Strategy and Sequence in the Secession of the American South A
Strategy and Sequence in the Secession of the American South Hudson Meadwell and Lawrence M. Anderson A shorter version of this paper is forthcoming in Theory and Society 1 Sequence and Strategy in the Secession of the American South Hudson Meadwell and Lawrence M. Anderson Introduction The American Civil War remains one of the most studied moments in American political development. From a comparative perspective, the Civil War can be regarded from multiple points of view: as a case of secession (eg. Anderson, 2004; Meadwell, 1999), as a war (eg. Stedman, 1994), as a decisive episode in the international abolition of slavery (eg. Drescher, 1999, Blackburn, 1988), or as a phase in a process of democratic transition and consolidation (eg. Moore, 1966). Each of these perspectives situates the Civil War in a larger class of phenomena. These classes are independent. Not all wars are secessions; not all seceding societies are slaveholding; not all slaveholding societies abolish slavery via secession or war; not all democratic transitions involve war or secession. Yet the American Civil War was in some ways all of these. In this paper, we recognize the idiosyncratic combination of qualities of this case without, however, implying any commitment to a strong thesis of American exceptionalism (Wood, 1998; Gläser and Wellenreuther, 2002; Katznelson and Shefter, 2002; Lipset, 1995). The purpose is to develop an analysis that focuses on general patterns of political mobilization and political process, whether the subject is secession, war, slaveholding societies, revolutions or rebellions. The focus of this paper is radical political mobilization in the antebellum South.
[Show full text]