DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Municipal Service Review Volume Ii—Utility Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Municipal Service Review Volume Ii—Utility Services FINAL MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW VOLUME II—UTILITY SERVICES Report to the Alameda Local Agency Formation Commission Upper San Leandro Reservoir Photo Credit: Charles Webber, California Academy of Sciences © 2002 Prepared by Burr Consulting In association with CDM Braitman & Associates P&D Consultants Accepted on November 10, 2005 FINAL MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW VOLUME II—UTILITY SERVICES Report to the Alameda Local Agency Formation Commission Submitted to: Alameda LAFCo Lou Ann Texeira, Executive Officer 1221 Oak Street, Room 555 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 271-5142 Submitted by: Burr Consulting Beverly Burr, Project Coordinator 612 N. Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 8 Los Angeles, CA 90049 (310) 889-0077 In association with CDM Braitman & Associates P&D Consultants Accepted on November 10, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................... X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 DETERMINATIONS ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 31 LAFCO OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 31 MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW ORIGINS ................................................................................................................... 32 MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................ 34 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATES ............................................................................................................................. 35 MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW PROCESS ................................................................................................................... 37 CHAPTER 2: AGENCY OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................... 39 SERVICE PROVIDERS ................................................................................................................................................ 39 GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................................... 42 GROWTH STRATEGIES AND AREAS .......................................................................................................................... 50 CHAPTER 3: WATER SERVICES ........................................................................................................................ 54 PROVIDER OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 54 SERVICE DEMAND ................................................................................................................................................... 63 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFICIENCIES ............................................................................................................ 71 SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADEQUACY ................................................................................................................... 82 FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES...................................................................................................... 90 POLICY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 100 CHAPTER 4: WASTEWATER SERVICES ........................................................................................................ 117 SERVICE OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 117 SERVICE DEMAND ................................................................................................................................................. 125 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFICIENCIES .......................................................................................................... 129 SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADEQUACY ................................................................................................................. 137 FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES.................................................................................................... 142 POLICY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 149 CHAPTER 5: FLOOD CONTROL SERVICES .................................................................................................. 171 SERVICE OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 171 SERVICE DEMAND ................................................................................................................................................. 175 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFICIENCIES............................................................................................................ 178 SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADEQUACY ................................................................................................................. 181 FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................................... 183 POLICY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 186 CHAPTER 6: STORMWATER SERVICES ........................................................................................................ 189 SERVICE OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 189 SERVICE DEMAND ................................................................................................................................................. 192 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFICIENCIES............................................................................................................ 194 SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADEQUACY ................................................................................................................. 196 FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................................... 203 POLICY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 207 CHAPTER 7: SOLID WASTE SERVICES .......................................................................................................... 212 SERVICE OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 212 i ALAMEDA LAFCO UTILITY MSR SERVICE DEMAND ................................................................................................................................................. 214 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFICIENCIES .......................................................................................................... 216 SERVICE STANDARDS AND ADEQUACY ................................................................................................................. 219 FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES.................................................................................................... 221 POLICY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 226 CHAPTER 8: RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICES .............................................................................. 230 SERVICE OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 230 SERVICE DEMAND ................................................................................................................................................. 231 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OR DEFICIENCIES .......................................................................................................... 232 FINANCING CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES.................................................................................................... 233 POLICY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 234 CHAPTER 9: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OPTIONS ......................................................................................... 240 ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ..................................................... 241 ALAMEDA COUNTY RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT .................................................................................... 242 ALAMEDA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 Utility Honorees Utility of the Future Today
    2016 Utility Honorees Utility of the Future Today 1 The partners of the Utility of the Future Today are pleased to present the inaugural program’s 61 public and private utilities from across the U.S., Canada, and Denmark selected by a peer committee of utility leaders from an impressive number of first year entries. The recipients were recognized and honored during a September 27 ceremony held in conjunction with WEFTEC 2016 in New OrleansWEF’s 89th annual technical exhibition and conferenceas well as a number of commensurate events sponsored by the partners. The recipients received a display flag and a special certificate to further identify and promote their outstanding achievement as a Utility of the Future Today. The following 61 utilities have met the criteria for Utility of the Future Today by meeting the Organizational Culture requirement plus at least one of the Activities identified above. Recognized Activities are indicated for each utility as identified by a and are listed in alphabetical order. 2 Table of Contents Background 6 Program Purpose 7 Aarhus Vand, Denmark 8 Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority, NM 17 Alexandria Renew Enterprises, VA 23 Avon Lake Regional Water, OH 34 Baltimore City Department of Public Works, MD 38 Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority, NJ 50 Charlotte Water, NC 61 City of Cedar Rapids, IA 71 City of Fayetteville, AR 76 City of Fond du Lac, WI 80 City of Grand Rapids, MI 86 City of Gresham, OR 94 City of Los Angeles – LA Sanitation, CA 99 City of Roseville, CA 108 City of San
    [Show full text]
  • Birdathon 2010 Bay Area Burrowing Owls Face Many Challenges
    vol. 95 no. 4 May 2010 the newsletter of the golden gate audubon society founded 1917 Join the Fun! Birdathon 2010 here is still time to sign up for Birdathon T 2010 if you don’t delay. You can enjoy exhilarating bird sightings in your backyard, along our shorelines, or farther afi eld—and help Golden Gate Audubon support our important conservation and education programs. The spirit of friendly competition is in the air—along with the many bird species migrating through the Bay Area this time of the year. Sign up today to join this fun event, which is suitable for the entire family and community. Mary Malec With just two weeks left before the May 16 Western Burrowing Owl eating a caterpillar, at Cesar Chavez Park, Berkeley. completion date, you and your friends and fam- ily can get involved in the Birdathon by signing up online, over the phone, or in person at our Bay Area Burrowing Owls Berkeley offi ce. To register online, go to www. goldengateaudubon.org/birdathon. Face Many Challenges A birdathon is like a walkathon, except par- ticipants count bird species instead of miles. Friends, family members, and coworkers support espite the hopes and best efforts of dedicated Golden Gate Audubon vol- you by pledging any amount for each species you D unteers, the number of migrating Western Burrowing Owls that spend identify. Participation in the event automatically winter months in Berkeley’s Cesar Chavez Park continue to decline. Ten years ago, enters you into contests for a chance to win 15 Burrowing Owls were seen in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Garin/Dry Creek Pioneer Regional Parks Staging Area
    80 Suisun Honker er Carquinez S Riv Bay acra nto San Strait Bay Browns me Pablo 160 er San Crockett C Bay Island iv ar Martinez R Bay qu Bay in Pablo in Point u Hills e aq z Shoreline Point Jo Sc n Bay en Sa Pinole ic A D l Waterbird Pittsburg h Pittsburg r 4 a 4 m P i Antioch b Pablo Ave n Antioch r n o Hercules Antioch/Oakley a a Point At l S e Martinez las Rd A 680 d V v R Shoreline Big Pinole d a e le n ll il mo e v ich y y Rancho 242 d s Break R R Sobrante R r Contra Pkw El d ss e Oakley a m t P Rd y Pinole w o A llo s L Sobrante Ridge lham i as S Loma o San br W Concord P ne Gian a r Hw Rd Va ke T 80 nch lley d R Cl ir re Pablo Ra R e a K e ro l yton Rd Knightsen st ie Way Ca z d Kennedy V a n Rd lv ll B e Richmond Grove y yo Brentwood Wildcat Pleasant Briones R v d d v d Hill R Canyon 580 Clayton Black Diamond y Orwood Rd e S l Garrar a l Cutting Blvd n a V d Mines Delta P R r Miller/ Tilden y Mitchell Can M a d le l a e b R Va rs o e l B ek ci h o El ear Cre a C Access n r D Knox A g ee H Y k v Cerrito Castle Rd Point e W a p py V Clayton d ild all y G e lv ca y N r R Rock B Isabel i t o B z d Walnut Ranch Hw C r l z a t t l n Deer n v y h u d yo Brooks P n Creek M G Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks & Recreation Services Municipal Service Review And
    Draft Final Report Parks & Recreation Services Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Updates Prepared for: Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) In association with: Berkson Associates (BA) June 2021 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 Legal Context & LAFCO Policies ................................................................................. 1 Overview of Jurisdictions .......................................................................................... 2 MSR Methodology ................................................................................................... 4 Best Practices ......................................................................................................... 8 Impact of the COVID-19 Global Pandemic ................................................................... 9 Organization of the MSR .......................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 10 2. MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SOI SUMMARY .......................................................... 11 Municipal Service Review Determinations ................................................................. 11 Sphere of Influence Recommendations ..................................................................... 16 3. AMBROSE
    [Show full text]
  • EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements Vision The East Bay Regional Park District will preserve a priceless heritage of natural and cultural resources, open space, parks and trails for the future and will set aside park areas for the enjoyment and healthful recreation for generations to come. An environmental ethic guides us in all that we do. Mission The East Bay Regional Park District will achieve the above vision in the following ways: • Provide a diversified system of regional parklands, trails, and parkland-related services that will offer outstanding opportunities for creative use of outdoor time. • Acquire and preserve significant biologic, geologic, scenic, and historic resources within Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. • Manage, maintain and restore the parklands so that they retain their important scenic, natural, and cultural values. • Interpret the parklands by focusing educational programs on both the visitor’s relationship to nature, natural processes, ecology, history of the parklands, and the value of natural conditions. • Support the development and retention of well-trained, dedicated, and productive employees. • Improve access to and use of the parks by members of groups that have been underrepresented, such as disabled, economically disadvantaged, and elderly visitors. • Balance environmental concerns and outdoor recreational opportunities within regional parklands. • Provide recreational development that fosters appropriate use of parklands while preserving their remoteness and intrinsic value. • Create quality programs that recognize the cultural diversity represented in the region. • Participate in partnerships with public agencies, nonprofit organizations, volunteers, and the private sector to achieve mutual goals. • Provide leadership to help guide land use decisions of East Bay governments that relate to the District.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.4 Biological Resources
    Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Network Master Plan EIR Section 4.4 Biological Resources 4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section addresses biological resources issues related to the proposed MBSST Network project described in Section 2.0, Project Description. A variety of terrestrial and aquatic habitats are present along the three distinct trail reaches (northern, central and Watsonville reaches) of the proposed MBSST Network. The proposed MBSST Network ranges in elevation from sea level to approximately 30 to 40 feet above sea level throughout the corridor. Portions of the proposed project are located within the Coastal Zone of Santa Cruz County. Rincon Consultants, Inc. biologists visited the site on December 3, 11, and 12, 2012 and conducted reconnaissance-level floral and wildlife surveys along the proposed MBSST Network. To support the field investigation, data on biological resources were collected from numerous sources, including relevant literature, maps of natural resources, and data on special- status species and sensitive habitat information obtained from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, formerly the California Department of Fish and Game), California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) (2003; queried August 2012), the California Native Plant Society online Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California (2012), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) (2012b). The USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper (2012a) and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI; 2012c) were also queried. 4.4.1 Setting a. Habitats. The proposed MBSST Network contains 12 habitats mapped by the CDFW California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) habitat classification system (Table 4.4-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Zone a World of Natural Wonders (Both New and Familiar) Awaits Visitors in the East Bay Regional Parks
    SUMMER 2017 Discovery Zone A WORLD OF NATURAL WONDERS (BOTH NEW AND FAMILIAR) AWAITS VISITORS IN THE EaST BaY REGIONAL PARKS IN THIS ISSUE: SPOTLIGht ON CAMPinG P. 4 | CONSERVAtiON EFFORts in the DistRICT P. 6 | PARK SAFetY P. 16 DID YOU PROTECTING OUR ENVIRONMENT The dedication of the Dotson Family Marsh in April KNOW? Fun facts about the celebrated one of the East Bay Regional Park District’s East Bay Regional recent restoration projects and illustrated its ongoing Park District commitment to climate change adaptation. The rise in sea level is just one of the ramifications of climate change, and the Dotson Family Marsh was designed to offset such effects through 2080. The Regional Parks Foundation shares that commitment to protecting our natural resources. One of the Foundation’s core programs, aided by generous Donors, is Environmental Restoration and Habitat Enhancement—helping to keep parklands and wildlife healthy. The creation of the Shorebird Sanctuary at Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline and cleanup efforts at Strawberry Cove and on park trails are a few of the Foundation-supported projects you’ll read about in this issue. Hours spent in the parks are not only about work, of course. There are many areas to explore and breathtaking vistas to revel in for the first (or the 50th) time. Witnessing a new wonder, or sharing 9 a secret spot with a friend, is part of what makes living in this beautiful The minimum age of volunteers and diverse region special. So smell the flowers at the Dry Creek at the Little Farm Garden, say hi to one of EBRPD’s mounted patrol horses—or find your own unique discovery in the parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Dairies Long Term Resource Protection and Access Plan
    COAST DAIRIES LONG-TERM RESOURCE PROTECTION T HE TRUST AND ACCESS PLAN F O R PUBLIC LAND February 2004 COAST DAIRIES LONG-TERM RESOURCE PROTECTION T HE TRUST AND ACCESS PLAN F O R PUBLIC LAND February 2004 Prepared by The Trust for Public Land for the Future Stewards of the Coast Dairies Property 225 Bush Street 8950 Cal Center Drive 710 Second Avenue 2685 Ulmerton Road Suite 1700 Building 3, Suite 300 Suite 730 Suite 102 San Francisco, CA 94104 Sacramento, CA 95826 Seattle, WA 98104 Clearwater, FL 33762 (415) 896-5900 (916) 564-4500 (206) 442-0900 (727) 572-5226 436 14th Street 4221 Wilshire Boulevard 1751 Old Pecos Trail 5850 T.G. Lee Boulevard Suite 600 Suite 480 Suite O Suite 440 Oakland, CA 94612 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Orlando, FL 32822 (510) 839-5066 (323) 933-6111 (505) 992-8860 (407) 851-1155 200071 A READER’S GUIDE TO THE COAST DAIRIES PLAN Coast Dairies Long-term Resource Protection and Access Plan RG-1 been a simple, straight-line trajectory from Swiss-owned dairy and A Reader’s Guide to the Coast farmland to public park. The Coast Dairies Plan is complete and stands by itself as land management guidance, but its future use and Dairies Plan the multiplicity of appendices spawned by the process require some explanation. The Trust for Public Land, in its role as first steward, had responsibilities that stretched backward to the funding entities and The document in your hands is the result of a comprehensive planning forward to the ultimate managers of the land.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S9142
    S9142 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE September 25, 2000 Again, I didn't intend to come to the resources, to authorize the Secretary of the a very important amendment. We cer- floor this afternoon, but nor did I want Army to construct various projects for im- tainly have read a lot about Corps re- to sit and listen to debate which sug- provements to rivers and harbors of the form in the local newspapers, specifi- gests that the minority leader, or the United States, and other purposes. cally the Washington Post, over the Democratic caucus, or anybody else for The PRESIDING OFFICER. There last few months. The stories raised that matter, is at fault for what is tak- will now be 1 hour for closing remarks. very legitimate issues about the eco- Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. ing place. nomic modeling used to justify some of Madam President, I yield myself such As the Senator from West Virginia these water resources projects. indicated, there is perhaps sufficient time as I may consume. However, it is important to under- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- blame to go around. I don't disagree stand that a series of articles in a with that. But I also know that we ator from New Hampshire. Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. newspaper is no substitute for careful didn't win the election. I wish we had. Madam President, this is the first consideration of the facts and of the We don't control the Senate. I wish we major piece of environmental legisla- issues by the Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 References
    5 REFERENCES 5.1 “LAND” REFERENCES Section 3A.1, “Aesthetics – Land” California Department of Transportation. 2008. Scenic Highway Routes: Caltrans Landscape Architecture Program. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/cahisys.htm. Last updated May 19, 2008. Accessed February 18, 2008. City of Folsom. 1993. City of Folsom General Plan. January 1993 update. County of El Dorado. 2004. El Dorado County General Plan. Adopted July 19, 2004. Placerville, CA. U.S. Forest Service. 1974. National Forest Landscape Management. Chapter 1, Volume 2: The Visual Management System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook Number 462. Federal Highway Administration. 1981. Visual Impact Assessment for Highway Projects. Publication Number: FHWA-HI-88-054. Washington, DC. Sacramento County. 1993. Sacramento County General Plan. Adopted December 15, 1993. Sacramento, CA. Section 3A.2, “Air Quality – Land” Anderson, Charles. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Sacramento, CA. September 9, 2009―e-mail correspondence with Joseph Hurley of SMAQMD and Austin Kerr of AECOM regarding the status of the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan. ARB. See California Air Resources Board. ARCADIS. 2007 (November 29). Draft Ambient Air Evaluation of Aerojet Area 40. Petaluma, CA. Letter memorandum from Steve Huntley, to Bruce Cline and David Miller, City of Folsom, Folsom, CA. California Air Resources Board. 1994 (June). California Surface Wind Climatology. Sacramento, CA. ———. 2003. HARP User Guide. Sacramento, CA. Available: http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/harpug.htm. Updated: July 29, 2008. Accessed August 2009. ———. 2005 (March). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Sacramento, CA.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Francisco Presidio and Its Birdlife
    Volume 55, Number 1 September 2009 The San Francisco Presidio and Its Birdlife On September 3, Stephen Phillips will introduce MDAS members to the Presidio of San Francisco, a 1491-acre National Park site that is part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. The Presidio was in continuous use as a military post from 1776 to 1994, spanning the Span- ish, Mexican, and United States periods. On Saturday, October 3, Mount Diablo Audubon will sponsor a birding field trip to this historic site. Stephen is a Biological Science Tech- nician for the Presidio Trust where he is part of the Natural Resources Department performing habitat restoration in the na- tive plant areas. In addition, he is an avid birder having devoured field guides from the age of 10, studied ornithology in college USNPS and, after college, enjoyed two eight-month internships at Santa Ana National Wildlife ation Area and its diversity. Narrowing Dana Gardner is an internationally Refuge in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of the focus, he will discuss the restoration known nature illustrator. He collaborated Texas. There, he documented a breeding (past, present, and future) of the Tennessee with the renowned Central American or- population of Seaside Sparrows in a location Hollow watershed—including specific sites nithologist, Alexander Skutch, for 28 years 190 km south of the known species breed- such as Crissy Marsh, Thompson Reach, and has illustrated many books on Central ing location. Stephen has collected data for and the more recent work at El Polin and South American birds as well as those the Wisconsin Breeding Bird Atlas, been a Springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Up Your Creek! the Electronic Newsletter of the Alameda Creek Alliance
    Up Your Creek! The electronic newsletter of the Alameda Creek Alliance Volunteers Needed for Sunol Wildflower Festival Next Saturday The eleventh annual spring Sunol Wildflower Festival will be held on Saturday April 12, 2014 from 11 am to 4 pm in Sunol Regional Wilderness. There are nine scheduled nature hikes, as well as crafts, music, slideshows and nature activities. The festival is put on by the East Bay Regional Park District, and co-sponsored this year by the Alameda Creek Alliance. We're looking for volunteers to join us at our outreach table at the festival to help promote watershed awareness and appreciation. If you're planning to come to the Wildflower Festival, please consider donating a couple hours of your time to help. Contact Ralph Boniello at [email protected] if you'd like to volunteer, and please specify which of the three shifts you're available for (10 am to noon; noon to 2 pm; or 2 to 4 pm). The early shift will include some set-up and the late shift will include some taking down of materials. Alameda Creek Cleanup April 19 Volunteers needed! Join us for an Earth Day work party as we partner with the Alameda County Resource Conservation District on a creek clean-up and ivy removal at our adopted stretch of Alameda Creek, at the bottom of Niles Canyon. We'll pick up trash from known hotspots along the creek and pull invasive cape ivy that's smothering mature riparian trees at the site. Meet at the Niles Staging Area parking lot, Old Canyon Road near Canyon Oaks Court in Fremont.
    [Show full text]