COAST DAIRIES LONG-TERM RESOURCE PROTECTION T HE TRUST AND ACCESS PLAN F O R PUBLIC LAND February 2004 COAST DAIRIES LONG-TERM RESOURCE PROTECTION T HE TRUST AND ACCESS PLAN F O R PUBLIC LAND February 2004 Prepared by The Trust for Public Land for the Future Stewards of the Coast Dairies Property 225 Bush Street 8950 Cal Center Drive 710 Second Avenue 2685 Ulmerton Road Suite 1700 Building 3, Suite 300 Suite 730 Suite 102 San Francisco, CA 94104 Sacramento, CA 95826 Seattle, WA 98104 Clearwater, FL 33762 (415) 896-5900 (916) 564-4500 (206) 442-0900 (727) 572-5226 436 14th Street 4221 Wilshire Boulevard 1751 Old Pecos Trail 5850 T.G. Lee Boulevard Suite 600 Suite 480 Suite O Suite 440 Oakland, CA 94612 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Santa Fe, NM 87505 Orlando, FL 32822 (510) 839-5066 (323) 933-6111 (505) 992-8860 (407) 851-1155 200071 A READER’S GUIDE TO THE COAST DAIRIES PLAN Coast Dairies Long-term Resource Protection and Access Plan RG-1 been a simple, straight-line trajectory from Swiss-owned dairy and A Reader’s Guide to the Coast farmland to public park. The Coast Dairies Plan is complete and stands by itself as land management guidance, but its future use and Dairies Plan the multiplicity of appendices spawned by the process require some explanation. The Trust for Public Land, in its role as first steward, had responsibilities that stretched backward to the funding entities and The document in your hands is the result of a comprehensive planning forward to the ultimate managers of the land. During the process of effort for the Coast Dairies Property (Property), including many years purchasing the Coast Dairies & Land Co. (CDLC), TPL issued a of citizen interest and involvement, interactions between public request for proposals to locate an entity to accept and care for the agencies and land stewards, intense resource inventory, professional Property. Based on proposals received, two agencies, the California land management planning, and unforeseen changes in the economy Department of Parks and Recreation (Department) and the of the state and the region. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), were chosen in 1999 for ultimate ownership and joint long-term The Coast Dairies Property is located along California’s central coast stewardship of the Property. in northern Santa Cruz County and surrounds the town of Davenport. The approximately 7,000-acre Property consists of 6 distinct In the spring of 2000, a consulting firm, Environmental Science watersheds, more than 7 miles of stunning coastal resources Associates (ESA) of San Francisco, was selected to prepare a plan. (including 7 beaches), hundreds of acres of agricultural lands, 700 This firm, with the assistance of a Steering Committee (the acres of redwood forest, critical habitat for endangered species (coho prospective stewards, TPL, Coastal Conservancy, Save-the- salmon, steelhead, California red-legged frog, and snowy plover), and Redwoods League, and Land Trust of Santa Cruz County) and a other unique natural and cultural resources. Community Advisory Group (CAG), were tasked to develop a Plan that would serve as the blueprint, a kind of constitution that would In 1974, the publication of In the Ocean Wind: The Santa Cruz North establish the basic principles and make manifest the Vision Statement Coast, described the threatened natural beauty of this region and for Coast Dairies. This process has guided the ownership transition to became a call to action for long-term protection. Now with the 2004 BLM and the Department with the kind of transparency demanded by publication of this Coast Dairies Long-term Resource Protection and a concerned and very attentive public. Access Plan (Coast Dairies Plan or Plan), three decades have passed and the land we all know as Coast Dairies is poised to become public Preparation of the Coast Dairies Plan began with an extensive land, protected in perpetuity. examination of the Property’s attributes to assist in planning and land use guidance. The Coast Dairies Existing Conditions Report (ECR) The first chapters of the Coast Dairies Plan, especially Land Use was published in June 2001. Much more detailed than the Plan itself, History, tell the story of the Property’s near brush with becoming the the Existing Conditions Report has been revised several times to stay site of a nuclear power plant or residential development. In keeping current. It formed the most comprehensive reference when the actual with the Property’s complex history, the past five years, during which planning process began. Paper copies of the Coast Dairies Plan the Property was held by the Trust for Public Land (TPL), have not include the ECR as a compact disk in a pocket in the back cover. RG-2 A Reader’s Guide to the Coast Dairies Plan HOW THE COAST DAIRIES PLAN EVOLVED How the Coast Dairies Plan Evolved Second, spring 2002 brought with it new realities of state and federal funding for public land management. In March, both agencies reasserted their intent to steward Coast Dairies as envisioned in the Between June 2001 and the date of this Plan (February 2004) Plan, but acknowledged that it might take some time to secure the planning passed through the normal stages of a document of its type: budgets necessary to do so. At the April 2002 Steering Committee Community Advisory Group and more general public meetings, meeting, the harsh truths were confronted head-on by the Planning regular meetings of the Steering Committee, a “Constraints Analysis” Team. The consultants were instructed to draft a new chapter that (planning jargon for organizing and focusing the Plan), and finally would resolve both problems at the same time: describe a sequence multiple drafts of the Plan itself. On the whole, the Plan follows the of management intensities, from the basic custodial to full Plan logical sequence of extracting the most relevant information from the implementation. This Plan would describe the need to apply CEQA ECR and presenting it in abbreviated form in the Plan, stating and NEPA and incorporate Coast Dairies into the state and federal property-wide goals and standards, and specific direction budget mechanisms. This sequence is described in Chapter VII and (prescriptions) for different watersheds (management zones). as might be expected, went through several drafts before inclusion in the Plan. How BLM and the Department came to Adopt the Plan – Chapter VII and Appendix D The “Draft Final” Coast Dairies Plan was released at the end of June 2003. The public was invited to comment on the draft plan at the The planning process remained on track and close to schedule July 31, 2003 community meeting and to submit comments through through the end of 2001, with extended Steering Committee and CAG August 31, 2003. These comments, as well as notes from the July 31 meetings through the fall and the public presentation of the meeting, are contained in Appendix D. Beyond some updates and a Opportunities and Constraints Analysis in early 2002. Most of the few small errors of fact and lapses of clarity, which have been Planning Team’s assumptions remained intact until spring 2002, but at corrected, this Plan has not been substantially changed from the June that time two of them changed substantially. 2003 Draft. Most of the public comments received express support for certain specific policies. For the most part these actions would be First, it had been assumed by TPL and its consultant, ESA, that the allowed under the Plan, but public comments have called for policy planning process would include analysis of the Plan under the decisions that are more specific than the general level of policy California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National represented by the Plan. So that the public input can guide the Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This would have meant that the agencies as specific policy decisions are made in the future, the Plan would be officially accepted by the Department and BLM at the Planning Team decided that it was preferable to retain all these time the Property was transferred. In March 2002, the Planning Team comments as literally as possible. As an appendix, maintained in the announced to the CAG that, as a non-profit agency, TPL could not project record, the land stewards can exercise their own judgment on prepare the NEPA/CEQA documents because, under law, it could not these comments when they consider the Plan afresh, as part of their be the “lead agency.” Further, BLM and the Department could not CEQA and NEPA deliberations. accept NEPA/CEQA documents on land they didn’t yet own and manage. As a result, it is now envisioned that the long-term Plan will stand alone until it can be legally integrated into the internal planning frameworks of the new land stewards. Coast Dairies Long-term Resource Protection and Access Plan RG-3 HOW THE COAST DAIRIES PLAN EVOLVED Coastal Agriculture, Water Rights, and Anadramous adjacent off-channel impoundment. NOAA Fisheries estimated that Fish – Appendices E and F there could be as many as a thousand young fish, or “fry,” in the off- stream pond. (TPL later contracted with ESA to monitor habitat Coast Dairies continued to be a vibrant working landscape during the conditions in San Vicente Pond through the winter and to measure planning years. Part of Coast Dairies’ authenticity is its ability to and release the coho and steelhead as they migrated out to sea.) combine human uses successfully with unique natural resources. Cattle were grazed, crops raised, beaches were visited. The Sustaining coastal agriculture is one of the primary reasons the Coast extraction of limestone for cement continued to be a thriving business.