midst of civil war. In order to attract the support of non-Russians, Lenin oversaw the construction of a federal system designed to ease the fears of—and thus appease—non-Russians and to serve as an example of Soviet tolerance toward colonized peoples throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euro-Atlantic Integration and the Future of Kaliningrad Oblast
    NATO EURO-ATLANTIC PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS 2000 - 2002 PROGRAMME THE EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION AND THE FUTURE OF KALININGRAD OBLAST by Česlovas Laurinavičius Vilnius - 2002 1 CONTENT Abstract 3 Aim of the Research 4 Methodology 8 1. Main tendencies of Russia’s foreign policy after the collapse of the Soviet Union 9 2. NATO enlargement and Kaliningrad 11 2.1. Military transit of the Russian Federation through the territory of the Republic of 13 Lithuania: historic and political science profile 2.2. Circumstances of the Soviet military withdrawal from the Republic of Lithuania: 15 Negotiations Process 2.3. 1994-1995 negotiations between Vilnius and Moscow over military transit 18 agreement 2.4. Regulation of the military transit of the Russian Federation through the territory of 27 Lithuania and its practical execution 2.5. Intermediate conclusion 29 3. The impact assessment of the EU enlargement on the Kaliningrad oblast 30 3.1. Relations between Moscow and Kaliningrad 30 3.2. The trends of the social, economical and political development in the Kaliningrad 35 oblast of the Russian Federation 3.3. The EU acquis communautaire, the applicant countries and Kaliningrad: issue 37 areas 3.4. Perspectives of the crisis prevention 45 Conclusions 50 2 ABSTRACT The collapse of the Soviet Union has given impetus to the debate about the future of the Kaliningrad Oblast (KO) of the Russian Federation. The main cause for this is the fact that concrete exclave of the Russian Federation – which is the country’s westernmost outpost – has been left cut off from Russia by Lithuania and Poland and surrounded by countries that are orienting themselves toward the European Union and NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.9 Effective TB Control: WHO Strategy for Controlling Tuberculosis
    The work upon which this publication is based was performed in part under Grant Agreement 118-G-00-99-00112 (WHO) and PASA 118-P-00-98-00165 (DHHS/CDC) funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Additional funding was provided by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003 1 Introduction: Managing TB at the Raion Level Module 1 – Table of Contents 1.1 Purpose of the Course .........................................................................................1 1.2 Target Audience..................................................................................................1 1.3 Organization of the Course .................................................................................1 1.3.1 Course Materials To Be Used....................................................................... 1 1.3.2 The Role of a Facilitator............................................................................... 3 1.4 Course Goal and Objectives................................................................................3 1.5 TB Transmission .................................................................................................5 1.6 Global and Regional Burden of TB.....................................................................5 1.7 TB Burden in Russia ...........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation Constitution
    Strasbourg, 4 February 2021 CDL-REF(2021)010 Opinion No. 992 / 2020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) RUSSIAN FEDERATION CONSTITUTION (*) (*) Translation provided by the Constitutional Court This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2021)010 - 2 - THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION adopted by popular vote on 12 December 1993, with amendments approved by all-Russian vote on 1 July 2020 We, the multinational people of the Russian Federation, united by a common fate on our land, establishing human rights and freedoms, civil peace and accord, preserving the historically established State unity, proceeding from universally acknowledged principles of equality and self-determination of peoples, proceeding from universally acknowledged principles of equality and self-determination of peoples, revering the memory of ancestors who have passed on to us their love for the Fatherland and faith in good and justice, reviving the sovereign statehood of Russia and asserting the firmness of its democratic basis, striving to ensure the well-being and prosperity of Russia, proceeding from the responsibility for our Fatherland before present and future generations, recognizing ourselves to be a part of the world community, do hereby adopt THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. SECTION ONE CHAPTER 1 THE BASIS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM Article 1 1. The Russian Federation – Russia is a democratic federative law-governed state with a republican form of government. 2. The names Russian Federation and Russia are equipollent. Article 2 Man, his rights and freedoms shall be the supreme value.
    [Show full text]
  • Koryak Autonomous Okrug
    CHUKOTKA Russian Far East Ayanka Severo-Kamchatsk Slautnoe Oklan MAGADAN Manily Kamenskoe Paren Talovka PENZHINSKY OLYUTORSKY Achavayam Verkhnie Pakhachi Srednie Pakhachi Khailino Pakhachi a Apuka e Tilichiki S Korf Vyvenka g k n s i t SKY Tymlat r ¯ o Lesnaya Ossora e h Karaga B km PALANA k 100 P! KARAGIN Karagin O Island Ivashka f Voyampolka o a Sedanka Tigil e TIGILSKY Map 9.1 S Kovran Ust-Khairyuzovo Koryak Autonomous Khairyuzovo Okrug 301,500 sq. km KORYAKIA KAMCHATKA By Newell and Zhou / Sources: Ministry of Natural Resources, 2002; ESRI, 2002. 312 Ⅲ THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages CHAPTER 9 Koryak Autonomous Okrug (Koryakia) Location The Koryak Autonomous Okrug (Koryakia) covers the northern two-thirds of the Kamchatka Peninsula, the adjoining mainland, and several islands, the largest of which is Karaginsky Island. The northern border with Chukotka and Magadan Oblast runs along the tops of ridges, marking Koryakia as a separate watershed from those territories. The southern border with Kamchatka Oblast marks the beginning of Eurasia’s most dramatic volcanic landscape. Size 301,500 sq. km, or about the size of the U.S. state of Arizona. Climate Koryakia’s subarctic climate is moderated by the Sea of Okhotsk and the North Pacifi c. January temperatures average about –25°c, and July temperatures average 10°c to 14°c. Average annual precipitation for the region is between 300 and 700 mm. Inland areas in the north have a more continental and drier climate, and areas around the Sea of Okhotsk tend to be cooler in winter and summer than those on the Pacifi c shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Compendium
    Country Compendium A companion to the English Style Guide July 2021 Translation © European Union, 2011, 2021. The reproduction and reuse of this document is authorised, provided the sources and authors are acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The right holders and authors shall not be liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. CONTENTS Introduction ...............................................................................1 Austria ......................................................................................3 Geography ................................................................................................................... 3 Judicial bodies ............................................................................................................ 4 Legal instruments ........................................................................................................ 5 Government bodies and administrative divisions ....................................................... 6 Law gazettes, official gazettes and official journals ................................................... 6 Belgium .....................................................................................9 Geography ................................................................................................................... 9 Judicial bodies .......................................................................................................... 10 Legal instruments .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics of the Kaliningrad Exclave and Enclave: Russian and EU Perspectives Alexander Diener
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Geography Faculty Research Geography 7-1-2011 Geopolitics of the Kaliningrad Exclave and Enclave: Russian and EU Perspectives Alexander Diener Joshua Hagen Marshall University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/geography_faculty Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, Physical and Environmental Geography Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hagen, Joshua, and Alexander Diener (2011) Geopolitics of the Kaliningrad Exclave and Enclave: Russian and EU Perspectives, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 52: 4, 567-592. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Faculty Research by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Geopolitics of the Kaliningrad Exclave and Enclave: Russian and EU Perspectives Alexander Diener and Joshua Hagen1 Abstract: Two U.S. political geographers examine a range of geopolitical issues associated with the shifting sovereignty of Russia’s Kaliningrad Oblast (a part of the former German province of East Prussia) during the 20th century, as well as the region’s evolving geopolitical status as a consequence of the European Union’s enlargement to embrace Poland and Lithu- ania. They argue that Kaliningrad today can be considered a “double” borderland, situated simultaneously on the European Union’s border with Russia as well as physically separated from Russia, its home country, by the surrounding land boundaries of EU states. Although technically neither an exclave nor an enclave, they posit that in many ways it resembles both, and as such presents a unique set of problems for economic development and interstate rela- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyumen-Alberta Relations
    Tyumen OblastOblast – – Alberta AlbertaRelations Relations PROFILE DID YOU KNOW? • Tyumen was founded in 1585 and Area: 159,870 km² (excluding Khanty- • Tyumen Oblast, including Khanty- is the oldest city in Siberia. It was Mansii and Yamal-Nenets) Mansii and Yamal-Nenets, is just under formerly an important center of the size of Quebec. trade with China. Capital: Tyumen Russians account for more than two- • Population: 3.4 million (2009) thirds of the population, with RELATIONSHIP OVERVIEW (including Khanty-Mansii and Yamal- Ukrainians constituting the largest Nenets) minority group, many of whom work in • Tyumen Oblast has international the oil and gas sector. agreements with Finland, Austria, Language: Russian • Tyumen Oblast, with its wealth of oil Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Moldova, Belarus, Head of Government: and gas, is the largest exporter in the the province of Lower Saxony Governor Vladimir Yakushev Russian Federation. (since November 2005) (Germany), and the Grampian • The living standards of the residents of Region (Scotland). Political Status: Under the 1993 the town of Tyumen are second only to Alberta signed a cooperation Constitution, Khanty-Mansii and Yamal- those of Moscow in Russia. • agreement with the Tyumen Oblast Nenets became fiscally and • The accelerated development of the oil in 1992. Following changes in the administratively independent of the and gas industry has stimulated the Oblast’s constitution, Alberta also Tyumen government. Khanty-Mansii growth of other economic sectors and signed subsequent cooperation and Yamal-Nenets are thus Autonomous has brought about profound socio- agreements with the Autonomous Okrugs (Districts) within Tyumen Oblast economic changes. Okrugs of Khanty-Mansii (1995) (Province).
    [Show full text]
  • Note on the Impact of the Ongoing Decentralization Process in Communities Affected by the Conflict in the Eastern Region March 2021
    Note on the Impact of the ongoing Decentralization Process in communities affected by the conflict in the Eastern region March 2021 Background and Current state of the art The ongoing decentralization reform in Ukraine (started since 2014) has recently reached the stage of re-designing its sub-regional units – Raions - and finalizing the establishment of the Amalgamated Territorial Communities (ATC, or OTGs in Ukrainian)1. The latter process was formalized in 2020 both in Donetsk and Luhansk2, and became effective as of January 2021 with the following key immediate implications: i) a reduction on the overall number of raions, by merging existing ones. In Luhansk, the number of raions was reduced from 12 to 8 (of which 4 are in GCA); in Donetsk, from 18 to 8 (of which 5 are in GCA); ii) in some cases, the establishment of new geographical areas for the existing Raions’ in relation to coverage of ATC/OTGs – therefore, some ATC/OTGs are being incorporated in new Raions with whom they had no previous interlinkages3; iii) the transfer of functions on provision of essential services both at Raion State Administrations and ATCs/OTGs level as of January 2021. In this regard, the reforms are followed by a significant reduction in the number of staff at Raion level – considering that OTGs are as well expected to take over functions and hire their own staff. The abovementioned process goes in parallel with the setting up of new administrations and re-structuring of territorial boundaries and institutions in ATC/OTG levels alike. Regarding ATC/OTGs new administrations, while elections took place in most ATC/OTGs throughout the country in 2020, electoral processes were cancelled for security reasons4 in some areas along the contact line in Eastern Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine 2014 International Religious Freedom Report
    UKRAINE 2014 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT In February Russian forces occupied Crimea. On March 18, Russia announced Crimea had become part of Russia. UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262, adopted on March 27, and entitled “Territorial Integrity of Ukraine,” states the Autonomous Republic of Crimea remains internationally recognized as within Ukraine’s international borders. The U.S. government does not recognize the attempted annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and considers Crimea still to be a part of Ukraine. UKRAINE Executive Summary The constitution protects freedom of religion and belief and provides for the separation of church and state. According to the law on religion, the objective of domestic religious policy is to foster the creation of a tolerant society and provide for freedom of conscience and worship. Religious leaders urged an end to politically-motivated religious assaults and other violence in the stand-off between the Yanukovych government and anti-regime protesters. Religious and political groups both called for the Yanukovych government to cease threats to end the religious activities of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) after the UGCC had ministered to the protesters, and to end its incitement of anti-Semitic acts as part of a public campaign to discredit the political opposition. Following the changeover to a transitional administration and then under the Poroshenko government, religious leaders called for dialogue and reconciliation between all sectarian and political groups in support of national unity. In April Russian-backed separatists proclaimed the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics (“DPR” and “LPR”) in the region known as the “Donbas.” The separatists kidnapped, beat, and threatened Protestants, Catholics, and members of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kyiv Patriarchate (UOC-KP) and participated in anti-Semitic acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Implementing Regulation (Eu)
    17.3.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on L 91/7 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/460 of 16 March 2021 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards the entry for Ukraine in the list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which certain poultry commodities may be imported into and transit through the Union in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (1), and in particular the introductory phrase of Article 8, the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of Article 8, paragraph 4 of Article 8 and Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 2009/158/EC of 30 November 2009 on animal health conditions governing intra- Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs (2), and in particular Articles 23(1), 24(2) and 25(2) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 (3) lays down veterinary certification requirements for imports into and transit, including storage during transit, through the Union of poultry and poultry products (‘the commodities’). It provides that the commodities are only to be imported into and transit through the Union from the third countries, territories, zones or compartments listed in columns 1 and 3 of the table in Part 1 of Annex I thereto.
    [Show full text]