1 Laos’s Peripheral Centrality in Southeast Asia: Mobility, Labour and Regional Integration James Alan Brown School of Geography Queen Mary University of London
[email protected] 2 Laos´s Peripheral Centrality in Southeast Asia: Mobility, Labour and Regional Integration Abstract Laos´s position at the centre of the Southeast Asian mainland has entailed peripherality to regional loci of power. Its geography of peripheral centrality has however resulted in Laos becoming a realm of contestation between powerful neighbours. The analysis traces the construction of Laos within a regional space from pre-colonial times to contemporary special economic zones. Laos has been produced through mobility, foreign actors´ attempts to reorient space to their sphere of influence, and transnational class relations incorporating Lao workers and peasants, Lao elites and foreign powers. These elements manifest within current special economic zone projects. Key words: Laos, regional integration, mobility, labour, special economic zones. Introduction In the past two decades, the Lao government has emphasized turning Laos from a “land- locked” to a “land-linked” country. Laos is located at the centre of mainland Southeast Asia and has been historically isolated from maritime trade routes. The vision encapsulated by the “land- linked” phrase is thus of transforming Laos´s relative geographic isolation into a centre of connectivity for the region. Laos will act as the central integrative territory which brings together other countries in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), facilitating commerce between them.1 The “land-locked” part of the phrase implies tropes of “Laos as a forgotten, lost, half-formed and remote land”,2 one which has historically experienced “political, territorial and military stagnation”.3 The move to a “land-linked” country can therefore be read as signifying a desire to 1 Vatthana Pholsena and Ruth Banomyong, Laos From Buffer State to Crossroads (Chiang Mai: Mekong Press, 2006), 2-3.