Characterization of an adapted microbial population to the bioconversion of carbon monoxide into butanol using next-generation sequencing technology
Guillaume Bruant
Research officer, Bioengineering group Energy, Mining, Environment - National Research Council Canada
Pacific Rim Summit on Industrial Biotechnology and Bioenergy December 8 -11, 2013 Butanol from residue (dry): syngas route
biomass → gasification → syngas → catalysis → synfuels
(CO, H2, CO2, CH4) (alcohols…)
Biocatalysis vs Chemical catalysis
potential for higher product specificity
may be less problematic when impurities present
less energy intensive (low pressure and temperature)
Anaerobic undefined mixed culture vs bacterial pure culture
mesophilic anaerobic sludge treating agricultural wastes (Lassonde Inc, Rougemont, QC, Canada)
PRS 2013 - 2 Experimental design
CO Alcohols
Serum bottles incubated at Next Generation RDP Pyrosequencing mesophilic temperature Sequencing (NGS) pipeline 35°C for 2 months Ion PGMTM sequencer http://pyro.cme.msu.edu/ sequences filtered CO continuously supplied Monitoring of bacterial and to the gas phase archaeal populations RDP classifier atmosphere of 100% CO, http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ 1 atm 16S rRNA genes Ion 314TM chip classifier VFAs & alcohol production bootstrap confidence cutoff low level of butanol of 50 %
Samples taken after 1 and 2 months total genomic DNA extracted, purified, concentrated
PRS 2013 - 3 NGS: bacterial results
Bacterial population - Phylum level
100%
80% Other Chloroflexi 60% Synergistetes % of total Firmicutes sequences Proteobacteria 40% Bacteroidetes Spirochaetes 20% Actinobacteria unclassified Bacteria
0%
1 month 2 months Initial sludge
Other (<0.5%): TM7, Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast, Thermotogae, Chlorobi, Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Planctomycetes, OP11, Elusimicrobia, Thermodesulfobacteria, Lentisphaerae and SR1 Phylum of interest: Firmicutes (8.0% to 82.5%)
PRS 2013 - 4 NGS: bacterial results
Bacterial population - class level
100% Other Anaerolineae (Ch)
80% Synergistia (Sy) Negativicutes (F) Clostridia (F) 60% % of total Gammaproteobacteria (P) identified classes Alphaproteobacteria (P) 40% Betaproteobacteria (P) Deltaproteobacteria (P) 20% Epsilonproteobacteria (P) Flavobacteria (B) Sphingobacteria (B) 0% Bacteroidia (B) Spirochaetes (S)
1 month 2 months Actinobacteria (A) Initial sludge
Other (<0.5%): Bacteroidetes incertae sedis (B), Bacilli (C), Erysipelotrichia (C) and Dehalococcoidetes (Ch)
A: Actinobacteria, S: Spirochaetes, B: Bacteroidetes, P: Proteobacteria, F: Firmicutes, Sy: Synergistetes and Ch: Chloroflexi
Class of interest: Clostridia (6.5% to 82.4%)
PRS 2013 - 5 NGS: bacterial results
Bacterial population - order level Other Anaerolineales (Ch) Synergistales (Sy) 100% Selenomonadales (F) 90% Clostridiales (F) Methylococcales (P) 80% Rhodospirillales (P) 70% Caulobacterales (P) 60% Rhizobiales (P) % of total 50% Hydrogenophilales (P) identified orders Burkholderiales (P) 40% Desulfuromonadales (P) 30% Desulfovibrionales (P) 20% Syntrophobacterales (P) 10% Campylobacterales (P) 0% Flavobacteriales (B) Sphingobacteriales (B) Bacteroidales (B)
1 month 2 months Spirochaetales (S) Initial sludge Actinomycetales (A)
Other: 20 orders < 0.5%
A: Actinobacteria, S: Spirochaetes, B: Bacteroidetes, P: Proteobacteria, F: Firmicutes, Sy: Synergistetes and Ch: Chloroflexi
Order of interest: Clostridiales (6.4% to 82.3%)
PRS 2013 - 6 NGS: bacterial results
Order Clostridiales - family level
100% Gracilibacteraceae Peptostreptococcaceae 80% Eubacteriaceae Clostridiales Incertae Sedis III
60% Ruminococcaceae % of total Syntrophomonadaceae identified families Clostridiales Incertae Sedis XI 40% Lachnospiraceae Clostridiaceae 1 20% Peptococcaceae 2 Peptococcaceae 1 0% Clostridiales Incertae Sedis XIII Clostridiales Incertae Sedis XII unclassified Clostridiales 1 month 2 months Initial sludge
genera of interest: Clostridium (~0% to 9.0%), Oscillibacter (~0% to 9.9%), Acetobacterium (~0% to 49.8%)
PRS 2013 - 7 NGS: bacterial main results
Significant decrease of the 3 principal components of the initial bacterial population Bacteroidetes (30.3% to 4.3%) Actinobacteria (23.7% to 9.3%) Proteobacteria (20.9% to 1.4%)
Significant increase of the Firmicutes became ultra-dominant (82.5%) 1 class (Clostridia, 82.4%), 1 order (Clostridiales, 82.3%)
Emergence of 3 families Clostridiaceae (Clostridium, known solvent producers) Ruminococcaceae (Oscillibacter, valeric acid producer) Eubacteriaceae (Acetobacterium, known acetate producers)
PRS 2013 - 8 NGS: archaeal main results Limited impact of CO on archaeal population
Archaeal population - class level
100% 2 phyla 90% Euryarchaeota 80% (98.1% to 99.2%) 70% 60% Crenarchaeota % of total 50% Thermoprotei (C) identitfied classes No impact on 40% Methanomicrobia (E) Methanobacteria (E) 30% diversity 20% 2 phyla 10% 3 classes 0%
e th s g n th 5 orders d o n lu o s m l 1 m ia 2 it In
Methanobacteria increased (13.9% to 45.9%) specifically Methanobacterium (44.6%), hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanomicrobia decreased (82.8% to 52.7%) emergence of Methanosarcina, methanogen metabolically diverse and nonmethanogenically CO user
PRS 2013 - 9 Conclusions and perspectives
Ion Torrent Next Generation Sequencing platform powerful technique for microbial population monitoring
Impact of CO on microbial population insights on microbial species adapted to bioconversion of CO into butanol importance of Clostridiales (Clostridium and Oscillibacter)
Next: bio-augmentation strategies microorganisms identified through NGS optimize and stabilize the process (improve butanol production)
PRS 2013 - 10 Acknowledgments
Serge Guiot Marie-Josée Lévesque Alain Corriveau
Questions?
PRS 2013 - 11