DOCSLIB.ORG

Moving Litigation from Dispute Resolution to Conflict Management, Problem Solving and Building Organisation CHAPTER 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moving Litigation from Dispute Resolution to Conflict Management, Problem Solving and Building Organisation CHAPTER 1 Moving Litigation from Dispute Resolution to Conflict Management, Problem Solving and Building Organisation CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF THESIS ......................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Legal process literature overview .................................................................................... 8 1.3 Process reform for substantive transformation ............................................................. 14 1.4 Choice ........................................................................................................................... 20 1.5 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 20 CHAPTER 2: BARNARD: WHO’S CONSTITUTION IS IT ANYWAY? ........................... 25 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 25 2.2 Paradox of predictability ......................................................................................... 27 2.3 Choices inducing unpredictability ........................................................................... 30 2.4 Form and substance .............................................................................................. 32 2.5 Why Barnard? ........................................................................................................ 35 2.6 Structure ................................................................................................................. 41 2.7 Part A: Possibilities for predictability? ................................................................... 43 2.7.1 Objective and subjective influences on litigation .................................................... 44 2.7.1.1 Objective conditions ........................................................................................... 45 2.7.1.1.1 State of politics and the constitutional project ............................................... 45 2.7.1.1.2 Foundations of the economy ......................................................................... 49 2.7.2. Subjective conditions: legal, political and constitutional culture and consciousness. .................................................................................................................... 57 2.7.2.2.1 Distinguishing Culture and Consciousness ................................................... 60 2.7.2.2.2 Legal Culture and Consciousness ................................................................. 62 2.7.2.2.3 Consciousness, culture and unarticulated phenomena ................................ 73 2.7.2.2.4 Political Culture .............................................................................................. 78 2.7.2.2.5 Constitutional Culture .................................................................................... 84 2.7.3 Legal Theories ................................................................................................... 93 2.7.3.1 CLR .................................................................................................................... 94 2.7.3.2 Agonism and jurisgenerative constitutionalism .................................................. 95 2.7.3.3 Experimentalism ................................................................................................ 98 2.7.3.4 Positive vs Normative approach ...................................................................... 100 2.7.4 Unarticulated Factors and Phenomena................................................................ 103 2.7.4.1 Articulating the unarticulated ........................................................................... 103 2.7.4.2 Marital status: unarticulated patriarchy, economics or something else? ......... 105 2.7.5 Causes of unarticulated phenomena ................................................................... 123 2.4.5.1 Ideology ........................................................................................................... 124 2.7.5.2 Defaulting to Binaries ....................................................................................... 150 2.7.5.3 The Judicial Function ....................................................................................... 161 2.7.5.3.1 Trial judge .................................................................................................... 163 2.7.5.3.2 Panel judges ............................................................................................... 167 2.7.5.4 Judges are Human ........................................................................................... 176 2.7.6 Judicial Analytics .............................................................................................. 184 2.5 Part B: Barnard ....................................................................................................... 187 2.8.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 187 2.8.2 Ideological dispositions ........................................................................................ 192 2.8.3 A few more facts................................................................................................... 199 2.8.4 Exposing Ms Barnard’s ambiguity ........................................................................ 201 2.8.5 Exposing SAPS’s ambiguity ................................................................................. 207 2.8.6 Exposing inefficiencies ......................................................................................... 209 2 2.8.6.1 Administration compromised ........................................................................... 209 2.8.6.2 Litigants’ failure to follow due process ............................................................. 212 2.8.6.3 Quality of evidence compromised .................................................................... 214 2.8.6.4 Dispute system design (DSD) sacrificed ......................................................... 216 2.8.6.4.1 Processing the Grievance ........................................................................... 221 2.8.6.4.2 At mediation ................................................................................................. 224 2.8.6.4.3 How the legal actors responded .................................................................. 225 2.8.6.5 Collateral Damage ........................................................................................... 229 2.8.6.5.1 Rules of evidence undermined .................................................................... 230 2.8.6.5.2 Evidential deficits – a gateway for deference .............................................. 232 2.8.6.5.3 Deference trumped precedent ..................................................................... 234 2.8.6.5.4 Deference triggered process choices .......................................................... 237 2.8.6.5.5 Deference trumped dialogical constitutionalism .......................................... 240 2.8.6.5.6 Deference trumped reconciliation ................................................................ 241 2.8.7 Unarticulated Factors and Phenomena? ............................................................. 243 2.8.7.1 CC: Cameron J’s conundrum .......................................................................... 243 2.8.7.2 SCA: Unarticulated and unidentifiable phenomena? ....................................... 247 2.8.8 Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 255 CHAPTER 3. WHY CARE ABOUT LITIGATION? ...................................................... 258 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 258 3.2. Choice ........................................................................................................................ 260 3.3 Complexity ................................................................................................................... 263 3.3.1 Interest or rights disputes ..................................................................................... 266 3.3.2 Public or private.................................................................................................... 276 3.3.3 National or international ....................................................................................... 277 3.4 Polycentricity ........................................................................................................ 278 3.5 Separation of powers ........................................................................................... 280 3.6 Context. ....................................................................................................................... 290 3.7 Bulwark ........................................................................................................................ 305 3.8 Form and substance ................................................................................................... 310 3.9 Dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 317 3.10 Participation ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • April 2021 DGRU Report V1
    SUBMISSION AND RESEARCH REPORT ON THE JUDICIAL RECORDS OF NOMINEES FOR THE JSC SITTING IN APRIL 2021 VOLUME 1: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL 1 INDEX TO VOLUME 1 OF THE REPORT PAGE NUMBER Submission and Methodology 3 Research report COURT CANDIDATE Advocate Alan Dodson SC 12 Judge Fayeeza Kathree- 21 Setiloane Judge Jody Kollapen 31 Deputy Judge President 41 Aubrey Ledwaba Constitutional Court Justice Rammaka Mathopo 50 Judge Shenaaz Meer 58 Justice Mahube Molemela 66 Judge Dhaya Pillay 74 Judge David Unterhalter 83 Judge Bashier Vally 92 Judge Zeenat Carelse 100 Judge Jannie Eksteen 108 Judge Trevor Gorven 116 Judge Wendy Hughes 125 Judge Pete Koen 133 Supreme Court of Appeal Deputy Judge President [See page 41 Aubrey Ledwaba above] Judge Nolwazi Mabindla- 141 Boqwana Judge Elias Matojane 149 Judge Selewe Mothle 156 Judge Owen Rogers 164 Judge Sharise Weiner 173 2 INTRODUCTION 1. The Democratic Governance and Rights Unit (“DGRU”) is an applied research unit based in the Department of Public Law at the University of Cape Town. DGRU’s vision is of a socially just Africa, where equality and constitutional democracy are upheld by progressive and accountable legal systems, enforced by independent and transformative judiciaries, anchored by a strong rule of law. The mission of the DGRU is to advance social justice and constitutional democracy in Africa by conducting applied and comparative research; supporting the development of an independent, accountable and progressive judiciary; promoting gender equality and diversity in the judiciary and in the legal profession; providing free access to law; and enabling scholarship, advocacy and online access to legal information.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa
    <*x>&&<>Q&$>ee$>Q4><><>&&i<>4><><i^^ South Africa UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA HE political tension of the previous three years in the Union of South TAfrica (see articles on South Africa in the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, Vols. 51, 52 and 53) broke, during the period under review, into a major constitutional crisis. A struggle began between the legislature and the judi- ciary over the "entrenched clauses" of the South Africa Act, which estab- lished the Union, and over the validity of a law passed last year by Daniel Francois Malan's Nationalist Government to restrict the franchise of "Col- ored" voters in Cape Province in contravention of these provisions. Simul- taneously, non-European (nonwhite) representative bodies started a passive resistance campaign against racially discriminatory legislation enacted by the present and previous South African governments. Resulting unsettled condi- tions in the country combined with world-wide economic trends to produce signs of economic contraction in the Union. The developing political and racial crisis brought foreign correspondents to report at first hand upon conditions in South Africa. Not all their reports were objective: some were characterized by exaggeration and distortion, and some by incorrect data. This applied particularly to charges of Nationalist anti-Semitism made in some reports. E. J. Horwitz, chairman of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (central representative body of South Afri- can Jewry) in an interview published in Die Transvaler of May 16, 1952, specifically refuted as "devoid of all truth" allegations of such anti-Semitism, made on May 5, 1952, in the American news magazine Time.
    [Show full text]
  • Confict Resolution
    AFRICAN JOURNAL ON CONFLICT RESOLUTION Volume 16, Number 2, 2016 Efficacy of top-down approaches to post-conflict social coexistence and community building: Experiences from Zimbabwe ‘There’s no thing as a whole story’: Storytelling and the healing of sexual violence survivors among women and girls in Acholiland, northern Uganda Volume 16, Number 2, 2016 Number 2, 2016 16, Volume Competing orders and conflicts at the margins of the State: Inter-group conflicts along the Ethiopia-Kenya border Indigenous institutions as an alternative conflict resolution mechanism in eastern Ethiopia: The case of the Ittu Oromo and Issa Somali clans African Journal on Conflict Resolution Volume 16, Number 2, 2016 The African Journal on Conflict Resolution is a peer-reviewed journal published by the African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD) for the multidisciplinary subject field of conflict resolution. There are two regular issues per year, and occasionally also a special issue on a particular theme. It appears on the list of journals accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training. ACCORD is a non-governmental, non-aligned conflict resolution organisation based in Durban, South Africa. ACCORD is constituted as an education trust. The journal seeks to publish articles and book reviews on subjects relating to conflict, its management and resolution, as well as peacemaking, peacekeeping and peacebuilding in Africa. It aims to be a conduit between theory and practice. Views expressed in this journal are not necessarily those of ACCORD. While every attempt is made to ensure that the information published here is accurate, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage that may arise out of the reliance of any person upon any of the information this journal contains.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining and Distributive Struggles in South Africa
    PROPERTY RIGHTS FROM ABOVE AND BELOW: MINING AND DISTRIBUTIVE STRUGGLES IN SOUTH AFRICA A report by the at the University of Texas at Austin December 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements iv List of Acronyms v Executive Summary vi Introduction 1 Part 1: Inequality and Rights in South Africa 7 Human Rights, Transformative Constitutionalism and Persistent Inequality 7 Property, Rights and Transformation 8 Part 2: Background – Mining in South Africa 13 The Mining Industry in South Africa 13 History of Mining in South Africa 15 The Minerals Act of 1991 19 Imperatives for Transformation of the Mining Sector 19 Part 3: The 2002 Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 24 Changes in Mineral Rights under the MPRDA 26 Black Economic Empowerment in the MPRDA 27 Consultation under the MPRDA 30 Social and Labor Plans (SLPs) 31 Revenue Distribution 33 Part 4: Constitutional Contestation — Property and Human Rights 34 Facts of the Case 34 Human Rights Arguments 34 AgriSA I to III: North Gauteng High Court and Supreme Court of Appeal 35 AgriSA IV: Constitutional Court 35 Part 5: International Contestation - Property and Human Rights 39 Background to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) 39 BITs and the Negotiation of the MPRDA 40 The Piero Foresti Arbitration 40 Human Rights Engagement 42 Outcomes of the Arbitration 42 Reflections and Analysis of the Arbitration 43 Policy Responses to the Arbitration 46 The Ongoing Legacy of Piero Foresti 47 Conclusion 50 Part 6: Property Rights “from Below” 52 ii The Richtersveld Cases 53 Tensions of Customary Law in South Africa 54 Community Resistance to Mining at Xolobeni 55 Legal Proceedings 58 Conclusion 63 iii AUTHORSHIP AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was primarily authored by Julia Dehm, Lecturer, La Trobe Law School, Melbourne, Australia, who was a post-doctoral fellow at the Rapoport Center for Human Rights and Justice from 2015-17.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE of RACE RELATIONS 79Th ANNUAL
    SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS 79th ANNUAL REPORT 1st JANUARY TO 31st DECEMBER 2008 PUBLISHED BY THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS, 9th FLOOR, RENAISSANCE CENTRE, GANDHI SQUARE, 16–20 NEW STREET SOUTH, JOHANNESBURG, 2001 SOUTH AFRICA COMPANY REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1937/010068/08 NON-PROFIT REGISTRATION NUMBER: 000-709-NPO PUBLIC BENEFIT ORGANISATION NUMBER: 930006115 Private Bag X13, Marshalltown, 2107 South Africa Telephone: (011) 492-0600 Telefax: (011) 492-0588 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.sairr.org.za ISBN 978-1-86982-580-5 PD 11/2009 Printed by Ince (Pty) Ltd Cover design by lime design Our front cover, using a photograph from the Sunday Times (photogra - pher James Oatway), depicts the chief justice, Judge Pius Nkonzo Langa, administering the oath of office to President Jacob Zuma dur - ing his inauguration at the Union Buildings in Pretoria on 9th May 2009. The back cover features Mrs Helen Suzman taken in 1990 in her study at home. The photograph is from Gallo Images (South Photographs). COUNCIL President : Professor Jonathan Jansen Immediate Past President : Professor Sipho Seepe Vice Presidents : Professor Hermann Giliomee Professor Lawrence Schlemmer Dr Musa Shezi Chairman of the Board of Directors : Professor Charles Simkins Honorary Treasurer : Mr Brian Hawksworth Honorary Legal Adviser : Mr Derek Bostock Representatives of Members: Honorary Life : Mr Benjy Donaldson Professor Elwyn Jenkins Individual Gauteng : Mr Francis Antonie Mr Jack Bloom MPL Professor Tshepo Gugushe Mr Peter Joubert
    [Show full text]
  • Historia Volume 26 #2
    ll9 JEWISH IMMIGRATION AS AN ISSUE IN SOUTH AFRICAN POLITICS, 1937-39 G.C. Cuthbertson University of So.uth Africa The Aliens Act, 1937 Richard Stuttaford, as Minister of the Interior in the Fusion Cabinet (United Party Government) in 1937, inherited the problem of growing Anti-Semitism which had found sanctuary within the Purified Nationalist Party of Dr D F Malan and had resulted from the influx of Jews from Europe into South Africa in the wake of the repressive racialism of the Nazi Fuehrer, in 1930. Owing to the relatively large im- migration from eastern Europe, mainly of Jews, the Quota Bill was piloted through parliament by Dr D F Malan, Minister of the Interior, at the time. The Bill set a limit to the number of immigrants permitted to enter the Union from eastern Europe, but for the rest, the door remained open. Though the Quota Bill did not specifically men- tionJews, it could not be denied that it was directed against them,l and it was for that reason thatJan Smuts, heading the South African Party, led his reluctant followers in- to opposition against the Bill. The Quota Act achieved its purpose, but when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 a new situation developed, and a mass emigration ensued. In these cir- cumstances there was a considerable increase in the number of Jewish immigrants into the Union after 1933. Between 1933 and 1936,9 947 German immigrants entered the Union, and of these, 3 615 were Jews. By 1936 the Jewish community constituted 4,75% of South Africa's European population.2 During the latter half of 1936 there was mounting agitation in the Union for the restriction of Jewish immigration, con- siderably aggravated by anti-Jewish immigration campaigns organised by the Greyshirt movement and the Malanites.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Digital De Direito Administrativo
    REVISTA DIGITAL DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO FACULDADE DE DIREITO DE RIBEIRÃO PRETO – FDRP UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO – USP Seção: Artigos Científicos O caso Simelane: o controle judicial dos atos de nomeação expedidos pelo Chefe do Poder Executivo, à luz do critério das considerações relevantes e do princípio da racionalidade The Simelane Case: The judicial review of the acts of appointment issued by the head of the executive branch, in light of relevant considerations and the principle of rationality Hidemberg Alves da Frota Resumo: Este artigo pretende difundir subsídios teóricos hauridos do julgamento do processo judicial Democratic Alliance v. President of South Africa and Others (caso Simelane). Analisam-se as peculiaridades desse caso concreto, os principais argumentos esposados pela Suprema Corte de Apelação e pela Corte Constitucional da África do Sul, o posicionamento da doutrina sul-africana, o contexto subjacente do Direito Administrativo e do Direito Constitucional sul-africanos contem- porâneos e o seu diálogo com o Direito Administrativo Comparado e com a história do Direito sul- africano. Ao fim, inspira-se em tal julgado para propor a adoção do princípio da racionalidade e do critério das considerações relevantes como balizas para o controle, pelo Poder Judiciário brasileiro, de nomeações que consubstanciam atos de natureza político-governamental ou análoga. Palavras-chave: caso Simelane; racionalidade; considerações relevantes; atos de nomeação; atos político-governamentais; controle judicial do Poder Executivo. Abstract: This article aims to inform the portuguese-speaking legal community about the theoretical underpinnings that were drawn from the trial of Democratic Alliance v President of South Africa and Others (the Simelane case). The peculiarities of this case are examined, and the main arguments upheld by the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court of South Africa are analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Smuts and the Ideological Foundations of the United Nations
    HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY “To Save Succeeding Generations from the Scourge of War”: Jan Smuts and the Ideological Foundations of the United Nations Christof Heyns* & Willem Gravett** ABSTRACT The story of the founding of the United Nations reflects its complicated ideological foundations. Jan Smuts, who wrote the words “human rights” into the Charter, was also the premier of white-ruled South Africa. Smuts embodies the dualism that runs through international law itself: the pursuit of the common good is invariably tied to its own interest. It was only through the interventions of the emerging global community, and in particular the developing world—and consequently the repudiation of Smuts and the apartheid policies of his successors —that human rights attained a more universal nature. Human rights have deeper, but also darker, roots than many current accounts would have it. I. INTRODUCTION An under-explored case study in understanding the complex foundations of human rights and international law is the visionary and controversial South African, Jan Christian Smuts. A principal author of the Covenant of the League of Nations, and the person directly responsible for the recognition * Christof Heyns is Professor of Human Rights Law and Director of the Institute for International and Comparative Law in Africa, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria. ** Willem Gravett is a Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria. We would like to thank Saul Dubow, John Dugard, Christopher McCrudden, Bill Schwarz, and Richard Steyn for comments on earlier drafts. Charles Comley has been a constant source of information. Human Rights Quarterly 39 (2017) 574–605 © 2017 by Johns Hopkins University Press 2017 Jan Smuts and the Ideological Foundations of the United Nations 575 of human rights as a founding value in the Charter of the United Nations, he was also the premier of white-ruled South Africa, which would become infamous under his successors as the apartheid state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges of Transitioning from Opposition to Governing Party: the Case Study of the Democratic Alliance in South Africa'
    The challenges of transitioning from opposition to governing party: The case study of the Democratic Alliance in South Africa’s Western Cape Province. Sandile Mnikati (214582906) This Dissertation is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Social Science in Political Science at the School of Social Sciences, College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor: Dr. Khondlo Mtshali Co-supervisor: Mr Sandile Mnguni i DECLARATION I Sandile Mnikati declare that: 1. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated,is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons· data, pictures, graphs or other infom1ation, unless specifically acknowledged asbeing sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain another persons' writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. \1/hereother written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written, but the general information attributed to them has been referenced b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed in inside quotation marks and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphicsor tables copied and pasted from the Internet. unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the Thesis and in rhe References sections. _Mnikati.S_ Student Name Sign,Ullre. , % Date 2020/05/09 Mtshali, K Supervisor Mnguni.S Co-Supervisor ii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to all the members of the Mnikathi and Wallett family, you have been a pillar of strength throughout this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the South African Reich
    The Rise of the South African Reich http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.crp3b10036 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org The Rise of the South African Reich Author/Creator Bunting, Brian; Segal, Ronald Publisher Penguin Books Date 1964 Resource type Books Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa, Germany Source Northwestern University Libraries, Melville J. Herskovits Library of African Studies, 960.5P398v.12cop.2 Rights By kind permission of Brian P. Bunting. Description "This book is an analysis of the drift towards Fascism of the white government of the South African Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • “South Africa's 800” by Henry Katzew
    SOUTH AFRICA’S 800 The Story of South African Volunteers in Israel’s War of Birth by Henry Katzew Compiled and produced by Maurice and Marcia Ostroff from Henry Katzew’s original manuscript Edited by Joe Woolf Key to the Front Cover Top to bottom: • The famous Haganah immigrant ship S.S Exodus 1947, in which 4500 refugees were forcibly returned to Hamburg in September 1947. (See foreword & Palestine Post article page 23) • Boris Senior in a Spitfire constructed from bits and pieces. • A group of Machalniks, in the Tank Corps. • A column of the 9th Palmach, Commando Battalion. Revised and reprinted November 2003 COPYRIGHT© All rights reserved No part of this document may be reproduced by any means whatsoever, except with the prior express written permission of the South African Zionist Federation. Correspondence should be addressed to: Telfed, 19/1 Schwartz Street, Ra’anana, 43212 Israel Telephone +972 9-7446110 Fax + 972 9-7446112 E-mail: [email protected] About this book “South Africa’s 800” is about Machal, the collective Hebrew acronym for volunteers from abroad and about individual volunteers, colloquially known as Machalniks. The book reveals details never previously documented and provides a valuable new perspective on Israel’s birth and struggle for survival. It includes eye witness reports by active participants in the events. While written mainly through South African eyes, the book also contains gripping anecdotes about volunteers from the USA, Britain and other countries. It throws new light on important events and personalities of the time. In his engaging eloquent style, Henry Katzew takes the reader on a fascinating expedition through recent historical events including: • Adventures of 8 young South Africans in their ill-fated attempt to bypass British restrictions on immigration to Palestine, by travelling overland from Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 DGRU Report
    SUBMISSION AND RESEARCH REPORT ON THE JUDICIAL RECORDS OF NOMINEES FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE HIGH COURT AND THE LAND CLAIMS COURT APRIL 2020 1 INDEX TO THE REPORT PAGE NUMBER Submission and Methodology 4 Research report COURT CANDIDATE Constitutional Court Justice Nambitha Dambuza - 11 Mayosi Advocate Alan Dodson SC 21 Judge Jody Kollapen 31 Judge Majeke Mabesele 41 Justice Rammaka Mathopo 49 Justice Mahube Molemela 58 Judge Dhaya Pillay 67 Judge Bashier Vally 77 Gauteng High Court (For secondment to the Land Mr Pume Canca 85 Claims Court) Judge Zeenat Carelse 92 Mr Thomas Ncube 97 KwaZulu-Natal High Court (For secondment to the Land Claims Court) Judge Cassim Sardiwalla 102 Mr Bruce Bedderson 109 Mr Poobalan Govindasamy 113 KwaZulu – Natal High Court Ms Sharon Marks 118 Ms Lokwalo Mogwera 123 Advocate Ian Topping SC 127 Judge Shane Kgoele 133 Mpumalanga High Court (Deputy Judge President) Judge Sheila Mphahlele 138 Advocate Hein Brauckmann 145 Mpumalanga High Court Mr Bruce Langa 151 2 Advocate Thandoluhle 154 Mankge Advocate Ntombizanele 159 Ndlokovane Mr Takalani Ratshibvumo 164 Advocate Henk Roelofse 170 Ms Lindiwe Vukeya 174 North West High Court Advocate Nic Laubscher 178 3 INTRODUCTION 1. The Democratic Governance and Rights Unit (“DGRU”) is an applied research unit based in the Department of Public Law at the University of Cape Town. DGRU’s vision is of a socially just Africa, where equality and constitutional democracy are upheld by progressive and accountable legal systems, enforced by independent and transformative judiciaries, anchored by a strong rule of law. The mission of the DGRU is to advance social justice and constitutional democracy in Africa by conducting applied and comparative research; supporting the development of an independent, accountable and progressive judiciary; promoting gender equality and diversity in the judiciary and in the legal profession; providing free access to law; and enabling scholarship, advocacy and online access to legal information.
    [Show full text]