AUM Historical Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AUM Historical Review AUM Historical Review AUM Historical Review # 1,Winter 2012 Editor Graydon Rust Associate Editors Allison Hamilton Tracy Wilson Graphic Designers Sam Blakely Melissa Holston (cover) Advisor Steven Gish Photographs Alabama Department of Archives and History Rob Atkins (Space Race, contents page) Frank Williams, Auburn University at Montgomery Joseph Postiglione / Birmingham Civil Rights Institute (Freedom Riders, contents page) Cameron Whitman (Brown v. Board, contents page) Printing Wells Printing, Montgomery, AL © 2012, AUM Historical Journal Published by the Chi Psi Chapter of the Phi Alpha Theta History Honor Society Auburn University at Montgomery, P.O. Box 244023, Montgomery, AL 36124-4023 The ideas expressed in these essays are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and contributors and do not necessarily represent the official statements, opinions, or policies of Auburn University at Montgomery or the Department of History at AUM. Neither Auburn University at Montgomery nor the Department of History at AUM accept any liability for the content of this journal. 1 2 AUM Historical Review Contents Introduction Graydon Rust 4 The Space Race Begins Allison Hamilton 5 Freedom Riders: Soldiers in a Non-Violent Army Space Race Tracy Wilson 17 A Pirate’s Life for Me: Craig T. Sheldon and Anti-Communism Landon Ledbetter 21 A Conversation with Dr. Wyatt Wells Jennifer Kellum 37 Freedom Riders Brown v. Board: Alabama’s Initial Reaction Elizabeth Elder 41 Contributors 52 Call for papers 52 Brown v. Board 3 Introduction In late January 2011, Dr. While we agreed that the criteria phy 2 students in the Department Steven Gish proposed his idea for should be open to allow for works of Fine Arts for the numerous the creation of a student-edited from all areas, I suppose it is only designs that they produced and to history journal and immediately natural for the best works to come Sam Blakely and Melissa Holston the suggestion garnered tremen- from the matter most familiar and for contributing the chosen designs dous support. Since then, time readily accessible for research. and the hours that they put in to has zoomed by and I cannot This year’s award-winning papers implement them. I am obliged to believe that we are now beginning include Allison Hamilton’s “The the staff at the Alabama Depart- another calendar year. With that Space Race Begins” and Landon ment of Archives and History for said, I am thrilled to introduce Ledbetter’s “A Pirate’s Life for their encouragement, for providing to you the inaugural issue of the Me: Craig T. Sheldon and Anti- us with the photographs included AUM Historical Review. Each Communism,” winning the Dodd throughout the Review, and for al- year, the History Department and Morse prizes respectively. In lowing us to distribute copies at the recognizes quality student scholar- addition to these, this issue also Archives itself. Specifically, I would ship with the presentation of two includes an essay titled “Brown v. like to thank Dr. Norwood Kerr for awards—the Dodd and Morse pa- Board—Alabama’s Initial Reac- answering the numerous editing per prizes—to the authors of that tion” by Elizabeth Elder, a review questions that I came across and year’s preeminent essays, and the of the 2011 PBS documentary for handling all the duties of my Review serves to further that ac- Freedom Riders and an interview job on the many occasions that I knowledgment. With the creation with AUM’s own Dr. Wyatt Wells, was preoccupied with the journal, of this journal, we hope to provide conducted by Jennifer Kellum. and also Steve Murray for the a forum of appreciation for not There are a number of advice and opportunities he pro- only the top two papers of the individuals whom I would like to vided. I am also grateful to Dr. Lee year, but to all exemplary histori- thank for their support and efforts Farrow for assisting in the develop- cal work produced by students at in producing the AUM Historical ment of a number of our papers as Auburn University at Montgom- Review. Without them, none of the authors progressed through her ery. Furthermore, we hope that we this would have been possible. I Historical Methods course. Most can instill both a sense of camara- would first like to express gratitude importantly of all, I would like to derie among history majors and a to the Associate Editors, Tracy thank all of the individuals who greater interest in history through- Wilson and Allison Hamilton, contributed pieces to the Review out the entire AUM community for their constant hard work and for the research, writing, and revi- while also providing students with dedication, and to Dr. Gish for not sions that they put forth, as well as experience in all aspects of the only providing us with this oppor- for the patience that they displayed editing world. tunity but also for his continuous as I bombarded them with an In our first issue, we have guidance and energy throughout incessant chain of emails. unintentionally acquired a theme the process. Thanks also go to centered on Alabama history. Breuna Baine and her Typogra- Graydon Rust, Editor 4 Introduction AUM Historical Review The Cold War was put men and satellites in space, Allison Hamilton much more than a series the two nations constantly of battles for psychological pushed one another forward, gains; it expanded beyond the and eventually past what reaches of the atmosphere humans once thought possible. and penetrated the great On October 4, 1957, unknown—outer space. the Soviet Union successfully When the United States and launched Sputnik, the world’s the Soviet Union first began first satellite. It shook the scrambling to stake their claim free world as it flashed across on the experienced German the night sky—its mystery scientists and wonder beautiful, yet who terrifying. Much of the world developed marveled in disbelief. The the V-2 French exclaimed, “We had rockets, its expected the Americans to aims were do it; it was the Russians who weapons, succeeded.”1 The United States not space understood the implications exploration. of such an immense scientific However, gain and over the next few after months it scrambled to put countless its own satellite into orbit. experiments The journey was long and, at and tests times, embarrassing. Officials using these in Washington failed to missiles it make crucial decisions. Early was clear that attempts crashed and burned there was greater potential on the launch pad. At times for them outside of mass it seemed that the U.S. would destruction. Through fierce never reach outer space—that competition the arms race is, until the government shifted evolved into a space race its eyes to the Redstone Arsenal between the Soviet Union and research facility in Huntsville, the U.S that spanned from Alabama. Within only a few The Space Race Begins 1945 to 1969. In competing to short months, the scientists 5 there were able to assemble and only nuclear weapons, but As Staver sought to successfully fire a rocket which the advancement of modern persuade the Germans, would eventually carry the U.S. technology as a whole. The Washington was striving into space. As the Jupiter C stage was set and the space to determine whether the rocket soared into the air it took race, not to mention the Cold German scientists would the morale of the American War, had begun. even be welcome in the U.S. people with it. Not only did it On May 27, 1945, Major Debates raged in the “War, secure jobs for the people of Robert Staver of the U.S. Justice, Commerce, and State Huntsville, Alabama, it showed Army received an order from Departments.” The officials the nation that the space race Colonel Holger Toftoy to sweep were not only fearful of was far from over. into the region of Thuringia, possibly disgracing American After World War II the some 4,540 square miles of scientists who had been alliance of convenience German territory soon to be working on missile projects of between the United States and under Soviet control, and their own, but also a potential the Soviet Union had fallen “evacuate all German missile Nazi uprising on American apart. The nations were on technicians and their families… soil. Howard P. Robertson of opposite ends of the modern and take them to the American the Field Information Agency, political spectrum—one the zone.”3 With only twenty- Technical, claimed, “In beacon for capitalism and one days until the Soviets allowing the Peenemunde boys free trade, the other the father would occupy the region, to continue their developments, of communism. When Nazi Staver began his scramble to we are perpetuating the Germany was defeated in convince some 500 men to activities of a group which, 1945, the two nations raced join the side of the United if ever allowed to return to to attain any resources that States. In the first few days of Germany or to communicate could help them promote their the mission it seemed that all with Germany, can in fact own agendas on the world was hopeless. With no promise contribute to Germany’s stage. Perhaps the most vital of permanent employment ability to make war.” However, resources lay in the minds of or security for their families, advisors in closer connection the hundreds of scientists who many of the scientists and with President Truman had catapulted Germany ahead technicians turned the convinced him that, in light of of the international scientific Americans down. It was not a more powerful Soviet Union, community with their work until Wernher von Braun, the refusing the scientists would on the V-2 rocket—a weapon leading missile expert in the be a foolish and maybe even that had been successfully fired world, flew to Nordhausen to fatal decision.
Recommended publications
  • U-M·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road
    Castro's Cuba and Stroessner's Paraguay: A comparison of the totalitarian/authoritarian taxonomy. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Sondrol, Paul Charles. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 11:08:31 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185284 INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photogr2,pb and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted.. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this -reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is inciuded in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Security and Freedom-That Is Today’S Great Challenge
    SECURITYand FREEDOM the GREAT CHALLENGE Thirtieth Annual Report of the American Civil Liberties Union Dedicated to ROGER N. BALDWIN Esecntive Director 1920-1910 JOHN HAYNES HOLMES Chairman of the Board of Directors 1940- 19 T 0 EDWARD A. ROSS Chairman of the National Committee 1940-1950 with Respect, Gratitude and Affection TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION--“A FREE NATION OF FREE PEOPLE” 5 SECURITY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES .,.. 10 A. GENERAL ANTI-SEDITION LBGISLAI‘IVE EFFORTS 10 1. The McCarran Act ,. .,, 10 2. “Little McCarran” Acts 3. The Smith Act .,. ,.,..... ,.. :i 4. House Un-American Activities Committee ,........ .,............ 5. House Lobbying Committee ::, 6. State Investigations 17 B. SKIJRITY AND LOYAL’IY AMONG EMPLOYEES 17 1. Federal Program 2. The McCarthy Charges ::, 3. State and Local Programs; 4. Private Programs’ 22 C. OTHER THREATS TO FREEDOM OF OPINION 25 1. General Free Speech .,,....,,..,.... 2. Radio and Movies ., :: 3. Magazines and Books ..,. .._........... 29 4. Schools and Colleges .._.......... 5. Labor Unions .._...... 6. Aliens .._ .,..... .,.. .._ 7. Conscientious Objection __....,.._.........._.,..,,.......,,........................... D. OTHER THREATS TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW 1. Wiretapping ..,,...., .,..... 2. Bail Cases 3. Picketing of Courts 4. Grand Juries 38 THE FIRST FREEDOM .._............... 39 A. GENERAL FREE EXPRESSION .._.............................. B. LABOR ,,., . .. .. .. .. .. :; C. CENSORSHIP .,,,,.. ,.,... 40 D. RELIGION .,.. 44 DUE PROCESS OF LAW ,. 46 A. WIRETAPPING ,, ., .,,.... ..,...,_ .,, .,... .., .,.. 46 B. FAIR TRIAL .., 48 C. PUNISHMENT ,,... ,, 49 EQUALITY 49 A. MINORITIES ..~... 50 B. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES .._......... .._...... 53 1. Employment and Education .._ 2. Housing and Public Accommodations :; 3. Voting and Fair Trial .,.... ,... 55 C. PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS 56 1. Social 56 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Dream of Flight Biographical Essays in Honor of the Centennial of Flight, 1903–2003 Realizing the Dream of Flight Edited by VIRGINIA P
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20050229888 2019-08-29T21:04:34+00:00Z Biographical Essays in Honor oi F the Centennial of Flight, 1903-2003 /. Realizing the Dream of Flight Biographical Essays in Honor of the Centennial of Flight, 1903–2003 Realizing the Dream of Flight Edited by VIRGINIA P. DAWSON and MARK D. BOWLES National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division Office of External Relations Washington, DC NASA SP-2005-4112 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Realizing the dream of flight : biographical essays in honor of the centennial of flight, 1903-2003 / Virginia P. Dawson and Mark D. Bowles, editors. p. cm.—(The NASA history series) “NASA SP-2005-4112.” 1. Aeronautics—Biography. 2. Aeronautics—History. I. Dawson, Virginia P. (Virginia Parker) II. Bowles, Mark D. III. Series. TL539.R43 2005 629.13'092'273—dc22 2005018938 Tableof Contents INTRODUCTION . .vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . .xv Bessie Coleman: Race and Gender Realities Behind Aviation Dreams 1AMY SUE BIX . .1 She Flew for Women: Amelia Earhart, Gender, and American Aviation 2SUSAN WARE . .29 Sharing a Vision: Juan Trippe, Charles Lindbergh, and the Development 3of International Air Transport WILLIAM M. LEARY . .47 The Autogiro Flies the Mail! Eddie Rickenbacker, Johnny Miller, 4Eastern Airlines, and Experimental Airmail Service with Rotorcraft, 1939–1940 W. DAVID LEWIS . .69 Donald Douglas: From Aeronautics to Aerospace 5ROGER BILSTEIN . .87 Benjamin O. Davis, Jr., American Hero 6ALAN L. GROPMAN . .109 Curtis E. LeMay and the Ascent of American Strategic Airpower 7TAMI BIDDLE . .127 Willy Ley: Chronicler of the Early Space Age 8TOM D. CROUCH . .155 Who Was Hugh Dryden and Why Should We Care? 9MICHAEL GORN .
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Schriever and Early US Military Spaceflight Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Institute of Political and International Studies
    Bernard Schriever and Early US Military Spaceflight Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Institute of Political and International Studies Wing Commander Gerry Doyle RAF October 2016 i DISCLAIMER Research for this thesis was conducted under the auspices of a Royal Air Force Chief of Air Staff’s ‘Portal’ Fellowship while the author was a serving Royal Air Force officer. The view expressed within are, however, the author’s own, and should not be taken as representing the opinion or position of the Royal Air Force, the UK Ministry of Defence or HM Government. DECLARATION I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. 24 October 2016 G DOYLE © Gerry Doyle, 2016. ii CONTENTS Title Page………………………………………………………………………... i Disclaimer and Declaration…….……………………………………………… ii Contents…………………………………………………................................. iii Abstract………………………………………………………………………….. iv Bibliographic Notes…………………………………………………………….. v Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………….. vii List of Figures and Tables.…………………………………………………….. ix Chapter 1 – Technically Advanced Systems..………………………………. 1 Chapter 2 – Bernard Adolf Schriever …………………............................... 19 Chapter 3 – Literature, Sources and their Provenance............................... 47 Chapter 4 – The Virtuous Path: ICBMs and Reconnaissance Satellites…. 86 Chapter 5 – Manned Spaceflight: a Pet Project…………………………….. 120 Chapter 6 – Daydreaming: the USAF and Space Weaponization………… 151 Chapter 7 – Conclusions……………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Hands Across History
    Hands Across History A joint newsletter for the White Sands Historical Foundation and the White Sands Pioneer Group. Volume XIV, Letter I February 2018 The Artist Who Painted Huge Mural In Bldg. 1504 Returns By Jim Eckles ing to produce a large mural. Glaisek already had In late 1956 a young, New York City artist experience working with oil paint and murals so he named Robert Glaisek was drafted into the Army. jumped on the proposal. He was sent to basic training at Fort Knox, KY Hamill’s organization, which was in charge where he was tagged for the Armor Branch. How- of Army missile testing at White Sands, had just ever, a different fate awaited Glaisek when he was moved into a new building. He envisioned a trib- reclassified as an illustrator and shipped to White ute to his old boss Holger Toftoy who was then the Sands Proving Ground in January 1957. There he general in charge of Army missile development at was to create a mural that is truly a work of art Redstone Arsenal in Alabama. amongst the frugal practicality that marks typical Hamill and Toftoy had an association dat- military office space. ing back to World War II when Toftoy was put in Glaisek returned to White Sands, just before charge of retrieving as much advanced German Thanksgiving 2017, to see the painting he made 60 years ago after being invited by the missile range’s See Colonel Hamill’s Tribute, page 4 Cultural Resources staff to discuss re- pair of water dam- age from years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex-Communist Witnesses
    Michigan Law Review Volume 61 Issue 1 1962 Packer: Ex-Communist Witnesses Malcolm Sharp University of Chicago Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Evidence Commons, and the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Malcolm Sharp, Packer: Ex-Communist Witnesses, 61 MICH. L. REV. 209 (1962). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol61/iss1/12 This Book Reviews is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1962] REcENT BooKs 209 Ex-COMMUNIST WITNESSES. By Herbert L. Packer. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1962. Pp. xii, 279. $4.95. The four witnesses considered in this book-Chambers, Miss Bentley, Budenz and Lautner-all experienced misery and tension. Chambers se­ cured the indictment and conviction of Alger Hiss for perjury in denying charges of minor espionage committed while Hiss was an outstanding young New Deal lawyer in the '30's. Professor Packer agrees with me, if I under­ stand him, that Hiss has built a "very cogent case . against Chambers' veracity." (p. 42; and see pp. 22, 41) He considers that Hiss and his lawyers in their final efforts for a new trial raised substantial doubts, at least, about the typewriter evidence which was the most effective corroboration of Cham­ bers' story. (pp. 82-41} On the other hand he thinks that what seems to me the rather inconclusive testimony of Hedda Massing at the second trial and, more particularly, Nathaniel Weyl later, "tends to support the conclusion that Hiss was involved to some extent in Communist activities." (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 44 | Issue 1 Article 8 1953 Book Reviews Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Book Reviews, 44 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 83 (1953-1954) This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. BOOK REVIEWS NEW HORIZONS IN CRIMINOLOGY. By Harry Elmer Barnes and Nealey K. Teeters. Second Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, 1951. Pp. xvi - 887. $5.75. In this second edition of a widely read and used book the authors have succeeded in retaining many of the desirable features of the 1944 edition while adding more recent materials that bring the discussion of many topics up to date. The new edition actually contains 182 fewer pages than the 1944 book. The reduction in size has been accomplished by the elimination from the text of many quotations and by the condensation of materials. Despite this the book remains encyclopedic in character. No other single book exists which covers more aspects of criminology and penology. The book opens with three chapters (Part I) designed to set the stage for the reader by indicating the nature of modern crime, the presentation of facts pertaining to crime and criminals and by discussing the problems posed by various types of crimes and criminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastland Collection File Series 4: Legislative Files Subseries 11: Internal Security Subcommittee Library
    JAMES O. EASTLAND COLLECTION FILE SERIES 4: LEGISLATIVE FILES SUBSERIES 11: INTERNAL SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE LIBRARY The U.S. Senate eliminated the Internal Security Subcommittee in 1977. In 1977-78, Senator James O. Eastland began transferring his congressional papers to the University of Mississippi. Among the items shipped were publications from the subcommittee’s library. Due to storage space concerns and the wide availability of many titles, the volumes were not preserved in toto. However, this subseries provides a complete bibliographic listing of the publications received as well as descriptions of stamps, inscriptions, or enclosures. The archives did retain documents enclosed within the Internal Security Subcommittee’s library volumes and these appear in Box 1 of this subseries. The bibliographic citation that follows will indicate the appropriate folder number. Call numbers and links to catalog records are provided when copies of the books are in the stacks of the J.D. Williams Library or Special Collections. Researchers should note that these are not necessarily the same copies that were in the Internal Security Subcommittee library or even the same editions. If the publications were previously held by the Internal Security Subcommittee, the library catalog record will note James O. Eastland’s name in the collector field. 24th Congress of the CPSU Information Bulletin 7-8, 1971. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Peace and Socialism Publishers, [1971]. Enclosed: two advertisements from bookseller Progress Books. Enclosed items retained in Folder 1-1. Mildred Adams, ed. Latin America: Evolution or Explosion? New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1963. Stamped: “Received/Jun 3 1963/Int. Sec. S-Comm.” Call Number: F1414 C774 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • I. F. Stone Encounters with Soviet Intelligence
    HoI. F.ll Stone:and Encounters with Soviet Intelligence I. F.Stone Encounters with Soviet Intelligence ✣ Max Holland Of all the disclosures contained in the notebooks of Alexander Vassiliev, few are likely to be more contentious than those involving the jour- nalist I. F. Stone. From April 1936 until at least the fall of 1938, according to the note- books, Stone acted as a “talent spotter,” helping to identify or recruit other Americans who might be receptive to assisting Soviet intelligence.1 Under the assigned codename of “Blin,” Stone also acted as a courier, conveying mes- sages between a Soviet intelligence ofªcer and his American agent. These were intelligence functions, having nothing to do with being an editorial writer for the New York Post, Stone’s main occupation at the time. Vassiliev’s notes also reveal that Stone passed along privileged information that might be deemed useful for intelligence purposes. Altogether, these activities either contravene or, as this essay will argue, greatly complicate widely held views about Stone and his status as an icon of journalism. When Stone died in June 1989 at the age of 81, all three major television networks announced his death on their news shows as if he were a household name rather than a print journalist whose work had appeared primarily in elite publications normally associated with the country’s intelligentsia. Stone was hailed as the living embodiment of the ªrst amendment, a ªercely inde- pendent journalist opposed to the “Washington Insiderism” that often blights reporting from the nation’s capital.2 Both The Washington Post, Stone’s local paper, and The New York Times ran full obituaries, editorials of praise, and ap- preciations in several op-ed pieces.
    [Show full text]
  • Elizabeth Churchill Brown Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3k4002v7 No online items Register of the Elizabeth Churchill Brown papers Finding aid prepared by Rebecca Mead Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 1999 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Elizabeth 84010 1 Churchill Brown papers Title: Elizabeth Churchill Brown papers Date (inclusive): 1943-1984 Collection Number: 84010 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 41 manuscript boxes, 2 envelopes, 1 oversize folder(17.0 Linear Feet) Abstract: Memoirs, other writings, correspondence, and printed matter relating to American politics, especially during the 1950s; Senator Joseph McCarthy; and American communism. Includes some papers, including memoirs, of Constantine Brown, journalist and husband of E. C. Brown. Also includes some letters and writings of Earl Browder. Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Elizabeth Churchill Brown papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Biographical Note Elizabeth Brown and her husband, Constantine Brown, were active journalists in Washington, D.C. and abroad for many years. As a result, they established contacts with key political and diplomatic figures both nationally and internationally. After obtaining a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Berlin (c. 1912), Constantine Brown was in Cambridge, England doing post-graduate work when World War I began.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Popular Geopolitics of Cold War Rocketry
    This article was downloaded by: [University Of Melbourne] On: 7 December 2008 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 773216551] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Geopolitics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713635150 Space and the Atom: On the Popular Geopolitics of Cold War Rocketry Fraser Macdonald a a Geography Programme, Melbourne School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Online Publication Date: 01 October 2008 To cite this Article Macdonald, Fraser(2008)'Space and the Atom: On the Popular Geopolitics of Cold War Rocketry',Geopolitics,13:4,611 — 634 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/14650040802275479 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650040802275479 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Geography of Intellect by Nathaniel Weyl, Stefan Possony
    616 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 31:612 yesterday. It is because constitutional law is a process rather than a static set of rules that a commentary can no longer encompass it. This appears to have driven Professor Schwartz to describing to the best of his ability that which is, or was, at the moment of writing, and then to amend history to demonstrate that this was always so. Thus, he may well be right in suggesting that the federalism that once called for division of sovereign power between nation and states (and the people, if you will) has disappeared. It is different, however, to say that it disappeared and to say that it never existed. Having said all that, I would say one thing more. The book is not without merit. Most of its propositions of law are accurate. A student cramming for a typical state bar examination would probably find in here all he possibly need know of the subject. He will not have an accurate picture of how the current rules developed or what the process is that is likely to transmute them into something different in the future. But bar examiners are not interested in those things. Neither, I suspect, are most students, most lawyers, most professors. For these, and for the political science market to which I already alluded, the volumes will fill a longfelt need. Professor Schwartz may prefer the solace of royalties to the fulsome praise of critics. I expect that there will be much more of the former than the latter.
    [Show full text]