DOCSLIB.ORG

A 2.1 - IWT Bottlenecks and Potentials in the BSR Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A 2.1 - IWT Bottlenecks and Potentials in the BSR Final Report A 2.1 - IWT Bottlenecks and Potentials in the BSR Final Report Activity: WP 2, Activity 1 Version: finalised Date: 22/02/2019 Marcus Engler ISL EMMA – Report This document represents the intermediate Report of the EMMA Activity 2.1. It describes a collection of bottlenecks, some ideas how to overcome and probable positive effects in the countries of participating organisations. A bottleneck is described as an existing permanent obstacle for inland navigation in the partner countries. Since the inputs towards this report are researched and elaborated by the EMMA partners, some readers might miss individual bottlenecks. However the project did not aim at covering the entirety of all possible bottlenecks, but at covering everything of relevance regarding projects requirements. The requirements for this activity are set to cover all parts of all countries except for Germany: Since a coverage of the project is the Baltic Sea Region (BSR), Germany is analysed by its north eastern part: From the River Weser via the river Elbe up to the river Oder at the German-Polish Border. The named rivers run more or less in a north/south direction, in order to cover the region, all waterways between the Weser and the Oder more or less connecting these fairways in an east/west direction, are part of the research. The research was done using a questionnaire in a table format was created, containing 28 data fields with open and multiple choice questions. This document covers the outcome of the questionnaire with accompanying information about the countries characteristics to set a context. Please find the complete questionnaire with hints but without answers in the annex of this document. A total of 39 bottlenecks were collected in the countries Finland, named parts of Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Sweden. The number per country is very different: The most information was collected in the parts of Germany – since Germany has already a well-developed IWT system with a long tradition and history. Second highest number of bottlenecks (eleven) were identified in Poland with a rather low use of IWT, Sweden reported four bottlenecks, Finland two and Lithuania one. These different amounts can be observed when reading through the individual country information: for Sweden, Finland and Lithuania each bottleneck is describes whereas for Poland and Germany a summary is given. The terms “Inland navigation” or “inland water transport” (IWT) is used throughout this document also with respect to lake sea navigation. The sequence of countries in this report is according to alphabetical order. Contrary to the description of EMMA Activity 2.1, costs regarding the overcome of bottlenecks are not included in this report. The research unveiled a range of cost from none to multi-million Euro investments for infrastructural enhancements. But these figures show just a part of the truth: anticipated costs would be given, but these figures might be completely different to real cost (e.g. cost initially expected and actual cost for the new airport in Berlin, BER) and furthermore, administration and lobby cost are not determinable. Since this project is also about such aspects, absolute or relative cost would distort the reality and might impeach credibility of this project. A 2.1 Page 1 / 29 Content A 2.1 Final Report .................................................................................................................................... 0 1 Finland .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Bottlenecks .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Assessment of effects on elimination of bottlenecks ............................................................... 6 1.3 Positive twist to regions from infrastructure investment in Saimaa Canal .............................. 7 2 Germany ........................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Bottlenecks .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Assessment of effects on elimination of bottlenecks ............................................................. 10 2.3 Positive twist to regions from infrastructure investment in Germany .................................... 12 3 Lithuania ......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Bottlenecks at the River Nemunas ........................................................................................ 13 3.2 Curonian lagoon and river Nemunas ..................................................................................... 14 4 Poland ............................................................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Bottlenecks ............................................................................................................................ 16 4.2 Assessment of effects on elimination of bottlenecks ............................................................. 17 4.3 Positive twist to regions from infrastructure investment in Poland ........................................ 19 5 Sweden .......................................................................................................................................... 21 5.1 Bottlenecks ............................................................................................................................ 21 5.2 Assessment of effects on elimination of bottlenecks ............................................................. 23 6 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 24 6.1 Vessel Classes ...................................................................................................................... 24 6.2 Border Rivers ......................................................................................................................... 24 6.3 Maintenance Works ............................................................................................................... 24 6.4 Infrastructure.......................................................................................................................... 24 6.5 Cost ....................................................................................................................................... 25 6.6 Elemination of Bottlenecks anmd positive Twists summary .................................................. 25 7 Annex A: the IWT Bottleneck Questionnaire .................................................................................. 26 7.1 Type of Bottleneck ................................................................................................................. 27 A 2.1 Page 2 / 29 7.2 Vessel Classification .............................................................................................................. 28 7.3 Status of bottleneck elimination ............................................................................................. 28 7.4 Expected Effect ..................................................................................................................... 29 A 2.1 Page 3 / 29 List of tables and figures Figure 1.1 Map of Finland 5 Figure 1.1 Map of Germany 10 List 3.1 German IWT potential 11 Figure 3.2 Map of German IWT potentials 11 Figure 4.1 Map of Lithuania 13 Figure 4.2 The mouth of the river Atmata - Klaipeda state seaport 14 Figure 4.3 The mouth of the river Atmata - Jurbarkas 15 Figure 4.4 Jurbarkas - Kaunas 15 Figure 5.1 Map of Poland 17 List 5.1 Polish IWT potential 18 Figure 5.2 Map of Polish IWT potentials 19 Figure 6.1 Map of Sweden 21 Figure 7.1 The Questionnaire used for EMMA Bottleneck Collection 26 A 2.1 Page 4 / 29 1 FINLAND Finland is a country with about 16,200 km coastal routes and inland waterways, of which about 4,000 km are used commercially. The most important fairway is the Lake Saimaa area with a length of about 772 km and 1,200 vessels calling per year. 1.1 Bottlenecks 1.1.1 The Saimaa Canal Both bottlenecks in Finland described below are connected with the Saimaa Canal. This canal was opened in 1856 and connects Lake Saimaa with the Gulf of Finland. It connects many lakes and was always of strong interest for the Finnish forest industry. The canal is located on Finnish and Russian territory. The dimensions of the Saimaa canal defines its own vessel sizes separate from the UN ECE Blue book, this type is called Saimax1. The canal currently contains eight locks. By enlarging all locks by 12 meters in length would benefit the traffic in Saimaa inland waterway by increasing the vessel fleet from approximately 30 to 90 and thus increased efficiency and reliability of this IWT. This is seen as cost at a medium range. Another political issue is the possibility to increase the water level in the Saimaa Canal by 10 cm. This measure together with a solution to stabilise the dams in the Canal is technically possible but requires a permission of The Water Court. These measures would enhance cost efficiency and reliability of this waterway at a relatively low cost. Figure 1.1 to the right shows a map2 of Finland with the approximate location
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Oder-Neisse Line As Poland's Western Border
    Piotr Eberhardt Piotr Eberhardt 2015 88 1 77 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/ GPol.0007 April 2014 September 2014 Geographia Polonica 2015, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp. 77-105 http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0007 INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES www.igipz.pan.pl www.geographiapolonica.pl THE ODER-NEISSE LINE AS POLAND’S WESTERN BORDER: AS POSTULATED AND MADE A REALITY Piotr Eberhardt Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw: Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article presents the historical and political conditioning leading to the establishment of the contemporary Polish-German border along the ‘Oder-Neisse Line’ (formed by the rivers known in Poland as the Odra and Nysa Łużycka). It is recalled how – at the moment a Polish state first came into being in the 10th century – its western border also followed a course more or less coinciding with these same two rivers. In subsequent cen- turies, the political limits of the Polish and German spheres of influence shifted markedly to the east. However, as a result of the drastic reverse suffered by Nazi Germany, the western border of Poland was re-set at the Oder-Neisse Line. Consideration is given to both the causes and consequences of this far-reaching geopolitical decision taken at the Potsdam Conference by the victorious Three Powers of the USSR, UK and USA. Key words Oder-Neisse Line • western border of Poland • Potsdam Conference • international boundaries Introduction districts – one for each successor – brought the loss, at first periodically and then irrevo- At the end of the 10th century, the Western cably, of the whole of Silesia and of Western border of Poland coincided approximately Pomerania.
    [Show full text]
  • Raport Z Wykonania Map Zagrożenia Powodziowego I Map Ryzyka
    Projekt: Informatyczny system osłony kraju przed nadzwyczajnymi zagrożeniami Nr Projektu: POIG.07.01.00–00–025/09 RAPORT Z WYKONANIA MAP ZAGROZ ENIA POWODZIOWEGO I MAP RYZYKA POWODZIOWEGO Projekt: Informatyczny system osłony kraju przed nadzwyczajnymi zagrożeniami Nr Projektu: POIG.07.01.00–00–025/09 SPIS TREŚCI: WYKAZ SKRÓTÓW STOSOWANYCH W DOKUMENCIE 4 DEFINICJE 5 I. WPROWADZENIE 7 II. PODSTAWA OPRACOWANIA MZP I MRP 9 III. ZAKRES OPRACOWANIA MZP I MRP 13 IV. DANE WYKORZYSTANE DO MZP I MRP 37 IV.1. NUMERYCZNY MODEL TERENU 41 IV.2. PRZEKROJE KORYTOWE RZEK 41 V. OPIS METODYKI OPRACOWANIA MZP 43 V.1. MODELOWANIE HYDRAULICZNE 43 V.2. SCENARIUSZE POWODZIOWE 70 V.3. WYZNACZANIE OBSZARÓW ZAGROŻENIA POWODZIOWEGO 73 VI. OPIS METODYKI OPRACOWANIA MRP 83 VI.1. NEGATYWNE KONSEKWENCJE DLA LUDNOŚCI 83 VI.2. RODZAJ DZIAŁALNOŚCI GOSPODARCZEJ 84 VI.3. OBIEKTY ZAGRAŻAJĄCE ŚRODOWISKU W PRZYPADKU WYSTĄPIENIA POWODZI 86 VI.4. OBSZARY CHRONIONE 87 VI.5. OBSZARY I OBIEKTY DZIEDZICTWA KULTUROWEGO 87 VI.6. OBLICZENIE WARTOŚCI POTENCJALNYCH STRAT POWODZIOWYCH 88 VII. FORMA SPORZĄDZENIA MZP i MRP 91 VII.1. BAZA DANYCH PRZESTRZENNYCH MZP I MRP 91 VII.2. WIZUALIZACJA KARTOGRAFICZNA MZP i MRP 92 VIII. PUBLIKACJA I PRZEKAZANIE ORGANOM ADMINISTRACJI MZP I MRP 101 VIII.1. PRZEKAZANIE MZP i MRP ORGANOM ADMINISTRACJI 101 VIII.2. PUBLIKACJA MZP i MRP 101 VIII.3. ZASADY UDOSTĘPNIANIA MZP i MRP 105 2 Projekt: Informatyczny system osłony kraju przed nadzwyczajnymi zagrożeniami Nr Projektu: POIG.07.01.00–00–025/09 IX. MZP i MRP W PLANOWANIU I ZAGOSPODAROWANIU PRZESTRZENNYM 107 X. PRZEGLĄD I AKTUALIZACJA MZP I MRP 114 XI.
    [Show full text]
  • 31. Änderung Des Flächennutzungsplans Samtgemeinde Bardowick
    Samtgemeinde Bardowick Landkreis Lüneburg 31. Änderung des Flächennutzungsplans Samtgemeinde Bardowick (Gemeinde Barum) Ausgearbeitet im Auftrag der Samtgemeinde Bardowick durch Planungsbüro Patt + Stöhr Bahnhofstraße 1 21337 Lüneburg Tel.: 0 41 31 - 89 18 02 - 0 Fax: 0 41 31 - 89 18 02 - 9 E-mail: [email protected] www.patt-stoehr.de Erläuterungsbericht 31. Änderung des Flächennutzungsplans (Gemeinde Barum) Samtgemeinde Bardowick Landkreis Lüneburg Übersichtsplan (M. 1 : 100.000) Hinweis Kennzeichnung am rechten Seitenrand der kursiv hervorgehobenen Textänderung auf Seite 15 gemäß der Auflage der Genehmigungsverfügung des Landkreis Lüneburg vom 06.07.2006, Az.: 60.71-612010-04/31. Planungsbüro Patt + Stöhr, Lüneburg 2 Erläuterungsbericht 31. Änderung des Flächennutzungsplans (Gemeinde Barum) Samtgemeinde Bardowick Landkreis Lüneburg Inhaltsverzeichnis: Vorbemerkung 5 1. Anlaß und Zielsetzung der Änderung 5 2. Rahmenbedingungen 6 2.1 Räumliche Lage / Infrastruktur 6 2.2 Übergeordnete Planungen 7 2.2.1 Landesraumordnungsprogramm (LROP) 7 2.2.2 Regionales Raumordnungsprogramm (RROP) 8 2.2.3 Landschaftsrahmenplan (LRP) 8 2.2.4 Landschaftsplan (LP) der Samtgemeinde Bardowick 9 2.2.5 Entwicklungskonzept 2006 der Samtgemeinde Bardowick 10 3. Planung 12 3.1 Ortsteil Barum 14 3.1.1 Änderungsfläche 1: Sondergebiet „Naherholung“ nördlich 14 am Barumer See 3.1.2 Änderungsfläche 2: Mischbaufläche und Grünfläche südlich 17 am Barumer See 3.1.3 Änderungsfläche 3: Grünfläche „Einmündungsbereich 19 Barumer Schöpfwerkskanal – Barumer See“ 3.1.4 Änderungsfläche
    [Show full text]
  • Mechtersen, 033555402023
    Gebäude und Wohnungen sowie Wohnverhältnisse der Haushalte Gemeinde Mechtersen am 9. Mai 2011 Ergebnisse des Zensus 2011 Zensus 9. Mai 2011 Mechtersen (Landkreis Lüneburg) Regionalschlüssel: 033555402023 Seite 2 von 32 Zensus 9. Mai 2011 Mechtersen (Landkreis Lüneburg) Regionalschlüssel: 033555402023 Inhaltsverzeichnis Einführung ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Rechtliche Grundlagen ............................................................................................................................. 4 Methode ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Systematik von Gebäuden und Wohnungen ............................................................................................. 5 Tabellen 1.1 Gebäude mit Wohnraum und Wohnungen in Gebäuden mit Wohnraum nach Baujahr, Gebäudetyp, Zahl der Wohnungen, Eigentumsform und Heizungsart .............. 6 1.2 Gebäude mit Wohnraum nach Baujahr und Gebäudeart, Gebäudetyp, Zahl der Wohnungen, Eigentumsform und Heizungsart ........................................................... 8 1.3.1 Gebäude mit Wohnraum nach regionaler Einheit und Baujahr, Gebäudeart, Gebäudetyp, Zahl der Wohnungen, Eigentumsform und Heizungsart ..................................... 10 1.3.2 Gebäude mit Wohnraum nach regionaler Einheit und Baujahr, Gebäudeart, Gebäudetyp, Zahl der Wohnungen, Eigentumsform
    [Show full text]
  • Mb60 Manzke.Pdf (6.564
    Article, Published Version Manzke, Diethardt Erd- und grundbauliche Beratung beim Bau des Elbeseitenkanals Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau Verfügbar unter/Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11970/102883 Vorgeschlagene Zitierweise/Suggested citation: Manzke, Diethardt (1987): Erd- und grundbauliche Beratung beim Bau des Elbeseitenkanals. In: Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau 60. Karlsruhe: Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau. S. 115-130. Standardnutzungsbedingungen/Terms of Use: Die Dokumente in HENRY stehen unter der Creative Commons Lizenz CC BY 4.0, sofern keine abweichenden Nutzungsbedingungen getroffen wurden. Damit ist sowohl die kommerzielle Nutzung als auch das Teilen, die Weiterbearbeitung und Speicherung erlaubt. Das Verwenden und das Bearbeiten stehen unter der Bedingung der Namensnennung. Im Einzelfall kann eine restriktivere Lizenz gelten; dann gelten abweichend von den obigen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Documents in HENRY are made available under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0, if no other license is applicable. Under CC BY 4.0 commercial use and sharing, remixing, transforming, and building upon the material of the work is permitted. In some cases a different, more restrictive license may apply; if applicable the terms of the restrictive license will be binding. Dipl.-Ing. Diethardt M a n z k e ERD- UND GRUNDBAULICHE BERATUNG BEIM BAU DES ELBESEITENKANALS Consultation on earthwork and foundation practice during the construction of the Elbe Lateral Canal Diethardt Manzke, Dipl.-Ing., Wissen­ schaftlicher Angestellter in der Bundes­ anstalt für Wasserbau (BAW). Geboren 1935. Studium des Bauingenieur­ wesens an der Technischen Hochschule Braunschweig von 1956 bis 1964. Seit 1966 in der Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau Außenstelle Küste und dort Sachbearbei-' ter im Referat Erd- ·und Grundbau.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Holocene Decline of Trapa Natans L. in Northern Poland in the Light of New Palaeobotanical and Geochemical Data
    Limnol. Rev. (2019) 19, 2: 77–91 DOI 10.2478/limre-2019-0007 The late Holocene decline of Trapa natans L. in Northern Poland in the light of new palaeobotanical and geochemical data Agnieszka Lewandowska1*, Przemysław Niedzielski2, Mariusz Gałka3 1Department of Biogeography and Palaeoecology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Krygowskiego 10, 61-680 Poznań, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] (* corresponding author) 2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Trapa natans (water chestnut) is an aquatic, thermophilic plant whose decline has been observed in many localities in central Europe during the last decades. In this paper, we present a description of two new T. natans subfossil sites located outside its present northern distribution in Poland. High-resolution analysis of plant macrofossils supported by geochemical analysis were undertaken to reconstruct the palaeoecological habitat and examine the cause of the late Holocene decline of T. natans that took place ca. 4000 calibrated years before AD 1950 (cal. yr BP) in a paleolake, presently the Bagno Kusowo bog. Its disappearance was a consequence of terrestrialisation and the development of peatland. In paleolake sediments covered by the peat layer in the Mechacz Wielki bog, T. natans macrofossils were found from before ca. 3300 cal. yr BP. The decline ofT. natans could have resulted from the changes and development of other plant communities where the dominant role was played by Stratiotes aloides and Nymphaea sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Elbe Estuary Publishing Authorities
    I Integrated M management plan P Elbe estuary Publishing authorities Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg Ministry of Urban Development and Environment http://www.hamburg.de/bsu The Federal State of Lower Saxony Lower Saxony Federal Institution for Water Management, Coasts and Conservation www.nlwkn.Niedersachsen.de The Federal State of Schleswig-Holstein Ministry of Agriculture, the Environment and Rural Areas http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/UmweltLandwirtschaft/DE/ UmweltLandwirtschaft_node.html Northern Directorate for Waterways and Shipping http://www.wsd-nord.wsv.de/ http://www.portal-tideelbe.de Hamburg Port Authority http://www.hamburg-port-authority.de/ http://www.tideelbe.de February 2012 Proposed quote Elbe estuary working group (2012): integrated management plan for the Elbe estuary http://www.natura2000-unterelbe.de/links-Gesamtplan.php Reference http://www.natura2000-unterelbe.de/links-Gesamtplan.php Reproduction is permitted provided the source is cited. Layout and graphics Kiel Institute for Landscape Ecology www.kifl.de Elbe water dropwort, Oenanthe conioides Integrated management plan Elbe estuary I M Elbe estuary P Brunsbüttel Glückstadt Cuxhaven Freiburg Introduction As a result of this international responsibility, the federal states worked together with the Federal Ad- The Elbe estuary – from Geeshacht, via Hamburg ministration for Waterways and Navigation and the to the mouth at the North Sea – is a lifeline for the Hamburg Port Authority to create a trans-state in- Hamburg metropolitan region, a flourishing cultural
    [Show full text]
  • „Kein Deich, Kein Land, Kein Leben“ Informationsblatt Des Artlenburger Deichverbandes
    „Kein Deich, kein Land, kein Leben“ Informationsblatt des Artlenburger Deichverbandes Ausgabe 01/Juli 2013 • Sonderausgabe zum Elbe-Hochwasser im Juni 2013 Ausgabe 01/Juli 2013 • Sonderausgabe zum Elbe-Hochwasser im Juni 2013 Ausgabe 01/Juli 2013 • Sonderausgabe zum Elbe-Hochwasser im Juni 2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis | Impressum Dramatische Tage | Vorwort „Nach den heftigen Niederschlägen und Allen Helferinnen und Helfern sagen wir dem Hochwasser an Aller, Leine und Oker in Süd-Niedersachsen Ende Mai waren wir froh, dass die Elbe davon nicht betrof- Danke schön für die großartige Unterstützung! fen war – doch dann kam alles anders.“ Deichhauptmann Hartmut Burmester Liebe Mitglieder des Artlenburger dies zum ersten Mal in der fast 125-jähri- Deichverbandes, gen Geschichte unseres ADV mit dieser Liebe Helferinnen und Helfer, Ihnen vorliegenden Sonderausgabe zur Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Elbe-Flut 2013 auf spezielle und persönli- che Weise tun. Auf 20 Seiten lassen wir die Zwei Wochen lang hat uns die Elbe mit vergangenen, teilweise dramatischen Tage ihrem extremen Hochwasser in Atem ge- nochmals Revue passieren. halten. Mittlerweile ist auch in unserem Uns ist es aber nicht nur wichtig, Ihnen Verbandsgebiet wieder relative Ruhe ein- zu danken, sondern auch, Sie mit vielen gekehrt, doch die Aufräumarbeiten laufen Hartmut Burmester nützlichen Informationen rund um unse- nach dem erneuten Jahrhunderthochwas- ren Verband, die Deiche, den Hochwas- ser weiter auf vollen Touren. Für unsere serschutz und die Elbe zu versorgen. Uns Deiche war das Hochwasser 2013 mit Re- haben viele Anfragen und Gespräche ge- kord-Wasserständen von 11,93 m am Pegel zeigt, dass der Bedarf an detaillierten und Bleckede, 9,59 m am Pegel Hohnstorf und vor allem verlässlichen Informationen stark 8,71 m am Pegel Artlenburg wieder eine vorhanden ist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Spatial Scale in Habitat Selection by European Beaver
    doi: 10.1111/ecog.03621 42 187–200 ECOGRAPHY Research The importance of spatial scale in habitat selection World in a human-dominated Ecology by European beaver Adrian Zwolicki, Rafał Pudełko, Katarzyna Moskal, Joanna Świderska, Szymon Saath and Agata Weydmann A. Zwolicki (http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-681X) ([email protected]), K. Moskal, J. Świderska and S. Saath, Univ. of Gdańsk, Dept of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoology, Gdańsk, Poland. – A. Weydmann, Univ. of Gdańsk, Inst. of Oceanography, Gdynia, Poland. AZ and AW also at: AZB analysis and software, Gdynia, Poland. – R. Pudełko, Inst. of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Inst., Dept of Bioeconomy and Systems Analysis, Puławy, Poland. Ecography We evaluated habitat selection by European beaver Castor fiber L. across a spatial gra- 42: 187–200, 2019 dient from local (within the family territory) to a broad, ecoregional scale. Based on doi: 10.1111/ecog.03621 aerial photography, we assessed the habitat composition of 150 beaver territories along the main water bodies of the Vistula River delta (northern Poland) and compared these Subject Editor: Douglas A. Kelt data with 183 randomly selected sites not occupied by the species. The beavers pre- Editor-in-Chief: ferred habitats with high availability of woody plants, including shrubs, and avoided Jens-Christian Svenning anthropogenically modified habitats, such as arable lands. Within a single family terri- Accepted 8 August 2018 tory, we observed decreasing woody plant cover with increasing distance from a colony centre, which suggests that beaver habitat preferences depend on the assessment of both the abundance and spatial distribution of preferred habitat elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Samtgemeinde Scharnebeck Der Samtgemeindeburgermeister
    SAMTGEMEINDE SCHARNEBECK DER SAMTGEMEINDEBURGERMEISTER Samtaemsinde Scharnebeck Postfach 1162 21377 Scharnebeck Mitgliedsgemeinden: Artlenburg, Brietlingen, Echem, Hittbergen, Hohnstorf, Ludersburg, Rullstorf, Scharnebeck An die Behorden und sons+igen Trager offen+licher Belange Fachbereich/Stabstelle: Fachbereich III - Bauen sowie Nachbargemeinden Aktenzeichen: -siehe Verteiler- Auskunft erteilt: Zimmer: Frau Beeken 2.03 E-Mail: [email protected] Marktplatz 1, 21379 Scharnebeck S (041 36)907-7311 a (0 41 36) 9 07-7391 Datum: 06.08.2020 42. Anderung des Fldchennutzungsplanes der Samtgemeinde Scharnebeck fur den Flecken Artlenburg, die Gemeinden Brietlingen, Echem, Hohnstorf, LOdersburg und Scharnebeck Benachrichtigung uber die offentliche Auslegung gemdB § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB Befeiligung der Behorden und sonstigen Trdger offentlicher Belange gemdB § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB Sehrgeehrte Damen und Herren, derSam+gemeindeausschuss derSam+gemeinde Scharnebeck hat in seinerSitzung am 29.07.2020 dem Entwurf der42. Anderung des Flachennu+zungsplanes derSam+gemeinde Scharnebeck betreffend den Flecken Artlenburg, die Gemeinden Brie+lingen, Echem, Hohnst- orf, LOdersburg und Scharnebeck sowie der Begrundung nebst Umweltbericht zuges+immt und die offentliche Auslegung gemaB § 3 Abs. 2 BauGB sowie die Be+eiligung der Behorden und sonsfigen Trager offen+licher Belange gemaB § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB beschlossen. Der En+wurf der Flachennutzungsplananderung mit der Begrundung nebst Umweltbericht, die umwel+bezogenen Informationen und die bereits vorliegenden umwel+bezogenen S+ellung- nahmen liegen vom 13.08.2020 bis zum 18.09.2020 offen+lich aus. Die Samtgemeinde Scharnebeck fuhrt nun das Verfahren der Be+eiligung der Behorden und sonstigen Trager offen+licher Belange gemaB § 4 Abs. 2 BauGB durch. Anliegend erhalten Sie eine digi+ale Ausfertigung des Entwurfs dero. g. Flachennu+zungsplananderung und der Be- grundung nebst Umwel+bericht mit der Bit+e, eine schriftliche Sfellungnahme bis zum 14.09.2020 abzugeben.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry in Poland with Special Attention to the Region of the Pomeranian Young Moraine
    AFSV Forstwirtschaft und Standortkartierung Waldoekologie online Heft 2 Seite 49 - 58 9 Fig., 2 Tab. Freising, Oktober 2005 Forestry in Poland with special attention to the region of the Pomeranian Young Moraine Marcin S z y d l a r s k i Abstract In the year 2004 the ASFV celebrated its 50th anniversary holding a conference in Sulęczyno, Kartuzy. This event offered the possibility to give an actual overview of forest resources and forest functions in Poland. The excursions of the meeting focused on the fascinating, diversified forest landscape formed by the Pomeranian phase of the Baltic glaciation. The Kartuzy Forest District is situated in the heart of the Kashubian Lakeland and the moraine hills. The landscape is not only characterized by the natural occurrence of Baltic beech forests but also by high diversity of soils and meso- and microclimatic de- viations providing habitats for rare plant species, including some plants typical of mountain regions. The tree species combination of the District is formed by pine, spruce, and beech. The oldest parts of the forests are legally protected as nature reserves. I. POLISH FOREST RESOURCES At the end of the 18th century the Polish forest area comprised about 40%, nowadays forests in Po- land cover approximately 8,942,000 hectares, which is 28.6% of an overall country area. According to international standards (FAO Forestry Department) and tests on economic forestry areas, the wooded area in Poland comprises more than 9,040,000 hectares, which is as many as 30% forest cover and is close to Central European average (www.fao.org/forestry/site/18308/en/pol).
    [Show full text]
  • 13. 4. 77 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 88/7
    13. 4. 77 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 88/7 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS (Publication of notices of public works contracts and licences in conformity with Council Directive 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 supplemented by Council Directive 72/277/EEC of 26 July 1972) MODEL NOTICES OF CONTRACTS A. Open procedures 1. Name and address of the authority awarding the contract (Article 16 (e)) (1): 2. The award procedure chosen (Article 16 (b)): 3. (a) The site (Article 16 (c)): (b) The nature and extent of the services to .be provided and the general nature of the work (Article 16 (c)): (c) If the contract is subdivided into several lots, the size of the different lots and the possibility of tendering for one, for several, or for all of the lots (Article 16 (c)): (d) Information relating to the purpose of the contract if the contract entails the drawing up of projects (Article 16 (c)): 4. Any time limit for the completion of the works (Article 16 (d)): 5. (a) Name and address of the service from which the contract documents and additional documents may be requested (Article 16 (f)): (b) The final date for making such request (Article 16 (f)): (c) Where applicable, the amount and terms of payment of any sum payable for such documents (Article 16 (f)): 6. (a) The final date for receipt of tenders (Article 16 (g)): (b) The address to which they must be sent (Article 16 (g)): (c) The language or languages in which they must be drawn up (Article 16 (g)): 7.
    [Show full text]