DOCSLIB.ORG

CITES Ilegal Trade Report: Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CITES Ilegal Trade Report: Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP13/Inf.7/Annex 4 MIGRATORY 7 November 2019 SPECIES Original: English 13th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Gandhinagar, India, 17 - 22 February 2020 Agenda Item 26.2.6 REPORT ON STATUS, SCOPE AND TRENDS OF THE LEGAL AND ILLEGAL INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN MARINE TURTLES, ITS CONSERVATION IMPACTS, MANAGEMENT OPTIONS AND MITIGATION PRIORITIES – INDONESIA, MALAYSIA AND VIET NAM (Prepared by the Secretariat) ( Summary: CMS Decisions 12.17 Marine Turtles refers to CITES Decision 17.222, which mandates an assessment on marine turtle trade. This CITES assessment was published in June 2019 and is contained in UNEP/CMS/COP13/Inf.7. This document contains the annexed country report on Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam. A rapid assessment on the trade in marine turtles in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam Final Report December 2018 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMNTS TRAFFIC expresses its sincere gratitude to the following for supporting this research: Indonesia • Ronald Lilley • BKSDA (Nature Conservation Agency) in Bali, West Java, East Java, Makassar • Pak Made Kanta, Sarah Melania and Dodi (Bali Turtle Conservation and Education Centre, Serangan Island) • I Wayan Wiradnyana and Pak Agung (Bali Sea Turtle Society) • Harfiandri Damanhuri (Head of the Turtle Inforamation Centre in Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang) • PROFAUNA - Regional offices (Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi) • Dr Mirza D Kusrini (Department of Forest Resources Conservation & Ecotourism Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Agricultural University, West Java) • Dewi Damayanti, Bali • Khalis Dwi (Marine Science Department Padjadjaran University, Bandung, West Java) • Retno Kusuma Ningrum, Bali • Monika Ruwaimana • Daniela B. Cavallini • Maggie Muurmans, Pulau Banyak, North Sumatra • Nur Masyitha Nurdin (Conservation and Biodiversity Analysts of BPSPL Satker Makassar) • Andi Muhammad Ishak Yusma (Head of Program and Evaluation Section of BPSPL Satker Makassa • Mr. Edi and Mrs Mutmainah (BKSDA Makassar) Muhammad Amin (Head Section of 1st Region of GAKKUM (Balai Penegakan Hukum) KLHK Makassar) Malaysia • SEAlutions • Department of Fisheries Malaysia • Sandakan Municipal Council (In-person interview was conducted with the Council’s Head of Enforcement Unit) • WWF Malaysia (Gavin Jolis) • Kudat Turtle Conservation Society • University Malaysia Terengganu researchers Viet Nam • Intelligent Media • Education for Nature-Viet Nam for providing their market survey information for this study • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development • Directorate of Fisheries Glenn Sant, Lauren Lopes, Richard Thomas, Rosa Indenbaum, Sarah Ferguson, Thomasina Oldfield, Christine Hoff, CMS, are thanked for reviewing earlier drafts of the report. Aqeela Abdul Jalil is thanked for developing the graphics and maps used in the report. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 5 1. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY .......................................................................................... 9 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY OF MARINE Turtle TRADE IN THE SOUTHEAST ASIA AND THE CORAL TRIANGLE .................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Marine turtle trade in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam ....................................................... 10 3. POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................. 13 3.1 Global and Regional Frameworks ............................................................................................ 13 3.1.1 Indian Ocean Southeast Asian Marine Turtle Memorandum of Understanding (IOSEA Marine Turtle MoU) ................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Memorandum of Understanding on ASEAN Sea Turtle Conservation and Protection (ASEAN MoU) ............................................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3 Memorandum of Agreement between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of Malaysia on the Establishment of the Turtle Islands Heritage Protected Area (TIHPA MoU) ................................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.4 Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) ............................ 16 3.2 National Legislation ................................................................................................................ 17 3.2.1 Indonesia ....................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Malaysia ........................................................................................................................................ 18 3.2.3 Viet Nam ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4. METHODS .................................................................................................................. 22 4.1 Seizure analysis ...................................................................................................................... 23 4.2 Market surveys ....................................................................................................................... 24 4.3 Online surveys ........................................................................................................................ 27 5. RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 28 5.1 Marine Turtle Seizures ............................................................................................................ 28 5.1.1 Seizure Records and Commodities Seized .................................................................................... 28 5.1.2 Hotspots and Routes ..................................................................................................................... 32 5.2 Physical Market and Online Surveys ....................................................................................... 38 5.2.1 Indonesia ....................................................................................................................................... 38 5.2.2 Malaysia ........................................................................................................................................ 41 5.2.3 Viet Nam ....................................................................................................................................... 42 6. DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................... 44 6.1 Domestic Trade Dynamics ....................................................................................................... 44 6.1.1 Indonesia ....................................................................................................................................... 44 6.1.2 Malaysia ........................................................................................................................................ 48 6.1.3 Viet Nam ....................................................................................................................................... 53 6.2 Legal International Trade Transactions ................................................................................... 54 6.3 Illegal International Trade ....................................................................................................... 57 3 6.3.1 Indonesia ................................................................................................................................ 57 6.3.2 Malaysia ................................................................................................................................. 58 6.3.3 Viet Nam ................................................................................................................................ 59 6.4 Conservation Impact and Management of Marine Turtles ...................................................... 60 6.4.1 Indonesia ....................................................................................................................................... 60 6.4.2 Malaysia ........................................................................................................................................ 61 6.4.3 Viet Nam ....................................................................................................................................... 63 7 CONCLUDING REMARKS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................. 64 7.1 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 65 8 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 68 Annex I: Nesting and Foraging Grounds in Malaysia ........................................................... 72 Annex II: Seizure data and summary for Sabah between 1999 and 2017 ............................. 74 Annex III: List of stakeholders consulted in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam in 2018 ....... 76 Annex IV: Seizure data for Indonesia, Malaysia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 18Th Asian Games Success Story
    18th Asian Games Runs Faultless Secure Network The 2018 Asian Games, held in Jakarta and Palembang, enjoy secure and faultless network performance. Customer: The 18th Asian Games Industry: Sports/Entertainment Location: Jakarta, Indonesia and Palembang, South Sumatera The Challenge – Security On A Large Scale The 18th Asian Games, also known as Jakarta–Palembang 2018, was a multi-sport event held from 18 August to 2 September 2018 in Indonesia. The Asian Games are one of the world’s largest sporting events, held every four years since 1954. More than 16,000 athletes from 45 Asian countries participated in the 2018 Games. For the first time, the Asian Games were co-hosted in two cities; the Indonesian capital of Jakarta, and Palembang, the capital of the South Sumatera province. Preparation for the Games involved building new venues and renovating existing venues across four provinces in Indonesia: Jakarta, South Sumatra, Banten, and West Java. A total of 80 venues were involved, with the main stadium, Gelora Bung Karno, located in Jakarta. The Asian Games are a large-scale international event. The 2018 Games had to cater to many thousands of people—including athletes, spectators, organizers and supporters, from 45 different countries. An incredibly robust video surveillance system, along with many other security measures, was essential for both smooth operation and for the safety and security of everyone present at the Games. The Asia Olympic Committee worked with PT. NEC Indonesia (NEC Indonesia), the ICT security system partner for the 2018 Games. Their goal: to create a smart, safe and highly-efficient environment, by deploying an innovative network infrastructure alongside advanced video surveillance systems.
    [Show full text]
  • How Strong Is the Integrity Disclosure in Indonesian Province Website?
    Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2021, 33-44 Journal of Contemporary Accounting Volume 3 | Issue 1 How strong is the integrity disclosure in Indonesian Province website? Maria Hellenikapoulos Department of Accounting, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia [email protected] Intiyas Utami Department of Accounting, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://journal.uii.ac.id/jca Copyright ©2021 Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Authors. Maria Hellenikapoulos & Intiyas Utami. (2021). How strong is the integrity disclosure in Indonesian Province website? Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 3(1), 33-44 doi:10.20885/jca.vol3.iss1.art4 Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Volume 3, Issue 1, 2021, 33-44 How strong is the integrity disclosure in Indonesian Province website? Maria Hellenikapoulos1*, Intiyas Utami2 1,2Department of Accounting, Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, Indonesia Abstract The high level and trend of corruption in Indonesia Province could hinder the goal of Sustainable Development Goals point 16. This study aims to identify disclosures of integrity through websites and classify the Indonesia Provinces into 3 categories, namely high, medium, and low based on the integrity disclosure index using institutional theory. The data is based on content analysis to analyze practices through disclosure of integrity on 34 Indonesian Province websites using the Integrity Framework Disclosure Index instrument. The findings indicate that Indonesia has disclosed 775 items (48%). The items of vision, mission, and integrity report are the biggest disclosed items among other items that show Indonesia’s effort to create a “good image” in the public eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTING in NATURE for DEVELOPMENT: Do Nature-Based Interventions Deliver Local Development Outcomes? Photo Credits
    INVESTING IN NATURE FOR DEVELOPMENT: do nature-based interventions deliver local development outcomes? Photo credits: Cover — JB Russell/Panos Pictures Fishermen cast their nets at sunrise in mangrove wetlands, Guinea Bissau. Traditional livelihoods in this region are being negatively impacted by ecosystem destruction from climate change and human activity. Inside pages: Page 8 — Diana Robinson via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 10 — Tomas Munita, CIFOR, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 12 — Rifky, CIFOR, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 16 — Devi Puspita Amartha Yahya via Unsplash Page 18 — Ajay Rastogi Page 19 — Axel Fassio, CIFOR, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 24 — Seyiram Kweku via Unsplash Page 29 — Ree Dexter via Flickr, CC BY 2.0 Page 31 — Hampus Eriksson, WorldFish, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 35 — Mike Lusmore/Duckrabbit, WorldFish, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 36 — psyren via Flickr, CC BY-NC 2.0 Page 50 — Carsten ten Brink via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 51 — David Mills, WorldFish, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 52 — Nazmulhuqrussell via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0 Page 55 — Dante Aguiar via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0 Page 57 — Aulia Erlangga, CIFOR, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Page 58 — Anna Fawcus, WorldFish, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 INVESTING IN NATURE FOR DEVELOPMENT: do nature-based interventions deliver local development outcomes? This report was compiled in collaboration with the Nature-Based Solutions Initiative (NbSI) at the University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Raw Materials in India and Indonesia Market Study and Potential Analysis | Final Report May 2021 Imprint
    Construction Raw Materials in India and Indonesia Market Study and Potential Analysis | Final Report May 2021 Imprint PUBLISHED BY Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR) Stilleweg 2 30655 Hannover (Germany) Copyright © 2021 by Levin Sources and the Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) All rights reserved under International Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. ABOUT THIS REPORT This report presents the final results of a study on construction raw material value chains in two metropolitan areas in India and Indonesia. This study is a product of BGR’s sector project “Extractives and Development”, which is implemented on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). The set up and the implementation of the study have been coordinated and accompanied by Hannah Maul. For more information please visit: www.bmz.de/rue/en AUTHORS This report was written by Victoria Gronwald, Nicolas Eslava, Olivia Lyster, Nayan Mitra and Vovia Witni, with research contributions from teams in Indonesia and India. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared from sources and data Levin Sources believes to be reliable at the time of writing, but Levin Sources makes no representation as to its accuracy or completeness. The report is provided for in- formational purposes and is not to be construed as providing endorsements, representations or warranties of any kind whatsoever. The authors accept no liability for any consequences whatsoever of pursuing any of the recommendations provided in this report, either singularly or altogether.
    [Show full text]
  • &Green Jurisdictional Eligibility Criteria Assessment for the Republic of Indonesia
    &GREEN JURISDICTIONAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA March 2020 Prepared for: &GREEN FUND PRINS BERNHARDPLEIN 200, 1097JB AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS PT Hatfield Indonesia Plaza Harmoni Unit B5-B7 Jl. Siliwangi No.46 Bogor 16131 Indonesia &GREEN JURISDICTIONAL ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Prepared for: &GREEN FUND PRINS BERNHARDPLEIN 200 1097JB AMSTERDAM NETHERLANDS Prepared by: PT HATFIELD INDONESIA PLAZA HARMONI UNITS B5-B7 JL. SILIWANGI NO.46 BOGOR 16131 INDONESIA MARCH 2020 AGRN10116-BG VERSION 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................II LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................................................II LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................III DISTRIBUTION LIST ..................................................................................... VII AMENDMENT RECORD ............................................................................... VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1 HIGH LEVEL OF SUMMARY .................................................................1 JURISDICTIONAL SCOPE .....................................................................4 3.1 BACKGROUND: KEY ECONOMIC DATA AND MAPS ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Food, Nutrition and the Environment in Indonesia a Perspective on Sustainable Food Systems
    June 2021 DOI: 10.17528/cifor/008070 Linking food, nutrition and the environment in Indonesia A perspective on sustainable food systems Mulia Nurhasan1,2, Yusuf Bahtimi Samsudin1, John F McCarthy3, Lucentezza Napitupulu4, Rosita Dewi5, Dian N Hadihardjono6, Aser Rouw7, Kuntum Melati8, William Bellotti9, Rodri Tanoto10, Stuart J Campbell11, Desy Leo Ariesta1, M Hariyadi Setiawan12, Ali Khomsan13 and Amy Ickowitz1 Highlights • This brief reviews the interlinkages between food, nutrition and the environment in Indonesia, and the role of national food policies in addressing the challenges in these sectors. • While Indonesia is a mega-biodiverse country, nationally supported agricultural production programs tend to focus on a few high-value commodities, contributing to low dietary diversity. • Lessons from past food estate programs suggest that food system interventions that focus heavily on increasing monocropping, especially rice production, overlook the capacity of local people to develop their own food systems, while failing to provide healthy diets, and damaging the environment. • To move towards sustainable food systems, we argue that policies need to: focus on delivering healthy and diverse diets; support local food production practices that are environmentally sustainable; embrace local cultures and values; re-evaluate centralized and top-down policies; and avoid overly focusing on production of rice. • Policies that decentralize and localize food production can enhance resilience and the sustainability of food systems. 1 Center for
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Asia-Pacific Statistics Week Leaving No One and Nowhere Behind
    Virtual Event 15-18 June 2020 2020 Asia-Pacific Statistics Week Leaving no one and nowhere behind The Use of Mobile Positioning data to Measure Visitors of a Multisport Events: A Case study of ASIAN Games 2018 in Indonesia Action Area C. Methodological approaches to integrated analysis (SC1) Use of sound methodologies Authors: Amalia A. Widyasanti, Alfatihah Reno, Siim Esko, Margus Tiru, Titi Kanti Lestari Ministry of Planning, BPS-Statistics Indonesia, Positium LBS Present by: Amalia A. Widyasanti/Titi Kanti Lestari #apstatsweek2020 #apstatsweek2020 Event Analysis ASIAN GAMES Virtual Event 15-18 June 2020 2020 Asia-Pacific Statistics Week Leaving no one and nowhere behind Background • Tourism has explicitly mentioned as targets in Goal 8 (8.9.1 and 8.9.2). • In Indonesia, NSO (Statistics Indonesia collected and published the data regularly (Monthly and Annually) • There are data gaps, in terms of coverage, granularity (sub-national), timeliness • The data sources for inbound, domestic and outbound tourism are from immigration data, MPD, digital survey, and CAPI. #apstatsweek2020 Virtual Event 15-18 June 2020 2020 Asia-Pacific Statistics Week Leaving no one and nowhere behind Background • Indonesia hosted ASIAN Games in 2018, which was the second time after hosting it in 1962. • This multi sport event is hopefully could increase tourism and gave positive impact to the Indonesian economy and especially to regional/provincial economy in both short and long term. • The economic impact is analysed using Computable General Equlibrium (CGE) model #apstatsweek2020 Virtual Event 15-18 June 2020 2020 Asia-Pacific Statistics Week Leaving no one and nowhere behind Research Objectives The objective of this study is to analyze the mobility of people visiting the Asian Games 2018 in Jakarta and Palembang.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era in EU-China Relations: More Wide- Ranging Strategic Cooperation?
    STUDY A new era in EU-China relations: more wide- ranging strategic cooperation? Policy Department for External Relations Author: Anna SAARELA EN Directorate General for External Policies of the Union DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY A new era in EU-China relations: more wide- ranging strategic cooperation? Author: Anna SAARELA ABSTRACT China is an important strategic partner for the EU, despite fundamental divergences in some areas, mostly related to state intervention and fundamental human rights. The partnership offers mutually beneficial cooperation and dialogue in areas ranging from investment and transport to human rights and cybersecurity. China is navigating in new directions, guided by Xi Jinping's 'Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era’. Despite President Xi’s repeated avowals that 'the market will have a decisive role', public ownership remains the mainstay of the Chinese economy, whereas profound reforms would be needed to tackle the root causes of overcapacity in various industrial sectors. Xi's ‘Belt and Road Initiative’, now also included in the Constitution, is the flagship international connectivity and infrastructure programme dominated by Chinese state-owned companies. Overall, China’s crucial, but complex transition towards more sustainable growth would eventually benefit both, China and the world as a whole. Global economic interdependence, however, makes certain spill-over effects of China’s rebalancing unavoidable. China plays a pivotal role in global governance and the rules-based international order, and this comes with responsibilities. Beijing has begun to shift away from the narrow pursuit of national aims towards a more assertive foreign and security policy, and increased financial, economic and security cooperation with a global outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Sector
    Energy Transition in Support of the Low-Carbon Development Initiative in Indonesia Transport Sector REPORT Tara Laan Neil McCulloch October 2019 © 2019 International Institute for Sustainable Development | IISD.org/gsi Energy Transition in Support of the Low-Carbon Development Initiative in Indonesia: Transport Sector © 2019 The International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development. International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an Head Office independent think tank championing sustainable solutions to 21st– 111 Lombard Avenue, Suite 325 century problems. Our mission is to promote human development and Winnipeg, Manitoba environmental sustainability. We do this through research, analysis and Canada R3B 0T4 knowledge products that support sound policy-making. Our big-picture view allows us to address the root causes of some of the greatest challenges Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 facing our planet today: ecological destruction, social exclusion, unfair laws Website: www.iisd.org and economic rules, a changing climate. IISD’s staff of over 120 people, Twitter: @IISD_news plus over 50 associates and 100 consultants, come from across the globe and from many disciplines. Our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries. Part scientist, part strategist—IISD delivers the knowledge to act. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c) (3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations, the private sector and individuals. About GSI The IISD Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) supports international Global Subsidies Initiative processes, national governments and civil society organizations to align International Environment House 2, subsidies with sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the REDD+ Experience in Indonesia Lessons from National, Subnational and Local Implementation
    CIFOR infobriefs provide concise, accurate, peer-reviewed information on current topics in forest research No. 314, December 2020 DOI: 10.17528/cifor/007880 | cifor.org Revisiting the REDD+ experience in Indonesia Lessons from national, subnational and local implementation Sandy Nofyanza, Moira Moeliono, Vivi Selviana, Bimo Dwisatrio, Nining Liswanti, Ade Ryane Tamara and Mella Komalasari Key messages • In Indonesia, early involvement and support for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) has led to numerous achievements, but progress has been slower than anticipated. • National and subnational REDD+ initiatives are susceptible to political turnover at each election cycle. To ensure its longevity, REDD+ needs to be embedded in national and regional laws, regulations, institutions and other state devices. • REDD+ institutionalization in Indonesia has focused on technicalities rather than on directly addressing socioeconomic and political drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. The rate of deforestation has decelerated enough to result in two REDD+ payments. However, transformational change in the forestry and broader land-use sector has not progressed far enough. • REDD+ is inherently multilevel and multisectoral. However, much information, action, knowledge exchange and decision making on REDD+ is concentrated within relatively few organizations. Transformational change requires that other stakeholders and sectors that impact forests get involved. Introduction announced that Indonesia would receive, as its first results-based REDD+ payment, USD 56 million for In this brief we aim to highlight several lessons from the reducing 4.8 MtCO2 emissions in 2017 against the experience of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation 2006–2016 historical baseline (Seymour, 2019). More and forest Degradation (REDD+) in Indonesia and recently, Indonesia received another performance- explore relevant opportunities for future forest-based based payment – USD 103 million from the Green climate mitigation and adaptation initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Mobile Positioning Data to Measure Visitors of a Multisport Events: a Case Study of ASIAN Games 2018 in Indonesia1
    2020 Asia–Pacific Statistics Week A decade of action for the 2030 Agenda: Statistics that leaves no one and nowhere behind 15 -19 JUNE 2020 | Bangkok, Thailand The Use of Mobile Positioning data to Measure Visitors of a Multisport Events: A Case study of ASIAN Games 2018 in Indonesia1 Amalia A. Widyasanti; Alfatihah Reno; Siim Esko; Margus Tiru; Titi Kanti Lestari Ministry of Development Planning, BPS-Statistics Indonesia, Positium LBS Abstract: Indonesia hosted ASIAN Games in 2018, which was the second time after its hosting in 1962. This paper will present the the methodology of measuring visitors to an event as well as their mobility using mobile positioning data. The data is then used as one of data input for economic impact analysis of the multi sport event. Mobile phone data is used since the immigration data can not give the accurate data people visiting the event, while survey need more time and resources and ticket sales also need time to produce and it can not show the mobility of the people before and after the event nor the origin of visitors. Mobile positioning data is used to analyse the mobility of people visiting the Asian Games 2018 in Jakarta and Palembang. The mobility analysis covers number of people by their originated countries or provinces, their movement during the games period, as well as their interests. The mobility data was then submitted as data inputs for further economic analysis using Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model, as for policy recommendation aligned with the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. Keywords: Big data analysis, mobile phone data, multisport impact analysis, computable general equilibrium.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Thyroid Hormone Levels Between Women Farmers and Non-Farmers in Banten Indonesia
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Comparison of Thyroid Hormone Levels between Women Farmers and Non-Farmers in Banten Indonesia Dian Mardhiyah 1,*, Wan Nedra Komaruddin 2, Fasli Nedra Jalal 3, Sri Wuryanti 3, Syukrini Bahri 4, Qomariah Qomariah 5, Insan Sosiawan 5, Himmi Marsiati 5, Legiono Legiono 5, Harliansyah Hanif 6, Susan Woskie 7 and Pornpimol Kongtip 8 1 Department of Public Health, YARSI University, Jakarta 10510, Indonesia 2 Department of Pediatric, YARSI University, Jakarta 10510, Indonesia; [email protected] 3 Department of Nutrition, YARSI University, Jakarta 10510, Indonesia; [email protected] (F.N.J.); [email protected] (S.W.) 4 Department of Clinical Pathology, YARSI University, Jakarta 10510, Indonesia; [email protected] 5 Department of Physiology, YARSI University, Jakarta 10510, Indonesia; [email protected] (Q.Q.); [email protected] (I.S.); [email protected] (H.M.); [email protected] (L.L.) 6 Department of Biomedical Science, YARSI University, Jakarta 10510, Indonesia; [email protected] 7 Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA; [email protected] 8 Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +62-(21)4206675 Abstract: Pesticides are suspected of being endocrine disruptors. This cross-sectional study mea- Citation: Mardhiyah, D.; sured serum samples for levels of thyroid hormones including thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), Komaruddin, W.N.; Jalal, F.N.; triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), free T3 (FT3), and free T4 (FT4) among Indonesian female Wuryanti, S.; Bahri, S.; Qomariah, Q.; farmers (n = 127) and non-farmers (n = 127).
    [Show full text]