DOCSLIB.ORG

Left's Hollow Victory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JANUARY 2021 THE LEFT’S HOLLOW VICTORYPage 13 STRIKE STRIKE STRIKE STRIKE ONE! TWO! THREE! FOUR! SPLIT SENATE BALLOT MEASURES HOUSE LOSSES STATE LEGISLATURES ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: The Billionaire Political and Policy- The Niskanen Shelby Steele and Eli Steele Dragging Hollywood Oriented Giving After Center Discuss What Killed 5 (Even Further) Left 21 Citizens United 25 33 Michael Brown? www.CapitalResearch.org WE’VE REACHED OVER 1 MILLION USERS AND 2 MILLION PAGEVIEWS IN 2020 ALONE. We’re already competitive with our left-wing competitor’s websites that have been up for 20 years. InfluenceWatch profiles often appear as Featured Snippets like this: Check out these select profiles added since the last issue: Trump Accountability Project National Bail Fund Network BlackOUT Collective Choose Democracy Trafalgar Group InfluenceWatch Outperforms on Google From January through September 2020, InfluenceWatch profiles appeared nearly 40 million times when people searched Google; nearly 14 million of those results were on the first page. Search terms included “act blue charities,” “black lives matter tax status,” 5,852,449 “tom steyer controversy,” “antifa website,” and others. 5,423,545 5,327,305 4,674,422 5,077,992 3,685,186 3,588,515 3,366,423 3,351,484 3,770,290 3,843,916 3,607,739 2,777,538 2,557,036 3,140,647 2,045,420 2,198,877 1,837,672 2,025,799 1,915,465 DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP ‘18 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 Total Impressions WE’VE REACHED OVER 1 MILLION JANUARY 2021 USERS AND 2 MILLION PAGEVIEWS Volume 6, Issue 1 IN 2020 ALONE. CONTENTS We’re already competitive with our left-wing competitor’s websites that have been up for 20 years. ORGANIZATION TRENDS InfluenceWatch profiles often appear as 3 Featured Snippets like this: 5 The Billionaire Dragging Hollywood Check out these select profiles COMMENTARY (Even Further) Left added since the last issue: What Is Mark Zuckerberg’s By Ken Braun Election Money Doing in Trump Accountability Project Georgia? National Bail Fund Network By Scott Walter BlackOUT Collective SPECIAL REPORT Choose Democracy Capital Research is a monthly publication of the Capital Research Center (CRC), a The Left’s Hollow Victory Trafalgar Group nonpartisan education and research orga- 13 nization, classified by the IRS as a 501(c)(3) By Michael Watson public charity. CRC is an independent, tax-exempt insti- InfluenceWatch Outperforms on Google tution governed by an independent board of trustees. We rely on private financial support from the general public—individu- From January through September 2020, InfluenceWatch profiles appeared nearly 40 million times als, foundations, and corporations—for our ORGANIZATION TRENDS income. We accept no government funds and when people searched Google; nearly 14 million of those results were on the first page. Political and Policy-Oriented perform no contract work. 21 Giving After Citizens United: CRC was established in 1984 to promote Search terms included “act blue charities,” “black lives matter tax status,” 5,852,449 a better understanding of charity and An Update to CRC’s 2017 Analysis “tom steyer controversy,” “antifa website,” and others. philanthropy. We support the principles of 5,423,545 individual liberty, a free market economy, By Shane Devine and Michael Watson and limited constitutional government— the cornerstones of American society, 5,327,305 which make possible wise and generous 4,674,422 5,077,992 philanthropic giving. Capital Research (ISSN pending), is published monthly except April, June, GREEN WATCH 3,685,186 3,588,515 August, and December by Capital Research The Niskanen Center 3,366,423 Center, 1513 16th Street SW, Washington, DC 25 3,770,290 3,351,484 20036. Application to Mail at Periodicals By Hayden Ludwig 3,843,916 3,607,739 Prices is Pending at Washington, DC and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: 2,777,538 Send address changes to: Capital Research, 2,557,036 3,140,647 2,045,420 1513 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. 2,198,877 CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER 1513 16th Street NW SPECIAL REPORT Washington, DC 20036 1,837,672 2,025,799 1,915,465 Shelby Steele and Eli Steele Discuss 202.483.6900 33 What Killed Michael Brown? CapitalResearch.org DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP By Joseph (Jake) Klein ‘18 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘19 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 ‘20 [email protected] Internship inquiries are welcome. Total Impressions Publisher, Scott Walter Editor-in-Chief, Kristen Eastlick Editor, Jon Rodeback Photo Editor, Gayle Yiotis Cover design: Lori Schulman COMING IN 2021! COMMENTARY WHAT IS MARK ZUCKERBERG’S ELECTION MONEY DOING IN GEORGIA? By Scott Walter The biggest question the Georgia legislature should ask is whether a California billionaire should be allowed to waltz into the Peach State and finance aspects of their elections. Imagine if a billionaire of conservative or libertarian lean- ings—Charles Koch, say—had given $350 million to a nonprofit run by Republican operatives who previously worked at a “dark money” outfit tied to Karl Rove where they trained digital activists and campaign workers. Then imagine this nonprofit group re-granted the millions of dollars to local election officials to “help” them carry out the 2020 election—buying drop boxes for ballots, hiring https://bit.ly/3shkRkO. License: Quintano. Anthony Credit: temporary staff, conducting “voter education,” and the like. Finally, imagine that in 2020, a state that usually voted for the other party in presidential elections narrowly flipped to the donor’s preferred party, and counties receiving “help” In November, Capital Research Center documented a scheme were disproportionately ones that helped the Republican by left-leaning out-of-state donors Mark Zuckerberg and win the state, with many counties shifting dramatically from wife Priscilla Chan to give $350 million to an allegedly their historical patterns in a red-ward direction. “nonpartisan” nonprofit, the Center for Tech and Civic Life Even supposing there were perfectly ethical and legal reasons (CTCL), which in turn re-granted the funds to thousands of for all this, because of the appearance of election influ- governmental election officials around the country. ence from private parties with deep pockets, it would be front-page news. The New York Times would be outraged a nonprofit gave the appearance of acting in a partisan basis in an electoral process. Elected officials in the disfavored party state studies of how these funds were used, beginning with would be loudly objecting, threatening lawsuits, demand- Georgia (Pennsylvania is next). As I testified Friday to the ing investigations of the election officials who accepted the Georgia state Senate, the Georgia data are startling. funds, and insisting election laws be changed to prevent any We can’t specify all funding CTCL gave to Georgia counties, such effort in the future. because the Center isn’t disclosing that information to the As head of Capital Research Center, a watchdog on the use Associated Press or anyone else, even though they’re required and abuse of nonprofits, I would sympathize with the angry to reveal it in their next IRS filing (which conveniently won’t politicians and happily critique the scheme publicly. But I appear until a year from now). But using local government know of no such effort by right-leaning donors or nonprofits. records and news accounts, we’ve uncovered many of the largest grants, mostly given to the largest urban areas, and I do know, however, of a scheme by left-leaning out-of- CTCL has disclosed which counties received grants, though state donors Mark Zuckerberg and wife Priscilla Chan to not the amounts. Notably, CTCL funded less than one-third give $350 million to an allegedly “nonpartisan” nonprofit, of all counties. the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which in turn re-granted the funds to thousands of governmental election officials around the country. CRC has begun state-by- Scott Walter is president of Capital Research Center. CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER 3 We’ve correlated the grants with the official vote totals for the counties involved. Here are some notable discoveries The New York Times would be outraged we’ve found: if a conservative nonprofit gave the • Nine out of ten of CTCL’s largest known grants went to counties Joe Biden won. appearance of acting in a partisan basis • Of the ten counties with the greatest shifts to the in an electoral process. Democratic presidential candidate (comparing 2016 to 2020 votes), nine received CTCL grants. Do these numbers sound nonpartisan? If not, shouldn’t the • These nine grantees averaged a 13.7 percent shift authorities in Georgia and other battleground states, and toward the Democrat. Two, Cobb and Gwinnett, authorities in Washington, start investigating what hap- were among the four counties that delivered Biden pened, and whether CTCL, which is legally forbidden to act the most votes. as a partisan in elections, overstepped the law? There may • Although CTCL funded more counties won by be perfectly ethical explanations for all this that involve zero Donald Trump than by Biden in raw numbers, it electoral influence by outside parties, but public trust in only funded 21 percent of all Trump counties versus elections requires avoiding even the appearance of conflicts 55 percent of Biden counties. So a Biden county of interest. was more than two-and-a-half times more likely to receive funding.
Recommended publications
  • THE UNIVERSITY of TORONTO: GLOBAL LEADERSHIP and IMPACT the University of Toronto Is One of the World’S Leading Institutions of Higher Learning

    THE UNIVERSITY of TORONTO: GLOBAL LEADERSHIP and IMPACT the University of Toronto Is One of the World’S Leading Institutions of Higher Learning

    Winter 2021 ∙ utoronto.ca THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO: GLOBAL LEADERSHIP AND IMPACT The University of Toronto is one of the world’s leading institutions of higher learning. Our tri-campus system is renowned internationally for groundbreaking research and innovative teaching that provides students with a comprehensive global education. We drive economic growth and promote social well-being around the globe. Published January 2021. All data is University of Toronto generated, unless otherwise noted. A Worldwide Network of Excellence 2 Areas of Research Excellence 15 A constellation of alumni, students and researchers ensures From AI to regenerative medicine to urban studies, U of T plays a crucial role in our world. U of T leads the way. A Global City 4 A Comprehensive Global Education 19 Toronto is a dynamic global city—a vibrant and diverse hub U of T prepares all its students for a rapidly changing world of business, culture and innovation. and is set apart by its excellence, diversity and accessibility. A Global University 6 Outstanding Alumni 21 U of T is consistently ranked among the best universities Trail-blazing graduates apply their U of T education worldwide and is a global leader in transforming innovative to inspire students and shine on the world stage. ideas into products, services, companies and jobs. A Life-Saving Discovery is Born 8 Alumni Impact 25 U of T’s extensive alumni network is a significant driver 2021 marks the 100 year anniversary of insulin—one of the of economic growth and societal well-being. most significant advances in medical history. Incredible Breakthroughs 10 Looking to the Future 27 U of T researchers have made an astounding number of U of T is uniquely positioned to contribute to the world.
  • Senator Reports November 2020 ** for Specific Questions, Please Contact the Elected Representative Via Email**

    Senator Reports November 2020 ** for Specific Questions, Please Contact the Elected Representative Via Email**

    Senator Reports November 2020 ** For specific questions, please contact the Elected Representative via email** Hello Highlanders: Below you will find the information pertaining to the works of the various Senators within ASUCR for the month of November 2020. ​ This report was finalized on Monday, November 30th 2020 @ 5:00 PM. All Senators were contacted to submit their reports with adequate time. Any report column that states “Failed to Report” means that the Senator failed to report by the appropriate deadline or ​ ​ did not submit a report. If you have any questions, please contact [email protected]. ​ ​ Best Regards, Sean Nguyen (He/Him) ​ ‘20-’21 Personnel Director Office of the Personnel | Associated Students - ASUCR College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS) Name Report Orlando Cabalo ❖ Basic Needs President Pro Tempore ➢ Helped coordinate a meeting with student-parents and ASUCR [email protected] President Luis Huerta, to discuss how ASUCR can support student-parents financially. ■ I was in attendance of said meeting (Nov 12th, 2020) ➢ We all came to the conclusion that the “Student Relief” line item ($40k) under the ASUCR President budget may be used or the ASUCR Contingency (~$35k) fund may be used to support student-parents. ➢ Suggested we make an ASUCR ad-hoc committee to discuss how much money should be allocated to student-parents and how to best distribute it. ■ **Relief will be given out in the form of grocery gift cards, gas cards, transportation credits etc. ➢ Many kinks to be worked out, but we are aiming to start the relief program Winter Quarter. ➢ Compiled a list of grants, gift card discounts, & donation programs ​ that local grocery stores offer.
  • Four Days in July That Rocked Indiana Pence’S Pursuit of Veep Nod, Holcomb’S Win at GOP Central Committee Were Bold Moves Toward November History by BRIAN A

    Four Days in July That Rocked Indiana Pence’S Pursuit of Veep Nod, Holcomb’S Win at GOP Central Committee Were Bold Moves Toward November History by BRIAN A

    V22, N15 Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016 Four days in July that rocked Indiana Pence’s pursuit of veep nod, Holcomb’s win at GOP Central Committee were bold moves toward November history By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – When filing back through time to make sense of the Gov. Mike Pence and Lt. Gov. Eric Holcomb sensational Nov. 8 election that catapulted celebrate their Election Day victories that Gov. Mike Pence were forged by four momentus days in into global power July, including Trump’s visit to Indianapolis and capped Eric and Westfield. Holcomb’s unprec- edented rise in Indi- Republican presidential ticket with ana, it comes down Donald Trump. Except it was not fait to four days in July accompli. That wouldn’t happen until when the historic Friday, July 15. and fateful dramas unfolded. And on Monday July 25, after 22 Indiana Republi- On July 14, we witnessed cable breaking news can Central Committee members migrated back to Indiana reports of Gov. and Mrs. Pence disembarking on a charter from the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, the flight from Indianapolis to Teterboro, N.J., in what most thought was an obvious sign he was about to join the Continued on page 3 2016 winners and losers By MARK SOUDER FORT WAYNE – Every election results in individual and categorical winners and losers that impact the longer- term future of politics. Here are a few of my selections. Indiana winner: The Pence/Coats establishment. “The very worst choice you can It directed the quasi-slating of the victorious state ticket: Todd make is to opt out as a citizen, to Young for Senate, in part by give in to the cynicsm, the moving Eric Holcomb out and into position to become gover- despair and the anger.
  • Digital Financial Inclusion and the Mobile Money “Social” Enterprise

    Digital Financial Inclusion and the Mobile Money “Social” Enterprise

    DIGITAL FINANCIAL INCLUSION AND THE MOBILE MONEY “SOCIAL” ENTERPRISE: A SOCIO-LEGAL CRITIQUE OF M-PESA IN KENYA Serena Natile1 Abstract Financial technology or fintech initiatives are gaining increasing global attention as instruments for financial inclusion and economic and social development. Among such initiatives, mobile- phone-enabled money transfer systems, or “mobile money”, have been particularly acclaimed for facilitating access to financial services and creating opportunities for the so-called “unbanked poor”. One of the first and most-discussed mobile money projects to date is M-Pesa in Kenya, a digital payment system which is now used by over 70 per cent of the Kenyan population across a variety of sectors including finance, commerce, education, health, and social welfare. M-Pesa is premised on a narrative of social entrepreneurship and has increasingly embraced the idea of philanthrocapitalism, promoting the idea that digital financial inclusion can simultaneously address social problems and produce profit. This paper brings together socio-legal enquiry and international political economy analysis to illustrate the institutional arrangements underpinning the development of the M-Pesa and examine some of the projects built on its infrastructure. It argues that social entrepreneurship promotes a logic of opportunity rather than a politics of redistribution, favouring mobile money providers and the institutions involved in the mobile money social business over improving the lives of the intended beneficiaries, namely the unbanked poor. Keywords: fintech; mobile money; philanthrocapitalism; development; socio-legal studies 1 Serena Natile, Lecturer in Socio-Legal Studies, Brunel Law School, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom. 1 1. Introduction In March 2007 Kenya launched one of the first and so far most acclaimed mobile-phone- enabled money transfer systems, M-Pesa (from M for mobile, and pesa, the Swahili word for money).
  • Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy

    Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy

    0/-*/&4637&: *ODPMMBCPSBUJPOXJUI6OHMVFJU XFIBWFTFUVQBTVSWFZ POMZUFORVFTUJPOT UP MFBSONPSFBCPVUIPXPQFOBDDFTTFCPPLTBSFEJTDPWFSFEBOEVTFE 8FSFBMMZWBMVFZPVSQBSUJDJQBUJPOQMFBTFUBLFQBSU $-*$,)&3& "OFMFDUSPOJDWFSTJPOPGUIJTCPPLJTGSFFMZBWBJMBCMF UIBOLTUP UIFTVQQPSUPGMJCSBSJFTXPSLJOHXJUI,OPXMFEHF6OMBUDIFE ,6JTBDPMMBCPSBUJWFJOJUJBUJWFEFTJHOFEUPNBLFIJHIRVBMJUZ CPPLT0QFO"DDFTTGPSUIFQVCMJDHPPE Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy In Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy, Erik J. Engstrom offers an important, historically grounded perspective on the stakes of congressional redistricting by evaluating the impact of gerrymandering on elections and on party control of the U.S. national government from 1789 through the reapportionment revolution of the 1960s. In this era before the courts supervised redistricting, state parties enjoyed wide discretion with regard to the timing and structure of their districting choices. Although Congress occasionally added language to federal- apportionment acts requiring equally populous districts, there is little evidence this legislation was enforced. Essentially, states could redistrict largely whenever and however they wanted, and so, not surpris- ingly, political considerations dominated the process. Engstrom employs the abundant cross- sectional and temporal varia- tion in redistricting plans and their electoral results from all the states— throughout U.S. history— in order to investigate the causes and con- sequences of partisan redistricting. His analysis
  • The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network

    The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network

    PLATFORMS AND OUTSIDERS IN PARTY NETWORKS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DIGITAL POLITICAL ADVERTISING NETWORK Bridget Barrett A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at the Hussman School of Journalism and Media. Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: Daniel Kreiss Adam Saffer Adam Sheingate © 2020 Bridget Barrett ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Bridget Barrett: Platforms and Outsiders in Party Networks: The Evolution of the Digital Political Advertising Network (Under the direction of Daniel Kreiss) Scholars seldom examine the companies that campaigns hire to run digital advertising. This thesis presents the first network analysis of relationships between federal political committees (n = 2,077) and the companies they hired for electoral digital political advertising services (n = 1,034) across 13 years (2003–2016) and three election cycles (2008, 2012, and 2016). The network expanded from 333 nodes in 2008 to 2,202 nodes in 2016. In 2012 and 2016, Facebook and Google had the highest normalized betweenness centrality (.34 and .27 in 2012 and .55 and .24 in 2016 respectively). Given their positions in the network, Facebook and Google should be considered consequential members of party networks. Of advertising agencies hired in the 2016 electoral cycle, 23% had no declared political specialization and were hired disproportionately by non-incumbents. The thesis argues their motivations may not be as well-aligned with party goals as those of established political professionals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................... V POLITICAL CONSULTING AND PARTY NETWORKS ...............................................................................
  • UK General Election 2017

    UK General Election 2017

    UK General Election 2017 Highly uncertain outcome due to realignment of electorate post financial crisis Turnout will be key Increased risk of Disorderly Brexit whatever the outcome Risks for your portfolio: 1. Disorderly Brexit risk to increase GBP implied volatility, particularly vs EUR 2. Complicates timing of first BOE rate hike 3. Stagflation risk premium for Gilts and UK small cap equity markets The UK 2017 General Election was supposed to be the most predictable of recent political events. The past two years have sprung global surprises such as the election of candidates who have never held political office (France, the US), or where polls were significantly poor predictors of the outcome (UK GE 2015, Brexit referendum). This election was a sure thing: the Conservative Party would dominate the UK come June 9th. Former Business Secretary Vince Cable was not the only one to talk in panicked tones of a “One Party State”1 in the aftermath of Theresa May’s surprise call for an election. Now, with a week to go until polling day, that could not be further from the truth. The campaign began with a commanding lead… The Conservative Party held a dominating lead in all opinion polls conducted since the start of the year2. On the day that Theresa May made her unexpected announcement to call the election, the Conservatives were polling a vote share almost double that of Labour. The size of the Conservative lead came as no surprise. The Labour Party have been tearing themselves apart over what they actually stood for ever since the worse-than-expected performance of Ed Miliband in the 2015 General Election.
  • Starting Over: the Center-Right After Trump a Niskanen Center Conference on December 11, 2018

    Starting Over: the Center-Right After Trump a Niskanen Center Conference on December 11, 2018

    1 Starting Over: The Center-Right After Trump A Niskanen Center Conference on December 11, 2018 PANEL 3: POLITICAL PROSPECTS FOR A NEW CENTER-RIGHT Moderator: Geoff Kabaservice Panelists: Whit Ayres, Juleanna Glover, Mike Murphy Geoff Kabaservice: As some of you know, I was in Germany over the weekend, trying to do what I could to help plan this conference remotely. I couldn’t even begin to tell you what time my body thinks it is right now. Every time I go to Germany, it seems that I pick up a new word that has some relevance to my life or what’s about to follow. Last time I was there, I learned the term kummerspeck, which is literally “bacon grief.” It’s the food you eat and the weight you put on in the wake of some traumatic event, like a disappointing romantic episode. This time the term I learned was suppenkoma — “soup coma” — which is the stuporous state you find yourself falling into when you are at the first session after lunch of a conference. But fortunately we have the perfect antidote here to the soup coma, which is three of the best Republican political consultants, operatives, gurus that there are anywhere on the face of the Earth. Juleanna Glover: But I don’t consider myself a Republican anymore. [laughter] Geoff Kabaservice: Former, present, and possibly future Republican gurus, then. So this is Juleanna Glover to my left, Whit Ayres to my right, and Mike Murphy on the far right. Okay, so the subject of this panel is “Political Prospects for a New Center-Right.” This is where we descend from the somewhat empyrean realms of theory and philosophy into the more practical, Lenin-like question: What is to be done? Geoff Kabaservice: Those of us on the center-right have not had a pleasant time of it for the last several years — decades, perhaps.
  • State Law Limitations on the Use of Initiatives and Referenda in Connection with Zoning Amendments

    State Law Limitations on the Use of Initiatives and Referenda in Connection with Zoning Amendments

    Penn State Dickinson Law Dickinson Law IDEAS Faculty Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1978 State Law Limitations on the Use of Initiatives and Referenda in Connection with Zoning Amendments Peter G. Glenn [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/fac-works Recommended Citation Peter G. Glenn, State Law Limitations on the Use of Initiatives and Referenda in Connection with Zoning Amendments, 51 S. Cal. L. Rev. 265 (1978). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Dickinson Law IDEAS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of Dickinson Law IDEAS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATE LAW LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF INITIATIVES AND REFERENDA IN CONNECTION WITH ZONING AMENDMENTS PETER G. GLENN* Public willingness to regulate land uses often exceeds public confidence in local governments as agencies for such regulation.1 Local politicians have * Associate Professor of Law, University of North Carolina School of Law. Support for the preparation of this Article was provided by the North Carolina Law Center and by the excellent research assistance of Ms. M. Elizabeth Anania, member of the University of North Carolina School of Law class of 1977, and Mr. David Leech, member of the University of North Carolina School of Law class of 1978. 1. For an interesting discussion of public attitudes toward land development, see THE USE OF LAND 33-73 (W. Reilly ed. 1973). This discussion describes a "new mood" of skepticism about the benefits of unrestrained growth.
  • BOLD NEW WORLD the NEW PHILANTHROPY and ITS IMPERATIVES Part 2: the Evolution of Philanthropy and Impact Investing

    BOLD NEW WORLD the NEW PHILANTHROPY and ITS IMPERATIVES Part 2: the Evolution of Philanthropy and Impact Investing

    BOLD NEW WORLD THE NEW PHILANTHROPY AND ITS IMPERATIVES Part 2: The Evolution of Philanthropy and Impact Investing J.M.F. KEENEY, Social Sector and Innovation Commentator Founding Editor, FAST THINKING Magazine © Copyright 2013 John M.F. Keeney & Waldron 2 BOLD NEW WORLD: THE NEW PHILANTHROPY AND ITS IMPERATIVES CONTENTS PART 2: THE EVOLUTION OF PHILANTHROPY AND IMPACT INVESTING...............4 THE IDEAL PERSON: IN HISTORY..........................................................................4 DARKNESS AND RE-BIRTH..................................................................................5 MODERN BOOMS............................................................................................6 IN SEARCH OF A DEFINITION..............................................................................7 THE NEW PHILANTHROPY DEFINITION LIST............................................................7 MEASUREMENT: CAN WE REALLY DO WITHOUT IT?...................................................8 THREE CHALLENGES POSED BY LEAP OF REASON....................................................10 IMPACT INVESTORS: PIONEERS OF CHANGE...........................................................11 A SMALL BUT REVOLUTIONARY QUESTION............................................................13 ARABELLA: Creativity 2 + x $ = (S) Impact.........................................................14 E INNOVATION................................................................................................16 IN SEARCH OF A USABLE DEFINITION FOR THE SOCIAL
  • The Prize for Peace

    The Prize for Peace

    THE NCRP QUARTERLY / WINTER 2005 IN THIS EDITION The Prize for 1 Peace OPINION 2 Pragmatic Politics PERSPECTIVE 4 Economic Democracy in Peril The Gutting of the Community Reinvestment Act Photo Credit: Green Belt Movement and Its Effects on Rural America The Prize for Peace The Nobel committee places a stamp of approval on PERSPECTIVE 7 Nonprofits the environmental social justice movement, but how does Mobilize this group stay alive before and after the accolades? against CFC’s Terror List By Omolara Fatiregun and Mira Gupta Check Requirements The Nobel Committee’s Year of Firsts In October 2004, the first Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to an African 501(c)(4) 9 woman, Dr. Wangari Maathai, for her efforts in advancing a green movement. Organizations Maximizing Maathai’s Green Belt Movement (GBM), a nongovernmental organization in Nonprofit Voices Kenya, was founded in the early 1970s to raise environmental awareness and and Mobilizing promote self and community empowerment within the country. the Public Nobel committee members have expressed hope that their decision will raise awareness about the relationship between securing living environments and When it 11 keeping the peace. Natural resources are at the root of many bloody conflicts Comes to Generosity, in Africa, and nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs, are essential to the Lists are cause of social justice on the continent, often “The Prize for Peace” continued on page 13. Deceiving Prof. Wangari Maathai and Prof. Vertestine Mbaya, founding Board Member of the Green Belt Movement celebrate the Nobel Peace Prize OPINION Pragmatic Politics By Rick Cohen might reattach Responsive Philanthropy the discrimina- The quarterly journal of the tory faith-based National Committee for Nonprofits were alert and active on the days language that he Responsive Philanthropy leading up to the national elections.
  • Introduction. Sensible Politics: the Visual Culture of Nongovernmental

    Introduction. Sensible Politics: the Visual Culture of Nongovernmental

    Introduction Meg McLagan and Yates McKee Politics revolves around what can be seen, felt, sensed. Political acts are encoded in medial forms—feet marching on a street, punch holes on a card, images on a television newscast, tweets about events unfolding in real time—by which the political becomes manifest in the world. These forms have force, shaping people as subjects and constituting the contours of what is perceptible, sensible, legible. In doing so, they define the terms of political possibility and create terrain for politi- cal acts. Following Jacques Rancière, we are interested in how various orderings of social relations become “sensible” as viable sites of contestation by nongovern- mental activists. Pursuing this line of questioning requires two interconnected lev- els of analysis. First, it requires close attention to the formal, aesthetic, rhetorical, and affective dimensions of the images, performances, and artifacts that make up what George Marcus has called “the activist imaginary.” 1 Second, it requires an examination of the processual aspect of this imaginary, which is to say, the whole network of financial, institutional, discursive, and technological infrastructures and practices involved in the production, circulation, and reception of the visual- cultural materials with which this volume concerns itself. By bringing these realms together into one complex we examine the political fields constituted by images, the practices of circulation that propel them, and the platforms on which they are made manifest. The conjunction of visual culture and nongovernmental politics in this volume’s subtitle could be presumed to refer to two distinct realms: the representational world of visual culture that somehow encodes and represents the political, on one side, and the domain of the political, on the other.