DOCSLIB.ORG

Cross Border Cooperation Strategy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship, Lviv, Volyn and Brest Oblasts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cross Border Cooperation Strategy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship, Lviv, Volyn and Brest Oblasts okładka CROSS BORDER COOPERATION STRATEGY OF THE LUBELSKIE VOIVODESHIP, LVIV, VOLYN AND BREST OBLASTS FOR 2014 – 2020 „Working Group for the development of the „Cross Border Cooperation Strategy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship, Lviv, Volyn and Brest Oblasts for 2014 – 2020”” Lubelskie Voivodeship Bogdan Kawałko, Dorota Skwarek, Magdalena Fotek – Kułak, Olga Grzechnik, Mo- nika Majewska, Bartosz Tereszczuk, Magdalena Figura – Wrona (Regional Policy Department of Lubelskie Voivodeship Marshal Offi ce) Brest Oblast Yuri Kolesov (Brest Oblast Executive Committee), Nikolaj Kuzmicki (Centre for Dis- semination of Information and Education in the Brest Department of the Ministry for Extraordinary Situations), Aleksandr Pańko (Brest University) Lviv Oblast Diana Kodrowa (Lviv Oblast State Administration), Liudmyla Oldak (Lviv Oblast Council) CROSS BORDER COOPERATION STRATEGY OF THE LUBELSKIE VOIVODESHIP, LVIV, Volyn Oblast Natalia Krolik, Walentyna Gnasiuk – Terlecka (Volyn Oblast State Administration), Alla Yatseniuk (Volyn Oblast Council) VOLYN AND BREST OBLASTS FOR 2014-2020 Coordinator Bogdan Kawałko (Regional Policy Department of the Lubelskie Voivodeship Marshal Offi ce in Lublin) External expert prof. Andrzej Miszczuk (University of Warsaw) Cooperation: Participation in the working group and preparation of materials for the diagnostic part: Krzysztof Markowski, Andrzej Matacz, Andrzej Jakubowski, Jerzy Greszta (Statistical Of- fi ce in Lublin),Offi ce for Spatial Planning in Lublin The Cross Border Association Euroregion Bug in Chełm ISBN 978 - 83 - 942280 -2 -6 © Copyright by: Lubelskie Voivodeship Marshal Offi ce in Lublin ul. Spokojna 4, 20-074 Lublin www.lubelskie.pl DTP and print: 29 COLORS ul. Lubelska 29, 71 - 043 Szczecin www.29colors.pl Lublin, April 2014 2 3 Introduction Border areas, owing to their special role played in various development pro- cesses, are of key importance to regional policy both on the European Union level as well as in particular states and regions. In the case of border regions, the effi ciency of that policy depends largely on developing joint, long-term cross border cooperation attitudes that could be expressed and encapsulated in proper strategic documents. „Cross Border Cooperation Strategy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship, Lviv, Volyn and Brest Oblasts for 2014-2020” is a document which specifi es the goals and directions of the development of cross border cooperation. It constitutes another crucial step towards deepening the cooperation initiated in the middle of the 1990s of the XX century between the Lubelskie Voivodeship and the neigh- boring oblasts in the Ukraine and Belarus. It is, at the same time, the fi rst such European-level document prepared for the cross border area located along the external border of the EU. The Strategy document, accepted by the authorities of the partner oblasts: Volyn and Lviv in the Ukraine and the Brest Oblast in Belarus, is a result of work initiated by the Lubelskie Voivodeship authorities at the request of the Marshal. The Strategy is an effect of joint efforts conducted with partners from the Volyn Oblast Council, Lviv Oblast Council, Lviv State Administration, Volyn Oblast State Administration and the Brest Oblast Executive Committee, which, in itself, is an important fulfi llment of interregional cooperation agreements signed between the Lubelskie Voivodeship and the neighboring regions. This initiative has also obtained aid and fi nancial support of the Republic of Poland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs as part of the competition „Support of the civic and self-government di- mension of the Polish foreign policy in 2013”, within which a project was published entitled: „Building partnerships for the development of the Cross Border Strategy for 2014-2020”. The goals prepared and included in the Strategy are adequate to the most rel- evant development problems and challenges that were identifi ed and confi rmed in the social consultations process. They are oriented toward effective use of en- dogenous potentials in the scope of economic cooperation, tourism and scientifi c opportunities as well as mitigating limitations inherent to the external EU border through the improvement of external and internal transport accessibility. We hope that the „Cross Border Cooperation Strategy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship, Lviv, Volyn and Brest Oblasts for 2014-2020” will fulfi ll both the joint expectations as well as its role in the dynamic shaping of the future of our regions. Realization of the Strategy shall prepare the cross border area regions for the new European Neighborhood Policy in the 2014-2020 perspective and for more effec- tive use of the funds of the Cross Border Cooperation Programme Poland-Bela- rus-Ukraine 2014-2020, which shall contribute to improving its competitiveness and attractiveness in a European dimension. April 2014 6 7 Table of Contents 1.INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................9 1.1. Premises and circumstances of Strategy’s development..........................................9 1.2. Strategy preparation methodology............................................................................13 1.3. Development of regions and cross border cooperation – European experiences....................19 2. CROSS BORDER COOPERATION POTENTIAL..............................................................25 2.1. Economic potential...................................................................................................25 2.2. Ecological potential..................................................................................................39 2.3. Socio-demographic potential...................................................................................47 1.1 2.4. Infrastructure potential.............................................................................................63 1. 2.5. Tourism potential.......................................................................................................75 INTRODUCTION 2.6. Summary – SWOT analysis of the cross border region..........................................83 3.GOALS AND DIRECTIONS OF CROSS BORDER COOPERATION................................87 REMISES AND 3.1. General Strategy objective.......................................................................................87 P 3.2. Goals and directions of cooperation within strategic activities.............................89 3.2.1. Economic cooperation....................................................................................90 CIRCUMSTANCES OF 3.2.2. Natural environment, culture and tourism.....................................................91 3.2.3 Transport and border infrastructure..............................................................94 TRATEGY S DEVELOPMENT 3.2.4. Science and higher education.......................................................................96 S ’ 4. IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM..............................................................................................99 5. SOURCES OF FINANCING...............................................................................................101 6. MONITORING SYSTEM.....................................................................................................103 7. WORKING ON THE STRATEGY........................................................................................105 8. ANNEX................................................................................................................................109 List of the submitted recommended projects................................................................110 Economic cooperation.............................................................................................110 Natural environment, culture and tourism..............................................................110 Transport and border infrastructure.........................................................................111 Science and higher education.................................................................................111 Statistical annex...............................................................................................................112 Cross Border Cooperation Strategy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship, Economy....................................................................................................................112 Lviv, Volyn and Brest Oblasts for 2014-2020, constitutes another Environment and environmental protection...........................................................116 crucial step towards deepening cross border cooperation initiated Population and work resources...............................................................................117 in the middle of the 1990s of the XX century between the Lubelskie Transport and border infrastructure........................................................................133 Voivodeship and the neighboring oblasts in the Ukraine and Belarus. Higher education, tourism and culture...................................................................133 8 Considering the strategic partnership of Poland and Ukraine as well as the important role of cross border cooperation with Belarus, there is a need to create long-term cooperation-oriented attitudes in the Lubelskie Voivodeship and three border regions. Currently the cross border location, to a large extent, has been contributing to the peripheral nature 11.1. of these regions and was one of the Considering that the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020
    Annex no. 1 to Resolution no. 458/XXII/12 Of the Sejmik of Pomorskie Voivodeship of 24th September 2012 on adoption of Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 GDAŃSK 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OUTPUT SITUATION ………………………………………………………… 6 II. SCENARIOS AND VISION OF DEVELOPMENT ………………………… 18 THE PRINCIPLES OF STRATEGY AND ROLE OF THE SELF- III. 24 GOVERNMENT OF THE VOIVODESHIP ………..………………………… IV. CHALLENGES AND OBJECTIVES …………………………………………… 28 V. IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM ………………………………………………… 65 3 4 The shape of the Pomorskie Voivodeship Development Strategy 2020 is determined by 8 assumptions: 1. The strategy is a tool for creating development targeting available financial and regulatory instruments. 2. The strategy covers only those issues on which the Self-Government of Pomorskie Voivodeship and its partners in the region have a real impact. 3. The strategy does not include purely local issues unless there is a close relationship between the local needs and potentials of the region and regional interest, or when the local deficits significantly restrict the development opportunities. 4. The strategy does not focus on issues of a routine character, belonging to the realm of the current operation and performing the duties and responsibilities of legal entities operating in the region. 5. The strategy is selective and focused on defining the objectives and courses of action reflecting the strategic choices made. 6. The strategy sets targets amenable to verification and establishment of commitments to specific actions and effects. 7. The strategy outlines the criteria for identifying projects forming part of its implementation. 8. The strategy takes into account the specific conditions for development of different parts of the voivodeship, indicating that not all development challenges are the same everywhere in their nature and seriousness.
    [Show full text]
  • IV SA/Wa 558/07 - Judgment of the Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw LEX No 460565 Judgment of the Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw of 8 November 2007
    IV SA/Wa 558/07 - Judgment of the Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw LEX No 460565 Judgment of the Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw of 8 November 2007. IV SA/Wa 558/07 THESIS (current) A resolution of the regional council concerning the spatial development plan of the voivodship is not an act of local law and thus does not have any direct legal effect. Since the resolution is not universally binding, it does not interfere with the applicants' proprietary rights with respect to the plots of land through which the planned road route is to run. It is only at the stage of the planning work and adoption of the local spatial development plan that the applicants will be able to raise such an objection. JUSTIFICATION Chairperson: WSA Judge Małgorzata Miron. WSA Judges: Alina Balicka (spr.), Assessor Marta Laskowska. Protokolant: Dominik Nowak. Sentence The Regional Administrative Court in Warsaw, having examined on the hearing on 8 November 2007 the case of Elżbieta K. and Janusz K. against the resolution No. 65/2004 of the Regional Assembly of the Mazowieckie Voivodeship of 7 June 2004 on adopting the Spatial Development Plan for the Mazowieckie Voivodeship - dismisses the complaint. Factual reasons By Resolution No. 65/2004 of 7 June 2004, the Regional Assembly of the Mazowieckie Voivodeship acting on the basis of Article 18 point 3 of the Act of 5 June 1998 on regional self- government (Journal of Laws 2001 No. 142, item 1510 as amended) in connection with Article 85 point 2 of the Act of 27 March 2003 on spatial planning and development (Journal of Laws No.
    [Show full text]
  • Societies East European Politics &
    East European Politics & Societies http://eep.sagepub.com Leading the Way to Regionalization in Post-Communist Europe: An Examination of the Process and Outcomes of Regional Reform in Poland Jennifer A. Yoder East European Politics and Societies 2007; 21; 424 DOI: 10.1177/0888325407303786 The online version of this article can be found at: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/3/424 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: American Council of Learned Societies Additional services and information for East European Politics & Societies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/3/424 Downloaded from http://eep.sagepub.com at Glasgow University Library on January 9, 2009 Leading the Way to Regionalization in Post-Communist Europe: An Examination of the Process and Outcomes of Regional Reform in Poland Jennifer A. Yoder* This article examines Poland’s process of regionalization since the late 1990s. It identifies several factors that led Poland to introduce self-government at the regional level both earlier and to a greater extent than its neighbors in East Central Europe. The analysis then turns to the competences and financing of the Polish regions, or voivodeships. Although Poland has taken steps to decentralize, it remains a unitary state. Keywords: Poland; decentralization; regionalization; regions; self-government In 1998, the Poles elected members of new regional councils, fol- lowed by the Czechs in 2000, and the Slovaks in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Potential of the Western Ukrainian Borderland
    Journal of Geography, Politics and Society 2017, 7(2), 17–23 DOI 10.4467/24512249JG.17.011.6627 HUMAN POTENTIAL OF THE WESTERN UKRAINIAN BORDERLAND Iryna Hudzelyak (1), Iryna Vanda (2) (1) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author) (2) Chair of Economic and Social Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Doroshenka 41, 79000 Lviv, Ukraine, e-mail: [email protected] Citation Hudzelyak I., Vanda I., 2017, Human potential of the Western Ukrainian borderland, Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 7(2), 17–23. Abstract This article contains the analysis made with the help of generalized quantative parameters, which shows the tendencies of hu- man potential formation of the Western Ukrainian borderland during 2001–2016. The changes of number of urban and rural population in eighteen borderland rayons in Volyn, Lviv and Zakarpattia oblasts are evaluated. The tendencies of urbanization processes and resettlement of rural population are described. Spatial differences of age structure of urban and rural population are characterized. Key words Western Ukrainian borderland, human potential, population, depopulation, aging of population. 1. Introduction during the period of closed border had more so- cial influence from the West, which formed specific Ukraine has been going through the process of model of demographic behavior and reflected in dif- depopulation for some time; it was caused with ferent features of the human potential. significant reduction in fertility and essential mi- The category of human potential was developed gration losses of reproductive cohorts that lasted in economic science and conceptually was related almost a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Amur Oblast TYNDINSKY 361,900 Sq
    AMUR 196 Ⅲ THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST SAKHA Map 5.1 Ust-Nyukzha Amur Oblast TY NDINS KY 361,900 sq. km Lopcha Lapri Ust-Urkima Baikal-Amur Mainline Tynda CHITA !. ZEISKY Kirovsky Kirovsky Zeiskoe Zolotaya Gora Reservoir Takhtamygda Solovyovsk Urkan Urusha !Skovorodino KHABAROVSK Erofei Pavlovich Never SKOVO MAGDAGACHINSKY Tra ns-Siberian Railroad DIRO Taldan Mokhe NSKY Zeya .! Ignashino Ivanovka Dzhalinda Ovsyanka ! Pioner Magdagachi Beketovo Yasny Tolbuzino Yubileiny Tokur Ekimchan Tygda Inzhan Oktyabrskiy Lukachek Zlatoustovsk Koboldo Ushumun Stoiba Ivanovskoe Chernyaevo Sivaki Ogodzha Ust-Tygda Selemdzhinsk Kuznetsovo Byssa Fevralsk KY Kukhterin-Lug NS Mukhino Tu Novorossiika Norsk M DHI Chagoyan Maisky SELE Novovoskresenovka SKY N OV ! Shimanovsk Uglovoe MAZ SHIMA ANOV Novogeorgievka Y Novokievsky Uval SK EN SK Mazanovo Y SVOBODN Chernigovka !. Svobodny Margaritovka e CHINA Kostyukovka inlin SERYSHEVSKY ! Seryshevo Belogorsk ROMNENSKY rMa Bolshaya Sazanka !. Shiroky Log - Amu BELOGORSKY Pridorozhnoe BLAGOVESHCHENSKY Romny Baikal Pozdeevka Berezovka Novotroitskoe IVANOVSKY Ekaterinoslavka Y Cheugda Ivanovka Talakan BRSKY SKY P! O KTYA INSK EI BLAGOVESHCHENSK Tambovka ZavitinskIT BUR ! Bakhirevo ZAV T A M B OVSKY Muravyovka Raichikhinsk ! ! VKONSTANTINO SKY Poyarkovo Progress ARKHARINSKY Konstantinovka Arkhara ! Gribovka M LIKHAI O VSKY ¯ Kundur Innokentevka Leninskoe km A m Trans -Siberianad Railro u 100 r R i v JAO Russian Far East e r By Newell and Zhou / Sources: Ministry of Natural Resources, 2002; ESRI, 2002. Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages CHAPTER 5 Amur Oblast Location Amur Oblast, in the upper and middle Amur River basin, is 8,000 km east of Moscow by rail (or 6,500 km by air).
    [Show full text]
  • Silesia, Poland - Regional Profile 1
    SILESIA, POLAND - REGIONAL PROFILE 1 REGIONAL PROFILE Silesia GENERAL INFORMATION Country: Poland Region Name: Silesia Region NUTS2 code*: PL22 - Silesia Region NUTS3 code PL22A - Katowicki / PL228 Bytomski PL229 - Gliwicki / PL227 - Rybnicki PL22B - Sosnowiecki / PL22C - Tyski Main urban centres in the region (by population): Katowice - 294,510 / Częstochowa - 222,292 Sosnowiec - 202,036 / Gliwice - 179,806 Zabrze - 173,374 / Bielsko-Biała - 171,259 Bytom - 166,795 / Rybnik - 138,696 Ruda Śląska - 138,000 / Tychy - 127,831 *NUTS: Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics NOTICE ON COVID-19 The data contained within this regional profile was primarily gathered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is recognised that the pandemic has had an adverse impact on energy demand. Although the consequences and implications are significant, they remain emergent and dynamic. An update to this document should be considered, once these consequences and implications are clearer and more quantifiable. INITIATIVE FOR COAL REGIONS IN TRANSITION SILESIA, POLAND - REGIONAL PROFILE 2 Overview Silesia is the most populated and urbanised region in Poland with over 4.5 million inhabitants. 78% of its population live in cities and its population density is 370 people/km2. The region comprises of eight NUTS-3 subregions, out of which six are notably affected by coal mining and related industries. The communities where the majority of the miners live are located in central and western subregions - namely Katowicki subregion, Bytomski subregion, Gliwicki subregion, Rybnicki subregion, Sosnowiecki subregion, and Tyski subregion. Silesia is the most coal-dependent region in Poland with mining playing an important role in the regional economy. However, its gradual decline in recent years is also apparent as production is declining in view of falling productivity and low profitability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Firing Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin
    October 9, 2015, Vol. 2, Issue 3 Obstruction Of Justice The case for fi ring Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin Special coverage pages 4-15 Editors’ Note Contents This seventh issue of the Legal Quarterly is devoted to three themes – or three Ps: prosecu- 4 Interview: tors, privatization, procurement. These are key areas for Ukraine’s future. Lawmaker Yegor Sobolev explains why he is leading drive In the fi rst one, prosecutors, all is not well. More than 110 lawmakers led by Yegor Sobolev to dump Shokin are calling on President Petro Poroshenko to fi re Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin. Not only has Shokin failed to prosecute high-level crime in Ukraine, but critics call him the chief ob- 7 Selective justice, lack of due structionist to justice and accuse him of tolerating corruption within his ranks. “They want process still alive in Ukraine to spearhead corruption, not fi ght it,” Sobolev said of Shokin’s team. The top prosecutor has Opinion: never agreed to be interviewed by the Kyiv Post. 10 US ambassador says prosecutors As for the second one, privatization, this refers to the 3,000 state-owned enterprises that sabotaging fi ght against continue to bleed money – more than $5 billion alone last year – through mismanagement corruption in Ukraine and corruption. But large-scale privatization is not likely to happen soon, at least until a new law on privatization is passed by parliament. The aim is to have public, transparent, compet- 12 Interview: itive tenders – not just televised ones. The law, reformers say, needs to prevent current state Shabunin says Poroshenko directors from looting companies that are sold and ensure both state and investor rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine
    Public Council of All-Ukrainian Environmental NGOs under the aegis of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs for preparation to Fifth Pan-European Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe" Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs Кyiv — 2003 Public Evaluation of Environmental Policy in Ukraine. Report of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs. — Kyiv, 2003. — 139 pages The document is prepared by the Organising Committee of Ukrainian Environmental NGOs in the framework of the «Program of Measures for Preparation and Conduction of 5th Pan-European Ministerial Conference» «Environment for Europe» for 2002–2003» approved by the National Organising Committee of Ukraine. Preparation and publication of the report was done wit the support of: Regional Ecological Center - REC-Kyiv; Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources of Ukraine; Milieukontakt Oost Europa in the framework of the project «Towards Kyiv-2003» with financial support of the Ministry of Territorial Planning, Construction and the Environment; UN office in Ukraine Contents Foreword . 1. Environmental Policy and Legislation . 1.1. Legislative Background of Environmental Policy . 1.2. Main State Documents Defining Environmental Policy . 1.3. Enforcement of Constitution of Ukraine . 1.4. Implementation of Environmental Legislation . 1.5. State of Ukrainian Legislation Reforming after Aarhus Convention Ratification . 1.6.Ukraine's Place in Transition towards Sustainable Development . 2. Environmental Management . 2.1. Activities of State Authorities . 2.2 Activities of State Control Authorities . 2.3. Environmental Monitoring System . 2.4. State Environmental Expertise . 2.5. Activities of Local Administrations in the Field of Environment .
    [Show full text]
  • Volyn Oblast Q3 2019
    Business Outlook Survey ResultsРезультати of surveys опитувань of Vinnitsa керівників region * enterprisesпідприємств managers м. Києва of regarding Volyn і Київської O blasttheir області щодоbusiness їх ділових expectations очікувань* * Q3 2019 I квартал 2018Q2 2018року *Надані результати є*This відображенням survey only reflectsлише думкиthe opinions респондентів of respondents – керівників in Volyn підприємств oblast (top managersВінницької of області в IІ кварталіcompanies) 2018 року who і wereне є прогнозамиpolled in Q3 та201 оцінками9, and does Національного not represent банку NBU forecastsУкраїни. or estimates res Business Outlook Survey of Volyn Oblast Q3 2019 A survey of companies carried out in Volyn oblast in Q3 2019 showed that respondents continued to have high expectations that the Ukrainian economy would grow, and that their companies would continue to develop over the next 12 months. Inflation expectations softened, while depreciation expectations increased. The top managers of companies said they expected that over the next 12 months: . the output of Ukrainian goods and services would grow at a slower pace: the balance of expectations was 38.5% compared with 61.5% in Q2 2019 (Figure 1) and 30.5% across Ukraine . the growth in prices for consumer goods and services would be moderate: most respondents (84.6%) said that inflation would not exceed 10.0% compared with 61.5% in the previous quarter and 73.3% of respondents across Ukraine. Respondents continued to refer to production costs and hryvnia exchange rate fluctuations as the main inflation drivers (Figure 2) . the hryvnia would depreciate at a faster pace: 83.3% of respondents (compared with 76.9% in the previous quarter) expected the hryvnia to weaken against the US dollar, with the figure across Ukraine being 69.0% .
    [Show full text]
  • Nation Making in Russia's Jewish Autonomous Oblast: Initial Goals
    Nation Making in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast: Initial Goals and Surprising Results WILLIAM R. SIEGEL oday in Russia’s Jewish Autonomous Oblast (Yevreiskaya Avtonomnaya TOblast, or EAO), the nontitular, predominately Russian political leadership has embraced the specifically national aspects of their oblast’s history. In fact, the EAO is undergoing a rebirth of national consciousness and culture in the name of a titular group that has mostly disappeared. According to the 1989 Soviet cen- sus, Jews compose only 4 percent (8,887/214,085) of the EAO’s population; a figure that is decreasing as emigration continues.1 In seeking to uncover the reasons for this phenomenon, I argue that the pres- ence of economic and political incentives has motivated the political leadership of the EAO to employ cultural symbols and to construct a history in its effort to legitimize and thus preserve its designation as an autonomous subject of the Rus- sian Federation. As long as the EAO maintains its status as one of eighty-nine federation subjects, the political power of the current elites will be maintained and the region will be in a more beneficial position from which to achieve eco- nomic recovery. The founding in 1928 of the Birobidzhan Jewish National Raion (as the terri- tory was called until the creation of the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in 1934) was an outgrowth of Lenin’s general policy toward the non-Russian nationalities. In the aftermath of the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks faced the difficult task of consolidating their power in the midst of civil war. In order to attract the support of non-Russians, Lenin oversaw the construction of a federal system designed to ease the fears of—and thus appease—non-Russians and to serve as an example of Soviet tolerance toward colonized peoples throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Final RIS3 Strategy Lubelskie
    REGIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR THE LUBELSKIE VOIVODESHIP 2020 REGIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR SMART SPECIALISATION (RIS3) 1 TASK TEAM FOR UPDATING THE REGIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR THE LUBELSKIE VOIVODESHIP 2020 Sławomir Sosnowski, Krzysztof Hetman, Krzysztof Grabczuk, Michał Cholewa, Jacek Sobczak, Tomasz Pękalski, Artur Walasek, Elżbieta Mocior, Artur Habza, Piotr Janczarek, Krzysztof Bartuzi, Edmund Bożeński, Katarzyna Bryda, Izabela Byzdra, Dariusz Donica, Piotr Franaszek, Bogdan Kawałko, Iwona Nakielska, Zbigniew Orzeł, Aneta Pieczykolan, Waldemar Rudnicki, Małgorzata Sokół, Sławomir Struski, Henryk Szych. CHIEF CONSULTANT Prof. Anna Rogut, PhD EXTERNAL EXPERTS Ryszard Boguszewski Dariusz Mazurkiewicz, PhD, DSc Korneliusz Pylak, PhD ELABORATION AND COORDINATION OF WORK Department of Economy and Innovation Marshal Office of the Lubelskie Voivodeship in Lublin Radosław Dudziński, Bartłomiej Pocztowski, Elwira Rycaj IN COOPERATION WITH Prof. Iwona Hofman, PhD The authors of this document would like to thank for their valuable contribution to Prof. Paweł Churski, PhD, Prof. Andrzej Miszczuk, Jacek Wojciechowicz, as well as for drafting the RIS LV 2020 to Mariusz Bobel, Ilona Dąbrowska, Kornelia Leszko, Paweł Koziej, Anna Ososińska. ISBN 978-83-940435-9-9 2 Dear Readers, I am pleased to present you with the Regional Innovation Strategy for the Lubelskie Voivodeship 2020. I believe that the assumptions developed and presented in this document will have an actual impact on starting the innovative transformation process for the enterprises as well as the economy of the Lubelskie Voivodeship. Development policy faces the challenge of building an economy based on innovation and intellectual and social capital. It is crucial to derive benefits from the endogenous potentials of those regions which can make a significant contribution to the voivodeship’s development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Euro-Atlantic Integration and the Future of Kaliningrad Oblast
    NATO EURO-ATLANTIC PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS 2000 - 2002 PROGRAMME THE EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION AND THE FUTURE OF KALININGRAD OBLAST by Česlovas Laurinavičius Vilnius - 2002 1 CONTENT Abstract 3 Aim of the Research 4 Methodology 8 1. Main tendencies of Russia’s foreign policy after the collapse of the Soviet Union 9 2. NATO enlargement and Kaliningrad 11 2.1. Military transit of the Russian Federation through the territory of the Republic of 13 Lithuania: historic and political science profile 2.2. Circumstances of the Soviet military withdrawal from the Republic of Lithuania: 15 Negotiations Process 2.3. 1994-1995 negotiations between Vilnius and Moscow over military transit 18 agreement 2.4. Regulation of the military transit of the Russian Federation through the territory of 27 Lithuania and its practical execution 2.5. Intermediate conclusion 29 3. The impact assessment of the EU enlargement on the Kaliningrad oblast 30 3.1. Relations between Moscow and Kaliningrad 30 3.2. The trends of the social, economical and political development in the Kaliningrad 35 oblast of the Russian Federation 3.3. The EU acquis communautaire, the applicant countries and Kaliningrad: issue 37 areas 3.4. Perspectives of the crisis prevention 45 Conclusions 50 2 ABSTRACT The collapse of the Soviet Union has given impetus to the debate about the future of the Kaliningrad Oblast (KO) of the Russian Federation. The main cause for this is the fact that concrete exclave of the Russian Federation – which is the country’s westernmost outpost – has been left cut off from Russia by Lithuania and Poland and surrounded by countries that are orienting themselves toward the European Union and NATO.
    [Show full text]